dcfef27 cli: Reject arguments to -getinfo (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Currently it's possible to accidentally type e.g.
bitcoin-cli -getinfo getbalance
and get an answer which can be confusing; the trailing arguments are just ignored.
To avoid this, throw an error if the user provides arguments to
`-getinfo`.
Tree-SHA512: 3603e8fa852b884d1dd3b7462db40b092fe8b3390fd4384b4ee330315d797aff711e9f62990012fd4b5a55c8678734ba8497a5488a09ee6b65cf8a99017d6eb4
5e69a43 Add test for bitcoin-cli -getinfo (John Newbery)
3826253 rpc: Handle `getinfo` locally in bitcoin-cli w/ `-getinfo` (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Since @laanwj doesn't want to maintain these changes anymore, I will.
This PR is a revival of #8843. I have addressed @jnewbery's comments.
Regarding atomicity, I don't think that is a concern here. This is explicitly a new API and those who use it will know that this is different and that it is not atomic.
Tree-SHA512: 9664ed13a5557bda8c43f34d6527669a641f260b7830e592409b28c845258fc7e0fdd85dd42bfa88c103fea3ecdfede5f81e3d91870e2accba81c6d6de6b21ff
3918d93f3 [tests] fixups from set_test_params() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
#11121 had a silent merge conflict in `bitcoin_cli.py`. This fixes it.
Also fixes a comment in `example_test.py`
Tree-SHA512: f22a645c51c9aeda005526338ad6f2ee07f2bab172847fc54f51fecf1c79e778970be61e5e637d4e0aba3a02e5aba0737b0b57f1bc11a514a1acd94c221b54d6
c6ec4358a [tests] Add bitcoin_cli.py test script (John Newbery)
b23549f6e [tests] add TestNodeCLI class for calling bitcoin-cli for a node (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We don't test bitcoin-cli at all. That means that we can miss inconsistencies between the bitcoin-cli client and the RPC interface, such as #10698 and #10747. It also means that the various bitcoin-cli options and features are untested and regressions could be silently introduced.
Let's fix that.
This PR adds bitcoin-cli testing in the python functional test_framework:
1. Add a bitcoin_cli.py test script that tests bitcoin-cli. At the moment it only tests that the result of `getinfo` is the same if you run it as an RPC or through bitcoin-cli, but can easily be extended to test additional bitcoin-cli features
**EDIT: `--usecli` option is moved to a separate PR. This PR now only covers the bitcoin_cli.py test.**
2. ~Add a `--usecli` option to the test framework. This changes the test to use bitcoin-cli for all RPC calls instead of using direct HTTP requests. This is somewhat experimental. It works for most tests, but there are some cases where it can't work transparently because:~
- ~the testcase is asserting on a specific error code, and bitcoin-cli returns a different error code from the direct RPC~
- ~we're sending a very large RPC request (eg `submitblock`) and it can't be serialized into a shell bitcoin-cli call.~
~I think that even though `--usecli` doesn't work on all tests, it's still a useful experimental feature. Future potential enhancements:~
- ~enhance the framework to automatically skip tests that are known to fail with bitcoin-cli if the `--usecli` option is used.~
- ~run a subset of tests in Travis with `-usecli`~
This builds on and requires the `TestNode` PR #10711 . As an aside, this is a good demonstration of how tidy it is to add additional features/interfaces now that test node logic/state is encapsulated in a TestNode class.
Addresses #10791
Tree-SHA512: a1e6be12e8e007f6f67b3d3bbcd142d835787300831eb38e6027a1ad25ca9d79c4bc99a41b19e31ee95205cba1b3b2d21a688b5909316aad70bfc2b4eb6d8a52
