mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-26 12:32:48 +01:00
4aa197dbdb
fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef test: Move boost/stdlib includes last (MarcoFalke) fa488f131fd4f5bab0d01376c5a5013306f1abcd scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke) fac5c373006a9e4bcbb56843bb85f1aca4d87599 scripted-diff: Sort test includes (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: When writing tests, often includes need to be added or removed. Currently the list of includes is not sorted, so developers that write tests and have `clang-format` installed will either have an unrelated change (sorting) included in their commit or they will have to manually undo the sort. This pull preempts both issues by just sorting all includes in one commit. Please be aware that this is **NOT** a change to policy to enforce clang-format or any other developer guideline or process. Developers are free to use whatever tool they want, see also #18651. Edit: Also includes a commit to bump the copyright headers, so that the touched files don't need to be touched again for that. ACKs for top commit: practicalswift: ACK fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef jonatack: ACK fa4632c41714dfaa, light review and sanity checks with gcc build and clang fuzz build Tree-SHA512: 130a8d073a379ba556b1e64104d37c46b671425c0aef0ed725fd60156a95e8dc83fb6f0b5330b2f8152cf5daaf3983b4aca5e75812598f2626c39fd12b88b180
208 lines
6.2 KiB
Python
208 lines
6.2 KiB
Python
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2015-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
|
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
|
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
|
"""
|
|
Templates for constructing various sorts of invalid transactions.
|
|
|
|
These templates (or an iterator over all of them) can be reused in different
|
|
contexts to test using a number of invalid transaction types.
|
|
|
|
Hopefully this makes it easier to get coverage of a full variety of tx
|
|
validation checks through different interfaces (AcceptBlock, AcceptToMemPool,
|
|
etc.) without repeating ourselves.
|
|
|
|
Invalid tx cases not covered here can be found by running:
|
|
|
|
$ diff \
|
|
<(grep -IREho "bad-txns[a-zA-Z-]+" src | sort -u) \
|
|
<(grep -IEho "bad-txns[a-zA-Z-]+" test/functional/data/invalid_txs.py | sort -u)
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
import abc
|
|
|
|
from test_framework.messages import (
|
|
COutPoint,
|
|
CTransaction,
|
|
CTxIn,
|
|
CTxOut,
|
|
MAX_MONEY,
|
|
)
|
|
from test_framework import script as sc
|
|
from test_framework.blocktools import create_tx_with_script, MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS
|
|
|
|
basic_p2sh = sc.CScript([sc.OP_HASH160, sc.hash160(sc.CScript([sc.OP_0])), sc.OP_EQUAL])
|
|
|
|
|
|
class BadTxTemplate:
|
|
"""Allows simple construction of a certain kind of invalid tx. Base class to be subclassed."""
|
|
__metaclass__ = abc.ABCMeta
|
|
|
|
# The expected error code given by bitcoind upon submission of the tx.
|
|
reject_reason = ""
|
|
|
|
# Only specified if it differs from mempool acceptance error.
|
|
block_reject_reason = ""
|
|
|
|
# Do we expect to be disconnected after submitting this tx?
|
|
expect_disconnect = False
|
|
|
|
# Is this tx considered valid when included in a block, but not for acceptance into
|
|
# the mempool (i.e. does it violate policy but not consensus)?
|
|
valid_in_block = False
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, *, spend_tx=None, spend_block=None):
|
|
self.spend_tx = spend_block.vtx[0] if spend_block else spend_tx
|
|
self.spend_avail = sum(o.nValue for o in self.spend_tx.vout)
|
|
self.valid_txin = CTxIn(COutPoint(self.spend_tx.sha256, 0), b"", 0xffffffff)
|
|
|
|
@abc.abstractmethod
|
|
def get_tx(self, *args, **kwargs):
|
|
"""Return a CTransaction that is invalid per the subclass."""
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
class OutputMissing(BadTxTemplate):
|
|
reject_reason = "bad-txns-vout-empty"
|
|
expect_disconnect = True
|
|
|
|
def get_tx(self):
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
tx.vin.append(self.valid_txin)
|
|
tx.calc_sha256()
|
|
return tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
class InputMissing(BadTxTemplate):
|
|
reject_reason = "bad-txns-vin-empty"
|
|
expect_disconnect = True
|
|
|
|
def get_tx(self):
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(0, sc.CScript([sc.OP_TRUE] * 100)))
|
|
tx.calc_sha256()
|
|
return tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
# The following check prevents exploit of lack of merkle
|
|
# tree depth commitment (CVE-2017-12842)
|
|
class SizeTooSmall(BadTxTemplate):
|
|
reject_reason = "tx-size-small"
|
|
expect_disconnect = False
|
|
valid_in_block = True
|
|
|
|
def get_tx(self):
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
tx.vin.append(self.valid_txin)
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(0, sc.CScript([sc.OP_TRUE])))
|
|
tx.calc_sha256()
|
|
return tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
class BadInputOutpointIndex(BadTxTemplate):
|
|
# Won't be rejected - nonexistent outpoint index is treated as an orphan since the coins
|
|
# database can't distinguish between spent outpoints and outpoints which never existed.
|
|
reject_reason = None
|
|
expect_disconnect = False
|
|
|
|
def get_tx(self):
|
|
num_indices = len(self.spend_tx.vin)
|
|
bad_idx = num_indices + 100
|
|
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.spend_tx.sha256, bad_idx), b"", 0xffffffff))
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(0, basic_p2sh))
|
|
tx.calc_sha256()
|
|
return tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
class DuplicateInput(BadTxTemplate):
|
|
reject_reason = 'bad-txns-inputs-duplicate'
|
|
expect_disconnect = True
|
|
|
|
def get_tx(self):
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
tx.vin.append(self.valid_txin)
|
|
tx.vin.append(self.valid_txin)
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(1, basic_p2sh))
|
|
tx.calc_sha256()
|
|
return tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
class NonexistentInput(BadTxTemplate):
|
|
reject_reason = None # Added as an orphan tx.
|
|
expect_disconnect = False
|
|
|
|
def get_tx(self):
|
|
tx = CTransaction()
|
|
tx.vin.append(CTxIn(COutPoint(self.spend_tx.sha256 + 1, 0), b"", 0xffffffff))
|
|
tx.vin.append(self.valid_txin)
|
|
tx.vout.append(CTxOut(1, basic_p2sh))
|
|
tx.calc_sha256()
|
|
return tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
class SpendTooMuch(BadTxTemplate):
|
|
reject_reason = 'bad-txns-in-belowout'
|
|
expect_disconnect = True
|
|
|
|
def get_tx(self):
|
|
return create_tx_with_script(
|
|
self.spend_tx, 0, script_pub_key=basic_p2sh, amount=(self.spend_avail + 1))
|
|
|
|
|
|
class CreateNegative(BadTxTemplate):
|
|
reject_reason = 'bad-txns-vout-negative'
|
|
expect_disconnect = True
|
|
|
|
def get_tx(self):
|
|
return create_tx_with_script(self.spend_tx, 0, amount=-1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class CreateTooLarge(BadTxTemplate):
|
|
reject_reason = 'bad-txns-vout-toolarge'
|
|
expect_disconnect = True
|
|
|
|
def get_tx(self):
|
|
return create_tx_with_script(self.spend_tx, 0, amount=MAX_MONEY + 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class CreateSumTooLarge(BadTxTemplate):
|
|
reject_reason = 'bad-txns-txouttotal-toolarge'
|
|
expect_disconnect = True
|
|
|
|
def get_tx(self):
|
|
tx = create_tx_with_script(self.spend_tx, 0, amount=MAX_MONEY)
|
|
tx.vout = [tx.vout[0]] * 2
|
|
tx.calc_sha256()
|
|
return tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
class InvalidOPIFConstruction(BadTxTemplate):
|
|
reject_reason = "mandatory-script-verify-flag-failed (Invalid OP_IF construction)"
|
|
expect_disconnect = True
|
|
valid_in_block = True
|
|
|
|
def get_tx(self):
|
|
return create_tx_with_script(
|
|
self.spend_tx, 0, script_sig=b'\x64' * 35,
|
|
amount=(self.spend_avail // 2))
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TooManySigops(BadTxTemplate):
|
|
reject_reason = "bad-txns-too-many-sigops"
|
|
block_reject_reason = "bad-blk-sigops, out-of-bounds SigOpCount"
|
|
expect_disconnect = False
|
|
|
|
def get_tx(self):
|
|
lotsa_checksigs = sc.CScript([sc.OP_CHECKSIG] * (MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS))
|
|
return create_tx_with_script(
|
|
self.spend_tx, 0,
|
|
script_pub_key=lotsa_checksigs,
|
|
amount=1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def iter_all_templates():
|
|
"""Iterate through all bad transaction template types."""
|
|
return BadTxTemplate.__subclasses__()
|