dash/test/functional/mempool_resurrect.py
MarcoFalke 20e1f4a8ef
Merge #13669: Tests: Cleanup create_transaction implementations
44bbceeef1 [Tests] Cleanup feature_block.py, remove unnecessary PreviousSpendableOutput object (Conor Scott)
736f941424 [Tests] Cleanup extra instances of create_transaction (Conor Scott)
157651855f [Tests] Rename create_tx and move to blocktools.py (Conor Scott)

Pull request description:

  There currently exist seven ([1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_cltv.py#L52-L60), [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py#L88-L95) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_dersig.py#L40-L48), [4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py#L100-L108), [5](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L529-L535), [6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L120-L129), [7](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L1218-L1220)) implementations of a function called something similar to `create_transaction` in the functional tests, some of which are exact copies of each other.

  This PR aims to clean this up into [three different cases implemented in blocktools.py](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/create_tx_cleanup/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L121-L149)
  1. `create_tx_with_script`: Return transaction object spending generic tx output optionally specifying scriptSig and scriptPubKey
  2. `create_transaction`: Return transaction object spending coinbase tx
  2. `create_raw_transaction`: Return raw transaction (hex string) spending coinbase tx

  I am not committed to any of these function names, so I'll gladly take suggestions on there.

  Additionally there are some related cleanups to feature_block.py tests, specifically removing the [PreviousSpendableOutput](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L51-L54) object, which seems like an unnecessary layer given that every instance spends the 0 output.

Tree-SHA512: 63c6233b6f0942c81ba1ca67ea6770809b8c9409314c6d4cf8e5a3991cb9ee92b22bebe88c0dde45cd71e754eb351230c4c404b70ff118f5f43c034452ada65c
2021-07-06 20:29:31 +03:00

68 lines
2.8 KiB
Python
Executable File

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2014-2016 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
"""Test resurrection of mined transactions when the blockchain is re-organized."""
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.blocktools import create_raw_transaction
from test_framework.util import *
class MempoolCoinbaseTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.num_nodes = 1
def run_test(self):
node0_address = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
# Spend block 1/2/3's coinbase transactions
# Mine a block.
# Create three more transactions, spending the spends
# Mine another block.
# ... make sure all the transactions are confirmed
# Invalidate both blocks
# ... make sure all the transactions are put back in the mempool
# Mine a new block
# ... make sure all the transactions are confirmed again.
b = [ self.nodes[0].getblockhash(n) for n in range(1, 4) ]
coinbase_txids = [ self.nodes[0].getblock(h)['tx'][0] for h in b ]
spends1_raw = [ create_raw_transaction(self.nodes[0], txid, node0_address, 500) for txid in coinbase_txids ]
spends1_id = [ self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(tx, False, False, True) for tx in spends1_raw ]
blocks = []
blocks.extend(self.nodes[0].generate(1))
spends2_raw = [ create_raw_transaction(self.nodes[0], txid, node0_address, 499.99) for txid in spends1_id ]
spends2_id = [ self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(tx, False, False, True) for tx in spends2_raw ]
blocks.extend(self.nodes[0].generate(1))
# mempool should be empty, all txns confirmed
assert_equal(set(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), set())
for txid in spends1_id+spends2_id:
tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)
assert(tx["confirmations"] > 0)
# Use invalidateblock to re-org back
for node in self.nodes:
node.invalidateblock(blocks[0])
# All txns should be back in mempool with 0 confirmations
assert_equal(set(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), set(spends1_id+spends2_id))
for txid in spends1_id+spends2_id:
tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)
assert(tx["confirmations"] == 0)
# Generate another block, they should all get mined
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
# mempool should be empty, all txns confirmed
assert_equal(set(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), set())
for txid in spends1_id+spends2_id:
tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid)
assert(tx["confirmations"] > 0)
if __name__ == '__main__':
MempoolCoinbaseTest().main()