Commit Graph

1635 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
MarcoFalke
df51c199b4 Merge #17819: doc: developer notes guideline on RPCExamples addresses
42ec4994892e67e3430f867af069aafcc2e08593 doc: developer notes guideline on RPCExamples addresses (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  to make explicit the use of invalid addresses for user safety and to encourage
  the use of bech32 addresses by default. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17578#discussion_r361752570 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17578#discussion_r362564492.

  Fix a typo to appease the linter.

ACKs for top commit:
  promag:
    ACK 42ec4994892e67e3430f867af069aafcc2e08593, no strong opinion as whether this belongs to developer notes or not but why not.
  fjahr:
    ACK 42ec499
  michaelfolkson:
    ACK 42ec4994892e67e3430f867af069aafcc2e08593

Tree-SHA512: 64f90e227d256aa194c4fd48435440bdc233a51213dd4a6ac5b05d04263f729c6b4bb5f3afd3b87719b20cb1b159d5a9673d58a11b72823a4a6a16e8a26ae10e
2023-05-31 18:14:23 -05:00
MarcoFalke
fc930dc0f4 Merge #18278: interfaces: Describe and follow some code conventions
3dc27a15242a22b5301904375e5880372e9b7f4d doc: Add internal interface conventions to developer notes (Russell Yanofsky)
1dca9dc4c772fa0a4ec52c4d88b7cd3d243aea7b refactor: Change createWallet, fillPSBT argument order (Russell Yanofsky)
96dfe5ced64979e51649d20555aa182defc80119 refactor: Change Chain::broadcastTransaction param order (Russell Yanofsky)
6ceb21909ce66b7b4762a855889acd46bb6b77f3 refactor: Rename Chain::Notifications methods to be consistent with other interfaces methods (Russell Yanofsky)
1c2ab1a6d29f2c6c065dae4f4a4e2ad1286311b3 refactor: Rename Node::disconnect methods (Russell Yanofsky)
77e4b0657298c715c835d8d2eb11e173852e6815 refactor: Get rid of Wallet::IsWalletFlagSet method (Russell Yanofsky)

Pull request description:

  This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).

  This PR doesn't change behavior at all, it just cleans up code in [`src/interfaces`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/src/interfaces) to simplify #10102, and [documents](https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/blob/pr/ipc-conv/doc/developer-notes.md#internal-interface-guidelines) coding conventions there better

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    re-ACK 3dc27a15242a22b5301904375e5880372e9b7f4d, the only change since the [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18278#pullrequestreview-372582146) review is rebasing.
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK 3dc27a15242a22b5301904375e5880372e9b7f4d 🕍

Tree-SHA512: 62e6a0f2488e3924e559d2074ed460b92e7a0a5d98eab492221cb20d59d04bbe32aef2a8aeba5e4ea9168cfa91acd5bc973dce6677be0180bd7a919354df53ed
2023-05-31 12:01:04 -05:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
0c1f8cc09a merge bitcoin#19408: Windows WSL build recommendation to temporarily disable Win32 PE support 2023-05-27 23:15:24 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
44d9a2e8d2 merge bitcoin#21324: Update build instructions for Fedora 2023-05-27 23:15:24 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
057b1ea9ed merge bitcoin#14264: Split depends installation instructions per arch 2023-05-27 23:15:24 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
3915da1be5 merge bitcoin#13460: Remove note to install all boost dev packages 2023-05-27 23:15:15 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
a20c39cf1c merge bitcoin#15518: Remove ppa from linux build instructions 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
ce7dc59852 merge bitcoin#20601: Update for FreeBSD 12.2, add GUI Build Instructions 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
67db40e63f merge bitcoin#18340: mention MAKE=gmake workaround when building on a BSD 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
60084960ec merge bitcoin#11984: Update OpenBSD build instructions for 6.2 (cont'd) 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
7144e6b8fc merge bitcoin#15416: update FreeBSD build guide for 12.0 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
24056ec704 merge bitcoin#14617: Document Python 3 requirement for 'gmake check' 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
4124c168f8 merge bitcoin#13476: Fix incorrect shell quoting in FreeBSD build instructions 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
2ba8270308 merge bitcoin#13372: split FreeBSD build instructions out of build-unix.md 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
be4915434f merge bitcoin#12581: Mention configure without wallet in FreeBSD instructions 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
47fe7335c0 merge bitcoin#11945: Improve BSD compatibility of contrib/install_db4.sh 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
d502011355 merge bitcoin#12306: Improvements to UNIX documentation 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
cb5ac0d292 merge bitcoin#11702: Add a script for installing db4 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
014488041a merge bitcoin#11442: Update OpenBSD Build Instructions for OpenBSD 6.2 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
bdb4df24fe merge bitcoin#11080: Update build-openbsd for 6.1 2023-05-27 23:15:05 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
eed3ef3bf4 revert: revert dash#2323 (Update build documentation)
This reverts commit d7e5f02eac.
2023-05-27 23:15:04 +05:30
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
e0810ebd3b revert: revert dash#2328 (Remove obsolete build-openbsd.md)
This reverts commit 407baccec4.
2023-05-27 22:41:55 +05:30
PastaPastaPasta
141e5ef348
docs: add macOS binary notarization docs (#5390)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Missing docs

## What was done?
Added docs

## How Has This Been Tested?
In release of v19.1

## Breaking Changes
None

## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-05-26 13:41:48 -05:00
fanquake
4a9f92059f Merge #17873: doc: Add to Doxygen documentation guidelines
c902c4c0c6a26de8cb69a469503bf4a0bd73903c doc: Add to Doxygen documentation guidelines (Jon Layton)

Pull request description:

  Completes the up-for-grabs PR #16948.

  Changes can be tested here: [doc/developer-notes.md](https://github.com/jonatack/bitcoin/blob/doxygen-developer-notes-improvements/doc/developer-notes.md)

  Co-authored-by: Jon Layton <me@jonl.io>

ACKs for top commit:
  fanquake:
    ACK c902c4c0c6a26de8cb69a469503bf4a0bd73903c - quick read, checked the new links work.
  laanwj:
    ACK c902c4c0c6a26de8cb69a469503bf4a0bd73903c

Tree-SHA512: 3b4cebba23061ad5243b2288c2006bf8527e74c689223825f96a44014875d15b2ab6ff54b8aa342ca657a14cf6ce3ab7d6e25bea5befd91162bc2645a74ddb7e
2023-05-24 12:43:57 -05:00
UdjinM6
6e75f5b2a5
docs: actually add release-notes-19.0.0.md (#5389)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
we missed it in https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5385

## What was done?

## How Has This Been Tested?

## Breaking Changes
n/a

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
2023-05-24 11:39:17 -05:00
UdjinM6
1bfc403165
Merge branch 'master' into merge_master_19.1.0 2023-05-23 13:49:16 +03:00
pasta
a6e2fef076
docs: add release-notes.md for v19.1.0 2023-05-22 09:06:55 -05:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
a287a51b39 ci: update documentation to use focal instead of bionic 2023-05-11 09:18:48 -05:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
0b9500f3e9 partial bitcoin#27483: Bump python minimum version to 3.8 2023-05-11 09:18:48 -05:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
7bd22afacb partial bitcoin#26226: Bump minimum python version to 3.7 2023-05-11 09:18:48 -05:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
1bfb3328e6 merge bitcoin#19504: Bump minimum python version to 3.6 2023-05-11 09:18:48 -05:00
MarcoFalke
6ad9bdf722 Merge #16060: Bury bip9 deployments
e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery)
8319e738f9f118025b332e4fa804d4c31e4113f4 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne)
0328dcdcfcb56dc8918697716d7686be048ad0b3 [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery)
1c93b9b31c2ab7358f9d55f52dd46340397c906d [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery)
3862e473f0cb71a762c0306b171b591341d58142 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66.

  CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt.

  This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360.

ACKs for top commit:
  ajtowns:
    ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work
  ariard:
    ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected.
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK e78aaf41f43d0e2ad78fa6d8dad61032c8ef73d0 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now)

Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
2023-04-25 23:41:20 -05:00
fanquake
3e0160b85e Merge #19058: doc: Drop protobuf stuff
ea9fcfd1305f92a7c3ca4d3c05951ceba1b6b05b doc: Drop protobuf stuff (Hennadii Stepanov)

Pull request description:

  This is a follow-up to #17165.

ACKs for top commit:
  fanquake:
    ACK ea9fcfd1305f92a7c3ca4d3c05951ceba1b6b05b -  clicked the links and they seem to work.

Tree-SHA512: 0861bbac3a3ff781a413e15f5ed02c624bc15d572a001a53cd2fb9f7683456175f69e9d666b72f260abbb5114b67cefca9fada4d179c62384c90479534ae63d5
2023-04-25 23:41:20 -05:00
Samuel Dobson
4fcd7850b0 Merge #17578: rpc: simplify getaddressinfo labels, deprecate previous behavior
8925df86c4df16b1070343fef8e4d238f3cc3bd1 doc: update release notes (Jon Atack)
8bb405bbadf11391ccba7b334b4cfe66dc85b390 test: getaddressinfo labels purpose deprecation test (Jon Atack)
60aba1f2f11529add115d963d05599130288ae28 rpc: simplify getaddressinfo labels, deprecate previous behavior (Jon Atack)
7851f14ccf2bcd1e9b2ad48e5e08881be06d9d21 rpc: incorporate review feedback from PR 17283 (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  This PR builds on #17283 (now merged) and is followed by #17585.

  It modifies the value returned by rpc getaddressinfo `labels` to an array of label name strings and deprecates the previous behavior of returning an array of JSON hash structures containing label `name` and address `purpose` key/value pairs.

  before
  ```
    "labels": [
      {
        "name": "DOUBLE SPEND",
        "purpose": "receive"
      }
  ```
  after
  ```
    "labels": [
      "DOUBLE SPEND"
    ]
  ```

  The deprecated behavior can be re-enabled by starting bitcoind with `-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose`.

  For context, see:
  - https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17283#issuecomment-554458001
  - http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-12-13.html#l-425 (lines 425-427)
  - http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-11-22.html#l-622

  Reviewers: This PR may be tested manually by building, then running bitcoind with and without the `-deprecatedrpc=labelspurpose` flag while verifying the rpc getaddressinfo help text and `labels` output.

  Next steps: deprecate the rpc getaddressinfo `label` field (EDIT: done in #17585) and add support for multiple labels per address. This PR will unblock those.

ACKs for top commit:
  jnewbery:
    reACK 8925df8
  promag:
    Code review ACK 8925df86c4df16b1070343fef8e4d238f3cc3bd1.
  meshcollider:
    Code review ACK 8925df86c4df16b1070343fef8e4d238f3cc3bd1

Tree-SHA512: c2b717209996da32b6484de7bb8800e7048410f9ce6afdb3e02a6866bd4a8f2c730f905fca27b10b877b91cf407f546e69e8c4feb9cd934325a6c71c166bd438
2023-04-25 23:14:25 +03:00
Odysseas Gabrielides
6499917a83
feat(rpc): protx listdiff rpc (#5338)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

## What was done?
Feature requested by @QuantumExplorer and @iammadab.
This PR introduces `protx listdiff`: a more rich alternative of `protx
diff` RPC.

Currently, `protx diff` is returning data only required from SPV for SML
Coinbase MerkleMNListRoot calculation.

Platform team needed a similar RPC returning all the MNs data in order
to calculate the identities.


## How Has This Been Tested?

## Breaking Changes

## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
2023-04-19 09:47:49 -05:00
fanquake
c89b5c8ff7 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#24345: doc: Release process: fix broken link to Guix building docs
64645fa3e045ec30a57dbd416fcf66d4755f37c6 Release process: fix broken link to Guix building docs (Jeremy Rand)

Pull request description:

  Not 100% sure whether this link was always broken or if the Guix docs renamed the heading at some point.  Either way, seems good to fix it.

ACKs for top commit:
  fanquake:
    ACK 64645fa3e045ec30a57dbd416fcf66d4755f37c6

Tree-SHA512: 4932059fe583c0d27c70febf8f4dd8cffd3e15567359c5429d2691e221afc6da319bf43ebcd264ae0f98302e1eeb67ffd763d3d7d06ab1633913555ee7461643
2023-04-18 23:24:06 +03:00
MarcoFalke
1dc0cc00e4 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22573: fuzz: document faster throughput configuration
8a4f0fcd3fc1a35c1482975114555b0fed75a1c0 Document faster throughput configuration (Alex Groce)

Pull request description:

  This is a small change to the fuzzing doc that I think might help more people improve the corpus coverage, which I think is low partly just due to lack of long, low-overhead, runs, in addition to the need to apply a more diverse set of fuzzers and coverage notions.

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK 8a4f0fcd3fc1a35c1482975114555b0fed75a1c0
  tryphe:
    ACK 8a4f0fcd3fc1a35c1482975114555b0fed75a1c0

Tree-SHA512: 0f1802f5c551d6ade7393cd2ac439ffd485786b17c4fd0f1a321f69f8ed0db1167ae04b5cae7bf904e89aba03e89b6d974bff564bfc6a78a571893719f323434
2023-04-18 23:24:06 +03:00
MarcoFalke
bdf36f952b Merge #17437: rpc: Expose block height of wallet transactions
a5e77959c8ff6a8bffa1621d7ea29ee8603c5a14 rpc: Expose block height of wallet transactions (João Barbosa)

Pull request description:

  Closes #17296.

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK a5e77959c8ff6a8bffa1621d7ea29ee8603c5a14 -- diff looks correct now (good catch @theStack!)
  theStack:
    ACK a5e77959c8ff6a8bffa1621d7ea29ee8603c5a14
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK a5e77959c8ff6a8bffa1621d7ea29ee8603c5a14. Changes since last review getblockhash python test fixes, and removing the last hardcoded height

Tree-SHA512: 57dcd0e4e7083f34016bf9cf8ef578fbfde49e882b6cd8623dd1c64716e096e62f6177a4c2ed94f5de304e751fe23fb9d11cf107a86fbf0a3c5f539cd2844916
2023-04-17 19:34:02 +03:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
091d813e00 Merge #17004: validation: Remove REJECT code from CValidationState
9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery)
04a2f326ec0f06fb4fce1c4f93500752f05dede8 [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery)
e9d5a59e34ff2d538d8f5315efd9908bf24d0fdc [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery)
0053e16714323c1694c834fdca74f064a1a33529 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery)
a1a07cfe99fc8cee30ba5976dc36b47b1f6532ab [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery)

Pull request description:

  We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set
  a REJECT code in the CValidationState object.

  Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the
  call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only
  previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`,
  then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it
  wasn't previously:

  - when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`.
  - when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`.

  Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The
  only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in
  ATMP.

  This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579.

ACKs for top commit:
  ariard:
    ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits
  fjahr:
    ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments.
  ryanofsky:
    Code review ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments

Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
2023-04-17 10:42:25 -05:00
MarcoFalke
5d8f250270 Merge #16524: Wallet: Disable -fallbackfee by default
ea4cc3a7b36a9c77dbf0aff439da3ef0ea58e6e4 Truly decouple wallet from chainparams for -fallbackfee (Jorge Timón)

Pull request description:

  Before it was 0 by default for main and 20000 for test and regtest.
  Now it is 0 by default for all chains, thus there's no need to call Params().

  Also now the default for main is properly documented.

  Suggestion for release notes:

  -fallbackfee was 0 (disabled) by default for the main chain, but 20000 by default for the test chains. Now it is 0 by default for all chains. Testnet and regtest users will have to add fallbackfee=20000 to their configuration if they weren't setting it and they want it to keep working like before.

  Should I propose them to the wiki for the release notes or only after merge?

  For more context, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16402#issuecomment-515701042

ACKs for top commit:
  MarcoFalke:
    ACK ea4cc3a7b36a9c77dbf0aff439da3ef0ea58e6e4

Tree-SHA512: fdfaba5d813da4221e405e0988bef44f3856d10f897a94f9614386d14b7716f4326ab8a6646e26d41ef3f4fa61b936191e216b1b605e9ab0520b0657fc162e6c

----

Co-Authored-By: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-04-17 10:42:25 -05:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
55621afe59 merge bitcoin#19354: add release note for -getinfo displaying multiwallet balances 2023-04-17 08:38:46 +00:00
Kittywhiskers Van Gogh
c89cac5783 merge bitcoin#19991: Use alternative port for incoming Tor connections 2023-04-17 08:30:49 +00:00
MarcoFalke
ec1007efce Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22056: doc: describe in fuzzing.md how to reproduce a CI crash
d8f1ea7227260e51c340271fc9a43866799b8ac4 doc: describe in fuzzing.md how to reproduce a CI crash (Jon Atack)

Pull request description:

  Not sure if this is 100% accurate or missing any pertinent info, but I misremembered how to do this today and it seems like useful information to provide.

ACKs for top commit:
  practicalswift:
    ACK d8f1ea7227260e51c340271fc9a43866799b8ac4

Tree-SHA512: 1b74e4187e6ea13b04eb03b3c6e2615c4eb18cc38cce215ad1645f8b135c5c31a243748eb313ccec05f1f62187ba33d550119acf07088968d2d2c1c09bc4c653
2023-04-16 23:40:59 +03:00
fanquake
8f70c136bc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22654: guix: Don't include directory name in SHA256SUMS
132cae44f2d031bdaa1e459b92ec89ad585dfc9f doc: Mention the flat directory structure for uploads (Andrew Chow)
fb17c99e35e72f3b21ec3b5473e84c21dc964776 guix: Don't include directory name in SHA256SUMS (Andrew Chow)

Pull request description:

  The SHA256SUMS file can be used in a sha256sum -c command to verify downloaded binaries. However users are likely to download just a single file and not place this file in the correct directory relative to the SHA256SUMS file for the simple verification command to work. By not including the directory name in the SHA256SUMS file, it will be easier for users to verify downloaded binaries.

ACKs for top commit:
  Zero-1729:
    re-ACK 132cae44f2d031bdaa1e459b92ec89ad585dfc9f
  fanquake:
    ACK 132cae44f2d031bdaa1e459b92ec89ad585dfc9f

Tree-SHA512: c9ff416b8dfb2f3ceaf4d63afb84aac9fcaefbbf9092f9e095061b472884ec92c7a809e6530c7132a82cfe3ab115a7328e47994a412072e1d4feb26fc502c8c5
2023-04-15 12:13:27 -05:00
fanquake
2f09a04d44 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22642: release: Release with separate SHA256SUMS and sig files
90b3e482e911fde73133a157c3b354471682275a release: Release with separate SHA256SUMS and sig files (Carl Dong)

Pull request description:

  This allows us to:
  - remove the rfc4880 EOL hacks, and
  - release with a SHA256SUMS.asc file that's a combination of all signer signatures

ACKs for top commit:
  achow101:
    ACK 90b3e482e911fde73133a157c3b354471682275a
  laanwj:
    Concept and code review ACK 90b3e482e911fde73133a157c3b354471682275a

Tree-SHA512: 5d5086063d303aa0cbd590e5fdf2ae8f555e25f4e43bf67545e33384449b990e94834c711622530ad0eb3dcc83f52746884a5081dadb0acff8dd799cfadafac7
2023-04-15 12:13:27 -05:00
fanquake
f54ec9cde7 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21711: guix: Add full installation and usage documentation
fac4814106c796b8786dd90053513cc35142dfe5 doc/release-process: Add torrent creation details (Carl Dong)
5d24cc3d82dad6812f8370c3ccc7c2b5a6c12c11 guix/INSTALL: Guix installs init scripts in libdir (Carl Dong)
5da2ee49d5b44de803b671aedbdd14e5c1d71ea9 guix/INSTALL: Add coreutils/inotify-dir-recreate troubleshooting (Carl Dong)
318c60700b7bbb7ec09a29bf037e7c2787646be6 guix: Adapt release-process.md to new Guix process (Carl Dong)
fcab35b2292f9221eaba521740e8b3b2511a8b78 guix-attest: Produce and sign normalized documents (Carl Dong)
c2541fd0ca99481a5a792a8f2772925d64fb0491 guix: Overhaul README (Carl Dong)
46ce6ce3782dfbd8f9d26dc2ba0f284755e75f2d tree-wide: Rename gitian-keys to builder-keys (Carl Dong)
fc4f8449f34e32b0b9ac9d218d6c3264b02467ba guix: Update various check_tools lists (Carl Dong)
263220a85c1df218431fafbda07c8b23ccc4ce4d guix: Check for a sane services database (Carl Dong)

Pull request description:

  Based on: #21462

  Keeping the README in one file so that it's easy to search through. Will add more jumping links later so navigation is easier.

  Current TODOs:
  - [x] Shell installer option: prompt user to re-login for `/etc/profile.d` entry to be picked up
  - [x] Binary tarball option: prompt user to create `/etc/profile.d` entry and re-login
  - [x] Fanquake docker option: complete section
  - [x] Arch Linux AUR option: prompt to start `guix-daemon-latest` unit after finishing "optional setup" section
  - [x] Building from source option: Insert dependency tree diagram that I made
  - [x] Building from source option: redo sectioning, kind of a mess right now
  - [x] Optional setup: make clear which parts are only needed if building from source
  - [x] Workaround 1 for GnuTLS: perhaps mention how to remove Guix build farm's key
  - [x] Overall (after everything): Make the links work.

  Note to self: wherever possible, tell user how to check that something is true rather than branching by installation option.

ACKs for top commit:
  fanquake:
    ACK fac4814106c796b8786dd90053513cc35142dfe5 - going to go ahead and merge this now. It's a lot of documentation, and could probably be nit-picked / improved further, however, that can continue over the next few weeks. I'm sure more (backportable) improvements / clarifications will be made while we progress through RCs towards a new release.

Tree-SHA512: dc46c0ecdfc67c7c7743ca26e4a603eb3f54adbf81be2f4c1f4c20577ebb84b5250b9c9ec89c0e9860337ab1c7cff94d7963c603287267deecfe1cd987fa070a
2023-04-15 12:13:27 -05:00
pasta
36dc69ab17
Merge branch 'master' into develop 2023-04-14 15:25:51 -05:00
PastaPastaPasta
4266edf784
doc: update the content of release notes for v19.0.0 and archive old release notes
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-04-11 12:41:13 -05:00
Konstantin Akimov
dd49bc313b
chore: run gen-manpages.sh for 19.0.0 (#5305)
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5294

## What was done?
Called `contrib/devtools/gen-manpages.sh` on top of new assume valid
values, see dash#5304


## How Has This Been Tested?
Reviewed only

## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes


## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2023-04-09 21:48:23 -05:00
Wladimir J. van der Laan
401b55e5c4 Merge #18466: rpc: fix invalid parameter error codes for {sign,verify}message RPCs
a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f doc: release note for changed {sign,verify}message error codes (Sebastian Falbesoner)
9e399b9b2d386b28c0c0ff59fc75d31dbec31d9c test: check parameter validity in rpc_signmessage.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
e62f0c71f10def124b1c1219d790cef246a32c3e rpc: fix {sign,message}verify RPC errors for invalid address/signature (Sebastian Falbesoner)

Pull request description:

  RPCs that accept address parameters usually return the intended error code `RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY` (-5) if a passed address is invalid. The two exceptions to the rule are `signmessage` and `verifymessage`, which return `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` (-3) in this case instead. Oddly enough `verifymessage` returns `RPC_INVALID_ADDRESS_OR_KEY` when the _signature_ was malformed, where `RPC_TYPE_ERROR` would be more approriate.

  This PR fixes these inaccuracies and as well adds tests to `rpc_signmessage.py` that check the parameter validity and error codes for the related RPCs `signmessagewithprivkey`, `signmessage` and `verifymessage`.

  master branch:
  ```
  $ ./bitcoin-cli signmessage invalid_addr message
  error code: -3
  error message:
  Invalid address
  $ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage invalid_addr dummy_sig message
  error code: -3
  error message:
  Invalid address
  $ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage 12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX invalid_sig message
  error code: -5
  error message:
  Malformed base64 encoding
  ```
  PR branch:
  ```
  $ ./bitcoin-cli signmessage invalid_addr message
  error code: -5
  error message:
  Invalid address
  $ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage invalid_addr dummy_sig message
  error code: -5
  error message:
  Invalid address
  $ ./bitcoin-cli verifymessage 12c6DSiU4Rq3P4ZxziKxzrL5LmMBrzjrJX invalid_sig message
  error code: -3
  error message:
  Malformed base64 encoding
  ```

ACKs for top commit:
  laanwj:
    Code review ACK a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f
  meshcollider:
    utACK a5cfb40e27bd281354bd0d14d91f83efb6bfce9f

Tree-SHA512: bae0c4595a2603cea66090f6033785601837b45fd853052312b3a39d8520566c581994b68f693dd247c22586c638c3b7689c849085cce548cc36b9bf0e119d2d
2023-04-09 00:06:56 -05:00