* refactor/fix: use the shared_ptr<CWallet> where possible instead of getting the underlying pointer
This is also a fix in regards to the rpcevo.cpp file where the old code could result in a dangling pointer that could result in a crash as the shared_ptr we get back is discarded while the underlying ptr is still being used
* refactor: remove unneeded line
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
71d0344cf25d3aaf60112c5248198c444bc98105 docs: release note wording (Karl-Johan Alm)
3d2ff379131a01e4e9f9648b150e806104a23795 wallet/rpc: use static help text (Karl-Johan Alm)
53c3c1ea9e20f881c843a9219e48cec202e962f8 wallet/rpc/getbalances: add entry for 'mine.used' balance in results (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This addresses a few remaining issues pointed out in #13756:
* First commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r284907468
* Second commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r294868973
Ping jnewbery and achow101 as they pointed out these issues.
ACKs for commit 71d034:
jnewbery:
ACK 71d0344cf25d3aaf60112c5248198c444bc98105
meshcollider:
re-utACK 71d0344cf2
Tree-SHA512: 5e28822af0574ad07dbbed21aa2fe7866bf5770b4c0a1c150ad0da8af3152bcfb7170330a7497fa500326c594740ecf63733cf58325821e2811d7b911d5783a0
facfb4111d14a3b06c46690a2cca7ca91cea8a96 rpc: Deprecate getunconfirmedbalance and getwalletinfo balances (MarcoFalke)
999931cf8f167c7547f1015cdf05437a460c27f0 rpc: Add getbalances RPC (MarcoFalke)
fad13e925e197163a942f3f0d1ba2c95a2b65a56 rpcwallet: Make helper methods const on CWallet (MarcoFalke)
fad40ec9151248c6e8225e14980424f581d23e02 wallet: Use IsValidNumArgs in getwalletinfo rpc (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This exposes the `CWallet::GetBalance()` struct over RPC.
In the future, incorrectly named rpcs such as `getunconfirmedbalance` or rpcs redundant to this such as `getbalance` could be removed.
ACKs for commit facfb4:
jnewbery:
utACK facfb4111d14a3b06c46690a2cca7ca91cea8a96
Tree-SHA512: 1f54fedce55df9a8ea82d2b6265354b39a956072621876ebaee2355aac0e23c7b64340c3279502415598c095858529e18b50789be956250aafda1cd3a8d948a5
2b1641492fbf81e2c5a95f3e580811ca8700adc5 wallet: Improve CWallet:MarkDestinationsDirty (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Improve `CWallet:MarkDestinationsDirty` by skipping transactions that already have the cache invalidated. Skipping a transaction avoids at worst case extracting all output destinations.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
re-utACK 2b1641492fbf81e2c5a95f3e580811ca8700adc5
Tree-SHA512: 479dc2dde4b653b856e3d6a0c59a34fe33e963eb131a2d88552a8b30471b8725a087888fe5d7db6e4ee19b74072fe64441497f033be7d1931637f756e0d8fef5
6fc554f591d8ea1681b8bb25aa12da8d4f023f66 wallet: Reset reused transactions cache (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Fixes#17603 (together with #17824)
`getbalances` is using the cache within `GetAvailableCredit` under certain conditions [here](35fff5be60/src/wallet/wallet.cpp (L1826)). For a wallet with `avoid_reuse` activated this can lead to inconsistent reporting of `used` transactions/balances between `getbalances` and `listunspent` as pointed out in #17603. When an address is reused before the first transaction is spending from this address, the cache is not updated even after the transaction is sent. This means the remaining outputs at the reused address are not showing up as `used` in `getbalances`.
With this change, any newly incoming transaction belonging to the wallet marks all the other outputs at the same address as dirty.
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
Code review re-ACK 6fc554f591d8ea1681b8bb25aa12da8d4f023f66
promag:
ACK 6fc554f591d8ea1681b8bb25aa12da8d4f023f66.
achow101:
Re-ACK 6fc554f591d8ea1681b8bb25aa12da8d4f023f66
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 6fc554f591d8ea1681b8bb25aa12da8d4f023f66
Tree-SHA512: c4cad2c752176d16d77b4a4202291d20baddf9f27250896a40274d74a6945e0f6b34be04c2f9b1b2e756d3ac669b794969df8f82a98e0b16f10e92f276649ea2
1bb5d517aa616c1d5b5801d2ea36a2de5fb61eba test: add unit test for non-standard bare multisig txs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Approaches another missing unit test of issue #17394: Checks that the function `IsStandardTx()` returns rejection reason `"bare-multisig"` if any one of the outputs' scriptPubKey has bare multisignature format (i.e. `M <PubKey1> <PubKey2> ... <PubKeyN> N OP_CHECKSIG`, not P2SH!) and the policy flag `fIsBareMultisigStd` is set to false.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 1bb5d517aa
Tree-SHA512: d7c95e35da16520d6dcd2b4278e2426fedd13f68d1f23c90e85e929774e123fbfcfbccc26df6ad1c0dd61780896fa4b4b3d4e8280c647bb06df2bfcf2ba572fb
8f2d7737cc236b6122f30e31856eb3181960fba1 test: add functional test for non-standard txs with too large scriptSig (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Approaches another missing functional test of issue #17394 (counterpart to unit test in PR #17480, Commit 5e8a56348b): A transaction is rejected by the mempool with reason `"scriptsig-size"` if any of the inputs' scriptSig is larger than 1650 bytes.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 8f2d7737cc236b6122f30e31856eb3181960fba1
instagibbs:
ACK 8f2d7737cc
Tree-SHA512: 7a45b8a4181158be3e3b91756783ddf032f132ca8780dc35fac91b2df2149268f784d28ac56005135c4d86a357c57805c5a54b8155f0d049932844b18dc03992
5e8a56348b5e1026e9ddcae0b2fa2a68faf4439e test: add unit test for non-standard txs with too large scriptSig (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Approaches the first missing test of issue #17394: Checks that the function `IsStandardTx()` returns rejection reason `"scriptsig-size"` if any one the inputs' scriptSig is larger than 1650 bytes.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5e8a56348b5e1026e9ddcae0b2fa2a68faf4439e
instagibbs:
ACK 5e8a56348b
Tree-SHA512: 79977b12ddea9438a37cefdbb48cc551e4ad02a8ccfaa2d2837ced9f3a185e2e07cc366c243b9e3c7736245e90e315d7b4110efc6b440c63dbef7ee2c9d78a73
297e09855793feb94c3229ed989bef8b1eac864e Fix doxygen errors (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
These are all the remaining errors identified via -Werror=documentation, e.g.:
```
./rpc/rawtransaction_util.h:31:13: error: parameter 'prevTxs' not found in the function declaration [-Werror,-Wdocumentation]
* @param prevTxs Array of previous txns outputs that tx depends on but may not yet be in the block chain
^~~~~~~
./rpc/rawtransaction_util.h:31:13: note: did you mean 'prevTxsUnival'?
* @param prevTxs Array of previous txns outputs that tx depends on but may not yet be in the block chain
^~~~~~~
prevTxsUnival
netbase.cpp:766:11: error: parameter 'outProxyConnectionFailed[out]' not found in the function declaration [-Werror,-Wdocumentation]
* @param outProxyConnectionFailed[out] Whether or not the connection to the
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
netbase.cpp:766:11: note: did you mean 'outProxyConnectionFailed'?
* @param outProxyConnectionFailed[out] Whether or not the connection to the
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
outProxyConnectionFailed
```
You can use this to run with `-Wdocumentation` yourself: #14920
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 297e09855793feb94c3229ed989bef8b1eac864e
Tree-SHA512: a232d893b170873d923e77fa56c56a6567e7fd120b5af1f52cfeeae1093eec55621604cc80a523678f6fedc8bbb31228c4aa8dc2a630ce9ffc91525988522af7
e1c582cbaa4c094d204da34c3b1fdd0d4c557519 contrib: makeseeds: Read suspicious hosts from a file instead of hardcoding (Sanjay K)
Pull request description:
referring to: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17020
good first issue: reading SUSPICIOUS_HOSTS from a file.
I haven't changed the base hosts that were included in the original source, just made it readable from a file.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK e1c582cbaa4c094d204da34c3b1fdd0d4c557519 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 18684abc1c02cf52d63f6f6ecd98df01a9574a7c470524c37e152296504e2e3ffbabd6f3208214b62031512aeb809a6d37446af82c9f480ff14ce4c42c98e7c2
1be0b1fb2adcf95d76f879195564c0bf84162e31 test: add functional test for non-standard bare multisig txs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Approaches another missing functional test of issue #17394 (counterpart to unit test in PR #17502): A transaction is rejected by the mempool with reason `"bare-multisig"` if any of the outputs' scriptPubKey has bare multisig format (`M <PubKey1> <PubKey2> ... <PubKeyN> N OP_CHECKSIG`) and bitcoind is started with the argument `-permitbaremultisig=0`.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK 1be0b1fb2a
kristapsk:
ACK 1be0b1fb2adcf95d76f879195564c0bf84162e31
Tree-SHA512: 2cade68c4454029b62278b38d0f137c2605a0e4450c435cdda2833667234edd4406f017ed12fa8df9730618654acbaeb68b16dcabb9f5aa84bad9f1c76c6d476
831e1220bc151b1016412359775406b34cb8f52c build: remove double LIBBITCOIN_SERVER linking (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Seems that this is no longer required. Have tested building on macOS and Debian.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 831e1220bc151b1016412359775406b34cb8f52c.
practicalswift:
ACK 831e1220bc151b1016412359775406b34cb8f52c
laanwj:
ACK 831e1220bc151b1016412359775406b34cb8f52c
Tree-SHA512: d226d9fa0292189fae7e2af14781a511c3633f1352324f19ae642e941d06c34e2abf8b1df97d2330d76dba6024a93d8d341e02cc4882d7066f97e82585631fe1
168b781fe7f3f13b24c52a151f36de4cdd0a340a Continue relaying transactions after they expire from mapRelay (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
This change allows peers to request transactions even after they've expired from mapRelay and even if they're not doing mempool requests. This is intended to allow for CPFP of old transactions -- if parent tx P wasn't relayed due to low fees, then a higher fee rate child C is relayed, peers will currently request the parent P, but we prior to this patch, we will not relay it due to it not being in mapRelay.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 168b781fe7f3f13b24c52a151f36de4cdd0a340a (only change is comment fixup)
sdaftuar:
re-ACK 168b781fe7f3f13b24c52a151f36de4cdd0a340a
sipa:
ACK 168b781fe7f3f13b24c52a151f36de4cdd0a340a
Tree-SHA512: b206666dd1450cd0a161ae55fd1a7eda2c3d226842ba27d91fe463b551fd924b65b92551b14d6786692e15cf9a9a989666550dfc980b48ab0f8d4ca305bc7762
fa40e48c50d8ccf42ce5e66c12390e2ed4b60e75 ci: Remove unparseable lines from supp file for old xenial clang tsan (MarcoFalke)
fa1bfc476c9208a4c412c8ca74d05f52bb47766f ci: ubsan report_error_type=1 and add suppressions (MarcoFalke)
fa69cef13e5aab8264339eb3d50a9e89d59efd87 test: Print stderr when subprocess fails (MarcoFalke)
2222c305866a77065ab5be24c1c252bae252bb59 test: Use char instead of unsigned char (MarcoFalke)
faa8023ce9a47b282e1fac3ca8b3a7bb0042935a ci: Bump to clang-8 for asan build to avoid segfaults on ppc64le (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Use clang-8 instead of default clang (which is clang-6 on Bionic) to avoid spurious segfaults when running the ci system on ppc64le
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa40e48c50d8ccf42ce5e66c12390e2ed4b60e75 assuming Travis is happy -- diff looks correct :)
Tree-SHA512: f4f26232d3a0ef38da245869340f723d279a3db9823befbc735fb5a00024dae041c7306d7ae55d2488e6f86aa96cdea155b007aefb561fba505141e8dbc717dc
It's incorrect to convert between different enum classes using
initialisation.
However, it's OK to convert between different enum classes using the
same underlying type using static_cast.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
Co-authored-by: Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
acf8abc7f3cf7efa418a46f9f69f23f1a5035582 gui: Fix unintialized WalletView::progressDialog (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
#17911 shows that it's possible to read the unintialized `progressDialog` in f32564f0a7/src/qt/walletview.cpp (L296-L297).
And the debugger shows
```
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0000555556687c60 in QProgressDialog::wasCanceled() const ()
#1 0x000055555572989f in WalletView::showProgress (this=0x5555577d7a70,
title=..., nProgress=1) at qt/walletview.cpp:322
```
Closes#17911.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK acf8abc7f3cf7efa418a46f9f69f23f1a5035582, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
elichai:
utACK acf8abc7f3cf7efa418a46f9f69f23f1a5035582
kristapsk:
ACK acf8abc7f3cf7efa418a46f9f69f23f1a5035582
MarcoFalke:
ACK acf8abc7f3cf7efa418a46f9f69f23f1a5035582
Tree-SHA512: f5e6d873192d08d1a572e66e17c2e06d1ce27d01aa196b2a7ed591008641295bb02cda8ac90919ff2d2fc778316c2e143f8d36599e0d377779758853dfaf0a31
900d8f6f70859f528e84c5c38d0332f81d19df55 util: Disallow network-qualified command line options (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Previously these were allowed but ignored.
This change implements one of the settings simplifications listed in #17508. Change includes release notes.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 900d8f6f70859f528e84c5c38d0332f81d19df55
Tree-SHA512: ab020a16a86c1e8ec709fbf798d533879d32c565eceeb7eb785c33042c49c6b4d1108c5453d8166e4a2abffc2c8802fbb6d3b895e0ddeefa8f274fd647e3c8ad
ff59bcd3213ef61f2167c0aa60fcaf5afbc20c61 gui: Drop PeerTableModel dependency to ClientModel (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Class `PeerTableModel` doesn't actually depend on `ClientModel`.
ACKs for top commit:
Empact:
Code Review ACK ff59bcd321
hebasto:
ACK ff59bcd3213ef61f2167c0aa60fcaf5afbc20c61, tested on Linux Mint 19.3. No changes in behavior are observed.
Tree-SHA512: 29fa3c316c05b8f7b9340e5859bbb8c3a0b826aa7c865c892cfa13b5ad30f822fcaae4e01555f7860cd1727f20b7ef555a808235522a04a6eebaaa7b605f8595
0a50019fde7781263e0c8f041d1d9dcb0dee77e8 Walk pindexBestHeader back to ChainActive().Tip() if it is invalid (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Instead of keeping pindexBestHeader set to the best header we've
ever seen, reset it back to our validated tip if we find an ancestor
of it turns out to be invalid. While the name is now a bit confusing,
this matches much better with how it is used in practice, see below.
Further, this opens up more use-cases for it in the future, namely
aggressively searching for new peers in case we have discovered
(possibly via some covert channel) headers which we do not know to be
invalid, but which we cannot find block data for.
Places pindexBestHeader is used:
* Various GUI displays of the best header and getblockchaininfo["headers"],
I don't think changing this is bad, and if anything this is less confusing
in the presence of an invalid block.
* IsCurrentForFeeEstimation(): If anything I think ensuring pindexBestHeader
isn't some crazy invalid chain is better than the alternative, even in the
case where you are rejecting the current chain due to hardware error (since
hopefully in that case you won't get any new blocks anyway).
* ConnectBlock assumevalid checks: We use pindexBestHeader to check that the
block we're connecting leads to something with nMinimumChainWork (preventing
a user-set assumevalid from having bogus work) and that the block we're
connecting leads to pindexBestHeader (I'm not too worried about this one -
it's nice to "disable" assumevalid if we have a long invalid headers chain,
but I don't see it as a critical protection).
* BlockRequestAllowed() uses pindexBestHeader as its target to ensure the
requested block is within a month of the "current chain". I don't think this
is a meaningful difference, if we're rejecting the current tip we're
trivially fingerprintable anyway, and if the chain really does have a bunch
of invalid crap near the tip, using the best not-invalid header is likely a
better criteria.
* ProcessGetBlockData uses pindexBestHeader as the "current chain" definition
of whether a block request is "historical" for the purpose of bandwidth
limiting. Similarly, I don't see why this is a meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader for requesting missing headers on receipt of a
headers/compact block message or block inv as well as for initial getheaders.
I think this is definitely wrong, using the best not-invalid header for such
requests is much better.
* We use pindexBestHeader to define the "current chain" for deciding when
we're close to done with initial headers sync. I don't think this is a
meaningful change.
* We use pindexBestHeader to decide if initial headers sync has timed out. If
we're rejecting the chain due to hardware error this may result in
additional cases where we ban a peer, but this is already true, so I think
its fine.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
ACK 0a50019fde7781263e0c8f041d1d9dcb0dee77e8
kallewoof:
ACK 0a50019fde7781263e0c8f041d1d9dcb0dee77e8
ariard:
utACK 0a50019
Tree-SHA512: 2ecfa973a9878a00313ae7ede94a9bd7710e0caf55b544b10bbc46dc463a0478cbaf477e6cdd072356d5a0c5fb3848e9339284af785a2995c20bae8bd23f23e5
9a299a59cc8a9ab516e047356c5bc0e93774b557 net: reference instead of copy in BlockConnected range loop (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Reference elements in range for loop instead of copying them and
fix Clang `-Wrange-loop-analysis` warning introduced in a029e18
```
net_processing.cpp:1185:25: warning: loop variable 'ptx' of
type 'const std::shared_ptr<const CTransaction>' creates a copy from
type 'const std::shared_ptr<const CTransaction>' [-Wrange-loop-analysis]
for (const auto ptx : pblock->vtx) {
^
net_processing.cpp:1185:14: note: use reference type
'const std::shared_ptr<const CTransaction> &' to prevent copying
for (const auto ptx : pblock->vtx) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
```
ACKs for top commit:
Empact:
ACK 9a299a59cc
MarcoFalke:
ACK 9a299a59cc8a9ab516e047356c5bc0e93774b557
promag:
ACK 9a299a59cc8a9ab516e047356c5bc0e93774b557.
elichai:
ACK 9a299a59cc8a9ab516e047356c5bc0e93774b557
emilengler:
ACK 9a299a5.
Tree-SHA512: 9284d1b00684877505454a05071212758c8cea083534e2eec09bfc8a9c3059eea811d2008f6a5a678539444f0d5b3134db1bd23da6514b3d3a1440634c8b53be
