mirror of
https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git
synced 2024-12-26 04:22:55 +01:00
b07a7b810c
* Merge #11796: [tests] Functional test naming convention5fecd84[tests] Remove redundant import in blocktools.py test (Anthony Towns)9b20bb4[tests] Check tests conform to naming convention (Anthony Towns)7250b4e[tests] README.md nit fixes (Anthony Towns)82b2712[tests] move witness util functions to blocktools.py (John Newbery)1e10854[tests] [docs] update README for new test naming scheme (John Newbery) Pull request description: Splitting #11774 into two parts -- this part updates the README with the proposed naming convention, and adds some checks to test_runner.py that the number of tests violating the naming convention doesn't increase too much. Idea is this part of the change should not introduce merge conflicts or require much rebasing, so reviews of the complicated bits won't become invalidated too often; while the second part will just be file renames, which will require regular rebasing and will introduce merge conflicts with pending PRs, but can be merged later, and should also be much easier to review, since it will only include relatively trivial changes. Tree-SHA512: b96557d41714addbbfe2aed62fb5a48639eaeb1eb3aba30ac1b3a86bb3cb8d796c6247f9c414c4695c4bf54c0ec9968ac88e2f88fb62483bc1a2f89368f7fc80 * update violation count Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * Merge #11774: [tests] Rename functional tests6f881cc880[tests] Remove EXPECTED_VIOLATION_COUNT (Anthony Towns)3150b3fea7[tests] Rename misc functional tests. (Anthony Towns)81b79f2c39[tests] Rename rpc_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)61b8f7f273[tests] Rename p2p_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)90600bc7db[tests] Rename wallet_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns)ca6523d0c8[tests] Rename feature_* functional tests. (Anthony Towns) Pull request description: This PR changes the functional tests to have a consistent naming scheme: tests for individual RPC methods are named rpc_... tests for interfaces (REST, ZMQ, RPC features) are named interface_... tests that explicitly test the p2p interface are named p2p_... tests for wallet features are named wallet_... tests for mining features are named mining_... tests for mempool behaviour are named mempool_... tests for full features that aren't wallet/mining/mempool are named feature_... Rationale: it's sometimes difficult for new contributors to know what's already covered by existing tests and where new tests should be added. Naming in a consistent fashion makes it easier to see what's already covered at a glance. Tree-SHA512: 4246790552d42bbd95f6d5bdf67702b81b3b2c583ce7eaf1fe6d8e254721279b47315973c6e9ae82dad6e4c747f12188160764bf2624c0f8f3b4d39330ec8b16 * rename tests and edit associated strings to align test-suite with test name standards Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> * fix grammar in test/functional/test_runner.py Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com> * ci: Fix excluded test names * rename feature_privatesend.py to rpc_privatesend.py Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org> Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dustinface <35775977+xdustinface@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: xdustinface <xdustinfacex@gmail.com>
86 lines
4.4 KiB
Python
Executable File
86 lines
4.4 KiB
Python
Executable File
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
|
# Copyright (c) 2014-2016 The Bitcoin Core developers
|
|
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
|
|
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
|
|
"""Test gettxoutproof and verifytxoutproof RPCs."""
|
|
|
|
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
|
|
from test_framework.util import *
|
|
|
|
class MerkleBlockTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
|
def set_test_params(self):
|
|
self.num_nodes = 4
|
|
self.setup_clean_chain = True
|
|
# Nodes 0/1 are "wallet" nodes, Nodes 2/3 are used for testing
|
|
self.extra_args = [[], [], [], ["-txindex"]]
|
|
|
|
def setup_network(self):
|
|
self.setup_nodes()
|
|
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 1)
|
|
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 2)
|
|
connect_nodes(self.nodes[0], 3)
|
|
|
|
self.sync_all()
|
|
|
|
def run_test(self):
|
|
self.log.info("Mining blocks...")
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(105)
|
|
self.sync_all()
|
|
|
|
chain_height = self.nodes[1].getblockcount()
|
|
assert_equal(chain_height, 105)
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[1].getbalance(), 0)
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].getbalance(), 0)
|
|
|
|
tx_fee = Decimal('0.00001')
|
|
node0utxos = self.nodes[0].listunspent(1)
|
|
tx1 = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction([node0utxos.pop()], {self.nodes[1].getnewaddress(): 500 - tx_fee})
|
|
txid1 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(self.nodes[0].signrawtransaction(tx1)["hex"])
|
|
tx2 = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction([node0utxos.pop()], {self.nodes[1].getnewaddress(): 500 - tx_fee})
|
|
txid2 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(self.nodes[0].signrawtransaction(tx2)["hex"])
|
|
# This will raise an exception because the transaction is not yet in a block
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Transaction not yet in block", self.nodes[0].gettxoutproof, [txid1])
|
|
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
|
blockhash = self.nodes[0].getblockhash(chain_height + 1)
|
|
self.sync_all()
|
|
|
|
txlist = []
|
|
blocktxn = self.nodes[0].getblock(blockhash, True)["tx"]
|
|
txlist.append(blocktxn[1])
|
|
txlist.append(blocktxn[2])
|
|
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].verifytxoutproof(self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof([txid1])), [txid1])
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].verifytxoutproof(self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof([txid1, txid2])), txlist)
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].verifytxoutproof(self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof([txid1, txid2], blockhash)), txlist)
|
|
|
|
txin_spent = self.nodes[1].listunspent(1).pop()
|
|
tx3 = self.nodes[1].createrawtransaction([txin_spent], {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress(): 500 - tx_fee*2})
|
|
txid3 = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(self.nodes[1].signrawtransaction(tx3)["hex"])
|
|
self.nodes[0].generate(1)
|
|
self.sync_all()
|
|
|
|
txid_spent = txin_spent["txid"]
|
|
txid_unspent = txid1 if txin_spent["txid"] != txid1 else txid2
|
|
|
|
# We can't find the block from a fully-spent tx
|
|
# Doesn't apply to Dash Core - we have txindex always on
|
|
# assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Transaction not yet in block", self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof, [txid_spent])
|
|
# We can get the proof if we specify the block
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].verifytxoutproof(self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof([txid_spent], blockhash)), [txid_spent])
|
|
# We can't get the proof if we specify a non-existent block
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Block not found", self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof, [txid_spent], "00000000000000000000000000000000")
|
|
# We can get the proof if the transaction is unspent
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].verifytxoutproof(self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof([txid_unspent])), [txid_unspent])
|
|
# We can get the proof if we provide a list of transactions and one of them is unspent. The ordering of the list should not matter.
|
|
assert_equal(sorted(self.nodes[2].verifytxoutproof(self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof([txid1, txid2]))), sorted(txlist))
|
|
assert_equal(sorted(self.nodes[2].verifytxoutproof(self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof([txid2, txid1]))), sorted(txlist))
|
|
# We can always get a proof if we have a -txindex
|
|
assert_equal(self.nodes[2].verifytxoutproof(self.nodes[3].gettxoutproof([txid_spent])), [txid_spent])
|
|
# We can't get a proof if we specify transactions from different blocks
|
|
assert_raises_rpc_error(-5, "Not all transactions found in specified or retrieved block", self.nodes[2].gettxoutproof, [txid1, txid3])
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|
MerkleBlockTest().main()
|