dash/test/functional/wallet_abandonconflict.py
PastaPastaPasta b07a7b810c
Backport 11796 + 11774 (#3612)
* Merge #11796: [tests] Functional test naming convention

5fecd84 [tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns)
9b20bb4 [tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns)
7250b4e [tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns)
82b2712 [tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery)
1e10854 [tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes.

Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80

* update violation count

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

* Merge #11774: [tests] Rename functional tests

6f881cc880 [tests] Remove EXPECTED_VIOLATION_COUNT (Anthony Towns)
3150b3fea7 [tests] Rename misc functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
81b79f2c39 [tests] Rename rpc_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
61b8f7f273 [tests] Rename p2p_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
90600bc7db [tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
ca6523d0c8 [tests] Rename feature_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  This PR changes the functional tests to have a consistent naming scheme:

      tests for individual RPC methods are named rpc_...
      tests for interfaces (REST, ZMQ, RPC features) are named interface_...
      tests that explicitly test the p2p interface are named p2p_...
      tests for wallet features are named wallet_...
      tests for mining features are named mining_...
      tests for mempool behaviour are named mempool_...
      tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool are named feature_...

  Rationale: it's sometimes difficult for new contributors to know what's already covered by existing tests and where new tests should be added. Naming in a consistent fashion makes it easier to see what's already covered at a glance.

Tree-SHA512: 4246790552d42bbd95f6d5bdf67702b81b3b2c583ce7eaf1fe6d8e254721279b47315973c6e9ae82dad6e4c747f12188160764bf2624c0f8f3b4d39330ec8b16

* rename tests and edit associated strings to align test-suite with test name standards

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

* fix grammar in test/functional/test_runner.py

Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>

* ci: Fix excluded test names

* rename feature_privatesend.py to rpc_privatesend.py

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
2020-07-17 02:44:20 +03:00

173 lines
8.3 KiB
Python
Executable File

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2014-2016 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
"""Test the abandontransaction RPC.
The abandontransaction RPC marks a transaction and all its in-wallet
descendants as abandoned which allows their inputs to be respent. It can be
used to replace "stuck" or evicted transactions. It only works on transactions
which are not included in a block and are not currently in the mempool. It has
no effect on transactions which are already abandoned.
"""
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import *
class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.num_nodes = 2
self.extra_args = [["-minrelaytxfee=0.00001"], []]
def run_test(self):
self.nodes[1].generate(100)
self.sync_blocks()
balance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
txA = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
txB = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
txC = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
self.sync_mempools()
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
# Can not abandon non-wallet transaction
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, 'Invalid or non-wallet transaction id', lambda: self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txid='ff' * 32))
# Can not abandon confirmed transaction
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, 'Transaction not eligible for abandonment', lambda: self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txid=txA))
self.sync_blocks()
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert(balance - newbalance < Decimal("0.001")) #no more than fees lost
balance = newbalance
# Disconnect nodes so node0's transactions don't get into node1's mempool
disconnect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
# Identify the 10btc outputs
nA = next(i for i, vout in enumerate(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txA, 1)["vout"]) if vout["value"] == Decimal("10"))
nB = next(i for i, vout in enumerate(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txB, 1)["vout"]) if vout["value"] == Decimal("10"))
nC = next(i for i, vout in enumerate(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txC, 1)["vout"]) if vout["value"] == Decimal("10"))
inputs =[]
# spend 10btc outputs from txA and txB
inputs.append({"txid":txA, "vout":nA})
inputs.append({"txid":txB, "vout":nB})
outputs = {}
outputs[self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("14.99998")
outputs[self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("5")
signed = self.nodes[0].signrawtransaction(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
txAB1 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
# Identify the 14.99998btc output
nAB = next(i for i, vout in enumerate(self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txAB1, 1)["vout"]) if vout["value"] == Decimal("14.99998"))
#Create a child tx spending AB1 and C
inputs = []
inputs.append({"txid":txAB1, "vout":nAB})
inputs.append({"txid":txC, "vout":nC})
outputs = {}
outputs[self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("24.9996")
signed2 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransaction(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
txABC2 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed2["hex"])
# Create a child tx spending ABC2
signed3_change = Decimal("24.999")
inputs = [ {"txid":txABC2, "vout":0} ]
outputs = { self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): signed3_change }
signed3 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransaction(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
# note tx is never directly referenced, only abandoned as a child of the above
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed3["hex"])
# In mempool txs from self should increase balance from change
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("30") + signed3_change)
balance = newbalance
# Restart the node with a higher min relay fee so the parent tx is no longer in mempool
# TODO: redo with eviction
self.stop_node(0)
self.start_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.0001"])
# Verify txs no longer in either node's mempool
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].getrawmempool()), 0)
# Not in mempool txs from self should only reduce balance
# inputs are still spent, but change not received
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - signed3_change)
# Unconfirmed received funds that are not in mempool, also shouldn't show
# up in unconfirmed balance
unconfbalance = self.nodes[0].getunconfirmedbalance() + self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(unconfbalance, newbalance)
# Also shouldn't show up in listunspent
assert(not txABC2 in [utxo["txid"] for utxo in self.nodes[0].listunspent(0)])
balance = newbalance
# Abandon original transaction and verify inputs are available again
# including that the child tx was also abandoned
self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txAB1)
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("30"))
balance = newbalance
# Verify that even with a low min relay fee, the tx is not reaccepted from wallet on startup once abandoned
self.stop_node(0)
self.start_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.00001"])
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), balance)
# But if it is received again then it is unabandoned
# And since now in mempool, the change is available
# But its child tx remains abandoned
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("20") + Decimal("14.99998"))
balance = newbalance
# Send child tx again so it is unabandoned
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed2["hex"])
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("10") - Decimal("14.99998") + Decimal("24.9996"))
balance = newbalance
# Remove using high relay fee again
self.stop_node(0)
self.start_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.0001"])
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("24.9996"))
balance = newbalance
# Create a double spend of AB1 by spending again from only A's 10 output
# Mine double spend from node 1
inputs =[]
inputs.append({"txid":txA, "vout":nA})
outputs = {}
outputs[self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("9.9999")
tx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
signed = self.nodes[0].signrawtransaction(tx)
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
self.sync_blocks()
# Verify that B and C's 10 BTC outputs are available for spending again because AB1 is now conflicted
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("20"))
balance = newbalance
# There is currently a minor bug around this and so this test doesn't work. See Issue #7315
# Invalidate the block with the double spend and B's 10 BTC output should no longer be available
# Don't think C's should either
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
#assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("10"))
self.log.info("If balance has not declined after invalidateblock then out of mempool wallet tx which is no longer")
self.log.info("conflicted has not resumed causing its inputs to be seen as spent. See Issue #7315")
self.log.info(str(balance) + " -> " + str(newbalance) + " ?")
if __name__ == '__main__':
AbandonConflictTest().main()