PastaPastaPasta 770eefcd08 ci: upgrade cppcheck to 2.10; fix / suppress reported issues (#5328) ... ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented Upgraded version of cppcheck ## What was done? ## How Has This Been Tested? Ran cppcheck ## Breaking Changes None ## Checklist: _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._ - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_		2023-04-16 12:08:33 -05:00
..
bls_batchverifier.h	chore: run copyright_header.py update	2023-01-13 00:49:04 +03:00
bls_ies.cpp	chore: run copyright_header.py update	2023-01-13 00:49:04 +03:00
bls_ies.h	refactor: replace instances of typedef with using in dash code (#4488)	2021-10-06 00:26:29 +03:00
bls_worker.cpp	ci: upgrade cppcheck to 2.10; fix / suppress reported issues (#5328)	2023-04-16 12:08:33 -05:00
bls_worker.h	refactor: replace instances of typedef with using in dash code (#4488)	2021-10-06 00:26:29 +03:00
bls.cpp	fix: governance correct sig check (#5242)	2023-03-11 11:44:35 -06:00
bls.h	fix: governance correct sig check (#5242)	2023-03-11 11:44:35 -06:00