Commit Graph

26357 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
pasta
dad9ff1108
Merge #6103: backport: bitcoin#18638
1840c9441a fix: drop extra pings - follow up for #18638 (UdjinM6)
264e7f9e62 Merge #18638: net: Use mockable time for ping/pong, add tests (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Split from https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6102

  ## What was done?
  So far as bitcoin#19499 is backported, bitcoin#18638 can be finished and removed related workarounds.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Run unit/functional tests

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK 1840c9441a
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK 1840c9441a

Tree-SHA512: f34657c14514d6ee596175b3faf9ee44e58e8b0339939a0708d58ab2d119786830c183f9b236ed87c08ef8e1dbd031a38fc596b5aa4d38e10521658df4330e79
2024-07-15 10:57:09 -05:00
pasta
67b092255e
Merge #6102: fix: TODO related fixes for post-v21 release
d3e842f605 refactor: remove dead code which has no use since composite commands are refactored (Konstantin Akimov)
58c5d431fe fix: follow-up to #6017 - enable one more assert in wallet_descriptor test (Konstantin Akimov)
dbed4a31af fix: update comment for wallet_keypool_hd due to bitcoin#17681 DNM (Konstantin Akimov)
4741bcc5c3 chore: remove outdated todo - removed by bitcoin#16898 (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Multiple TODO is reviewed and fixes in this PR

  ## What was done?
  See commits

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Run unit/functional tests

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK d3e842f605
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK d3e842f605

Tree-SHA512: 25080abcce8fa3dbb4e4c71d321b24cb9d23c073e6caf75366be58623023af50d28bc1cdac4098eb78a87b4fe0f3c33d39bb06257f0590b3e42e5fcad161ea2d
2024-07-15 10:52:50 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
252ffee815
fix: adjust doxygen for dash codebase for -Wdocumentation 2024-07-13 01:58:21 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
4f260cd4b1
fix: ignore warnings for dashbls/ 2024-07-13 01:57:39 +07:00
fanquake
0afffcccc4
Merge #21613: build: enable -Wdocumentation
a4e970adb6de8425025ae3f62fb89d9e27a8ab1f build: enable -Wdocumentation if suppressing external warnings (fanquake)
3b0078f958c46e94b468c829522ba965f5549f11 doc: fixup -Wdocumentation issues (fanquake)
c6edcf1c710e4aaf1cafdbf8e86fe209b57bdeb8 build: suppress libevent warnings if supressing external warnings (fanquake)

Pull request description:

  Enable `-Wdocumentation` by taking advantage of our `--enable-suppress-external-warnings` flag. Most of the CIs are using this flag now, so any regressions should be caught.

  This also required modifying libevents flags when suppressing warnings, as depending on the version being built against, that could generate a large number of warnings. i.e:
  ```bash
  In file included from httpserver.cpp:34:
  In file included from ./support/events.h:12:
  /usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:464:11: warning: parameter 'req' not found in the function declaration [-Wdocumentation]
     @param req a request object
            ^~~
  /usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:465:11: warning: parameter 'databuf' not found in the function declaration [-Wdocumentation]
     @param databuf the data chunk to send as part of the reply.
            ^~~~~~~
  /usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:467:11: warning: parameter 'call' not found in the function declaration [-Wdocumentation]
     @param call back's argument.
            ^~~~
  /usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:939:4: warning: declaration is marked with '@deprecated' command but does not have a deprecation attribute [-Wdocumentation-deprecated-sync]
    @deprecated  This function is deprecated; you probably want to use
    ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  /usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:946:1: note: add a deprecation attribute to the declaration to silence this warning
  char *evhttp_decode_uri(const char *uri);
  ^
  __AVAILABILITY_INTERNAL_DEPRECATED
  /usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:979:5: warning: declaration is marked with '@deprecated' command but does not have a deprecation attribute [-Wdocumentation-deprecated-sync]
     @deprecated This function is deprecated as of Libevent 2.0.9.  Use
     ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  /usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:987:1: note: add a deprecation attribute to the declaration to silence this warning
  int evhttp_parse_query(const char *uri, struct evkeyvalq *headers);
  ^
  __AVAILABILITY_INTERNAL_DEPRECATED
  /usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:1002:11: warning: parameter 'query_parse' not found in the function declaration [-Wdocumentation]
     @param query_parse the query portion of the URI
            ^~~~~~~~~~~
  /usr/local/Cellar/libevent/2.1.12/include/event2/http.h:1002:11: note: did you mean 'uri'?
     @param query_parse the query portion of the URI
            ^~~~~~~~~~~
            uri
  69 warnings generated.
  ```

  Note that a lot of these have already been fixed upstream.

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Concept and code review ACK a4e970adb6de8425025ae3f62fb89d9e27a8ab1f
  practicalswift:
    cr ACK a4e970adb6de8425025ae3f62fb89d9e27a8ab1f: automatic compiler feedback comes sooner and is more reliable than manual reviewer feedback
  jonatack:
    Light ACK a4e970adb6de8425025ae3f62fb89d9e27a8ab1f skimmed the changes, clang 11 build is clean with the change, verified -Wdocumentation build warnings with this change when a doc fix was reverted

Tree-SHA512: 57a1e30cffcc8bcceee72d85f58ebe29eae525861c70acb237541bd480c51ede89875c033042c0af376fdbb49fb7f588ef9282a47c6e78f9d4501c41f1b21eb6
2024-07-13 00:41:25 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
e65984e173
refactor: remove unused includes from unit tests 2024-07-13 00:13:10 +07:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
bbc99571f3
fix: sidestep c++17 std::unary_function removal by compiling boost with c++11
we can revert this after upgrading to boost 1.81
2024-07-11 19:00:02 +00:00
Konstantin Akimov
85abbb97b4
chore: add release notes for composite command for whitelist 2024-07-12 00:07:55 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
78ad778bb0
feat: test composite commands in functional test for whitelist 2024-07-12 00:07:54 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
a102a59787
feat: add support of composite commands in RPC'c whitelists 2024-07-12 00:07:53 +07:00
pasta
9456d0761d
Merge #6073: feat: add logging for RPC HTTP requests: command, user, http-code, time of running
1a691bd100 feat: add logging for RPC HTTP requests: command, user, http-code, time of running (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Currently there is no way to gather stats for http rpc in dash core. This PR aim to change it.

  ## What was done?
  Implemented some basic stats for each RPC request:
   - rpc command
   - flag "is external"
   - http status
   - time to serve query (rpc time, not http time)

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  See new logs:
  ```log
  [httpworker.0] [httprpc.cpp:100] [~RpcHttpRequest] -- HTTP RPC request handled: user=platform-user command=getbestblockhash is_external=false status=200 elapsed_time_ms=0
  [httpworker.2] [httprpc.cpp:100] [~RpcHttpRequest] -- HTTP RPC request handled: user=platform-user command=quorum is_external=false status=500 elapsed_time_ms=0
  [httpworker.3] [httprpc.cpp:100] [~RpcHttpRequest] -- HTTP RPC request handled: user=platform-user command= is_external=false status=401 elapsed_time_ms=0
  [httpworker.3] [httprpc.cpp:100] [~RpcHttpRequest] -- HTTP RPC request handled: user=platform-user command=getbestblockhash is_external=true status=200 elapsed_time_ms=28
  [httpworker.0] [httprpc.cpp:100] [~RpcHttpRequest] -- HTTP RPC request handled: user=operator command=getbestblockhash is_external=false status=200 elapsed_time_ms=0
  ```

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A
  It doesn't change behavior of rpc server and http server.

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK 1a691bd100

Tree-SHA512: b62fceedb9a901e87c23c4aa6e6dfa7226d44da84a081ea245b40e7ff887103302147cebe0f7ff90bf9c8d4fa9ecafbaa6f25f39d2008f62c4f2beeef2877b57
2024-07-11 11:38:27 -05:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
3c622a3916
revert: partial dash#5610 (make depends compilable with Xcode 15 on macos)
reverted commit:
- aa7ba58804
2024-07-11 16:37:03 +00:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
f15e1db477
fix: make std::unary_function suppression flag no longer contingent on --enable-suppress-external-warnings
This is in line with how it's done in 880d4aaf upstream. This wasn't
noticed with CI as we build with `--enable-suppress-external-warnings`
by default.
2024-07-11 16:37:02 +00:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
5db84e2a5b
revert: partial dash#3003 (Fix 2 common Travis failures which happen when Travis has network issues)
commits reverted:
- 9a45241621
- 41f46f5ea6
2024-07-11 16:31:07 +00:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
89ade3e340
rpc: disallow coinjoin stop if there's no CoinJoin session to stop 2024-07-11 16:16:41 +00:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
51b6b94fc0
rpc: make coinjoin a composite command 2024-07-11 16:16:41 +00:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
b7c7bff6e0
rpc: remove keypool replenishment stat and warning for descriptor wallet 2024-07-11 11:27:40 +00:00
Konstantin Akimov
2db69d7b81
chore: add release notes for "quorum platformsign" 2024-07-11 12:26:52 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
283c5f89a2
feat: create new composite command "quorum platformsign"
This composite command let to limit quorum type for signing for case of whitelist
After that old way to limit platform commands can be deprecated
2024-07-11 12:25:50 +07:00
UdjinM6
1840c9441a
fix: drop extra pings - follow up for #18638 2024-07-09 21:46:28 +07:00
pasta
1f113587fb
Merge #6101: fix: cppcheck warnings
3d8ff0cd2d fix: cppcheck warning about coinst in rpc/coinjoin (Konstantin Akimov)
63dfdd7d42 fix: workaround for buggy cppcheck in masternode/utils (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

  `cppcheck 2.11` on my localhost returns 2 failures, that are not caught by our CI, probably due to difference in version:

      ```
      src/rpc/coinjoin.cpp:73:28: warning: Variable 'chainman' can be declared as reference to const [constVariableReference]
       src/masternode/utils.cpp:0:0: warning: Internal Error. MathLib::toLongNumber: input was not completely consumed: 5s [cppcheckError]

      Advice not applicable in this specific case? Add an exception by updating
      IGNORED_WARNINGS in test/lint/lint-cppcheck-dash.sh
      ```

  ## What was done?
  Adds missing const, workaround for probably a crash in cppcheck 2.11.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Run `test/lint/lint-cppcheck-dash.sh`

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK 3d8ff0cd2d
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK 3d8ff0cd2d

Tree-SHA512: c4c7e839161a6eb8d7a25b48cd05914d94dc4e4a6d53cbd39728a74a39d626d9b533afd98a9803550d2754df5c86445e5157e0e48853af52ea5ea5cb2e15d97b
2024-07-09 09:38:47 -05:00
pasta
4f5991f151
Merge #6092: fix: mixing for partially unlocked descriptor wallets
c944908399 refactor: simplify implementation of function CWallet::IsLocked (Konstantin Akimov)
685cf34cb9 fix: unlock descriptor wallet for mixing-only (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  As [noticed by kwvg](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6090#pullrequestreview-2153639183), mixing doesn't work with descriptor wallets if do "unlock only for mixing". This PR is aiming to fix this issue.
  https://github.com/dashpay/dash-issues/issues/59

  ## What was done?
  Removed default argument "bool mixing = false" from WalletStorage interface,
  Refactored a logic of CWallet::IsLocked to make it shorter, clearer and unified with bitcoin.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  A. Run Dash-Qt with descriptor wallet, run mixing, enter passphrase.
  The wallet is partially unlocked (for mixing only) - possible to see yellow lock in status. Mixing happens.
  B. Open "send transaction dialog", try to send a transaction: the app asks password to unlock wallet as expected.

  Though, I am not sure how exactly to test that **all** rpc are indeed locked when descriptor wallet is unlocked for mixing only.

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    LGTM, ~utACK~ light ACK c944908399
  kwvg:
    ACK c944908399
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK c944908399

Tree-SHA512: 236c895dd75042449282b051e90781ace1c941a3b2c34bb29ddadb6e62ba9c8d57c2a677ed98847630ff7fb6df4e14d2b59f3473d8f299ec104afeeb8103930c
2024-07-09 09:37:45 -05:00
pasta
38249a525c
Merge #6096: feat: split type of error in submitchainlock - return enum in CL verifying code
0133c9866d feat: add functional test for submitchainlock far ahead in future (Konstantin Akimov)
6004e06769 feat: return enum in RecoveredSig verifying code, apply for RPC submitchainlock (Konstantin Akimov)
130b6d1e96 refactor: replace static private member method to static method (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Currently by result of `submitchainlock` impossible to distinct a situation when a signature is invalid and when a core is far behind and just doesn't know about signing quorum yet.

  This PR aims to fix this issue, as requested by shumkov for needs of platform:

  > mailformed signature and can’t verify signature due to unknown quorum is the same error?
  > possible to distingush ?

  ## What was done?
  Return enum in CL verifying code `chainlock_handler.VerifyChainLock`.
  The RPC `submitchainlock` now returns error with code=-1 and message `no quorum found. Current tip height: {N} hash: {HASH}`

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Functional test `feature_llmq_chainlocks.py` is updated

  ## Breaking Changes
  `submitchainlock` return one more error code - not really a breaking change though, because v21 hasn't released yet.

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK 0133c9866d
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK 0133c9866d

Tree-SHA512: 794ba410efa57aaa66c47a67914deed97c1d060326e5d11a722c9233a8447f5e9215aa4a5ca401cb2199b8fc445144b2b2a692fc35494bf3296a74e9e115bda7
2024-07-09 09:12:40 -05:00
pasta
154bdd43a0
Merge #6104: fix: adjust incorrect parameter description that says there is a default that doesn't exist
60e36b786a fix: adjust incorrect parameter description that says there is a default that doesn't exist (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  This default doesn't actually exist in code.

  ## What was done?
  Remove default from text

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes
  None

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK 60e36b786a

Tree-SHA512: 658eb2cf101d0450619461b7ffe6069de5c04c1fdcca216713f9374cc1e60413ec9b96c3a2931fb69a4c2f8277dd6677100270960a58197da3b92dffb1e9e327
2024-07-08 18:44:00 -05:00
pasta
50a3b7c552
Merge #6095: fix: createwallet to require 'load_on_startup' for descriptor wallets
a42e9df06f fix: createwallet to require 'load_on_startup' for descriptor wallets (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

  RPC `createwallet` has changed list of arguments: `createwallet "wallet_name" ( disable_private_keys blank "passphrase" avoid_reuse descriptors load_on_startup )` since https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5965
  `load_on_startup` used to be an argument 5 but now it has a number 6. Both arguments 5 and 6 are boolean and it can confuse an user: they may even not notice that something wrong when it meant to be "load on startup" but got "descriptor wallet" which is not expected.

  See also previous attempt to resolve issue: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6029

  ## What was done?
  To prevent confusion if user is not aware about this breaking changes, the RPC createwallet throws an exception if user trying to create descriptor wallet but has not mentioned load_on_startup. This requirement can be removed when major amount of users updated to v21.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Run unit/functional tests

  Tested with CLI:
  ```
  $ createwallet "tmp-create" true true "" false true
  RPC createwallet would not accept creating descriptor wallets without specifying 'load_on_startup' flag. It is required explicitly in v21 due to breaking changes in createwallet RPC (code -8)
  $ createwallet "tmp-create" true true "" false true true
  {
    "name": "tmp-create",
    "warning": "Empty string given as passphrase, wallet will not be encrypted.\nWallet is an experimental descriptor wallet"
  }
  ```

  ## Breaking Changes
  You can't more pass 'descriptor=NN' without  https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5965 which has not been released yet.

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK a42e9df06f
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK a42e9df06f
  thephez:
    utACK a42e9df06f

Tree-SHA512: bf57fed40d04a32e756e4f8bfabbe39c0cbf87275546c92f4efc19523bc3c5dd3ddc5a884d67285971dc301a6c5808bef979db52c35645ca2db0810046fe1bdc
2024-07-08 12:55:50 -05:00
pasta
60e36b786a
fix: adjust incorrect parameter description that says there is a default that doesn't exist 2024-07-08 12:53:26 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
0133c9866d
feat: add functional test for submitchainlock far ahead in future 2024-07-09 00:10:07 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
6004e06769
feat: return enum in RecoveredSig verifying code, apply for RPC submitchainlock
It helps to detect case of Tip is way too far behind: the signature can be
still valid but core can't verify it yet but later it may become a valid signature.
2024-07-09 00:09:49 +07:00
MarcoFalke
264e7f9e62
Merge #18638: net: Use mockable time for ping/pong, add tests
fa3365430c5fb57d7c0b5f2bce9fbbe290be93c3 net: Use mockable time for ping/pong, add tests (MarcoFalke)
faab4aaf2fa1153c6d76efc8113fa01b06943ece util: Add count_microseconds helper (MarcoFalke)

Pull request description:

  Switch `CNode::m_ping_start` and `CNetMessage::m_time` to mockable time, so that tests can be added.

  Mockable time is also type-safe, since it uses `std::chrono`

ACKs for top commit:
  jonatack:
    Code review re-ACK fa33654 re-read code, verified rebase per `git range-diff 4b5c919 fa94d6f fa33654`, previous tested ACKs still valid
  troygiorshev:
    ACK fa3365430c5fb57d7c0b5f2bce9fbbe290be93c3

Tree-SHA512: 7d632bd6019ce7c882029e71b667a61517e783af82755a85dd979ef09380934e172dec8b8f91d57b200a30a6e096aeaf01f19fee7f3aed0e0e871c72eb44d70e
2024-07-08 23:57:01 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
d3e842f605
refactor: remove dead code which has no use since composite commands are refactored 2024-07-08 23:53:00 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
58c5d431fe
fix: follow-up to #6017 - enable one more assert in wallet_descriptor test 2024-07-08 23:23:45 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
dbed4a31af
fix: update comment for wallet_keypool_hd due to bitcoin#17681 DNM 2024-07-08 23:23:45 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
3d8ff0cd2d
fix: cppcheck warning about coinst in rpc/coinjoin
It fixes this failure:
```
src/rpc/coinjoin.cpp:73:28: warning: Variable 'chainman' can be declared as reference to const [constVariableReference]

Advice not applicable in this specific case? Add an exception by updating
IGNORED_WARNINGS in test/lint/lint-cppcheck-dash.sh
```
2024-07-08 20:32:40 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
63dfdd7d42
fix: workaround for buggy cppcheck in masternode/utils
It shows this error:
```
src/masternode/utils.cpp:0:0: warning: Internal Error. MathLib::toLongNumber: input was not completely consumed: 5s [cppcheckError]

Advice not applicable in this specific case? Add an exception by updating
IGNORED_WARNINGS in test/lint/lint-cppcheck-dash.sh
```

It doesn't seems as error in our code, but I don't like this warning
2024-07-08 20:31:18 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
4741bcc5c3
chore: remove outdated todo - removed by bitcoin#16898 2024-07-08 18:23:22 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
a42e9df06f
fix: createwallet to require 'load_on_startup' for descriptor wallets
createwallet has changed list of arguments: createwallet "wallet_name" ( disable_private_keys blank "passphrase" avoid_reuse descriptors load_on_startup )
load_on_startup used to be an argument 5 but now has a number 6.
Both arguments 5 and 6 are boolean and it can confuse an user.

To prevent confusion if user is not aware about this breaking changes,
the RPC createwallet throws an exception if user trying to create descriptor wallet but has not mentioned load_on_startup.
This requirement can be removed when major amount of users updated to v21
2024-07-07 21:56:16 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
130b6d1e96
refactor: replace static private member method to static method 2024-07-05 16:13:05 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
c72ec70fdf
feat: implement governance RPCs votealias and votemany for descriptor wallets 2024-07-05 15:37:29 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
490832959d
refactor: new method to generate a signing message in CGovernanceVote 2024-07-05 01:35:34 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
c944908399
refactor: simplify implementation of function CWallet::IsLocked 2024-07-03 15:35:29 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
685cf34cb9
fix: unlock descriptor wallet for mixing-only 2024-07-03 15:35:28 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
c04214fce8
fix: move cpp file of ehf_signals from headers to libbitcoin_server SOURCES 2024-07-03 13:23:37 +07:00
pasta
6e5d3f1d1f
Merge #6090: fix: auto backup issue with descriptor wallets for CJ
bebea4b9b6 fix: auto backup issue with descriptor wallets for CJ (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Qt CoinJoin session has problems (https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5579#pullrequestreview-1912946808):
   - Autobackup problems
   - False keypool depletion reporting

  https://github.com/dashpay/dash-issues/issues/59

  ## What was done?
  Disables check for "remaining keys left" and "auto-backups" for non-legacy wallet.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Run unit/functional test
  Try to run CJ mixing for descriptor wallet.

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK bebea4b9b6

Tree-SHA512: 610551001d054c447ddca9451ac6d94f3d063ecf3ccfab437d99324efc5f99ff86e59d80a36f4ff4983d3c8107aa19292c021cb3210fcf51e79919387169c414
2024-07-02 08:47:24 -05:00
pasta
85ba35c6f5
Merge #6088: feat: add a marker experimental for descriptor wallets
684503db6b feat: add a marker experimental for descriptor wallets (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Descriptor wallets pass most of functional tests now, but they are not really tested in-the-real-environment by multiple users.

  ## What was done?
  Add a marker "experimental" for 'createwallet' rpc, for create wallet UI form.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Run and check

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK 684503db6b

Tree-SHA512: e843e5b8080c7cd4273ea532038f3ec65e0260419b2c2a3db07ee1fadd856a7ce47f367705b4ddb19c5fc91cee5a529a54d580dbf53428c3e5e8b433c96ec0c9
2024-07-02 08:43:56 -05:00
pasta
f33474240e
Merge #6089: fix: crash if try to upgradetohd descriptor wallet
e708a4b047 fix: crash if try to upgradetohd descriptor wallet (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

  If `upgradetohd` is called for blank descriptor wallet it can cause a crash:
  ```
  Posix Signal: Segmentation fault
     0#: (0x55A0C7658814) stl_vector.h:115        - std::_Vector_base<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> >::_Vector_impl_data::_M_copy_data(std::_Vector_base<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> >::_Vector_impl_data const&)
     1#: (0x55A0C7658814) stl_vector.h:127        - std::_Vector_base<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> >::_Vector_impl_data::_M_swap_data(std::_Vector_base<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> >::_Vector_impl_data&)
     2#: (0x55A0C7658814) stl_vector.h:1959       - std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> >::_M_move_assign(std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> >&&, std::integral_constant<bool, true>)
     3#: (0x55A0C7658814) stl_vector.h:768        - std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> >::operator=(std::vector<unsigned long, std::allocator<unsigned long> >&&)
     4#: (0x55A0C7658814) stacktraces.cpp:777     - HandlePosixSignal
     5#: (0x744F89C42990) libc_sigaction.c        - ???
     6#: (0x55A0C7789926) scriptpubkeyman.cpp:418 - LegacyScriptPubKeyMan::GenerateNewHDChain(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, secure_allocator<char> > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, secure_allocator<char> > const&)
     7#: (0x55A0C77BEC2E) wallet.cpp:5033         - CWallet::UpgradeToHD(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, secure_allocator<char> > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, secure_allocator<char> > const&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, secure_allocator<char> > const&, bilingual_str&)
     8#: (0x55A0C775B85F) rpcwallet.cpp:2839      - operator()
     9#: (0x55A0C775BBB4) std_function.h:292      - _M_invoke
    10#: (0x55A0C72D4BC2) univalue.h:17           - UniValue::operator=(UniValue&&)
    11#: (0x55A0C72D4BC2) server.h:110            - CRPCCommand::CRPCCommand(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, RPCHelpMan (*)(), std::vector<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::allocator<std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >)::{lambda(JSONRPCRequest const&, UniValue&, bool)#1}::operator()(JSONRPCRequest const&, UniValue&, bool) const
    12#: (0x55A0C76ED57C) basic_string.h:792      - std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string()
    13#: (0x55A0C76ED57C) request.h:29            - JSONRPCRequest::~JSONRPCRequest()
    14#: (0x55A0C76ED57C) interfaces.cpp:576      - operator()
    15#: (0x55A0C723B3D9) std_function.h:292      - _M_invoke
    16#: (0x55A0C73D4FFC) std_function.h:591      - std::function<bool (JSONRPCRequest const&, UniValue&, bool)>::operator()(JSONRPCRequest const&, UniValue&, bool) const
    17#: (0x55A0C73D4FFC) server.cpp:609          - ExecuteCommand
    18#: (0x55A0C73D4FFC) server.cpp:528          - CRPCTable::execute(JSONRPCRequest const&) const
    19#: (0x55A0C72421FB) basic_string.h:223      - std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_data() const
    20#: (0x55A0C72421FB) basic_string.h:264      - std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_is_local() const
    21#: (0x55A0C72421FB) basic_string.h:282      - std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_dispose()
    22#: (0x55A0C72421FB) basic_string.h:792      - std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::~basic_string()
    23#: (0x55A0C72421FB) request.h:29            - JSONRPCRequest::~JSONRPCRequest()
    24#: (0x55A0C72421FB) interfaces.cpp:487      - executeRpc
    25#: (0x55A0C6F37700) univalue.h:17           - UniValue::operator=(UniValue&&)
    26#: (0x55A0C6F37700) rpcconsole.cpp:338      - RPCConsole::RPCParseCommandLine(interfaces::Node*, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, bool, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >*, WalletModel const*)
    27#: (0x55A0C6F38475) rpcconsole.cpp:444      - RPCExecutor::request(QString const&, WalletModel const*)
    28#: (0x55A0C8064490) <unknown-file>          - ???
    29#: (0x55A0C82E95B2) <unknown-file>          - ???
  Aborted (core dumped)
  ```

  ## What was done?
  Added a guard in UpgradeToHD that wallet is not descriptor wallet.

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Create wallet "Blank" + "Descriptor".
  Call rpc "upgradetohd" -> no crash

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK e708a4b047

Tree-SHA512: 1963606b52e9aed13ba0f4d27f5c2e590351970842333f54c39612d4dc2d47f0ad7ac87cbff2473d2b3544d1f21dded10f9d84c109c2224f4e8070309655b053
2024-07-02 08:38:54 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
684503db6b
feat: add a marker experimental for descriptor wallets 2024-07-02 01:11:15 +07:00
Konstantin Akimov
bebea4b9b6
fix: auto backup issue with descriptor wallets for CJ 2024-07-02 00:23:19 +07:00
pasta
acc42267d4
Merge #6080: feat: bump protocol version to distinguish v21 from v20.1
375838378a feat: bump protocol version to distinguish v21 from v20.1 (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  See commit

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes
  None really; will require MNs to upgrade in order to not be banned

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: c4a61e3c9a1ccda9b00a8982eaaff6ea7672bf59d9538342b0e45a16977554224b44b34db48d3355d28e2b26a01ab3133a5e0c38bb00a3d7a1410cfd1fcfc4ae
2024-07-01 11:45:29 -05:00
pasta
d2bbff3927
Merge #6087: feat: stricter bestCLHeightDiff checks
6c5246803d test: add tests for both current and future behaviour (UdjinM6)
4e86bda4dc feat: stricter bestCLHeightDiff checks (UdjinM6)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Current `bestCLHeightDiff` checks are too relaxed

  ## What was done?
  Make`bestCLHeightDiff` checks stricter

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  Run a node on mainnet/testet, run tests

  ## Breaking Changes
  Old nodes aren't aware of this new logic so it's activated via `mn_rr` hardfork

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK 6c5246803d

Tree-SHA512: 2028d0ceb00a2270c92831ef38488d009d0bac47be4fc6a23ac93efdcf74847f1b9e99a529863fb4e14c65f120adda4e12c5b9e084d0f667d5f0fbaf80e3701d
2024-07-01 11:41:19 -05:00
UdjinM6
6c5246803d
test: add tests for both current and future behaviour 2024-07-01 11:38:26 -05:00