dash/test/functional/wallet_txn_clone.py
PastaPastaPasta b07a7b810c
Backport 11796 + 11774 (#3612)
* Merge #11796: [tests] Functional test naming convention

5fecd84 [tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns)
9b20bb4 [tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns)
7250b4e [tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns)
82b2712 [tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery)
1e10854 [tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes.

Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80

* update violation count

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

* Merge #11774: [tests] Rename functional tests

6f881cc880 [tests] Remove EXPECTED_VIOLATION_COUNT (Anthony Towns)
3150b3fea7 [tests] Rename misc functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
81b79f2c39 [tests] Rename rpc_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
61b8f7f273 [tests] Rename p2p_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
90600bc7db [tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
ca6523d0c8 [tests] Rename feature_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  This PR changes the functional tests to have a consistent naming scheme:

      tests for individual RPC methods are named rpc_...
      tests for interfaces (REST, ZMQ, RPC features) are named interface_...
      tests that explicitly test the p2p interface are named p2p_...
      tests for wallet features are named wallet_...
      tests for mining features are named mining_...
      tests for mempool behaviour are named mempool_...
      tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool are named feature_...

  Rationale: it's sometimes difficult for new contributors to know what's already covered by existing tests and where new tests should be added. Naming in a consistent fashion makes it easier to see what's already covered at a glance.

Tree-SHA512: 4246790552d42bbd95f6d5bdf67702b81b3b2c583ce7eaf1fe6d8e254721279b47315973c6e9ae82dad6e4c747f12188160764bf2624c0f8f3b4d39330ec8b16

* rename tests and edit associated strings to align test-suite with test name standards

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

* fix grammar in test/functional/test_runner.py

Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>

* ci: Fix excluded test names

* rename feature_privatesend.py to rpc_privatesend.py

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
2020-07-17 02:44:20 +03:00

156 lines
7.4 KiB
Python
Executable File

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2014-2016 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
"""Test the wallet accounts properly when there are cloned transactions with malleated scriptsigs."""
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import *
class TxnMallTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.num_nodes = 4
def add_options(self, parser):
parser.add_option("--mineblock", dest="mine_block", default=False, action="store_true",
help="Test double-spend of 1-confirmed transaction")
def setup_network(self):
# Start with split network:
super(TxnMallTest, self).setup_network()
disconnect_nodes(self.nodes[1], 2)
disconnect_nodes(self.nodes[2], 1)
def run_test(self):
# All nodes should start with 12,500 DASH:
starting_balance = 12500
for i in range(4):
assert_equal(self.nodes[i].getbalance(), starting_balance)
self.nodes[i].getnewaddress("") # bug workaround, coins generated assigned to first getnewaddress!
# Assign coins to foo and bar accounts:
self.nodes[0].settxfee(.001)
node0_address_foo = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress("foo")
fund_foo_txid = self.nodes[0].sendfrom("", node0_address_foo, 12190)
fund_foo_tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(fund_foo_txid)
node0_address_bar = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress("bar")
fund_bar_txid = self.nodes[0].sendfrom("", node0_address_bar, 290)
fund_bar_tx = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(fund_bar_txid)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(""),
starting_balance - 12190 - 290 + fund_foo_tx["fee"] + fund_bar_tx["fee"])
# Coins are sent to node1_address
node1_address = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress("from0")
# Send tx1, and another transaction tx2 that won't be cloned
txid1 = self.nodes[0].sendfrom("foo", node1_address, 400, 0)
txid2 = self.nodes[0].sendfrom("bar", node1_address, 200, 0)
# Construct a clone of tx1, to be malleated
rawtx1 = self.nodes[0].getrawtransaction(txid1,1)
clone_inputs = [{"txid":rawtx1["vin"][0]["txid"],"vout":rawtx1["vin"][0]["vout"]}]
clone_outputs = {rawtx1["vout"][0]["scriptPubKey"]["addresses"][0]:rawtx1["vout"][0]["value"],
rawtx1["vout"][1]["scriptPubKey"]["addresses"][0]:rawtx1["vout"][1]["value"]}
clone_locktime = rawtx1["locktime"]
clone_raw = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(clone_inputs, clone_outputs, clone_locktime)
# createrawtransaction randomizes the order of its outputs, so swap them if necessary.
# output 0 is at version+#inputs+input+sigstub+sequence+#outputs
# 400 DASH serialized is 00902f5009000000
pos0 = 2*(4+1+36+1+4+1)
hex400 = "00902f5009000000"
output_len = 16 + 2 + 2 * int("0x" + clone_raw[pos0 + 16 : pos0 + 16 + 2], 0)
if (rawtx1["vout"][0]["value"] == 400 and clone_raw[pos0 : pos0 + 16] != hex400 or
rawtx1["vout"][0]["value"] != 400 and clone_raw[pos0 : pos0 + 16] == hex400):
output0 = clone_raw[pos0 : pos0 + output_len]
output1 = clone_raw[pos0 + output_len : pos0 + 2 * output_len]
clone_raw = clone_raw[:pos0] + output1 + output0 + clone_raw[pos0 + 2 * output_len:]
# Use a different signature hash type to sign. This creates an equivalent but malleated clone.
# Don't send the clone anywhere yet
tx1_clone = self.nodes[0].signrawtransaction(clone_raw, None, None, "ALL|ANYONECANPAY")
assert_equal(tx1_clone["complete"], True)
# Have node0 mine a block, if requested:
if (self.options.mine_block):
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
self.sync_blocks(self.nodes[0:2])
tx1 = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid1)
tx2 = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid2)
# Node0's balance should be starting balance, plus 500DASH for another
# matured block, minus tx1 and tx2 amounts, and minus transaction fees:
expected = starting_balance + fund_foo_tx["fee"] + fund_bar_tx["fee"]
if self.options.mine_block: expected += 500
expected += tx1["amount"] + tx1["fee"]
expected += tx2["amount"] + tx2["fee"]
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), expected)
# foo and bar accounts should be debited:
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance("foo", 0), 12190 + tx1["amount"] + tx1["fee"])
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance("bar", 0), 290 + tx2["amount"] + tx2["fee"])
if self.options.mine_block:
assert_equal(tx1["confirmations"], 1)
assert_equal(tx2["confirmations"], 1)
# Node1's "from0" balance should be both transaction amounts:
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance("from0"), -(tx1["amount"] + tx2["amount"]))
else:
assert_equal(tx1["confirmations"], 0)
assert_equal(tx2["confirmations"], 0)
# Send clone and its parent to miner
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(fund_foo_tx["hex"])
txid1_clone = self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(tx1_clone["hex"])
# ... mine a block...
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
# Reconnect the split network, and sync chain:
connect_nodes(self.nodes[1], 2)
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(fund_bar_tx["hex"])
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(tx2["hex"])
self.nodes[2].generate(1) # Mine another block to make sure we sync
self.sync_blocks()
# Re-fetch transaction info:
tx1 = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid1)
tx1_clone = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid1_clone)
tx2 = self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txid2)
# Verify expected confirmations
assert_equal(tx1["confirmations"], -2)
assert_equal(tx1_clone["confirmations"], 2)
assert_equal(tx2["confirmations"], 1)
# Check node0's total balance; should be same as before the clone, + 1000 DASH for 2 matured,
# less possible orphaned matured subsidy
expected += 1000
if (self.options.mine_block):
expected -= 500
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), expected)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance("*", 0), expected)
# Check node0's individual account balances.
# "foo" should have been debited by the equivalent clone of tx1
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance("foo"), 12190 + tx1["amount"] + tx1["fee"])
# "bar" should have been debited by (possibly unconfirmed) tx2
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance("bar", 0), 290 + tx2["amount"] + tx2["fee"])
# "" should have starting balance, less funding txes, plus subsidies
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance("", 0), starting_balance
- 12190
+ fund_foo_tx["fee"]
- 290
+ fund_bar_tx["fee"]
+ 1000)
# Node1's "from0" account balance
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance("from0", 0), -(tx1["amount"] + tx2["amount"]))
if __name__ == '__main__':
TxnMallTest().main()