dash/test/functional/rpc_psbt.py

358 lines
21 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Copyright (c) 2018-2020 The Bitcoin Core developers
# Distributed under the MIT software license, see the accompanying
# file COPYING or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
"""Test the Partially Signed Transaction RPCs.
"""
from decimal import Decimal
from test_framework.test_framework import BitcoinTestFramework
from test_framework.util import (
assert_equal,
assert_greater_than,
assert_raises_rpc_error,
find_output
)
import json
import os
# Create one-input, one-output, no-fee transaction:
class PSBTTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
def set_test_params(self):
self.num_nodes = 3
self.supports_cli = False
def skip_test_if_missing_module(self):
self.skip_if_no_wallet()
def run_test(self):
# Create and fund a raw tx for sending 10 DASH
psbtx1 = self.nodes[0].walletcreatefundedpsbt([], {self.nodes[2].getnewaddress():10})['psbt']
# Node 1 should not be able to add anything to it but still return the psbtx same as before
psbtx = self.nodes[1].walletprocesspsbt(psbtx1)['psbt']
assert_equal(psbtx1, psbtx)
# Sign the transaction and send
signed_tx = self.nodes[0].walletprocesspsbt(psbtx)['psbt']
final_tx = self.nodes[0].finalizepsbt(signed_tx)['hex']
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(final_tx)
2020-08-31 13:19:50 +02:00
# Manually selected inputs can be locked:
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].listlockunspent()), 0)
utxo1 = self.nodes[0].listunspent()[0]
psbtx1 = self.nodes[0].walletcreatefundedpsbt([{"txid": utxo1['txid'], "vout": utxo1['vout']}], {self.nodes[2].getnewaddress():1}, 0,{"lockUnspents": True})["psbt"]
assert_equal(len(self.nodes[0].listlockunspent()), 1)
# Locks are ignored for manually selected inputs
self.nodes[0].walletcreatefundedpsbt([{"txid": utxo1['txid'], "vout": utxo1['vout']}], {self.nodes[2].getnewaddress():1}, 0)
# Create p2sh and p2pkh addresses
pubkey0 = self.nodes[0].getaddressinfo(self.nodes[0].getnewaddress())['pubkey']
pubkey1 = self.nodes[1].getaddressinfo(self.nodes[1].getnewaddress())['pubkey']
pubkey2 = self.nodes[2].getaddressinfo(self.nodes[2].getnewaddress())['pubkey']
p2sh = self.nodes[1].addmultisigaddress(2, [pubkey0, pubkey1, pubkey2])['address']
p2pkh = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
# fund those addresses
rawtx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction([], {p2sh:10, p2pkh:10})
rawtx = self.nodes[0].fundrawtransaction(rawtx, {"changePosition":2})
signed_tx = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawtx['hex'])['hex']
txid = self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(signed_tx)
self.nodes[0].generate(6)
self.sync_all()
# Find the output pos
p2sh_pos = -1
p2pkh_pos = -1
decoded = self.nodes[0].decoderawtransaction(signed_tx)
for out in decoded['vout']:
if out['scriptPubKey']['addresses'][0] == p2sh:
p2sh_pos = out['n']
elif out['scriptPubKey']['addresses'][0] == p2pkh:
p2pkh_pos = out['n']
# spend single key from node 1
Merge #19597: test: test decodepsbt fee calculation (count input value only once per UTXO) 82dee87933ed0714976ff4eb9657acfc13c6de84 test: test decodepsbt fee calculation (count input value only once per UTXO) (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: Fixes #19523, adding a simple test to `rpc_psbt.py` that checks that the decodepsbt fee matches the one given by the wallet (`walletcreatefundedpsbt`). This is in particular important for PSBTs with segwit inputs that have both a witness- and a non-witness-UTXO type set. Example test run after reverting commit 75122780e2c46505d977e24c5612dfa9442ab754 ("Increment input value sum only once per UTXO in decodepsbt"): ``` $ test/functional/rpc_psbt.py 2020-07-26T11:31:44.862000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test__sutcd4y 20.00007580 2020-07-26T11:31:47.073000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/honeybadger/buidl/bitcoin_thestack/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 118, in main self.run_test() File "test/functional/rpc_psbt.py", line 166, in run_test assert_equal(decoded['fee'], created_psbt['fee']) File "/home/honeybadger/buidl/bitcoin_thestack/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 49, in assert_equal raise AssertionError("not(%s)" % " == ".join(str(arg) for arg in (thing1, thing2) + args)) AssertionError: not(20.00007580 == 0.00007580) 2020-07-26T11:31:47.125000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes ...... ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 82dee87933ed0714976ff4eb9657acfc13c6de84 Tree-SHA512: 296b8a701f851d482ef6200c6cbf0cf0257a79a828ac6dbc39b05d8c2d839c6fdb9d3f5a084015295cfa3eac7c11faa2f2d52e619c11627b04c75150eead8330
2020-07-30 09:46:12 +02:00
created_psbt = self.nodes[1].walletcreatefundedpsbt([{"txid":txid,"vout":p2pkh_pos}], {self.nodes[1].getnewaddress():9.99})
walletprocesspsbt_out = self.nodes[1].walletprocesspsbt(created_psbt['psbt'])
Merge #19215: psbt: Include and allow both non_witness_utxo and witness_utxo for segwit inputs 84d295e51341a126a6c3cbeea7a8caa04c7b5bc3 tests: Check that segwit inputs in psbt have both UTXO types (Andrew Chow) 46004790588c24174a0bec49b540d158ce163ffd psbt: always put a non_witness_utxo and don't remove it (Andrew Chow) 5279d8bc07d601fe6a67ad665fbc7591fe73c7de psbt: Allow both non_witness_utxo and witness_utxo (Andrew Chow) 72f6bec1da198764d4648a10a61c485e7ab65e9e rpc: show both UTXOs in decodepsbt (Andrew Chow) Pull request description: Due to recent changes to hardware wallets, the full previous transaction will need to be provided for segwit inputs. Since some software may be checking for the existence of a `witness_utxo` to determine whether to produce a segwit signature, we keep that field to ease the transition. Because all of the sanity checks implemented by the `IsSane` functions were related to having mixed segwit and non-segwit data in a PSBT, those functions are removed as those checks are no longer proper. Some tests are updated/removed to accommodate this and a simple test added to check that both UTXOs are being added to segwit inputs. As discussed in the wallet IRC meeting, our own signer will not require `non_witness_utxo` for segwit inputs. ACKs for top commit: Sjors: utACK 84d295e51341a126a6c3cbeea7a8caa04c7b5bc3 (didn't retest compared to 836d6fc, but fortunately HWI's CI tracks our master branch, with a bunch of hardware wallet simulators) ryanofsky: Code review re-ACK 84d295e51341a126a6c3cbeea7a8caa04c7b5bc3. No changes since last review, but now I understand the context better. I think it would good to improve the comments as suggested https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19215#discussion_r447889473 and maybe refer to meshcollider: utACK 84d295e51341a126a6c3cbeea7a8caa04c7b5bc3 Tree-SHA512: ccc1fd3c16ac3859f5aca4fa489bd40f68be0b81bbdc4dd51188bbf28827a8642dc8b605a37318e5f16cf40f1c4910052dace2f27eca21bb58435f02a443e940
2020-07-02 22:53:53 +02:00
# Make sure it has both types of UTXOs
decoded = self.nodes[1].decodepsbt(walletprocesspsbt_out['psbt'])
assert 'non_witness_utxo' in decoded['inputs'][0]
Merge #19597: test: test decodepsbt fee calculation (count input value only once per UTXO) 82dee87933ed0714976ff4eb9657acfc13c6de84 test: test decodepsbt fee calculation (count input value only once per UTXO) (Sebastian Falbesoner) Pull request description: Fixes #19523, adding a simple test to `rpc_psbt.py` that checks that the decodepsbt fee matches the one given by the wallet (`walletcreatefundedpsbt`). This is in particular important for PSBTs with segwit inputs that have both a witness- and a non-witness-UTXO type set. Example test run after reverting commit 75122780e2c46505d977e24c5612dfa9442ab754 ("Increment input value sum only once per UTXO in decodepsbt"): ``` $ test/functional/rpc_psbt.py 2020-07-26T11:31:44.862000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/bitcoin_func_test__sutcd4y 20.00007580 2020-07-26T11:31:47.073000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/honeybadger/buidl/bitcoin_thestack/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 118, in main self.run_test() File "test/functional/rpc_psbt.py", line 166, in run_test assert_equal(decoded['fee'], created_psbt['fee']) File "/home/honeybadger/buidl/bitcoin_thestack/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 49, in assert_equal raise AssertionError("not(%s)" % " == ".join(str(arg) for arg in (thing1, thing2) + args)) AssertionError: not(20.00007580 == 0.00007580) 2020-07-26T11:31:47.125000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes ...... ``` ACKs for top commit: achow101: ACK 82dee87933ed0714976ff4eb9657acfc13c6de84 Tree-SHA512: 296b8a701f851d482ef6200c6cbf0cf0257a79a828ac6dbc39b05d8c2d839c6fdb9d3f5a084015295cfa3eac7c11faa2f2d52e619c11627b04c75150eead8330
2020-07-30 09:46:12 +02:00
# Check decodepsbt fee calculation (input values shall only be counted once per UTXO)
assert_equal(decoded['fee'], created_psbt['fee'])
assert_equal(walletprocesspsbt_out['complete'], True)
self.nodes[1].sendrawtransaction(self.nodes[1].finalizepsbt(walletprocesspsbt_out['psbt'])['hex'])
# feeRate of 0.1 DASH / KB produces a total fee slightly below -maxtxfee (~0.06650000):
res = self.nodes[1].walletcreatefundedpsbt([{"txid":txid,"vout":p2pkh_pos},{"txid":txid,"vout":p2sh_pos},{"txid":txid,"vout":p2pkh_pos}], {self.nodes[1].getnewaddress():29.99}, 0, {"feeRate": 0.1}, False)
assert_greater_than(res["fee"], 0.06)
assert_greater_than(0.07, res["fee"])
decoded_psbt = self.nodes[0].decodepsbt(res['psbt'])
for psbt_in in decoded_psbt["inputs"]:
assert "bip32_derivs" not in psbt_in
# feeRate of 10 DASH / KB produces a total fee well above -maxtxfee
# previously this was silently capped at -maxtxfee
assert_raises_rpc_error(-4, "Fee exceeds maximum configured by user (e.g. -maxtxfee, maxfeerate)", self.nodes[1].walletcreatefundedpsbt, [{"txid":txid,"vout":p2pkh_pos},{"txid":txid,"vout":p2sh_pos},{"txid":txid,"vout":p2pkh_pos}], {self.nodes[1].getnewaddress():29.99}, 0, {"feeRate": 10})
# partially sign multisig things with node 1
psbtx = self.nodes[1].walletcreatefundedpsbt([{"txid":txid,"vout":p2sh_pos}], {self.nodes[1].getnewaddress():9.99})['psbt']
walletprocesspsbt_out = self.nodes[1].walletprocesspsbt(psbtx)
psbtx = walletprocesspsbt_out['psbt']
assert_equal(walletprocesspsbt_out['complete'], False)
# partially sign with node 2. This should be complete and sendable
walletprocesspsbt_out = self.nodes[2].walletprocesspsbt(psbtx)
assert_equal(walletprocesspsbt_out['complete'], True)
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(self.nodes[2].finalizepsbt(walletprocesspsbt_out['psbt'])['hex'])
# check that walletprocesspsbt fails to decode a non-psbt
rawtx = self.nodes[1].createrawtransaction([{"txid":txid,"vout":p2pkh_pos}], {self.nodes[1].getnewaddress():9.99})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-22, "TX decode failed", self.nodes[1].walletprocesspsbt, rawtx)
# Convert a non-psbt to psbt and make sure we can decode it
rawtx = self.nodes[0].createrawtransaction([], {self.nodes[1].getnewaddress():10})
rawtx = self.nodes[0].fundrawtransaction(rawtx)
new_psbt = self.nodes[0].converttopsbt(rawtx['hex'])
self.nodes[0].decodepsbt(new_psbt)
# Make sure that a psbt with signatures cannot be converted
signedtx = self.nodes[0].signrawtransactionwithwallet(rawtx['hex'])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-22, "Inputs must not have scriptSigs", self.nodes[0].converttopsbt, hexstring=signedtx['hex'])
assert_raises_rpc_error(-22, "Inputs must not have scriptSigs", self.nodes[0].converttopsbt, hexstring=signedtx['hex'], permitsigdata=False)
# Unless we allow it to convert and strip signatures
self.nodes[0].converttopsbt(signedtx['hex'], True)
# Explicitly allow converting non-empty txs
new_psbt = self.nodes[0].converttopsbt(rawtx['hex'])
self.nodes[0].decodepsbt(new_psbt)
# Create outputs to nodes 1 and 2
node1_addr = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
node2_addr = self.nodes[2].getnewaddress()
txid1 = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(node1_addr, 13)
txid2 = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(node2_addr, 13)
blockhash = self.nodes[0].generate(6)[0]
self.sync_all()
vout1 = find_output(self.nodes[1], txid1, 13, blockhash=blockhash)
vout2 = find_output(self.nodes[2], txid2, 13, blockhash=blockhash)
# Create a psbt spending outputs from nodes 1 and 2
psbt_orig = self.nodes[0].createpsbt([{"txid":txid1, "vout":vout1}, {"txid":txid2, "vout":vout2}], {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress():25.999})
# Update psbts, should only have data for one input and not the other
Merge #17264: rpc: set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost) 29a21c90610aed88b796a7a5900e42e9048b990e [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost) Pull request description: In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs: > _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`. > > Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in. In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet. More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index). ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17264/commits/5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 jonatack: ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests. meshcollider: utACK 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
2020-02-25 11:49:06 +01:00
psbt1 = self.nodes[1].walletprocesspsbt(psbt_orig, False, "ALL")['psbt']
psbt1_decoded = self.nodes[0].decodepsbt(psbt1)
assert psbt1_decoded['inputs'][0] and not psbt1_decoded['inputs'][1]
Merge #17264: rpc: set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost) 29a21c90610aed88b796a7a5900e42e9048b990e [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost) Pull request description: In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs: > _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`. > > Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in. In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet. More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index). ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17264/commits/5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 jonatack: ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests. meshcollider: utACK 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
2020-02-25 11:49:06 +01:00
# Check that BIP32 path was added
assert "bip32_derivs" in psbt1_decoded['inputs'][0]
psbt2 = self.nodes[2].walletprocesspsbt(psbt_orig, False, "ALL", False)['psbt']
psbt2_decoded = self.nodes[0].decodepsbt(psbt2)
assert not psbt2_decoded['inputs'][0] and psbt2_decoded['inputs'][1]
Merge #17264: rpc: set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost) 29a21c90610aed88b796a7a5900e42e9048b990e [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost) Pull request description: In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs: > _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`. > > Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in. In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet. More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index). ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: utACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17264/commits/5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 jonatack: ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests. meshcollider: utACK 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
2020-02-25 11:49:06 +01:00
# Check that BIP32 paths were not added
assert "bip32_derivs" not in psbt2_decoded['inputs'][1]
# Sign PSBTs (workaround issue #18039)
psbt1 = self.nodes[1].walletprocesspsbt(psbt_orig)['psbt']
psbt2 = self.nodes[2].walletprocesspsbt(psbt_orig)['psbt']
# Combine, finalize, and send the psbts
combined = self.nodes[0].combinepsbt([psbt1, psbt2])
finalized = self.nodes[0].finalizepsbt(combined)['hex']
self.nodes[0].sendrawtransaction(finalized)
self.nodes[0].generate(6)
self.sync_all()
# Make sure change address wallet does not have P2SH innerscript access to results in success
# when attempting BnB coin selection
block_height = self.nodes[0].getblockcount()
self.nodes[0].walletcreatefundedpsbt([], [{self.nodes[2].getnewaddress():self.nodes[0].listunspent()[0]["amount"]+1}], block_height+2, {"changeAddress":self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()}, False)
# Regression test for 14473 (mishandling of already-signed witness transaction):
unspent = self.nodes[0].listunspent()[0]
psbtx_info = self.nodes[0].walletcreatefundedpsbt([{"txid":unspent["txid"], "vout":unspent["vout"]}], [{self.nodes[2].getnewaddress():unspent["amount"]+1}])
complete_psbt = self.nodes[0].walletprocesspsbt(psbtx_info["psbt"])
double_processed_psbt = self.nodes[0].walletprocesspsbt(complete_psbt["psbt"])
assert_equal(complete_psbt, double_processed_psbt)
# We don't care about the decode result, but decoding must succeed.
self.nodes[0].decodepsbt(double_processed_psbt["psbt"])
# BIP 174 Test Vectors
# Check that unknown values are just passed through
unknown_psbt = "cHNidP8BAD8CAAAAAf//////////////////////////////////////////AAAAAAD/////AQAAAAAAAAAAA2oBAAAAAAAACg8BAgMEBQYHCAkPAQIDBAUGBwgJCgsMDQ4PAAA="
unknown_out = self.nodes[0].walletprocesspsbt(unknown_psbt)['psbt']
assert_equal(unknown_psbt, unknown_out)
# Open the data file
with open(os.path.join(os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath(__file__)), 'data/rpc_psbt.json'), encoding='utf-8') as f:
d = json.load(f)
invalids = d['invalid']
valids = d['valid']
creators = d['creator']
signers = d['signer']
combiners = d['combiner']
finalizers = d['finalizer']
extractors = d['extractor']
# Invalid PSBTs
for invalid in invalids:
assert_raises_rpc_error(-22, "TX decode failed", self.nodes[0].decodepsbt, invalid)
# Valid PSBTs
for valid in valids:
self.nodes[0].decodepsbt(valid)
# Creator Tests
for creator in creators:
created_tx = self.nodes[0].createpsbt(creator['inputs'], creator['outputs'])
assert_equal(created_tx, creator['result'])
# Signer tests
for i, signer in enumerate(signers):
2018-08-08 23:27:20 +02:00
self.nodes[2].createwallet("wallet{}".format(i))
wrpc = self.nodes[2].get_wallet_rpc("wallet{}".format(i))
for key in signer['privkeys']:
2018-08-08 23:27:20 +02:00
wrpc.importprivkey(key)
signed_tx = wrpc.walletprocesspsbt(signer['psbt'])['psbt']
assert_equal(signed_tx, signer['result'])
# Combiner test
for combiner in combiners:
combined = self.nodes[2].combinepsbt(combiner['combine'])
assert_equal(combined, combiner['result'])
# Empty combiner test
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "Parameter 'txs' cannot be empty", self.nodes[0].combinepsbt, [])
# Finalizer test
for finalizer in finalizers:
finalized = self.nodes[2].finalizepsbt(finalizer['finalize'], False)['psbt']
assert_equal(finalized, finalizer['result'])
# Extractor test
for extractor in extractors:
extracted = self.nodes[2].finalizepsbt(extractor['extract'], True)['hex']
assert_equal(extracted, extractor['result'])
# Test that psbts with p2pkh outputs are created properly
p2pkh = self.nodes[0].getnewaddress()
psbt = self.nodes[1].walletcreatefundedpsbt([], [{p2pkh : 1}], 0, {"includeWatching" : True}, True)
decoded_psbt = self.nodes[0].decodepsbt(psbtx)
for psbt_in in decoded_psbt["inputs"]:
assert "bip32_derivs" in psbt_in
# Test decoding error: invalid base64
assert_raises_rpc_error(-22, "TX decode failed invalid base64", self.nodes[0].decodepsbt, ";definitely not base64;")
# Send to all types of addresses
addr1 = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
txid1 = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(addr1, 11)
vout1 = find_output(self.nodes[0], txid1, 11)
addr2 = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
txid2 = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(addr2, 11)
vout2 = find_output(self.nodes[0], txid2, 11)
addr3 = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
txid3 = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(addr3, 11)
vout3 = find_output(self.nodes[0], txid3, 11)
self.sync_all()
Merge #15427: Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (#4656) 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille) 3135c1a2d2e2fb31bc362c848bd2456d576e408b Abstract out UpdatePSBTOutput from FillPSBT (Pieter Wuille) fb90ec3c33e824f5abb6a68452c683d6ce8b3e4a Abstract out EvalDescriptorStringOrObject from scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille) eaf4f887348a08c620732125ad4430e1a133d434 Abstract out IsSegWitOutput from utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: This adds a descriptors argument to the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC. This means: * Input and output scripts and keys will be filled in when known. * P2SH-witness inputs will be filled in from the UTXO set when a descriptor is provided that shows they're spending segwit outputs. This also moves some (newly) shared code to separate functions: `UpdatePSBTOutput` (an analogue to `SignPSBTInput`), `IsSegWitOutput`, and `EvalDescriptorStringOrObject` (implementing the string or object notation parsing used in `scantxoutset`). ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f laanwj: utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f (will hold merging until response to promag's comments) promag: ACK 26fe9b9, checked refactors and tests look comprehensive. Still missing a release note but can be added later. Tree-SHA512: 1d833b7351b59d6c5ded6da399ff371a8a2a6ad04c0a8f90e6e46105dc737fa6f2740b1e5340280d59e01f42896c40b720c042f44417e38dfbee6477b894b245 Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
2022-06-23 01:42:19 +02:00
def test_psbt_input_keys(psbt_input, keys):
"""Check that the psbt input has only the expected keys."""
assert_equal(set(keys), set(psbt_input.keys()))
# Create a PSBT. None of the inputs are filled initially
psbt = self.nodes[1].createpsbt([{"txid":txid1, "vout":vout1},{"txid":txid2, "vout":vout2},{"txid":txid3, "vout":vout3}], {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress():32.999})
decoded = self.nodes[1].decodepsbt(psbt)
Merge #15427: Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (#4656) 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille) 3135c1a2d2e2fb31bc362c848bd2456d576e408b Abstract out UpdatePSBTOutput from FillPSBT (Pieter Wuille) fb90ec3c33e824f5abb6a68452c683d6ce8b3e4a Abstract out EvalDescriptorStringOrObject from scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille) eaf4f887348a08c620732125ad4430e1a133d434 Abstract out IsSegWitOutput from utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: This adds a descriptors argument to the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC. This means: * Input and output scripts and keys will be filled in when known. * P2SH-witness inputs will be filled in from the UTXO set when a descriptor is provided that shows they're spending segwit outputs. This also moves some (newly) shared code to separate functions: `UpdatePSBTOutput` (an analogue to `SignPSBTInput`), `IsSegWitOutput`, and `EvalDescriptorStringOrObject` (implementing the string or object notation parsing used in `scantxoutset`). ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f laanwj: utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f (will hold merging until response to promag's comments) promag: ACK 26fe9b9, checked refactors and tests look comprehensive. Still missing a release note but can be added later. Tree-SHA512: 1d833b7351b59d6c5ded6da399ff371a8a2a6ad04c0a8f90e6e46105dc737fa6f2740b1e5340280d59e01f42896c40b720c042f44417e38dfbee6477b894b245 Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
2022-06-23 01:42:19 +02:00
test_psbt_input_keys(decoded['inputs'][0], [])
test_psbt_input_keys(decoded['inputs'][1], [])
test_psbt_input_keys(decoded['inputs'][2], [])
# Update a PSBT with UTXOs from the node
# No inputs should be filled because they are non-witness
updated = self.nodes[1].utxoupdatepsbt(psbt)
decoded = self.nodes[1].decodepsbt(updated)
Merge #15427: Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (#4656) 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille) 3135c1a2d2e2fb31bc362c848bd2456d576e408b Abstract out UpdatePSBTOutput from FillPSBT (Pieter Wuille) fb90ec3c33e824f5abb6a68452c683d6ce8b3e4a Abstract out EvalDescriptorStringOrObject from scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille) eaf4f887348a08c620732125ad4430e1a133d434 Abstract out IsSegWitOutput from utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: This adds a descriptors argument to the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC. This means: * Input and output scripts and keys will be filled in when known. * P2SH-witness inputs will be filled in from the UTXO set when a descriptor is provided that shows they're spending segwit outputs. This also moves some (newly) shared code to separate functions: `UpdatePSBTOutput` (an analogue to `SignPSBTInput`), `IsSegWitOutput`, and `EvalDescriptorStringOrObject` (implementing the string or object notation parsing used in `scantxoutset`). ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f laanwj: utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f (will hold merging until response to promag's comments) promag: ACK 26fe9b9, checked refactors and tests look comprehensive. Still missing a release note but can be added later. Tree-SHA512: 1d833b7351b59d6c5ded6da399ff371a8a2a6ad04c0a8f90e6e46105dc737fa6f2740b1e5340280d59e01f42896c40b720c042f44417e38dfbee6477b894b245 Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
2022-06-23 01:42:19 +02:00
test_psbt_input_keys(decoded['inputs'][1], [])
test_psbt_input_keys(decoded['inputs'][2], [])
# Try again, now while providing descriptors
descs = [self.nodes[1].getaddressinfo(addr)['desc'] for addr in [addr1,addr2,addr3]]
Merge #16326: [RPC] add new utxoupdatepsbt arguments to the CRPCCommand and CPRCCvertParam tables 91cc18f602fe2ff7fe47335a8e1e7734895a19d9 [docs] Add release notes for PR 15427 (John Newbery) 3b11420b3c91f731b03805a39e48ee32e54484a2 [RPC] add new utxoupdatepsbt arguments to the CRPCCommand and CPRCConvertParam tables (John Newbery) Pull request description: The new `descriptors` argument was not added to the CRPCCommand and CPRCCvertParam tables, meaning that it couldn't be used with bitcoin-cli or named arguments. Before this PR: ``` > bitcoin-cli utxoupdatepsbt 'cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==' "[{\"desc\":\"sh(wpkh([bd50871a/0h/0h/0h]03895c66337b38699bfafff1084ad35bc347fac4f4e5e5fe5eb7dd81155280db53))\"}]" error code: -3 error message: Expected type array, got string > bitcoin-cli --named utxoupdatepsbt psbt='cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==' descriptors="[{\"desc\":\"sh(wpkh([bd50871a/0h/0h/0h]03895c66337b38699bfafff1084ad35bc347fac4f4e5e5fe5eb7dd81155280db53))\"}]" error code: -8 error message: Unknown named parameter descriptors ``` After this PR: ``` bitcoin-cli utxoupdatepsbt 'cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==' "[{\"desc\":\"sh(wpkh([bd50871a/0h/0h/0h]03895c66337b38699bfafff1084ad35bc347fac4f4e5e5fe5eb7dd81155280db53))\"}]" cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA== bitcoin-cli --named utxoupdatepsbt psbt='cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==' descriptors="[{\"desc\":\"sh(wpkh([bd50871a/0h/0h/0h]03895c66337b38699bfafff1084ad35bc347fac4f4e5e5fe5eb7dd81155280db53))\"}]" cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA== ``` ACKs for top commit: promag: ACK 91cc18f. fanquake: re-ACK 91cc18f602fe2ff7fe47335a8e1e7734895a19d9 Tree-SHA512: 279b2339a5cac17e363002e4ab743e251d6757c904c89f1970575bdce18d4f63d5e13507e171bf2bdc1bf6dd457db345a4b11b15d4ff71b96c2fedc4ffe52b23
2019-07-07 03:36:23 +02:00
updated = self.nodes[1].utxoupdatepsbt(psbt=psbt, descriptors=descs)
Merge #15427: Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (#4656) 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille) 3135c1a2d2e2fb31bc362c848bd2456d576e408b Abstract out UpdatePSBTOutput from FillPSBT (Pieter Wuille) fb90ec3c33e824f5abb6a68452c683d6ce8b3e4a Abstract out EvalDescriptorStringOrObject from scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille) eaf4f887348a08c620732125ad4430e1a133d434 Abstract out IsSegWitOutput from utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille) Pull request description: This adds a descriptors argument to the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC. This means: * Input and output scripts and keys will be filled in when known. * P2SH-witness inputs will be filled in from the UTXO set when a descriptor is provided that shows they're spending segwit outputs. This also moves some (newly) shared code to separate functions: `UpdatePSBTOutput` (an analogue to `SignPSBTInput`), `IsSegWitOutput`, and `EvalDescriptorStringOrObject` (implementing the string or object notation parsing used in `scantxoutset`). ACKs for top commit: jnewbery: utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f laanwj: utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f (will hold merging until response to promag's comments) promag: ACK 26fe9b9, checked refactors and tests look comprehensive. Still missing a release note but can be added later. Tree-SHA512: 1d833b7351b59d6c5ded6da399ff371a8a2a6ad04c0a8f90e6e46105dc737fa6f2740b1e5340280d59e01f42896c40b720c042f44417e38dfbee6477b894b245 Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
2022-06-23 01:42:19 +02:00
decoded = self.nodes[1].decodepsbt(updated)
test_psbt_input_keys(decoded['inputs'][0], [])
test_psbt_input_keys(decoded['inputs'][1], [])
test_psbt_input_keys(decoded['inputs'][2], [])
# Two PSBTs with a common input should not be joinable
psbt1 = self.nodes[1].createpsbt([{"txid":txid1, "vout":vout1}], {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress():Decimal('10.999')})
assert_raises_rpc_error(-8, "exists in multiple PSBTs", self.nodes[1].joinpsbts, [psbt1, updated])
# Join two distinct PSBTs
addr4 = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
txid4 = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(addr4, 5)
vout4 = find_output(self.nodes[0], txid4, 5)
self.nodes[0].generate(6)
self.sync_all()
psbt2 = self.nodes[1].createpsbt([{"txid":txid4, "vout":vout4}], {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress():Decimal('4.999')})
psbt2 = self.nodes[1].walletprocesspsbt(psbt2)['psbt']
psbt2_decoded = self.nodes[0].decodepsbt(psbt2)
assert "final_scriptwitness" not in psbt2_decoded['inputs'][0] and "final_scriptSig" in psbt2_decoded['inputs'][0]
joined = self.nodes[0].joinpsbts([psbt, psbt2])
joined_decoded = self.nodes[0].decodepsbt(joined)
assert len(joined_decoded['inputs']) == 4 and len(joined_decoded['outputs']) == 2 and "final_scriptwitness" not in joined_decoded['inputs'][3] and "final_scriptSig" not in joined_decoded['inputs'][3]
# Newly created PSBT needs UTXOs and updating
addr = self.nodes[1].getnewaddress()
txid = self.nodes[0].sendtoaddress(addr, 7)
self.nodes[0].generate(6)
self.sync_all()
vout = find_output(self.nodes[0], txid, 7)
psbt = self.nodes[1].createpsbt([{"txid":txid, "vout":vout}], {self.nodes[0].getnewaddress():Decimal('6.999')})
analyzed = self.nodes[0].analyzepsbt(psbt)
assert not analyzed['inputs'][0]['has_utxo'] and not analyzed['inputs'][0]['is_final'] and analyzed['inputs'][0]['next'] == 'updater' and analyzed['next'] == 'updater'
# After update with wallet, only needs signing
updated = self.nodes[1].walletprocesspsbt(psbt, False, 'ALL', True)['psbt']
analyzed = self.nodes[0].analyzepsbt(updated)
assert analyzed['inputs'][0]['has_utxo'] and not analyzed['inputs'][0]['is_final'] and analyzed['inputs'][0]['next'] == 'signer' and analyzed['next'] == 'signer'
# Check fee and size things
assert analyzed['fee'] == Decimal('0.00100000') and analyzed['estimated_vsize'] == 191 and analyzed['estimated_feerate'] == Decimal('0.00523560')
# After signing and finalizing, needs extracting
signed = self.nodes[1].walletprocesspsbt(updated)['psbt']
analyzed = self.nodes[0].analyzepsbt(signed)
assert analyzed['inputs'][0]['has_utxo'] and analyzed['inputs'][0]['is_final'] and analyzed['next'] == 'extractor'
self.log.info("PSBT spending unspendable outputs should have error message and Creator as next")
analysis = self.nodes[0].analyzepsbt('cHNidP8BAHECAAAAAQLlOzD0IqyxBs+IP6PTQ4NpMkMfJwUtvZ2MEr9+u0PtAAAAAAD/////AgD5ApUAAAAAFgAUKNw0x8HRctAgmvoevm4u1SbN7XL87QKVAAAAABYAFPck4gF7iL4NL4wtfRAKgQbghiTUAAAAAAABABUCAAAAAAGghgEAAAAAAAJqAAAAAAABAR8AgIFq49AHABYAFJUDtxf2PHo641HEOBOAIvFMNTr2AAAA')
assert_equal(analysis['next'], 'creator')
assert_equal(analysis['error'], 'PSBT is not valid. Input 0 spends unspendable output')
self.log.info("PSBT with invalid values should have error message and Creator as next")
analysis = self.nodes[0].analyzepsbt('cHNidP8BAHECAAAAAQXbPuwX0yi0oRvSfIXqeruM5+ibuXvP92RCdIEsJR6jAAAAAAD/////AgD5ApUAAAAAFgAUKNw0x8HRctAgmvoevm4u1SbN7XL87QKVAAAAABYAFPck4gF7iL4NL4wtfRAKgQbghiTUAAAAAAABABMCAAAAAAEBQAda8HUHAAAAAAAAAQcCagABAR8AgIFq49AHABYAFJUDtxf2PHo641HEOBOAIvFMNTr2AAAA')
assert_equal(analysis['next'], 'creator')
assert_equal(analysis['error'], 'PSBT is not valid. Input 0 has invalid value')
self.log.info("PSBT with signed, but not finalized, inputs should have Finalizer as next")
analysis = self.nodes[0].analyzepsbt('cHNidP8BAHECAAAAAXfx5nfVEBDq0BbpUjqqfvNEWyX2dGCkx7RiW9E6DXPbAAAAAAD9////AlDDAAAAAAAAFgAUy/UxxZuzZswcmFnN/E9DGSiHLUsuGPUFAAAAABYAFLsH5o0R38wXx+X2cCosTMCZnQ4baAAAAAABACwCAAAAAAEA4fUFAAAAABl2qRTgSNoebYX9/i35W9ixgrFUmcLJbYisAAAAACICAv4uHbVQEQkVrUThtBx6BnGlZJcyVHMKOYaJoBpEjQJyRzBEAiBse8ynDCBq+3BBEvQUeCnbf6cz0yt3ylnBsgiV2+zFZwIgCzgYKpTB+BmwtRw4fx5spZjueH8hMuJSnXu/wU/z1scBAQMEAQAAACIGAv4uHbVQEQkVrUThtBx6BnGlZJcyVHMKOYaJoBpEjQJyGA8FaUNUAACAAQAAgAAAAIAAAAAAAAAAAAEBHwDh9QUAAAAAFgAU4EjaHm2F/f4t+VvYsYKxVJnCyW0AACICAv4IiIHn01IKyw4lEaIxhArVyFqGABpomkhcTjULKKv7GA8FaUNUAACAAQAAgAAAAIABAAAAAAAAAAA=')
# TODO update tx above.
# currently I can't figure out how to generate transaction, that would be valid and will show correct stage finalizer.
# currently it fails at `verify pubkey` for signer
# assert_equal(analysis['next'], 'finalizer')
analysis = self.nodes[0].analyzepsbt('cHNidP8BAHECAAAAAbmNr2X0Nc+2AtaXYjPu3kIFc3Cmj1aYy5WQs5yaUfRvAAAAAAD/////AgCAgWrj0AcAFgAUKNw0x8HRctAgmvoevm4u1SbN7XL87QKVAAAAABYAFPck4gF7iL4NL4wtfRAKgQbghiTUAAAAAAABABQCAAAAAAGghgEAAAAAAAFRAAAAAAEBHwDyBSoBAAAAFgAUlQO3F/Y8ejrjUcQ4E4Ai8Uw1OvYAAAA=')
assert_equal(analysis['next'], 'creator')
assert_equal(analysis['error'], 'PSBT is not valid. Output amount invalid')
analysis = self.nodes[0].analyzepsbt('cHNidP8BAJoCAAAAAkvEW8NnDtdNtDpsmze+Ht2LH35IJcKv00jKAlUs21RrAwAAAAD/////S8Rbw2cO1020OmybN74e3Ysffkglwq/TSMoCVSzbVGsBAAAAAP7///8CwLYClQAAAAAWABSNJKzjaUb3uOxixsvh1GGE3fW7zQD5ApUAAAAAFgAUKNw0x8HRctAgmvoevm4u1SbN7XIAAAAAAAEAnQIAAAACczMa321tVHuN4GKWKRncycI22aX3uXgwSFUKM2orjRsBAAAAAP7///9zMxrfbW1Ue43gYpYpGdzJwjbZpfe5eDBIVQozaiuNGwAAAAAA/v///wIA+QKVAAAAABl2qRT9zXUVA8Ls5iVqynLHe5/vSe1XyYisQM0ClQAAAAAWABRmWQUcjSjghQ8/uH4Bn/zkakwLtAAAAAAAAQEfQM0ClQAAAAAWABRmWQUcjSjghQ8/uH4Bn/zkakwLtAAAAA==')
assert_equal(analysis['next'], 'creator')
assert_equal(analysis['error'], 'PSBT is not valid. Input 0 specifies invalid prevout')
partial Merge #18027: "PSBT Operations" dialog BACKPORT NOTICE fixup psbt. all missing changes belongs to src/wallet/scriptpubkeyman.h/cpp ----- they are related to descriptor wallet! ------------------- 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 Make lint-spelling.py happy (Glenn Willen) 11a0ffb29d1b4dcc55c8826873f340ab4196af21 [gui] Load PSBT from clipboard (Glenn Willen) a6cb0b0c29d327d01aebb98b0504f317eb19c3dc [gui] PSBT Operations Dialog (sign & broadcast) (Glenn Willen) 5dd0c03ffa3aeaa69d8a3a716f902f450d5eaaec FillPSBT: report number of inputs signed (or would sign) (Glenn Willen) 9e7b23b73387600d175aff8bd5e6624dd51f86e7 Improve TransactionErrorString messages. (Glenn Willen) Pull request description: Add a "PSBT Operations" dialog, reached from the "Load PSBT..." menu item, giving options to sign or broadcast the loaded PSBT as appropriate, as well as copying the result to the clipboard or saving it to a file. This is based on Sjors' #17509, and depends on that PR going in first. (It effectively replaces the small "load PSBT" dialog from that PR with a more feature-rich one.) Some notes: * The way I display status information is maybe unusual (a status bar, rather than messageboxes.) I think it's helpful to have the information in it be persistent rather than transitory. But if people dislike it, I would probably move the "current state of the transaction" info to the top line of the main label, and the "what action just happened, and did it succeed" info into a messagebox. * I don't really know much about the translation/localization stuff. I put tr() in all the places it seemed like it ought to go. I did not attempt to translate the result of TransactionErrorString (which is shared by GUI and non-GUI code); I don't know if that's correct, but it matches the "error messages in logs should be googleable in English" heuristic. I don't know whether there are things I should be doing to reduce translator effort (like minimizing the total number of distinct message strings I use, or something.) * I don't really know how (if?) automated testing is applied to GUI code. I can make a list of PSBTs exercising all the codepaths for manual testing, if that's the right approach. Input appreciated. ACKs for top commit: instagibbs: tested ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18027/commits/931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 Sjors: re-tACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 jb55: ACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 achow101: ACK 931dd4760855e036c176a23ec2de367c460e4243 Tree-SHA512: ade52471a2242f839a8bd6a1fd231443cc4b43bb9c1de3fb5ace7c5eb59eca99b1f2e9f17dfdb4b08d84d91f5fd65677db1433dd03eef51c7774963ef4e2e74f
2020-06-21 12:56:58 +02:00
assert_raises_rpc_error(-25, 'Inputs missing or spent', self.nodes[0].walletprocesspsbt, 'cHNidP8BAJoCAAAAAkvEW8NnDtdNtDpsmze+Ht2LH35IJcKv00jKAlUs21RrAwAAAAD/////S8Rbw2cO1020OmybN74e3Ysffkglwq/TSMoCVSzbVGsBAAAAAP7///8CwLYClQAAAAAWABSNJKzjaUb3uOxixsvh1GGE3fW7zQD5ApUAAAAAFgAUKNw0x8HRctAgmvoevm4u1SbN7XIAAAAAAAEAnQIAAAACczMa321tVHuN4GKWKRncycI22aX3uXgwSFUKM2orjRsBAAAAAP7///9zMxrfbW1Ue43gYpYpGdzJwjbZpfe5eDBIVQozaiuNGwAAAAAA/v///wIA+QKVAAAAABl2qRT9zXUVA8Ls5iVqynLHe5/vSe1XyYisQM0ClQAAAAAWABRmWQUcjSjghQ8/uH4Bn/zkakwLtAAAAAAAAQEfQM0ClQAAAAAWABRmWQUcjSjghQ8/uH4Bn/zkakwLtAAAAA==')
if __name__ == '__main__':
PSBTTest().main()