## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Automation in private dashevo GitHub was failing due to the branch
trying to be built not having the automation be the newer tagged based
system. as such, if you simply tag a commit from the dashpay repo and
try to build it using automation, the build would fail. This should
resolve the issue. Recommended to BP so that we don't have this issue
when building v19.x branch builds
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
Creating a docker image should now be as simple pushing a branch and tag
to dashevo/dash; start the automation on branch develop with tag
previously specified
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We reset operator info on revocation; but then on replacement via new
register we try to "RemoveMN", which tries to remove platformNodeID but
that's already been cleared
## What was done?
Only try to delete platformNodeID if it's non-null
## How Has This Been Tested?
Mined with it on testnet; mining works
## Breaking Changes
This will fork off other testnet nodes, as this fixes the logic
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: Odysseas Gabrielides <odysseas.gabrielides@gmail.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
These messages are pretty annoying on reindex and shouldn't really be
shown in logs unless you actually need to debug mn payments.
## What was done?
move messages under `MNPAYMENTS` debug category
## How Has This Been Tested?
reindex
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
Before this fix, uniqueness of HPMN `platformNodeID` was checked only
while processing a block containing a `ProRegTx` or a `ProUpServTx`.
This is not enough as a `ProRegTx` or `ProUpServTx` containing duplicate
HPMN `platformNodeID` must be rejected at tx broadcast level.
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
Checking uniqueness when calling respective RPC and when receiving such
txs.
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
This allows us to have a bit more granular control over GetLLMQ results,
removes code duplication and also optimises things a tiny bit by
replacing "HasLLMQ + GetLLMQParams" calls with simply "GetLLMQParams".
Use `optional` in `GetLLMQ`, drop `HasLLMQ`.
run tests, reindex on testnet/mainnet
n/a
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Delayed activation to reexperience rc.6
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
HPMN fields were missing when selecting a HPMN in Masternodes tab of Qt
client.
## What was done?
Return HPMN fields in JSON reply of `CDeterministicMNState`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
When verifying signature of `CGovernanceVote`/`CGovernanceObject` we
need to use the active scheme.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Removed protx_revoke_legacy since it required a BLS secret key and not a
BLS public key.
(BLS scheme is not applicable to secret keys)
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`CDeterministicMNList` stores internally a map containing the hashes of
all properties that needed to be unique.
`pubKeyOperator` don't differ between the two schemes (legacy and
basic(v19)) but their serialisation do: hence their hash.
Because this internal map stores only hashes, then we need to
re-calculate hashes and repopulate.
So when we tried to revoke a masternode after the fork, the `ProUpRevTx`
couldn't be mined because the hash of the `pubKeyOperator` differed.
## What was done?
When retrieving a `CDeterministicMNList` for a given block, if v19 is
active for that block, then we repopulate the internal map.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Without this fix, `feature_dip3_v19.py` is failing with
`failed-calc-cb-mnmerkleroot` (Error encountered on Testnet)
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Help text for protx legacy versions were adjusted.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Block 847000 hf should happen somewhere around March 4th. We need mining
nodes to be upgraded to follow that chain and mine correct blocks.
However we don't want v19 to be activated shortly after (~300 blocks),
we want to give it a little bit of time to let (new) platform quorums
form and make sure everything is ok. With this patch we should have ~2
days (instead of half of a day).
## What was done?
bumped v19 activation start time to March 6th
## How Has This Been Tested?
n/a
## Breaking Changes
yes :)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
make linter happy, fix failures like
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/3858504407
## What was done?
drop trailing whitespace
## How Has This Been Tested?
`COMMIT_RANGE=1a810ca07d..HEAD ./test/lint/lint-whitespace.sh `
fails on develop, passes on this branch
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
After the DIP24 fork, instant locks will still be served by
`llmq_test_instantsend`, since no `llmq_test_dip0024` will be formed
with less than 4 nodes.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
- Added new LLMQ type `llmq_25_67`
- The above LLMQ is added only for Testnet and it is activated with v19
fork.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
`MIN_MASTERNODE_PROTO_VERSION` was bumped to match latest
`PROTOCOL_VERSION`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Builds are different, because git command output are different:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
in pr #5194 different OS produced different hashes of binary.
That's due to different behaviour of this command:
```sh
$ git rev-parse --short HEAD
b3f242da14 - on my localhost Kubuntu 22.10
b3f242da1 - inside pastapastapasta's docker
```
## What was done?
This fix forces to git print always 12 character
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run in different environment
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Overview page shows either wallet info or "Create wallet" button. Unlike
in bitcoin we can switch to other pages even when no wallets are enabled
(because we have Masternodes and Governance tabs) but then there is no
way to return back to Overview page.
## What was done?
Keep Overview tab always enabled. Make a no-wallet groupbox a member of
`WalletFrame` and add logic to switch to it when needed.
## How Has This Been Tested?
`./src/qt/dash-qt --regtest --nowallet`
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
PS. kudos to @thephez for reporting :)
Name of some files in gitian's build contains "18" instead 19.
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Version bumped in gitian's related configs
## How Has This Been Tested?
Will be tested with next RC of v19
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
@PastaPastaPasta may you update release TODO checklist, please?
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
In `protx register_hpmn`, `protx register_fund_hpmn`, `protx
register_prepare_hpmn` and `protx update_service_hpmn` the fields
`platformHTTPPort` and `platformP2PPort` were parsed as strings instead
of integers.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
`update_registrar_legacy` was missing from the protx help output.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
bfe1ba2f5b36056e0c41edf8206b93d3d83098df rel-builds: Specify core.abbrev for git-rev-parse (Carl Dong)
27e63e01cce368d67092de8f0c736927d6f6aa69 build: Accomodate makensis v2.x (Carl Dong)
1f2c39a30e0f82046c7aecddfda3eb99cb536816 guix: Remove logical cores requirement (Carl Dong)
a4f6ffa71e335d4b2a6bf525b7f416968f9cd9f7 lint: Also enable source statements for non-gitian (Carl Dong)
d256f91cb1b0d6ff5170106b99b0266cbe51f5a2 rel-builds: Directly deploy win installer to OUTDIR (Carl Dong)
fa791da02f9684e3fd554b687fb692ae6a23d65a nsis: Specify OutFile path only once (Carl Dong)
14701604d0904bc5bbf1c67de08f8ee6d3215523 guix: Expose GIT_COMMON_DIR in container as readonly (Carl Dong)
f5a6ac4f48b18f93050d77bcb23f9cf45ec34647 guix: Make source tarball using git-archive (Carl Dong)
395c1137f630dc495ffb2752a23bc1dfd470ee53 gitian: Limit sourced script to just assignments (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Based on: #18556
Related: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17595#discussion_r399728721
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK bfe1ba2f5b36056e0c41edf8206b93d3d83098df - I agree with Carl, and am going to merge this. I'd like for Linux Guix builds to be working again, and we can rebase #18818.
Tree-SHA512: c87ada7e3de17ca0b692a91029b86573442ded5780fc081c214773f6b374a0cdbeaf6f6898c36669c2e247ee32aa7f82defb1180f8decac52c65f0c140f18674
f2b5b0a3b48f9241971c14238040048f8b630811 build: add linker optimization flags to guix (fanquake)
b8b050a8d642e38c81d1e451750c2c8db92fee5e build: add linker optimization flags to gitian descriptors (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This PR adds `-Wl,O2` to our gitian and guix LDFLAGS. This makes the linker perform certain optimisations (and is different from LTO).
Any -O argument will enable optimizations in GNU ld. We can use -O2 here, as this matches our compile flags. Note that this would also enable additional optimizations if using the lld or gold linkers, when compared to -O0.
A nice writeup + diagrams of some of these optimizations is available here: http://lwn.net/Articles/192624/.
#### master
```bash
# bitcoind
Histogram for `.gnu.hash' bucket list length (total of 3 buckets)
Length Number % of total Coverage
0 1 ( 33.3%) 0.0%
1 0 ( 0.0%) 0.0%
2 1 ( 33.3%) 40.0%
3 1 ( 33.3%) 100.0%
```
```bash
# bitcoin-qt
Histogram for `.gnu.hash' bucket list length (total of 3 buckets)
Length Number % of total Coverage
0 0 ( 0.0%) 0.0%
1 1 ( 33.3%) 10.0%
2 0 ( 0.0%) 10.0%
3 0 ( 0.0%) 10.0%
4 1 ( 33.3%) 50.0%
5 1 ( 33.3%) 100.0%
```
#### this PR:
```bash
# bitcoind
Histogram for `.gnu.hash' bucket list length (total of 8 buckets)
Length Number % of total Coverage
0 3 ( 37.5%) 0.0%
1 5 ( 62.5%) 100.0%
```
```bash
# bitcoin-qt
Histogram for `.gnu.hash' bucket list length (total of 19 buckets)
Length Number % of total Coverage
0 9 ( 47.4%) 0.0%
1 10 ( 52.6%) 100.0%
```
#### GNU ld -O
> If level is a numeric values greater than zero ld optimizes the output. This might take significantly longer and therefore probably should only be enabled for the final binary. At the moment this option only affects ELF shared library generation. Future releases of the linker may make more use of this option. Also currently there is no difference in the linker’s behaviour for different non-zero values of this option. Again this may change with future releases.
#### lld -O
> Optimize output file size
ACKs for top commit:
dongcarl:
ACK f2b5b0a3b48f9241971c14238040048f8b630811
laanwj:
ACK f2b5b0a3b48f9241971c14238040048f8b630811
Tree-SHA512: e53f3a4338317dbec65d3a93b57b5a6204aabdf9ac82d99447847a3c8627facc53c58c2cf947376f13edd979fc8129a80f18d9ebeccd191a576c83f1dad5c513
a35e3235891d35daa167116cc70340140e883f06 guix: Appease travis. (Carl Dong)
0b66d22da5f53640e22f05adf880782c613e6d0f guix: Use gcc-9 for mingw-w64 instead of 8 (Carl Dong)
ba0b99bdd613ba7f17c6247ece3001e1b44759a3 guix: Don't set MINGW_HAS_SECURE_API CFLAG in depends (Carl Dong)
93439a71eda49fb69f1e82966a23a946733aa6fa guix: Bump to upstream commit with mingw-w64 changes (Carl Dong)
35a96792dda9e78165b1598aeac7b2ab759e7be5 guix: Check mingw symbols, improve SSP fix docs (Carl Dong)
449d8fe25bbe25daacfc67aa89ca32b0a3254c5a guix: Expand on INT trap message (Carl Dong)
3f1f03c67a8e9edf487f08d272adb18b0a3942c8 guix: Spelling fixes (Carl Dong)
ff821dd2a1c600488d11e7d9a20e9179ecc9144b guix: Reinstate make-ssp-fixed-gcc (Carl Dong)
360a9e0ad50a36ec79a1a160dbed3966689fd41c guix: Bump time-machine for mingw-w64 patches (Carl Dong)
93e41b7e3b54c17fd1b4c61ee95fc0dc2827e954 guix: Use gcc-8 for mingw-w64 instead of 7 (Carl Dong)
ef4f7e4c45c60a69406134122f091c77c6ef740f guix: Set the well-known timezone env var (Carl Dong)
acf4b3b3b5accf60a19441a0298ef27001b78e72 guix: Make x86_64-w64-mingw32 builds reproducible (Carl Dong)
c4cce00eac691625b78b92f7dba0b7f57def19e5 guix: Remove dead links from README. (Carl Dong)
df953a4c9a6143f45864757b706c88b6fa70545a guix: Appease shellcheck. (Carl Dong)
91897c95e191d293eb27d8af15cbeafc5b8f3895 guix: Improve guix-build.sh documentation (Carl Dong)
570d769c6c59b9f6d1a2b95b2ed60432cb33b3ba guix: Build support for Windows (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
~~Based on: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16519~~
Based on: #17933 (Time Machines are... shall we say... superior 😁)
This PR allows us to perform Guix builds for the `x86_64-w64-mingw32` target. We do this _without_ splitting up the build script like we do in Gitian by using this newfangled alien technology called `case` statements. (This is WIP and might be changed to `if` statements soon)
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK a35e3235891d35daa167116cc70340140e883f06 2/3
Tree-SHA512: c471951c23eb2cda919a71285d8b8f2580cb20f09d5db17b53e13dbd8813e01b3e7a83ea848e4913fd0f2bc12c6c133c5f76b54e65c0d89fed4dfd2e0be19875
0ae42a16c766a7ecb8711bfad6f22b8581ea0258 guix: Remove now-unnecessary gcc make flag (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
Previously, Guix would produce a gcc which did not know to use the SSP
function from glibc, and required a gcc make flag for it to do so, in my
attempt to fix it upstream I realized that this is no longer the case.
This can be verified by performing a Guix build and doing
readelf -s ... | grep __stack_chk
to check that symbols are coming from glibc, and doing
readelf -d ... | grep NEEDED | grep ssp
to see that libssp.so is not being depended on
```
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 0ae42a16c766a7ecb8711bfad6f22b8581ea0258 - ran a Guix build (hashes below) and checked all the linux binaries:
Tree-SHA512: 701b91e7c323b12a29af9539cb2656d10ce0a93af573a02e57f0b7fea05a6e1819798536eadb24d0a17e7f35b503f5e863fee5e7409db1b8a3973c4375e49d4e
fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c build: Skip i686 build by default in guix and gitian (MarcoFalke)
fa55a2554c2661b8f2a759044d5ac85c9979d9ca depends: Remove reference to win32 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Closes#17504
Now that we no longer provide downloads for i686 on our website (https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/), there is no need to build them by default.
i686 can still be built in depends (tested by ci/travis) and in guix/gitian by setting the appropriate `HOSTS`.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c -- patch looks correct
dongcarl:
ACK fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c patch looks correct
laanwj:
Code review ACK fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c
hebasto:
ACK fae9084ac5b10f94bdee54853d307838c4254e9c, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: b000c19a2cd2a596a52028fa298c4022c24cfdfc1bdb3795a90916d0a00a32e4dd22278db93790b6a11724e08ea8451f4f05c77bc40d1664518e11a8c82d6e29
88c83636d5a56bd9551577139786bdd3e74852c2 guix: Update documentation for time-machine (Carl Dong)
e6050884fdabfa6e51e6afce2041d91e60a5adec guix: Pin Guix using `guix time-machine` (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
An alternative to #16519, pinning our version of Guix and eliminating a `guix pull` and changing the default Guix profile of builders.
I think this method might be superior, as it:
- Eliminates the possibility of future changes to the `guix environment` command line interface breaking our builds
- Eliminates the need to set up a separate channel repo
It is a more general pinning solution than #16519.
-----
The reason why I didn't originally propose this is because `guix time-machine` is a recent addition to Guix, only available since `f675f8dec73d02e319e607559ed2316c299ae8c7`
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 88c83636d5a56bd9551577139786bdd3e74852c2
Tree-SHA512: 85e03b0987ffa86da73e02801e1cd8b7622698d70c4ba4e60561611be1e9717d661c2811a59b3e137b1b8eef2d0ba37c313867d035ebc89c3bd06a23a078064a
ac831339cbfa65b1f7576c53b5d9a94841db9868 doc: Fix some misspellings (randymcmillan)
Pull request description:
Here is a more thorough lint-spelling update.
This PR takes care of easy to fix spelling errors to clean up the linting stages.
There are misspellings coded into the functional tests.
That is a whole separate job within itself.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK ac831339cbfa65b1f7576c53b5d9a94841db9868 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: d8fad83fed083715655f148263ddeffc6752c8007d568fcf3dc2c418ccd5db70089ce3ccfd3994fcbd78043171402eb9cca5bdd5125287e22c42ea305aaa6e9d
751549b52a9a4cd27389d807ae67f02bbb39cd7f contrib: guix: Additional clarifications re: substitutes (Carl Dong)
cd3e947f50db7cfe05c05b368c25742193729a62 contrib: guix: Various improvements. (Carl Dong)
8dff3e48a9e03299468ed3b342642f01f70da9db contrib: guix: Clarify SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH. (Carl Dong)
3e80ec3ea9691c7c89173de922a113e643fe976b contrib: Add deterministic Guix builds. (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
~~**This post is kept updated as this project progresses. Use this [latest update link](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15277#issuecomment-497303718) to see what's new.**~~
Please read the `README.md`.
-----
### Guix Introduction
This PR enables building bitcoin in Guix containers. [Guix](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Features.html) is a transactional package manager much like Nix, but unlike Nix, it has more of a focus on [bootstrappability](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Bootstrapping.html) and [reproducibility](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/blog/tags/reproducible-builds/) which are attractive for security-sensitive projects like bitcoin.
### Guix Build Walkthrough
Please read the `README.md`.
[Old instructions no. 4](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15277#issuecomment-497303718)
[Old instructions no. 3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15277#issuecomment-493827011)
[Old instructions no. 2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15277#issuecomment-471658439)
<details>
<summary>Old instructions no. 1</summary>
In this PR, we define a Guix [manifest](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Invoking-guix-package.html#profile_002dmanifest) in `contrib/guix/manifest.scm`, which declares what packages we want in our environment.
We can then invoke
```
guix environment --manifest=contrib/guix/manifest.scm --container --pure --no-grafts --no-substitutes
```
To have Guix:
1. Build an environment containing the packages we defined in our `contrib/guix/manifest.scm` manifest from the Guix bootstrap binaries (see [bootstrappability](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Bootstrapping.html) for more details).
2. Start a container with that environment that has no network access, and no access to the host's filesystem except to the `pwd` that it was started in.
3. Drop you into a shell in that container.
> Note: if you don't want to wait hours for Guix to build the entire world from scratch, you can eliminate the `--no-substitutes` option to have Guix download from available binary sources. Note that this convenience doesn't necessarily compromise your security, as you can check that a package was built correctly after the fact using `guix build --check <packagename>`
Therefore, we can perform a build of bitcoin much like in Gitian by invoking the following:
```
make -C depends -j"$(nproc)" download && \
cat contrib/guix/build.sh | guix environment --manifest=contrib/guix/manifest.scm --container --pure --no-grafts --no-substitutes
```
We don't include `make -C depends -j"$(nproc)" download` inside `contrib/guix/build.sh` because `contrib/guix/build.sh` is run inside the container, which has no network access (which is a good thing).
</details>
### Rationale
I believe that this represents a substantial improvement for the "supply chain security" of bitcoin because:
1. We no longer have to rely on Ubuntu for our build environment for our releases ([oh the horror](72bd4ab867/contrib/gitian-descriptors/gitian-linux.yml (L10))), because Guix builds everything about the container, we can perform this on almost any Linux distro/system.
2. It is now much easier to determine what trusted binaries are in our supply chain, and even make a nice visualization! (see [bootstrappability](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Bootstrapping.html)).
3. There is active effort among Guix folks to minimize the number of trusted binaries even further. OriansJ's [stage0](https://github.com/oriansj/stage0), and janneke's [Mes](https://www.gnu.org/software/mes/) all aim to achieve [reduced binary boostrap](http://joyofsource.com/reduced-binary-seed-bootstrap.html) for Guix. In fact, I believe if OriansJ gets his way, we will end up some day with only a single trusted binary: hex0 (a ~500 byte self-hosting hex assembler).
### Steps to Completion
- [x] Successfully build bitcoin inside the Guix environment
- [x] Make `check-symbols` pass
- [x] Do the above but without nasty hacks
- [x] Solve some of the more innocuous hacks
- [ ] Make it cross-compile (HELP WANTED HERE)
- [x] Linux
- [x] x86_64-linux-gnu
- [x] i686-linux-gnu
- [x] aarch64-linux-gnu
- [x] arm-linux-gnueabihf
- [x] riscv64-linux-gnu
- [ ] OS X
- [ ] x86_64-apple-darwin14
- [ ] Windows
- [ ] x86_64-w64-mingw32
- [ ] Maybe make importer for depends syntax
- [ ] Document build process for future releases
- [ ] Extra: Pin the revision of Guix that we build with with Guix [inferiors](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Inferiors.html)
### Help Wanted
[Old content no. 3](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15277#issuecomment-483318210)
[Old content no. 2](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15277#issuecomment-471658439)
<details>
<summary>Old content no. 1</summary>
As of now, the command described above to perform a build of bitcoin a lot like Gitian works, but fails at the `check-symbols` stage. This is because a few dynamic libraries are linked in that shouldn't be.
Here's what `ldd src/bitcoind` looks like when built in a Guix container:
```
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffcc2d90000)
libdl.so.2 => /gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fb7eda09000)
librt.so.1 => /gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/librt.so.1 (0x00007fb7ed9ff000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /gnu/store/4sqps8dczv3g7rwbdibfz6rf5jlk7w90-gcc-5.5.0-lib/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fb7ed87c000)
libpthread.so.0 => /gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007fb7ed85b000)
libm.so.6 => /gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007fb7ed6da000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /gnu/store/4sqps8dczv3g7rwbdibfz6rf5jlk7w90-gcc-5.5.0-lib/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fb7ed6bf000)
libc.so.6 => /gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007fb7ed506000)
/gnu/store/h90vnqw0nwd0hhm1l5dgxsdrigddfmq4-glibc-2.28/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007fb7ee3a0000)
```
And here's what it looks in one of our releases:
```
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffff52cd000)
libpthread.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f87726b4000)
librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 (0x00007f87726aa000)
libm.so.6 => /usr/lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007f8772525000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f877250b000)
libc.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f8772347000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /usr/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f8773392000)
```
~~I suspect it is because my script does not apply the gitian-input patches [described in the release process](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/release-process.md#fetch-and-create-inputs-first-time-or-when-dependency-versions-change) but there is no description as to how these patches are applied.~~ It might also be something else entirely.
Edit: It is something else. It appears that the gitian inputs are only used by [`gitian-win-signer.yml`](d6e700e40f/contrib/gitian-descriptors/gitian-win-signer.yml (L14))
</details>
### How to Help
1. Install Guix on your distro either [from source](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Requirements.html) or perform a [binary installation](https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/en/html_node/Binary-Installation.html#Binary-Installation)
2. Try out my branch and the command described above!
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Thanks for the replies. ACK 751549b52a9a4cd27389d807ae67f02bbb39cd7f
laanwj:
ACK 751549b52a9a4cd27389d807ae67f02bbb39cd7f
Tree-SHA512: 50e6ab58c6bda9a67125b6271daf7eff0ca57d0efa8941ed3cd951e5bf78b31552fc5e537b1e1bcf2d3cc918c63adf19d685aa117a0f851024dc67e697890a8d
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Avoid redundant calls to GetLLMQParams
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
