mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-26 20:42:59 +01:00
b07a7b810c
* Merge #11796: [tests] Functional test naming convention5fecd84
[tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns)9b20bb4
[tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns)7250b4e
[tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns)82b2712
[tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery)1e10854
[tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery) Pull request description: Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes. Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80 * update violation count Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Merge #11774: [tests] Rename functional tests6f881cc880
[tests] Remove EXPECTED_VIOLATION_COUNT (Anthony Towns)3150b3fea7
[tests] Rename misc functional tests. (Anthony Towns)81b79f2c39
[tests] Rename rpc_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)61b8f7f273
[tests] Rename p2p_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)90600bc7db
[tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)ca6523d0c8
[tests] Rename feature_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns) Pull request description: This PR changes the functional tests to have a consistent naming scheme: tests for individual RPC methods are named rpc_... tests for interfaces (REST, ZMQ, RPC features) are named interface_... tests that explicitly test the p2p interface are named p2p_... tests for wallet features are named wallet_... tests for mining features are named mining_... tests for mempool behaviour are named mempool_... tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool are named feature_... Rationale: it's sometimes difficult for new contributors to know what's already covered by existing tests and where new tests should be added. Naming in a consistent fashion makes it easier to see what's already covered at a glance. Tree-SHA512: 4246790552d42bbd95f6d5bdf67702b81b3b2c583ce7eaf1fe6d8e254721279b47315973c6e9ae82dad6e4c747f12188160764bf2624c0f8f3b4d39330ec8b16 * rename tests and edit associated strings to align test-suite with test name standards Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * fix grammar in test/functional/test_runner.py Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com> * ci: Fix excluded test names * rename feature_privatesend.py to rpc_privatesend.py Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
159 lines
6.5 KiB
Python
Executable File
159 lines
6.5 KiB
Python
Executable File
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2015-2016 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
|
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
|
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
|
"""Test BIP65 (CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY).
|
|
|
|
Test that the CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY soft-fork activates at (regtest) block height
|
|
1351.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
|
|
from test_framework.util import *
|
|
from test_framework.mininode import *
|
|
from test_framework.blocktools import create_coinbase, create_block
|
|
from test_framework.script import CScript, OP_1NEGATE, OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, OP_DROP, CScriptNum
|
|
from io import BytesIO
|
|
|
|
CLTV_HEIGHT = 1351
|
|
|
|
# Reject codes that we might receive in this test
|
|
REJECT_INVALID = 16
|
|
REJECT_OBSOLETE = 17
|
|
REJECT_NONSTANDARD = 64
|
|
|
|
def cltv_invalidate(tx):
|
|
'''Modify the signature in vin 0 of the tx to fail CLTV
|
|
|
|
Prepends -1 CLTV DROP in the scriptSig itself.
|
|
|
|
TODO: test more ways that transactions using CLTV could be invalid (eg
|
|
locktime requirements fail, sequence time requirements fail, etc).
|
|
'''
|
|
tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript([OP_1NEGATE, OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, OP_DROP] +
|
|
list(CScript(tx.vin[0].scriptSig)))
|
|
|
|
def cltv_validate(node, tx, height):
|
|
'''Modify the signature in vin 0 of the tx to pass CLTV
|
|
Prepends <height> CLTV DROP in the scriptSig, and sets
|
|
the locktime to height'''
|
|
tx.vin[0].nSequence = 0
|
|
tx.nLockTime = height
|
|
|
|
# Need to re-sign, since nSequence and nLockTime changed
|
|
signed_result = node.signrawtransaction(ToHex(tx))
|
|
new_tx = CTransaction()
|
|
new_tx.deserialize(BytesIO(hex_str_to_bytes(signed_result['hex'])))
|
|
|
|
new_tx.vin[0].scriptSig = CScript([CScriptNum(height), OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY, OP_DROP] +
|
|
list(CScript(new_tx.vin[0].scriptSig)))
|
|
return new_tx
|
|
|
|
def create_transaction(node, coinbase, to_address, amount):
|
|
from_txid = node.getblock(coinbase)['tx'][0]
|
|
inputs = [{ "txid" : from_txid, "vout" : 0}]
|
|
outputs = { to_address : amount }
|
|
rawtx = node.createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
|
|
signresult = node.signrawtransaction(rawtx)
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
tx.deserialize(BytesIO(hex_str_to_bytes(signresult['hex'])))
|
|
return tx
|
|
|
|
class BIP65Test(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|
def set_test_params(self):
|
|
self.num_nodes = 1
|
|
self.extra_args = [['-whitelist=127.0.0.1', '-dip3params=9000:9000']]
|
|
self.setup_clean_chain = True
|
|
|
|
def run_test(self):
|
|
self.nodes[0].add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
|
|
|
|
network_thread_start()
|
|
|
|
# wait_for_verack ensures that the P2P connection is fully up.
|
|
self.nodes[0].p2p.wait_for_verack()
|
|
|
|
self.log.info("Mining %d blocks", CLTV_HEIGHT - 2)
|
|
self.coinbase_blocks = self.nodes[0].generate(CLTV_HEIGHT - 2)
|
|
self.nodeaddress = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
|
|
|
|
self.log.info("Test that an invalid-according-to-CLTV transaction can still appear in a block")
|
|
|
|
spendtx = create_transaction(self.nodes[0], self.coinbase_blocks[0],
|
|
self.nodeaddress, 1.0)
|
|
cltv_invalidate(spendtx)
|
|
spendtx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
tip = self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash()
|
|
block_time = self.nodes[0].getblockheader(tip)['mediantime'] + 1
|
|
block = create_block(int(tip, 16), create_coinbase(CLTV_HEIGHT - 1), block_time)
|
|
block.nVersion = 3
|
|
block.vtx.append(spendtx)
|
|
block.hashMerkleRoot = block.calc_merkle_root()
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].p2p.send_and_ping(msg_block(block))
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash(), block.hash)
|
|
|
|
self.log.info("Test that blocks must now be at least version 4")
|
|
tip = block.sha256
|
|
block_time += 1
|
|
block = create_block(tip, create_coinbase(CLTV_HEIGHT), block_time)
|
|
block.nVersion = 3
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
self.nodes[0].p2p.send_and_ping(msg_block(block))
|
|
assert_equal(int(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash(), 16), tip)
|
|
|
|
wait_until(lambda: "reject" in self.nodes[0].p2p.last_message.keys(), lock=mininode_lock)
|
|
with mininode_lock:
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].p2p.last_message["reject"].code, REJECT_OBSOLETE)
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].p2p.last_message["reject"].reason, b'bad-version(0x00000003)')
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].p2p.last_message["reject"].data, block.sha256)
|
|
del self.nodes[0].p2p.last_message["reject"]
|
|
|
|
self.log.info("Test that invalid-according-to-cltv transactions cannot appear in a block")
|
|
block.nVersion = 4
|
|
|
|
spendtx = create_transaction(self.nodes[0], self.coinbase_blocks[1],
|
|
self.nodeaddress, 1.0)
|
|
cltv_invalidate(spendtx)
|
|
spendtx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
# First we show that this tx is valid except for CLTV by getting it
|
|
# rejected from the mempool for exactly that reason.
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error(-26, 'non-mandatory-script-verify-flag (Negative locktime) (code 64)', self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction, bytes_to_hex_str(spendtx.serialize()), True)
|
|
|
|
# Now we verify that a block with this transaction is also invalid.
|
|
block.vtx.append(spendtx)
|
|
block.hashMerkleRoot = block.calc_merkle_root()
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].p2p.send_and_ping(msg_block(block))
|
|
assert_equal(int(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash(), 16), tip)
|
|
|
|
wait_until(lambda: "reject" in self.nodes[0].p2p.last_message.keys(), lock=mininode_lock)
|
|
with mininode_lock:
|
|
assert self.nodes[0].p2p.last_message["reject"].code in [REJECT_INVALID, REJECT_NONSTANDARD]
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].p2p.last_message["reject"].data, block.sha256)
|
|
if self.nodes[0].p2p.last_message["reject"].code == REJECT_INVALID:
|
|
# Generic rejection when a block is invalid
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].p2p.last_message["reject"].reason, b'block-validation-failed')
|
|
else:
|
|
assert b'Negative locktime' in self.nodes[0].p2p.last_message["reject"].reason
|
|
|
|
self.log.info("Test that a version 4 block with a valid-according-to-CLTV transaction is accepted")
|
|
spendtx = cltv_validate(self.nodes[0], spendtx, CLTV_HEIGHT - 1)
|
|
spendtx.rehash()
|
|
|
|
block.vtx.pop(1)
|
|
block.vtx.append(spendtx)
|
|
block.hashMerkleRoot = block.calc_merkle_root()
|
|
block.solve()
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].p2p.send_and_ping(msg_block(block))
|
|
assert_equal(int(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash(), 16), block.sha256)
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
BIP65Test().main()
|