## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
- `bls generate` and `bls fromsecret` rpcs will return `scheme` used to
serialise the public key. Valid returned values are `legacy` and`basic`.
- `bls generate` and `bls fromsecret`rpcs accept an incoming optional
boolean argument `legacy` that enforces the use of legacy BLS scheme for
the serialisation of the reply even if v19 is active.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Platform and research team have requested this change.
## What was done?
`quorum info` was updated with the introduction of new field
`previousConsecutiveDKGFailures` that be returned only for rotated
LLMQs.
This field will hold the number of previously consecutive failed DGKs
for the corresponding quorumIndex before the currently active one.
Note: If no previously commitments were found then 0 will be returned
for `previousConsecutiveDKGFailures`.
Example:
- DKG `A` was successful
- DKG `B` failed
- DKG `C` failed
- DKG `D` was successful
- DKG `E` was successful
- `previousConsecutiveDKGFailures` = 0 when requesting for quorum `A`
(because `A` is the first ever created quorum for that quorumIndex)
- `previousConsecutiveDKGFailures` = 2 when requesting for quorum `D`
- `previousConsecutiveDKGFailures` = 0 when requesting for quorum `E`
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
It was requested by service desk to hide old banned masternodes when
calling rpc `masternodelist`.
The period from which a masternode is considered old banned is more than
a `SuperblockCycle`.
| Network | SuperblockCycle |
| ------------- |:-------------:|
| Mainnet | 16616 |
| Testnet | 24 |
| Devnet | 24 |
| Regtest | 10 |
The new mode `recent` was added to in order to hide old banned
masternodes.
Note: If the mode `recent` is used, then the reply mode is `JSON` (can
be additionally filtered)
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
adds release notes
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5123#issuecomment-1367737056
## What was done?
run `gen-manpages.sh` for 18.2.0 (on top of #5127 to include correct
assumevalid values)
## How Has This Been Tested?
n/a
## Breaking Changes
none
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
Added the fields `numValidMembers` and `healthRatio` in `quorum
listextended` RPC reply, as we need a quick way to see the health of all
quorums with a single command.
`healthRatio` range is `[0.0 - 1.0]`
Note: The decision to include both fields was taken because we need
cover the case where a quorum was created with `minSize` members but all
of them were valid.
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
- At the request of Platform team, this RPC should accept `height`
instead of `count`. RPC replies with the signing quorums active at
requested `height`. If `height` isn't specified, then tip is used for
the construction of the reply.
- Corrections were made on the description of reply model.
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
Added the fields `numValidMembers` and `healthRatio` in `quorum
listextended` RPC reply, as we need a quick way to see the health of all
quorums with a single command.
`healthRatio` range is `[0.0 - 1.0]`
Note: The decision to include both fields was taken because we need
cover the case where a quorum was created with `minSize` members but all
of them were valid.
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
- At the request of Platform team, this RPC should accept `height`
instead of `count`. RPC replies with the signing quorums active at
requested `height`. If `height` isn't specified, then tip is used for
the construction of the reply.
- Corrections were made on the description of reply model.
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
* Added quorum listextended
* Indentation fix
* Added release notes
* Added quorum listextended func test
* Refactored reply into map
* fix: change type from ARR to OBJ_DYN to properly print out the placeholder
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5 [test] PSBT RPC: check that bip32_derivs are present by default (Sjors Provoost)
29a21c90610aed88b796a7a5900e42e9048b990e [rpc] set default bip32derivs to true for psbt methods (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13557#pullrequestreview-135905054 I recommended not including bip32 deriviation by default in PSBTs:
> _Bit of a privacy issue_: let's say person A and B are about to spend from a multisig address, sending everything to person A. Person A gives their address to person B, their wallet wallet creates a PSBT, but doesn't sign it. Wallet A then calls `walletprocesspsbt` which signs it and _spontaneously adds the master_fingerprint and bip32 path_. Same issue with `walletcreatefundedpsbt`.
>
> Adding `bip32_derivs` should probably be opt-in.
In practice I find this default quite annoying because I forget it and end up with a confused hardware wallet.
More importantly, in the multisig example I provided, it's actually essential for the other side to know the derivation details (in addition to an xpub). This allows them to check that change is going to an address you can still co-sign for (because the spending policy is unchanged except for an index).
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 5bad7921d0
jonatack:
ACK 5bad7921d0 code review, built, ran tests, inspected/messed around with/pprinted values from the new tests. Thanks for adding the tests.
meshcollider:
utACK 5bad7921d0b33b62c0a59a478c2e8c869fc5e3b5
Tree-SHA512: 22ad71dda96856060a96758c4ae7aafa22d5e9efba30e0c8287c711e7579849bd72593cbc0f41a2e9e8821315d78bda04e848dbb006283b841b2795e2faebcfd
63ce882760e1ceb4114c716851aedaf911ebb93b doc: link to homebrew's troubleshooting page (Gastón I. Silva)
Pull request description:
A trivial documentation update.
When I was following the build steps for mac, I had some errors installing the dependencies. After searching on the Internet, and correcting the errors, I found that `brew doctor` had all the answers I needed. Could have skipped the Internet searches all together.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 63ce882760e1ceb4114c716851aedaf911ebb93b - a link to the troubleshooting page seems fine. I wouldn't really want our README to have anything more specific than that.
Tree-SHA512: 12c96cd9c9bd39ada21f3f27cbec3ed4bef4b8e74dec7872c892fc6a92a70418a5cc0882ff449883e91d96c01e1ca7104b076590917f397334c82931ec7fda1c
71d0344cf25d3aaf60112c5248198c444bc98105 docs: release note wording (Karl-Johan Alm)
3d2ff379131a01e4e9f9648b150e806104a23795 wallet/rpc: use static help text (Karl-Johan Alm)
53c3c1ea9e20f881c843a9219e48cec202e962f8 wallet/rpc/getbalances: add entry for 'mine.used' balance in results (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This addresses a few remaining issues pointed out in #13756:
* First commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r284907468
* Second commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r294868973
Ping jnewbery and achow101 as they pointed out these issues.
ACKs for commit 71d034:
jnewbery:
ACK 71d0344cf25d3aaf60112c5248198c444bc98105
meshcollider:
re-utACK 71d0344cf2
Tree-SHA512: 5e28822af0574ad07dbbed21aa2fe7866bf5770b4c0a1c150ad0da8af3152bcfb7170330a7497fa500326c594740ecf63733cf58325821e2811d7b911d5783a0
a2a03c3ca94b1cdd279ac09f2a81e04d262586fd fixing documentation to not require rpcpassword (“jkcd”)
Pull request description:
Configuration section in [doc/init.md](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/init.md) says user must set rpcpassword in order to run bitcoind. Since [71cbea](71cbeaad9a) fixed the code to use a cookie for authentication, it is not mandatory to set rpcpassword in the configuration.
Fixes#16346
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK a2a03c3ca94b1cdd279ac09f2a81e04d262586fd, modulo nit
Tree-SHA512: a62816fef78bed32200bb278cfc7aacf6ea154a60fdf5181927e48b806a1bd694bdf3ccec8362f5e58aad694d636c63f540323d54d85b61deaa417b95b8b56eb
fa7f5a4d2a2581cc25125311892a80efc2c494e2 doc: Update doc/bips.md with recent changes in master (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #17165
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa7f5a4d2a2581cc25125311892a80efc2c494e2. Verified markdown view at https://github.com/MarcoFalke/bitcoin-core/blob/1911-docBips/doc/bips.md and the urls in the links. Some of the PRs are indicated with # and some without, but this is the case over the whole document.
laanwj:
ACK fa7f5a4d2a2581cc25125311892a80efc2c494e2
fanquake:
ACK fa7f5a4d2a2581cc25125311892a80efc2c494e2
Tree-SHA512: 31782b5f1f2f10b1189f05f010f908c183dbe723477ca1c46ad1d3bee5ea483335847008a7fe48d72373ccd39b84e0b950d0d1b23e457cb70f34210c5f2dc6aa
104f7de5934f13b837fcf21f6d6b2559799eabe2 remove old bootstrap relevant code (tryphe)
Pull request description:
This picks up #15954
I fixed the code and added at a functional test utilizing the scripts in `contrib/linearize` as suggested by @MarcoFalke .
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 104f7de5934f13b837fcf21f6d6b2559799eabe2
Tree-SHA512: acac9f285f9785fcbc3afc78118461e45bec2962f90ab90e9f82f3ad28adc90a44f0443b712458ccf486e46d891eb8a67f53e7bee5fa6d89e4387814fe03f117
72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9 tests: functional watch-only wallet tests (William Casarin)
72ffbdc5799c1707ecad674d701b43fb80b031d0 doc: add release note for include_watchonly default changes (William Casarin)
003a3c73c0450aa18ac2ab2ca47def2b8c53a7df rpcwallet: document include_watchonly default for watchonly wallets (William Casarin)
a50d9e6c0b8e8144d3deec58ec2e3449ba081151 rpcwallet: default include_watchonly to true for watchonly wallets (William Casarin)
Pull request description:
Right now it's a bit annoying to deal with watchonly wallets, many rpc commands have an `include_watchonly` argument that needs to be explicitly set.
Wallets created with `createwallet` can have a `disable_private_keys` parameter, for those wallets we already know that they are watchonly, so there's no reason to have to explicitly ask for it for every command. Instead we check this wallet flag when the `include_watchonly` parameter isn't set.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code review ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9
Sjors:
ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9
promag:
ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9, code review only, didn't look closely to the test.
kallewoof:
ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9
fanquake:
ACK 72eaab073bc747425fe551777154b13a6c4c37c9 - I've looked over the changes, they make sense to me. Compiled and ran the tests etc.
Tree-SHA512: d3646b55e97f386594d7efc994f0712f3888475c6a5dc7f131ac9f8c49bf5d4677182b88f42b34152abe1ad101ecadd152b4c20e9d3c1267190db36f77ab8bd7
It's a shared library, so we should keep its name and API
distinguishable from Bitcoin's and avoid pkgconfig confusion
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add HaveKey and HaveCScript to SigningProvider
* Remove CKeyStore and squash into CBasicKeyStore
* Move HaveKey static function from keystore to rpcwallet where it is used
* scripted-diff: rename CBasicKeyStore to FillableSigningProvider
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l "CBasicKeyStore" | xargs sed -i -e 's/CBasicKeyStore/FillableSigningProvider/g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
* Move KeyOriginInfo to its own header file
* Move various SigningProviders to signingprovider.{cpp,h}
Moves all of the various SigningProviders out of sign.{cpp,h} and
keystore.{cpp,h}. As such, keystore.{cpp,h} is also removed.
Includes and the Makefile are updated to reflect this. Includes were largely
changed using:
git grep -l "keystore.h" | xargs sed -i -e 's;keystore.h;script/signingprovider.h;g'
* Remove CCryptoKeyStore and move all of it's functionality into CWallet
Instead of having a separate CCryptoKeyStore that handles the encryption
stuff, just roll it all into CWallet.
* Fixed cases of mess CWallet functions with CCryptoKeyStore and conflicts
* Move WatchOnly stuff from SigningProvider to CWallet
* Fixes for lint cirtular dependencies to calm linter
Co-authored-by: Andrew Chow <achow101-github@achow101.com>
5ebc6b0eb267e0552c66fffc5e5afe7df8becf80 bitcoind: update -avoidpartialspends description to account for auto-enable for avoid_reuse wallets (Karl-Johan Alm)
ada258f8c8f92d44d893cf9f22d15acdeca40b1a doc: release notes for avoid_reuse (Karl-Johan Alm)
27669551da52099e4a6a401acd7aa32b32832423 wallet: enable avoid_partial_spends by default if avoid_reuse is set (Karl-Johan Alm)
8f2e208f7c0468f9ba92bc789a698281b1c81284 test: add test for avoidreuse feature (Karl-Johan Alm)
0bdfbd34cf4015de87741ff549db35e5064f4e16 wallet/rpc: add 'avoid_reuse' option to RPC commands (Karl-Johan Alm)
f904723e0d5883309cb0dd14b826bc45c5e776fb wallet/rpc: add setwalletflag RPC and MUTABLE_WALLET_FLAGS (Karl-Johan Alm)
8247a0da3a46d7c38943ee0304343ab7465305bd wallet: enable avoid_reuse feature (Karl-Johan Alm)
eec15662fad917b169f5e3b8baaf4301dcf00a7b wallet: avoid reuse flags (Karl-Johan Alm)
58928098c299efdc7c5ddf2dc20716ca5272f21b wallet: make IsWalletFlagSet() const (Karl-Johan Alm)
129a5bafd9a3efa2fa16d780885048a06566d262 wallet: rename g_known_wallet_flags constant to KNOWN_WALLET_FLAGS (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
Add a new wallet flag called `avoid_reuse` which, when enabled, will keep track of when a specific destination has been spent from, and will actively "blacklist" any new UTXOs which send to an already-spent-from destination.
This improves privacy, as a payer could otherwise begin tracking a payee's wallet by regularly peppering a known UTXO with dust outputs, which would then be scooped up and used in payments by the payee, allowing the payer to map out (1) the inputs owned by the payee and (2) the destinations to which the payee is making payments.
This replaces #10386 and together with the (now merged) #12257 it addresses #10065 in full. The concerns raised in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10386#issuecomment-302361381 are also addressed due to #12257.
~~Note: this builds on top of #15780.~~ (merged)
ACKs for commit 5ebc6b:
jnewbery:
ACK 5ebc6b0eb
laanwj:
Concept and code-review ACK 5ebc6b0eb267e0552c66fffc5e5afe7df8becf80
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 5ebc6b0eb2
achow101:
ACK 5ebc6b0eb267e0552c66fffc5e5afe7df8becf80 modulo above nits
Tree-SHA512: fdef45826af544cbbb45634ac367852cc467ec87081d86d08b53ca849e588617e9a0a255b7e7bb28692d15332de58d6c3d274ac003355220e4213d7d9070742e
a5089f62bda9a39c1d6cbba285477670f1aa1f3f fix directory path for secp256k1 subtree in developer-notes (hackerrdave)
Pull request description:
Documentation update to fix the directory path of the `secp256k1` subtree in the developer notes
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK a5089f62bda9a39c1d6cbba285477670f1aa1f3f
Tree-SHA512: d0986721d7091af26edaee769db78c9aabac25bbaddb2a1bfa96c7208187226e280e9c38897b5227ee6c9e40d5a1af86bb7c58e72c6a30a94a478c4bf54c086e
* Fix build of qtbase in contrib for Gcc 11.x
It adds a patch with missing include <limits> in qtbase/src/tools/moc/generator.cpp
* Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23716: test: replace hashlib.ripemd160 with an own implementation
5b559dc7ecf37ab1604b75ec8ffe8436377a5fb1 Swap out hashlib.ripemd160 for own implementation (Pieter Wuille)
ad3e9e1f214d739e098c6ebbd300da5df1026a44 Add pure Python RIPEMD-160 (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Closes#23710.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK 5b559dc7ec, pending CI
Tree-SHA512: dcd4ea2027eac572f7ab0da434b081b9a5d6b78675e559258a446b4d254b29d93c4d2cc12da4a28303543d6d99f5f2246fde4052e84af81d18e04399b137b39e
* Updates doc for Unix build: added missing dependency bison
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
* Fix build of qtbase in contrib for Gcc 11.x
It adds a patch with missing include <limits> in qtbase/src/tools/moc/generator.cpp
* Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#23716: test: replace hashlib.ripemd160 with an own implementation
5b559dc7ecf37ab1604b75ec8ffe8436377a5fb1 Swap out hashlib.ripemd160 for own implementation (Pieter Wuille)
ad3e9e1f214d739e098c6ebbd300da5df1026a44 Add pure Python RIPEMD-160 (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Closes#23710.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK 5b559dc7ec, pending CI
Tree-SHA512: dcd4ea2027eac572f7ab0da434b081b9a5d6b78675e559258a446b4d254b29d93c4d2cc12da4a28303543d6d99f5f2246fde4052e84af81d18e04399b137b39e
* Updates doc for Unix build: added missing dependency bison
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke <falke.marco@gmail.com>
dbd137a4ea8f1b5dfc5cdc72cee99c8f8328b793 Improve build-osx formatting (Giulio Lombardo)
Pull request description:
This `PR` will improve `build-osx.md` formatting by:
1. Updating Markdown syntax to the latest one
2. Adding syntax highlighting to all code blocks
3. Aligning the text up to `80` column guideline (before it was following different guidelines, sometime `80`, sometime `90`, etc.)
4. Small grammar improvements here and there
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK dbd137a4ea8f1b5dfc5cdc72cee99c8f8328b793 - Document reads and renders essentially the same as the current `build-osx.md`, with minor formatting / grammatical changes.
Tree-SHA512: 47747991b5fddf0725c82f17f153e83150e51f698787544b4c51b32479989e4b550e2b3aec92979d2b0c76edfdcbbe7c4d9d0115df12e2bfde0cfcb277e9b984
a54ab2104c82c41d17ca603999a9a03161eefc9e [doc] fix Makefile target in benchmarking.md (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
While the resulting binary is called `bench_bitcoin`, the Makefile target is
named `bitcoin_bench` (see `src/Makefile.bench.include`)
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK a54ab2104c82c41d17ca603999a9a03161eefc9e - Tested on macOS and Debian 9.9, as this only [seemed to work there](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16536#discussion_r310366868) when these docs were added.
Tree-SHA512: bcf8d48ccba488f0533111a3be57ddc6c948b3a38beed129635e1c7e0b4608bc9ddf625e8469606bb31d4cedf3341c443564a197d6b1ab5268a9ed44ed5018a3
d20d756752 rpc: faster getblockstats using BlockUndo data (Felix Weis)
Pull request description:
Using undo data for a block (rev?????.dat) we can retrieve value information about prevouts and calculate the final transaction fee (rate). This approach is about 80x faster, drops the requirement for `-txindex`, and works for all non-pruned blocks.
```
# 2018-11-25T16:36:19Z Bitcoin Core version v0.17.99.0-edc715240-dirty (release build)
seq 550100 550200 0.00s user 0.00s system 62% cpu 0.004 total
xargs -n1 src/bitcoin-cli getblockstats 0.21s user 0.19s system 17% cpu 2.302 total
# 2018-11-25T16:39:17Z Bitcoin Core version v0.17.0 (release build)
seq 550100 550200 0.00s user 0.00s system 87% cpu 0.002 total
xargs -n1 src/bitcoin-cli getblockstats 0.24s user 0.22s system 0% cpu 3:19.42 total
```
ACKs for commit d20d75:
MarcoFalke:
re-utACK d20d7567528e216badb8475df298bb3cec008985
Tree-SHA512: 5babc3eb8d2fee2cb23dc12f522656b80737a540cbf2b13390a8f388304c46c064cca76f896b46a6e2abae8cc582d28e1ab20dd4bb17ad6142f20630c2d30c54
07cae5287c [wallet] remove unused GetScriptForMining (Sjors Provoost)
8bb3e4c487 [rpc] remove deprecated generate method (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
As announced in v0.18, the wallet generate rpc method is deprecated and will be fully removed in v0.19.
Clients should transition to using the node rpc method `generatetoaddress`.
Tree-SHA512: 9e5e913b59f3e18440b2b7b356124c7b87ad19f81a1ab6ada06a6c396b84e734895465f569296f1ba8c12abf74863bab5fd77765c9e806c239713aa83a59485f
3ed8e3d079a3860dcdf944f7c1aa37765a53da32 doc: Remove explicit network name references (Fabian Jahr)
d6e493f0c2850b522a676a005935163beddaa2cc wallet: Remove left-over BIP70 comment (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
A small follow-up to #17165 which removed BIP70 support.
1. Removes one leftover mention of BIP70 in a comment.
2. Removes BIP70 reference in comments on network/chain name strings. These can be removed as they are not really helpful and also incorrect: BIP70 only defines "main" and "test" but not "regtest". If/When signet gets merged we will add another name to the list that is not defined in BIP70. Mostly there is also an exhaustive list of the options included in the comment anyway.
If we would like to keep an identifier for this naming scheme, I would suggest switching to something more generic, like 'short chain name'. Happy to implement that if that is preferred. Alternatively, we could add a reference to `CBaseChainParams`. That would also mean we don't have to change these lines again for signet.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3ed8e3d079a3860dcdf944f7c1aa37765a53da32
Tree-SHA512: 9a7c0b9cacbb67bd31a089ffdc6f1ebc7f336493e2c8266eb697da34dce2b505a431d5639a3e4fc34f9287361343e861b55dc2662e0a1d2095cc1046db77d6ee
