mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-26 20:42:59 +01:00
62ec84d21a
fa6c62f34b50818102ad58f2ffd152189f54d973 test: Replace log with assert_equal in wallet_abandonconflict (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This will make the test fail as soon as the bug is fixed, forcing it to
be updated. Otherwise, the bug might be fixed (or made worse)
accidentally, leaving the test in an inconsistent state.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK fa6c62f34b50818102ad58f2ffd152189f54d973
brunoerg:
tACK fa6c62f34b50818102ad58f2ffd152189f54d973
Tree-SHA512: 416f72380164bf3f93332a5cfa81a8e61d8ada3714ef6815889ed3cf2d16c09411760dee4acf19629227e565b765b3dea491a0b23efd38eb370254cfadf7c441
226 lines
10 KiB
Python
Executable File
226 lines
10 KiB
Python
Executable File
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2014-2019 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
|
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
|
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
|
"""Test the abandontransaction RPC.
|
|
|
|
The abandontransaction RPC marks a transaction and all its in-wallet
|
|
descendants as abandoned which allows their inputs to be respent. It can be
|
|
used to replace "stuck" or evicted transactions. It only works on transactions
|
|
which are not included in a block and are not currently in the mempool. It has
|
|
no effect on transactions which are already abandoned.
|
|
"""
|
|
from decimal import Decimal
|
|
|
|
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
|
|
from test_framework.util import (
|
|
assert_equal,
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error,
|
|
connect_nodes,
|
|
disconnect_nodes,
|
|
wait_until,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|
def set_test_params(self):
|
|
self.num_nodes = 2
|
|
self.extra_args = [["-minrelaytxfee=0.00001"], []]
|
|
|
|
def skip_test_if_missing_module(self):
|
|
self.skip_if_no_wallet()
|
|
|
|
def run_test(self):
|
|
self.nodes[1].generate(100)
|
|
self.sync_blocks()
|
|
balance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
txA = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
|
|
txB = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
|
|
txC = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
|
|
self.sync_mempools()
|
|
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
# Can not abandon non-wallet transaction
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, 'Invalid or non-wallet transaction id', lambda: self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txid='ff' * 32))
|
|
# Can not abandon confirmed transaction
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, 'Transaction not eligible for abandonment', lambda: self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txid=txA))
|
|
|
|
self.sync_blocks()
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert balance - newbalance < Decimal("0.001") #no more than fees lost
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
# Disconnect nodes so node0's transactions don't get into node1's mempool
|
|
disconnect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
|
|
|
|
# Identify the 10btc outputs
|
|
nA = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txA)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("10"))
|
|
nB = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txB)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("10"))
|
|
nC = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txC)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("10"))
|
|
|
|
inputs = []
|
|
# spend 10btc outputs from txA and txB
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txA, "vout": nA})
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txB, "vout": nB})
|
|
outputs = {}
|
|
|
|
outputs[self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("14.99998")
|
|
outputs[self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("5")
|
|
signed = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
|
|
txAB1 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
|
|
|
|
# Identify the 14.99998btc output
|
|
nAB = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txAB1)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("14.99998"))
|
|
|
|
#Create a child tx spending AB1 and C
|
|
inputs = []
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txAB1, "vout": nAB})
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txC, "vout": nC})
|
|
outputs = {}
|
|
outputs[self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("24.9996")
|
|
signed2 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
|
|
txABC2 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed2["hex"])
|
|
|
|
# Create a child tx spending ABC2
|
|
signed3_change = Decimal("24.999")
|
|
inputs = [{"txid": txABC2, "vout": 0}]
|
|
outputs = {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): signed3_change}
|
|
signed3 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
|
|
# note tx is never directly referenced, only abandoned as a child of the above
|
|
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed3["hex"])
|
|
|
|
# In mempool txs from self should increase balance from change
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("30") + signed3_change)
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
# Restart the node with a higher min relay fee so the parent tx is no longer in mempool
|
|
# TODO: redo with eviction
|
|
self.stop_node(0)
|
|
self.start_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.0001"])
|
|
wait_until(lambda: self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['loaded'])
|
|
|
|
# Verify txs no longer in either node's mempool
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
|
|
# Not in mempool txs from self should only reduce balance
|
|
# inputs are still spent, but change not received
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - signed3_change)
|
|
# Unconfirmed received funds that are not in mempool, also shouldn't show
|
|
# up in unconfirmed balance
|
|
unconfbalance = self.nodes[0].getunconfirmedbalance() + self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(unconfbalance, newbalance)
|
|
# Also shouldn't show up in listunspent
|
|
assert not txABC2 in [utxo["txid"] for utxo in self.nodes[0].listunspent(0)]
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
# Abandon original transaction and verify inputs are available again
|
|
# including that the child tx was also abandoned
|
|
self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txAB1)
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("30"))
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
self.log.info("Check abandoned transactions in listsinceblock")
|
|
listsinceblock = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock()
|
|
txAB1_listsinceblock = [d for d in listsinceblock['transactions'] if d['txid'] == txAB1 and d['category'] == 'send']
|
|
for tx in txAB1_listsinceblock:
|
|
assert_equal(tx['abandoned'], True)
|
|
assert_equal(tx['confirmations'], 0)
|
|
assert_equal(tx['trusted'], False)
|
|
|
|
# Verify that even with a low min relay fee, the tx is not reaccepted from wallet on startup once abandoned
|
|
self.stop_node(0)
|
|
self.start_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.00001"])
|
|
wait_until(lambda: self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['loaded'])
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), balance)
|
|
|
|
# But if it is received again then it is unabandoned
|
|
# And since now in mempool, the change is available
|
|
# But its child tx remains abandoned
|
|
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("20") + Decimal("14.99998"))
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
# Send child tx again so it is unabandoned
|
|
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed2["hex"])
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("10") - Decimal("14.99998") + Decimal("24.9996"))
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
# Remove using high relay fee again
|
|
self.stop_node(0)
|
|
self.start_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.0001"])
|
|
wait_until(lambda: self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['loaded'])
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("24.9996"))
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
self.log.info("Test transactions conflicted by a double spend")
|
|
# Create a double spend of AB1 by spending again from only A's 10 output
|
|
# Mine double spend from node 1
|
|
inputs = []
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txA, "vout": nA})
|
|
outputs = {}
|
|
outputs[self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("9.9999")
|
|
tx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
|
|
signed = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(tx)
|
|
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
|
|
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
|
|
self.sync_blocks()
|
|
|
|
tx_list = self.nodes[0].listtransactions()
|
|
|
|
conflicted = [tx for tx in tx_list if tx["confirmations"] < 0]
|
|
assert_equal(4, len(conflicted))
|
|
|
|
wallet_conflicts = [tx for tx in conflicted if tx["walletconflicts"]]
|
|
assert_equal(2, len(wallet_conflicts))
|
|
|
|
double_spends = [tx for tx in tx_list if tx["walletconflicts"] and tx["confirmations"] > 0]
|
|
assert_equal(1, len(double_spends))
|
|
double_spend = double_spends[0]
|
|
|
|
# Test the properties of the conflicted transactions, i.e. with confirmations < 0.
|
|
for tx in conflicted:
|
|
assert_equal(tx["abandoned"], False)
|
|
assert_equal(tx["confirmations"], -1)
|
|
assert_equal(tx["trusted"], False)
|
|
|
|
# Test the properties of the double-spend transaction, i.e. having wallet conflicts and confirmations > 0.
|
|
assert_equal(double_spend["abandoned"], False)
|
|
assert_equal(double_spend["confirmations"], 1)
|
|
assert "trusted" not in double_spend.keys() # "trusted" only returned if tx has 0 or negative confirmations.
|
|
|
|
# Test the walletconflicts field of each.
|
|
for tx in wallet_conflicts:
|
|
assert_equal(double_spend["walletconflicts"], [tx["txid"]])
|
|
assert_equal(tx["walletconflicts"], [double_spend["txid"]])
|
|
|
|
# Verify that B and C's 10 BTC outputs are available for spending again because AB1 is now conflicted
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("20"))
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
# There is currently a minor bug around this and so this test doesn't work. See Issue #7315
|
|
# Invalidate the block with the double spend and B's 10 BTC output should no longer be available
|
|
# Don't think C's should either
|
|
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
#assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("10"))
|
|
self.log.info("If balance has not declined after invalidateblock then out of mempool wallet tx which is no longer")
|
|
self.log.info("conflicted has not resumed causing its inputs to be seen as spent. See Issue #7315")
|
|
assert_equal(balance, newbalance)
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
AbandonConflictTest().main()
|