42ec4994892e67e3430f867af069aafcc2e08593 doc: developer notes guideline on RPCExamples addresses (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
to make explicit the use of invalid addresses for user safety and to encourage
the use of bech32 addresses by default. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17578#discussion_r361752570 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17578#discussion_r362564492.
Fix a typo to appease the linter.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 42ec4994892e67e3430f867af069aafcc2e08593, no strong opinion as whether this belongs to developer notes or not but why not.
fjahr:
ACK 42ec499
michaelfolkson:
ACK 42ec4994892e67e3430f867af069aafcc2e08593
Tree-SHA512: 64f90e227d256aa194c4fd48435440bdc233a51213dd4a6ac5b05d04263f729c6b4bb5f3afd3b87719b20cb1b159d5a9673d58a11b72823a4a6a16e8a26ae10e
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix a couple of issues in helpers, extend feature_dip3_v19.py to check
more after v19 fork
## What was done?
pls see individual PRs
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Currently, Chainlocks are either enabled or disabled. This PR adds a
third state: enabled but we will not sign new ones.
Should probably backport this to v19.x
## What was done?
Spork state != 0 but active will now result in chain locks being
enforced but not created.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
0ed2d8e07d3806d78d03a77d2153f22f9d733a07 test: add BIP37 remote crash bug [CVE-2013-5700] test to p2p_filter.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Integrates the missing message type `filteradd` to the test framework and checks that the BIP37 implementation is not vulnerable to the "remote crash bug" [CVE-2013-5700](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-5700) anymore. Prior to v.0.8.4, it was possible to trigger a division-by-zero error on the following line in the function `CBloomFilter::Hash()`:
f0d6487e29/src/bloom.cpp (L45)
By setting a zero-length filter via `filterload`, `vData.size()` is 0, so the modulo operation above, called on any .insert() or .contains() operation then crashed the node. The test uses the approach of just sending an arbitrary `filteradd` message after, which calls `CBloomFilter::insert()` (and in turn `CBloomFilter::Hash()`) on the node. The vulnerability was fixed by commit 37c6389c5a (an intentional covert fix, [according to gmaxwell](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18483#issuecomment-608224095)), which introduced flags `isEmpty`/`isFull` that wouldn't call the `Hash()` member function if `isFull` is true (set to true by default constructor).
To validate that the test fails if the implementation is vulnerable, one can simply set the flags to false in the member function `UpdateEmptyFull()` (that is called after a filter received via `filterload` is constructed), which activates the vulnerable code path calling `Hash` in any case on adding or testing for data in the filter:
```diff
diff --git a/src/bloom.cpp b/src/bloom.cpp
index bd6069b..ef294a3 100644
--- a/src/bloom.cpp
+++ b/src/bloom.cpp
@@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ void CBloomFilter::UpdateEmptyFull()
full &= vData[i] == 0xff;
empty &= vData[i] == 0;
}
- isFull = full;
- isEmpty = empty;
+ isFull = false;
+ isEmpty = false;
}
```
Resulting in:
```
$ ./p2p_filter.py
[...]
2020-04-03T14:38:59.593000Z TestFramework (INFO): Check that division-by-zero remote crash bug [CVE-2013-5700] is fixed
2020-04-03T14:38:59.695000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
[...]
[... some exceptions following ...]
```
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 0ed2d8e07d3806d78d03a77d2153f22f9d733a07
Tree-SHA512: 02d0253d13eab70c4bd007b0750c56a5a92d05d419d53033523eeb3ed80318bc95196ab90f7745ea3ac9ebae7caee3adbf2a055a40a4124e0915226e49018fe8
4670006762ffce654bb12edb5a7e64ad004122a7 test: remove redundant sync_with_ping after add_p2p_connection (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Now that #18247 is merged, these calls are redundant.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
utACK 4670006
Tree-SHA512: bdbfe8bcf9dbdde0a8115e3a62bfe359910798d7a3010d920ffca07049cb5f97bf8fb9b6f70079b0607105192b61a6d665774e59a2b678597b47ad6237595ad5
6112a209828c43930f677c45461339cdf68a56e9 test: replace (send_message + sync_with_ping) with send_and_ping (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to faf1d047313e71658fb31f6b94fdd5d37705ab85 yesterday.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
utACK 6112a20
MarcoFalke:
ACK 6112a209828c43930f677c45461339cdf68a56e9 🎞
Tree-SHA512: 749644ac9a1ef0e1aa6c3ac5e899eb3fa7fb9c0909352f922a80412df2bc0e539692a7757af550eff4d4914cbe57b0c75ce3948f569acc7a52852e91a55ad457
00559229588feb19de2a0cb7506f70c483a1f433 test: add BIP37 'filterclear' test to p2p_filter.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Integrates the message type `filterclear` to the test framework and adds a simple test to `p2p_filter.py`, checking that arbitrary txs get relayed again after deleting the filter.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK 00559229588feb19de2a0cb7506f70c483a1f433
Tree-SHA512: fe64e99a526865770707d8077b9968d3923f248045ec7fa56cd380dba85ac77a71a473d244ef3aede2fc0d287b8d7c6bc0156b6033b0c949c2058cc08e255697
83e1d92413e262e6a876336ec433a6fbc335223a test: listsinceblock block height checks (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is the second commit of #17535.
This PR extends a listsinceblock test to check the new transaction 'blockheight' field recently added in #17437. It also cleans up code in the test function without changing or removing existing checks.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tested ACK 83e1d92413e262e6a876336ec433a6fbc335223a
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 83e1d92413e262e6a876336ec433a6fbc335223a. Nice test improvements!
Tree-SHA512: 92874b49a3bc0236500495f32dfcf683e1971ca3d4c51702c69ed4ce7dfce21273754f02f93d1243d73793701d9fdf49e14b149477cd249cbbd9e4e8d5bd49f8
fad2f68353944c83cad7b77415645215ae3f1093 init: Replace URL_WEBSITE with PACKAGE_URL (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is needed for rebranding efforts such as #18489
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fad2f68353944c83cad7b77415645215ae3f1093, tested on Linux Mint 19.3:
fanquake:
ACK fad2f68353944c83cad7b77415645215ae3f1093 - clicked a link.
Tree-SHA512: c26e18cd328d3dd3fd7e25413e1bab780026687a148f126b8673e5f6cc13249f6c16689e45eba9da1545915c6001f96cd33f4e656c08cda3eae1c3fd88da23ea
dcda81c47101196e53e379d965a2692515ef8363 test: add coverage for script parse error in ParseScript (pierrenn)
Pull request description:
Follow up on this suggestion : https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18416#issuecomment-603966799
This adds a test case to raise the `script parse error` in `ParseScript`.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK dcda81c471
Tree-SHA512: ae0ef2c00f34cee818c83582f190d5f4043159e922862f2b442b7b895b8ff3ca421533699247c12c367be77813b5205830a771cd47a18e8932807ccace2d6a1c
faf7d4fa86b700ec272806cd2bd8666a92405619 build: Add cov_fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
fac71e364e4bbaeffc35e45aff8c8c2c6f2b5c67 build: link fuzz/test_runner.py for out-of-tree builds (MarcoFalke)
faf2c5aca01643eb560287e08f9c0a7ca0ac9c88 build: Remove unused USE_COVERAGE (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Only libFuzzer is supported right now, so clang is required. Thus, this needs a workaround such as https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12602#issuecomment-562788247
Can be tested with:
```
mkdir build && cd build
../configure --enable-fuzz --with-sanitizers=fuzzer --enable-lcov --enable-lcov-branch-coverage CC=clang CXX=clang++
make $MAKEJOBS
make cov_fuzz
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK faf7d4fa86b700ec272806cd2bd8666a92405619
Tree-SHA512: 6828f8f81d95f6781713d0b09d7eba2ffdb50217e09ca839db61791a4ed70024859c7a0cb01d9eede79166d574dd57ece01f9d9fe2610d4a72a4ca4a4ce0b838
cd04286825c6512b46bf59ab7b3dfffb0e36d65b build: Fix typo in EVENT_CFLAGS variable (Hennadii Stepanov)
f709ad0c907d87d03002455967cc30ae7d704d80 build: Fix libevent linking for bench_bitcoin binary (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This change fixes `libevent` linking error for the `bench_bitcoin` binary.
This PR is an alternative to #18377.
Fix#18373.
Also fixed a typo in `EVENT_CFLAGS` variable noted by **brakmic**.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK cd04286825c6512b46bf59ab7b3dfffb0e36d65b
Tree-SHA512: a62f7457e86b11d3a55d603ea5d83f3a413792e2f28a0c72300e54d12591bd6f0acc1d76a4bd4b591e0223bc6d530e7a4b9a8b939fe2fdbf2dddfda5b1b537be
76db4b260e4826a1e59a5e44c92e4c10ec986527 gui: avoid QT Designer/Form Editor re-formatting (Jon Atack)
aae26053f958ae9a96a25d32c6341b14daaa4f26 gui: display Mapped AS in peers info window (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Continuing the asmap integration of #16702 which added `mapped_as` to the rpc getpeerinfo output, this adds the mapped AS to the Peers detail window in the GUI wallet.
`$ src/qt/bitcoin-qt -asmap=<path-to-asmap-file>` (asmap on)
`$ src/qt/bitcoin-qt` (asmap off)
Added a tooltip and a couple of minor fixups.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 76db4b260e4826a1e59a5e44c92e4c10ec986527
Tree-SHA512: 5f44c05c247bfabc9c161884d3af47c50a571cd02777b320ce389e61efa47706adbf0ea5e6644ae40423cb579d8bd0bb3c84fc6b618293a7add8e4327f07f63f
5aab011805ceb12801644170700b1a62e0bf4a5d test: add unit test for non-standard "scriptsig-not-pushonly" txs (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
Approaches another missing unit test of issue #17394: Checks that the function `IsStandardTx()` returns rejection reason "scriptsig-not-pushonly" if any one of the input's scriptSig consists of any other ops than just PUSHs.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 5aab011805ceb12801644170700b1a62e0bf4a5d 🍟
practicalswift:
ACK 5aab011805ceb12801644170700b1a62e0bf4a5d -- patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: fbe25bcf57e5f0c8d2397eb67e61fe8d9145ba83032789adb2b67d6fcbcd87e6427e9d965e8cd7bbaaea482e39ec2f110f71ef2de079c7d1fba2712848caa9ba
3dc27a15242a22b5301904375e5880372e9b7f4d doc: Add internal interface conventions to developer notes (Russell Yanofsky)
1dca9dc4c772fa0a4ec52c4d88b7cd3d243aea7b refactor: Change createWallet, fillPSBT argument order (Russell Yanofsky)
96dfe5ced64979e51649d20555aa182defc80119 refactor: Change Chain::broadcastTransaction param order (Russell Yanofsky)
6ceb21909ce66b7b4762a855889acd46bb6b77f3 refactor: Rename Chain::Notifications methods to be consistent with other interfaces methods (Russell Yanofsky)
1c2ab1a6d29f2c6c065dae4f4a4e2ad1286311b3 refactor: Rename Node::disconnect methods (Russell Yanofsky)
77e4b0657298c715c835d8d2eb11e173852e6815 refactor: Get rid of Wallet::IsWalletFlagSet method (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).
This PR doesn't change behavior at all, it just cleans up code in [`src/interfaces`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/src/interfaces) to simplify #10102, and [documents](https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/blob/pr/ipc-conv/doc/developer-notes.md#internal-interface-guidelines) coding conventions there better
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 3dc27a15242a22b5301904375e5880372e9b7f4d, the only change since the [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18278#pullrequestreview-372582146) review is rebasing.
MarcoFalke:
ACK 3dc27a15242a22b5301904375e5880372e9b7f4d 🕍
Tree-SHA512: 62e6a0f2488e3924e559d2074ed460b92e7a0a5d98eab492221cb20d59d04bbe32aef2a8aeba5e4ea9168cfa91acd5bc973dce6677be0180bd7a919354df53ed
2a1b85f3c54fdaa8d13aeaf7e1acab1afb98fd97 tx: Bump transifex slug to 020x (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
82dd8860bbe81567e4afb033d9026dc0e69b1574 qt: Periodical translations update (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Need to merge this so that translations for 0.20 can start.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: c78307eea3130b9bbc301f23790340e4c86a3f3877ab308bf67d9e1c9e977f7dda4b2cd83b96d9398b01dce616a6c962b98115123628bba35170eb0f301c4dd8
e6e622e5a0e22c2ac1b50b96af818e412d67ac54 Implement O(1) OP_IF/NOTIF/ELSE/ENDIF logic (Pieter Wuille)
d0e8f4d5d8ddaccb37f98b7989fb944081e41ab8 [refactor] interpreter: define interface for vfExec (Anthony Towns)
89fb241c54fc85befacfa3703d8e21bf3b8a76eb Benchmark script verification with 100 nested IFs (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
While investigating what mechanisms are possible to maximize the per-opcode verification cost of scripts, I noticed that the logic for determining whether a particular opcode is to be executed is O(n) in the nesting depth. This issue was also pointed out by Sergio Demian Lerner in https://bitslog.wordpress.com/2017/04/17/new-quadratic-delays-in-bitcoin-scripts/, and this PR implements a variant of the O(1) algorithm suggested there.
This is not a problem currently, because even with a nesting depth of 100 (the maximum possible right now due to the 201 ops limit), the slowdown caused by this on my machine is around 70 ns per opcode (or 0.25 s per block) at worst, far lower than what is possible with other opcodes.
This PR mostly serves as a proof of concept that it's possible to avoid it, which may be relevant in discussions around increasing the opcode limits in future script versions. Without it, the execution time of scripts can grow quadratically with the nesting depth, which very quickly becomes unreasonable.
This improves upon #14245 by completely removing the `vfExec` vector.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK e6e622e5a0e22c2ac1b50b96af818e412d67ac54
MarcoFalke:
ACK e6e622e5a0e22c2ac1b50b96af818e412d67ac54 🐴
fjahr:
ACK e6e622e5a0e22c2ac1b50b96af818e412d67ac54
ajtowns:
ACK e6e622e5a0e22c2ac1b50b96af818e412d67ac54
laanwj:
concept and code review ACK e6e622e5a0e22c2ac1b50b96af818e412d67ac54
jonatack:
ACK e6e622e5a0e22c2ac1b50b96af818e412d67ac54 code review, build, benches, fuzzing
Tree-SHA512: 1dcfac3411ff04773de461959298a177f951cb5f706caa2734073bcec62224d7cd103767cfeef85cd129813e70c14c74fa8f1e38e4da70ec38a0f615aab1f7f7
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Dash does not have `sethdseed`, but the help mentioned it.
## What was done?
Switched to `upgradetohd`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
TSan builds export all sorts of symbols that aren't part of the
allowlist and report sanitizer failures when enabled with glibc
compatibility enabled.
The result of `check-symbols` is valuable but Bitcoin does not
run them during their CI runs and for certain developer-oriented
builds, it's proving to be more of an obstruction. It will still
be enabled for all other builds and will prove to be important
in backporting Guix pull requests, a finger on the pulse, but that
doesn't apply to dev-oriented builds.
5e7e4c9f6e57f5333bd17a20b0c85a78d032998e refactor: replace RecursiveMutex g_maplocalhost_mutex with Mutex (w0xlt)
a7da1409bc9f614009f76c1bfc55f029ff1265e4 scripted-diff: rename cs_mapLocalHost -> g_maplocalhost_mutex (w0xlt)
Pull request description:
This PR is related to #19303 and gets rid of the `RecursiveMutex cs_mapLocalHost`.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK 5e7e4c9f6e57f5333bd17a20b0c85a78d032998e
theStack:
ACK 5e7e4c9f6e57f5333bd17a20b0c85a78d032998e
hebasto:
ACK 5e7e4c9f6e57f5333bd17a20b0c85a78d032998e, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 961171e346fe385e16db9830115a8096f4ca2499bbea11a08c02ca808638dfb63c434ab9d66392c71e85be6352c8a2b6a0054b5a61aaabd28d71581fed5beae7
5574e6ed52d6effd3b7beff0f09b44449202a585 refactor: replace RecursiveMutex `m_callbacks_mutex` with Mutex (Sebastian Falbesoner)
3aa258109e3f3e0b1bfc4f811cbadfd6d516208c scripted-diff: rename `m_cs_callbacks_pending` -> `m_callbacks_mutex` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is related to #19303 and gets rid of the RecursiveMutex `m_cs_callbacks_pending`. All of the critical sections (6 in total) only directly access the guarded elements, i.e. it is not possible that within one section another one is called, and we can use a regular Mutex:
807169e10b/src/scheduler.cpp (L138-L145)807169e10b/src/scheduler.cpp (L152-L160)807169e10b/src/scheduler.cpp (L169-L172)807169e10b/src/scheduler.cpp (L184-L187)807169e10b/src/scheduler.cpp (L197-L199)807169e10b/src/scheduler.cpp (L203-L206)
Also, it is renamed to adapt to the (unwritten) naming convention to use the `_mutex` suffix rather than the `cs_` prefix.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 5574e6ed52d6effd3b7beff0f09b44449202a585, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
w0xlt:
crACK 5574e6e
Tree-SHA512: ba4b151d956582f4c7183a1d51702b269158fc5e2902c51e6a242aaeb1c72cfcdf398f9ffa42e3072f5aba21a8c493086a5fe7c450c271322da69bd54c37ed1f
fa6a548f5485ad5be0106e4727812559aefc5a20 ci: Disable s390x gui tests for now (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fa6a548f5485ad5be0106e4727812559aefc5a20, tested locally with
Tree-SHA512: 077bcda0b4612dfbf538eb2999ce9f32ec3739c2ed5709f7c4c5d1a39738fbe6e549bd54b237152fd808736c15af1024e67c95dc87b4c3102738543522cb14d7
8c277b19c8f262e550cffe263e6d910b687ac882 refactor: Make m_cs_fee_estimator non-recursive (Hennadii Stepanov)
5ee5b696b588695ff78aaac08d5d85154f1953cf refactor: Add non-thread-safe CBlockPolicyEstimator::_removeTx helper (Hennadii Stepanov)
5c3033d45e5ec15499ce7a0222ffa0210a0f66bc Add thread safety annotations to CBlockPolicyEstimator public functions (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR eliminates the only place that `m_cs_fee_estimator` is recursively locked by refactoring out `_removeTx` member function.
Related to #19303.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK 8c277b19c8f262e550cffe263e6d910b687ac882
amadeuszpawlik:
ACK 8c277b19c8f262e550cffe263e6d910b687ac882 reviewed, built and ran tests
Tree-SHA512: 65b0b59460d3d5fadf7e75e916b2898b0dcfafdf5b278ef8c3975660f67c9f88ae4b937944313bd36d7513a7a53e1e5859aaf4a6deb4a1aea089936b101635a1
cdb41d5573b1e2ed1bc1d8d1dc9f77e82672ee1f doc: Install Rosetta on M1-macOS for qt in depends (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On master (c609e10545492aba480ff17aff7eefc13a0b5cd8) `make -C depends qt` on Apple Silicon based macOS 11.4 ends with an error:
```
/bin/sh: /Users/hebasto/bitcoin/depends/work/build/aarch64-apple-darwin20.5.0/qt/5.12.11-6c4d47a8f8f/qtbase/bin/moc: Bad CPU type in executable
```
Installing Rosetta 2 fixes it.
Explanation. On Apple Silicon macOS the `qt` package in depends actually is cross compiled. All native tools (including `moc`) are x86_64 binaries, that require Rosetta 2 to run.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK cdb41d5573b1e2ed1bc1d8d1dc9f77e82672ee1f.
fanquake:
ACK cdb41d5573b1e2ed1bc1d8d1dc9f77e82672ee1f - I have not tested after installing Rosetta 2, but I saw the same issue during my first cross-compile on an M1 box.
Zero-1729:
ACK cdb41d5573b1e2ed1bc1d8d1dc9f77e82672ee1f
Tree-SHA512: fb06a32d6fb40f405ce856b44f5d3af0c51089886f3be79e509e5c325614d7af58ce4480c064c17e0efb695a1f69f68d533c417f9631d46d8a630aba60ce4433
fad0867d6ab9430070aa7d60bf7617a6508e0586 Cleanup -includeconf error message (MarcoFalke)
fa9f711c3746ca3962f15224285a453744cd45b3 Fix crash when parsing command line with -noincludeconf=0 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The error message has several issues:
* It may crash instead of cleanly shutting down, when `-noincludeconf=0` is passed
* It doesn't quote the value
* It includes an erroneous trailing `\n`
* It is redundantly mentioning `"-includeconf cannot be used from commandline;"` several times, when once should be more than sufficient
Fix all issues by:
* Replacing `get_str()` with `write()` to fix the crash and quoting issue
* Remove the `\n` and only print the first value to fix the other issues
Before:
```
$ ./src/bitcoind -noincludeconf=0
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error'
what(): JSON value is not a string as expected
Aborted (core dumped)
$ ./src/bitcoind -includeconf='a b' -includeconf=c
Error: Error parsing command line arguments: -includeconf cannot be used from commandline; -includeconf=a b
-includeconf cannot be used from commandline; -includeconf=c
```
After:
```
$ ./src/bitcoind -noincludeconf=0
Error: Error parsing command line arguments: -includeconf cannot be used from commandline; -includeconf=true
$ ./src/bitcoind -includeconf='a b' -includeconf=c
Error: Error parsing command line arguments: -includeconf cannot be used from commandline; -includeconf="a b"
```
Hopefully fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34493
Testcase: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/files/6515429/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-system-6328535926046720.log
```
FUZZ=system ./src/test/fuzz/fuzz ./clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-system-6328535926046720.log
```
See https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK fad0867d6ab9430070aa7d60bf7617a6508e0586
Tree-SHA512: b44af93be6bf71b43669058c1449c4c6999f03b5b01b429851b149b12d77733408cb207e9a3edc6f0bffd6030c4c52165e8e23a1c2718ff5082a6ba254cc94a4
9053b88b1c15f57cdcff2fc1c761efebb2ebfefe update docstring in feature_csv_activation.py (Pierre K)
Pull request description:
These changes in the test documentation reflect the changes introduced in #17921.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 9053b88
Tree-SHA512: 17fb954baded8dab1c869dd48b76b516150bae616c792c573e4114d4adfdd40195745c56570aa3050cc0015ee496acd7ec178df8ba14831dd22f9722fda84da2
d1292f25f272401da0c58580521c74b1fa03a9ad Avoid the use of abs64 in timedata (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Fixes#20135.
ACKs for top commit:
kallewoof:
ACK d1292f25f272401da0c58580521c74b1fa03a9ad
jonatack:
ACK d1292f25f272401da0c58580521c74b1fa03a9ad code/logic review, verified there are no remaining callers of `abs64()`, verified no warnings in a debug build
practicalswift:
ACK d1292f25f272401da0c58580521c74b1fa03a9ad
MarcoFalke:
ACK d1292f25f272401da0c58580521c74b1fa03a9ad 🎹
Tree-SHA512: d17e95c668eb5e02ea546433b3d1b5a0ccbfb2c9cec62fa67dad1844d7e278a2576fbc0b75bddbf4db9af7331e978148c7bef7fce7e6a07e0eb917ef1392f302
fa56eda58e5ec2f2345bbe14c798e83f2abb4728 log: Avoid treating remote misbehvior as local system error (MarcoFalke)
fa492895b572a1196ca8652006b6fc2fa1d16951 refactor: Switch ValidationState mode to C++11 enum class (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When logging failures of `CheckBlockHeader` (high-hash), they are always logged as system error. This is problematic for several reasons:
* Submitting a blockheader that fails `CheckBlockHeader` over RPC will result in a debug log line that starts with `ERROR`. Proper behaviour should be to log not anything and instead only return the failure reason to the RPC user. This pull does not fix this issue entirely, but is a good first step in the right direction.
* A misbehaving peer that sends us an invalid block header that fails `CheckBlockHeader` will result in a debug log line that starts with `ERROR`. Proper behavior should be to log the remote peer misbehavior if logging for that category was enabled. This pull fixes this issue for `CheckBlockHeader` and other functions can be adjusted as well if needed in follow-ups. This should be a good first step in the right direction.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
re-ACK fa56eda58e5ec2f2345bbe14c798e83f2abb4728
Tree-SHA512: 9793191f5cb57bdff7c93926e94877e8ca2ef89dcebcf9eb155899c733961839ec7c3f9b9f001dc082ada4234fe6e75f6df431301678d6822325840771166d77
6fdfeebcc79df62c8bf1cf4b6e9e97d6aefb3eb3 refactor: Replace RecursiveMutex with Mutex in rpc/server.cpp (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The functions that could lock this mutex, i.e., `SetRPCWarmupStatus()`, `SetRPCWarmupFinished()`, `RPCIsInWarmup()`, `CRPCTable::execute()`, do not call itself recursively, and do not call each other either directly or indirectly. Therefore, the `g_rpc_warmup_mutex` could be a non-recursive mutex.
Related to #19303.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 6fdfeebcc79df62c8bf1cf4b6e9e97d6aefb3eb3
MarcoFalke:
ACK 6fdfeebcc79df62c8bf1cf4b6e9e97d6aefb3eb3
Tree-SHA512: 05a8ac58c0cd6a3c9afad9e06ad78059642e3e97715e129f379c0bf6dccdb58e70d05d965f23e7432fd3f02d7f97967a778ffb8e424837891d9d785a9e98964c
cc5c0d2299b09c58cd9962ca5075ffa53f2633c0 refactor: Fix formatting of timedata.cpp (Hennadii Stepanov)
c2410ceb844a443caf6dd8c6df976b9e24724d06 refactor: Replace RecursiveMutex with Mutex in timedata.cpp (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Only `GetTimeOffset()` and `AddTimeData()` functions lock this mutex. They do not call itself recursively, and do not call each other either directly or indirectly. Therefore, the `g_timeoffset_mutex` could be a non-recursive mutex.
Related to #19180.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK cc5c0d2299b09c58cd9962ca5075ffa53f2633c0 , checked the second commit with --word-diff-regex=. --ignore-all-space -U0 🦉
vasild:
ACK cc5c0d22 verified that recursion is not happening
Tree-SHA512: 38f6df689374d4a1a0e9aedb3ed5e885d8285c4da6b75f9bc84ae036936a159ef8276462db33b4f4dd5c71c6312fa9b45380f7a5726959665bc71dc39031be88
78c8f4fe11706cf5c165777c2ca122bd933b8b6a refactor: Replace RecursiveMutex with Mutex in netbase.cpp (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The functions that could lock this mutex, i.e., `{S,G}etProxy()`, `{S,G}etNameProxy()`, `HaveNameProxy()`, `IsProxy()`, do not call itself recursively, and do not call each other either directly or indirectly. Therefore, the `g_proxyinfo_mutex` could be a non-recursive mutex.
Related to #19180.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 78c8f4fe11706cf5c165777c2ca122bd933b8b6a , reviewed with the -W git option 👮
vasild:
ACK 78c8f4fe verified that recursion does not happen
Tree-SHA512: fc077fb371f38af5d05f1383c6bebf9926167c257892936fefd2d4fe6f679ca40124d25099e09f645d8ec266df222f96c5d0f9fd39eddcad15cbde0b427bc205
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
LLMQ_400_85 requires four days worth of LLMQs
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/master/src/llmq/params.h#L416
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
n/a
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
