fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Needs to be done because no one has removed the years yet
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa0074e2d82928016a43ca408717154a1c70a4db
Tree-SHA512: 210e92acd7d400b556cf8259c3ec9967797420cfd19f0c2a4fa54cb2b3d32ad9ae27e771269201e7d554c0f4cd73a8b1c1a42c9f65d8685ca4d52e5134b071a3
dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 refactor: test: use _ variable for unused loop counters (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This tiny PR substitutes Python loops in the form of `for x in range(N): ...` by `for _ in range(N): ...` where applicable. The idea is indicating to the reader that a block (or statement, in list comprehensions) is just repeated N times, and that the loop counter is not used in the body, hence using the throwaway variable. This is already done quite often in the current tests (see e.g. `$ git grep "for _ in range("`). Another alternative would be using `itertools.repeat` (according to Python core developer Raymond Hettinger it's [even faster](https://twitter.com/raymondh/status/1144527183341375488)), but that doesn't seem to be widespread in use and I'm not sure about a readability increase.
The only drawback I see is that whenever one wants to debug loop iterations, one would need to introduce a loop variable again. Reviewing this is basically a no-brainer, since tests would fail immediately if a a substitution has taken place on a loop where the variable is used.
Instances to replace were found by `$ git grep "for.*in range("` and manually checked.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64
instagibbs:
manual inspection ACK dac7a111bd
practicalswift:
ACK dac7a111bdd3b0233d94cf68dae7a8bfc6ac9c64 -- the updated code is easier to reason about since the throwaway nature of a variable is expressed explicitly (using the Pythonic `_` idiom) instead of implicitly. Explicit is better than implicit was we all know by now :)
Tree-SHA512: 5f43ded9ce14e5e00b3876ec445b90acda1842f813149ae7bafa93f3ac3d510bb778e2c701187fd2c73585e6b87797bb2d2987139bd1a9ba7d58775a59392406
590bda79e876d9b959083105b8c7c41dd87706eb scripted-diff: Remove setup_clean_chain if default is not changed (Fabian Jahr)
98892f39e3d079c73bff7f2a5d5420fa95270497 doc: Improve setup_clean_chain documentation (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The first commit improves documentation on setup_clean_chain which is misunderstood quite frequently. Most importantly it fixes the TestShell docs which are simply incorrect.
The second commit removes the instances of `setup_clean_clain` in functional tests where it is not changing the default.
This used to be part of #19168 which also sought to rename`setup_clean_chain`.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 590bda79e876d9b959083105b8c7c41dd87706eb
Tree-SHA512: a7881186e65d31160b8f84107fb185973b37c6e50f190a85c6e2906a13a7472bb4efa9440bd37fe0a9ac5cd2d1e8559870a7e4380632d9a249eca8980b945f3e
0d101a340c44841cbbc5982d55354b1787bc39e2 test: Add test for maxtxfee option (MarcoFalke)
177550101b600ccb32886695326eb72cd9752c8b wallet: Remove unreachable code in CreateTransaction (MarcoFalke)
5c1b9714cb0a13be28324f91f4ec9ca66a1de8c7 wallet: Fix -maxtxfee check by moving it to CWallet::CreateTransaction (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Follow up to #16257, this PR makes `bumpfee` aware of `-maxtxfee`.
It also prevents dangling locked unspents when calling `fundrawtransaction` - because the previous check was after `LockCoin`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 0d101a340c44841cbbc5982d55354b1787bc39e2, only change is small test fixup
Tree-SHA512: 3464b24ae7cd4e72ed41438c6661828ba1304af020f05da62720b23668ae734e16cf47c6d97e150cc84ef631ee099b16fc786c858f3d089905845437338fd512
