sikkienl/dash
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/dashpay/dash.git synced 2024-12-26 12:32:48 +01:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Send transactions after a CMerkleBlock when asked for it in an inv.

Browse Source 
This actually simplifies some SPV code, as they can keep track of
a filtered block and its txn before accepting both in one step.
The previous argument was that SPV nodes should handle the txn the
same as any other free txn and then mark them as connected to a
block when they get the filtered block itself.  However, it now
appears that SPV nodes will need to put in more effort to verify
loose txn than they would to verify txn in blocks, thus making it
more approriate to send the txn after the filtered block.
This commit is contained in:
Matt Corallo 2013-01-18 12:16:39 -05:00
parent 2c7847349d
commit 28b80e6065
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
src/main.cpp
View File

@ -3267,6 +3267,7 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv)
if (pfrom->pfilter)
{
CMerkleBlock merkleBlock(block, *pfrom->pfilter);
pfrom->PushMessage("merkleblock", merkleBlock);
// CMerkleBlock just contains hashes, so also push any transactions in the block the client did not see
// This avoids hurting performance by pointlessly requiring a round-trip
// Note that there is currently no way for a node to request any single transactions we didnt send here -
@ -3277,7 +3278,6 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv)
BOOST_FOREACH(PairType& pair, merkleBlock.vMatchedTxn)
if (!pfrom->setInventoryKnown.count(CInv(MSG_TX, pair.second)))
pfrom->PushMessage("tx", block.vtx[pair.first]);
pfrom->PushMessage("merkleblock", merkleBlock);
}
// else
// no response