## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
we should not vote on triggers from the past
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
n/a
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
07ddecb84e6097684fa56cfc79c8c2aad76f6604 refactor: Use [[maybe_unused]] attribute (Hennadii Stepanov)
55e0fc8df9c4045453982888732a0dd7c99ea6d1 refactor: Drop unneeded workarounds aimed to silence unused warning (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This change is required for bitcoin/bitcoin#24773 as it prevents MSVC yelling about "warning C4551: function call missing argument list".
But it is useful by itself as it makes code more concise and readable.
ACKs for top commit:
Empact:
Code review ACK 07ddecb84e6097684fa56cfc79c8c2aad76f6604
laanwj:
Code review ACK 07ddecb84e6097684fa56cfc79c8c2aad76f6604
vincenzopalazzo:
ACK 07ddecb84e
w0xlt:
ACK 07ddecb
Tree-SHA512: 01791855a9ba742202d5718203303af989fcb501b7cf2a24ac8d78e87487acca38f77bef264b8e27e41ad1ccf96e426725cf65bfd96ce2ac71c46b3792bed857
3429d67014095b42a976d95c3ef8622d5fe085e6 init: Prevent -noproxy and -proxy=0 settings from interacting with other settings (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Prevent `-noproxy` and `-proxy=0` settings from interacting with `-listen`, `-upnp`, and `-natpmp` settings.
These settings started being handled inconsistently in the `AppInitMain` and `InitParameterInteraction` functions starting in commit baf05075fa from #6272:
baf05075fa/src/init.cpp (L990-L991)baf05075fa/src/init.cpp (L687)
This commit changes both functions to handle proxy arguments the same way so
there are not side effects from specifying a proxy=0 setting.
This change was originally part of #24830 but really is independent and makes more sense as a separate PR
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 3429d67014095b42a976d95c3ef8622d5fe085e6, tested on Ubuntu 22.04.
Tree-SHA512: c4c6b4aeb3c07321700e974c16fd47a1bd3d469f273a6b308a69638db81c88c4e67208fddc96fcda9c8bd85f3ae22c98ca131c9622895edaa34eb65c194f35db
c71117fcb04fc2e45b5e76fe96b077a07b0c0f82 net: remove non-blocking bool from interface (Bushstar)
Pull request description:
SetSocketNonBlocking was added in 0.11 in the PR below with a second argument to toggle non-blocking mode for the socket. That argument has always been set to true in all subsequent releases and I'm not sure why it is present.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/4491
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK c71117fcb04fc2e45b5e76fe96b077a07b0c0f82.
lsilva01:
Code review ACK c71117fcb0
vasild:
ACK c71117fcb04fc2e45b5e76fe96b077a07b0c0f82
Tree-SHA512: feebfcfa75d997460a0ba42ffe1e0c25a7e0bfcad12510ad73ea4942cc1c653f9ad429adbbb00b9288fe319009552906fcb635a14dfd7dcbde3853baab6be065
a4f4f89815c5aadff51a7a11e0d63caf5212345a Replace uint256 specific implementations of base_uint::GetHex() and base_uint::SetHex() with proper ones that don't depend on uint256 and replace template methods instantiations of base_uint with template class instantiation (Samer Afach)
Pull request description:
The current implementations of `SetHex()` and `GetHex()` in `base_uint` use `arith_uint256`'s implementations. Which means, any attempt to create anything other than `arith_uint256` (say `arith_uint512`) and using any of these functions (which is what I needed in my application) will just not work and will cause compilation errors (besides the immediate linking errors due to templates being in source files instantiated only for 256) because there's no viable conversion from `arith_uint256` and any of the other possible types. Besides that these function will yield wrong results even if the conversion is possible depending on the size. This is fixed in this PR.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK a4f4f89815c5aadff51a7a11e0d63caf5212345a
Tree-SHA512: 92a930fb7ddec5a5565deae2386f7d2d84645f9e8532f8d0c0178367ae081019b32eedcb59cc11028bac0cb15d9883228e016a466b1ee8fc3c6377b4df1d4180
b72925e7cea11522aca65580c136dbacb2753e83 lint: remove qt SIGNAL/SLOT lint (fanquake)
Pull request description:
I think we are past the point where we need to lint for this, the CPU
can probably be better utilized.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK b72925e7cea11522aca65580c136dbacb2753e83
Tree-SHA512: 3da6e4811cdd16ff64c7e26f641f7b24f0405cc86cec36666de58691d447eca8662c924df31c6c60b3523c13590bdc62205a3237b1b1794dd8cdef35519309b3
112a7ab9a8e4c96f5750ac3b929b433d8507354c refactor: remove macOS MAP_ANONYMOUS work around (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This was added to support compilation on macOS 10.10, our minimum
required macOS is now 10.15. macOS has also supported it since 10.11.
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9063.
macOS 12.3 manpage for mmap:
```bash
MAP_ANONYMOUS Synonym for MAP_ANON.
MAP_ANON Map anonymous memory not associated with any specific file.
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 112a7ab9a8e4c96f5750ac3b929b433d8507354c
jarolrod:
ACK 112a7ab9a8e4c96f5750ac3b929b433d8507354c
Tree-SHA512: 920744c755d05d813ab312ff27e42eacb27b1297972800e6fb64bbaad1ea14258751a7dd80c07bfa554a172f36960b26a07505f67e82885253c8bf551073c38e
e8fc236da70085d30c90cdade06edfa1da855a6c refactor: add missing std:: includes to threadnames.cpp (fanquake)
87f3c04cc539c34d32af5fd59abef2c0b5faee26 doc: remove incorrect mention of PR_GET_NAME (fanquake)
Pull request description:
By removing the whole comment. These `#include // For` comments are near impossible
to maintain, pollute diffs, and generally don't add a lot of value.
While here, also add the missing `std::` includes.
ACKs for top commit:
junderw:
LGTM ACK e8fc236
Tree-SHA512: d29aff40c94f59c42f295a5738bc5ff2f4a2f2e6d270cc505f27d56d07d272597e2f8403d72fe45775661e1a1fc2af9fc52aeaeb41263bd3e9dfe255332383c8
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Dead-code, useless conditions can be potential source of bug.
## What was done?
See each particular commit.
This particular commit "fix: check ptr in assert before usage" fixes
potential UB - `assert` is better than UB.
All other commits are not fixing any real issue, just to tidy-up code a
bit or to shut a potential warning.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
f8cba0d9117fe9b9ac51d7044372b28270c7838b test: Change default test logging directory (Yancy Ribbens)
Pull request description:
This PR changes the default test log location request here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17224. Instead of using the location of the makefile [automatic variable](https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Automatic-Variables) `$<` I extract just the basename and then prepend a new location `./test`. This is done because `$<` represents the variable name AND location of the prerequisite here.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: f0fbc530cf0e14c284b4bbf6671c145b1d7a2e1f5561f5c5d09f0cbe88b98e620e763bbbf2dfa9aeeec3dcc9b0127939e105e14c7e4f6660c7c19663622a393d
e7fc50681e99e3c726db2bc4d3d425ed8a0fc6b3 qt: Override BitcoinApplication::event() to handle QEvent::Quit (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
bitcoin-core/gui#336 introduced a regression when termination requests from a platform are not handled properly.
This PR fixes this regression. On macOS shutdown after clicking "Quit" in Dock icon menu, and during logout works again.
Fixes bitcoin-core/gui#545.
ACKs for top commit:
RandyMcMillan:
tACK e7fc50681e99e3c726db2bc4d3d425ed8a0fc6b3
Sjors:
tACK e7fc50681e99e3c726db2bc4d3d425ed8a0fc6b3 (rebased on master) indeed fixes the crash described in #545
promag:
Tested ACK e7fc50681e99e3c726db2bc4d3d425ed8a0fc6b3 on macOS 10.15 with Qt 5.15.2.
Tree-SHA512: 236a483dc0828f22999469e133b8ac9f0b6267ec2a27004c3ebaa967689ddb972ea1fa90c1dd41f3bff3d17bf571a707babcef53bd79fd711fda98cfbf120131
faa7d8a3f7cba02eca7e247108a6b98ea9daf373 util: Add SaturatingAdd helper (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Seems good to have this in the repo, as it might be needed to write cleaner code. For example:
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24090#issuecomment-1019948200
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23418#discussion_r744953272
* ...
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Added a test. Should be trivial to re-ACK with `git range-diff bitcoin-core/master fa90189cbf faa7d8a3f7`
klementtan:
reACK faa7d8a3f7
vasild:
ACK faa7d8a3f7cba02eca7e247108a6b98ea9daf373
Tree-SHA512: d0e6efdba7dfcbdd16ab4539a7f5e45a97d17792e42586c3c52caaae3fc70612dc9e364359658de5de5718fb8c2a765a59ceb2230098355394fa067a9732bc2a
71d33380ed6858b4a65b396332bfb22d984642a6 qt: prevent negative values of progressPerHour (HiLivin)
Pull request description:
Added a similar guard to _progressPerHour_ as is placed at _remainingMSecs_.
It prevents the display of negative values like "-0.00%" in some cases.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 71d33380ed6858b4a65b396332bfb22d984642a6
jarolrod:
ACK 71d3338
shaavan:
reACK 71d33380ed6858b4a65b396332bfb22d984642a6
Tree-SHA512: 5427cdf4441b542196008034355ea00a075adf8b9aeeb383bacdb4e5fbda23d665448a50035aac93cbf401d5d6211d39a2c7c294568d9f5548a5c7579e201c44
faa5e171e6bdb8f3b4027a3f06497f0de5abf766 RPCConsole: Throw when overflowing size_t type for array indices (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
To test:
-> `getblock(getbestblockhash(), 1)[tx][22222222222222222222222222222]`
Before:
<- `868693731dea69a197c13c2cfaa41c9f78fcdeb8ab8e9f8cdf2c9025147ee7d1` (hash of the coinbase tx)
After:
<- `Error: Invalid result query`
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK faa5e171e6bdb8f3b4027a3f06497f0de5abf766
shaavan:
ACK faa5e17
Tree-SHA512: ddff39aae1c15db45928b110a9f1c42eadc5404cdfa89d67ccffc4c6af24091967d43c068ce9e0c1b863cfc4eb5b4f12373a73756a9474f8294e8a44aabc28d8
9bd168bf5457c6fd9770769547d8757bf14813b0 qt: add missing tooltips to options menu settings (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This adds missing tooltips to the text of the `Size of database cache` and the `Number of script verification threads` settings.
All settings in the Options window will now have appropriate tooltip texts.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 9bd168bf5457c6fd9770769547d8757bf14813b0 tested on Debian 5.10.46-4 (2021-08-03)
hebasto:
ACK 9bd168bf5457c6fd9770769547d8757bf14813b0, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (Qt 5.12.8).
Tree-SHA512: d71946bfee33c624a8b79eafe514d2c902090a40bc25097be4c7da4a80270f53305002af1b27d5fd082a0f45f838e22036632f9445918c4b8898073b33c09c08
93cc53a2b27eeb05fe00b8bf17465037815473a1 gui: Unregister wallet notifications before unloading wallets (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change was originally part of both bitcoin/bitcoin#10102 and bitcoin/bitcoin#19101 and is required for both because it avoids the IPC wallet implementation in bitcoin/bitcoin#10102 and the WalletContext implementation in bitcoin/bitcoin#19101 needing to deal with notification objects that have stale pointers to deleted wallets.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 93cc53a2b27eeb05fe00b8bf17465037815473a1.
hebasto:
ACK 93cc53a2b27eeb05fe00b8bf17465037815473a1
Tree-SHA512: 805f50a493291ad0f7c48725fbc5058d58ebbdb0770befd51d8aa241209a13f8a46f5982481336ab8338cdc83e9017668089a71deccf1587308e841cf8697825
87651795d8622d354f8e3c481eb868d9433b841c fuzz: check that ser+unser produces the same AddrMan (Vasil Dimov)
6408b24517f3418e2a408071b4c2ce26571f3167 fuzz: move init code to the CAddrManDeterministic constructor (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Add a fuzz test that fills addrman with a pile of randomly generated addresses, serializes it to a stream, unserializes the stream to another addrman object and compares the two.
Some discussion of this already happened at https://github.com/jnewbery/bitcoin/pull/18.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 87651795d8622d354f8e3c481eb868d9433b841c
jonatack:
ACK 87651795d8622d354f8e3c481eb868d9433b841c rebased to current master, reviewed, fuzz build, ran `FUZZ=addrman_serdeser src/test/fuzz/fuzz`
Tree-SHA512: 7eda79279f14f2649840bf752e575d7b02cbaad541f74f7254855ebd4a32da988f042d78aa9228983350283bb74dd0c71f51f04c0846889c3ba2f19f01a0c303
fadd73037e266edb844f0972e82e9213171ef214 refactor: Remove implicit-integer-sign-change suppressions in validation.cpp (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
A file-wide suppression is problematic because it will wave through future violations, potentially bugs.
Fix that by using per-statement casts.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK fadd73037e266edb844f0972e82e9213171ef214
theStack:
Code-review ACK fadd73037e266edb844f0972e82e9213171ef214
Tree-SHA512: a8a05613be35382b92d7970f958a4e8f4332432056eaa9d72f6719495134b93aaaeea692899d9035654d0e0cf56bcd759671eeeacfd0535582c0ea048ab58a56
33c6a208a9e2512a174c99c224a933a59f091bc2 span, doc: provide span.h context and explain lifetimebound definition (Jon Atack)
d14395bc5db55331115fa3c1e71741d1de7f092f net, doc: provide context for UnserializeV1Array() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Add contextual documentation for developers and future readers of the code regarding
- CNetAddr::UnserializeV1Array (see #22140)
- Span and why it defines Clang lifetimebound locally rather than using the one in attributes.h
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Documentation review ACK 33c6a208a9e2512a174c99c224a933a59f091bc2
Tree-SHA512: cb8e6a6c23b36c9ef7499257e97c5378ec895bb9122b79b63b572d9721a1ae6ce6c0be7ad61bdf976c255527ae750fc9ff4b3e03c07c6c797d14dbc82ea9fb3a
ef72e9bd4124645fe2d00521a71c1c298d760225 doc: nChainTx needs to become a 64-bit earlier due to SegWit (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
As of block 597,379 txcount is 460,596,047 (see `chainparams.cpp`), while `uint32` can handle up to 4,294,967,296.
Pre segwit the [minimum transaction size](https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Maximum_transaction_rate) was 166 bytes, so the worst case number of transactions per block was ~6000. As the original source comment for `unsigned int nChainTx` says, that should last until the year 2030.
With SegWit the smallest possible transaction is 60 bytes (potentially increased to 65 with a future soft fork, see #15482), without a witness:
```
4 bytes version
1 byte input count
36 bytes outpoint
1 byte scriptSigLen (0x00)
0 bytes scriptSig
4 bytes sequence
1 byte output count
8 bytes value
1 byte scriptPubKeyLen
1 byte scriptPubKey (OP_TRUE)
4 bytes locktime
```
That puts the maximum number of transactions per block at 16,666 so we might have to deal with this as early as a block 827,450 in early 2024.
Given that it's a memory-only thing and we want to allow users many years to upgrade, I would suggest fixing this in v0.20 and back-porting it.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
re-ACK ef72e9bd4124645fe2d00521a71c1c298d760225
jarolrod:
ACK ef72e9bd4124645fe2d00521a71c1c298d760225
theStack:
ACK ef72e9bd4124645fe2d00521a71c1c298d760225
Tree-SHA512: d8509ba7641796cd82af156354ff3a12ff7ec0f7b11215edff6696e95f8ca0e3596f719f3492ac3acb4b0884ac4e5bddc76f107b656bc2ed95a8ef1b2b5d4f71
350e034e64d175f3db4c85ddca42e76e279912f6 consensus: don't call GetBlockPos in ReadBlockFromDisk without lock (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Commit ccd8ef65 "Reduce cs_main lock in ReadBlockFromDisk, only read GetBlockPos under the lock" in #11281 moved the cs_main lock from caller to `ReadBlockFromDisk()` for calling `CBlockIndex::GetBlockPos()`, but the second invocation doesn't have the lock, and IIUC there is no guarantee the compiler can know if state has changed.
Use the `blockPos` local variable instead, rename it to `block_pos`, and make it const.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 350e034e64d175f3db4c85ddca42e76e279912f6
theStack:
Code-review ACK 350e034e64d175f3db4c85ddca42e76e279912f6
promag:
Code review ACK 350e034e64d175f3db4c85ddca42e76e279912f6.
Tree-SHA512: 0df0614ab1876885c85f7b53c604a759a29008da8027e95503b4726d2b820ec6d27546020c613337ff954406e01cb5d191978ba4a12124052fed6e1b0e9a226f
317442525586ba9ff8b9af6c506b48f87cd8cd87 Cleanup headers after #20788 (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This is a header cleanup after #20788.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 317442525586ba9ff8b9af6c506b48f87cd8cd87
Tree-SHA512: 1c21b1ba43841880625289174f10e5b333f6eb857f448e1e4114b1ecdf32a6044ec91c5987c1d66806c1d408a4e3d46569eb41d69a0acb8296601d7c203d9f1d
56a42f10f452f0ac0e3e333646a8effcbebf6b30 Stricter BIP32 decoding and test vector 5 (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This adds detection for various edge cases when decoding BIP32 extended pubkeys/privkeys, and tests them using the proposed https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/921 BIP32 test vector 5.
ACKs for top commit:
darosior:
utACK 56a42f10f452f0ac0e3e333646a8effcbebf6b30 -- Had to implement essentially the same fix in python-bip32.
kristapsk:
ACK 56a42f10f452f0ac0e3e333646a8effcbebf6b30. Checked that test vectors are the same as in BIP32 and that tests pass.
Tree-SHA512: 5cc800cc9dc10e43ae89b659ce4f44026d04ec3cabac4eb5122d2e72ec2ed66cd5ace8c7502259e469a9ecaa5ecca2457e55dfe5fedba59948ecbf6673af67a7
fabed982ad9143cddaca8346f6b4c243dd84e0c4 fuzz: Re-enable assert in banman again (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Looks like this was accidentally fixed by removing the buggy code in commit efd6f904c78769ad2e93c1f1de43014d284e7561
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fabed982ad9143cddaca8346f6b4c243dd84e0c4
Tree-SHA512: 2dea5dad48ff2050ae7086c1c6306c40f650e9629918e79adc54164a375d777a70b29f5a480566dc6430f07ce33dfe703fc5d45a20125584b4a026c5832198a2
4a1b2a7ba7f804e656a8cd29d5aa80fcbd40904f [GetTransaction] remove unneeded `cs_main` lock acquire (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a follow-up to #22383. For reading from the mempool, only `mempool.cs` needs to be locked (see [suggestion by MarcoFalke](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22383#discussion_r675069128)):
b620b2d58a/src/txmempool.h (L554-L558)
`CTxMemPool::get()` acquires this lock:
b620b2d58a/src/txmempool.cpp (L822-L829)
so we don't need to acquire any lock ourselves in `GetTransaction()`, as the other functions called in the remaining parts also don't need to have `cs_main` locked.
ACKs for top commit:
tryphe:
Concept ACK. tested 4a1b2a7ba7f804e656a8cd29d5aa80fcbd40904f but not extensively.
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 4a1b2a7ba7f804e656a8cd29d5aa80fcbd40904f
Tree-SHA512: 60e869f72e65cf72cb144be1900ea7f3d87c12f322756994f6a3ed8cd975230b36c7c90c34b60bbf41f9186f4add36decaac1d4f0d0749fb5451b3938a8aa78c
7b3a20b2602f902c344a615f23f8f0280b6f6bcc mempool: apply rule of 5 to epochguard.h, fix compiler warnings (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Apply the rule of five to `src/util/epochguard.h::{Epoch, Marker}` for safety, which also nicely fixes the `-Wdeprecated-copy` compiler warnings with Clang 13.
References:
- https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/rule_of_three
- https://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html#default
- https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#Rc-five
<details><summary>Compiler warnings fixed</summary><p>
```bash
In file included from policy/rbf.cpp:5:
In file included from ./policy/rbf.h:8:
In file included from ./txmempool.h:24:
./util/epochguard.h:53:17: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'Marker' is deprecated because it has a user-declared copy assignment operator [-Wdeprecated-copy]
Marker& operator=(const Marker&) = delete;
^
./txmempool.h:81:7: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'Epoch::Marker' first required here
class CTxMemPoolEntry
^
policy/rbf.cpp:29:29: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'CTxMemPoolEntry' first required here
CTxMemPoolEntry entry = *pool.mapTx.find(tx.GetHash());
```
```bash
In file included from txmempool.cpp:6:
In file included from ./txmempool.h:24:
./util/epochguard.h:53:17: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'Marker' is deprecated because it has a user-declared copy assignment operator [-Wdeprecated-copy]
Marker& operator=(const Marker&) = delete;
^
./txmempool.h:81:7: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'Epoch::Marker' first required here
class CTxMemPoolEntry
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/ext/new_allocator.h:150:23: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'CTxMemPoolEntry' first required here
{ ::new((void *)__p) _Up(std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); }
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/bits/alloc_traits.h:512:8: note: in instantiation of function template specialization '__gnu_cxx::new_allocator<boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::index_node_base<CTxMemPoolEntry, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>>>>>>>::construct<CTxMemPoolEntry, const CTxMemPoolEntry &>' requested here
__a.construct(__p, std::forward<_Args>(__args)...);
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index_container.hpp:655:24: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::null_augment_policy, boost::multi_index::detail::index_node_base<CTxMemPoolEntry, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>>>>>>>>::construct<CTxMemPoolEntry, const CTxMemPoolEntry &>' requested here
node_alloc_traits::construct(
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/detail/index_base.hpp:108:15: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::multi_index::multi_index_container<CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>>::construct_value' requested here
final().construct_value(x,v);
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/detail/ord_index_impl.hpp:770:33: note: (skipping 5 contexts in backtrace; use -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=0 to see all)
final_node_type* res=super::insert_(v,x,variant);
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index_container.hpp:693:33: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256>, boost::multi_index::detail::nth_layer<1, CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>, boost::mpl::vector0<>, boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_unique_tag>::insert_<boost::multi_index::detail::lvalue_tag>' requested here
final_node_type* res=super::insert_(v,x,variant);
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index_container.hpp:705:12: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'boost::multi_index::multi_index_container<CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>>::insert_<boost::multi_index::detail::lvalue_tag>' requested here
return insert_(v,detail::lvalue_tag());
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/detail/index_base.hpp:213:21: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::multi_index::multi_index_container<CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>>::insert_' requested here
{return final().insert_(x);}
^
/usr/include/boost/multi_index/hashed_index.hpp:284:46: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::multi_index::detail::index_base<CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>::final_insert_' requested here
std::pair<final_node_type*,bool> p=this->final_insert_(x);
^
txmempool.cpp:363:53: note: in instantiation of member function 'boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_index<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher, std::equal_to<uint256>, boost::multi_index::detail::nth_layer<1, CTxMemPoolEntry, boost::multi_index::indexed_by<boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<mempoolentry_txid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::hashed_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<index_by_wtxid>, mempoolentry_wtxid, SaltedTxidHasher>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<descendant_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByDescendantScore>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<entry_time>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByEntryTime>, boost::multi_index::ordered_non_unique<boost::multi_index::tag<ancestor_score>, boost::multi_index::identity<CTxMemPoolEntry>, CompareTxMemPoolEntryByAncestorFee>>, std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>, boost::mpl::vector0<>, boost::multi_index::detail::hashed_unique_tag>::insert' requested here
indexed_transaction_set::iterator newit = mapTx.insert(entry).first;
```
```bash
In file included from test/fuzz/policy_estimator.cpp:9:
In file included from ./test/fuzz/util.h:27:
In file included from ./txmempool.h:24:
./util/epochguard.h:53:17: warning: definition of implicit copy constructor for 'Marker' is deprecated because it has a user-declared copy assignment operator [-Wdeprecated-copy]
Marker& operator=(const Marker&) = delete;
^
./txmempool.h:81:7: note: in implicit copy constructor for 'Epoch::Marker' first required here
class CTxMemPoolEntry
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/ext/new_allocator.h:150:23: note: in implicit move constructor for 'CTxMemPoolEntry' first required here
{ ::new((void *)__p) _Up(std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); }
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/bits/alloc_traits.h:512:8: note: in instantiation of function template specialization '__gnu_cxx::new_allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>::construct<CTxMemPoolEntry, CTxMemPoolEntry>' requested here
__a.construct(__p, std::forward<_Args>(__args)...);
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/bits/vector.tcc:115:21: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::allocator_traits<std::allocator<CTxMemPoolEntry>>::construct<CTxMemPoolEntry, CTxMemPoolEntry>' requested here
_Alloc_traits::construct(this->_M_impl, this->_M_impl._M_finish,
^
/usr/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/../../../../include/c++/10/bits/stl_vector.h:1204:9: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::vector<CTxMemPoolEntry>::emplace_back<CTxMemPoolEntry>' requested here
{ emplace_back(std::move(__x)); }
^
test/fuzz/policy_estimator.cpp:49:37: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::vector<CTxMemPoolEntry>::push_back' requested here
mempool_entries.push_back(ConsumeTxMemPoolEntry(fuzzed_data_provider, tx));
```
</p></details>
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7b3a20b2602f902c344a615f23f8f0280b6f6bcc
vasild:
ACK 7b3a20b2602f902c344a615f23f8f0280b6f6bcc
Tree-SHA512: 0406dfcec180152d4f9ed07cbc2f406ad739b41f9c9cb38f8c75159c15d9d8a9a5c7526765966e40d695d265c178f6a80152e7edf82da344a65e55938dddb63d
9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4 tests: Test for dumpwallet lock order issue (Andrew Chow)
25d99e6511d8c43b2025a89bcd8295de755346a7 Reorder dumpwallet so that cs_main functions go first (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
When a wallet is loaded which has an unconfirmed transaction in the mempool, it will end up establishing the lock order of cs_wallet -> cs_main -> cs_KeyStore. If `dumpwallet` is used on this wallet, then a lock order of cs_wallet -> cs_KeyStore -> cs_main will be used, which causes a lock order assertion. This PR fixes this by reordering `dumpwallet` and `GetKeyBirthTimes` (only used by `dumpwallet`). Specifically, in both functions, the function calls which lock cs_main are done prior to locking cs_KeyStore. This avoids the lock order issue.
Additionally, I have added a test case to `wallet_dump.py`. Of course testing this requires `--enable-debug`.
Fixes#22489
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4 🎰
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9b85a5e2f7e003ca8621feaac9bdd304d19081b4. Nice to reduce lock scope, and good test!
prayank23:
tACK 9b85a5e2f7
lsilva01:
Tested ACK 9b85a5e2f7 under the same conditions reported in issue #22489 and the `dumpwallet` command completed successfully.
Tree-SHA512: d370a8f415ad64ee6a538ff419155837bcdbb167e3831b06572562289239028c6b46d80b23d227286afe875d9351f3377574ed831549ea426fb926af0e19c755
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Platform (in the scope of Withdrawals) need to be aware if a tx isn't in
mempool when requesting status of a tx using RPC `gettxchainlocks`.
cc @markin-io
## What was done?
- mempool is passed to `GetTransaction` and saving the result for
checking latter.
- If the returned tx_ref is nullptr, then the RPC returns null for the
corresponding tx in the array.
Example:
`tx1` is mined and chainlocked, `tx2` is in mempool and `tx3` doesn't
exist.
The result now is:
`[
{
"height": 830,
"chainlock": false,
"mempool": true
},
{
"height": -1,
"chainlock": false,
"mempool": true
},
{
"height": -1,
"chainlock": false,
"mempool": false
}
]`
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Platform in the scope of credit withdrawals, need a way to get the
status of an Asset Unlock by index.
## What was done?
A new RPC was created `getassetunlockchainlocks` that accepts Asset
Unlock indexes array as parameter and return corresponding status for
each index.
The possible outcomes per each index are:
- `chainlocked`: If the Asset Unlock index is mined on a Chainlocked
block.
- `mined`: If no Chainlock information is available, and the Asset
Unlock index is mined.
- `mempooled`: If the Asset Unlock index is in the mempool.
- `unknown`: If none of the above are valid.
Note: This RPC is whitelisted for the Platform RPC user.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Inserted on `feature_asset_locks.py` covering cases where Asset Unlock
txs are in mempool, mined and not present.
## Breaking Changes
no
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Cache population for old quorums is a cpu heavy operation and should be
avoided for inactive quorums _at least_ oin `ScanQuorums`. This issue is
critical for testnet and other small network because every mn
participate in almost every platform quorum and cache population for 2
months of quorums can easily block everything for 15+ minutes on a 4 cpu
node. On mainnet quorum distribution is much better but it's still a
small waste of cpu (or not so small for unlucky nodes).
#5761 follow-up
## What was done?
Do not start cache population for outdated quorums, improve logs in
`StartCachePopulatorThread` to make it easier to see what's going on.
## How Has This Been Tested?
run a mn on testnet
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
Impossible to drop it completelly right now because:
- net doesn't know any details about chain - can't check status of fork
- the functional test feature_maxuploadtarget.py assume block size 1Mb
- DIP0001 can't be activated from regtest early block2 because big txes are
not allowed after DIP0001
refactor: drop global variable fDIP0001ActiveAtTip - attempt 2
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
1. `scanQuorumsCache` is a special one and we use it incorrectly.
2. Platform doesn't really use anything that calls `ScanQuorums()`
directly, they specify the exact quorum hash in RPCs so it's
`GetQuorum()` that is used instead. The only place `ScanQuorums()` is
used for Platform related stuff is `StartCleanupOldQuorumDataThread()`
because we want to preserve quorum data used by `GetQuorum()`. But this
can be optimised with its own (much more compact) cache.
3. RPCs that use `ScanQuorums()` should in most cases be ok with smaller
cache, for other use cases there is a note in help text now.
## What was done?
pls see individual commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests, run a node (~in progress~ looks stable)
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`instantlock` and `chainlock` are broken in `getspecialtxes`
kudos to @thephez for finding the issue
## What was done?
pass the hash and also rename the variable to self-describing
## How Has This Been Tested?
run `getspecialtxes` on a node with and without the patch
## Breaking Changes
`instantlock` and `chainlock` will show actual values and not just
`false` all the time now (not sure if that qualifies for "breaking"
though)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Once Platform is live, there could be an edge case where the CL could
arrive to an EvoNode faster through Platform quorum than regular P2P
propagation.
## What was done?
This PR introduces a new RPC `submitchainlock` with the following 3
mandatory parameters:
- `blockHash`, `signature` and `height`.
Besides some basic tests:
- If the block is unknown then the RPC returns an error (could happen if
the node is stucked)
- If the signature is not verified then the RPC return an error.
- If the node already has this CL, the RPC returns true.
- If the node doesn't have this CL, it inserts it, broadcast it through
the inv system and return true.
## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_chainlocks.py` was modified with the following scenario:
1. node0 is isolated from the rest of the network
2. node1 mines a new block and waits for CL
3. Make sure node0 doesn't know the new block/CL (by checking
`getbestchainlock()`)
4. CL is submitted via the new RPC on node0
5. checking `getbestchainlock()` and make sure the CL was processed +
'known_block' is false
6. reconnect node0
## Breaking Changes
no
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
backports cc5a5e81217506ec6f9fff34056290f8f40a7396 only
```
wallet: bugfix, invalid crypted key "checksum_valid" set
At wallet load time, we set the crypted key "checksum_valid" variable always to false.
Which, on every wallet decryption call, forces the process to re-write the entire ckeys to db when
it's not needed.
```
da9caa1cedd69702aea44cb44b2fd0a2d6d56916 Replace fs::absolute calls with AbsPathJoin calls (Kiminuo)
66576c4fd532ac18b8b355ea93d25581a2c15654 test: Clear forced -walletdir setting after wallet init_tests (Kiminuo)
Pull request description:
This adds better test coverage and will make it easier in #20744 to remove our dependency on the two-argument boost::filesystem::absolute() function which does not have a direct equivalent in C++17.
This PR doesn't change behavior aside from adding an assert and fixing a test bug.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Code review ACK da9caa1cedd69702aea44cb44b2fd0a2d6d56916 only doxygen improvements since my last review per `git diff d867d7a da9caa1`
MarcoFalke:
review ACK da9caa1cedd69702aea44cb44b2fd0a2d6d56916 📯
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK da9caa1cedd69702aea44cb44b2fd0a2d6d56916. Just comment and test tweaks since previous review.
Tree-SHA512: c940ee60f3ba374d4927cf34cf12d27c4c735c94af591fbc0ca408c641b30f8f8fbcfe521d66bfbddf9877a1fc8cd99bd8a47ebcd2fa59789de6bd87a7b9cf4d
fd6580e405699ccb051fd2a34525e48d3253673d [refactor] txmempool: split epoch logic into class (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Splits the epoch logic introduced in #17925 into a separate class.
Uses clang's thread safety annotations and encapsulates the data more strongly to reduce chances of bugs from API misuse.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fd6580e405699ccb051fd2a34525e48d3253673d using clang thread safety annotations looks like a very good idea, and the encapsulation this change adds should improve robustness (and possible unit test-ability) of the code. Verified that changing some of the locking duly provoked build-time warnings with Clang 9 on Debian and that small changes in the new `Epoch` class were covered by failing functional test assertions in `mempool_updatefromblock.py`, `mempool_resurrect.py`, and `mempool_reorg.py`
hebasto:
re-ACK fd6580e405699ccb051fd2a34525e48d3253673d, since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18017#pullrequestreview-569619362) review:
Tree-SHA512: 7004623faa02b56639aa05ab7a078320a6d8d54ec62d8022876221e33f350f47df51ddff056c0de5be798f8eb39b5c03c2d3f035698555d70abc218e950f2f8c
3ddbf22ed179a2db733af4b521bec5d2b13ebf4b util: Disallow negative mocktime (MarcoFalke)
f5f2f9716885e7548809e77f46b493c896a019bf net: Avoid UBSan warning in ProcessMessage(...) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Avoid UBSan warning in `ProcessMessage(...)`.
Context: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20380#issuecomment-770427182 (thanks Crypt-iQ!)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 3ddbf22ed179a2db733af4b521bec5d2b13ebf4b only change is adding patch written by me
ajtowns:
ACK 3ddbf22ed179a2db733af4b521bec5d2b13ebf4b -- code review only
Tree-SHA512: e8d7af0457ca86872b75a4e406c0a93aafd841c2962e244e147e748cc7ca118c56be0fdafe53765f4b291410030b2c3cc8f76f733b37a955d34fc885ab6037b9
680eb56d828ce358b4e000c140f5b247ff5e6179 [net processing] Don't pass CConnman to RelayTransactions (John Newbery)
a38a4e8f039dfabfd9435f3a63f1a9b56de086d6 [net processing] Move RelayTransaction into PeerManager (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This is the first part of #21160. It moves the RelayTransaction() function to be a member function of the PeerManager class. This is required in order to move the transaction inventory data into the Peer object, since Peer objects are only accessible from within PeerManager.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 680eb56d828ce358b4e000c140f5b247ff5e6179
Tree-SHA512: 8c93491a4392b6369bb7f090de326a63cd62a088de59026e202f226f64ded50a0cf1a95ed703328860f02a9d2f64d3a87ca1bca9a6075b978bd111d384766235
fa4e088cbac035b8029a10b492849540150d0622 wallet: Mark replaced tx to not be in the mempool anymore (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The wallet does not mark the replaced tx as out-of-mempool. This causes failures in user scripts, because later RPCs may depend on this state change from `bumpfee`.
For example, the following might fail on current master:
```
txid = sendtoaddress(...)
bumpfee(txid)
abandontransaction(txid) # fails because txid is still marked as "in mempool"
```
Fixes#18831
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK fa4e088cbac035b8029a10b492849540150d0622
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa4e088cbac035b8029a10b492849540150d0622, and previous ACK faeedff5c87091fd83d2fb2b29eb49c948363f29 is also still valid in case there's a preference for the original fix
Tree-SHA512: 9858f40f5fb5a43a7b584b5c4268b6befa82e6a84583be5206fe721bcb6c255e8d35479d347d0b9aed72703df49887c02b14ab680e8efdd28b90dd6b93d9439a
1b20109b04061304eab84cf921a030300b4f9fe3 Squashed 'src/leveldb/' changes from f8ae182c1e..330dd6235f (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
A minor change to:
* Consistently use the same symbol names in the whole project.
* Fix compiling with C++20.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa0c32eb74f448c67d0ff9d91dfdd66e2f1e4c48
Tree-SHA512: b5d4540dd621cf4aa8caac811bae03bb74e502a31dbdda9354182e4caa39905550e62ad3cf8ea7d7f9bfc3e5120d119d34ab0f1e633716ec8089876037cbf192
e80259f1976545e4f1ab6a420644be0c32261773 Additionally treat Tx.nVersion as unsigned in joinpsbts (Matt Corallo)
970de70bdd3542e75b73c79b06f143168c361494 Dump transaction version as an unsigned integer in RPC/TxToUniv (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Consensus-wise we already treat it as an unsigned integer (the
only rules around it are in CSV/locktime handling), but changing
the underlying data type means touching consensus code for a
simple cleanup change, which isn't really worth it.
See-also, https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin/pull/299
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK e80259f1976545e4f1ab6a420644be0c32261773
practicalswift:
ACK e80259f1976545e4f1ab6a420644be0c32261773
ajtowns:
ACK e80259f1976545e4f1ab6a420644be0c32261773 code review -- checked all other uses of tx.nVersion treat it as unsigned (except for policy.cpp:IsStandard anyway), so looks good.
naumenkogs:
ACK e80259f
Tree-SHA512: 6760a2c77e24e9e1f79a336ca925f9bbca3a827ce02003c71d7f214b82ed3dea13fa7d9f87df9b9445cd58dff8b44a15571d821c876f22f8e5a372a014c9976b
e66870c5a4c2adbd30dca67d409fd5cd98697587 zmq: Append address to notify log output (nthumann)
241803da211265444e65f254f24dd184f2457fa9 test: Add zmq test to support multiple interfaces (nthumann)
a0b2e5cb6aa8db0563fac7d67a949b9baefe3a25 doc: Add release notes to support multiple interfaces (nthumann)
b1c3f180ecb63f3960506d202feebaa4271058ae doc: Adjust ZMQ usage to support multiple interfaces (nthumann)
347c94f551c3f144c44e00373e4dd61ff6d908b7 zmq: Add support to listen on multiple interfaces (Nicolas Thumann)
Pull request description:
This PR adds support for ZeroMQ to listen on multiple interfaces, just like the RPC server.
Currently, if you specify more than one e.g. `zmqpubhashblock` paramter, only the first one will be used. Therefore a user may be forced to listen on all interfaces (e.g. `zmqpubhashblock=0.0.0.0:28332`), which can result in an increased attack surface.
With this PR a user can specify multiple interfaces to listen on, e.g.
`-zmqpubhashblock=tcp://127.0.0.1:28332 -zmqpubhashblock=tcp://192.168.1.123:28332`.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK e66870c5a4c2adbd30dca67d409fd5cd98697587
instagibbs:
reACK e66870c5a4
Tree-SHA512: f38ab4a6ff00dc821e5f4842508cefadb701e70bb3893992c1b32049be20247c8aa9476a1f886050c5f17fe7f2ce99ee30193ce2c81a7482a5a51f8fc22300c7
090530cc24054d6b4658752bb88f75a3b73eab5d feature: Added ability for users to add a startup command (Ben Carman)
Pull request description:
Thoughts for adding the feature is for users to be able to add things like electrum-personal-server or lnd to run whenever Bitcoin Core is running. Open to feedback about the feature.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 090530cc24
dongcarl:
tACK 090530c
Tree-SHA512: ba514d2fc8b4fb12b781c1a9c89845a25fce0b80ba7c907761cde4abb81edd03fa643682edc895986dc20b273ac3b95769508806db7fbd99ec28623f85c41e67
28b112e9bd3fd1181c0720306051ba7efca8b436 Get rid of BindWallet (Russell Yanofsky)
d002f9d15d938e78360ad906f2d74a249c7e923e Disable CWalletTx copy constructor (Russell Yanofsky)
65b9d8f8ddb5a838454efc8bdd6576f0deb65f6d Avoid copying CWalletTx in LoadToWallet (Russell Yanofsky)
bd2fbc7cdbec46400341209f4cb7e69e5b2cee19 Get rid of unneeded CWalletTx::Init parameter (Russell Yanofsky)
2b9cba206594bfbcefcef0c88a0bf793819643bd Remove CWalletTx merging logic from AddToWallet (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This is a pure refactoring, no behavior is changing.
Instead of AddToWallet taking a temporary CWalletTx object and then potentially merging it with a pre-existing CWalletTx, have it take a callback so callers can update the pre-existing CWalletTx directly.
This makes AddToWallet simpler because now it is only has to be concerned with saving CWalletTx objects and not merging them.
This makes AddToWallet calls clearer because they can now make direct updates to CWalletTx entries without having to make temporary objects and then worry about how they will be merged.
Motivation for this change came from the bumpfee PR #8456 where we wanted to be able to call AddToWallet to make a simple update to an existing transaction, but were reluctant to, because the existing CWalletTx merging logic did not apply and seemed dangerous try to update as part of that PR. After this refactoring, the bumpfee PR could call AddToWallet safely instead of implementing a duplicate AddToWallet function.
This also allows getting rid of the CWalletTx copy constructor to prevent unintentional copying.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Anyway, re-ACK 28b112e9bd3fd1181c0720306051ba7efca8b436
Tree-SHA512: 528dd088714472a237500b200f4433db850bdb7fc29c5e5d81cae48072061dfb967f7c37edd90b33f24901239f9be982988547c1f8c80abc25fb243fbf7330ef
fa47cf9d95dc2c2822fc96df16f179176935bf96 wallet: Fix typo in assert that is compile-time true (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Commit 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37 presumably added a check that a `dest` of type `CNoDestination` implies an empty `scriptChange`.
However, it accidentally checked for `boost::variant::empty`, which always returns false: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_72_0/doc/html/boost/variant.html#id-1_3_46_5_4_1_1_16_2-bb
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK fa47cf9d95dc2c2822fc96df16f179176935bf96
Tree-SHA512: 9626b1e2947039853703932a362c2ee204e002d3344856eb93eef0e0f833401336f2dfa80fd43b83c8ec6eac624e6302aee771fb67aec436ba6483be02b8d615
92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37 [wallet] allow transaction without change if keypool is empty (Sjors Provoost)
709f8685ac37510aa145ac259753583c82280038 [wallet] CreateTransaction: simplify change address check (Sjors Provoost)
5efc25f9638866941028454cfa9bae27f1519cb4 [wallet] translate "Keypool ran out" message (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Extracted from #16944
First this PR simplifies the check when generating a change address, by dropping `CanGetAddresses` and just letting `reservedest.GetReservedDestination` do this check.
Second, when the keypool is empty, instead of immediately giving up, we create a dummy change address and pass that to coin selection. If we didn't need the change address (e.g. when spending the entire balance), then it's all good. If we did need a change address, we throw the original error.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37
jonasschnelli:
utACK 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37
achow101:
ACK 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 92bcd70808b9cac56b184903aa6d37baf9641b37
Tree-SHA512: 07b8c8251f57061c58a85ebf0359be63583c23bac7a2c4cefdc14820c0cdebcc90a2bb218e5ede0db11d1e204cda149e056dfd18614642070b3d56efe2735006
fa60afc4fb957875bab1c8982d9d9e4999a3814c wallet: Add BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain to dumpwallet (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
dumpwallet includes the block hash in the output, so this method depends on the chainstate. According to the developer notes e84a5f0004/doc/developer-notes.md (L1095) it must include a `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain`.
This is a minor fix and does not need backport, I think.
It fixes test failures such as https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/675487097#L2657 , which can only happen in master because the test was not backported.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK fa60afc4fb957875bab1c8982d9d9e4999a3814c.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa60afc4fb957875bab1c8982d9d9e4999a3814c
meshcollider:
utACK fa60afc4fb957875bab1c8982d9d9e4999a3814c
Tree-SHA512: 8df70b06b226b2cdf880dec9264adb72d66fd81b09b404fd1665a79e5f5236d26122eebf15df00fe71ee292b5c91b2dc23a0a42b2aa50a8d690604b23832723f
Some changes are missing or incorrectly backported during CWallet refactoring in #17260, #17261 such as:
- Missing changes for CWallet::GetOldestKeyPoolTime
- useless check of spk_man existance in getnewaddress
- GetHDChain is used assuming it exists only legacy keymanager
- using internal spk_man API instead wallet's in getwalletinfo
facef3d4131f9980a4516282f11731361559509c doc: Explain that anyone can work on good first issues, move text to CONTRIBUTING.md (MarcoFalke)
fae2fb2a196ee864e9a13fffc24a0279cd5d17e6 doc: Expand section on Getting Started (MarcoFalke)
100000d1b2c2e38d7a14a31b0af79e0e4316b04c doc: Add headings to CONTRIBUTING.md (MarcoFalke)
fab893e0caf510d4836a20194892ef9c71426c51 doc: Fix unrelated typos reported by codespell (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Some random doc changes:
* Add sections to docs, so that they can be linked to
* Explain that anyone (even maintainers) are allowed to work on good first issues
* Expand section on Getting Started slightly
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK facef3d4131f9980a4516282f11731361559509c
fanquake:
ACK facef3d4131f9980a4516282f11731361559509c
Tree-SHA512: 8998e273a76dbf4ca77e79374c14efe4dfcc5c6df6b7d801e1e1e436711dbe6f76b436f9cbc6cacb45a56827babdd6396f3bd376a9426ee7be3bb9b8a3b8e383
aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0 scripted-diff: Bump copyright of files changed in 2019 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0
promag:
ACK aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0 🎉
fanquake:
ACK aaaaad6ac95b402fe18d019d67897ced6b316ee0 - going to merge this now because the year is over and conflicts are minimal.
Tree-SHA512: 58cb1f53bc4c1395b2766f36fabc7e2332e213780a802762fff0afd59468dad0c3265f553714d761c7a2c44ff90f7dc250f04458f4b2eb8eef8b94f8c9891321
0000ea32656833efa3d2ffd9bab66c88c83334f0 test: Add test for GetRandMillis and GetRandMicros (MarcoFalke)
fa0e5b89cf742df56c6c8f49fe9b3c54d2970a66 Add templated GetRandomDuration<> (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
A naive implementation of this template is dangerous, because the call site might accidentally omit the template parameter:
```cpp
template <typename D>
D GetRandDur(const D& duration_max)
{
return D{GetRand(duration_max.count())};
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(util_time_GetRandTime)
{
std::chrono::seconds rand_hour = GetRandDur(std::chrono::hours{1});
// Want seconds to be in range [0..1hour), but always get zero :((((
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(rand_hour.count(), 0);
}
```
Luckily `std::common_type` is already specialised in the standard lib for `std::chrono::duration` (https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/chrono/duration/common_type). And its effect seem to be that the call site must always specify the template argument explicitly.
So instead of implementing the function for each duration type by hand, replace it with a templated version that is safe to use.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 0000ea32656833efa3d2ffd9bab66c88c83334f0
promag:
Code review ACK 0000ea32656833efa3d2ffd9bab66c88c83334f0.
jonatack:
ACK 0000ea3 thanks for the improved documentation. Code review, built, ran `src/test/test_bitcoin -t random_tests -l test_suite` for the new unit tests, `git diff fa05a4c 0000ea3` since previous review:
hebasto:
ACK 0000ea32656833efa3d2ffd9bab66c88c83334f0 with non-blocking [nit](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18781#discussion_r424924671).
Tree-SHA512: e89d46e31452be6ea14269ecbbb2cdd9ae83b4412cd14dff7d1084283092722a2f847cb501e8054394e4a3eff852f9c87f6d694fd008b3f7e8458cb5a3068af7
9f59dde9740d065118bdddde75ef9f4e4603a7b1 rpc: Relock wallet only if most recent callback (João Barbosa)
a2e6db5c4f1bb52a8814102b628e51652493d06a rpc: Add mutex to guard deadlineTimers (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes an early relocking race condition from #18811 where old relock callback runs after new wallet unlock code and nRelockTime update but before rpcRunLater call, causing early relock and incorrect nRelockTime time
Issue introduced in #18487.
Fixes#18811.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 9f59dde9740d065118bdddde75ef9f4e4603a7b1
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9f59dde9740d065118bdddde75ef9f4e4603a7b1. No changes since last review except squashing commits.
jonatack:
ACK 9f59dde9740d065118bdddde75ef
Tree-SHA512: 2f7fc03e5ab6037337f2d82dfad432495cc337c77d07c968ee2355105db6292f24543c03456f5402e0e759577a4327758f9372f7ea29de6d56dc3695fda9b379
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Now that we have ChainLock sigs in coinbase `VerifyDB()` have to process
them. It works most of the time because usually we simply read
contributions from quorum db
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/src/llmq/quorums.cpp#L385.
However, sometimes these contributions aren't available so we try to
re-build them
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/src/llmq/quorums.cpp#L388.
But by the time we call `VerifyDB()` bls worker threads aren't started
yet, so we keep pushing jobs into worker's queue but it can't do
anything and it halts everything.
backtrace:
```
* frame #0: 0x00007fdd85a2873d libc.so.6`syscall at syscall.S:38
frame #1: 0x0000555c41152921 dashd_testnet`std::__atomic_futex_unsigned_base::_M_futex_wait_until(unsigned int*, unsigned int, bool, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1l> >, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1000000000l> >) + 225
frame #2: 0x0000555c40e22bd2 dashd_testnet`CBLSWorker::BuildQuorumVerificationVector(Span<std::shared_ptr<std::vector<CBLSPublicKey, std::allocator<CBLSPublicKey> > > >, bool) at atomic_futex.h:102:36
frame #3: 0x0000555c40d35567 dashd_testnet`llmq::CQuorumManager::BuildQuorumContributions(std::unique_ptr<llmq::CFinalCommitment, std::default_delete<llmq::CFinalCommitment> > const&, std::shared_ptr<llmq::CQuorum> const&) const at quorums.cpp:419:65
frame #4: 0x0000555c40d3b9d1 dashd_testnet`llmq::CQuorumManager::BuildQuorumFromCommitment(Consensus::LLMQType, gsl::not_null<CBlockIndex const*>) const at quorums.cpp:388:37
frame #5: 0x0000555c40d3c415 dashd_testnet`llmq::CQuorumManager::GetQuorum(Consensus::LLMQType, gsl::not_null<CBlockIndex const*>) const at quorums.cpp:588:37
frame #6: 0x0000555c40d406a9 dashd_testnet`llmq::CQuorumManager::ScanQuorums(Consensus::LLMQType, CBlockIndex const*, unsigned long) const at quorums.cpp:545:64
frame #7: 0x0000555c40937629 dashd_testnet`llmq::CSigningManager::SelectQuorumForSigning(Consensus::LLMQParams const&, llmq::CQuorumManager const&, uint256 const&, int, int) at signing.cpp:1038:90
frame #8: 0x0000555c40937d34 dashd_testnet`llmq::CSigningManager::VerifyRecoveredSig(Consensus::LLMQType, llmq::CQuorumManager const&, int, uint256 const&, uint256 const&, CBLSSignature const&, int) at signing.cpp:1061:113
frame #9: 0x0000555c408e2d43 dashd_testnet`llmq::CChainLocksHandler::VerifyChainLock(llmq::CChainLockSig const&) const at chainlocks.cpp:559:53
frame #10: 0x0000555c40c8b09e dashd_testnet`CheckCbTxBestChainlock(CBlock const&, CBlockIndex const*, llmq::CChainLocksHandler const&, BlockValidationState&) at cbtx.cpp:368:47
frame #11: 0x0000555c40cf75db dashd_testnet`ProcessSpecialTxsInBlock(CBlock const&, CBlockIndex const*, CMNHFManager&, llmq::CQuorumBlockProcessor&, llmq::CChainLocksHandler const&, Consensus::Params const&, CCoinsViewCache const&, bool, bool, BlockValidationState&, std::optional<MNListUpdates>&) at specialtxman.cpp:202:60
frame #12: 0x0000555c40c00a47 dashd_testnet`CChainState::ConnectBlock(CBlock const&, BlockValidationState&, CBlockIndex*, CCoinsViewCache&, bool) at validation.cpp:2179:34
frame #13: 0x0000555c40c0e593 dashd_testnet`CVerifyDB::VerifyDB(CChainState&, CChainParams const&, CCoinsView&, CEvoDB&, int, int) at validation.cpp:4789:41
frame #14: 0x0000555c40851627 dashd_testnet`AppInitMain(std::variant<std::nullopt_t, std::reference_wrapper<NodeContext>, std::reference_wrapper<WalletContext>, std::reference_wrapper<CTxMemPool>, std::reference_wrapper<ChainstateManager>, std::reference_wrapper<CBlockPolicyEstimator>, std::reference_wrapper<LLMQContext> > const&, NodeContext&, interfaces::BlockAndHeaderTipInfo*) at init.cpp:2098:50
frame #15: 0x0000555c4082fe11 dashd_testnet`AppInit(int, char**) at bitcoind.cpp:145:54
frame #16: 0x0000555c40823c64 dashd_testnet`main at bitcoind.cpp:173:20
frame #17: 0x00007fdd85934083 libc.so.6`__libc_start_main(main=(dashd_testnet`main at bitcoind.cpp:160:1), argc=3, argv=0x00007ffcb8ca5b88, init=<unavailable>, fini=<unavailable>, rtld_fini=<unavailable>, stack_end=0x00007ffcb8ca5b78) at libc-start.c:308:16
frame #18: 0x0000555c4082f27e dashd_testnet`_start + 46
```
Fixes#5741
## What was done?
Start LLMQContext early. Alternative solution could be moving bls worker
Start/Stop into llmq context ctor/dtor.
## How Has This Been Tested?
I had a node with that issue. This patch fixed it.
## Breaking Changes
Not sure, hopefully none.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Missing changes in https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5736
The prior backport of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19438 has
been needed to this particular changes: drop the mutex `cs_llmq_vbc`.
This mutex can potentially cause deadlock such as:
```
'cs_dip3list' in qt/masternodelist.cpp:135 (TRY) (in thread 'main')
(2) 'cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/utils.cpp:704 (in thread 'main')
'm_mutex' in versionbits.cpp:253 (in thread 'main')
(1) 'cs_main' in node/blockstorage.cpp:77 (in thread 'main')
Current lock order is:
'cs_Shutdown' in init.cpp:220 (TRY) (in thread 'shutoff')
(1) 'cs_main' in init.cpp:328 (in thread 'shutoff')
(2) 'llmq::cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/context.cpp:64 (in thread 'shutoff')
Assertion failed: detected inconsistent lock order for 'llmq::cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/context.cpp:64 (in thread 'shutoff'), details in debug log.
```
## What was done?
Drop `cs_llmq_vbc` mutex from llmq/utils
## How Has This Been Tested?
Re-started app several times -> no other deadlock happens.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
When DKG data recovery is triggered by `qgetdata` the data we use to
construct `qdata` reply is actually the one handled by
`CDKGSessionManager`, not by `CQuorumManager`. Not storing the data long
enough in `CDKGSessionManager` will result in this data simply not being
recoverable.
Also, the formula in `CDKGSessionManager::CleanupOldContributions()` is
broken for quorums which use rotation (the depth is way too large).
## What was done?
Fix both issues by redefining `keepOldKeys` and aligning key storage
depths in both modules.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Fixes a bug we missed in #5736
## What was done?
Use all collected indexes, not just the last one
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
facd56750c8a6aee88eeef75d8c8233778d35757 scripted-diff: Revert "fuzz: Add Temporary debug assert for oss-fuzz issue" (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
No longer needed, as it wouldn't help to debug this issue. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22472#issuecomment-882692900
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK facd56750c8a6aee88eeef75d8c8233778d35757
Tree-SHA512: 13352b3529c43d6e65ab127134b32158d3072dc2fbbb326fea9adfeada5a8610d0477ea75748b8b68e7abb3b9869a989df3a3169e92bdd458053d64bae6ed379
7ad414f4bfa74595ee5726e66f3527045c02a977 doc: add comment about CCoinsViewDBCursor constructor (James O'Beirne)
0f8a5a4dd530549d37c43da52c923ac3b2af1a03 move-only(ish): don't expose CCoinsViewDBCursor (James O'Beirne)
615c1adfb07b9b466173166dc2e53ace540e4b32 refactor: wrap CCoinsViewCursor in unique_ptr (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
I tripped over this one for a few hours at the beginning of the week, so I've sort of got a personal vendetta against `CCoinsView::Cursor()` returning a raw pointer.
Specifically in the case of CCoinsViewDB, if a raw cursor is allocated and not freed, a cryptic leveldb assertion failure occurs on CCoinsViewDB destruction (`Assertion 'dummy_versions_.next_ == &dummy_versions_' failed.`).
This is a pretty simple change.
Related to: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21766
See also: https://github.com/google/leveldb/issues/142#issuecomment-414418135
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 7ad414f4bfa74595ee5726e66f3527045c02a977 🔎
jonatack:
re-ACK 7ad414f4bfa74595ee5726e66f3527045c02a977 modulo suggestion
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7ad414f4bfa74595ee5726e66f3527045c02a977. Two new commits look good and thanks for clarifying constructor comment
Tree-SHA512: 6471d03e2de674d84b1ea0d31e25f433d52aa1aa4996f7b4aab1bd02b6bc340b15e64cc8ea07bbefefa3b5da35384ca5400cc230434e787c30931b8574c672f9
faf1af58f85da74f94c6b5f6910c7faf7b47cc88 fuzz: Add Temporary debug assert for oss-fuzz issue (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
oss-fuzz is acting weird, so add an earlier assert to help troubleshooting
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faf1af58f85da74f94c6b5f6910c7faf7b47cc88
Tree-SHA512: 85830d7d47cf6b4edfe91a07bd5aa8f7110db0bade8df93868cf276ed04d5dd17e671f769e6a0fb5092012b86aa82bb411fb171411f15746981104ce634c88c1
91ef8344d4de28b0a659401ef5fefee6c3d9f7ae Additional test vector for hardened derivation with leading zeros (Kristaps Kaupe)
Pull request description:
See [Inconsistent BIP32 Derivations](https://blog.polychainlabs.com/bitcoin,/bip32,/bip39,/kdf/2021/05/17/inconsistent-bip32-derivations.html) and https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1030.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 91ef8344d4de28b0a659401ef5fefee6c3d9f7ae
sipa:
ACK 91ef8344d4de28b0a659401ef5fefee6c3d9f7ae. Verified that it matches the linked BIP32 update, and that it indeed tests derivation from a private key with leading 0 byte.
Tree-SHA512: 0a3ae7aed15e4e08e9bec5db8de53c6c03ed3b3632f390394eea422597755173cbd2228ff0cfa57f5aae3df9d4cdf03a8ef4725cc8bce86ab7d9c82ab9d479ad
4935ac583bbdc289dd31a1caae3d711edef742b6 qt: Improve GUI responsiveness (Hennadii Stepanov)
75850106aeecfed1d2dc16d8a67ec210c5826a47 qt, macos: Fix GUIUtil::PolishProgressDialog bug (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
[`QProgressDialog`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qprogressdialog.html) estimates the time the operation will take (based on time for steps), and only shows itself if that estimate is beyond [`minimumDuration`](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qprogressdialog.html#minimumDuration-prop).
The default `minimumDuration` value is [4 seconds](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qprogressdialog.html#details), and it could make users think that the GUI is frozen.
This PR sets `minimumDuration` to zero for all progress dialogs, that affects ones in the `WalletControllerActivity` class.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 4935ac583bbdc289dd31a1caae3d711edef742b6. I'm not very familiar with this API but all the changes and explanations make sense and are very clear, and this seems like it should be an improvement.
promag:
Code review ACK 4935ac583bbdc289dd31a1caae3d711edef742b6.
jarolrod:
ACK 4935ac583bbdc289dd31a1caae3d711edef742b6
Tree-SHA512: 2ddd74e7fd87894d341d2439dbaa544d031a350f7f57d4c7e9fbba977dc24080fe60fd7a80a542b1647f1de9091d7fd04a36eab695088d4d75fb836548e99b5f
e286cd0d7b4e12c8efe5e7ac3066a100e0ba2c0a net: flag relevant Sock methods with [[nodiscard]] (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Flag relevant Sock methods with `[[nodiscard]]` to avoid issues like the one fixed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21631.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK e286cd0d7b4e12c8efe5e7ac3066a100e0ba2c0a: the only changes made are additions of `[[nodiscard]]` and `(void)` where appropriate
laanwj:
Code review ACK e286cd0d7b4e12c8efe5e7ac3066a100e0ba2c0a
Tree-SHA512: addc361968d24912bb625b42f4db557791556bf0ffad818252a89a32d76ac22758ec70f8282dcfbfd77eebec20a8e6bb7557c8ed08d50a58de95378c34955973
105941b726c078642e785ecb7b6834ba814381b0 net: use stronger AddLocal() for our I2P address (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
There are two issues:
### 1. Our I2P address not added to local addresses.
* `externalip=` is used with an IPv4 address (this sets automatically `discover=0`)
* No `discover=1` is used
* `i2psam=` is used
* No `externalip=` is used for our I2P address
* `listenonion=1 torcontrol=` are used
In this case `AddLocal(LOCAL_MANUAL)` [is used](94f83534e4/src/torcontrol.cpp (L354)) for our `.onion` address and `AddLocal(LOCAL_BIND)` [for our](94f83534e4/src/net.cpp (L2247)) `.b32.i2p` address, the latter being [ignored](94f83534e4/src/net.cpp (L232-L233)) due to `discover=0`.
### 2. Our I2P address removed from local addresses even if specified with `externalip=` on I2P proxy restart.
* `externalip=` is used with our I2P address (this sets automatically `discover=0`)
* No `discover=1` is used
* `i2psam=` is used
In this case, initially `externalip=` causes our I2P address to be [added](94f83534e4/src/init.cpp (L1266)) with `AddLocal(LOCAL_MANUAL)` which overrides `discover=0` and works as expected. However, if later the I2P proxy is shut down [we do](94f83534e4/src/net.cpp (L2234)) `RemoveLocal()` in order to stop advertising our I2P address (since we have lost I2P connectivity). When the I2P proxy is started and we reconnect to it, restoring the I2P connectivity, [we do](94f83534e4/src/net.cpp (L2247)) `AddLocal(LOCAL_BIND)` which does nothing due to `discover=0`.
To resolve those two issues, use `AddLocal(LOCAL_MANUAL)` for I2P which is also what we do with Tor.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 105941b726c078642e785ecb7b6834ba814381b0
Tree-SHA512: 0c9daf6116b8d9c34ad7e6e9bbff6e8106e94e4394a815d7ae19287aea22a8c7c4e093c8dd8c58a4a1b1412b2575a9b42b8a93672c8d17f11c24508c534506c7
36fb036d25e2a3016b36873456e5a9e6251ffef8 p2p: allow NetPermissions::ClearFlag() only with PF_ISIMPLICIT (Jon Atack)
4e0d5788ba5771c81bc0ff2e6523cf9accddae46 test: add net permissions noban/download unit test coverage (Jon Atack)
dde69f20a01acca64ac21cb13993c6e4f8709f23 p2p, bugfix: use NetPermissions::HasFlag() in CConnman::Bind() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is a bugfix follow-up to #16248 and #19191 that was noticed in #21506. Both v0.21 and master are affected.
Since #19191, noban is a multi-flag that implies download, so the conditional in `CConnman::Bind()` using a bitwise AND on noban will return the same result for both the noban status and the download status. This means that download peers are incorrectly not being added to local addresses because they are mistakenly seen as noban peers.
The second commit adds unit test coverage to illustrate and test the noban/download relationship and the `NetPermissions` operations involving them.
The final commit adds documentation and disallows calling `NetPermissions::ClearFlag()` with any second param other than `NetPermissionFlags` "implicit" -- per current usage in the codebase -- because `ClearFlag()` should not be called with any second param that is a subflag of a multiflag, e.g. "relay" or "download," as that would leave the result in an invalid state corresponding to none of the existing NetPermissionFlags. Thanks to Vasil Dimov for noticing this.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK 36fb036d25e2a3016b36873456e5a9e6251ffef8 ☕
vasild:
ACK 36fb036d25e2a3016b36873456e5a9e6251ffef8
hebasto:
ACK 36fb036d25e2a3016b36873456e5a9e6251ffef8, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
kallewoof:
Code review ACK 36fb036d25e2a3016b36873456e5a9e6251ffef8
Tree-SHA512: 5fbc7ddbf31d06b35bf238f4d77ef311e6b6ef2e1bb9893f32f889c1a0f65774a3710dcb21d94317fe6166df9334a9f2d42630809e7fe8cbd797dd6f6fc49491
f2f2541ee7ad36191515ff351b667fe12a2ab871 remove executable flag for src/net_processing.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The file permissions for `src/net_processing.cpp` have been changed in #21713, as discovered by fanquake (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21713#issuecomment-822245960). This PR removes the executable flag again.
ACKs for top commit:
kiminuo:
ACK f2f2541ee7ad36191515ff351b667fe12a2ab871 :)
jnewbery:
ACK f2f2541ee7ad36191515ff351b667fe12a2ab871
promag:
ACK f2f2541ee7ad36191515ff351b667fe12a2ab871.
Tree-SHA512: 1d5a62afb1152029e69fccea2ae53dcb262a91724a5c03dfc4de8c409b280814d0c211c2f9a71f1a6e927f4ed571ba4ac311de9de8ebb797eaf1051674241bdb
7f3a5980c1d54988a707b961fd2ef647cebb4c5b qt: Do not use QClipboard::Selection on Windows and macOS. (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Windows and macOS do [not support](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qclipboard.html#notes-for-windows-and-macos-users) the global mouse selection.
Fixes#258.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 7f3a5980c1d54988a707b961fd2ef647cebb4c5b.
jarolrod:
ACK 7f3a5980c1d54988a707b961fd2ef647cebb4c5b
Tree-SHA512: be2beeef7d25af6f4d4a4548325d8d29f08e4342f499666bc4a670ed468a63195d514077c2cd0dba197e12bd43316fd3e2813cdc0954364b6aa4ae6b90c118bf
732c7bddeb9cd4e9fe80ebb7ee98d0f9fcc6a9d3 tests: Add test for CNetAddr::ToString IPv6 address formatting (RFC 5952) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Test that `CNetAddr::ToString` formats IPv6 addresses with zero compression and canonicalisation as described in [RFC 5952 ("A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation")](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5952).
Solving #21466 will hopefully be trivial with the ability to check zero compression correctness against these tests.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 732c7bddeb9cd4e9fe80ebb7ee98d0f9fcc6a9d3
Tree-SHA512: 31a1378aa435ba4171490a2e15d7280a175292270eb001b47d367e010c6ac9b83420b82bbeab22211f8f500c69e21878047c87adf216263b3420b6bb2a5d2bfb
55554463c15e3c75a64d26209dd3f8396e508cc2 fuzz: Use ConsumeWeakEnum in addrman for service flags (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This has minimally better performance. Reported by me in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20228#discussion_r598081787
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
Tested ACK 55554463c15e3c75a64d26209dd3f8396e508cc2
vasild:
ACK 55554463c15e3c75a64d26209dd3f8396e508cc2
Tree-SHA512: 4e5f51fe4f2bd7b2f37d0690e41203341ba45c0c9bc9247449cd26cfb5f77dc2ec61df3e4963276f68694e4b3ca3d0a76367a51c4d775501edeb3224d305a261
e21276a82a9996c73e43990ccf927397f71399ea qt test: Don't bind to regtest port (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The qt tests don't need to bind to the regtest port. By not binding, it will no longer conflict with existing regtest instances and the tests will run as normal.
Fixes#10
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK e21276a82a9996c73e43990ccf927397f71399ea
jarolrod:
re-ACK e21276a82a9996c73e43990ccf927397f71399ea, tested on macOS 11.2
Tree-SHA512: 5a269ee043f9aff7900e092c166de71912a2bf86ebe2982b3fb0e26bdebfb91869ee5d0f62082fd608c1288bfb7981f6c8647e504b11176711d7fec993a09164
0c471a5f306044cbd2eb230714571f05dd6aaf3c tests: check never active versionbits (Anthony Towns)
3ba9283a47ac358168db9db7840ae559f443486c tests: more helpful errors for failing versionbits tests (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Extracted from #19573 to make review easier. I also reviewed it myself.
I added some comments to the test: bae9a45219 (r585486781)
I also moved some `TestState` changes from the second to the first commit, to reduce the latter diff.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 0c471a5f306044cbd2eb230714571f05dd6aaf3c
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 0c471a5f306044cbd2eb230714571f05dd6aaf3c 🔓
Tree-SHA512: 61f8d1ecaf38a6cd13db1cf71c89b8c4d2f5852ef77c5e7ecb9bd78eb216545037411641bb101cf0740c5c47845ac327954ee25b676d63779c5f148719ac5caf
fa59ad5130d732027d01b8aac04b88326b81ac5b fuzz: Add missing include (test/util/setup_common.h) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`src/test/fuzz/socks5.cpp` is using the symbol `BasicTestingSetup`, which is defined in `src/test/util/setup_common.h`.
Currently compilation happens to succeed because the needed dependency is indirectly included. Compilation will break as soon as the indirect dependency is broken. According to the dev notes, everything that is used must be included.
Fix the issue by including the missing include.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa59ad5130d732027d01b8aac04b88326b81ac5b
Tree-SHA512: 9359d5d288ebc5a53d753ebed1ee8d49ddcfe12aeb56054ea43654c0d915337bb0dce7c8a7178e94711ff8dacd1b3ea0a2871b21b1709cd9786efc0c1ef532b3
9bac71350d98580cc7441957fc7c3fa2f4158553 build: make HAVE_O_CLOEXEC available outside LevelDB (bugfix) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
584fd91d2d294883e6896dbd64a2176528e94581 init: only use pipe2 if availabile, check in configure (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The result of the O_CLOEXEC availability check is currently only set in the Makefile and passed to LevelDB (see `LEVELDB_CPPFLAGS_INT` in `src/Makefile.leveldb.include`), but not defined to be used in our codebase. This means that code within the preprocessor conditional `#if HAVE_O_CLOEXEC` was actually never compiled. On the master branch this is currently used for pipe creation in `src/shutdown.cpp`, PR #21007 moves this part to a new module (I found the issue while testing that PR).
The fix is similar to the one in #19803, which solved the same problem for HAVE_FDATASYNC.
In the course of working on the PR it turned out that pipe2 is not available an all platforms, hence a configure check and a corresponding define HAVE_PIPE2 is introduced and used.
The PR can be tested by anyone with a system that has pipe2 and O_CLOEXEC available by putting gibberish into the HAVE_O_CLOEXEC block: on master, everything should compile fine, on PR, the compiler should abort with an error. At least that's my naive way of testing preprocessor logic, happy to hear more sophisticated ways :-)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 9bac71350d98580cc7441957fc7c3fa2f4158553
Tree-SHA512: aec89faf6ba52b6f014c610ebef7b725d9e967207d58b42a4a71afc9f1268fcb673ecc85b33a2a3debba8105a304dd7edaba4208c5373fcef2ab83e48a170051
25f899cc23a791c08e19acae91bebda6c3538d37 log: Move "Pre-allocating up to position 0x[...] in [...].dat" log message to debug category (practicalswift)
acd7980b37b5a71f324f7772d72175c8bd7ab900 log: Move "Leaving block file [...]: [...]" log message to debug category (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Move `Pre-allocating up to position 0x[…] in […].dat` log message to debug category.
After the cleanup of `-debug=net` log messages PR (#20724) was merged recently the console log now has very high signal to noise ratio. That's great! :)
This PR increases the signal to noise ratio slightly more by moving the most common remaining implementation detail log message (`Pre-allocating up to position 0x[…] in […].dat`) to the debug category where it belongs :)
Expected standard output from `bitcoind` (when in steady state) before this patch:
```
$ src/bitcoind
…
0000-00-00T00:00:00Z UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 height=000000 version=0x00000000 log0_work=00.000000 tx=000000000 date='0000-00-00T00:00:00Z' progress=0.000000 cache=000.0MiB(0000000txo)
0000-00-00T00:00:00Z UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 height=000000 version=0x00000000 log0_work=00.000000 tx=000000000 date='0000-00-00T00:00:00Z' progress=0.000000 cache=000.0MiB(0000000txo)
0000-00-00T00:00:00Z Pre-allocating up to position 0x0000000 in blk00000.dat
0000-00-00T00:00:00Z Pre-allocating up to position 0x000000 in rev00000.dat
0000-00-00T00:00:00Z UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 height=000000 version=0x00000000 log0_work=00.000000 tx=000000000 date='0000-00-00T00:00:00Z' progress=0.000000 cache=000.0MiB(0000000txo)
0000-00-00T00:00:00Z UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 height=000000 version=0x00000000 log0_work=00.000000 tx=000000000 date='0000-00-00T00:00:00Z' progress=0.000000 cache=000.0MiB(0000000txo)
0000-00-00T00:00:00Z UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 height=000000 version=0x00000000 log0_work=00.000000 tx=000000000 date='0000-00-00T00:00:00Z' progress=0.000000 cache=000.0MiB(0000000txo)
```
Expected standard output from `bitcoind` (when in steady state) after this patch:
```
$ src/bitcoind
…
0000-00-00T00:00:00Z UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 height=000000 version=0x00000000 log0_work=00.000000 tx=000000000 date='0000-00-00T00:00:00Z' progress=0.000000 cache=000.0MiB(0000000txo)
0000-00-00T00:00:00Z UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 height=000000 version=0x00000000 log0_work=00.000000 tx=000000000 date='0000-00-00T00:00:00Z' progress=0.000000 cache=000.0MiB(0000000txo)
0000-00-00T00:00:00Z UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 height=000000 version=0x00000000 log0_work=00.000000 tx=000000000 date='0000-00-00T00:00:00Z' progress=0.000000 cache=000.0MiB(0000000txo)
0000-00-00T00:00:00Z UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 height=000000 version=0x00000000 log0_work=00.000000 tx=000000000 date='0000-00-00T00:00:00Z' progress=0.000000 cache=000.0MiB(0000000txo)
0000-00-00T00:00:00Z UpdateTip: new best=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 height=000000 version=0x00000000 log0_work=00.000000 tx=000000000 date='0000-00-00T00:00:00Z' progress=0.000000 cache=000.0MiB(0000000txo)
```
I find the latter alternative much easier to visually scan for anomalies (and more aesthetically pleasing TBH!).
Non-GUI users deserve nice interfaces too :)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 25f899cc23a791c08e19acae91bebda6c3538d37
Tree-SHA512: 5970798c41b041527ebdcbd843c5e136c257c28c3b21fc74102da8970406ca5c0c7e406305c5e6e67de5c1708dc1858af07a77a2e05f44159b7103423e8ab32f
2a39ccf1334ef3c48c6f9969a0fc916b9e10aae1 Add include for std::bind. (sinetek)
Pull request description:
Hi, this patch adds in <functional> because the GUI code makes use of std::bind.
That's all.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 2a39ccf1334ef3c48c6f9969a0fc916b9e10aae1
Tree-SHA512: fb5ac07d9cd5d006182b52857b289a9926362a2f1bfa4f7f1c78a088670e2ccf39ca28214781df82e8de3909fa3e69685fe1124a7e3ead758575839f5f2277a9
90f9fc274bf69b33adea593146ff5d6793123781 qt: Save QSplitter state in QSettings (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR adds the ability to save the `QSplitter` widget state in `QSettings` during shutdown, and restore it on startup.
A user no longer needs to adjust the splitter every time :)
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 90f9fc274bf69b33adea593146ff5d6793123781
jonatack:
ACK 90f9fc274bf69b33adea593146ff5d6793123781 this sets the "PeersTabSplitterSizes" value in the RPCConsole dtor and restores it in the RPCConsole ctor; tested in Debian with various split settings, tab open/close sequences, and shutdown methods, and the Peers window split state was faithfully maintained.
Tree-SHA512: efbd6a4cee512982944955d36775e75a8a217b1dc49e62d42c6e402d2710dd44324b2c3c1edeb5fe38d9229e0e4a39734d1f4e63405ade8694762e1bbf72020b
efaf80e9bb0afeca2955720bfe6c225d7864036b fuzz: check that certain script TxoutType are nonstandard (Michael Dietz)
Pull request description:
- Every transaction of type NONSTANDARD must not be a standard script
- The only know types of nonstandard scripts are NONSTANDARD and certain NULL_DATA and MULTISIG scripts
When reviewing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20761 I figured this is very similar and might also be good to have
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK efaf80e9bb0afeca2955720bfe6c225d7864036b
Tree-SHA512: 6f563ee3104ea9d2633aad95f1d003474bea759d0f22636c37aa91b5536a6ff0800c42447285ca8ed12f1b3699bf781dae1e5e0a3362da578749cd3164a06ea4
89895773b72275a620951730aef0b52e9437bc13 Fix length of R check in test/key_tests.cpp:key_signature_tests (Dmitry Petukhov)
Pull request description:
The code before the fix only checked the length of R value of the last
signature in the loop, and only for equality (but the length can be
less than 32)
The fixed code checks that length of the R value is less than or equal
to 32 on each iteration of the loop
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 89895773b72275a620951730aef0b52e9437bc13
Tree-SHA512: 73eb2bb4a6c1c5fc11dd16851b28b43037ac06ef8cfc3b1f957429a1fca295c9422d67ec6c73c0e4bb4919f92e22dc5d733e84840b0d01ad1a529aa20d906ebf
1e9bfd4926a3cbb9db877c773a60b0bbbbe8bde0 qt: Reset toolbar after all wallets are closed (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
If the last open wallet is closed from the non-"Overview" tab, that tab remains active when a new wallet is opened:
This PR fixes this bug.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 1e9bfd4926a3cbb9db877c773a60b0bbbbe8bde0.
luke-jr:
utACK 1e9bfd4926a3cbb9db877c773a60b0bbbbe8bde0
jonasschnelli:
utACK 1e9bfd4926a3cbb9db877c773a60b0bbbbe8bde0
Tree-SHA512: a8dfd7591267e9544ad40c87581d554e5cfaad4b2a5bbfdbaf2596dc6869d2ac6cf7877adfef3d528fc61b081d40c6e30d787bbd7280ef7946aa7f7d9bc8b18e
a92485b2c250fd18f55d22aa32722bf52ab32bfe addrman: use unordered_map instead of map (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
`CAddrMan` uses `std::map` internally even though it does not require
that the map's elements are sorted. `std::map`'s access time is
`O(log(map size))`. `std::unordered_map` is more suitable as it has a
`O(1)` access time.
This patch lowers the execution times of `CAddrMan`'s methods as follows
(as per `src/bench/addrman.cpp`):
```
AddrMan::Add(): -3.5%
AddrMan::GetAddr(): -76%
AddrMan::Good(): -0.38%
AddrMan::Select(): -45%
```
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK a92485b2c250fd18f55d22aa32722bf52ab32bfe
achow101:
ACK a92485b2c250fd18f55d22aa32722bf52ab32bfe
hebasto:
re-ACK a92485b2c250fd18f55d22aa32722bf52ab32bfe, only suggested changes and rebased since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18722#pullrequestreview-666663681) review.
Tree-SHA512: d82959a00e6bd68a6c4c5a265dd08849e6602ac3231293b7a3a3b7bf82ab1d3ba77f8ca682919c15c5d601b13e468b8836fcf19595248116635f7a50d02ed603
9adc2f80fc14f11ee2b1f989ee7be71b58481e6f Refactor OutputGroups to handle effective values, fees, and filtering (Andrew Chow)
7d07e864b8846be186648814a5aaf34269f914a3 Use real value when calculating OutputGroup value (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently, the effective values and filtering for positive effective values is done outside of the OutputGroup. We should instead have functions in Outputgroup to do this and call those for each OutputGroup. So this PR does that.
This makes future changes for effective values in coin selection much easier.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
reACK 9adc2f80fc14f11ee2b1f989ee7be71b58481e6f
fjahr:
re-ACK 9adc2f80fc14f11ee2b1f989ee7be71b58481e6f
meshcollider:
Light code review ACK 9adc2f80fc14f11ee2b1f989ee7be71b58481e6f
Tree-SHA512: 7445c94b7295b45bcd83a6f8a5c8f6961a89453fcc856335192d4b4a66aec7724513616b04e5111588ab208c89b311055399d6279cd9c4ce452aefb85f04b64a
7486e2771e7b5d6fa84df6e954be76350c84e220 Tests: Unit test related to WalletDB ReadKeyValue (Bushstar)
32def8d1c29e0855fe5429687acabd2f29119316 Catch ios_base::failure specifically (Peter Bushnell)
Pull request description:
In https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2950 a hash of the pubkey and private was added to speed up key import, this was made backwards compatible by reading the hash in a try block with an ellipses catch all in case the hash was not present.
CDataStream::read() specifically throws std::ios_base::failure, backwards compatibility expects only that error to be thrown, if something else gets thrown we should not be catching it. The change in this commit is to catch that exception only. If any other exception is thrown other than std::ios_base::failure it will be caught by the wider try block and an error written to the log and/or console.
CDataStream::read() throwing std::ios_base::failure.
2c364fde42/src/streams.h (L191)
Wider catch statements that pick up all others exceptions other than ios_base::failure.
2c364fde42/src/wallet/walletdb.cpp (L425)2c364fde42/src/wallet/walletdb.cpp (L430)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7486e2771e7b5d6fa84df6e954be76350c84e220
Tree-SHA512: 5364bf935af8ec603bf5b8fef8c23b5cdaa4fe3506090cff988413221f2eaa99f7a91929afb42a35f8881ce2328744a0d32052da51ca0a5b2e65b6809e97f604
fa8bed6a47c88f769ae05b04b93eeaf2e1011478 fuzz: Temporarily disable failing assert in banman fuzz test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Otherwise the remainder of the fuzz test can't be fuzzed without running into crashes
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa8bed6a47c88f769ae05b04b93eeaf2e1011478
Tree-SHA512: ec6606292e2cfd26484c7f6caf1c418c377da54111b332990fce68373f0438defda71d931a42ca34431527fbc172dd2fdf29b260afca15b34910ee137de1c365
f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec doc: GetTransaction()/getrawtransaction follow-ups to #22383 (John Newbery)
abc57e1f0882a1a2bb20474648419979af6e383d refactor: move `GetTransaction(...)` to node/transaction.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
~This PR is based on #22383, which should be reviewed first~ (merged by now).
In [yesterday's PR review club session to PR 22383](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22383), the idea of moving the function `GetTransaction(...)` from src/validation.cpp to src/node/transaction.cpp came up. With this, the circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is removed (see change in `lint-circular-dependencies.sh`). Thanks to jnewbery for suggesting and to sipa for providing historical background.
Relevant IRC log:
```
17:52 <jnewbery> Was anyone surprised that GetTransaction() is in validation.cpp? It seems to me that node/transaction.cpp would be a more appropriate place for it.
17:53 <raj_> jnewbery, +1
17:53 <stickies-v> agreed!
17:54 <glozow> jnewbery ya
17:54 <jnewbery> seems weird that validation would call into txindex. I wonder if we remove this function, then validation would no longer need to #include txindex
17:54 <sipa> GetTransaction predates node/transaction.cpp, and even the generic index framework itself :)
17:55 <sipa> (before 0.8, validation itself used the txindex)
17:55 <jnewbery> (and GetTransaction() seems like a natural sibling to BroadcastTransaction(), which is already in node/transaction.cpp)
17:55 <jnewbery> sipa: right, this is not meant as a criticism of course. Just wondering if we can organize things a bit more rationally now that we have better separation between things.
17:55 <sipa> jnewbery: sure, just providing background
17:56 <sipa> seems very reasonable to move it elsewhere now
```
The commit should be trivial to review with `--color-moved`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec
rajarshimaitra:
tACK f685a13bef
mjdietzx:
crACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec
LarryRuane:
Code review, test ACK f685a13bef0418663015ea6d8f448f075510c0ec
Tree-SHA512: 0e844a6ecb1be04c638b55bc4478c2949549a4fcae01c984eee078de74d176fb19d508fc09360a62ad130677bfa7daf703b67870800e55942838d7313246248c
c3e111a7daf5800026dda4455c737de0412528f1 Reduced number of validations in `tx_validationcache_tests` to keep the run time reasonable. (lucash-dev)
Pull request description:
Following a suggestion in the comments, changed `ValidateCheckInputsForAllFlags` from testing all possible flag combinations to testing a random subset. Also created a new enum constant for the highest flag, so that this test doesn’t keep testing an incomplete subset in case a new flag is added.
Timing for `checkinputs_test`:
```
Before: 6.8s
After: 3.7s
----------------
Saved: 3.1s (45%)
```
This PR was split from #13050. Also see #10026.
ACKs for top commit:
leonardojobim:
tACK c3e111a7da.
kallewoof:
ACK c3e111a7daf5800026dda4455c737de0412528f1
theStack:
re-ACK c3e111a7daf5800026dda4455c737de0412528f1
Tree-SHA512: bef49645bdd4f61ec73cc77a9f028b95d9856db9446d2e7fc9a48867a6f0e94c2c9f150cb771a30fe852db0efb0a1bd15d38b00d712651793ccb59ff6157a7b4
78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b prefer to use txindex if available for GetTransaction (Jameson Lopp)
Pull request description:
Fixes#22382
Motivation: prevent excessive disk reads if txindex is enabled.
Worth noting that this could be argued to be less of a bug and more of an issue of undefined behavior. If a user calls GetTransaction with the wrong block hash, what should happen?
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
theStack:
Code review ACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
LarryRuane:
tACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
luke-jr:
utACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
jnewbery:
utACK 78f4c8b98eada337346ffb206339c3ebae4ff43b
rajarshimaitra:
Code review ACK 78f4c8b98e
lsilva01:
Code Review ACK and Tested ACK 78f4c8b98e on Ubuntu 20.04
Tree-SHA512: af7db5b98cb2ae4897b28476b2fa243bf7e6f850750d9347062fe8013c5720986d1a3c808f80098e5289bd84b085de03c81a44e584dc28982f721c223651bfe0
20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364 rpc: Return block time in getblockchaininfo (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Return tip time in `getblockchaininfo`, for some use cases this can save a call to `getblock`.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
theStack:
re-ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
0xB10C:
ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
kristapsk:
ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
Zero-1729:
re-ACK 20edf4bcf61e9fa310c3d7f3cac0c80a04df5364
Tree-SHA512: 29a920cfff1ef53e0af601c3f93f8f9171f3be47fc84b0fa293cb865b824976e8c1510b17b27d17daf0b8e658dd77d9dc388373395f0919fc4a23cd5019642d5
f036dfbb692c4d44d0f59194d089ed0aa1096347 [addrman] Remove unused test_before_evict argument from Good() (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This has never been used in the public interface method since it was
introduced in #9037.
ACKs for top commit:
lsilva01:
Tested ACK f036dfbb69 on Ubuntu 20.04.
theStack:
Code-review ACK f036dfbb692c4d44d0f59194d089ed0aa1096347
Tree-SHA512: 98145d9596b4ae1f354cfa561be1a54c6b8057c920e0ac3d4c1d42c9326b2dad2d44320f4171bb701d97088b216760cca8017b84c8b5dcd2b1dc8f158f28066d
fa621ededdfe31a200b77a8787de7e3d2e667aec refactor: Pass script verify flags as uint32_t (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The flags are cast to unsigned in the interpreter anyway, so avoid the confusion (and fuzz crashes) by just passing them as unsigned from the beginning.
Also, the flags are often inverted bit-wise with the `~` operator, which also works on signed integers, but might cause confusion as the sign bit is flipped.
Fixes#22233
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Concept and code review ACK fa621ededdfe31a200b77a8787de7e3d2e667aec
kristapsk:
ACK fa621ededdfe31a200b77a8787de7e3d2e667aec
jonatack:
ACK fa621ededdfe31a200b77a8787de7e3d2e667aec
Tree-SHA512: ea0720f32f823fa7f075309978672aa39773c6019d12b6c1c9d611fc1983a76115b7fe2a28d50814673bb6415c311ccc05b99d6e871575fb6900faf75ed17769
fae108ceb53f61d7338ba205873623ede3c1d3be Fix incorrect whitespace in addrman (MarcoFalke)
fa32024d51c098441623e246f304a80f011e29d1 Add missing GUARDED_BY to CAddrMan::insecure_rand (MarcoFalke)
fab755b77f88873f01cbd988051de7ad3f0150de fuzz: Actually use const addrman (MarcoFalke)
fae0c79351ce34186249d44af0c5c9c7521f4b6c refactor: Mark CAddrMan::GetAddr const (MarcoFalke)
fa02934c8c9d290ea4d12683e8680c70967a4d3a refactor: Mark CAddrMan::Select const (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
To clarify that a call to this only changes the random state and nothing else.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK fae108ceb53f61d7338ba205873623ede3c1d3be
theStack:
re-ACK fae108ceb53f61d7338ba205873623ede3c1d3be 🍦
Tree-SHA512: 3ffb211d4715cc3daeb3bfcdb3fcc6b108ca96df5fa565510436fac0e8da86c93b30c9c4aad0563e27d84f615fcd729481072009a4e2360c8b3d40787ab6506a
2748e8793267126c5b40621d75d1930e358f057e script: prevent UB when computing abs value for num opcode serialize (pierrenn)
Pull request description:
This was reported by practicalswift here #18046
It seems that the original author of the line used a reference to glibc `abs`: https://github.com/lattera/glibc/blob/master/stdlib/abs.c
However depending on some implementation details this can be undefined behavior for unusual values.
A detailed explanation of the UB is provided here : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17313579/is-there-a-safe-way-to-get-the-unsigned-absolute-value-of-a-signed-integer-with (by [Billy O'Neal](https://twitter.com/malwareminigun))
Simple relevant godbolt example : https://godbolt.org/z/yRwtCG
Thanks!
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 2748e8793267126c5b40621d75d1930e358f057e
MarcoFalke:
ACK 2748e8793267126c5b40621d75d1930e358f057e, only checked that the bitcoind binary does not change with clang -O2 🎓
practicalswift:
ACK 2748e8793267126c5b40621d75d1930e358f057e
Tree-SHA512: 539a34c636c2674c66cb6e707d9d0dfdce63f59b5525610ed88da10c9a8d59d81466b111ad63b850660cef3750d732fc7755530c81a2d61f396be0707cd86dec
fabe44e8154a6068d6cba91ec30f00345ed7b275 bench: Start nodes with -nodebuglogfile (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
For benchmarking we don't want to depend on the speed of the disk or the amount of debug logging
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fabe44e8154a6068d6cba91ec30f00345ed7b275 - This makes some of these benchmarks significantly faster to run. MempoolEviction total runtime is down from ~46s to 11s on my machine:
Tree-SHA512: d99700901650325896b9115d20b84a27042152f46266f595bf7ea1414528c0b346f4e707a12ee8b8ba99c35cf155e645e67971c1b2a679c4e609c400ff8b08ae
d51f0fa4b7b19281efe65aacf414845c661d0a13 doc: add release notes for 26896 (fanquake)
2b248798d96f794db08b7725730b5fb4e00b9b10 build: remove --enable-upnp-default from configure (fanquake)
02f5a5e7b5fd7ba35e407d4409202a0e0fed003c build: remove --enable-natpmp-default from configure (fanquake)
25a0e8ba0b31d8bd265df0589fe49241a60d0fc2 Remove configure-time setting of DEFAULT_UPNP (fanquake)
06562e5fa771dab275a9cab4914cd64d961a52bc Remove configure-time setting of DEFAULT_NATPMP (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This PR removes the `--enable-upnp-default` and `--enable-natpmp-default` options from configure.
It's odd to me that we maintain configure-time options for setting the default port-forwarding runtime state (but no other similar options), and I'm not sure what use-case it satisfies, that can't be achieved by multiple other means. I also doubt that we'll ever restart using these in release builds, or turning on any of this by default.
I think the only scenario these options would be used is when you want to compile your own binaries (we don't use them in Guix), with port-forwarding on by default, but otherwise can't or don't want to use a `.conf` file, can't or don't want to pass command line options at runtime, and also don't want to modify the source code?
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK d51f0fa4b7b19281efe65aacf414845c661d0a13, rebased and comments have been addressed since my recent [review](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26896#pullrequestreview-1273910740).
TheCharlatan:
ACK d51f0fa4b7b19281efe65aacf414845c661d0a13
Tree-SHA512: 481decd8bddd8b03b7319591e3acf189f7b6b96c9a9a8c5bc1a3f8ec00d0b8f9b52d2f5c28a298a2ec947cfe9611cfd184e393ccb2e4e21bfce86ca7d4de60d3
2896c412fadbc03916a33028f4f50fd87ac48edb Do not answer GETDATA for to-be-announced tx (Pieter Wuille)
f2f32a3dee9a965c8198f9ddd3aaebc627c273e4 Push down use of cs_main into FindTxForGetData (Pieter Wuille)
c6131bf407c1ada78a0e5509a702bc7da0bfd57d Abstract logic to determine whether to answer tx GETDATA (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This PR intends to improve transaction-origin privacy.
In general, we should try to not leak information about what transactions we have (recently) learned about before deciding to announce them to our peers. There is a controlled transaction dissemination process that reveals our transactions to peers that has various safeguards for privacy (it's rate-limited, delayed & batched, deterministically sorted, ...), and ideally there is no way to test which transactions we have before that controlled process reveals them. The handling of the `mempool` BIP35 message has protections in this regard as well, as it would be an obvious way to bypass these protections (handled asynchronously after a delay, also deterministically sorted).
However, currently, if we receive a GETDATA for a transaction that we have not yet announced to the requester, we will still respond to it if it was announced to *some* other peer already (because it needs to be in `mapRelay`, which only happens on the first announcement). This is a slight privacy leak.
Thankfully, this seems easy to solve: `setInventontoryTxToSend` keeps track of the txids we have yet to announce to a peer - which almost(*) exactly corresponds to the transactions we know of that we haven't revealed to that peer. By checking whether a txid is in that set before responding to a GETDATA, we can filter these out.
(*) Locally resubmitted or rebroadcasted transactions may end up in setInventoryTxToSend while the peer already knows we have them, which could result in us incorrectly claiming we don't have such transactions if coincidentally requested right after we schedule reannouncing them, but before they're actually INVed. This is made even harder by the fact that filterInventoryKnown will generally keep known reannouncements out of setInventoryTxToSend unless it overflows (which needs 50000 INVs in either direction before it happens).
The condition for responding now becomes:
```
(not in setInventoryTxToSend) AND
(
(in relay map) OR
(
(in mempool) AND
(old enough that it could have expired from relay map) AND
(older than our last getmempool response)
)
)
```
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 2896c41
ajtowns:
ACK 2896c412fadbc03916a33028f4f50fd87ac48edb
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 2896c412fa
jonatack:
ACK 2896c412fadbc03916 per `git diff 2b3f101 2896c41` only change since previous review is moving the recency check up to be verified first in `FindTxForGetData`, as it was originally in 353a391 (good catch), before looking up the transaction in the relay pool.
jnewbery:
code review ACK 2896c412fadbc03916a33028f4f50fd87ac48edb
Tree-SHA512: e7d5bc006e626f60a2c108a9334f3bbb67205ace04a7450a1e4d4db1d85922a7589e0524500b7b4953762cf70554c4a08eec62c7b38b486cbca3d86321600868
83da576f4416c64b5d520819208a722b2273739a net: use CMessageHeader::HEADER_SIZE, add missing include (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
as suggested 16 months ago by Gleb Naumenko in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15197#issuecomment-456181865.
`static constexpr CMessageHeader::HEADER_SIZE` is already used in this file, `src/net.cpp`, in 2 instances. This commit replaces the remaining 2 integer values in the file with it and adds the explicit include header.
Co-authored by: Gleb Naumenko <naumenko.gs@gmail.com>
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 83da576
practicalswift:
ACK 83da576f4416c64b5d520819208a722b2273739a -- patch looks correct
theStack:
ACK 83da576f4416c64b5d520819208a722b2273739a -- verified that its just magic number elimination refactoring and additionally checked that all tests pass 👍
Tree-SHA512: 5b915483bca4ea162c259865a1b615d73b88a1b1db3f82db05f770d10b8a42494d948f5b21badbcce2d9efa5915b8cbb6af83073867c23d2f152c0d35ac37b96
746736639e6d05acdb85c866d4c605c947d4c500 [net processing] Only send a getheaders for one block in an INV (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Headers-first is the primary method of announcement on the network. If a node fell back sending blocks by inv, it's probably for a re-org. The final block hash provided should be the highest, so send a getheaders and then fetch the blocks we need to catch up.
Sending many GETHEADERS messages to the peer would cause them to send a large number of potentially large HEADERS messages with redundant data, which is a waste of bandwidth.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 746736639e6d05acdb85c866d4c605c947d4c500
mzumsande:
utACK 746736639e6d05acdb85c866d4c605c947d4c500 as per ajtowns' reasoning.
naumenkogs:
utACK 7467366
ajtowns:
ACK 746736639e6d05acdb85c866d4c605c947d4c500
jonatack:
ACK 746736639e6d05acdb85c866d4c605c947d4c500
Tree-SHA512: 59e243b80d3f0873709dfacb2e4ffba34689aad7de31ec7f69a64e0e3a0756235a0150e4082ff5de823949ba4411ee1aed2344b4749b62e0eb1ea906e41f5ea9
Prior required changes: bitcoin/bitcoin#19438 from
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5740
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Assertion failure:
```
assertion: ok
file: evo/mnhftx.cpp, line: 287
function: AbstractEHFManager::Signals CMNHFManager::GetFromCache(const CBlockIndex*)
No debug information available for stacktrace. You should add debug information and then run: dash-qt -printcrashinfo=bvcgc43iinzgc43ijfxgm3ybaadwiyltnawxc5e3ifzxgzlsoruw63ramzqws3dvojstucraebqxg43foj2gs33ohiqg62ykeaqgm2lmmu5cazlwn4xw23timz2hqltdobycyidmnfxgkoragi4docraebthk3tdoruw63r2ebawe43uojqwg5cfjbde2ylomftwk4r2hjjwsz3omfwhgicdjvheqrsnmfxgcz3foi5dur3fordhe33ninqwg2dffbrw63ttoqqegqtmn5rwwslomrsxqkrjbyrelhyaaaaaaaedgkiaaaaaaaadsm4qaaaaaaaa7gpyqaaaaaaaa2njraaaaaaaadkl3caaaaaaaabhxznqaaaaaaadqa2eaaaaaaaax33twaaaaaaabwaihqaaaaaaac7yooqbaaaaaahba45qcaaaaaacwkz2aeaaaaaaeitgeaiaaaaaaaa=
dash-qt: evo/mnhftx.cpp:287: AbstractEHFManager::Signals CMNHFManager::GetFromCache(const CBlockIndex*): Assertion `ok' failed.
```
This can happen in case if Dash Core has been update from v19 (or
earlier v20.alphaX) to v20.0.0 after v20 activation without re-indexing
## What was done?
`CMNHFManager` is visiting missing blocks recursively until reach first
v20 block or first block actually saved in evoDb.
Without changes from bitcoin/bitcoin#19438 there's an other issue:
```
2023-11-27T11:12:10Z POTENTIAL DEADLOCK DETECTED
Previous lock order was:
(2) 'cs_main' in llmq/instantsend.cpp:459 (in thread 'isman')
(1) 'cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/utils.cpp:711 (in thread 'isman')
Current lock order is:
'cs_dip3list' in qt/masternodelist.cpp:135 (TRY) (in thread 'main')
(1) 'cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/utils.cpp:719 (in thread 'main')
(2) 'cs_main' in node/blockstorage.cpp:77 (in thread 'main')
Assertion failed: detected inconsistent lock order for 'cs_main' in node/blockstorage.cpp:77 (in thread 'main'), details in debug log.
2023-11-27T11:12:10Z Posix Signal: Aborted
```
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional test; run dash-qt on my local backup of problematic
storage (succeed without error); reindex testnet.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
e48826ad87b4f92261f7433e84f48dac9bd9e5c3 tests: remove ComputeBlockVersion shortcut from versionbits tests (Anthony Towns)
c5f36725e877d8eb492383844f8ef7535466b366 [refactor] Move ComputeBlockVersion into VersionBitsCache (Anthony Towns)
4a69b4dbe0d7f504811b67c399da7e6d11e4f805 [move-only] Move ComputeBlockVersion from validation to versionbits (Anthony Towns)
0cfd6c6a8f929d5567ac41f95c21548f115efee5 [refactor] versionbits: make VersionBitsCache a full class (Anthony Towns)
8ee3e0bed5bf2cd3c7a68ca6ba6c65f7b9a72cca [refactor] rpc/blockchain.cpp: SoftForkPushBack (Anthony Towns)
92f48f360da5f425428b761219301f509826bec4 deploymentinfo: Add DeploymentName() (Anthony Towns)
ea68b3a5729f5d240e968388c4f88acffeb27228 [move-only] Rename versionbitsinfo to deploymentinfo (Anthony Towns)
c64b2c6a0f79369624ae96b2e3d579d50aae4de6 scripted-diff: rename versionbitscache (Anthony Towns)
de55304f6e7a8b607e6b3fc7436de50910747b0c [refactor] Add versionbits deployments to deploymentstatus.h (Anthony Towns)
2b0d291da8f479739ff394dd92801da8c40b9f8e [refactor] Add deploymentstatus.h (Anthony Towns)
eccd736f3dc231ac0306ca763c3b72cf8247230a versionbits: Use dedicated lock instead of cs_main (Anthony Towns)
36a4ba0aaaa9b35185d7178994e36bc02cca9887 versionbits: correct doxygen comments (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Introduces helper functions to make it easy to bury future deployments, along the lines of the suggestion from [11398](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11398#issuecomment-335599326) "I would prefer it if a buried deployment wouldn't require all code paths that check the BIP9 status to require changing".
This provides three functions: `DeploymentEnabled()` which tests if a deployment can ever be active, `DeploymentActiveAt()` which checks if a deployment should be enforced in the given block, and `DeploymentActiveAfter()` which checks if a deployment should be enforced in the block following the given block, and overloads all three to work both with buried deployments and versionbits deployments.
This adds a dedicated lock for the versionbits cache, which is acquired internally by the versionbits functions, rather than relying on `cs_main`. It also moves moves versionbitscache into deploymentstatus to avoid a circular dependency with validation.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK e48826ad87b4f92261f7433e84f48dac9bd9e5c3
gruve-p:
ACK e48826ad87
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK e48826ad87b4f92261f7433e84f48dac9bd9e5c3 🥈
Tree-SHA512: c846ba64436d36f8180046ad551d8b0d9e20509b9bc185aa2639055fc28803dd8ec2d6771ab337e80da0b40009ad959590d5772f84a0bf6199b65190d4155bed
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Avoid a crash on -reindex-chainstate.
## What was done?
`ResetBlockFailureFlags` is crashing when `m_chain.Tip()` is null. Call
`ResetBlockFailureFlags` inside `if (!is_coinsview_empty(chainstate))
{...}` block - we know `m_chain.Tip()` is not null there.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Try running a node with `-reindex-chainstate` cmd-line param w/ and
w/out this patch.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/4788#discussion_r854468664
noticed while working on #5731
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
run a node, check logs - there is a meaningful time span between `start`
and `done` now and not just zeros all the time.
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
faca9a3d5a6887517d02b994a43d0e1101b718bc test: Avoid intermittent issues due to async events in validationinterface_tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the tests have many issues:
* They setup the genesis block, even though it is not needed
* They queue an async `UpdatedBlockTip` even, which causes intermittent issues: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28146#issuecomment-1650064645
Fix all issues by trimming down the setup to just `ChainTestingSetup`.
ACKs for top commit:
Crypt-iQ:
tACK faca9a3d5a6887517d02b994a43d0e1101b718bc
Tree-SHA512: 4449040330f89bbaf5ce5b2052417c160b451c373987fdf1069596c07834ed81f0aea1506d53c7d2cd21062b27332d30679285dae194b272fd0cb9ce5ded32cf
7777f2a4bb1f9d843bc50a4e35085cfbb2808780 miner: Avoid stack-use-after-return in validationinterface (MarcoFalke)
fa5ceb25fce2200edf6b8ebfa6d4f01ed6774b95 test: Remove UninterruptibleSleep from test and replace it by SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue (MarcoFalke)
fa770ce7fe67685c43780e219d8232efbee0bb8e validationinterface: Rework documentation, Rename pwalletIn to callbacks (MarcoFalke)
fab6d060ce5f580db538070beec1c5518c8c777c test: Add unregister_validation_interface_race test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When a validationinterface has itself unregistered in one thread, but is about to get executed in another thread [1], there is a race:
* The validationinterface destructing itself
* The validationinterface getting dereferenced for execution
[1] 64139803f1/src/validationinterface.cpp (L82-L83)
This happens in the miner. More generally it happens everywhere where at least one thread is generating notifications and another one is unregistering a validationinterface.
This issue has been fixed in commit ab31b9d6fe7b39713682e3f52d11238dbe042c16, but the fix has not been applied to the miner.
Example where this happened in practice: https://travis-ci.org/github/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/675322230#L4414
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
Code review ACK 7777f2a4bb1f9d843bc50a4e35085cfbb2808780.
laanwj:
Code review ACK 7777f2a4bb1f9d843bc50a4e35085cfbb2808780
Tree-SHA512: 8087119243c71ba18a823a63515f3730d127162625d8729024278b447af29e2ff206f4840ee3d90bf84f93a2c5ab73b76c7e7044c83aa93b5b51047a166ec3d3
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
- The name `CB_V19_VERSION` is confusing because CbTx v2 was introduced
in v14, not v19
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/master/doc/release-notes/dash/release-notes-0.14.0.md#dip0004---coinbase-payload-v2
- There are magic numbers instead of constants in some places
- `CheckCbTx` should check whatever the upper limit is, not
`CB_V20_VERSION` specifically
## What was done?
Turn CbTx versions into enum using self-describing names
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Should fix compilation errors like
```
masternode/meta.cpp:43:9: error: call to member function 'pushKV' is ambiguous
ret.pushKV("lastOutboundAttemptElapsed", now - lastOutboundAttempt);
^~
masternode/meta.cpp:45:9: error: call to member function 'pushKV' is ambiguous
ret.pushKV("lastOutboundSuccessElapsed", now - lastOutboundSuccess);
^~
```
on FreeBSD + clang-15
kudos to @MrDefacto for finding the issue and testing the fix
## What was done?
Specify `now` variable type explicitly instead of relying on `auto`
## How Has This Been Tested?
MrDefacto confirmed it compiles with no issues on FreeBSD now
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Non-deterministic IS locks aren't used anymore since v18 dip24.
We should drop that support to make code simpler.
## What was done?
Dropped non-deterministic IS code, `evo_instantsend_tests` and
`feature_llmq_is_migration.py` (don't need it anymore), adjusted func
tests.
## How Has This Been Tested?
all tests, synced Testnet
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <545784+knst@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Should fix crashes like
```
: Corrupted block database detected.
Please restart with -reindex or -reindex-chainstate to recover.
Assertion failure:
assertion: globalInstance == nullptr
file: mnhftx.cpp, line: 43
function: CMNHFManager
0#: (0x105ADA27C) stacktraces.cpp:629 - __assert_rtn
1#: (0x104945794) mnhftx.cpp:43 - CMNHFManager::CMNHFManager(CEvoDB&)
2#: (0x10499DA90) compressed_pair.h:40 - std::__1::__unique_if<CMNHFManager>::__unique_single std::__1::make_unique[abi:v15006]<CMNHFManager, CEvoDB&>(CEvoDB&)
3#: (0x10499753C) init.cpp:1915 - AppInitMain(std::__1::variant<std::__1::nullopt_t, std::__1::reference_wrapper<NodeContext>, std::__1::reference_wrapper<WalletContext>, std::__1::reference_wrapper<CTxMemPool>, std::__1::reference_wrapper<ChainstateManager>, std::__1::reference_wrapper<CBlockPolicyEstimator>, std::__1::reference_wrapper<LLMQContext>> const&, NodeContext&, interfaces::BlockAndHeaderTipInfo*)
```
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
511aa4f1c7508f15cab8d7e58007900ad6fd3d5d Add unit test for ChaCha20's new caching (Pieter Wuille)
fb243d25f754da8f01793b41e2d225b917f3e5d7 Improve test vectors for ChaCha20 (Pieter Wuille)
93aee8bbdad808b7009279b67470d496cc26b936 Inline ChaCha20 32-byte specific constants (Pieter Wuille)
62ec713961ade7b58e90c905395558a41e8a59f0 Only support 32-byte keys in ChaCha20{,Aligned} (Pieter Wuille)
f21994a02e1cc46d41995581b54222abc655be93 Use ChaCha20Aligned in MuHash3072 code (Pieter Wuille)
5d16f757639e2cc6e81db6e07bc1d5dd74abca6c Use ChaCha20 caching in FastRandomContext (Pieter Wuille)
38eaece67b1bc37b2f502348c5d7537480a34346 Add fuzz test for testing that ChaCha20 works as a stream (Pieter Wuille)
5f05b27841af0bed1b6e7de5f46ffe33e5919e4d Add xoroshiro128++ PRNG (Martin Leitner-Ankerl)
12ff72476ac0dbf8add736ad3fb5fad2eeab156c Make unrestricted ChaCha20 cipher not waste keystream bytes (Pieter Wuille)
6babf402130a8f3ef3058594750aeaa50b8f5044 Rename ChaCha20::Seek -> Seek64 to clarify multiple of 64 (Pieter Wuille)
e37bcaa0a6dbb334ab6e817efcb609ccee6edc39 Split ChaCha20 into aligned/unaligned variants (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is an alternative to #25354 (by my benchmarking, somewhat faster), subsumes #25712, and adds additional test vectors.
It separates the multiple-of-64-bytes-only "core" logic (which becomes simpler) from a layer around which performs caching/slicing to support arbitrary byte amounts. Both have their uses (in particular, the MuHash3072 code can benefit from multiple-of-64-bytes assumptions), plus the separation results in more readable code. Also, since FastRandomContext effectively had its own (more naive) caching on top of ChaCha20, that can be dropped in favor of ChaCha20's new built-in caching.
I thought about rebasing #25712 on top of this, but the changes before are fairly extensive, so redid it instead.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ut reACK 511aa4f1c7508f15cab8d7e58007900ad6fd3d5d
dhruv:
tACK crACK 511aa4f1c7
Tree-SHA512: 3aa80971322a93e780c75a8d35bd39da3a9ea570fbae4491eaf0c45242f5f670a24a592c50ad870d5fd09b9f88ec06e274e8aa3cefd9561d623c63f7198cf2c7
8f79831ab57b8fce48bb7b01fce86fac338755a5 Refactor the chacha20 differential fuzz test (stratospher)
Pull request description:
This PR addresses [comments from #22704](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22704/files#discussion_r771510963) to make the following changes in `src/test/fuzz/crypto_diff_fuzz_chacha20.cpp`:
- replace `memcmp()` with ==
- add a missing assert statement to compare the encrypted bytes
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 02338460fb3a89e732558bf00f3aebf8f04daba194e03ae0e3339bb2ff6ba35d06841452585b739047a29f8ec64f36b1b4ce2dfa39a08f6ad44a6a937e7b3acb
4d0ac72f3ae78e3c6a0d5dc4f7e809583abd0546 [fuzz] Add fuzzing harness to compare both implementations of ChaCha20 (stratospher)
65ef93203cc6a977c8e96f07cb9155f46faf5004 [fuzz] Add D. J. Bernstein's implementation of ChaCha20 (stratospher)
Pull request description:
This PR compares Bitcoin Core's implementation of ChaCha20 with D. J. Bernstein's in order to find implementation discrepancies if any.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4d0ac72f3ae78e3c6a0d5dc4f7e809583abd0546
Tree-SHA512: f826144b4db61b9cbdd7efaaca8fa9cbb899953065bc8a26820a566303b2ab6a17431e7c114635789f0a63fbe3b65cb0bf2ab85baf882803a5ee172af4881544
fa7718344d2879bb3f3c00a4185c5445390c017d fuzz: Avoid OOM in system fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
If the inputs size is unlimited, the target may consume unlimited memory, because the argsmanager stores the argument names. Limiting the size should fix this issue.
Should fix https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=36906
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa7718344d2879bb3f3c00a4185c5445390c017d
Tree-SHA512: 6edfcf324ee9d94e511038ee01340f02db50bcb233af3f1a1717c3602164c88528d9d987e971ec32f1a4593b868019bea0102c53c9b02bfefec3dfde959483cf
81c09ee45caecf8d9daf6766b94cebf54f3f08cd Unroll the ChaCha20 inner loop for performance (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Unrolling the inner ChaCha20 loop gives a ~15% speedup for me in the CHACHA20_* benchmarks. It's a simple change, this performance helps with RNG generation, and will matter more for BIP324.
ACKs for top commit:
martinus:
tested ACK 81c09ee with clang++ 13.0.1, test `CHACHA20_1MB`:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 81c09ee45caecf8d9daf6766b94cebf54f3f08cd 🍟
Tree-SHA512: 108bd0ba573bb08de92d611e7be7c09a2c2700f9655f44129b87f9b71f7e101dfc6bd345783e7b4b9b40f0b003913cf59187f422da8cdb5b20887f7855b2611a
fa50d8b66e74792eb46515853e4aa8a99f25561b doc: Remove TODO comment in tx_verify (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The comment has no clear motivation, so it seems better to remove it and fix it when there is a reason.
An alternative (if a fix isn't possible when there is a clear motivation) would be to create an issue thread for easier discussion.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fa50d8b66e74792eb46515853e4aa8a99f25561b
Tree-SHA512: e9c25bab46a73b7c2db288c62ed9838a5e794b3b72db494173f4502da60b58dec4383064964c0842932cd30e4251fc01ad0c28681e2ef6cb442482eea2bad595
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Some headers include other heavy headers, such as `logging.h`,
`tinyformat.h`, `iostream`. These headers are heavy and increase
compilation time on scale of whole project drastically because can be
used in many other headers.
## What was done?
Moved many heavy includes from headers to cpp files to optimize
compilation time.
In some places added forward declarations if it is reasonable.
As side effect removed 2 circular dependencies:
```
"llmq/debug -> llmq/dkgsessionhandler -> llmq/debug"
"llmq/debug -> llmq/dkgsessionhandler -> llmq/dkgsession -> llmq/debug"
```
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run build 2 times before refactoring and after refactoring: `make clean
&& sleep 10s; time make -j18`
Before refactoring:
```
real 5m37,826s
user 77m12,075s
sys 6m20,547s
real 5m32,626s
user 76m51,143s
sys 6m24,511s
```
After refactoring:
```
real 5m18,509s
user 73m32,133s
sys 6m21,590s
real 5m14,466s
user 73m20,942s
sys 6m17,868s
```
~5% of improvement for compilation time. That's not huge, but that's
worth to get merged
There're several more refactorings TODO but better to do them later by
backports:
- bitcoin/bitcoin#27636
- bitcoin/bitcoin#26286
- bitcoin/bitcoin#27238
- and maybe this one: bitcoin/bitcoin#28200
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`ConnectBlock` can fail after `ProcessSpecialTxsInBlock`, we shouldn't
be notifying too early. Same for `DisconnectBlock` but that's less of an
issue imo.
## What was done?
Move notifications to the end of `ConnectBlock`/`DisconnectBlock`. There
is no `connman` in `CChainState` and I don't want to pass it in updates
struct so I changed `NotifyMasternodeListChanged` and used `connman`
from `CDSNotificationInterface` instead.
## How Has This Been Tested?
run unit test, run testnet qt wallet
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`creditpool` and `ehf` categories are missing in `logging`/`debug` RPCs
😞
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
run `debug` and `logging` RPCs and make sure these categories are listed
now
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
mn_rr should be backwards compatible to v20.0.0; in the case we need to
introduce breaking changes on any of the features in mn_rr then we
should create a new mn_rr_v2 hard fork.
## What was done?
Add timestamps for mn_rr for main net activation
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Be more explicit about the fact that spork24 is for non-mainnet only,
enforce it in code.
NOTE: I know we have EHF signalling disabled for mainnet in v20 but I
think it still makes sense to make sure spork24 condition won't slip
into mainnet in some future version accidentally.
## What was done?
pls see individual commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
1. we _should not_ skip masternode payments checks below
nSuperblockStartBlock or when governance is disabled
2. we _should_ skip superblock payee checks while we aren't synced yet
(should help recovering from missed triggers)
## What was done?
pls see individual commits.
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests, sync w/ and w/out `--disablegovernance`, reindexed on testnet
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
When Platform restarts on a network, it needs to sign requests using old
quorums.
We shouldn't remove data (secret key shares, vvec) for old Platform
quorums as we do with the rest of the llmqs.
## What was done?
We skip removing for Platform quorums younger than 2 months.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
no
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
```
Assertion failure:
assertion: quorum != nullptr
file: quorums.cpp, line: 547
function: ScanQuorums
```
## What was done?
Hold cs_main while scanning to make sure tip doesn't move. Happened in
`ProcessPendingInstantSendLocks()` only for me but I thought that it
would probably make sense to apply the same fix in other places too.
## How Has This Been Tested?
run `invalidateblock` for a deep enough height (100s of blocks)
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Use not_null if the function would crash if given a nullptr
## What was done?
Refactored to use gsl::not_null
## How Has This Been Tested?
Compiled
## Breaking Changes
Should be none
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Addressed issues and comments from [PR
comment](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5469#discussion_r1317886678)
and [PR
comment](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5469#discussion_r1338704082)
`Params()` should be const; global variable `CMNHFManager` is a better
out-come.
## What was done?
The helpers and direct calls of `UpdateMNParams` for each block to
update non-constant member in `Params()` is not needed anymore. Instead
`CMNHFManager` takes cares about status of Signals for each block,
update them dynamically and save in evo db.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests.
## Breaking Changes
Changed rpc `getblockchaininfo`.
the field `ehf` changed meaning: it's now only a flag -1/0; but it is
introduced a new field `ehf_height` now that a height.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5471
## What was done?
It splits from https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5443
Adds extra unit tests for BLS basic scheme; enforces BLS basic for Evo
Nodes in serialization/unserialization of CProRegTx, CProUpServTx.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run functional/unit tests + added new unit tests.
## Breaking Changes
Serialization slightly changed, but it should be not breaking change
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Currently, on functional tests v20 activates at height 1440 which is
later than needed.
## What was done?
Reduced the window size of v20 from 480 to 400 which activates v20 at
1200.
Adjusted tests to this change.
Note regarding the window analysis for MN payments in
`feature_llmq_evo.py` (reduced from 256 to 48 blocks):
48 window is enough to analyse 4 MNs and 5 EvoNodes (Weighted count=24)
On my machine using develop:
`python3 feature_llmq_rotation.py 145.45s user 30.00s system 68% cpu
4:16.93 total`
With this PR:
`python3 feature_llmq_rotation.py 119.26s user 24.61s system 62% cpu
3:50.89 total`
## How Has This Been Tested?
all tests
## Breaking Changes
no
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
63631beef6a0046390469971adf4500718ab34ad test: Remove intermittently failing and not very meaningful `BOOST_CHECK` in `cnetaddr_basic` (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Remove intermittently failing and not very meaningful `BOOST_CHECK` in `cnetaddr_basic`.
Fixes#21682.
Rationale from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21682#issuecomment-819897122:
> I've looked at that test before and I don't think that specific `BOOST_CHECK` makes much sense TBH :)
>
> 1.) I don't understand why we test if `ToString()` output includes `%zone_index`: it clearly doesn't on some platforms, so we cannot rely on it anyways. Then why test it?
>
> 2.) And perhaps more fundamentally: why would we even _want_ to have `%zone_index` in our textual `ToString()` output? I think the expectation is to get say `fe80::1ff:fe23:4567:890a` (without zone index) and not say `fe80::1ff:fe23:4567:890a%eth2 ` or `fe80::1ff:fe23:4567:890a%3 `when doing `ipv6_addr.ToString()` :)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 63631beef6a0046390469971adf4500718ab34ad
Tree-SHA512: 06863d1edfb9ad1ca9bcae09cf3f0f47b58bb29d222b70799c3dc059b96452889026e4b99b132782846d9896e3e798d17c7f9406e0e6a0bec1bffc6edb54e9df
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We need some network that mimics v20 governance budget changes a bit
better. All our networks _lower_ the budget after v20 activation while
mainnet would actually rise it.
## What was done?
Reuse `nHighSubsidyBlocks` as a starting point for a fixed nSubsidyBase
value to better mimic mainnet changes on v20.
## How Has This Been Tested?
That's a devnet-only change, so no testing yet
## Breaking Changes
Won't sync on old devnets after these changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
It's partial due to this missing changes:
```
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25233/files#diff-4cb884d03ebb901069e4ee5de5d02538c40dd9b39919c615d8eaa9d364bbbd77L632
```
cc61bc2e19b1c8cb32778ef42746d32b02cc2671 compat: remove glibcxx sanity checks (fanquake)
Pull request description:
These checks were added in #4339, (see also #4081), to test
our back-compat stubs, however, those stubs no-longer exist (#22930),
meaning that these checks are now just testing some specific standard
library behaviour, without a particular rationale, or reason, compared
to any other standard library functionlity we use.
There has also been some discussion about our sanity checks in the
context of the libbitcoinkernel refactoring, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25065#discussion_r880668218.
Removing the checks removes the need to worry about atleast the
glibcxx checks.
Also remove the list of checks from the doc in `init.h`, because it is
incomplete, and anyone who wants to know what checks are included can
look at the function.
Guix Build (arm64):
```bash
e18a81e25b4707cbe113fb4d3ba2459013c1178e7cecfe446e4f14ee5ecd2ce8 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/SHA256SUMS.part
9928cc38b79f827018cba0bdde98666b31806afcc79dd95a00acb8e153c36eec guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm-linux-gnueabihf-debug.tar.gz
ebf4635ba4688899ae62e4bb17ebb2afb25c538c4a8068ef515920fd4e43754e guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz
74c7e35b47c6d101fda7205f144d37150329b4c360db09d37b8c1437f3390898 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
6e12643b17be9326f1d873dfe51a52c082671540792877af624b42ca9f6e1791 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm64-apple-darwin-unsigned.dmg
1d86d0416c7a50afd7bd8d850f416b7c7277464ccc95e4dae53b5b59415fc83d guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm64-apple-darwin-unsigned.tar.gz
84070843f23839e7191ad3a667eb63c45f668eb95afbfb3fcdfb8363320f67d4 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/arm64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-arm64-apple-darwin.tar.gz
bf6ccd7b8c40476b1dc52b491757313ea3e96c43a01c8aabaf39f94dc1837329 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/dist-archive/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1.tar.gz
25e7e1ff7d8de38632abf9926343c8ba556209f3d03109c92864ffe72813a05f guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
d0398de83841607b1bf921d4553b30ad5e2d70d0570e96a2eaaf2762e1103c79 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-powerpc64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
f09cdc2ac2a2bb644f4749f3d74b5210ddb531594c33d127a907f0223e7793e5 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-powerpc64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
ef36a68ef4e5ee9b311df40062cd2296f897e7b1550e39e0643601cd7d469010 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
937b600a2b86304ccc5b6c71a7eaf8aa5e2020592724cef6a933a1955995480b guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-powerpc64le-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
eca4eec41e71fdf7a7b0fa4065afa49c47d3b9541ed2cb4d083ad4a0de102e37 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-powerpc64le-linux-gnu.tar.gz
981c0968c19905925a599cff357ec259c1e806bdb7691c7b52039be450bdad7c guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
89c709967f9a157256281fbf682aad246f2eaad9c2f1797c2787253cbabe12f8 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-riscv64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
454cd830dd382e176f5a23041fc33f93937668245481b0dd29fc04882d9528eb guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/riscv64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-riscv64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
e0812c2dc492e5c5f06e3685d19da8fb29ed38d3b32821d293ef01cb4fefbd79 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/SHA256SUMS.part
0e7d4241d8ac882a8091fa00a7813db87a3e5afec59627e45b6c910cfdd4a7b0 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-apple-darwin-unsigned.dmg
3faaca046cbb2642445a7dd1f389ed7bf94a65de8372441c36d5cb79c030ce31 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-apple-darwin-unsigned.tar.gz
73080f032a42db679baf0d09619671ac5b9d85be84a68bdd6b6709eb0e6465bd guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-apple-darwin/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.gz
07b6e1b6291404bca1044df4a45b6958b882ffb88c143ba98f1959960a394897 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/SHA256SUMS.part
16b455f62398f4aa0d3821abb1cceb8151e31c2664e3f974a764a5b8702b50f3 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-linux-gnu-debug.tar.gz
3c1a3a6a343f17b83f3b3d47e9426eccd2d0bcc7f824cd958fcf2cf06cdc3276 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-linux-gnu/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
f05afa688ea7211b0049555385fb2acc26986e24d8d00893389160e07037e693 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/SHA256SUMS.part
8bcbae67dd0746c42e1e7c7db67725a69289b08e9aa97b873d443d0aa355615d guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-win64-debug.zip
efa45e3b76e5ae08a8392d58e741325df572d92c7dd69b65d876cdcda541d2fc guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-win64-setup-unsigned.exe
3a8c2461ca826138c3017d06279a79b4c6bee2a507ad362aa6e424f76678596c guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-win64-unsigned.tar.gz
e56ae4f609d4e6a3ca5917a4bb763c91012ece2d236d6b62a666358791e43525 guix-build-cc61bc2e19b1/output/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bitcoin-cc61bc2e19b1-win64.zip
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
lgtm ACK cc61bc2e19b1c8cb32778ef42746d32b02cc2671
laanwj:
Concept and code review ACK cc61bc2e19b1c8cb32778ef42746d32b02cc2671
Tree-SHA512: 3da6aba44eef3f864fcbe897db1faa964923756e68c6a713e444b5d01c6d3542c3d7ca26678760e81a7a9e3cd40bd90622d0a7b697c27166817ba4f1023661ef
705c1f0648c72aa97e0ee699ff9a3da23fc9bd61 qt, refactor: Fix 'buttonClicked is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
c2f4e5ea1d6f01713ac69aaf6018884028aa55bd qt, refactor: Fix 'split is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
8e12d6996116e786e928077b22d9f47cee27319e qt, refactor: Fix 'QFlags is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
fa5749c805878304c107bcae0ae5ffa401dc7c4d qt, refactor: Fix 'pixmap is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
b02264cb5dfcef50eec8a6346471cbaa25370e00 qt, refactor: Fix 'QDateTime is deprecated' warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
[What's New in Qt 5.15](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/whatsnew515.html#deprecated-modules):
> To help preparing for the transition to Qt 6, numerous classes and member functions that will be removed from Qt 6.0 have been marked as deprecated in the Qt 5.15 release.
Fixes#36
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 705c1f0648c72aa97e0ee699ff9a3da23fc9bd61
promag:
Tested ACK 705c1f0648c72aa97e0ee699ff9a3da23fc9bd61 on macos with Apple clang version 11.0.3 (clang-1103.0.32.62) and brew qt 5.15.1.
Tree-SHA512: 29e00535b4583ceec0dfb29612e86ee29bdea13651b548c6d22167917a4a10464af49160a12b05151030699f690f437ebb9c4ae9f130f66a722415222165b44f
86b1ab64b1a5b56518787ef16ea54ddbbc97d83e refactor: Replace deprecated Qt::SystemLocale{Short,Long}Date (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
As all deprecated warning in Qt 5.15.0 were eliminated in #46, Qt 5.15.1 introduced another one that is fixed in this PR.
Required for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20182.
Details in Qt docs:
- https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qdatetime.html#toString-1
- https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qdate.html#toString-1
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
Tested ACK 86b1ab6 on MacOS 10.15.7 and Arch Linux both with Qt 5.15.1
jonasschnelli:
Tested ACK 86b1ab64b1a5b56518787ef16ea54ddbbc97d83e
Tree-SHA512: 1dbba8ee70c895bf58317172a9901cdbe5503b1d6258f51caaae88d88d332d9fbd4697c995192d31e3618ddfd532c5f5881289b3af1184422e5a9263a1224115
30cc1c6609ad7868f73e88afe0b0233d395ec08c refactor: Drop `owns_lock()` call (Hennadii Stepanov)
bff4e068b69edd40a00466156f860bde2df29268 refactor: Do not discard `try_lock()` return value (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Microsoft's C++ Standard Library uses the `[[nodiscard]]` attribute for `try_lock()`.
See: https://github.com/microsoft/STL/blob/main/stl/inc/mutex
This change allows to drop the current suppression for the warning C4838 and helps to prevent the upcoming warning C4858.
See: 539c26c923Fixesbitcoin/bitcoin#26017.
Split from bitcoin/bitcoin#25819.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 30cc1c6609ad7868f73e88afe0b0233d395ec08c
Tree-SHA512: ce17404e1c78af4f763129753caf8e5a0e1c91ba398778fe912f9fcc56a847e8112460d1a1a35bf905a593b7d8e0b16c6b099ad74976b67dca5f4f3eda6ff621
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Having `<protxhash> is not connected to us, badConnection=0` doesn't
help when we don't expect it to be connected 🤷♂️
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
MNs don't really vote NO on triggers that do not match their local
candidates because:
1. they bail out too early when they see that they are not the payee
2. the hash for objects to vote NO on was picked incorrectly.
## What was done?
Moved voting out of `CreateGovernanceTrigger` and into its own
`VoteGovernanceTriggers`. Refactored related code to use `optional`
while at it, dropped useless/misleading `IsValid()` call. Added some
safety belts, logging, tests.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
reindexed
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
There's too much spamming log items related to new v20 features: credit
pool, asset locks, EHF manager, EHF Signaling for MN_RR.
Some logs are still spamming after this PR but related code is not
changed here https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5658
## What was done?
- Removed some log items, tidy-up other.
- logs that supposed to appear for each block are moved to new
categories EHF and CREDITPOOL
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests, reviewed log output
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
No need to log things like `punished MN <protxhash>, penalty 515->515
(max=515)`
(check block 907818 on testnet, it has a lot of these)
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
n/a
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
It fixes this and similar warnings:
```
qt/test/trafficgraphdatatests.cpp:145:23: warning: ‘int qrand()’ is deprecated: use QRandomGenerator instead [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
145 | int in = qrand() % 1000;
| ~~~~~^~
```
Call of `qsrand` is not needed because QRandomGenerator is already randomly initialized
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
1. inactive MNs (`activeMasternodeInfo.proTxHash.IsNull() == true`)
should simply drop duplicated connections like regular nodes do.
2. we should not instantly drop inbound (potentially probe) connections
(even if `DeterministicOutboundConnection` results would say so), should
let `CMasternodeUtils::DoMaintenance` do that. This way a probing peer
should have a chance to get our `mnauth` back and mark this attempt as a
success. This should hopefully reduce the number of random unexplained
pose-punishments.
3. probe nodes must be disconnected ignoring everything else, quorum
nodes and relay members connect using their own logic which should not
interfere with the way probe nodes work. (meaningful changes only:
9134d964a0)
## What was done?
pls see individual commits
as a side-effect `activeMasternodeInfoCs` lock is moved out of
`ForEachNode`
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests, run a testnet mn
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fixes#5666
kudos to @tinshen for discovering the issue 👍
## What was done?
add missing logic in FundTransaction
## How Has This Been Tested?
implement/run tests, test rpc manually
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Renamed `bitcoin` to `coins` in help texts of mining RPCs.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
no
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
fa74e726c414f5f7a1e63126a69463491f66e0ec refactor: Make FEELER_SLEEP_WINDOW type safe (std::chrono) (MacroFake)
fa3b3cb9b5d944d34b1d5ac3e102ac333482a475 Expose underlying clock in CThreadInterrupt (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This gets rid of the `value*1000` manual conversion.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK fa74e726c414f5f7a1e63126a69463491f66e0ec
dergoegge:
Code review ACK fa74e726c414f5f7a1e63126a69463491f66e0ec
Tree-SHA512: 90409c05c25f0dd2f1c4dead78f707ebfd78b7d84ea4db9fcefd9c4958a1a3338ac657cd9e99eb8b47d52d4485fa3c947dce4ee1559fb56ae65878685e1ed9a3
92b35aba224ad4440f3ea6c01c841596a6a3d6f4 index, refactor: Change sync variables to use `std::chrono::steady_clock` (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR refactors the sync variables to use `std::chrono::steady_clock` as it is best suitable for measuring intervals.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
utACK 92b35aba224ad4440f3ea6c01c841596a6a3d6f4
ajtowns:
ACK 92b35aba224ad4440f3ea6c01c841596a6a3d6f4 - code review only
Tree-SHA512: cd4bafde47b30beb88c0aac247e41b4dced2ff2845c67a7043619da058dcff4f84374a7c704a698f3055c888d076d25503c2f38ace8fbc5456f624e0efe1e188
4446ef0a549d567a88d82b606aa8c47f115673f9 build: remove support for weak linking getauxval() (fanquake)
e56100c5b4daf2285dde9807bf654599aa19bd6b build: remove arm includes from getauxval() check (fanquake)
Pull request description:
It was [pointed out in #23030](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23030#issuecomment-922893367) that we might be able to get rid of our weak linking of [`getauxval()`](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/getauxval.3.html) (`HAVE_WEAK_GETAUXVAL`) entirely, with only Android being a potential holdout:
> I wonder if it's time to get rid of HAVE_WEAK_GETAUXVAL. I think it's confusing. Either we build against a C library that has this functionality, or not. We don't do this weak linking thing for any other symbols and recently got rid of the other glibc backwards compatibility stuff.
> Unless there is still a current platform that really needs it (Android?), I'd prefer to remove it from the build system, it has caused enough issues.
After looking at Android further, it would seem that given we are moving to using `std::filesystem`, which [requires NDK version 22 and later](https://github.com/android/ndk/wiki/Changelog-r22), and `getauxval` has been available in the since [API version 18](https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/cpu-features#features_using_libcs_getauxval3), that shouldn't really be an issue. Support for API levels < 19 will be dropped with the NDK 24 release, and according to [one website](https://apilevels.com/), supporting API level 18+ will cover ~99% of devices. Note that in the CI we currently build with NDK version 22 and API level 28.
The other change in this PR is removing the include of headers for ARM intrinsics, from the check for strong `getauxval()` support in configure, as they shouldn't be needed. Including these headers also meant that the check would basically only succeed when building for ARM. This would be an issue if we remove weak linking, as we wouldn't detect `getauxval()` as supported on other platforms. Note that we also use `getauxval()` in our RNG when it's available.
I've checked that with these changes we detect support for strong `getauxval()` on Alpine (muslibc). On Linux, previously we'd be detecting support for weak getauxval(), now we detect strong support. Note that we already require glibc 2.17, and `getauxval()` was introduced in `2.16`.
This is an alternative / supersedes #23030.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review and tested ACK 4446ef0a549d567a88d82b606aa8c47f115673f9
Tree-SHA512: 5f2a9e9cc2d63bddab73f0dcb169d4d6beda74622af82bc0439722f1189f81d052e2fc1eaf27056a7a606320d5ddc4c11075f0d051dd93d77c5e1c15337f354a
fea75ad3caa29972db32d3ce7e0fe125ec77a0eb refactor: Drop `boost/algorithm/string/replace.hpp` dependency (Hennadii Stepanov)
857526e8cbb0847a865e9c2509425960d458f535 test: Add test case for `ReplaceAll()` function (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
A new implementation of the `ReplaceAll()` seems enough for all of our purposes.
ACKs for top commit:
adam2k:
ACK Tested fea75ad3caa29972db32d3ce7e0fe125ec77a0eb
theStack:
Code-review ACK fea75ad3caa29972db32d3ce7e0fe125ec77a0eb
Tree-SHA512: dacfffc9d2bd1fb9f034baf8c045b1e8657b766db2f0a7f8ef7e25ee6cd888f315b0124c54aba7a29ae59186b176ef9868a8b709dc995ea215c6b4ce58e174d9
# Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Fixed some clang-tidy warnings
## What was done?
used more if-init
## How Has This Been Tested?
built
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Noticed a couple of things while I was trying to figure out if an
[issue](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5627#discussion_r1367153099)
@knst mentioned in #5627 could actually exist:
1. `GetPaymentsLimit()` won't work correctly with historical blocks rn.
We don't use it that way internally but it could be done via rpc and it
should provide correct results.
2. superblock params on regtest are too small to test them properly
3. because of (2) and a huge v20 activation window (comparing to sb
params) `feature_governance.py` doesn't test v20 switching states.
There's also no "sb on v20 activation block" test.
~NOTE: based on #5639 atm~
## What was done?
fix it, pls see individual commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Small dip0024 related cleanups, regtest only.
## What was done?
pls see individual commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
As discovered during platform testing by @shumkov , it seems as the
chain can halt in miner if somehow mempool would have several
transactions that are somehow invalid (maybe too low fee or something
else). They can't be mined, but miner can't prepare a valid block with
correct Credit Pool amount.
It is indeed can happen although I haven't reproduced it with functional
tests at the moment 🤷♂️
## What was done?
Refactored and simplified a logic of Credit Pool amount of validation
and added one more layer of validation: after all transaction are
actually added to block by miner, it is recalculated one more time.
Also used correct `pindexPrev` instead Tip() for EHF signals.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Before this changes platform failed with this error and chain halt:
```
2023-10-20T06:20:16Z (mocktime: 2023-10-20T06:28:29Z) ERROR: ConnectBlock(DASH): CheckCreditPoolDiffForBlock for block 9d635e1fd0d7a8a5bf16ce158d3a39cbf903864bb6d671769836ea7db6055230 failed with bad-cbtx-asse locked-amount
```
With changes from this PR platform is generate the asset-lock
transactions that are included to block and chain is not halt:
```
2023-10-27T10:45:37Z (mocktime: 2023-10-27T14:37:22Z) GetCreditPoolDiffForBlock: CCreditPool is CCreditPool(locked=32100015, currentLimit=32100015)
```
unit/functional tests are succeed.
## Breaking Changes
N/A; no consensus rules are changed
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
935acdcc79d1dc5ac04a83b92e5919ddbfa29329 refactor: modernize the implementation of uint256.* (pasta)
Pull request description:
- Constructors of uint256 to utilize Span instead of requiring a std::vector
- converts m_data into a std::array
- Prefers using `WIDTH` instead of `sizeof(m_data)`
- make all the things constexpr
- replace C style functions with c++ equivalents
- memset -> std::fill
This may also be replaced by std::memset, but I think that std::fill is more idiomatic of modern c++ and readable.
- memcpy -> std::copy
Note: In practice, implementations of std::copy avoid multiple assignments and use bulk copy functions such as std::memmove if the value type is TriviallyCopyable and the iterator types satisfy LegacyContiguousIterator. (https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/algorithm/copy)
This could also likely be replaced by std::memcpy, but as said above, I believe the using std::copy is the more c++ way to do anything and is almost guaranteed to compile to the same asm
- memcmp -> std::memcmp
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 935acdcc79d1dc5ac04a83b92e5919ddbfa29329
hebasto:
Approach ACK 935acdcc79d1dc5ac04a83b92e5919ddbfa29329.
aureleoules:
reACK 935acdcc79d1dc5ac04a83b92e5919ddbfa29329
john-moffett:
ACK 935acdcc79d1dc5ac04a83b92e5919ddbfa29329
stickies-v:
Approach ACK 935acdcc7
Tree-SHA512: 4f1ba54ff2198eea0e505d41e73d552c84c60f6878d5c85a94a8ab57f39afc94ef8d79258e7afd01fa84ec2a99f4404bb877eecd671f65e1ee9273f3129fc650
04fee75bacb9ec3bceff1246ba6c8ed8a8759548 Use ReadLE64 in uint256::GetUint64() instead of duplicating logic (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
No need to have a (naive) copy of the `ReadLE64` logic inside `uint256::GetUint64`, when we have an optimized function for exactly that.
ACKs for top commit:
davidgumberg:
ACK 04fee75bacb9ec3bceff1246ba6c8ed8a8759548
jonatack:
ACK 04fee75bacb9ec3bceff1246ba6c8ed8a8759548 review, this use of ReadLE64() is similar to the existing invocation by Num3072::Num3072(), sanity checked that before and after this change GetUint64() returns the same result (debug build, clang 13)
Tree-SHA512: 0fc2681536a18d82408411bcc6d5c6445fb96793fa43ff4021cd2933d46514c725318da35884f428d1799023921f33f8af091ef428ceb96a50866ac53a345356
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This reverts #5636 and introduces 2 similar cmd-line/config params which
are made specifically for regtest. Turned out Platform guys actually
still need smth like that for local testing #5259.
## What was done?
pls see individual commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests but we don't really have(/need?) tests for this.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
cc @shumkov
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
sb produced by sentinel:
>"DataString": ... \"payment_amounts\": \"20.00000000|20.00000000\", ...
>...
> "YesCount": 83,
sb produced by core:
>"DataString": ... \"payment_amounts\": \"20.00|20.00\", ...
> "YesCount": 13,
These 2 triggers are for the same block (900552), proposal hashes and
addresses are also the same but the difference in `payment_amounts`
format makes it look like a different trigger for core and this creates
a race.
## What was done?
Use `ValueFromAmount` instead of `FormatMoney` to avoid trimming
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix: possible assert call if nHeight in CDeterministicMNListDiff is
higher than Tip
Example of new log:
```
2023-09-28T17:35:50Z GetProjectedMNPayeesAtChainTip WARNING pindex is nullptr due to height=914160 chain height=914159
```
instead assert call:
```
...
#6 0x00007ffff7a33b86 in __assert_fail (assertion=0x55555783afd2 "pindex", file=0x5555577f2ed8 "llmq/utils.cpp", line=730,
function=0x5555577f2448 "bool llmq::utils::IsMNRewardReallocationActive(const CBlockIndex*)") at ./assert/assert.c:101
#7 0x0000555555ab7daf in llmq::utils::IsMNRewardReallocationActive (pindex=<optimized out>) at llmq/utils.cpp:730
#8 0x00005555559458ad in CDeterministicMNList::GetProjectedMNPayees (this=this@entry=0x7fffffffc690, pindex=0x0, nCount=<optimized out>, nCount@entry=2147483647)
at evo/deterministicmns.cpp:231
#9 0x000055555594614f in CDeterministicMNList::GetProjectedMNPayeesAtChainTip (this=this@entry=0x7fffffffc690, nCount=nCount@entry=2147483647) at evo/deterministicmns.cpp:216
#10 0x00005555558c9f51 in MasternodeList::updateDIP3List (this=this@entry=0x55555908cfd0) at qt/masternodelist.cpp:194
#11 0x00005555558ca9a0 in MasternodeList::updateDIP3ListScheduled (this=0x55555908cfd0) at qt/masternodelist.cpp:157
#12 0x000055555684a60f in void doActivate<false>(QObject*, int, void**) ()
#13 0x00005555568525b1 in QTimer::timerEvent(QTimerEvent*) ()
#14 0x0000555556844ce5 in QObject::event(QEvent*) ()
#15 0x0000555556ac3252 in QApplicationPrivate::notify_helper(QObject*, QEvent*) ()
#16 0x000055555681e6b8 in QCoreApplication::sendEvent(QObject*, QEvent*) ()
#17 0x000055555686de2a in QTimerInfoList::activateTimers() ()
#18 0x000055555686be84 in QEventDispatcherUNIX::processEvents(QFlags<QEventLoop::ProcessEventsFlag>) ()
#19 0x00005555569bf8a2 in QXcbUnixEventDispatcher::processEvents(QFlags<QEventLoop::ProcessEventsFlag>) ()
#20 0x000055555681caf6 in QEventLoop::exec(QFlags<QEventLoop::ProcessEventsFlag>) ()
#21 0x0000555556825f8a in QCoreApplication::exec() ()
...
```
## What was done?
ClientModel returns now a pair: MNList and CBlockIndex; so, we always
know the which one has been used even if current chain is switched.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run on my localhost from `c034ff0c2606142ba3e8894bc74f693b87374e5c` -
aborted with backtrace like above.
With both of commit - no assert more.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`gobject count all`
before:
>Governance Objects: 1195 (Proposals: 9, Triggers: 1186, Other: 0;
Erased: 1), Votes: 135064
after (in 10-ish minutes after gov sync is done):
>Governance Objects: 11 (Proposals: 9, Triggers: 2, Other: 0; Erased:
1), Votes: 702
I _think_ it happens when a node can't follow the right chain for some
reason but it keeps receiving triggers and votes from other nodes which
means triggers never expire on such node. This wouldn't be a problem for
us if we wouldn't reorg testnet/devnets from time to time. Once we reorg
the stuck node happily spams us with all the triggers it saved in the
meantime.
## What was done?
2 sb cycles into the future should be enough for all legit triggers,
drop the ones that have their height even higher
## How Has This Been Tested?
run a node, check rpc
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Dropped all changes made so far to be able to sync Testnet.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
Testnet syncing obviously
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Should not be 2 forks in one version
## What was done?
- Asset Unlock transactions (withdrawals) should be available only in
MN_RR fork
- MN_RR should not be auto-activated on Main net without intentional
release of code (and not by spork), but they are need on test net to
test platform.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
Yes (see "what was done")
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Implementation of accepted proposal:
https://www.dashcentral.org/p/expedite-60-20-20-reallocation
## What was done?
Activates changers brought in #5588 on `v20` hard fork instead of
`mn_rr`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests
## Breaking Changes
Again, Testnet sync is broken
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
When expecting a hard fork, we manually calculate activation heights.
## What was done?
Returning expected activation height for BIP9 softporks in `locked_in`
status in `getblockchaininfo` RPC.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We went from milliseconds to microseconds for these silently in #5616🙈
## What was done?
make it milliseconds again
## How Has This Been Tested?
n/a
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
