Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Konstantin Akimov
559190fb27 docs: dashification of guix 2023-04-15 12:13:27 -05:00
fanquake
6d8be28053 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22643: guix-verify: Non-zero exit code when anything fails
d451b60d22576dff7a2c8d6a8b5880d9d69e397c guix-verify: Non-zero exit code when anything fails (Carl Dong)

Pull request description:

  ```
  Previously, if verification fails, the correct message will be printed,
  but the exit code would still be 0.
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK d451b60d22576dff7a2c8d6a8b5880d9d69e397c

Tree-SHA512: 695d72121f308d8a66db780eca16878fb378b4d766de5b58c2d6f778c5661a2f7bdf37a96e8e8e283b0a46b5d55f24bca05fa7509aa1822f0854c50064200572
2023-03-26 16:50:26 -05:00
fanquake
56d2bc249b Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22182: guix: Overhaul how guix-{attest,verify} works and hierarchy
e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226 guix-attest: Error out if SHA256SUMS is unexpected (Carl Dong)
4cc35daed557f38b080360a89036b2e97a6f78c2 Rewrite guix-{attest,verify} for new hier (Carl Dong)
28a9c9b83924f585b397f0f3b8e9e73780ac0ad6 Make SHA256SUMS fragment right after build (Carl Dong)

Pull request description:

  Based on:  #22075
  Code reviewers: I recommend reading the new `guix-{attest,verify}` files instead of trying to read the diff

  The following changes resolve many usability improvements which were pointed out to me:
  1. Some maintainers like to extract their "uncodesigned tarball" inside the `output/` directory, resulting in the older `guix-attest` mistakenly attesting to the extracted contents
  2. Maintainers whose GPG keys reside on an external smartcard often need to physically interact with the smartcard as a way to approve the signing operation, having one signature per platform means a lot of fidgeting
  3. Maintainers wishing to sign on a separate machine now has the option of transferring only a subtree of `output/`, namely `output/*/SHA256SUMS.part`, in order to perform a signature (you may need to specify an `$OUTDIR_BASE` env var)
  4. An `all.SHA256SUMS` file should be usable as the base `SHA256SUMS` in bitcoin core torrents and on the release server.

  For those who sign on an separate machine than the one you do builds on, the following steps will work:
  1. `env GUIX_SIGS_REPO=/home/achow101/guix.sigs SIGNER=achow101 NO_SIGN=1 ./contrib/guix/guix-attest`
  2. Copy `/home/achow101/guix.sigs/<tag>/achow101` (which does not yet have signatures) to signing machine
  3. Sign the `SHA256SUMS` files:
      ```bash
      for i in "<path-to-achow101>/*.SHA256SUMS"; do
          gpg --detach-sign --local-user "<your-key-here>" --armor --output "$i"{.asc,}
      done
      ```
  5. Upload `<path-to-achow101>` (now with signatures) to `guix.sigs`

  -----

  After this change, output directories will now include a `SHA256SUMS.part` fragment, created immediately after a successful build:
  ```
  output
  └── x86_64-w64-mingw32
      ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip
      ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
      ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip
      ├── bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz
      └── SHA256SUMS.part
  ```

  These `SHA256SUMS.part` fragments look something like:
  ```
  3ebd7262b1a0a5bb757fef1f70e7e14033c70f98c059bc4dbfee5d1992b25825  dist-archive/bitcoin-4e069f7589da.tar.gz
  def2e7d3de5ab3e3f955344e75151df4f33713f9101f5295bd13c9375bdf633b  x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-debug.zip
  643049fe3ee4a4e83a1739607e67b11b7c9b1a66208a6f35a9ff634ba795500e  x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
  a247a1ccec0ccc2e138c648284bd01f6a761f2d8d6d07d91b5b4a6670ec3f288  x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win-unsigned.tar.gz
  fab76a836dcc592e39c04fd2396696633fb6eb56e39ecbf6c909bd173ed4280c  x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-4e069f7589da-win64.zip
  ```

  Meaning that they are valid `SHA256SUMS` files when `sha256sum --check`'d at the `guix-build-*/output` directory level

  When `guix-attest` is invoked, these `SHA256SUMS.part` files are combined and sorted (by `-k2`, `LC_ALL=C`) to create:

  1. `noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all non-codesigned outputs, and
  3. `all.SHA256SUMS` for a manifest of all outputs including non-codesigned outputs

  Then both files are signed, resulting in the following `guix.sigs` hierarchy:
  ```
  4e069f7589da/
  └── dongcarl
      ├── all.SHA256SUMS
      ├── all.SHA256SUMS.asc
      ├── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS
      └── noncodesigned.SHA256SUMS.asc
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226
  hebasto:
    ACK e2c40a4ed5272d72fea997bd936fba28bb753226, tested on Linux Mint 20.1 (x86_64) with and w/o `NO_SIGN=1`. Changes in `contrib/guix/libexec/codesign.sh` and `contrib/guix/guix-verify` are reviewed only.

Tree-SHA512: 618aacefb0eb6595735a9ab6a98ea6598fce65f9ccf33fa1e7ef93bf140c0f6cfc16e34870c6aa3e4777dd3f004b92a82a994141879870141742df948ec59c1f
2023-03-26 16:50:26 -05:00
W. J. van der Laan
f95b802504 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21462: guix: Add guix-{attest,verify} scripts
d420e5c1c015f58d07aca4d6a805086488f74d03 guix-attest: Avoid incomplete sigdirs with ERR traps (Carl Dong)
feda2c8e3180cb983c35976d4440cea23a155b7f guix: Skip attesting to dist-archive (Carl Dong)
d522d8006b891eccd7901faf391f9c041ddf8e38 guix: Attest to inputs in inputs.SHA256SUMS (Carl Dong)
f9e2960c018103be756a7f8a506816b49d662514 guix: Construct $OUTDIR in ${DISTSRC}/output (Carl Dong)
022abc85fc7e711a900fed8e5071919a151c0a63 guix: Minor quoting fix in libexec/build.sh (Carl Dong)
c83c4fa5b78aef33bba36b3a0d273422297bd630 guix-attest: Allow skipping GPG signing with NO_SIGN (Carl Dong)
0e1c2e448c25568f276e4f022128870c76ca216b guix-attest: Use ascii-armor signatures (Carl Dong)
b5fd89c4c89136007429688601ce4fa497f5f09e guix-attest: Only use cross-platform flags for find+xargs (Carl Dong)
5926432ba68ba154df6c8eaa74adb18cc0123167 guix: Add guix-verify script (Carl Dong)
30daf76a97c57a5f74c8dad1da282dcc0ff8b3fb guix: Add guix-attest script (Carl Dong)

Pull request description:

  Adds replacements for `gsign` and `gverify`.

  Personally I'm not a big fan of using the word "sign" as it's been used to refer to both codesigning and GPG signing.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review and tested ACK d420e5c1c015f58d07aca4d6a805086488f74d03

Tree-SHA512: 93d82d201f4596eaea0e3825aa55b013dfb91790e6ccee79893833d37921513d7b4e735f0641103e1e2ea8308abe4cb6218b73160924708802f2e0e3f7f6caf1
2023-03-26 16:50:26 -05:00