dash/contrib/containers/deploy
PastaPastaPasta 3855f9775e
chore: do not include dash-qt in the docker images (#5775)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Remove dash-qt from docker images; save ~41MB

## What was done?


## How Has This Been Tested?
Hasn't

## Breaking Changes
I guess in theory someone could've been relying on dash-qt from docker 🤷

## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
2023-12-21 21:59:01 -06:00
..
docker-entrypoint.sh chore: add missing copyrights via copyright_header.py insert 2023-01-13 00:49:04 +03:00
Dockerfile ci: harmonize parent images, use focal consistently 2023-05-11 09:18:48 -05:00
Dockerfile.GitHubActions.Dispatch docker: fix gitian support, optimize container layer count and improve script consistency (#4983) 2022-08-22 22:42:36 +03:00
Dockerfile.GitHubActions.Release chore: do not include dash-qt in the docker images (#5775) 2023-12-21 21:59:01 -06:00
README.md build: relocate *net deployment logic to their own directories 2021-12-21 12:41:00 +05:30

This docker image is built and pushed from travis. It does not contain any default configs or any special startup scripts. This is to keep it simple and to not copy too much logic from the official/supported Docker Images found at https://hub.docker.com/r/dashpay/dashd/

The image is mostly used for devops purposes, e.g. for testnet/devnet deployments. Regular users should use the official images instead of this one.

NOTE: Please update the image description at https://hub.docker.com/r/dashpay/dashd-develop/ when changing the above text