e4f8b7097d
5e61532e72c1021fda9c7b213bd9cf397cb3a802 util: optimizes HexStr (Martin Leitner-Ankerl) 4e2b99f72a90b956f3050095abed4949aff9b516 bench: Adds a benchmark for HexStr (Martin Leitner-Ankerl) 67c8411c37b483caa2fe3f7f4f40b68ed2a9bcf7 test: Adds a test for HexStr that checks all 256 bytes (Martin Leitner-Ankerl) Pull request description: In my benchmark, this rewrite improves runtime 27% (g++) to 46% (clang++) for the benchmark `HexStrBench`: g++ 11.2.0 | ns/byte | byte/s | err% | ins/byte | cyc/byte | IPC | bra/byte | miss% | total | benchmark |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:---------- | 0.94 | 1,061,381,310.36 | 0.7% | 12.00 | 3.01 | 3.990 | 1.00 | 0.0% | 0.01 | `HexStrBench` master | 0.68 | 1,465,366,544.25 | 1.7% | 6.00 | 2.16 | 2.778 | 1.00 | 0.0% | 0.01 | `HexStrBench` branch clang++ 13.0.1 | ns/byte | byte/s | err% | ins/byte | cyc/byte | IPC | bra/byte | miss% | total | benchmark |--------------------:|--------------------:|--------:|----------------:|----------------:|-------:|---------------:|--------:|----------:|:---------- | 0.80 | 1,244,713,415.92 | 0.9% | 10.00 | 2.56 | 3.913 | 0.50 | 0.0% | 0.01 | `HexStrBench` master | 0.43 | 2,324,188,940.72 | 0.2% | 4.00 | 1.37 | 2.914 | 0.25 | 0.0% | 0.01 | `HexStrBench` branch Note that the idea for this change comes from denis2342 in #23364. This is a rewrite so no unaligned accesses occur. Also, the lookup table is now calculated at compile time, which hopefully makes the code a bit easier to review. ACKs for top commit: laanwj: Code review ACK 5e61532e72c1021fda9c7b213bd9cf397cb3a802 aureleoules: tACK 5e61532e72c1021fda9c7b213bd9cf397cb3a802. theStack: ACK 5e61532e72c1021fda9c7b213bd9cf397cb3a802 🚤 Tree-SHA512: 40b53d5908332473ef24918d3a80ad1292b60566c02585fa548eb4c3189754971be5a70325f4968fce6d714df898b52d9357aba14d4753a8c70e6ffd273a2319 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .github | ||
| .tx | ||
| build-aux/m4 | ||
| ci | ||
| contrib | ||
| depends | ||
| doc | ||
| share | ||
| src | ||
| test | ||
| .cirrus.yml | ||
| .dockerignore | ||
| .editorconfig | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .gitlab-ci.yml | ||
| .python-version | ||
| .style.yapf | ||
| autogen.sh | ||
| CMakeLists.txt | ||
| configure.ac | ||
| CONTRIBUTING.md | ||
| COPYING | ||
| INSTALL.md | ||
| libdashconsensus.pc.in | ||
| Makefile.am | ||
| README.md | ||
| SECURITY.md | ||
Dash Core staging tree
| CI | master | develop |
|---|---|---|
| Gitlab |  |
 |
For an immediately usable, binary version of the Dash Core software, see https://www.dash.org/downloads/.
Further information about Dash Core is available in ./doc/.
What is Dash?
Dash is an experimental digital currency that enables instant, private payments to anyone, anywhere in the world. Dash uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority: managing transactions and issuing money are carried out collectively by the network. Dash Core is the name of the open source software which enables the use of this currency.
For more information read the original Dash whitepaper.
License
Dash Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.
Development Process
The master branch is meant to be stable. Development is normally done in separate branches.
Tags are created to indicate new official,
stable release versions of Dash Core.
The develop branch is regularly built (see doc/build-*.md for instructions) and tested, but is not guaranteed to be
completely stable.
The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md and useful hints for developers can be found in doc/developer-notes.md.
Build / Compile from Source
The ./configure, make, and cmake steps, as well as build dependencies, are in ./doc/ as well:
- Linux: ./doc/build-unix.md
Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, Arch, and others - macOS: ./doc/build-osx.md
- Windows: ./doc/build-windows.md
- OpenBSD: ./doc/build-openbsd.md
- FreeBSD: ./doc/build-freebsd.md
- NetBSD: ./doc/build-netbsd.md
Testing
Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.
Automated Testing
Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to
submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run
(assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running
and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.
There are also regression and integration tests, written
in Python.
These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py
The CI (Continuous Integration) systems make sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and macOS, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.
Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing
Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.
Translations
Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Dash Core's Transifex page.
Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.
Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.