dash/test/functional/rpc_net.py
PastaPastaPasta b07a7b810c
Backport 11796 + 11774 (#3612)
* Merge #11796: [tests] Functional test naming convention

5fecd84 [tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns)
9b20bb4 [tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns)
7250b4e [tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns)
82b2712 [tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery)
1e10854 [tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes.

Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80

* update violation count

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

* Merge #11774: [tests] Rename functional tests

6f881cc880 [tests] Remove EXPECTED_VIOLATION_COUNT (Anthony Towns)
3150b3fea7 [tests] Rename misc functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
81b79f2c39 [tests] Rename rpc_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
61b8f7f273 [tests] Rename p2p_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
90600bc7db [tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)
ca6523d0c8 [tests] Rename feature_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)

Pull request description:

  This PR changes the functional tests to have a consistent naming scheme:

      tests for individual RPC methods are named rpc_...
      tests for interfaces (REST, ZMQ, RPC features) are named interface_...
      tests that explicitly test the p2p interface are named p2p_...
      tests for wallet features are named wallet_...
      tests for mining features are named mining_...
      tests for mempool behaviour are named mempool_...
      tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool are named feature_...

  Rationale: it's sometimes difficult for new contributors to know what's already covered by existing tests and where new tests should be added. Naming in a consistent fashion makes it easier to see what's already covered at a glance.

Tree-SHA512: 4246790552d42bbd95f6d5bdf67702b81b3b2c583ce7eaf1fe6d8e254721279b47315973c6e9ae82dad6e4c747f12188160764bf2624c0f8f3b4d39330ec8b16

* rename tests and edit associated strings to align test-suite with test name standards

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

* fix grammar in test/functional/test_runner.py

Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>

* ci: Fix excluded test names

* rename feature_privatesend.py to rpc_privatesend.py

Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>

Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
2020-07-17 02:44:20 +03:00

107 lines
5.0 KiB
Python
Executable File

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2017 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
"""Test RPC calls related to net.
Tests correspond to code in rpc/net.cpp.
"""
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import (
assert_equal,
assert_greater_than_or_equal,
assert_raises_rpc_error,
connect_nodes_bi,
p2p_port,
wait_until,
)
class NetTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.setup_clean_chain = True
self.num_nodes = 2
def run_test(self):
# Wait for one ping/pong to finish so that we can be sure that there is no chatter between nodes for some time
# Especially the exchange of messages like getheaders and friends causes test failures here
self.nodes[0].ping()
wait_until(lambda: all(['pingtime' in n for n in self.nodes[0].getpeerinfo()]))
self._test_connection_count()
self._test_getnettotals()
self._test_getnetworkinginfo()
self._test_getaddednodeinfo()
self._test_getpeerinfo()
def _test_connection_count(self):
# connect_nodes_bi connects each node to the other
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getconnectioncount(), 2)
def _test_getnettotals(self):
# getnettotals totalbytesrecv and totalbytessent should be
# consistent with getpeerinfo. Since the RPC calls are not atomic,
# and messages might have been recvd or sent between RPC calls, call
# getnettotals before and after and verify that the returned values
# from getpeerinfo are bounded by those values.
net_totals_before = self.nodes[0].getnettotals()
peer_info = self.nodes[0].getpeerinfo()
net_totals_after = self.nodes[0].getnettotals()
assert_equal(len(peer_info), 2)
peers_recv = sum([peer['bytesrecv'] for peer in peer_info])
peers_sent = sum([peer['bytessent'] for peer in peer_info])
assert_greater_than_or_equal(peers_recv, net_totals_before['totalbytesrecv'])
assert_greater_than_or_equal(net_totals_after['totalbytesrecv'], peers_recv)
assert_greater_than_or_equal(peers_sent, net_totals_before['totalbytessent'])
assert_greater_than_or_equal(net_totals_after['totalbytessent'], peers_sent)
# test getnettotals and getpeerinfo by doing a ping
# the bytes sent/received should change
# note ping and pong are 32 bytes each
self.nodes[0].ping()
wait_until(lambda: (self.nodes[0].getnettotals()['totalbytessent'] >= net_totals_after['totalbytessent'] + 32 * 2), timeout=1)
wait_until(lambda: (self.nodes[0].getnettotals()['totalbytesrecv'] >= net_totals_after['totalbytesrecv'] + 32 * 2), timeout=1)
peer_info_after_ping = self.nodes[0].getpeerinfo()
for before, after in zip(peer_info, peer_info_after_ping):
assert_greater_than_or_equal(after['bytesrecv_per_msg'].get('pong', 0), before['bytesrecv_per_msg'].get('pong', 0) + 32)
assert_greater_than_or_equal(after['bytessent_per_msg'].get('ping', 0), before['bytessent_per_msg'].get('ping', 0) + 32)
def _test_getnetworkinginfo(self):
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()['networkactive'], True)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()['connections'], 2)
self.nodes[0].setnetworkactive(False)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()['networkactive'], False)
# Wait a bit for all sockets to close
wait_until(lambda: self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()['connections'] == 0, timeout=3)
wait_until(lambda: self.nodes[1].getnetworkinfo()['connections'] == 0, timeout=3)
self.nodes[0].setnetworkactive(True)
connect_nodes_bi(self.nodes, 0, 1)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()['networkactive'], True)
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getnetworkinfo()['connections'], 2)
def _test_getaddednodeinfo(self):
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getaddednodeinfo(), [])
# add a node (node2) to node0
ip_port = "127.0.0.1:{}".format(p2p_port(2))
self.nodes[0].addnode(ip_port, 'add')
# check that the node has indeed been added
added_nodes = self.nodes[0].getaddednodeinfo(ip_port)
assert_equal(len(added_nodes), 1)
assert_equal(added_nodes[0]['addednode'], ip_port)
# check that a non-existent node returns an error
assert_raises_rpc_error(-24, "Node has not been added", self.nodes[0].getaddednodeinfo, '1.1.1.1')
def _test_getpeerinfo(self):
peer_info = [x.getpeerinfo() for x in self.nodes]
# check both sides of bidirectional connection between nodes
# the address bound to on one side will be the source address for the other node
assert_equal(peer_info[0][0]['addrbind'], peer_info[1][0]['addr'])
assert_equal(peer_info[1][0]['addrbind'], peer_info[0][0]['addr'])
if __name__ == '__main__':
NetTest().main()