bitcoin#25454 introduces a 10 point penalty for remitting more than
MAX_BLOCKS_TO_ANNOUNCE unconnected block headers. Whether they are
connected or not is determined by taking the first entry and running
its hashPrevBlock through LookupBlockIndex. This new behaviour causes a
test failure in p2p_dos_header_tree.py in Dash.
Bitcoin doesn't face a test failure with this new behaviour as the first
non-fork block in its test data is the dump for block 1 (00000000b873e7
9784647a6c82962c70d228557d24a747ea4d1b8bbe878e1206) but Dash uses block
0 (00000bafbc94add76cb75e2ec92894837288a481e5c005f6563d91623bf8bc2c),
the genesis block.
By definition of a genesis block, it has a hashPrevBlock of 0, which
cannot be looked up. This trips the penalty. This doesn't cause any
problems in the field as nobody is expected to ever broadcast the
genesis block but it does cause a test failure for us.
We need to correct that by getting rid of the genesis block from the
test data.
this commit will not work with `--enable-c++20` as c++20 does away with
aggregate initialization when constructors are declared. a partial
backport of bitcoin#24169 will sort that out.
8e9dd127c7 chore: bump version in configure.ac (pasta)
afb8dc0698 docs: add v21.1.0 release notes and archive v21.0.2 (pasta)
269dd025e8 Merge #6179: chore: update manpages v21.1 (pasta)
a8cb643db8 Merge #6175: feat: allow resigning for EHF (pasta)
de5cc22b0c Merge #6178: chore: bump protocol version to 70233 (pasta)
2de4ce51b0 Merge #6176: test: reduce BRRHeight in regtest (pasta)
840175ecb4 Merge #6174: fix: stop trying to sign pending txes when they are no longer non-locked (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 058ff45772
kwvg:
utACK 058ff45772
Tree-SHA512: b619f9754258cece012f817a523f5849128e044ffbe17a28e12f1e8424d11f6a4c8d011a554fce0b106e1d6efee2aa306befdc034b8e47be077ad28c7f39c975
8e9dd127c7 chore: bump version in configure.ac (pasta)
afb8dc0698 docs: add v21.1.0 release notes and archive v21.0.2 (pasta)
269dd025e8 Merge #6179: chore: update manpages v21.1 (pasta)
a8cb643db8 Merge #6175: feat: allow resigning for EHF (pasta)
de5cc22b0c Merge #6178: chore: bump protocol version to 70233 (pasta)
2de4ce51b0 Merge #6176: test: reduce BRRHeight in regtest (pasta)
840175ecb4 Merge #6174: fix: stop trying to sign pending txes when they are no longer non-locked (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Backports for v21.1.0, add release notes and
## What was done?
See commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
Been on devnet
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 8e9dd127c7
Tree-SHA512: 3c968c4f0e06bc88f63bf10f742d39595c45c7fcd4aef1891d2e76d9f443cae1ddd3cb84c787faa189ef3a189a9dd63a7f75e69f5787a47d1281d5b6a445a2a6
d32a03c7e7 chore: update man pages (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
V21.1 preparation
## What was done?
Update manpages
## How Has This Been Tested?
n/a
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK d32a03c7e7
Tree-SHA512: a16036121c48597d80eefcf9232afb8f2da20d7b2e45de4beac31f025f3d8d638f5006e0bb52f706e08235fca172ddfc3309fd143734d37a14776cd7e8842128
d32a03c7e7 chore: update man pages (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
V21.1 preparation
## What was done?
Update manpages
## How Has This Been Tested?
n/a
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK d32a03c7e7
Tree-SHA512: a16036121c48597d80eefcf9232afb8f2da20d7b2e45de4beac31f025f3d8d638f5006e0bb52f706e08235fca172ddfc3309fd143734d37a14776cd7e8842128
6f82a56171 feat: add option to AsyncSignIfMember to allow signing same requestID on different msgHashes (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Please see: https://www.dash.org/forum/index.php?threads/ehf-activation-issues.55146/ for a description of this issue
## What was done?
Allow re-signing specifically for EHF messages, this is important as due to rotation, and duplicate requestIDs a member will refuse to re-sign when they participate in a later quorum.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Devnet deployed with a mix of this version, older versions and current v21.0
## Breaking Changes
This doesn't introduce any breaking changes
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: a758e6363901624d8540983ad09085d47a33fe61e8e576ec4317b051a0f988efb983bd06d9894bcce19c9f587ad703022ce00ceddd3760d7c9d382878f40c2d7
6f82a56171 feat: add option to AsyncSignIfMember to allow signing same requestID on different msgHashes (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Please see: https://www.dash.org/forum/index.php?threads/ehf-activation-issues.55146/ for a description of this issue
## What was done?
Allow re-signing specifically for EHF messages, this is important as due to rotation, and duplicate requestIDs a member will refuse to re-sign when they participate in a later quorum.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Devnet deployed with a mix of this version, older versions and current v21.0
## Breaking Changes
This doesn't introduce any breaking changes
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: a758e6363901624d8540983ad09085d47a33fe61e8e576ec4317b051a0f988efb983bd06d9894bcce19c9f587ad703022ce00ceddd3760d7c9d382878f40c2d7
3783b70129 chore: bump protocol version to 70233 (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Bumped protocol version to 70233
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 3783b70129
knst:
utACK 3783b70129
Tree-SHA512: 3f5f04fcc31c5381a1ddce408a3c31876ca6d58ff229c80784ab938be70c3820b773c5db7f0c77fb7a00cc03dbefb70a42b81a0bf17195b78b47cee1e12310b5
38ecd6f951 test: reduce BRRHeight on regtest (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
In regtest, Block Reward Reallocation is buried at height 2500, which happens after v20 activation.
## What was done?
Reduced BRRHeight in regtest from 2500 to 1000.
The purpose of this change is to simplify regtests of Platform as well.
Note: This change affects only regtest.
## How Has This Been Tested?
tests
## Breaking Changes
no, this only affects Regtest (where we make no guarantees about breaking stuff)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: b5a1c2b2c2b70682f266d9d0af9e048a03417c0cb2480eb5ab5838965342b6465acd10d8dac5a0d3c5c5f59f4e36ac5b909a838bc3805c2265a83776e92b4827
d8449aecf9 fix: stop trying to sign pending txes when they are no longer non-locked (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Masternodes keep trying to sign txes they received initially even after these txes were replaced by is/chain-locked txes later.
## What was done?
Remove entries from `pendingRetryTxs` when txes are removed from `nonLockedTxs` set (as either already locked or as conflicted, doesn't matter).
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK d8449aecf9
knst:
utACK d8449aecf9
Tree-SHA512: 45983faad6d590d4e44fc195c77d73d216e3d0bebef963fe556688773c82c07a118916f56fde7f1213df19d4fb9b7d82d8fd51abecd8e6c2108c27d62d0426c1
3783b70129 chore: bump protocol version to 70233 (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Bumped protocol version to 70233
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 3783b70129
knst:
utACK 3783b70129
Tree-SHA512: 3f5f04fcc31c5381a1ddce408a3c31876ca6d58ff229c80784ab938be70c3820b773c5db7f0c77fb7a00cc03dbefb70a42b81a0bf17195b78b47cee1e12310b5
38ecd6f951 test: reduce BRRHeight on regtest (Odysseas Gabrielides)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
In regtest, Block Reward Reallocation is buried at height 2500, which happens after v20 activation.
## What was done?
Reduced BRRHeight in regtest from 2500 to 1000.
The purpose of this change is to simplify regtests of Platform as well.
Note: This change affects only regtest.
## How Has This Been Tested?
tests
## Breaking Changes
no, this only affects Regtest (where we make no guarantees about breaking stuff)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: b5a1c2b2c2b70682f266d9d0af9e048a03417c0cb2480eb5ab5838965342b6465acd10d8dac5a0d3c5c5f59f4e36ac5b909a838bc3805c2265a83776e92b4827
0f239203a8 partial bitcoin#24169: Add --enable-c++20 option (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
a3b79267e0 merge bitcoin#20744: Use std::filesystem. Remove Boost Filesystem & System (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
be7ac493d0 merge bitcoin#24167: consistently use fsbridge:: for ifstream / ofstream (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7ffea4348f merge bitcoin#24104: Make compatible with boost 1.78 (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
7c270e6883 merge bitcoin#24026: Block unsafe std::string fs::path conversion copy_file calls (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
b0d2484a0b merge bitcoin#23522: Improve fs::PathToString documentation (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
20d359b570 partial bitcoin#23469: Remove Boost build note from build-unix.md (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
193f6fde2e merge bitcoin#23446: Mention that BerkeleyDB is for legacy wallet in build-unix (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
ecfac10b8e merge bitcoin#22937: Forbid calling unsafe fs::path(std::string) constructor and fs::path::string() method (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
23fe7e2f07 chore: dashify symbols in some unit tests (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
28b96a071d merge bitcoin#22840: fix unoptimized libraries in depends (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Depends on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6085
* Depends on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6137
* Dependency for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6150
## Breaking Changes
None observed.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK 0f239203a8
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 0f239203a8
Tree-SHA512: 4b8f0ae55185ece27d8084a5339196b7ed993c8138f4c59a0db3e16729d4edf4a59a68a8c7309c32df57734c07182821c4878b55c253da5df763204ad7158426
21f174aff1 feat: improve query categorisation in Qt App (Konstantin Akimov)
c863473286 test: add spending asset unlock tx in functional tests (Konstantin Akimov)
1fb67ece0e feat: make a support of Qt app to show Platform Transfer transaction as a new type of transaction (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Transfers from platform have incorrectly shown amount in Dash Core wallet app.
They also shown in Qt app as self-send that is not completely true.
## What was done?
Added new type of transaction to Qt App, added a filter for its type, fixed calculation of output for tx records.
As well added a new type of transaction `platform-transfer` in rpc output of `gettransaction` RPC
## How Has This Been Tested?
Make a Platform Transfer transaction on RegTest and check it in Dash Core
![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/16c83f09-724f-4b8b-99c8-9bb0df1428da)
Helper to see it: export dpath=/tmp/dash_func_test_PATHPATH/ ; src/qt/dash-qt -regtest -conf=$dpath/node0/dash.conf -datadir=$dpath/node0/ -debug=0 -debuglogfile=/dev/stdout
## Breaking Changes
There's new type of transaction "platform-transfer" in rpc output of `gettransaction`.
**This PR DOES NOT change any consensus rules.**
Breaking changes that makes withdrawal transaction immature is moved to https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6128
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ec2a54a910f121ad30ff8e94cf17080b5b3c651872e9bc3de9ec0924ca7f7a0e526b74b05cde26aaf860e3809e67f66142112319a69c216527e5bcb1b8a2b8f6
f22ade31b9 tests: more strict test for withrawal 1000 and minor improvements (UdjinM6)
4ad18f64f5 fix: properly test hard limit of 1000 dash (Konstantin Akimov)
a2fe2b27d9 test: minor improvements for credit pool functional test (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
DIP for Credit Pool says:
```
The withdrawal should not be mined if:
* It requests more DASH than the credit pool contains
* It requests more than 1000 DASH
* The credit pool contains more than 1000 DASH, and the withdrawal would result in more than a 10% reduction in the credit pool over the 576-block window
* The credit pool contains less than 1000 DASH, and the withdrawal would result in more than 100 DASH being removed from the pool over the 576-block window
```
Though, current functional test for asset locks improperly test this case, because threshold for big withdrawal happens by 10%, not 1000 dash.
## What was done?
Improvements for functional asset lock test to actually test a limit 1000 dash, not just 10%
## How Has This Been Tested?
See changes
## Breaking Changes
N/A, changes only for tests
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK f22ade31b9
Tree-SHA512: 2fdbfa85a3fc41683d68d1577916178ad686ccf0fba6abb22dc84a7ad69e0d44f876e371a24935c5167baa5491000662cc98cc1cd205e3817f0ffc65d2b4953d
b73f48f3b9 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22057: test: use MiniWallet (P2PK mode) for feature_dersig.py (MarcoFalke)
d5a8d5e6a0 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22048: test: MiniWallet: introduce enum type for output mode (MarcoFalke)
f4cd20b115 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21945: test: add P2PK support to MiniWallet (MarcoFalke)
7be6db6dca docs: add an explanation for vsize in MiniWallet (Konstantin Akimov)
5d10b41302 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21840: test: Misc refactor to get rid of &foo[0] raw pointers (MarcoFalke)
7522ee9868 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21900: test: use MiniWallet for feature_csv_activation.py (MarcoFalke)
c6f603c26f Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21897: rpc: adjust incorrect RPCHelpMan types (MarcoFalke)
1dffe3ab9f Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21867: test: use MiniWallet for p2p_blocksonly.py (MarcoFalke)
81d21eea14 Merge #21557: test: small cleanup in RPCNestedTests tests (MarcoFalke)
cc169c2457 partial Merge #20842: docs: consolidate typo & url fixing (MarcoFalke)
2be1604405 Merge #20459: rpc: Fail to return undocumented return values (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
## What was done?
Backports from v22 bitcoin.
Mostly related to MiniWallet and RPC improvements, see commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK b73f48f3b9
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK b73f48f3b9
Tree-SHA512: 588f3a30697c0d77dadcc463aba71a00bf26eeef41b0cb8b9197799a217ebeb1d1ce7b5021ccc4576f0e9ca0e75ad840820cdc682fe8f120596788a528727a0b
d8449aecf9 fix: stop trying to sign pending txes when they are no longer non-locked (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Masternodes keep trying to sign txes they received initially even after these txes were replaced by is/chain-locked txes later.
## What was done?
Remove entries from `pendingRetryTxs` when txes are removed from `nonLockedTxs` set (as either already locked or as conflicted, doesn't matter).
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK d8449aecf9
knst:
utACK d8449aecf9
Tree-SHA512: 45983faad6d590d4e44fc195c77d73d216e3d0bebef963fe556688773c82c07a118916f56fde7f1213df19d4fb9b7d82d8fd51abecd8e6c2108c27d62d0426c1