eca56f89293b74f11ca631ff2a0793e970e65841 test: replace 'regtest' leftovers by self.chain (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up PR to #16681 (fixes#18068), replacing all remaining hardcoded `"regtest"` strings in functional tests by `self.chain`.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 96524649b33164938e5a95215991103ed7855ebab55ef788d4816b3fa5cbc03d8f3b0d39f2247a87522f289fd7f4daf25e059900b8462b5127eb154bbee89054
1c23ea5fe67b88fd72a1ff640dd1bbb21a34fbf4 test: fix bitcoind already running warnings on macOS (fanquake)
Pull request description:
On macOS, `pidof` installed via brew returns b'' rather than None.
Account for this, to remove spurious warnings from the test_runner.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 1c23ea5fe67b88fd72a1ff640dd1bbb21a34fbf4
Tree-SHA512: 640f4323d4105eac5c7abb52daf80486d5d3b4a074720490ceeb97c3dd8d73a3de9a988d2550f1e2076c620bb10d452b2959d8b723d2ee64f499878909824e31
fac942ca57dce6cfa5655a3ac8664d6a051bc01f test: Remove fragile assert_memory_usage_stable (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This test fails on arm64 and a fuzz tests seems inappropriate for the functional test suite anyway, so remove it.
Example failures:
* https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/611497963#L14517
* https://travis-ci.org/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/jobs/611029104#L3876
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK fac942ca57
Tree-SHA512: 3577e7ce5891d221cb798454589ba796ed0c06621a26351bb919c23bc6bb46aafcd0b11cb02bbfde64b74d67cb2950da44959a7ecdc436491a34e8b045c1ccf4
49997813a4db388b2810e5e27ef771e8aa6a1f03 test: check custom ancestor limit in mempool_packages.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The functional test `mempool_packages.py` starts one node with default ancestor/descendant limit settings and one with a custom, reduced ancestor limit (currently `-limitancestorcount=5`). The effect of the latter had not been tested yet though. This is approached in this PR by checking on the expected mempool contents of node1 after the node0 ancestor tests are done, via the following three conditions:
- the # of txs in the node1 mempool is equal to the the limit
- all txs in node1 mempool are a subset of txs in node0 mempool
- the node1 mempool txs match the start of the constructed tx-chain
Note that this still doesn't *fully* check the expected mempool of node1 (e.g. that it isn't influenced by `prioritisetransaction` RPC on node0), hence I add another TODO. In the future it would make sense to also set a custom descendant limit when the second TODO about checking node1's mempool is approached: 89e93135ae/test/functional/mempool_packages.py (L228)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 49997813a4db388b2810e5e27ef771e8aa6a1f03 👲
Tree-SHA512: d3a1d19fb49731238ad08ee7c02e2fa81a227e3b4ef3340d68598de42ddb62be9161134f6b8e08fa76b8c9faa02fecfa01111159642e20e9f358292a757b7608
af7bae734089f6af0029b0887932ccd9a469e12e [tests] Don't stop-start unnecessarily in rpc_fundrawtransaction.py (John Newbery)
9a8505299ba392acbab4647963113b0c29495f1d [tests] Use -whitelist in rpc_fundrawtransaction.py (John Newbery)
646b593bbd0db113c6e45ab92177b8f5251e8710 [tests] Speed up rpc_fundrawtransaction.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Speed up rpc_fundrawtransaction.py
Most of the time in rpc_fundrawtransaction.py is spent waiting for
unconfirmed transactions to propagate. Net processing adds a poisson
random delay to the time it will INV transactions with a mean interval
of 5 seconds. Calls like the following:
```
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(signedTx['hex'])
self.sync_all()
self.nodes[1].generate(1)
````
will therefore introduce a delay waiting for the mempools to sync.
Instead just generate the block on the node that sent the transaction:
```
self.nodes[2].sendrawtransaction(signedTx['hex'])
self.nodes[2].generate(1)
```
rpc_fundrawtransaction.py is not intended to be a test for transaction
relay, so it's ok to do this.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK af7bae734089f6af0029b0887932ccd9a469e12e 🛴
Tree-SHA512: db3407d871bfdc99a02e7304b07239dd3585ac47f27f020f1a70608b7f6386b134343c01f3e4d1c246ce734676755897671999695068d6388602fb042d178780
436ad436434b94982bcb7dc1d13a21949263ef73 Fix issue with conflicted mempool tx in listsinceblock (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
Closes#8752 by bringing back abandoned #10470.
This now checks that returned transactions are not conflicting with any transactions that are filtered out by the given blockhash and add a functional test to prevent this in the future.
For more context, #8757 was closed in favor of #10470.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 436ad43643
kallewoof:
utACK 436ad436434b94982bcb7dc1d13a21949263ef73
jonatack:
I'm not qualifed to give an ACK here but 436ad436434b94982bcb7dc1d13a21949263ef73 appears reasonable. Built/ran tests/verified that this test fails without the change in rpcwallet.cpp:
Tree-SHA512: 63d75cd3d3f19fc84dc38899b200c96179b82b24db263cd0116ee5b715265be647157855c2e35912d2fbc49c7b37db9375d6aab0ac672f0f09bece8431de5ea9
72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9 tests: functional watch-only wallet tests (William Casarin)
72ffbdc5799c1707ecad674d701b43fb80b031d0 doc: add release note for include_watchonly default changes (William Casarin)
003a3c73c0450aa18ac2ab2ca47def2b8c53a7df rpcwallet: document include_watchonly default for watchonly wallets (William Casarin)
a50d9e6c0b8e8144d3deec58ec2e3449ba081151 rpcwallet: default include_watchonly to true for watchonly wallets (William Casarin)
Pull request description:
Right now it's a bit annoying to deal with watchonly wallets, many rpc commands have an `include_watchonly` argument that needs to be explicitly set.
Wallets created with `createwallet` can have a `disable_private_keys` parameter, for those wallets we already know that they are watchonly, so there's no reason to have to explicitly ask for it for every command. Instead we check this wallet flag when the `include_watchonly` parameter isn't set.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code review ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9
Sjors:
ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9
promag:
ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9, code review only, didn't look closely to the test.
kallewoof:
ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9
fanquake:
ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9 - I've looked over the changes, they make sense to me. Compiled and ran the tests etc.
Tree-SHA512: d3646b55e97f386594d7efc994f0712f3888475c6a5dc7f131ac9f8c49bf5d4677182b88f42b34152abe1ad101ecadd152b4c20e9d3c1267190db36f77ab8bd7
* fix(llmq): Ensure connections between quorums
Every masternode will now "watch" a single node from _every other_ quorum in addition to intra-quorum connections. This should make propagation of recsigs produced by one quorum to other quorums much more reliable.
* fix: Do this only for masternodes which participate in IS quorums
* refactor: rename `CQuorumManager::EnsureQuorumConnections` to better match the actual behaviour
(and avoid confusion with `CLLMQUtils::EnsureQuorumConnections`)
* refactor: move IS quorums watch logic into `CQuorumManager::CheckQuorumConnections`
avoid calling slow `ScanQuorums` (no caching atm) inside the loop
* tests: check that inter-quorum connections are added
* use `ranges::any_of`
* fix(llmq): mark mns "bad" based on the failed connect attempts count
Avoid using "last success time" as a proxy
* fix(tests): tweak feature_llmq_simplepose.py
0ea5d70b4756f376342417e0019490233cb4a918 Updated comment for the condition where a transaction relay is denied (glowang)
be01449cc8eb7bb97531a967f5d1dcc7b8865d1e Add test for param interaction b/w -blocksonly and -whitelistforcerelay (glowang)
Pull request description:
Related to: #18428
When -blocksonly is turned on, a node would still relay transactions from whitelisted peers. This funcitonality has not been tested.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0ea5d70b4756f376342417e0019490233cb4a918
Tree-SHA512: 4e99c88281cb518cc67f5f3be7171a7b413933047b5d24a04bb3ff2210a82e914d69079f64cd5bac9206ec435e21a622c8e69cedbc2ccb39d2328ac5c01668e5
26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille)
3135c1a2d2e2fb31bc362c848bd2456d576e408b Abstract out UpdatePSBTOutput from FillPSBT (Pieter Wuille)
fb90ec3c33e824f5abb6a68452c683d6ce8b3e4a Abstract out EvalDescriptorStringOrObject from scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille)
eaf4f887348a08c620732125ad4430e1a133d434 Abstract out IsSegWitOutput from utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This adds a descriptors argument to the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC. This means:
* Input and output scripts and keys will be filled in when known.
* P2SH-witness inputs will be filled in from the UTXO set when a descriptor is provided that shows they're spending segwit outputs.
This also moves some (newly) shared code to separate functions: `UpdatePSBTOutput` (an analogue to `SignPSBTInput`), `IsSegWitOutput`, and `EvalDescriptorStringOrObject` (implementing the string or object notation parsing used in `scantxoutset`).
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f
laanwj:
utACK 26fe9b990995f9cb5eee21d40b4daaad19f7181f (will hold merging until response to promag's comments)
promag:
ACK 26fe9b9, checked refactors and tests look comprehensive. Still missing a release note but can be added later.
Tree-SHA512: 1d833b7351b59d6c5ded6da399ff371a8a2a6ad04c0a8f90e6e46105dc737fa6f2740b1e5340280d59e01f42896c40b720c042f44417e38dfbee6477b894b245
Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
* Remove unused variable
* [refactor] Move tx relay state to separate structure
* [refactor] Change tx_relay structure to be unique_ptr
* Check that tx_relay is initialized before access
* Add comment explaining intended use of m_tx_relay
* Add 2 outbound block-relay-only connections
Transaction relay is primarily optimized for balancing redundancy/robustness
with bandwidth minimization -- as a result transaction relay leaks information
that adversaries can use to infer the network topology.
Network topology is better kept private for (at least) two reasons:
(a) Knowledge of the network graph can make it easier to find the source IP of
a given transaction.
(b) Knowledge of the network graph could be used to split a target node or
nodes from the honest network (eg by knowing which peers to attack in order to
achieve a network split).
We can eliminate the risks of (b) by separating block relay from transaction
relay; inferring network connectivity from the relay of blocks/block headers is
much more expensive for an adversary.
After this commit, bitcoind will make 2 additional outbound connections that
are only used for block relay. (In the future, we might consider rotating our
transaction-relay peers to help limit the effects of (a).)
* Don't relay addr messages to block-relay-only peers
We don't want relay of addr messages to leak information about
these network links.
* doc: improve comments relating to block-relay-only peers
* Disconnect peers violating blocks-only mode
If we set fRelay=false in our VERSION message, and a peer sends an INV or TX
message anyway, disconnect. Since we use fRelay=false to minimize bandwidth,
we should not tolerate remaining connected to a peer violating the protocol.
* net_processing. Removed comment + fixed formatting
* Refactoring net_processing, removed duplicated code
* Refactor some bool in a many-arguments function to enum
It's made to avoid possible typos with arguments, because some of them have default values and it's very high probability to make a mistake here.
* Added UI debug option for Outbound
* Fixed data race related to `setInventoryTxToSend`, introduced in `[refactor] Move tx relay state to separate structure`
Co-authored-by: Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
0e7c90eb37a687158c261ddd1ff9f1028a1e7012 test: speed up wallet_avoidreuse.py (Jon Atack)
6d50b2606ea9249627556051637080c3587b1b04 test: add logging to wallet_avoidreuse.py (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Inspired by PRs #17340 and #15881.
- add logging
- pass -whitelist in `set_test_params` to speed up transaction relay
`wallet_avoidreuse.py` is not intended to test P2P transaction relay/timing, so it should be fine to do this here. This reduces test run time variability and speeds up the test by 2-3 times on average.
Test run times in seconds:
- before: 20, 24, 22, 17, 27, 40, 30
- after: 10, 10, 8, 9, 10, 7, 8
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 0e7c90eb37a687158c261ddd1ff9f1028a1e7012 🐊
fanquake:
ACK 0e7c90eb37a687158c261ddd1ff9f1028a1e7012
Tree-SHA512: 6d954a0aaf402c9594201626b59d29263479059e68fa5155bb44ed973cd0c3347729dd78b78b4d5a2275e45da365dc1afb4cc7e3293dea33fcc2e3e83a39faf5
5ebc6b0eb267e0552c66fffc5e5afe7df8becf80 bitcoind: update -avoidpartialspends description to account for auto-enable for avoid_reuse wallets (Karl-Johan Alm)
ada258f8c8f92d44d893cf9f22d15acdeca40b1a doc: release notes for avoid_reuse (Karl-Johan Alm)
27669551da52099e4a6a401acd7aa32b32832423 wallet: enable avoid_partial_spends by default if avoid_reuse is set (Karl-Johan Alm)
8f2e208f7c0468f9ba92bc789a698281b1c81284 test: add test for avoidreuse feature (Karl-Johan Alm)
0bdfbd34cf4015de87741ff549db35e5064f4e16 wallet/rpc: add 'avoid_reuse' option to RPC commands (Karl-Johan Alm)
f904723e0d5883309cb0dd14b826bc45c5e776fb wallet/rpc: add setwalletflag RPC and MUTABLE_WALLET_FLAGS (Karl-Johan Alm)
8247a0da3a46d7c38943ee0304343ab7465305bd wallet: enable avoid_reuse feature (Karl-Johan Alm)
eec15662fad917b169f5e3b8baaf4301dcf00a7b wallet: avoid reuse flags (Karl-Johan Alm)
58928098c299efdc7c5ddf2dc20716ca5272f21b wallet: make IsWalletFlagSet() const (Karl-Johan Alm)
129a5bafd9a3efa2fa16d780885048a06566d262 wallet: rename g_known_wallet_flags constant to KNOWN_WALLET_FLAGS (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
Add a new wallet flag called `avoid_reuse` which, when enabled, will keep track of when a specific destination has been spent from, and will actively "blacklist" any new UTXOs which send to an already-spent-from destination.
This improves privacy, as a payer could otherwise begin tracking a payee's wallet by regularly peppering a known UTXO with dust outputs, which would then be scooped up and used in payments by the payee, allowing the payer to map out (1) the inputs owned by the payee and (2) the destinations to which the payee is making payments.
This replaces #10386 and together with the (now merged) #12257 it addresses #10065 in full. The concerns raised in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10386#issuecomment-302361381 are also addressed due to #12257.
~~Note: this builds on top of #15780.~~ (merged)
ACKs for commit 5ebc6b:
jnewbery:
ACK 5ebc6b0eb
laanwj:
Concept and code-review ACK 5ebc6b0eb267e0552c66fffc5e5afe7df8becf80
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 5ebc6b0eb2
achow101:
ACK 5ebc6b0eb267e0552c66fffc5e5afe7df8becf80 modulo above nits
Tree-SHA512: fdef45826af544cbbb45634ac367852cc467ec87081d86d08b53ca849e588617e9a0a255b7e7bb28692d15332de58d6c3d274ac003355220e4213d7d9070742e
aa410c2b17 rpc: Validate maxfeerate with AmountFromValue (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
With this change `maxfeerate` can also be set as a string, accordingly to the help test:
```
maxfeerate (numeric or string,
```
Beside, there are no tests for the removed errors.
ACKs for commit aa410c:
meshcollider:
utACK aa410c2b17
MarcoFalke:
utACK aa410c2b17 Good catch
Tree-SHA512: f3bfea91dc7daa943729e270585dbf333055aeda805fbd01eaab20a7e0e6147382647c11525334382d198df0d3d45da6102b541efda5a1361f96271c98d5d89d
90df92206cfce4e61eff9d584112643512f6b91c test: Change filemode of rpc_whitelist.py (Emil Engler)
Pull request description:
All python tests have the file mode `755`.
Probably due to a mistake `rpc_whitelist.py` is the only test with the permission `644`.
This PR makes it coherent with the other tests and updates it to `755` as well.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 90df92206cfce4e61eff9d584112643512f6b91c -- all tests should be executable
Tree-SHA512: b9e69cb5184a3bbee4c7b14ac35985145a9fd3403d0e449d79f15c18e9660cafec495d639f5f730e0c69dde5f4a3d7590b4e42d385e794cd02add1f4e3b785e7
2081442c421cc4376e5d7839f68fbe7630e89103 test: Add test for rpc_whitelist (Emil Engler)
7414d3820c833566b4f48c6c120a18bf53978c55 Add RPC Whitelist Feature from #12248 (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Summary
====
This patch adds the RPC whitelisting feature requested in #12248. RPC Whitelists help enforce application policies for services being built on top of Bitcoin Core (e.g., your Lightning Node maybe shouldn't be adding new peers). The aim of this PR is not to make it advisable to connect your Bitcoin node to arbitrary services, but to reduce risk and prevent unintended access.
Using RPC Whitelists
====
The way it works is you specify (in your bitcoin.conf) configurations such as
```
rpcauth=user1:4cc74397d6e9972e5ee7671fd241$11849357f26a5be7809c68a032bc2b16ab5dcf6348ef3ed1cf30dae47b8bcc71
rpcauth=user2:181b4a25317bff60f3749adee7d6bca0$d9c331474f1322975fa170a2ffbcb176ba11644211746b27c1d317f265dd4ada
rpcauth=user3:a6c8a511b53b1edcf69c36984985e$13cfba0e626db19061c9d61fa58e712d0319c11db97ad845fa84517f454f6675
rpcwhitelist=user1:getnetworkinfo
rpcwhitelist=user2:getnetworkinfo,getwalletinfo, getbestblockhash
rpcwhitelistdefault=0
```
Now user1 can only call getnetworkinfo, user2 can only call getnetworkinfo or getwalletinfo, while user3 can still call all RPCs.
If any rpcwhitelist is set, act as if all users are subject to whitelists unless rpcwhitelistdefault is set to 0. If rpcwhitelistdefault is set to 1 and no rpcwhitelist is set, act as if all users are subject to whitelists.
Review Request
=====
In addition to normal review, would love specific review from someone working on LN (e.g., @ roasbeef) and someone working on an infrastructure team at an exchange (e.g., @ jimpo) to check that this works well with their system.
Notes
=====
The rpc list is spelling sensitive -- whitespace is stripped though. Spelling errors fail towards the RPC call being blocked, which is safer.
It was unclear to me if HTTPReq_JSONRPC is the best function to patch this functionality into, or if it would be better to place it in exec or somewhere else.
It was also unclear to me if it would be preferred to cache the whitelists on startup or parse them on every RPC as is done with multiUserAuthorized. I opted for the cached approach as I thought it was a bit cleaner.
Future Work
=====
In a future PR, I would like to add an inheritance scheme. This seemed more controversial so I didn't want to include that here. Inheritance semantics are tricky, but it would also make these whitelists easier to read.
It also might be good to add a `getrpcwhitelist` command to facilitate permission discovery.
Tests
=====
Thanks to @ emilengler for adding tests for this feature. The tests cover all cases except for where `rpcwhitelistdefault=1` is used, given difficulties around testing with the current test framework.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 2081442c421cc4376e5d7839f68fbe7630e89103
Tree-SHA512: 0dc1ac6a6f2f4b0be9c9054d495dd17752fe7b3589aeab2c6ac4e1f91cf4e7e355deedcb5d76d707cbb5a949c2f989c871b74d6bf129351f429569a701adbcbf
b6f9e3576a1ea18572e4803aeb3f39330f0cb759 test: re-enable CLI test support by using EncodeDecimal in json.dumps() (fanquake)
Pull request description:
As mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17675#issuecomment-563188648.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK b6f9e3576a1ea18572e4803aeb3f39330f0cb759 assuming Travis is happy too -- diff looks correct :)
MarcoFalke:
> ACK b6f9e35 assuming Travis is happy too -- diff looks correct :)
Tree-SHA512: 79fa535cc1756c8ee610a3d6a316a1c4f036797d6990a5620e44985393a2e52f78450f8e0021d0a148c08705fd1ba765508464a365f9030ae0d2cacbd7a93e19
1583498fb6781c01ca2f33c09319ed793964c574 Send and require SENDADDRV2 before VERACK (Pieter Wuille)
c5a89196602e43ebb1cdc9cd4f08d153419c13e1 Don't send 'sendaddrv2' to pre-70016 software (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
BIP155 defines addrv2 and sendaddrv2 for all protocol versions, but some implementations reject messages they don't know. As a courtesy, don't send it to nodes with a version before 70016, as no software is known to support BIP155 that doesn't announce at least that protocol version number.
Also move the sending of sendaddrv2 earlier (before sending verack), as proposed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1043. This has the side effect that local address broadcast of torv3 will work (as it'll only trigger after we know whether or not the peer supports addrv2).
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 1583498fb6781c01ca2f33c09319ed793964c574
jnewbery:
ACK 1583498fb6781c01ca2f33c09319ed793964c574
jonatack:
ACK 1583498fb6781c01ca2f33c09319ed793964c574
vasild:
ACK 1583498
Tree-SHA512: 3bd5833fa8c8567b6dedd99e4a9b6bb71c127aa66d5284b217503c86d597dc59aa7382c41f3a4bf561bb658b89db81d1a7703a700eef4ffc17cb916660e23a82
a51d0ad2de89b9757d158df95ddeba2bfcb23935 rpc: Improve addnode remove command error message (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
The `addnode` RPC with the `remove` command parameter is used to remove a node from the "added nodes". It did not have test coverage and in case of failure to remove the node it responded with the confusing message "Error: Node has not been added.".
This PR adds test coverage and introduces a new error code as well as changes the error message to something that makes sense.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK a51d0ad2de89b9757d158df95ddeba2bfcb23935
theStack:
Tested ACK https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/a51d0ad2de
Tree-SHA512: 033ef5de0d4d49d58ef4df3759b838c9d19ee9dfb0aff9f814a3a63d124ca231a442c930efa7d343fe1f65727c4b59fc23dd5e26fe6ea69f9e84fda48b5c5cc2
ff22751417c6fbbd22f4eefd0e23431a83335c13 test: rm ascii art in rpc_fundrawtransaction (Jon Atack)
94fcc08541cf58bee864ab7c28a6c77e42472f17 test: add rpc_fundrawtransaction logging (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
`test/functional/rpc_fundrawtransaction.py` is fairly slow to run and has no logging, so it can appear to be stalled.
This commit adds info logging at each test to provide feedback on the test run.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK ff22751417
jnewbery:
tACK ff22751417c6fbbd22f4eefd0e23431a83335c13
Tree-SHA512: f4fabad8ef51c29981351bb4e66fb0c0e0517418a4a15892ef804df11d16b2d2ae1a1abc958d2b121819850278de90a2003b0edb8d7098d00360b89fa76e9062
