mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-29 05:49:11 +01:00
df6d458b85
* Remove orphan state wipe from UnloadBlockIndex.
As orphan state is now "network state", like in
d6ea737be1,
UnloadBlockIndex is only used during init if we end up reindexing
to clear our block state so that we can start over. However, at
that time no connections have been brought up as CConnman hasn't
been started yet, so all of the network processing state logic is
empty when its called.
* Move network-msg-processing code out of main to its own file
* Rename the remaining main.{h,cpp} to validation.{h,cpp}
87 lines
3.0 KiB
C++
87 lines
3.0 KiB
C++
// Copyright (c) 2011-2015 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
|
// Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
|
// file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
|
|
|
#include "consensus/validation.h"
|
|
#include "key.h"
|
|
#include "validation.h"
|
|
#include "miner.h"
|
|
#include "pubkey.h"
|
|
#include "txmempool.h"
|
|
#include "random.h"
|
|
#include "script/standard.h"
|
|
#include "test/test_dash.h"
|
|
#include "utiltime.h"
|
|
|
|
#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
|
|
|
|
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(tx_validationcache_tests)
|
|
|
|
static bool
|
|
ToMemPool(CMutableTransaction& tx)
|
|
{
|
|
LOCK(cs_main);
|
|
|
|
CValidationState state;
|
|
return AcceptToMemoryPool(mempool, state, tx, false, NULL, true, false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(tx_mempool_block_doublespend, TestChain100Setup)
|
|
{
|
|
// Make sure skipping validation of transctions that were
|
|
// validated going into the memory pool does not allow
|
|
// double-spends in blocks to pass validation when they should not.
|
|
|
|
CScript scriptPubKey = CScript() << ToByteVector(coinbaseKey.GetPubKey()) << OP_CHECKSIG;
|
|
|
|
// Create a double-spend of mature coinbase txn:
|
|
std::vector<CMutableTransaction> spends;
|
|
spends.resize(2);
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
|
|
{
|
|
spends[i].vin.resize(1);
|
|
spends[i].vin[0].prevout.hash = coinbaseTxns[0].GetHash();
|
|
spends[i].vin[0].prevout.n = 0;
|
|
spends[i].vout.resize(1);
|
|
spends[i].vout[0].nValue = 11*CENT;
|
|
spends[i].vout[0].scriptPubKey = scriptPubKey;
|
|
|
|
// Sign:
|
|
std::vector<unsigned char> vchSig;
|
|
uint256 hash = SignatureHash(scriptPubKey, spends[i], 0, SIGHASH_ALL);
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(coinbaseKey.Sign(hash, vchSig));
|
|
vchSig.push_back((unsigned char)SIGHASH_ALL);
|
|
spends[i].vin[0].scriptSig << vchSig;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
CBlock block;
|
|
|
|
// Test 1: block with both of those transactions should be rejected.
|
|
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey);
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
|
|
|
|
// Test 2: ... and should be rejected if spend1 is in the memory pool
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(ToMemPool(spends[0]));
|
|
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey);
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
|
|
mempool.clear();
|
|
|
|
// Test 3: ... and should be rejected if spend2 is in the memory pool
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(ToMemPool(spends[1]));
|
|
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(spends, scriptPubKey);
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockHash() != block.GetHash());
|
|
mempool.clear();
|
|
|
|
// Final sanity test: first spend in mempool, second in block, that's OK:
|
|
std::vector<CMutableTransaction> oneSpend;
|
|
oneSpend.push_back(spends[0]);
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(ToMemPool(spends[1]));
|
|
block = CreateAndProcessBlock(oneSpend, scriptPubKey);
|
|
BOOST_CHECK(chainActive.Tip()->GetBlockHash() == block.GetHash());
|
|
// spends[1] should have been removed from the mempool when the
|
|
// block with spends[0] is accepted:
|
|
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(mempool.size(), 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
|