d84e78e [wallet] Specify wallet name in wallet loading errors (John Newbery)
a6da027 Reject invalid wallet files (João Barbosa)
3ef77a0 Reject duplicate wallet filenames (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR prevents loading the same wallet more than once in a multi wallet scenario. It also prevents loading with invalid files: non regular files or symlinks.
Tree-SHA512: 45bf814096bb788db1c76ff334e679a10686cee7d9c8cd48fe5d924031353ace271f6fb0d4af49a34246d336945515c176920a552be7b9fbe07ab8e00e5f6e5e
df389bc Change wallet method disabled error text (Russell Yanofsky)
e526b3d Fix misleading "Method not found" multiwallet errors (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Raise RPC_WALLET_NOT_SPECIFIED instead of RPC_METHOD_NOT_FOUND when a required
wallet filename was not specified in an RPC call.
Also raise more specific RPC_WALLET_NOT_FOUND error instead of
RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER in case an invalid wallet was specified, for consistency.
Tree-SHA512: 6a8d885283f69bcfc28f2e08ac03eff02f9f8160a312ce2a90d868aa52533434fc0b4c4ab86547c2f09392338956df915637eaf7136a4fc105e6c8179f2d0ac8
05e023f Move CloseSocket out of SetSocketNonBlocking and pass SOCKET by const reference in SetSocket* functions (Dag Robole)
Pull request description:
Rationale:
Readability, SetSocketNonBlocking does what it says on the tin.
Consistency, More consistent with the rest of the API in this unit.
Reusability, SetSocketNonBlocking can also be used by clients that may not want to close the socket on failure.
This also moves the responsibility of closing the socket back to the caller that opened it, which in general should know better how and when to close it.
Tree-SHA512: 85027137f1b626e2b636549ee38cc757a587adcf464c84be6e65ca16e3b75d7ed1a1b21dd70dbe34c7c5d599af39e53b89932dfe3c74f91a22341ff3af5ea80a
876e92b Testing: listsinceblock should display all transactions that were affected since the given block, including transactions that were removed due to a reorg. (Karl-Johan Alm)
f999c46 listsinceblock: optionally find and list any transactions that were undone due to reorg when requesting a non-main chain block in a new 'removed' array. (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
The following scenario will not notify the caller of the fact `tx0` has been dropped:
1. User 1 receives BTC in tx0 from utxo1 in block aa1.
2. User 2 receives BTC in tx1 from utxo1 (same) in block bb1
3. User 1 sees 2 confirmations at block aa3.
4. Reorg into bb chain.
5. User 1 asks `listsinceblock aa3` and does not see that tx0 is now invalidated.
See `listsinceblock.py` commit for related test.
The proposed fix is to iterate from the given block down to the fork point, and to check each transaction in the blocks against the wallet, in addition to including all transactions from the fork point to the active chain tip (the current behavior). Any transactions that were present will now also be listed in the `listsinceblock` output in a new `replaced` array. This operation may be a bit heavy but the circumstances (and perceived frequency of occurrence) warrant it, I believe.
Example output:
```Python
{
'transactions': [],
'replaced': [
{
'walletconflicts': [],
'vout': 1,
'account': '',
'timereceived': 1485234857,
'time': 1485234857,
'amount': '1.00000000',
'bip125-replaceable': 'unknown',
'trusted': False,
'category': 'receive',
'txid': 'ce673859a30dee1d2ebdb3c05f2eea7b1da54baf68f93bb8bfe37c5f09ed22ff',
'address': 'miqEt4kWp9zSizwGGuUWLAmxEcTW9bFUnQ',
'label': '',
'confirmations': -7
}
],
'lastblock': '7a388f27d09e3699102a4ebf81597d974fc4c72093eeaa02adffbbf7527f6715'
}
```
I believe this addresses the comment by @luke-jr in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9516#issuecomment-274190081 but I could be wrong..
Tree-SHA512: 607b5dcaeccb9dc0d963d3de138c40490f3e923050b29821e6bd513d26beb587bddc748fbb194503fe618cfe34a6ed65d95e8d9c5764a882b6c5f976520cff35
d9d1bd3 nCheckDepth chain height fix (romanornr)
Pull request description:
````
if (nCheckDepth <= 0)
nCheckDepth = 1000000000; // suffices until the year 19000
if (nCheckDepth > chainActive.Height())
nCheckDepth = chainActive.Height();
````
These lines confuse me.
Correct me if I am wrong, but we can't check any more blocks than we have right?
If someone requests <= 0 it get set it into some huge number and then immediately limit it to the chain height in the following statement.
````
if (nCheckDepth > chainActive.Height())
nCheckDepth = chainActive.Height();
````
when using ````--checkblocks=Z```` When Z is ````0```` or any other negative number, it will check all blocks.
I think it should be changed to this maybe.
````
if (nCheckDepth <= 0 || nCheckDepth > chainActive.Height())
nCheckDepth = chainActive.Height();
````
Which gets rid of that huge number which is confusing for any other altcoins that have a different block time.
Tree-SHA512: 8ee0ae5f33b399fa74dc16926709694ccfe1fc8a043cba2f5d00884220ac1b9b13f2df4588041f4133be634e5c7b14f4eebe24294028dafe91581a97dbe627f3
0f402b9 Fix rare edge case of paying too many fees when transaction has no change. (Alex Morcos)
253cd7e Only reserve key for scriptChange once in CreateTransaction (Alex Morcos)
Pull request description:
This is an alternative to #10333
See commit messages.
The first commit is mostly code move, it just moves the change creation code out of the loop.
@instagibbs
Tree-SHA512: f16287ae0f0c6f09cf8b1f0db5880bb567ffa74a50898e3d1ef549ba592c6309ae1a9b251739f63a8bb622d48f03ce2dff9e7a57a6bac4afb4b95b0a86613ea8
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
5e3b7b5 Improve error reporting for estimaterawfee (Alex Morcos)
1fafd70 Add function to report highest estimate target tracked per horizon (Alex Morcos)
9c85b91 Change API to estimaterawfee (Alex Morcos)
Tree-SHA512: e624c6e7967e9e48abe49f5818bd674e5710e571cc093029d2f90d39fdfba3c1f30e83bf89f6dce97052b59a7d9636a64642ccfb26effd149c417d0afbed0c0b
2aef1f182 [Qt] migrate old fee slider value to new dropbown Always round up (conservative) (Jonas Schnelli)
bc1be90e3 [Qt] replace fee slider with a Dropdown, extend conf. targets (Jonas Schnelli)
Tree-SHA512: 53796cf0b434dd3db5d4680dbeb6231a7df8f15d88187178fd4db8917cd7fc60091ce2c1589fd93668fc94bb13f989aba5b7ef3792fa95ee1f9f21a15709e2d3
4dc1915 check for null values in rpc args and handle appropriately (Gregory Sanders)
999ef20 importmulti options are optional (Gregory Sanders)
a70d025 fixup some rpc param counting for rpc help (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
Audited where named args will fail to use correct default values or may fail when additional optional arguments are added.
Previously for these parameters, it was fine to omit them as positional arguments, but it would trigger UniValue runtime errors to set them to null, or to omit them while passing named parameters with greater positions (which would internally set earlier missing arguments to null). Now null values are treated the same as missing values so these errors do not occur.
Included a few other small fixes while working on it.
I didn't bother fixing account-based rpc calls.
Tree-SHA512: 8baf781a35bd48de7878d4726850a580dab80323d3416c1c146b4fa9062f8a233c03f37e8ae3f3159e9d04a8f39c326627ca64c14e1cb7ce72538f934ab2ae1e
2a96283 rpc: Update `generate` for developer notes (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
df7e2f0 rpc: Move the `generate` RPC call to rpcwallet (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Tree-SHA512: ec658d6178f8435dc54b9d9c6dd59f873055a8ae0c3f177c02049d77b93107dd5fc17a1ff56d50f051810d52fdf306846eaba2ef4fc8d2a6cfa831f57a1045c4
055d95f [wallet] return correct error code from resendwallettransaction (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
New code in #10995 uses `RPC_INVALID_REQUEST`. According to the comment in rpc/protocol.h:
```
// RPC_INVALID_REQUEST is internally mapped to HTTP_BAD_REQUEST (400).
// It should not be used for application-layer errors.
```
Change the returned error code to `RPC_WALLET_ERROR`
#11000 will need to be updated to test for the correct error code.
Tree-SHA512: 0201b3a2091adf17ad301825da5bd29f0ea7e284b5394cbef80483fc293a558acc849f74a0780bb8501acab324fc722e41ae049cffec7afb76884e26df4b809e
01699fb Fix resendwallettransactions assert failure if -walletbroadcast=0 (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This fixes#10981 in my preferred way.
Tree-SHA512: 2e43d3ac78d13c5d59db23a82c76c722cc3344767a8237617080e489296d27a98bb1b3bd469b2c9b289b57a9da3709c90448d7a23bcc2e1dfb791c4fd16be015
176c021 [qa] Test non-atomic chainstate writes (Suhas Daftuar)
d6af06d Dont create pcoinsTip until after ReplayBlocks. (Matt Corallo)
eaca1b7 Random db flush crash simulator (Pieter Wuille)
0580ee0 Adapt memory usage estimation for flushing (Pieter Wuille)
013a56a Non-atomic flushing using the blockchain as replay journal (Pieter Wuille)
b3a279c [MOVEONLY] Move LastCommonAncestor to chain (Pieter Wuille)
Tree-SHA512: 47ccc62303f9075c44d2a914be75bd6969ff881a857a2ff1227f05ec7def6f4c71c46680c5a28cb150c814999526797dc05cf2701fde1369c06169f46eccddee
cc5d38f4b Add option to attach a python debugger if test fails (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Adds a simple option to the test_framework to attach pdb if the test fails.
Helpful for catching and debugging intermittent failures: Run the test in a loop with this option. The first failure will cause execution to pause and nodes will be left running for interactive debugging.
@sdaftuar
Tree-SHA512: 01cfae15fa3f04ed6ec6a99fef60a6c6a59723429309e81eacd6767caf12f5758f59b337804291ecab33a38a2958f36e2b513d201bee72a2eeb207a67046f952
ee2d10a Check if sys/random.h is required for getentropy on OSX. (James Hilliard)
Pull request description:
This should check and include sys/random.h if required for osx as mentioned [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9821#issuecomment-290936636).
Tree-SHA512: e9491f67f2e8b2e6bcdbcbb8063295e844d5627daf5336e3e17b4a8027d888fa65a08e4580a745abdc35ffd8d86b4fc7434daaac172c4a06ab7566a2ed0bfb92
72f0060 Replace traditional for with ranged for in primitives (Dag Robole)
Pull request description:
Replace traditional for with ranged for in block and transaction primitives to improve readability
Tree-SHA512: c0fff603d2939149ca48b6aa72b59738a3658d49bd58b2d4ffbc85bdb774d8d5bb808fe526fe22bb9eb214de632834d373e2aab44f6019a83c0b09440cea6528
065039d [tests] Fix incorrect memory_cleanse(…) call in crypto_tests.cpp (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
`chKey` and `chIV` are pointers, not arrays :-)
Probably the result of copy-pasting of old code where the code was operating on arrays instead of pointers.
If I'm reading the code correctly the absence/presence of these `memory_cleanse(…)` calls won't alter the outcome of the test in question (`TestPassphraseSingle`) even if fixed. Therefore removing.
Tree-SHA512: a053b2817bedf6ef889744e546ce9a0f165dee94aef6850d9d6a6bb05b0018789597371ecf154a4aec8588c0ef5626ef08c23c35e35927f6b0497b5f086146fe
a2420ae Avoid unnecessary work in SetNetworkActive (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR adds an early return to avoid unnecessary notifications when the status doesn't change.
Tree-SHA512: 85d05ca6fa36cb581f94bc154d08bd72cd53f6a857173c6fb2f184058f9c0208c4cf5e5d196825a78339902d8f256688eb6793f99abc7be9c7cfac85136180d9
88af227 test: Make sure wallet.backup is created in temp path (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
This assures that we don't overwrite a random file called `wallet.backup` that happens to be in the current directory. It also assures that the temporary file will be cleaned up.
Noticed by Evan Klitzke, came up in discussion here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10880#discussion_r128460722
Tree-SHA512: 2d2c23c2deba26a1130a29279b3d8565b277eb90a98a6a6d7dd4948f5cbbd5ec5453b3082e3e4e21e0e2423e642bbd2f4433e4c21032d3c8cff27ee35e87e7e7
9737572 [Qt] Use wallet 0 in rpc console if running with multiple wallets (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Current master with multiwallet results in accessing wallet 0 in QT (send / receive / tx history / etc.), **but** the RPC console cannot access that wallet (only non-wallet commands work).
This is a quick solution to re-allow accessing the same wallet (Index 0) via RPC console in multiwallet.
The solutions design is not "state of the art" (should go over WalletModel). Ideally we work on an overall multiwallet support for the GUI (which then would remove this change).
I think we should consider this as a bugfix.
Tree-SHA512: 16cf844662248ffd3d82c7d0cbe5879f231fbc7d4f5a4aab4180a9087018519c98301e4ac311eaec2cc39dddf25d3edf9be99a6622ea682c138a820a9b21fd0c
6b9faf7 [QA] add basic multiwallet test (Jonas Schnelli)
979d0b8 [tests] [wallet] Add wallet endpoint support to authproxy (John Newbery)
76603b1 Select wallet based on the given endpoint (Jonas Schnelli)
32c9710 Fix test_bitcoin circular dependency issue (Jonas Schnelli)
31e0720 Add wallet endpoint support to bitcoin-cli (-usewallet) (Jonas Schnelli)
dd2185c Register wallet endpoint (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Alternative for #10829 and #10650.
It adds the most simplest form of wallet based endpoint support (`/wallet/<filename>`).
No v1 and no node/wallet endpoint split.
Tree-SHA512: 23de1fd2f9b48d94682928b582fb6909e16ca507c2ee19e1f989d5a4f3aa706194c4b1fe8854d1d79ba531b7092434239776cae1ae715ff536e829424f59f9be
dba485d init: Factor out AppInitLockDataDirectory (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Alternative to #10818, alternative solution to #10815.
After this change: All the AppInit steps before and inclusive AppInitLockDataDirectory must not have Shutdown() called in case of failure. Only when AppInitMain fails, Shutdown should be called.
Changes the GUI and bitcoind code to consistently do this.
Tree-SHA512: 393e1a0ae05eb8e791025069e3ac4f6f3cdeb459ec63feda85d01cf6696ab3fed7632b6a0ac3641b8c7015af51d46756b5bba77f5e5f0c446f0c2dea58bbc92e
