2ab561d281 partial bitcoin#27254: Extract util/fs from util/system (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
280988bee3 merge bitcoin#27418: Remove windows workaround in authproxy (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
a497df0339 merge bitcoin#26832: move (win) S_* defines into bdb (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
db676a7e5f merge bitcoin#26814: remove windows-only compat.h usage in random (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
94e6637c33 merge bitcoin#26826: remove windows-only compat.h usage in randomenv (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
bbb0cceb7a merge bitcoin#25493: document code in compat.h (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
3f143096c8 merge bitcoin#25422: globally define NOMINMAX when building with mingw-w64 (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
000495df8e merge bitcoin#25338: Avoid incompatibility with CMake AUTOUIC feature (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
714ea55dbe build: migrate stacktrace-related flags to `DEBUG_`{`C`,`CXX`}`FLAGS` (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
11323c3851 merge bitcoin#24391: stop overriding user autoconf flags (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
548121d366 merge bitcoin#24704: remove strnlen back-compat code (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
b65038ec94 merge bitcoin#23005: Delay wallet client construction (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
f3b065cd9c merge bitcoin#23092: Remove Windows workaround in authproxy (WinError 10053) (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* This PR originally included [bitcoin#27378](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27378) but including it caused multiple tests to fail ([build](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/8577987174#L2224)), even after adjusting `timeout`. It has been omitted instead.
<details>
<summary>Test failures:</summary>
```
feature_abortnode.py | Failed | 201 s
feature_dip3_v19.py | Failed | 237 s
feature_llmq_rotation.py | Failed | 54 s
p2p_invalid_messages.py | Failed | 5 s
rpc_bind.py --nonloopback | Failed | 63 s
wallet_multiwallet.py --descriptors | Failed | 79 s
wallet_multiwallet.py --legacy-wallet | Failed | 89 s
ALL | Failed | 8540 s (accumulated)
```
</details>
<details>
<summary>feature_abortnode.py failure:</summary>
```
dash@107cfae2b2b5:/src/dash$ ./test/functional/feature_abortnode.py
2024-12-09T18:31:01.776000Z TestFramework (INFO): PRNG seed is: 6843309100291447752
2024-12-09T18:31:01.776000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/dash_func_test_fcijb99n
2024-12-09T18:31:02.802000Z TestFramework (INFO): Waiting for crash
2024-12-09T18:34:23.026000Z TestFramework.utils (ERROR): wait_until() failed. Predicate: ''''
def is_node_stopped(self):
"""Checks whether the node has stopped.
Returns True if the node has stopped. False otherwise.
This method is responsible for freeing resources (self.process)."""
if not self.running:
return True
return_code = self.process.poll()
if return_code is None:
return False
# process has stopped. Assert that it didn't return an error code.
assert return_code == 0, self._node_msg(
"Node returned non-zero exit code (%d) when stopping" % return_code)
self.running = False
self.process = None
self.rpc_connected = False
self.rpc = None
self.log.debug("Node stopped")
return True
'''
2024-12-09T18:34:23.027000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 161, in main
self.run_test()
File "/src/dash/./test/functional/feature_abortnode.py", line 44, in run_test
self.nodes[0].wait_until_stopped(timeout=200)
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 414, in wait_until_stopped
wait_until_helper(self.is_node_stopped, timeout=timeout, timeout_factor=self.timeout_factor)
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 287, in wait_until_helper
raise AssertionError("Predicate {} not true after {} seconds".format(predicate_source, timeout))
AssertionError: Predicate ''''
def is_node_stopped(self):
"""Checks whether the node has stopped.
Returns True if the node has stopped. False otherwise.
This method is responsible for freeing resources (self.process)."""
if not self.running:
return True
return_code = self.process.poll()
if return_code is None:
return False
# process has stopped. Assert that it didn't return an error code.
assert return_code == 0, self._node_msg(
"Node returned non-zero exit code (%d) when stopping" % return_code)
self.running = False
self.process = None
self.rpc_connected = False
self.rpc = None
self.log.debug("Node stopped")
return True
''' not true after 200.0 seconds
2024-12-09T18:34:23.530000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
2024-12-09T18:34:23.530000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Unexpected exception caught during shutdown
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 341, in shutdown
self.stop_nodes()
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 673, in stop_nodes
node.stop_node(expected_stderr=expected_stderr, wait=wait, wait_until_stopped=False)
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 368, in stop_node
self.stop(wait=wait)
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/coverage.py", line 49, in __call__
return_val = self.auth_service_proxy_instance.__call__(*args, **kwargs)
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/authproxy.py", line 124, in __call__
response, status = self._request('POST', self.__url.path, postdata.encode('utf-8'))
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/authproxy.py", line 103, in _request
return self._get_response()
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/authproxy.py", line 162, in _get_response
raise JSONRPCException(
test_framework.authproxy.JSONRPCException: non-JSON HTTP response with '503 Service Unavailable' from server (-342)
2024-12-09T18:34:23.531000Z TestFramework (WARNING): Not cleaning up dir /tmp/dash_func_test_fcijb99n
2024-12-09T18:34:23.531000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Test failed. Test logging available at /tmp/dash_func_test_fcijb99n/test_framework.log
2024-12-09T18:34:23.531000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
2024-12-09T18:34:23.531000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Hint: Call /src/dash/test/functional/combine_logs.py '/tmp/dash_func_test_fcijb99n' to consolidate all logs
2024-12-09T18:34:23.531000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
2024-12-09T18:34:23.531000Z TestFramework (ERROR): If this failure happened unexpectedly or intermittently, please file a bug and provide a link or upload of the combined log.
2024-12-09T18:34:23.531000Z TestFramework (ERROR): https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues
2024-12-09T18:34:23.531000Z TestFramework (ERROR):
[node 1] Cleaning up leftover process
[node 0] Cleaning up leftover process
```
</details>
* [bitcoin#27254](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27254) has been partially backported to include a missing header to allow it to build.
<details>
<summary>Compile error:</summary>
```
In file included from ./util/system.h:19,
from util/system.cpp:7:
./compat/assumptions.h:49:22: error: 'size_t' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'std::size_t'?
49 | static_assert(sizeof(size_t) == 4 || sizeof(size_t) == 8, "size_t assumed to be 32-bit or 64-bit");
| ^~~~~~
| std::size_t
In file included from /usr/include/c++/11/limits:42,
from ./compat/assumptions.h:11,
from ./util/system.h:19,
from util/system.cpp:7:
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/c++/11/bits/c++config.h:280:33: note: 'std::size_t' declared here
280 | typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
| ^~~~~~
```
</details>
* ~~GitLab job failures as of 2339ae6459cad77d94795c0e92ba3f3fe31c485a, for `linux64-build` ([source](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/8590291130#L4621)), `linux64_cxx20-build` ([source](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/8590291134#L3497)) and `linux64_sqlite-build` ([source](https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/8590291137#L3489)) are not related to failures in compilation or unit tests but are to do with reaching the artifact limit.~~ Resolved with [dash#6487](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6487), thanks Udjin!
## Breaking Changes
None expected.
## Checklist
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 2ab561d281
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 2ab561d281
Tree-SHA512: 6d05305f17fd607ed93b4a2e00de195a96bde1a34bedf04f6dd84892dc71028ae71590fa5063026ec7ff728d6e411af410c363b4a88947ce6e5999d4431bb29b
2e509b96c4 fix: add a workaround for RPC getmerkleblocks, debug, coinjoinsalt, voteraw (Konstantin Akimov)
f0decc8790 feat: add unit test for ClearDiscouraged (Konstantin Akimov)
865b24ea00 feat: hide cleardiscouraged RPC so far as it no intent to use by regular users (Konstantin Akimov)
1f5fa7e7cf feat: enable linter coverage for functional tests (Konstantin Akimov)
59ddac5656 feat: hide deprecated RPC from help and add TODOes to remove them (Konstantin Akimov)
05732aceaf feat: implement functional tests for RPC getblockheaders (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash-issues/issues/63
## What was done?
Add functional tests for `getblockheaders`
Hide RPC `cleardiscouraged` (as it is used only for functional tests) and RPC `getpoolinfo` (deprecated long time ago)
Add a workaround to ignore these RPCs `getmerkleblocks`, `voteraw`, `debug`, `coinjoinsalt` at the moment
Enables linter for coverage
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run locally with `test/functional/test_runner.py -j20 --previous-releases --coverage --extended`
Enabled in CI
## Breaking Changes
N/A if hidding `cleardiscouraged` is not a breaking change.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
LGTM, utACK 2e509b96c4
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 2e509b96c4
Tree-SHA512: bb31465d9a71ef824533d9310393d89293c87c7407ec3e37697f6d36dc6c010381a6e0408f9598354e610d51ef662485d8a653cc0e198842e2198ac1c30c90f1
c6f23a718c merge bitcoin#31383: Add missing node.setmocktime(self.mocktime) to p2p_ibd_stalling.py (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
9072a10754 merge bitcoin#30545: fix intermittent failures in feature_proxy.py (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7e2d435e35 merge bitcoin#29483: add --v1transport option, add --v2transport to a CI task (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7e59a965f8 merge bitcoin#29452: document that BIP324 on by default (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
0f3b5e081e merge bitcoin#29353: adhere to typical VERSION message protocol flow (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
dfdddfd2ff rpc: enable `v2transport` for `masternode connect` when capable (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
3c1636174b merge bitcoin#29356: make v2transport arg in addconnection mandatory and few cleanups (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
c53cd93aee merge bitcoin#29347: enable v2transport by default (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7dcf561306 merge bitcoin#27452: cover addrv2 anchors by adding TorV3 to CAddress in messages.py (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* When backporting [bitcoin#27452](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27452) in `feature_anchors.py`, `P2P_SERVICES` (`NODE_NETWORK | NODE_HEADERS_COMPRESSED`) has been replaced with `NODE_NETWORK` as the former evaluates to a value greater than `256` (specifically `2049`), which causes test failure. The replacement value is acceptable as `NODE_NETWORK` is the desired service flag expected by Dash Core ([source](779e4295ad/src/protocol.cpp (L249-L254))).
<details>
<summary>Test failure:</summary>
```
dash@89afd55ae77e:/src/dash$ ./test/functional/feature_anchors.py
2024-12-14T12:31:22.244000Z TestFramework (INFO): PRNG seed is: 8365703189892653614
2024-12-14T12:31:22.244000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/dash_func_test_j0ya02yu
2024-12-14T12:31:22.776000Z TestFramework (INFO): When node starts, check if anchors.dat doesn't exist
2024-12-14T12:31:22.776000Z TestFramework (INFO): Add 2 block-relay-only connections to node
2024-12-14T12:31:24.781000Z TestFramework (INFO): Add 5 inbound connections to node
2024-12-14T12:31:29.843000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check node connections
2024-12-14T12:31:30.848000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check the addresses in anchors.dat
2024-12-14T12:31:30.848000Z TestFramework (INFO): Perturb anchors.dat to test it doesn't throw an error during initialization
2024-12-14T12:31:31.356000Z TestFramework (INFO): When node starts, check if anchors.dat doesn't exist anymore
2024-12-14T12:31:31.357000Z TestFramework (INFO): Ensure addrv2 support
2024-12-14T12:31:32.364000Z TestFramework (INFO): Add 256-bit-address block-relay-only connections to node
2024-12-14T12:31:33.368000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check for addrv2 addresses in anchors.dat
2024-12-14T12:31:33.369000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Unexpected exception caught during testing
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/dash/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 161, in main
self.run_test()
File "/src/dash/./test/functional/feature_anchors.py", line 135, in run_test
new_data[services_index] = P2P_SERVICES
ValueError: byte must be in range(0, 256)
2024-12-14T12:31:33.870000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
2024-12-14T12:31:33.871000Z TestFramework (WARNING): Not cleaning up dir /tmp/dash_func_test_j0ya02yu
2024-12-14T12:31:33.871000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Test failed. Test logging available at /tmp/dash_func_test_j0ya02yu/test_framework.log
```
</details>
## Breaking Changes
None expected.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK c6f23a718c
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK c6f23a718c81b7c574ba3fecbe52f342eda35a46;
Tree-SHA512: ca134432d000d521827a20c75c03913421fe52a31fda1cbf632e0b207c31728406feb090469d592d8e2fd8d64298faa2752ff703de79f737a62c276c6a231097
5b914fe081 refactor: add const to llmq_ctx, isman, clhandler in rpc code (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## What was done?
Add missing const for all usages of llmq_ctx, llmq_ctx->isman and llmq_ctx->clhandler in rpc code.
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Added `const` helps to read rpc code to see that none of mentioned objects are actually changed.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit and functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 5b914fe081
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 5b914fe081
Tree-SHA512: dfaa99887250638e90f0c87271cf3c70833d4199797050be6a8b84939f78d857419a3e9e3da73035aca10e27782f28f43f156c69380d1c8df892c97c468c76d7
a275bda266 refactor: removed duplicated code with errors messages for txindex, timestampindex, spentindex (Konstantin Akimov)
dd1b36636c feat: show human friendly error if missing spentindex, txindex or addressindex (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Currently user receive error `Unable to get spent info` or even worse `No information available for address` which doesn't say anything about required extra indexes.
Also, every call of RPC `getrawtransaction` causes this error logs on high level if spent index is disabled, but actually it just means that no couple extra fields are hidden in output which is expected if no index.
node0 2024-12-03T18:54:33.349605Z [ http] [httpserver.cpp:248] [http_request_cb] [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:40052
node0 2024-12-03T18:54:33.349634Z [httpworker.3] [rpc/request.cpp:180] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=getrawtransaction user=__cookie__
node0 2024-12-03T18:54:33.349729Z [httpworker.3] [util/system.h:57] [error] ERROR: Spent index not enabled
node0 2024-12-03T18:54:33.349735Z [httpworker.3] [util/system.h:57] [error] ERROR: Spent index not enabled
node0 2024-12-03T18:54:33.349738Z [httpworker.3] [util/system.h:57] [error] ERROR: Spent index not enabled
node0 2024-12-03T18:54:33.349808Z [httpworker.3] [httprpc.cpp:93] [~RpcHttpRequest] [bench] HTTP RPC request handled: user=__cookie__ command=getrawtransaction external=false status=200 elapsed_time_ms=0
node0 2024-12-03T18:54:33.349998Z [ http] [httpserver.cpp:248] [http_request_cb] [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:40052
node0 2024-12-03T18:54:33.350027Z [httpworker.0] [rpc/request.cpp:180] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=getrawtransaction user=__cookie__
node0 2024-12-03T18:54:33.350128Z [httpworker.0] [util/system.h:57] [error] ERROR: Spent index not enabled
node0 2024-12-03T18:54:33.350133Z [httpworker.0] [util/system.h:57] [error] ERROR: Spent index not enabled
node0 2024-12-03T18:54:33.350137Z [httpworker.0] [util/system.h:57] [error] ERROR: Spent index not enabled
## What was done?
Improved all usages of extra indexes `spentindex`, `txindex` and `addressindex` in RPC implementation.
Affected RPCc:
- getaddressmempool
- getaddressutxos
- getaddressdeltas
- getaddressbalance
- getaddresstxids
- getspentinfo
- getblockhashes
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit&functional tests.
```
$ dash-cli getaddressutxos '["yW4kiSd2pytXC2erbjm6crt1PGBvbwS4YX"]'
Address index is disabled. You should run Dash Core with -addressindex (requires reindex) (code -32600)
```
Check logs after calling getrawtransaction:
```
node0 2024-12-03T19:10:00.378770Z [httpworker.3] [rpc/request.cpp:180] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=getrawtransaction user=__cookie__
node0 2024-12-03T19:10:00.378861Z [httpworker.3] [httprpc.cpp:93] [~RpcHttpRequest] [bench] HTTP RPC request handled: user=__cookie__ command=getrawtransaction external=false status=500 elapsed_time_ms=0
node0 2024-12-03T19:10:00.379017Z [ http] [httpserver.cpp:248] [http_request_cb] [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:44984
node0 2024-12-03T19:10:00.379036Z [httpworker.0] [rpc/request.cpp:180] [parse] [rpc] ThreadRPCServer method=getrawtransaction user=__cookie__
node0 2024-12-03T19:10:00.379090Z [httpworker.0] [httprpc.cpp:93] [~RpcHttpRequest] [bench] HTTP RPC request handled: user=__cookie__ command=getrawtransaction external=false status=500 elapsed_time_ms=0
node0 2024-12-03T19:10:00.379240Z [ http] [httpserver.cpp:248] [http_request_cb] [http] Received a POST request for / from 127.0.0.1:44984
```
## Breaking Changes
Error type and message changed. It's no more `RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY` but `RPC_INVALID_REQUEST`.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
kwvg:
utACK a275bda266
UdjinM6:
utACK a275bda266
Tree-SHA512: d53373aba794035173375811e333e940efb1081bed46e18846b2b54d60036ee52487c65f9b84ac687b2be2a30f3a68fb75afbb2c89e52b0774740892863a04df
e905ae0f4b merge bitcoin#25499: Use steady clock for all millis bench logging (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
492654db49 merge bitcoin#24662: Use system time instead of adjusted network time (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
bc3ec30144 merge bitcoin#24697: refactor address relay time (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
730cdf241a test: remove leftovers missed in bitcoin#25514 (dash#6097) (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
c7cb26ba05 merge bitcoin#25456: Use steady_clock for getrpcinfo durations (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
ea3c727e02 merge bitcoin#25245: Remove no-op TIME_INIT on deser (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
2d33cfba41 merge bitcoin#25101: Add mockable clock type (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
ccde10b914 merge bitcoin#25157: Fix -rpcwait with -netinfo returning negative time durations (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
484447cc86 merge bitcoin#25100: Switch scheduler to steady_clock (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
cc7d2b8d0a merge bitcoin#25102: Remove unused GetTimeSeconds (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
8f8e73242d net: use `GetTime<T>()` in leftover `GetTimeSeconds()` usage (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
b114718240 merge bitcoin#18642: Use std::chrono for the time to rotate destination of addr messages + tests (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Breaking Changes
None expected.
## Checklist
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK e905ae0f4b
UdjinM6:
utACK e905ae0f4b
Tree-SHA512: 022b8fac41315726e622b887ef5f5f5d011c947048d144f6f54c7c596d9e90286b77ec6f91dfc9bdb60ecc21dfa791afe4aba3d97f962eb1e86cd750831275bd
c005011e84 perf: NodesSnapshot, do not hold m_nodes_mutex while shuffling (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Upstream, as expected, only holds m_nodes_mutex while needed. We hold it a bit too long 36f5effa17/src/net.h (L1628-L1640)
Not sure how this got introduced. I also don't expect this to be a major contention savior, as there is only one instance in ThreadMessageHandler where we actually do shuffle, but still, might as well fix.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
builds
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
kwvg:
utACK c005011e84
UdjinM6:
utACK c005011e84
Tree-SHA512: 76a848ace9a746c851e0fc1f66def92d67da92e9f295b7aade5a23f7d76b3eb3c28b7a6ac9d04df6dc252c1f1d9fae364821e9416a1f003a2905a30fc51eb41f
43778b07f5 refactor: pass CWallet reference to CTransactionBuilder (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Follow-up for #6441
## What was done?
Pass reference to CWallet instead const reference to smart pointer with CWallet to CTransactionBuilder.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 43778b07f5
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 43778b07f5
Tree-SHA512: 81451c714ae3fcf695924da1cd578e832ad48fa678dddd67df12a9f4ffcfdfc4522e34977d3e86efc01eb70cfe5359c752c23db0502f1cd9bae2be59587a1c86
906c2d79ba refactor: add annotation gsl::not_null for ConstructCreditPool (Konstantin Akimov)
f1905ca950 fix: intermittent missing of PoSe ban in feature_llmq_simplepose.py (Konstantin Akimov)
cf84dffc9f fix: bump time for all nodes during mine_quorum in feature_llmq_rotation.py test (Konstantin Akimov)
efd4701d30 fix: intermittent error for feature_llmq_simplepose due to rotating quorums (Konstantin Akimov)
2bafadfc34 feat: put DIP0024 activation to block 1 on RegTest (Konstantin Akimov)
632c4c4bcd feat: re-bury DIP0024 with new height when quorums actually appeared (Konstantin Akimov)
343c74b779 fix: intermittent error in feature_index_prune due to DKG influence (Konstantin Akimov)
de821b9b15 refactor: remove command line argument -bip147height, -dip8params (Konstantin Akimov)
d8ce0a74fa docs: updated comment for DIP0003 activation on RegTest (Konstantin Akimov)
4dafec870c fix: add check that DIP0003 activated before retrieving CbTx for CreditPool (Konstantin Akimov)
26e9813672 fix: assertion in Credit Pool validation during connecting blocks (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This PR is 7th in the achieving ultimate goal to activate old forks from block 1.
It helps to run unit and functional tests faster; it helps for platform's dev-environment to start faster.
## What was done?
Prior work: #6187, #6189, #6214, #6225, #6269, #6275
This PR:
- simplify DIP0024 activation and activate it from block 1 at RegTest
- removes command lines arguments: -bip147height, -dip8params
- fixed intermittent errors in feature_index_prune.py and feature_llmq_simplepose.py
- fix assertion crash on Regtest if using strange combination of -testactivationheight and -dip3params
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit, functional tests.
## Breaking Changes
[regtest only] -dip8params, -bip147height are removed.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 906c2d79ba
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 906c2d79ba
Tree-SHA512: fab8a9bc03bb7f220c19dd952a03f8fec0b6ef1362d7308eb77c90e0ba814a241bb2bf36beccf78bb285ede1b6d85ec52fa19b3729ac9b643b420d13fbb63b47
1d36a4026c 80%+: it, pl, th, zh_CN (UdjinM6)
adfdb5998c 90%+: fr (UdjinM6)
bfff3c9c76 100%: ru (UdjinM6)
ed5f02db9f en (UdjinM6)
d373f85f6b dashstrings.cpp (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 1d36a4026c
Tree-SHA512: 5d860d2d78e354eeae2157e5d40e8ff659963a258b9eb216d15ec72c1c589e254c2f246173be9e3d1892f9c18acae6cfecc1f18956460be5ff13c5c84d6d0ba6
09058e0d71 feat: mnauth always use basic scheme (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Currently, mnauth has to check status of v19 hard fork. While this isn't soo terrible, it's not needed anymore. On mainnet or testnet, any mn you possible connect to will have it's TIP past v19 HF, meaning in practice it will only ever send you basic scheme anyhow. Let's just harden it. I initially guarded this behind a new protocol version, but I do not think that is needed.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
This is potentially a breaking change for devnets, which are moving past the v19 hard fork, but on develop v19 activates at block 2 for devnets sooooo, this shouldn't be noticed.
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 09058e0d71
knst:
utACK 09058e0d71
Tree-SHA512: 45483904135c90a507f2a1f61c4b06915eb7c02a29eeda254938624a2593aec86540fa360aea498428285b3c0e954c676510dcb128f4ec7062302293c134d517
e08068687c fix: don't shrink window when setting minimum width (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Closes https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5886
* We've been setting restrictions on the width of the window since [dash#3734](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/3734) (see d351fca6a6 and c0447b0bc6), meaning, the behavior as described in [dash#5886](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5886) has been present since v0.16 (v0.15 and earlier used the old UI design).
* We do not set any restrictions on height and in that respect, Dash Qt will behave similar to Bitcoin Qt in that it can be resized to be arbitrarily small.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Crossed compiled for `x86_64-w64-mingw32` and tested resulting `dash-qt.exe` on Windows 11 22H2 (Build 22621.431). Followed reproduction steps as mentioned in [dash#5886](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5886), found width to persist even after closing Options modal using buttons and the close button on the top right.
## Breaking Changes
None expected.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
generally utACK e08068687c
UdjinM6:
utACK e08068687c
Tree-SHA512: ed3874c830c0ddf1a9e1166b75e3088969b7dfae8bca25af47045727e14a270ca2bb740e2c30b657b26a4b8e542dff8d898e5d5d2c9482d67da15578e0054632
a4378fc2ff fix(qt): emit dataChanged for the whole model in TransactionTableModel (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Somehow a 500k+ txes wallet is MUCH more responsive with this patch. I'm not sure if it's macos only or not though, pls test.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run a wallet with 100k+ txes in it and send a tx or try changing units.
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
ACK a4378fc2ff
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK a4378fc2ff
Tree-SHA512: eb0116f99f145ee131bd4a69895c9384dc26fc113ee034a2af74a92b0770b33631455a79e5826dc004f922ac182481eb26c54255274e186a47da3796da9550a6
7d26061170 refactor: move `CConnman`, `PeerManager` out of `CCoinJoinClientQueueManager` ctor (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
953ba96ac9 refactor: move `CConnman` out of `CoinJoinWalletManager` ctor (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
ac930a84d8 refactor: remove unused `CConnman` from `CDeterministicMNManager` ctor (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
a14e604064 refactor: remove `CConnman`, `PeerManager` from `LLMQContext` ctor (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
d9e5cc7c9a refactor: move `PeerManager` out of `CInstantSendManager` ctor (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
82d1aed1d6 refactor: move `CConnman`, `PeerManager` out of `CSigSharesManager` ctor (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7498a38076 refactor: move `PeerManager` out of `CSigningManager` ctor (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7ebc61e375 refactor: move `CConnman` out of `CQuorumManager` ctor (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
c07b522baa refactor: move `CConnman` out of `CDKGSession{,Handler,Manager}` ctor (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
01876c7e56 refactor: move `PeerManager` out of `CDKGSession{,Handler,Manager}` ctor (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
cc0e771c29 refactor: start BLS thread in `LLMQContext` ctor, move `Start` downwards (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Depends on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6425
* Dependency for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6304
* In order to reduce the logic used in chainstate initialization (that will be split out of `init.cpp` in [bitcoin#23280](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23280)), the spinning up of threads (as done in `LLMQContext::Start()`) needs to be moved down.
* They were moved up in [dash#5752](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5752) as `CBLSWorker` is a part of `LLMQContext` and `CBLSWorker` is needed during chainstate verification. As suggested in dash#5752, an alternate fix to the one already merged in was to move `CBLSWorker` `Start()`/`Stop()` to the constructor, which is done here.
* Another alternate fix is that we move it out of `LLMQContext` entirely and let it remain in `NodeContext` though this approach has not been taken.
* The reason we cannot retain the status quo is because `bitcoin-chainstate` (the binary introduced in [bitcoin#24304](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24304) that's built on the code split off in [bitcoin#23280](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23280)) aims to be devoid of P2P logic and this is reflected in the source files used to build it ([source](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24304/files#diff-4cb884d03ebb901069e4ee5de5d02538c40dd9b39919c615d8eaa9d364bbbd77R794)). (Also, there's no `NodeContext`, [source](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24304/files#diff-4cb884d03ebb901069e4ee5de5d02538c40dd9b39919c615d8eaa9d364bbbd77R795-R798))
* This means need to separate P2P and validation components from Dash-specific logic in order for the split to work as expected. This PR is a step in that direction by moving P2P elements (`CConnman` and `PeerManager`) out of constructors.
* As it stands, there are two sources for Dash-specific components to have access to P2P components, initialization (e.g. through `LLMQContext::Start()` or `PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage()`).
## Breaking Changes
None expected. While changes are present in initialization order, consensus behaviour should remain unchanged.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 7d26061170
UdjinM6:
utACK 7d26061170
Tree-SHA512: 4f12cbda935cad3a186acb31fed513cea489b0d3a55aa80be8e1336d10cbe1579d6d3db862a78a167134650c9e97816732acaf0c85ab759f6555b1b6be99ec02
fixup: drop CChain from mnauth ProcessMessage
feat: let RPC mnauth to generate only BASIC bls messages and fixes for rpc_mnauth.py and p2p_quorum_data.py
refactor: drop unused ConstCBLSPublicKeyVersionWrapper
