10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d [test] remove confusing p2p property (gzhao408)
549d30faf04612d9589c81edf9770c99e3221885 scripted-diff: replace p2p with p2ps[0] in p2p_invalid_tx (gzhao408)
7a0de46aeafb351cffa3410e1aae9809fd4698ad [doc] sample code for test framework p2p objects (gzhao408)
784f757994c1306bb6584b14c0c78617d6248432 [refactor] clarify tests by referencing p2p objects directly (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
The `TestNode` has a `p2p` property which is an alias for `p2ps[0]`.
I think this should be removed because it can be confusing and misleading (to both the test writer and reviewer), especially if a TestNode has multiple p2ps connected (which is the case for many tests).
Another example is when a test has multiple subtests that connect 1 p2p and use the `p2p` property to reference it. If the subtests don't completely clean up after themselves, the subtests may affect one another.
The best way to refer to a connected p2p is use the object returned by `add_p2p_connection` like this:
```py
p2p_conn = node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
```
A good example is [p2p_invalid_locator.py](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/p2p_invalid_locator.py), which cleans up after itself (waits in both `wait_for_disconnect` and in `disconnect_p2ps`) but wouldn't need so much complexity if it just referenced the connections directly.
If there is only one connected, it's not really that tedious to just use `node.p2ps[0]` instead of `node.p2p` (and it can always be aliased inside the test itself).
ACKs for top commit:
robot-dreams:
utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d
jnewbery:
utACK 10d61505fe77880d6989115defa5e08417f3de2d
guggero:
Concept ACK 10d61505.
Tree-SHA512: 5965548929794ec660dae03467640cb2156d7d826cefd26d3a126472cbc2494b855c1d26bbb7b412281fbdc92b9798b9765a85c27bc1a97f7798f27f64db6f13
e15344889aac50aadee9211ac34e466867d5862b Clarify blocksonly whitelistforcerelay test (t-bast)
Pull request description:
As discussed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19943, this test may be a bit misleading to newcomers.
We underscore the fact that our peer needs to run a modified version of Bitcoin Core to actually relay transactions to a `blocksonly` node and benefit from the `whitelistforcerelay` parameter.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK e15344889aac50aadee9211ac34e466867d5862b
Tree-SHA512: cc3526ac26c40a2d878b0ad863008663040683fd21092fcdc93866c2b0a79db8c2d29767d1f70bf56195092fca2aa2961cdbee52b5f0b1ae757cece9cd206301
d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a [test] Remove final references to mininode (John Newbery)
5e8df3312e47a73e747ee892face55ed9ababeea test: resort imports (John Newbery)
85165d4332b0f72d30e0c584b476249b542338e6 scripted-diff: Rename mininode to p2p (John Newbery)
9e2897d020b114a10c860f90c5405be029afddba scripted-diff: Rename mininode_lock to p2p_lock (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
New contributors are often confused by the terminology in the test framework, and what the difference between a _node_ and a _peer_ is. To summarize:
- a 'node' is a bitcoind instance. This is the thing whose behavior is being tested. Each bitcoind node is managed by a python `TestNode` object which is used to start/stop the node, manage the node's data directory, read state about the node (eg process status, log file), and interact with the node over different interfaces.
- one of the interfaces that we can use to interact with the node is the p2p interface. Each connection to a node using this interface is managed by a python `P2PInterface` or derived object (which is owned by the `TestNode` object). We can open zero, one or many p2p connections to each bitcoind node. The node sees these connections as 'peers'.
For historic reasons, the word 'mininode' has been used to refer to those p2p interface objects that we use to connect to the bitcoind node (the code was originally taken from the 'mini-node' branch of https://github.com/jgarzik/pynode/tree/mini-node). However that name has proved to be confusing for new contributors, so rename the remaining references.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
ACK d5800da519
MarcoFalke:
ACK d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a 🚞
Tree-SHA512: 2c46c2ac3c4278b6e3c647cfd8108428a41e80788fc4f0e386e5b0c47675bc687d94779496c09a3e5ea1319617295be10c422adeeff2d2bd68378e00e0eeb5de
590bda79e876d9b959083105b8c7c41dd87706eb scripted-diff: Remove setup_clean_chain if default is not changed (Fabian Jahr)
98892f39e3d079c73bff7f2a5d5420fa95270497 doc: Improve setup_clean_chain documentation (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The first commit improves documentation on setup_clean_chain which is misunderstood quite frequently. Most importantly it fixes the TestShell docs which are simply incorrect.
The second commit removes the instances of `setup_clean_clain` in functional tests where it is not changing the default.
This used to be part of #19168 which also sought to rename`setup_clean_chain`.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 590bda79e876d9b959083105b8c7c41dd87706eb
Tree-SHA512: a7881186e65d31160b8f84107fb185973b37c6e50f190a85c6e2906a13a7472bb4efa9440bd37fe0a9ac5cd2d1e8559870a7e4380632d9a249eca8980b945f3e
fab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f doc: Use precise permission flags where possible (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Instead of mentioning the all-encompassing `-whitelist*` settings, change the docs to mention the exact permission flag that will influence the behaviour.
This is needed because in the future, the too-broad `-whitelist*` settings (they either include *all* permission flags or apply to *all* peers) might be deprecated to require the permission flags to be enumerated.
Alternatively, in the future there could be an RPC to set the net permission flags on an existing connection, in which case the `-whitelist*` terminology is of no help.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK fab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f
fjahr:
Code review ACK fab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f
jonatack:
ACK fab558612278909df93bdf88f5727b04f13aef0f
Tree-SHA512: c7dea3e577d90103bb2b0ffab7b7c8640b388932a3a880f69e2b70747fc9213dc1f437085671fd54c902ec2a578458b8a2fae6dbe076642fb88efbf9fa9e679c
0ea5d70b4756f376342417e0019490233cb4a918 Updated comment for the condition where a transaction relay is denied (glowang)
be01449cc8eb7bb97531a967f5d1dcc7b8865d1e Add test for param interaction b/w -blocksonly and -whitelistforcerelay (glowang)
Pull request description:
Related to: #18428
When -blocksonly is turned on, a node would still relay transactions from whitelisted peers. This funcitonality has not been tested.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0ea5d70b4756f376342417e0019490233cb4a918
Tree-SHA512: 4e99c88281cb518cc67f5f3be7171a7b413933047b5d24a04bb3ff2210a82e914d69079f64cd5bac9206ec435e21a622c8e69cedbc2ccb39d2328ac5c01668e5
* Remove unused variable
* [refactor] Move tx relay state to separate structure
* [refactor] Change tx_relay structure to be unique_ptr
* Check that tx_relay is initialized before access
* Add comment explaining intended use of m_tx_relay
* Add 2 outbound block-relay-only connections
Transaction relay is primarily optimized for balancing redundancy/robustness
with bandwidth minimization -- as a result transaction relay leaks information
that adversaries can use to infer the network topology.
Network topology is better kept private for (at least) two reasons:
(a) Knowledge of the network graph can make it easier to find the source IP of
a given transaction.
(b) Knowledge of the network graph could be used to split a target node or
nodes from the honest network (eg by knowing which peers to attack in order to
achieve a network split).
We can eliminate the risks of (b) by separating block relay from transaction
relay; inferring network connectivity from the relay of blocks/block headers is
much more expensive for an adversary.
After this commit, bitcoind will make 2 additional outbound connections that
are only used for block relay. (In the future, we might consider rotating our
transaction-relay peers to help limit the effects of (a).)
* Don't relay addr messages to block-relay-only peers
We don't want relay of addr messages to leak information about
these network links.
* doc: improve comments relating to block-relay-only peers
* Disconnect peers violating blocks-only mode
If we set fRelay=false in our VERSION message, and a peer sends an INV or TX
message anyway, disconnect. Since we use fRelay=false to minimize bandwidth,
we should not tolerate remaining connected to a peer violating the protocol.
* net_processing. Removed comment + fixed formatting
* Refactoring net_processing, removed duplicated code
* Refactor some bool in a many-arguments function to enum
It's made to avoid possible typos with arguments, because some of them have default values and it's very high probability to make a mistake here.
* Added UI debug option for Outbound
* Fixed data race related to `setInventoryTxToSend`, introduced in `[refactor] Move tx relay state to separate structure`
Co-authored-by: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
fa8ced32a60dea37ac169241cf9a1f708ef46c4b doc: Mention blocksonly in reduce-traffic.md, unhide option (MarcoFalke)
fa320de79faaca2b088fcbe7f76701faa9bff236 test: Add test for p2p_blocksonly (MarcoFalke)
fa3872e7b4540857261aed948b94b6b2bfdbc3d1 test: Format predicate source as multiline on error (MarcoFalke)
fa1dce7329d3e74d46ab98b93772b1832a3f1819 net: Rename ::fRelayTxes to ::g_relay_txes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is de-facto no longer hidden
ACKs for commit fa8ced:
jamesob:
utACK fa8ced32a6
Tree-SHA512: 474fbdee6cbd035ed9068a066b6056c1f909ec7520be0417820fcd1672ab3069b53f55c5147968978d9258fd3a3933fe1a9ef8e4f6e14fb6ebbd79701a0a1245
