Dash - Reinventing Cryptocurrency
Go to file
Matt Corallo 28b80e6065 Send transactions after a CMerkleBlock when asked for it in an inv.
This actually simplifies some SPV code, as they can keep track of
a filtered block and its txn before accepting both in one step.
The previous argument was that SPV nodes should handle the txn the
same as any other free txn and then mark them as connected to a
block when they get the filtered block itself.  However, it now
appears that SPV nodes will need to put in more effort to verify
loose txn than they would to verify txn in blocks, thus making it
more approriate to send the txn after the filtered block.
2013-01-18 12:16:39 -05:00
contrib Deploy properly with Nokia Qt installer's Frameworks 2012-11-21 19:38:56 +00:00
doc Merge pull request #2064 from petertodd/ipv6-doc-polarity 2012-12-12 09:23:55 -08:00
share Update version numbers to 0.7.99 2012-10-21 12:10:08 +02:00
src Send transactions after a CMerkleBlock when asked for it in an inv. 2013-01-18 12:16:39 -05:00
.gitattributes Build identification strings 2012-04-10 18:16:53 +02:00
.gitignore Import LevelDB 1.5, it will be used for the transaction database. 2012-10-20 23:08:56 +02:00
bitcoin-qt.pro Merge pull request #2060 from sipa/parallel 2013-01-17 16:58:58 -08:00
COPYING Update all copyrights to 2012 2012-02-07 11:28:30 -05:00
INSTALL Update master 2012-06-21 09:36:20 +08:00
README directory re-organization (keeps the old build system) 2011-04-23 12:10:25 +02:00
README.md Update development process README to reflect current reality 2013-01-14 14:31:10 -05:00

Bitcoin integration/staging tree

Development process

Developers work in their own trees, then submit pull requests when they think their feature or bug fix is ready.

If it is a simple/trivial/non-controversial change, then one of the bitcoin development team members simply pulls it.

If it is a more complicated or potentially controversial change, then the patch submitter will be asked to start a discussion (if they haven't already) on the mailing list: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development

The patch will be accepted if there is broad consensus that it is a good thing. Developers should expect to rework and resubmit patches if they don't match the project's coding conventions (see coding.txt) or are controversial.

The master branch is regularly built and tested, but is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are regularly created to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test. Please be patient and help out, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code.

Unit tests for the core code are in src/test/ To compile and run them: cd src; make -f makefile.linux test

Unit tests for the GUI code are in src/qt/test/ To compile and run them: qmake BITCOIN_QT_TEST=1 -o Makefile.test bitcoin-qt.pro make -f Makefile.test ./Bitcoin-Qt

Every pull request is built for both Windows and Linux on a dedicated server, and unit and sanity tests are automatically run. The binaries produced may be used for manual QA testing (a link to them will appear in a comment on the pull request from 'BitcoinPullTester'). See https://github.com/TheBlueMatt/test-scripts for the build/test scripts.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Large changes should have a test plan, and should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code.

See https://github.com/bitcoin/QA/ for how to create a test plan.