* Use string_view instead of string for SERIALIZATION_VERSION_STRING. Also introduces string_view serialization. Also use string_view where (trivially) possible for params
* separate GetSporks and sporks net msg processing into its own method
* refactor: spork, use c++17 if-init
* refactor: spork, remove unused params, make param pt
* refactor: spork, use simplier construction
* refactor: spork, make strError part of if-init, also w/o redundant initialization
* refactor: spork, use structured binding
* refactor: spork, use for instead of while
* clang-format: spork.cpp
* resolve cppcheck linter warning about unused variable
42a5e912ee4e91a5191d659588f0605e1ada2f33 [mempool] log correct messages when CPFP fails (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Fixes a logging issue introduced in #15681
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 42a5e912ee4e91a5191d659588f0605e1ada2f33 (+utACK from bluematt that isn't registered because it has no commit id)
Tree-SHA512: ff5f423cc4d22838eea00c5b1d39ceda89cd61474c72f256a97c698eb0ec3f2156a97139f537669376132902c1e3943bf84c356a4b98a9a306b4ec57302c2761
50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced [mempool] Allow one extra single-ancestor transaction per package (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This implements the proposed policy change from [1], which allows
certain classes of contract protocols involving revocation
punishments to use CPFP. Note that some such use-cases may still
want some form of one-deep package relay, though even this alone
may greatly simplify some lightning fee negotiation.
[1] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-November/016518.html
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced -- looked over code again, compared with previous commit, compiles, etc.
sdaftuar:
ACK 50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced
ryanofsky:
utACK 50cede3f5a4d4fbfbb7c420b94e661a6a159bced. Changes since last review: adding EXTRA_DESCENDANT_TX_SIZE_LIMIT constant, changing max ancestor size from 1,000,000 to nLimitAncestorSize constant (101,000), fixing test comment and getting rid of unused test node.
Tree-SHA512: b052c2a0f384855572b4579310131897b612201214b5abbb225167224e4f550049e300b471dbf320928652571e92ca2d650050b7cf39ac92b3bc1d2bcd386c1c
eb4c43e49f625895670866b89bb56ca641c4eeb7 doc: documents how to calculate m_assumed_blockchain_size and m_assumed_chain_state_size on the release process. (marcoagner)
Pull request description:
Regarding [this](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15183#issuecomment-463133734) on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15183.
Added an "Additional information" section for this which seems reasonable to me but may not be the best place for this. Also, let me know if anything else should be documented here (like more details).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK eb4c43e49f625895670866b89bb56ca641c4eeb7
Tree-SHA512: 7e6fc46740daa01dd9be5a8da7846e7a9f7fa866bf31fdc2cb252f90c698cfd6ef954f9588f7abcebda2355ec2b2a380635e14a164e53e77d38abefa3e2cc698
43e7d576f590e90ad7d1ba3d550671a7958f1188 doc: Improve test READMEs (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
General improvements on READMEs for unit tests and functional tests:
- Give unit test readme a headline
- Move general information on `src/test` folder to the top
- Add information on logging and debugging unit tests
- Improve debugging and logging information in functional testing
- Include all available log levels in functional tests
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 43e7d576f590e90ad7d1ba3d550671a7958f1188
Tree-SHA512: 22b27644992ba5d99a885cd51b7a474806714396fcea1fd2d6285e41bdf3b28835ad8c81449099e3ee15a63d57b3ab9acb89c425d9855ed1d9b4af21db35ab03
fa69588537bc91c0aedbc89ef1760d89cbffad75 test: Make PORT_MIN in test runner configurable (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is needed when some ports in the port range are used by other processes. Note that simply assigning the ports dynamically does not work:
* We spin up several nodes per test (each node gets its own port)
* We run several tests in parallel
So to avoid nodes from different tests colliding on ports, the port assignment must be deterministic (can not be dynamic).
Fixes: #10869
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa69588537bc91c0aedbc89ef1760d89cbffad75 -- diff looks correct
promag:
ACK fa69588537bc91c0aedbc89ef1760d89cbffad75.
Tree-SHA512: e79adb015e7de79064e2d14336c38bc9672bd779ad6c52917721897e73f617c39d32c068a369c26670002a6c4ab95a71ef3a6878ebdd9710e02f410e2f7bcd14
96299a9d6c0a6b9125a58a63ee3147e55d1b086b Test: Move common function assert_approx() into util.py (fridokus)
Pull request description:
To reduce code duplication, move `assert_approx` into common framework `util.py`.
`assert_approx()` is used in two functional tests.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK 96299a9
practicalswift:
ACK 96299a9d6c0a6b9125a58a63ee3147e55d1b086b -- DRY is good and diff looks correct
fanquake:
ACK 96299a9d6c0a6b9125a58a63ee3147e55d1b086b - thanks for contributing 🍻
Tree-SHA512: 8e9d397222c49536c7b3d6d0756cc5af17113e5af8707ac48a500fff1811167fb2e03f3c0445b0b9e80f34935f4d57cfb935c4790f6f5463a32a67df5f736939
fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 test: Remove unused connect_nodes_bi (MarcoFalke)
fa3b9ee8b2280af4bcbcfffff275aaf8dd125929 scripted-diff: test: Replace connect_nodes_bi with connect_nodes (MarcoFalke)
faaee1e39a91b3f603881655d3980c29af09852b test: Use connect_nodes when connecting nodes in the test_framework (MarcoFalke)
1111bb91f517838e5b9f778bf6b5a9c8d561e857 test: Reformat python imports to aid scripted diff (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
By default all test nodes are connected in a chain. However, instead of just a single connection between each pair of nodes, we end up with up to four connections for a "middle" node (two outbound, two inbound, from each side).
This is generally redundant (tx and block relay should succeed with just a single connection) and confusing. For example, test timeouts after a call to `sync_` may be racy and hard to reproduce. On top of that, the test `debug.log`s are hard to read because txs and block invs may be relayed on the same connection multiple times.
Fix this by inlining `connect_nodes_bi` in the two tests that need it, and then replace it with a single `connect_nodes` in all other tests.
Historic background:
`connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2
jonasschnelli:
utACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2 - more of less a cleanup PR.
promag:
Tested ACK fadfd844de8c53034a97dfa6f771ffe9f523fba2, ran extended tests.
Tree-SHA512: 2d027a8fd150749c071b64438a0a78ec922178628a7dbb89fd1212b0fa34febd451798c940101155d3617c0426c2c4865174147709894f1f1bb6cfa336aa7e24
0c62e3aa73839e97e65a3155e06a98d84b700a1e New regression testing for CVE-2018-17144, CVE-2012-2459, and CVE-2010-5137. (lucash-dev)
38bfca6bb2ad68719415e9c54a981441052da072 Added comments referencing multiple CVEs in tests and production code. (lucash-dev)
Pull request description:
This functional test includes two scenarios that test for regressions of vulnerabilities, but they are only briefly described. There are freely available documents explaining in detail the issues, but without explicit mentions, the developer trying to maintain the code needs an additional step of digging in commit history and PR conversations to figure it out.
Added comments to explicitly mention CVE-2018-17144 and CVE-2012-2459, for more complete documentation.
This improves developer experience by making understanding the tests easier.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 0c62e3aa73839e97e65a3155e06a98d84b700a1e, checked the CVE numbers, thanks for adding documentation
Tree-SHA512: 3ee05351745193b8b959e4a25d50f25a693b2d24b0732ed53cf7d5882df40b5dd0f1877bd5c69cffb921d4a7acf9deb3cc1160b96dc730d9b5984151ad06b7c9
fae961de6be3e2ab9793d437079651541e219e71 test: Establish only one connection between nodes in rpc_invalidateblock (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Headers and block sync should eventually converge to the same result, regardless of whether the peers treat each other as "inbound" or "outbound".
`connect_nodes_bi` has been introduced as a (temporary?) workaround for bug #5113 and #5138, which has long been fixed in #5157 and #5662.
Thus remove the `connect_nodes_bi` workaround from the rpc_invalidateblock test.
Conveniently, this also closes#16453. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16444#issuecomment-514801708 for rationale
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fae961de6be3e2ab9793d437079651541e219e71
Tree-SHA512: b3614c66a205823df73f64d19cacfbec269beb5db52ff79004d746e17d7c0dfb43ab9785fdddc97e2a76fe76286c8c605b34df3dda4a2bf5be035f01169ae89a
7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34 test: Tool wallet test coverage for unexpected writes to wallet (Jon Atack)
3bf2b3a37bbd550491d124b77fd7c1b2a7969f66 test: Split tool_wallet.py test into subtests (Jon Atack)
1eb13f09a9d8c2c7dc69f4cdf1b1ccf632543aa0 test: Add log messages to test/functional/tool_wallet.py (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This pull request adds test coverage in `test/functional/tool_wallet.py` to reproduce unexpected writes to the wallet as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15608 and serve as a benchmark for fixing the issue:
- Wallet tool `info` unexpectedly writes to the wallet file if the wallet file permissions are read/write.
- Wallet tool `info` raises with "Error loading . Is wallet being used by another process?" if the wallet file permissions are read-only.
Goals:
1. Reproduce the reported issue, define the current unexpected behavior, and add test coverage to guide a future fix. Add debug-level logging for sanity checking and commented-out assertions to be uncommented when fixing the issue. Add the same coverage to the wallet tool create test and the getwalletinfo test as regression tests while fixing the issue.
2. Add info log messages as there are currently none in the test file.
3. Split the tests out to separate functions as per review feedback.
Thanks to Marco Falke for pointing me in the right direction.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 7195fa792fcc19e9c064c4e38814c3b46a210b34
Tree-SHA512: 16a41cce989c8f819cf5b02c6cf8ea84653ede2738fb402f6c36cf4dc075b424dff3e2c73a1cfa1ec9c75f614675baecc71e588845a2596db06ba0957db2df7b
faa1e0fb1712b1f94334e42794163f79988270fd qt: test: Create at most one testing setup (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is assumed that ideally only one BasicTestingSetup exists at any point in time for each process (due to use of globals).
This assumption is violated in the GUI tests, as a testing setup is created as the first step of the `main` function and then (sometimes) another one for the following test cases.
So, the gui tests create two testing setups:
* `BasicTestingSetup` in `main` (added in fa4a04a5a942d582c62773d815c7e1e9897975d0)
* a testing setup for individual test cases
Avoid that by destructing the testing setup in main after creation and then move the explicit `ECC_Stop` to the only places where it is needed (before and after `apptests`).
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK faa1e0fb1712b1f94334e42794163f79988270fd
Tree-SHA512: b8edceb7e2a8749e1de3ea80bc20b6fb7d4390bf366bb9817206ada3dc8669a91416f4803c22a0e6c636c514e0c858dcfe04523221f8851b10deaf472f107d82
084e17cebd424b8e8ced674bc810eef4e6ee5d3b Remove unused includes (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
As requested by MarcoFalke in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16273#issuecomment-521332089:
This PR removes unused includes.
Please note that in contrast to #16273 I'm limiting the scope to the trivial cases of pure removals (i.e. no includes added) to make reviewing easier.
I'm seeking "Concept ACK":s for this obviously non-urgent minor cleanup.
Rationale:
* Avoids unnecessary re-compiles in case of header changes.
* Makes reasoning about code dependencies easier.
* Reduces compile-time memory usage.
* Reduces compilation time.
* Warm fuzzy feeling of being lean :-)
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 084e17cebd424b8e8ced674bc810eef4e6ee5d3b. PR only removes include lines and it still compiles. In the worst case someone might have to explicitly add an include later for something now included implicitly. But maybe some effort was taken to avoid this, and it wouldn't be a tragedy anyway.
Tree-SHA512: 89de56edc6ceea4696e9579bccff10c80080821685b9fb4e8c5ef593b6e43cf662f358788701bb09f84867693f66b2e4db035b92b522a0a775f50b7ecffd6a6d
