This RPC test will test both the activation mechanism of the first versionbits soft fork as well as testing many code branches of the consensus logic for BIP's 68, 112, and 113.
- Make wallet descendant searching more efficient
- Add new rpc call: abandontransaction
Unconfirmed transactions that are not in your mempool either due to eviction or other means may be unlikely to be mined. abandontransaction gives the wallet a way to no longer consider as spent the coins that are inputs to such a transaction. All dependent transactions in the wallet will also be marked as abandoned.
- Add RPC test for abandoned and conflicted transactions.
- [Wallet] Call notification signal when a transaction is abandoned
Github-Pull: #7312
Rebased-From: 9e6971725401e06d1fa3df0e2226d9d11fc1695c
In rpc-tests.py, don't override BITCOIND and BITCOINCLI if they're
already set. Makes it possible to run the tests with either another tree
or the GUI.
Github-Pull: #7209
Rebased-From: 83cdcbdca4
Ever since we #5913 have been sending invalid reject messages
for transactions and blocks.
test: Add basic test for `reject` code
Extend P2P test framework to make it possible to expect reject
codes for transactions and blocks.
Github-Pull: #7179
Rebased-From: 9fc6ed600320411903d7
This replaces using inv messages to announce new blocks, when a peer requests
(via the new "sendheaders" message) that blocks be announced with headers
instead of inv's.
Since headers-first was introduced, peers send getheaders messages in response
to an inv, which requires generating a block locator that is large compared to
the size of the header being requested, and requires an extra round-trip before
a reorg can be relayed. Save time by tracking headers that a peer is likely to
know about, and send a headers chain that would connect to a peer's known
headers, unless the chain would be too big, in which case we revert to sending
an inv instead.
Based off of @sipa's commit to announce all blocks in a reorg via inv,
which has been squashed into this commit.
Rebased-by: Pieter Wuille
bip65-cltv.py is based on the earlier BIP66 soft-fork RPC test
implemented by Pieter Wuille's 819bcf9b99
bip65-cltv-p2p.py is based on the earlier BIP66 P2P test by Suhas
Daftuar's d76412b068
1) created rpc-tests.py
2) deleted rpc-tests.sh
3) travis.yml points to rpc-tests.py
4) Modified Makefile.am
5) Updated README.md
6) Added tests_config.py and deleted tests-config.sh
7) Modified configure.ac with script to set correct path in tests_config.py
Associate with each CTxMemPoolEntry all the size/fees of descendant
mempool transactions. Sort mempool by max(feerate of entry, feerate
of descendants). Update statistics on-the-fly as transactions enter
or leave the mempool.
Also add ancestor and descendant limiting, so that transactions can
be rejected if the number or size of unconfirmed ancestors exceeds
a target, or if adding a transaction would cause some other mempool
entry to have too many (or too large) a set of unconfirmed in-
mempool descendants.
In txn_clone.py, non-essential test transaction tx2 was asserted
to be unconfirmed, but would occasionally confirm depending on
network behavior. Fix by explicitly sharing with miner and
checking for 1 confirmation.
Reduce required conflict tests from 4 to 2, by moving one invocation
each of txn_clone.py and txn_doublespend.py to the extented test
section. This saves about 15 seconds per test run for me.
4f40716 test: Move reindex test to standard tests (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
36c97b4 Bugfix: Don't check the genesis block header before accepting it (Jorge Timón)
Does what the old txnmall.sh test did.
Creates an equivalent malleated clone and tests that SyncMetaData
syncs the accounting effects from the original transaction to the
confirmed clone.
Tests error reporting of transaction signing via RPC call "signrawtransaction".
Expected results:
Test 1: create and sign a valid raw transaction with one input:
- 1) The transaction has a complete set of signatures
- 2) No script verification error occurred
Test 2: create and sign a raw transaction with one valid, one invalid and one missing input script:
- 3) The transaction has no complete set of signatures
- 4) Two script verification errors occurred
- 5) Script verification errors have certain properties ("txid", "vout", "scriptSig", "sequence", "error")
- 6) The verification errors refer to the invalid (vin 1) and missing input (vin 2)
bba2216 RPC test for "#5418 Report missing inputs in sendrawtransaction" (Jonas Schnelli)
de8e801 Report missing inputs in sendrawtransaction (Pieter Wuille)
comptool.py creates a tool for running a test suite on top of the mininode p2p
framework. It supports two types of tests: those for which we expect certain
behavior (acceptance or rejection of a block or transaction) and those for
which we are just comparing that the behavior of 2 or more nodes is the same.
blockstore.py defines BlockStore and TxStore, which provide db-backed maps
between block/tx hashes and the corresponding block or tx.
blocktools.py defines utility functions for creating and manipulating blocks
and transactions.
invalidblockrequest.py is an example test in the comptool framework, which
tests the behavior of a single node when sent two different types of invalid
blocks (a block with a duplicated transaction and a block with a bad coinbase
value).
mininode.py provides a framework for connecting to a bitcoin node over the p2p
network. NodeConn is the main object that manages connectivity to a node and
provides callbacks; the interface for those callbacks is defined by NodeConnCB.
Defined also are all data structures from bitcoin core that pass on the network
(CBlock, CTransaction, etc), along with de-/serialization functions.
maxblocksinflight.py is an example test using this framework that tests whether
a node is limiting the maximum number of in-flight block requests.
This also adds support to util.py for specifying the binary to use when
starting nodes (for tests that compare the behavior of different bitcoind
versions), and adds maxblocksinflight.py to the pull tester.
Immature coinbase spends are allowed in the memory pool if they can be mined in the next block.
They are not allowed in the memory pool if they cannot be mined in the next block.
This regression test tests those edge cases.
