mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-26 12:32:48 +01:00
c4234a5e78
0306d78cb49d1684cc96ba3512b582a1fdaf78cc Use getbalances in wallet_address_types tests (Jon Atack) 7eacdc5167c8db94df84e206db85817bc64e4921 Shift coverage from getunconfirmedbalance to getbalances in wallet_abandonconflict tests (Jon Atack) 3e6f7377f600e47e5e3d439fc5d6ccf3db210038 Improve getbalances coverage in wallet_balance tests (Jon Atack) Pull request description: <strike>This PR updates several tests and then removes the `getunconfirmedbalance` RPC which was deprecated in facfb4111d14a3b06c46690a2cca7ca91cea8a96 a year ago. Next steps: remove the deprecated `getwalletinfo` fields and the `getbalance` RPC in follow-ups, if there seems to be consensus on those removals.</strike> Update: `getunconfirmedbalance` RPC was deprecated in facfb4111d14a3b06c46690a2cca7ca91cea8a96 a year ago, but following the review comments below, this PR now only updates the test coverage to use `getbalances` while still leaving basic coverage for `getunconfirmedbalance` in wallet_balance.py. That said, I've seen 3 regular contributors confused in the past 10 days by "DEPRECATED" warnings in the code that are not following the deprecation policy in [JSON-RPC-interface.md#versioning](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/JSON-RPC-interface.md#versioning). ISTM these warnings should either be removed, or the calls deprecated (`-deprecatedrpc`), or the policy updated to describe these warnings as a pre-deprecation practice. ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK 0306d78cb Tree-SHA512: 692e43e9bed5afa97d905740666e365f0b64e559e1c75a6a398236d9e943894e3477947fc11324f420a6feaffa0c0c1532aa983c50090ca39d06551399e6ddd1
221 lines
10 KiB
Python
Executable File
221 lines
10 KiB
Python
Executable File
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2014-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
|
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
|
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
|
"""Test the abandontransaction RPC.
|
|
|
|
The abandontransaction RPC marks a transaction and all its in-wallet
|
|
descendants as abandoned which allows their inputs to be respent. It can be
|
|
used to replace "stuck" or evicted transactions. It only works on transactions
|
|
which are not included in a block and are not currently in the mempool. It has
|
|
no effect on transactions which are already abandoned.
|
|
"""
|
|
from decimal import Decimal
|
|
|
|
from test_framework.blocktools import COINBASE_MATURITY
|
|
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
|
|
from test_framework.util import (
|
|
assert_equal,
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class AbandonConflictTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|
def set_test_params(self):
|
|
self.num_nodes = 2
|
|
self.extra_args = [["-minrelaytxfee=0.00001"], []]
|
|
|
|
def skip_test_if_missing_module(self):
|
|
self.skip_if_no_wallet()
|
|
|
|
def run_test(self):
|
|
self.nodes[1].generate(COINBASE_MATURITY)
|
|
self.sync_blocks()
|
|
balance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
txA = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
|
|
txB = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
|
|
txC = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(), Decimal("10"))
|
|
self.sync_mempools()
|
|
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
# Can not abandon non-wallet transaction
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, 'Invalid or non-wallet transaction id', lambda: self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txid='ff' * 32))
|
|
# Can not abandon confirmed transaction
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, 'Transaction not eligible for abandonment', lambda: self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txid=txA))
|
|
|
|
self.sync_blocks()
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert balance - newbalance < Decimal("0.001") #no more than fees lost
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
# Disconnect nodes so node0's transactions don't get into node1's mempool
|
|
self.disconnect_nodes(0, 1)
|
|
|
|
# Identify the 10btc outputs
|
|
nA = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txA)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("10"))
|
|
nB = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txB)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("10"))
|
|
nC = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txC)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("10"))
|
|
|
|
inputs = []
|
|
# spend 10btc outputs from txA and txB
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txA, "vout": nA})
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txB, "vout": nB})
|
|
outputs = {}
|
|
|
|
outputs[self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("14.99998")
|
|
outputs[self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("5")
|
|
signed = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
|
|
txAB1 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
|
|
|
|
# Identify the 14.99998btc output
|
|
nAB = next(tx_out["vout"] for tx_out in self.nodes[0].gettransaction(txAB1)["details"] if tx_out["amount"] == Decimal("14.99998"))
|
|
|
|
#Create a child tx spending AB1 and C
|
|
inputs = []
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txAB1, "vout": nAB})
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txC, "vout": nC})
|
|
outputs = {}
|
|
outputs[self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("24.9996")
|
|
signed2 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
|
|
txABC2 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed2["hex"])
|
|
|
|
# Create a child tx spending ABC2
|
|
signed3_change = Decimal("24.999")
|
|
inputs = [{"txid": txABC2, "vout": 0}]
|
|
outputs = {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): signed3_change}
|
|
signed3 = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs))
|
|
# note tx is never directly referenced, only abandoned as a child of the above
|
|
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed3["hex"])
|
|
|
|
# In mempool txs from self should increase balance from change
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("30") + signed3_change)
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
# Restart the node with a higher min relay fee so the parent tx is no longer in mempool
|
|
# TODO: redo with eviction
|
|
self.restart_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.0001"])
|
|
assert self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['loaded']
|
|
|
|
# Verify txs no longer in either node's mempool
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[1].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
|
|
# Not in mempool txs from self should only reduce balance
|
|
# inputs are still spent, but change not received
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - signed3_change)
|
|
# Unconfirmed received funds that are not in mempool, also shouldn't show
|
|
# up in unconfirmed balance
|
|
balances = self.nodes[0].getbalances()['mine']
|
|
assert_equal(balances['untrusted_pending'] + balances['trusted'], newbalance)
|
|
# Also shouldn't show up in listunspent
|
|
assert not txABC2 in [utxo["txid"] for utxo in self.nodes[0].listunspent(0)]
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
# Abandon original transaction and verify inputs are available again
|
|
# including that the child tx was also abandoned
|
|
self.nodes[0].abandontransaction(txAB1)
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("30"))
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
self.log.info("Check abandoned transactions in listsinceblock")
|
|
listsinceblock = self.nodes[0].listsinceblock()
|
|
txAB1_listsinceblock = [d for d in listsinceblock['transactions'] if d['txid'] == txAB1 and d['category'] == 'send']
|
|
for tx in txAB1_listsinceblock:
|
|
assert_equal(tx['abandoned'], True)
|
|
assert_equal(tx['confirmations'], 0)
|
|
assert_equal(tx['trusted'], False)
|
|
|
|
# Verify that even with a low min relay fee, the tx is not reaccepted from wallet on startup once abandoned
|
|
self.restart_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.00001"])
|
|
assert self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['loaded']
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[0].getbalance(), balance)
|
|
|
|
# But if it is received again then it is unabandoned
|
|
# And since now in mempool, the change is available
|
|
# But its child tx remains abandoned
|
|
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("20") + Decimal("14.99998"))
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
# Send child tx again so it is unabandoned
|
|
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed2["hex"])
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("10") - Decimal("14.99998") + Decimal("24.9996"))
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
# Remove using high relay fee again
|
|
self.restart_node(0, extra_args=["-minrelaytxfee=0.0001"])
|
|
assert self.nodes[0].getmempoolinfo()['loaded']
|
|
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].getrawmempool()), 0)
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("24.9996"))
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
self.log.info("Test transactions conflicted by a double spend")
|
|
# Create a double spend of AB1 by spending again from only A's 10 output
|
|
# Mine double spend from node 1
|
|
inputs = []
|
|
inputs.append({"txid": txA, "vout": nA})
|
|
outputs = {}
|
|
outputs[self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()] = Decimal("9.9999")
|
|
tx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction(inputs, outputs)
|
|
signed = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(tx)
|
|
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(signed["hex"])
|
|
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
|
|
|
|
self.connect_nodes(0, 1)
|
|
self.sync_blocks()
|
|
|
|
tx_list = self.nodes[0].listtransactions()
|
|
|
|
conflicted = [tx for tx in tx_list if tx["confirmations"] < 0]
|
|
assert_equal(4, len(conflicted))
|
|
|
|
wallet_conflicts = [tx for tx in conflicted if tx["walletconflicts"]]
|
|
assert_equal(2, len(wallet_conflicts))
|
|
|
|
double_spends = [tx for tx in tx_list if tx["walletconflicts"] and tx["confirmations"] > 0]
|
|
assert_equal(1, len(double_spends))
|
|
double_spend = double_spends[0]
|
|
|
|
# Test the properties of the conflicted transactions, i.e. with confirmations < 0.
|
|
for tx in conflicted:
|
|
assert_equal(tx["abandoned"], False)
|
|
assert_equal(tx["confirmations"], -1)
|
|
assert_equal(tx["trusted"], False)
|
|
|
|
# Test the properties of the double-spend transaction, i.e. having wallet conflicts and confirmations > 0.
|
|
assert_equal(double_spend["abandoned"], False)
|
|
assert_equal(double_spend["confirmations"], 1)
|
|
assert "trusted" not in double_spend.keys() # "trusted" only returned if tx has 0 or negative confirmations.
|
|
|
|
# Test the walletconflicts field of each.
|
|
for tx in wallet_conflicts:
|
|
assert_equal(double_spend["walletconflicts"], [tx["txid"]])
|
|
assert_equal(tx["walletconflicts"], [double_spend["txid"]])
|
|
|
|
# Verify that B and C's 10 BTC outputs are available for spending again because AB1 is now conflicted
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
assert_equal(newbalance, balance + Decimal("20"))
|
|
balance = newbalance
|
|
|
|
# There is currently a minor bug around this and so this test doesn't work. See Issue #7315
|
|
# Invalidate the block with the double spend and B's 10 BTC output should no longer be available
|
|
# Don't think C's should either
|
|
self.nodes[0].invalidateblock(self.nodes[0].getbestblockhash())
|
|
newbalance = self.nodes[0].getbalance()
|
|
#assert_equal(newbalance, balance - Decimal("10"))
|
|
self.log.info("If balance has not declined after invalidateblock then out of mempool wallet tx which is no longer")
|
|
self.log.info("conflicted has not resumed causing its inputs to be seen as spent. See Issue #7315")
|
|
assert_equal(balance, newbalance)
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
AbandonConflictTest().main()
|