dash/test/functional/rpc_mnauth.py
Konstantin Akimov f34889dcf4
Merge #19760: test: Remove confusing mininode terminology
d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a [test] Remove final references to mininode (John Newbery)
5e8df3312e47a73e747ee892face55ed9ababeea test: resort imports (John Newbery)
85165d4332b0f72d30e0c584b476249b542338e6 scripted-diff: Rename mininode to p2p (John Newbery)
9e2897d020b114a10c860f90c5405be029afddba scripted-diff: Rename mininode_lock to p2p_lock (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  New contributors are often confused by the terminology in the test framework, and what the difference between a _node_ and a _peer_ is. To summarize:

  - a 'node' is a bitcoind instance. This is the thing whose behavior is being tested. Each bitcoind node is managed by a python `TestNode` object which is used to start/stop the node, manage the node's data directory, read state about the node (eg process status, log file), and interact with the node over different interfaces.
  - one of the interfaces that we can use to interact with the node is the p2p interface. Each connection to a node using this interface is managed by a python `P2PInterface` or derived object (which is owned by the `TestNode` object). We can open zero, one or many p2p connections to each bitcoind node. The node sees these connections as 'peers'.

  For historic reasons, the word 'mininode' has been used to refer to those p2p interface objects that we use to connect to the bitcoind node (the code was originally taken from the 'mini-node' branch of https://github.com/jgarzik/pynode/tree/mini-node). However that name has proved to be confusing for new contributors, so rename the remaining references.

ACKs for top commit:
  amitiuttarwar:
    ACK d5800da519
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK d5800da5199527a366024bc80cad7fcca17d5c4a 🚞
Tree-SHA512: 2c46c2ac3c4278b6e3c647cfd8108428a41e80788fc4f0e386e5b0c47675bc687d94779496c09a3e5ea1319617295be10c422adeeff2d2bd68378e00e0eeb5de
2024-01-20 00:07:10 +07:00

58 lines
2.5 KiB
Python
Executable File

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2021-2022 The Dash Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
from test_framework.messages import hash256
from test_framework.p2p import P2PInterface
from test_framework.test_framework import DashTestFramework
from test_framework.util import assert_equal, assert_raises_rpc_error, hex_str_to_bytes
'''
rpc_mnauth.py
Tests mnauth RPC command
'''
class FakeMNAUTHTest(DashTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.set_dash_test_params(2, 1, fast_dip3_enforcement=True)
def run_test(self):
masternode = self.mninfo[0]
masternode.node.add_p2p_connection(P2PInterface())
protx_hash = masternode.proTxHash
#TODO: Fix that with basic BLS
public_key = masternode.pubKeyOperator
# The peerinfo should not yet contain verified_proregtx_hash/verified_pubkey_hash
assert "verified_proregtx_hash" not in masternode.node.getpeerinfo()[-1]
assert "verified_pubkey_hash" not in masternode.node.getpeerinfo()[-1]
# Fake-Authenticate the P2P connection to the masternode
node_id = masternode.node.getpeerinfo()[-1]["id"]
assert masternode.node.mnauth(node_id, protx_hash, public_key)
# The peerinfo should now contain verified_proregtx_hash and verified_pubkey_hash
peerinfo = masternode.node.getpeerinfo()[-1]
assert "verified_proregtx_hash" in peerinfo
assert "verified_pubkey_hash" in peerinfo
assert_equal(peerinfo["verified_proregtx_hash"], protx_hash)
assert_equal(peerinfo["verified_pubkey_hash"], hash256(hex_str_to_bytes(public_key))[::-1].hex())
# Test some error cases
null_hash = "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "proTxHash invalid", masternode.node.mnauth,
node_id,
null_hash,
public_key)
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "publicKey invalid", masternode.node.mnauth,
node_id,
protx_hash,
null_hash)
assert not masternode.node.mnauth(-1, protx_hash, public_key)
if __name__ == '__main__':
FakeMNAUTHTest().main()