## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
same as #5392, alternative solution
~based on #5402 atm, will rebase later~
## What was done?
pls see individual commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
reorg mainnet around forkpoint with a patched client (to allow low
difficulty), run tests
## Breaking Changes
Another evodb migration is required. Going back to an older version or
migrating after the fork requires reindexing.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
e09c701e0110350f78366fb837308c086b6503c0 scripted-diff: Bump copyright of files changed in 2020 (MarcoFalke)
6cbe6209646db8914b87bf6edbc18c6031a16f1e scripted-diff: Replace CCriticalSection with RecursiveMutex (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`RecursiveMutex` better clarifies that the mutex is recursive, see also the standard library naming: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/recursive_mutex
For that reason, and to avoid different people asking me the same question repeatedly (e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15932#pullrequestreview-339175124 ), remove the outdated alias `CCriticalSection` with a scripted-diff
eb7b78165966f2c79da71b993c4c4d793e37297f modify p2p_feefilter test to catch rounding error (Gregory Sanders)
6a51f7951716d6d6fc0f9b56028f3a0dd02b61c8 Disallow implicit conversion for CFeeRate constructor (Gregory Sanders)
8e59af55aaf1b196575084bce2448af02d97d745 feefilter: Compute the absolute fee rather than stored rate to match mempool acceptance logic (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
This means we will use the rounding-down behavior in `GetFee` to match both mempool acceptance and wallet logic, with minimal changes.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16499
Replacement PR for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16500
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK eb7b78165966f2c79da71b993c4c4d793e37297f code review only
naumenkogs:
utACK eb7b78165966f2c79da71b993c4c4d793e37297f
achow101:
re ACK eb7b78165966f2c79da71b993c4c4d793e37297f
promag:
ACK eb7b78165966f2c79da71b993c4c4d793e37297f.
Tree-SHA512: 484a11c8f0e825f0c983b1f7e71cf6252b1bba6858194abfe4c088da3bae8a418ec539ef6c4181bf30940e277a95c08d493595d59dfcc6ddf77c65b05563dd7e
9e1cb1adf1800efe429e348650931f2669b0d2c0 [trivial/doc] Fix comment type (Amiti Uttarwar)
8f30260a67166a6ab7c0f33f7ec1990d3c31761e [doc] Update unbroadcast description in RPC results (Amiti Uttarwar)
750456d6f29c63d57af05bfbdd6035bb9c965de2 [trivial] Remove misleading 'const' (Amiti Uttarwar)
fa32e676e5833a5c5fc735ef00c0a80f5fab7a2c [test] Manage node connections better in mempool persist test (Amiti Uttarwar)
1f94bb0c744a103b633c1051e8fbc01e612097dc [doc] Provide rationale for randomization in scheduling. (Amiti Uttarwar)
9c8a55d9cb0ec73f10b196e79b637aa601c0a6b7 [mempool] Don't throw expected error message when upgrading (Amiti Uttarwar)
ba5498318233ab81decbc585e9619d8ffe2df1b0 [test] Test that wallet transactions aren't rebroadcast before 12 hours (Amiti Uttarwar)
00d44a534b4e5ae249b8011360c6b0f7dc731581 [test] P2P connection behavior should meet expectations (Amiti Uttarwar)
bd093ca15de762fdaf0937a0877d17b0c2bce16e [test] updates to unbroadcast test (Amiti Uttarwar)
dab298d9ab5a5a41685f437db9081fa7b395fa73 [docs] add release notes (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow up to #18038 which introduced the idea of an unbroadcast set & focuses mostly on documentation updates and test fixes. One small functionality update to not throw an expected error in `LoadMempool` when you upgrade software versions.
#18895 is another follow up to that addresses other functionality updates.
Background context:
The unbroadcast set is a mechanism for the mempool to track locally submitted transactions (via wallet or RPC). The node does a best-effort of delivering the transactions to the network via retries every 10-15 minutes until either a `GETDATA` is received or the transaction is removed from the mempool.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 9e1cb1adf1 👁
gzhao408:
ACK [`9e1cb1a`](9e1cb1adf1)
Tree-SHA512: 0cd51c4ca368b9dce92d50d73ec6e9df278a259e609eef2858f24cb8595ad07acc3db781d9eb0c351715f18fca5a2b4526838981fdb34a522427e9dc868bdaa6
651f1d816f054cb9c637f8a99c9360bba381ef58 [test] wait for inital broadcast before comparing mempool entries (gzhao408)
9d3f7eb9860254eb787ebe2734fd6a26bcf365c1 [mempool] sanity check that all unbroadcast txns are in mempool (gzhao408)
a7ebe48b94c5a9195c8eabd193204c499cb4bfdb [rpc] add unbroadcast info to mempool entries and getmempoolinfo (gzhao408)
d16006960443c2efe37c896e46edae9dca86c57d [wallet] remove nLastResend logic (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
Followup to #18038 by amitiuttarwar which introduces the unbroadcast set: "a mechanism for the mempool to track locally submitted transactions" and decreases the frequency of rebroadcast from 10-15 minutes to 12-36 hours.
This PR addresses some of the outstanding TODOs building on top of it:
- remove `nLastResend` logic, which is used to ensure rebroadcast doesn't happen again if no new block has been mined (makes sense in 10-15 min period, but not necessary for 12-36 hour period). (#18038 [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18038#discussion_r416826914))
- expose unbroadcast info via RPCs, for more informative queries and testing (#18038 [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18038#discussion_r416837980))
- add sanity check to verify unbroadcast transactions still exist in mempool before rebroadcasting (#18038 [comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18038#discussion_r416861609))
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
Code review ACK 651f1d816f054cb9c637f8a99c9360bba381ef58
amitiuttarwar:
ACK 651f1d816f054cb9c637f8a99c9360bba381ef58 🎉
MarcoFalke:
Review ACK 651f1d816f054cb9c637f8a99c9360bba381ef58
Tree-SHA512: d5327e95ef39d44152b48df5c610502ae11c168f43dbbfb2885340c93d1ba9426eb3a5794573f5fc843502109cb3ffb63efa3f2db4f8f112efcde8f76d9a8845
020f0519ec66d9626255b938e1c6c3f7f9aa4017 refactor: CTxMemPool::IsUnbroadcastTx() requires CTxMemPool::cs lock (Hennadii Stepanov)
7c4bd0387a01a0c3e2938d530dba3c882e4d8f2b refactor: CTxMemPool::GetTotalTxSize() requires CTxMemPool::cs lock (Hennadii Stepanov)
fa5fcb032b6ed04c49ee465235288b8059fa805e refactor: CTxMemPool::ClearPrioritisation() requires CTxMemPool::cs lock (Hennadii Stepanov)
7140b31b90cbd84d75eedb3e395d0d55f83b5b95 refactor: CTxMemPool::ApplyDelta() requires CTxMemPool::cs lock (Hennadii Stepanov)
66e47e5e506043fbb9b4e487b44bf992985709c9 refactor: CTxMemPool::UpdateChild() requires CTxMemPool::cs lock (Hennadii Stepanov)
939807768acd508932f2efabee660d56324a73df refactor: CTxMemPool::UpdateParent() requires CTxMemPool::cs lock (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This is another step to transit `CTxMemPool::cs` from `RecursiveMutex` to `Mutex`.
Split out from #19306.
Only trivial thread safety annotations and lock assertions added. No new locks. No behavior change.
Refactoring `const uint256` to `const uint256&` was [requested](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19647#discussion_r468471022) by **promag**.
Please note that now, since #19668 has been merged, it is safe to apply `AssertLockHeld()` macros as they do not swallow compile time Thread Safety Analysis warnings.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Core review ACK 020f0519ec66d9626255b938e1c6c3f7f9aa4017.
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 020f0519ec66d9626255b938e1c6c3f7f9aa4017
vasild:
ACK 020f0519e
Tree-SHA512: a31e389142d5a19b25fef0aaf1072a337278564528b5cc9209df88ae548a31440e1b8dd9bae0169fd7aa59ea06e22fe5e0413955386512b83ef1f3e7d941e890
e57980b4738c10344baf136de3e050a3cb958ca5 [mempool] Remove NotifyEntryAdded and NotifyEntryRemoved callbacks (John Newbery)
2dd561f36124972d2364f941de9c3417c65f05b6 [validation] Remove pool member from ConnectTrace (John Newbery)
969b65f3f527631ede1a31c7855151e5c5d91f8f [validation] Remove NotifyEntryRemoved callback from ConnectTrace (John Newbery)
5613f9842b4000fed088b8cf7b99674c328d15e1 [validation] Remove conflictedTxs from PerBlockConnectTrace (John Newbery)
cdb893443cc16edf974f099b8485e04b3db1b1d7 [validation interface] Remove vtxConflicted from BlockConnected (John Newbery)
1168394d759b13af68acec6d5bfa04aaa24561f8 [wallet] Notify conflicted transactions in TransactionRemovedFromMempool (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
These boost signals were added in #9371, before we had a `TransactionRemovedFromMempool` method in the validation interface. The `NotifyEntryAdded` callback was used by validation to build a vector of conflicted transactions when connecting a block, which the wallet was notified of in the `BlockConnected` CValidationInterface callback.
Now that we have a `TransactionRemovedFromMempool` callback, we can fire that signal directly from the mempool for conflicted transactions.
Note that #9371 was implemented to ensure `-walletnotify` events were fired for these conflicted transaction. We inadvertently stopped sending these notifications in #16624 (Sep 2019 commit 7e89994). We should probably fix that, but in a different PR.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Re-ACK e57980b
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK e57980b4738c10344baf136de3e050a3cb958ca5, no code changes since previous review, but helpful new code comments have been added and the PR description is now more clear about where the old code came from
Tree-SHA512: 3bdbaf1ef2731e788462d4756e69c42a1efdcf168691ce1bbfdaa4b7b55ac3c5b1fd4ab7b90bcdec653703600501b4224d252cfc086aef28f9ce0da3b0563a69
faec689bed7a5b66e2a7675853d10205b933cec8 txmempool: Make entry time type-safe (std::chrono) (MarcoFalke)
faaa1f01daba94b021ca77515266a16d27f0364e util: Add count_seconds time helper (MarcoFalke)
1111170f2f0141084b5b4ed565b2f07eba48599a test: mempool entry time is persisted (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This changes the type of the entry time of txs into the mempool from `int64_t` to `std::chrono::seconds`.
The benefits:
* Documents the type for developers
* Type violations result in compile errors
* After compilation, the two are equivalent (at no run time cost)
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
utACK faec689bed7a5b66e2a7675853d10205b933cec8
laanwj:
ACK faec689bed7a5b66e2a7675853d10205b933cec8
Tree-SHA512: d958e058755d1a1d54cef536a8b30a11cc502b7df0d6ecf84a0ab1d38bc8105a67668a99cd5087a444f6de2421238111c5fca133cdf8e2e2273cb12cb6957845
d314e8a818d4c162b1c7201533e6b600dcab2d91 refactor: Replace all uses of boost::optional with our own Optional type (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Replace all uses of boost::optional with our own Optional type. Luckily, there aren't so many.
After this:
- `boost::optional` is no longer used directly (only through `Optional` which is an alias for it)
- `boost/optional.hpp` is only included in one place
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK d314e8a818d4c162b1c7201533e6b600dcab2d91
practicalswift:
ACK d314e8a818d4c162b1c7201533e6b600dcab2d91 -- diff looks correct + satisfying to see incremental progress towards the goal of a Boost free future :)
jtimon:
ACK d314e8a818d4c162b1c7201533e6b600dcab2d91
fanquake:
ACK d314e8a818d4c162b1c7201533e6b600dcab2d91
Tree-SHA512: b43e0017af81b07b5851377cd09624f114510ac5b9018d037664b58ad0fc8e893e30946b61f8f5e21e39125925bf9998a81f2226b468aab2df653ee57ed3213d
effe81f750 Move g_is_mempool_loaded into CTxMemPool::m_is_loaded (Ben Woosley)
bb8ae2c419 rpc: Expose g_is_mempool_loaded via getmempoolinfo and /rest/mempool/info.json (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
And use it to fix a race condition in mempool_persist.py:
https://travis-ci.org/Empact/bitcoin/jobs/487577243
Since e.g. getrawmempool returns errors based on this status, this
enables users to test it for readiness.
Fixes#12863
ACKs for commit effe81:
MarcoFalke:
utACK effe81f750
jnewbery:
utACK effe81f7503d2ca3c88cfdea687f9f997f353e0d
Tree-SHA512: 74328b0c17a97efb8a000d4ee49b9a673c2b6dde7ea30c43a6a2eff961a233351c9471f9a42344412135786c02bdf2ee1b2526651bb8fed68bd94d2120c4ef86
0000ff0aa763e3be524ac4537a41048a26529fb2 txmempool: Remove unused default value MemPoolRemovalReason::UNKNOWN (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `remove*` methods set the removal reason to `UNKNOWN` by default. This is nowhere used; Except in tests, where the value doesn't matter. Fix that by removing the confusing default.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
utACK 0000ff0aa763e3be524ac4537a41048a26529fb2
promag:
ACK 0000ff0aa763e3be524ac4537a41048a26529fb2.
jonasschnelli:
utACK 0000ff0aa763e3be524ac4537a41048a26529fb2
Tree-SHA512: ffc8b35dd3291a81225171577c743c8bb2645638cab02960b6361174cb68afd739aaab7ab8661d65de5750d37daf16bb7eee9338958d8609093a8d46c2ada1ab
084e17cebd424b8e8ced674bc810eef4e6ee5d3b Remove unused includes (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
As requested by MarcoFalke in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16273#issuecomment-521332089:
This PR removes unused includes.
Please note that in contrast to #16273 I'm limiting the scope to the trivial cases of pure removals (i.e. no includes added) to make reviewing easier.
I'm seeking "Concept ACK":s for this obviously non-urgent minor cleanup.
Rationale:
* Avoids unnecessary re-compiles in case of header changes.
* Makes reasoning about code dependencies easier.
* Reduces compile-time memory usage.
* Reduces compilation time.
* Warm fuzzy feeling of being lean :-)
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 084e17cebd424b8e8ced674bc810eef4e6ee5d3b. PR only removes include lines and it still compiles. In the worst case someone might have to explicitly add an include later for something now included implicitly. But maybe some effort was taken to avoid this, and it wouldn't be a tragedy anyway.
Tree-SHA512: 89de56edc6ceea4696e9579bccff10c80080821685b9fb4e8c5ef593b6e43cf662f358788701bb09f84867693f66b2e4db035b92b522a0a775f50b7ecffd6a6d
851380ce17 remove deprecated mentions of signrawtransaction from fundraw help (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
RPC call has been removed as of 0.17.99.
Tree-SHA512: a6a12a0e4572acd9b532c1719be85ed6f29d1c1a28f9ce691398528b8dde4fb4a3222b8f68632fcb1a8eddfe2d31e96d5efd5bc51c041af8e7cb99b61ca3a167
fa5e373365 validation: Add cs_main locking annotations (MarcoFalke)
fa5c346c5a doc: Add comment to cs_main and mempool::cs (MarcoFalke)
fafe941bdd test: Add missing validation locks (MarcoFalke)
fac4558462 sync: Add RecursiveMutex type alias (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Both the chain state and the transaction pool are validation specific, but access to them is protected by two locks. The two locks have the following semantics:
* Writing to the chain state or adding transactions to the transaction pool -> Take both `cs_main` and `mempool::cs`
* Reading either or removing transactions from the the transaction pool -> Take only the appropriate lock
Tree-SHA512: 6f6e612ffc391904c6434a79a4f3f8de1b928bf0a3e3434b73561037b395e2b40a70a5a4bd8472dd230e9eacc8e5d5374c904a3c509910cf3971dd7ff59a626c
fa69ac7614 doxygen: Fix member comments (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Trailing comments must be indicted with the caret `//!<`.
Not all places do this right now, see for example https://dev.visucore.com/bitcoin/doxygen/txmempool_8h.html#a2bc6653552b5871101b6cbefdbaf251f, but they can be fixed with an almost-scripted-diff:
```
sed -i --regexp-extended -e 's/((,|;) *\/\/!) /\1< /g' $(git grep --extended-regexp -l '(,|;)\s*//!\s')
```
(Same as [doxygen] Fix member comments #7793)
Tree-SHA512: 451077008353ccc6fcc795f34094b2d022feb7a171b562a07ba4de0dcb0aebc137e12b03970764bd81e2da386751d042903db4c4831900f43c0cfde804c81b2b
faa1a749428a195af784633eb78e1df5d6a0e875 tx pool: Use class methods to hide raw map iterator impl details (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
ATMP et al would often use map iterator implementation details such as
`end()` or `find()`, which is acceptable in current code.
However, this not only makes it impossible to turn the maps into
private members in the future but also makes it harder to replace the
maps with different data structures.
This is required for and split off of #13804
Tree-SHA512: 4f9017fd1d98d9df49d25bba92655a4a97755eea161fd1cbb565ceb81bbc2b4924129d214f8a29563a77e3d8eef85a67c81245ecdc9a9e5292d419922a93cb88
* refactor/bls: misc refactoring and spelling/grammar fixes in bls code
* refactor/evo: misc refactoring and spelling/grammar fixes in evo code
* refactor: some include changes
* refactor: remove redundant `public`
* fix linter
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Sort includes
* Move `class CTxDSIn;`
* Drop unused functions in CBLSWorker
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
b55555d rpc: Add testmempoolaccept (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
To check if a single raw transaction makes it into the current transaction pool, one had to call `sendrawtransaction`. However, on success, this adds the transaction to the mempool with no easy way to undo.
The call `testmempoolaccept` is introduced to provide a way to solely check the result without changing the mempool state.
Tree-SHA512: 5afd9311190135cee8fc1f229c7d39bf893f1028f29e28d34f70df820198ff97b4bf86b41cbbd6e6c36a5c30073cefa92d541c74a4939c7a2a6fa283dfd41b63
fa5ed4f8d2 refactor: Avoid locking tx pool cs thrice (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`addUnchecked` is (outside the tests) only called by ATMP, which already takes the tx pool read lock. So locking it twice more in both `addUnchecked` methods seems redundant.
Similarly `CalculateMemPoolAncestors` is (beside once in the wallet) only called in contexts, where the tx pool lock is already taken. So remove the lock there as well.
Tree-SHA512: fcf603b570da0fc529fe6db8add218663eae52845510732bee0d4611263d2429d3d3c9c8ae68493d67287d13504500ed51905ccbe711eb15a0af3b019edad543
f77e1d34fd5f17304ce319b5f962b8005592501a test: Add MempoolAncestryTests (Karl-Johan Alm)
a08d76bcfee6f563a268933357931abe32060668 mempool: Calculate descendant maximum thoroughly (Karl-Johan Alm)
6d3568371eb2559d65a3e2334252d36a262319e8 wallet: Switch to using ancestor/descendant limits (Karl-Johan Alm)
6888195b062c8c58dd776fd10b44b25554eb1f15 wallet: Strictly greater than for ancestor caps (Karl-Johan Alm)
322b12ac4e0a8c892e81a760ff7225619248b74f Remove deprecated TransactionWithinChainLimit (Karl-Johan Alm)
47847515473b054929af0c8de3d54b6672500cab Switch to GetTransactionAncestry() in OutputEligibleForSpending (Karl-Johan Alm)
475a385a80198a46a6d99846f99b968f04e9b470 Add GetTransactionAncestry to CTxMemPool for general purpose chain limit checking (Karl-Johan Alm)
46847d69d2c1cc908fd779daac7884e365955dbd mempool: Fix max descendants check (Karl-Johan Alm)
b9ef21dd727dde33f5bd3c33226b05d07eb12aac mempool: Add explicit max_descendants (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
Currently, `TransactionWithinChainLimit` is restricted to single-output use, and needs to be called every time for different limits. If it is replaced with a chain limit value calculator, that can be called once and reused, and is generally more flexible (see e.g. #12257).
Update: this PR now corrects usage of max ancestors / max descendants, including calculating the correct max descendant value, as advertised for the two limits.
~~This change also makes `nMaxAncestors` signed, as the replacement method will return `-1` for "not in the mempool", which is different from "0", which means "no ancestors/descendants in mempool".~~
~~This is a subset of #12257.~~
Tree-SHA512: aa59c849360542362b3126c0e29d44d3d58f11898e277d38c034dc4b86a5b4500f77ac61767599ce878c876b5c446fec9c02699797eb2fa41e530ec863a00cf9
01a06d6686 Avoid locking mutexes that are already held by the same thread (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Avoid locking mutexes that are already held by the same thread. These are reentrant mutexes, but still no need to lock them more than once per thread :-)
Tree-SHA512: e2fb85882e8800892fd8e8170f3c13128d6acfeb14d7b69fb9555f2b7ad0884fb201cf945b8144ffaf6fb1253c28af7c8c6c435319a7ae30ca003f28aa645a98
669c943 Avoid leaking prioritization information when relaying transactions (Suhas Daftuar)
e868b22 fee estimator: avoid sorting mempool on shutdown (Suhas Daftuar)
0975406 Correct mempool mapTx comment (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Following up on #12127 and #12118, this cleans up a comment that was left incorrect in txmempool.h, and addresses a couple of the observations @TheBlueMatt made about an unnecessary use of `queryHashes()` and a small information leak when prioritizing transactions.
Left undone is nuking queryHashes altogether; that would require changing the behavior of the `getrawmempool` rpc call, which I think I might be in favor of doing, but wanted to save for its own PR.
Tree-SHA512: c97d10b96dcd6520459287a4a2eda92774173757695100fcfe61e526aef86f394507c331d17f9e0c14b496c33ec46198a0f165a847762ca50f7c6780b993f162
faca0a8625 doc: Clarify that mempool txiter is const_iterator (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`iterator` and `const_iterator` are the same type for multi indexed transaction sets, but `const_iterator` should be preferred for documentation purposes.
Tree-SHA512: 83e8af36d15aa1e9fc59b3c2279504fd6f6ea3188dc43e36dec279ee0613ff07947d7143fd112bade7868b0dba59ecab3fd246cbde82e376ef965b646d9f8c4d
cbba1d2da4 Add compile time checking for all ::mempool.cs runtime locking assertions (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add compile time checking for `::mempool.cs` runtime locking assertions.
This PR is a subset of #12665. The PR was broken up to make reviewing easier.
The intention is that literally all `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED`/`LOCKS_EXCLUDED`:s added in this PR should follow either directly or indirectly from `AssertLockHeld(…)`/`AssertLockNotHeld(…)`:s already existing in the repo.
Consider the case where function `A(…)` contains `AssertLockHeld(cs_foo)` (without
first locking `cs_foo` in `A`), and that `B(…)` calls `A(…)` (without first locking `cs_main`):
* It _directly_ follows that: `A(…)` should have an `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_foo)` annotation.
* It _indirectly_ follows that: `B(…)` should have an `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_foo)` annotation.
Tree-SHA512: 1b5ec1cfca6be67edd1298fea1a52b5572ce833dd4ad05c4583f753c2d3229402663373675df87e950151d5c41aeb3ee02f0ad935ed83fe2f45ca8e4d55d901e
4d9b4256d8 Fix typos (Dimitris Apostolou)
Pull request description:
Unfortunately I messed up my repo while trying to squash #12593 so I created a PR with just the correct fixes.
Tree-SHA512: 295d77b51bd2a9381f1802c263de7ffb2edd670d9647391e32f9a414705b3c8b483bb0e469a9b85ab6a70919ea13397fa8dfda2aea7a398b64b187f178fe6a06
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
