This RPC test will test both the activation mechanism of the first versionbits soft fork as well as testing many code branches of the consensus logic for BIP's 68, 112, and 113.
- Replace NOP3 with CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (BIP112)
<nSequence> CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY -> <nSequence>
- Fails if txin.nSequence < nSequence, allowing funds of a txout to be locked for a number of blocks or a duration of time after its inclusion in a block.
- Pull most of CheckLockTime() out into VerifyLockTime(), a local function that will be reused for CheckSequence()
- Add bitwise AND operator to CScriptNum
- Enable CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY as a standard script verify flag
- Transactions that fail CSV verification will be rejected from the mempool, making it easy to test the feature. However blocks containing "invalid" CSV-using transactions will still be accepted; this is *not* the soft-fork required to actually enable CSV for production use.
SequenceLocks functions are used to evaluate sequence lock times or heights per BIP 68.
The majority of this code is copied from maaku in #6312
Further credit: btcdrak, sipa, NicolasDorier
"do not meet pay the minimum relay fee" ? I can understand English language quite well, but that I do not understand. So, if it's not an semantic nonsense, I would suggest to write it in more simple English.
b460004 release-notes: Minor corrections and clarifications re Priority (Luke Dashjr)
3450f4c release-notes: Significantly rewrite priority transactions section (Gregory Maxwell)
d0dbb6d release-notes: Remove suggestion to use 0.11 (Luke Dashjr)
73a0375 release-notes: Mention possibility of priority removal in 0.13, uncertainty of priority calculation being changed back, and request community input (Luke Dashjr)
4b8d2bc release-notes: Cover priority changes correctly, removing mentions of possible futures (Luke Dashjr)
If number of conflict confirms cannot be determined, this means
that the block is still unknown or not yet part of the main chain,
for example during a reindex. Do nothing in that case,
instead of crash with an assertion.
Fixes#7234.
Github-Pull: #7491
Rebased-From: 40e7b61835cbe5fd471d0b4b71972526bf0e523c
A WWW-Authenticate header must be present in the 401
response to make clients know that they can authenticate,
and how.
WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="jsonrpc"
Fixes#7462.
Github-Pull: #7472
Rebased-From: 7c06fbd8f58058d77c3e9da841811201d2e45e92
