mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-27 04:52:59 +01:00
20e1f4a8ef
44bbceeef1 [Tests] Cleanup feature_block.py, remove unnecessary PreviousSpendableOutput object (Conor Scott) 736f941424 [Tests] Cleanup extra instances of create_transaction (Conor Scott) 157651855f [Tests] Rename create_tx and move to blocktools.py (Conor Scott) Pull request description: There currently exist seven ([1](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_cltv.py#L52-L60), [2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py#L88-L95) [3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_dersig.py#L40-L48), [4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_nulldummy.py#L100-L108), [5](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L529-L535), [6](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L120-L129), [7](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L1218-L1220)) implementations of a function called something similar to `create_transaction` in the functional tests, some of which are exact copies of each other. This PR aims to clean this up into [three different cases implemented in blocktools.py](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/create_tx_cleanup/test/functional/test_framework/blocktools.py#L121-L149) 1. `create_tx_with_script`: Return transaction object spending generic tx output optionally specifying scriptSig and scriptPubKey 2. `create_transaction`: Return transaction object spending coinbase tx 2. `create_raw_transaction`: Return raw transaction (hex string) spending coinbase tx I am not committed to any of these function names, so I'll gladly take suggestions on there. Additionally there are some related cleanups to feature_block.py tests, specifically removing the [PreviousSpendableOutput](https://github.com/conscott/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/feature_block.py#L51-L54) object, which seems like an unnecessary layer given that every instance spends the 0 output. Tree-SHA512: 63c6233b6f0942c81ba1ca67ea6770809b8c9409314c6d4cf8e5a3991cb9ee92b22bebe88c0dde45cd71e754eb351230c4c404b70ff118f5f43c034452ada65c |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| __init__.py | ||
| address.py | ||
| authproxy.py | ||
| bignum.py | ||
| blocktools.py | ||
| coverage.py | ||
| key.py | ||
| messages.py | ||
| mininode.py | ||
| netutil.py | ||
| script.py | ||
| siphash.py | ||
| socks5.py | ||
| test_framework.py | ||
| test_node.py | ||
| util.py | ||