a35f0c6a99 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22501: netinfo: display addr_{processed, rate_limited, relay_enabled} and relaytxes data (W. J. van der Laan)
f263bea244 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22755: fuzz: Avoid timeout in blockfilter fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
dd26a7a806 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22797: test, doc: refer to the correct variable names in p2p_invalid_tx.py (fanquake)
c3ea99e492 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22780: doc: Remove incorrect INIT_PROTO_VERSION from nTime comment (MarcoFalke)
56c3f844dc Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#22622: util: Check if specified config file cannot be opened (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
bitcoin backports
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 4db8131cb97e4345f598fbef4f73fa601ee837a395ce00acb37e721078b0a13dba8f0a1a8047f2096482fc0c87388b01a2ea7ab2b2b2caacce4ecd55e0377b24
218862a01848f69d54380c780bb5eae6dfdb1416 Display peers in -netinfo that we don't relay addresses to (Jon Atack)
3834e23b251ed7b4a47bbb981faba65b97ecbba0 Display peers in -netinfo that request we not relay transactions (Jon Atack)
0a9ee3a2c787e97213a0456b0d6253c549b71e09 Simplify a few conditionals in -netinfo (Jon Atack)
5eeea8e2575a36587e70743af3bd7c2d87b8cf36 Add addr_processed and addr_rate_limited stats to -netinfo (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Update CLI -netinfo to display the getpeerinfo `addr_processed`, `addr_rate_limited`, `addr_relay_enabled` and `relaytxes` data with auto-adjusting column widths.
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli -netinfo help
txn Time since last novel transaction received from the peer and accepted into our mempool, in minutes
"*" - the peer requested we not relay transactions to it (relaytxes is false)
addrp Total number of addresses processed, excluding those dropped due to rate limiting
"." - we do not relay addresses to this peer (addr_relay_enabled is false)
addrl Total number of addresses dropped due to rate limiting
```
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
Code review and tested ACK 218862a01848f69d54380c780bb5eae6dfdb1416
Zero-1729:
re-tACK 218862a01848f69d54380c780bb5eae6dfdb1416
vasild:
ACK 218862a01848f69d54380c780bb5eae6dfdb1416
jarolrod:
tACK 218862a01848f69d54380c780bb5eae6dfdb1416
Tree-SHA512: bb9da4bdd71859b234f6e4c2c46257a57ef0d0e0b363d2b8fded128bcaa28132f64a0a4651c622e1de1e3b7c05c7587a4369e9e79799895884fda9745c63409d
fa2547fc52b90b4bbde250803df24d7f665383a7 fuzz: Avoid timeout in blockfilter fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Previously it would take 10 seconds to run this input, now it takes 10ms: [clusterfuzz-testcase-blockfilter-5022838196142080.log](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/files/7021883/clusterfuzz-testcase-blockfilter-5022838196142080.log)
The fix is moving the `MatchAny` out of the hot loop.
Also, to avoid unlimited runtime, cap the hot loop at 30k iterations.
ACKs for top commit:
GeneFerneau:
Approach ACK [fa2547f](fa2547fc52)
Tree-SHA512: a04e7388856930ec81222da8f05b665a923fe9482aeb4c55c9be4561aa7320a0703dbbf8d438ae92854e877a8e3b46777a29c0b652b8f34c29c2142cc5d63ccb
0d9fdd329e81cb171d687042290f4e6b1507d7f4 test, doc: refer to the correct variable names in p2p_invalid_tx.py (aitorjs)
Pull request description:
_tx_orphan_no_fee_ and _tx_orphan_invalid_ don't exist as transactions.
Have been replaced by _tx_orphan_2_no_fee_ and _tx_orphan_2_invalid_ respectively.
**Motivation**: Comments are more accurate and easy understandable under the tests context (I think).
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
utACK 0d9fdd329e81cb171d687042290f4e6b1507d7f4
theStack:
ACK 0d9fdd329e81cb171d687042290f4e6b1507d7f4 📃
Tree-SHA512: a4cafd931e51fe2a67085e10e9c61178c864c14982664d112b76327e040af08cd1de04eca4a8ae980fad57ba7078017ce02fc60e7658f38380e8172c2ae28b77
127b4608e9dbb8217c74c9332e82fcec8c326fa8 test: Check if specified config file cannot be opened (nthumann)
6bb54708e6457f21596793a7149dc6dfea1dc871 util: Check if specified config file cannot be opened (nthumann)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22612.
When running e.g. `./src/bitcoind -datadir=/tmp/bitcoin -regtest -conf=/tmp/bitcoin/regtest/bitcoin.conf` and the specified config cannot be opened (doesn't exist, permission denied, ...), the initialization silently uses the default config.
As voidburn already noted:
> I can't think of a situation in which a config file is specified explicitly (in the startup options, as per service unit linked above), but inaccessible, where the fail condition should be to keep booting using defaults instead.
With this patch applied, the initialization will fail immediately, if the specified config file cannot be opened. If no config file is explicitly specified, the behavior is unchanged. This not only affects `bitcoind`, but also `bitcoin-cli` and `bitcoin-qt`.
In the example below the datadir is accessible, but the config file is not due to insufficient permissions:
```
$ ./src/bitcoind -datadir=/tmp/bitcoin -regtest --debug=1 -conf=/tmp/bitcoin/regtest/bitcoin.conf
Error: Error reading configuration file: specified config file "/tmp/bitcoin/regtest/bitcoin.conf" could not be opened.
```
ACKs for top commit:
0xB10C:
ACK 127b4608e9dbb8217c74c9332e82fcec8c326fa8
Zero-1729:
tACK 127b4608e9dbb8217c74c9332e82fcec8c326fa8
theStack:
Tested ACK 127b4608e9dbb8217c74c9332e82fcec8c326fa8
Tree-SHA512: 4fe487921485426f1d1da8d256c388af517b984b639d776aec7b159b3e23b669824093d3bdd31139d9415ed5f5de405b3e6a51b110c8ab471f12b9c99ac67cc1
e1030a058c docs: add release notes for 6140 (pasta)
9ed292a6e1 feat: harden all sporks on mainnet to current values (pasta)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Harden all sporks on the mainnet; they are no longer necessary. Although retaining them might be beneficial in addressing bugs or issues, the greater priority is to protect mainnet by minimizing risks associated with potential centralization or even its perception. Sporks will continue to be valuable for testing on developer networks; however, on mainnet, the risks of maintaining them now outweigh the benefits of retaining them.
## What was done?
Adjust CSporkManager::GetSporkValue to always return 0 for sporks in general and 1 for SPORK_21_QUORUM_ALL_CONNECTED specifically.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Ran main net node with this patch. Sporks show as expected
## Breaking Changes
This is not a breaking change.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
knst:
utACK e1030a058c
UdjinM6:
utACK e1030a058c (CI failure is unrelated)
Tree-SHA512: f20d0f614b7e9d6eb5606c545d0747a9d415f2905512dd6100a2f9fb00bb6de02c8d5aa74cb41aa39163fde0ab05fe472913acc227b1b4afce7e984f8897940d
1bf0bf492f merge bitcoin#24515: Only load BlockMan in BlockMan member functions (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
5c1eb67c42 merge bitcoin#24050: Give m_block_index ownership of CBlockIndexes (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
c440304c85 merge bitcoin#22932: Add CBlockIndex lock annotations, guard nStatus/nFile/nDataPos/nUndoPos by cs_main (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
e303a4ec45 merge bitcoin#23974: Make blockstorage globals private members of BlockManager (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
301163c65e merge bitcoin#23581: Move BlockManager to node/blockstorage (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
732e871a6b merge bitcoin#23785: Move stuff to ChainstateManager (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
b402fd57fa merge bitcoin#23174: have LoadBlockIndex account for snapshot use (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
a08f2f48bf merge bitcoin#21526: UpdateTip/CheckBlockIndex assumeutxo support (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
472caa048a merge bitcoin#22371: Move pblocktree global to BlockManager (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
d69ca833df merge bitcoin#21727: Move more stuff to blockstorage (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
6df927fc60 chore: exclude underscore placeholder from shadowing linter warnings (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Additional Information
* Dependent on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6078
* Dependent on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6074
* Dependent on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6083
* Dependent on https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6119
* Dependency for https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6138
* In [bitcoin#24050](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24050), `BlockMap` is given ownership of the `CBlockIndex` instance contained within the `unordered_map`. The same has not been done for `PrevBlockMap` as `PrevBlockMap` is populated with `pprev` pointers and doing so seems to break validation logic.
* Dash has a specific linter for all Dash-specific code present in Core. The introduction of `util/translation.h` into `validation.h` has caused the linter to trigger shadowing warnings due to a conflict between the common use of `_` as a placeholder/throwaway name ([source](37e026a038/src/spork.cpp (L44))) and upstream's usage of it to process translatable strings ([source](37e026a038/src/util/translation.h (L55-L62))).
Neither C++17 nor C++20 have an _official_ placeholder/throwaway term or annotation for structured bindings (which cannot use `[[maybe_unused]` or `std::ignore`) but [P2169](https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2023/p2169r4.pdf) is a proposal put forth to make it the official placeholder, in that light, the linter will silence shadowing warnings involving an underscore.
## Breaking Changes
None expected
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 1bf0bf492f (with one nit)
knst:
utACK 1bf0bf492f
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 1bf0bf492f
Tree-SHA512: 875fff34fe91916722f017526135697466e521d7179c473a5c0c444e3aa873369019b804dee9f5f795fc7ebed5c2481b5ce2d895b2950782a37de7b098157ad4
bebf391815 fix: build with -Wdocumentation - rename param pwallet to wallet (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
CI failures like that:
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/7400661581
It happened due to 2 PRs merged one after each other without rebasing:
- enabling -Wdocumentation in bitcoin#21631 (#6113)
- renaming param while doxygen comment is forgotten in #6114
## What was done?
It contains changes from https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6133
Thanks Vijay for spotting issue, this PR is DNM if 6133 will get merged faster.
## How Has This Been Tested?
See CI
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK bebf391815
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK bebf391815
Tree-SHA512: 34265f09098c04593a9d52709e5b8aed8460248762655945e5c86a65adb9aa49ab6f0bdb21cd907d353fe6b10e1ff2e07d05528166bf8e2140eb2c9ea1acbd33
It happened due to 2 PRs merged one after each other without rebasing:
- enabling -Wdocumentation in bitcoin#21631 (#6113)
- renaming param while doxygen comment is forgotten in #6114
4731f7045f docs: release notes for bitcoin#21141 - walletnotify %h %b (Konstantin Akimov)
044ddb4c80 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21777: test: Fix feature_notifications.py intermittent issue (MarcoFalke)
5336f42ea8 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#19801: test: check for all possible OP_CLTV fail reasons in feature_cltv.py (BIP 65) (MarcoFalke)
1cc6aa6c83 Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#21691: test: Check that no versionbits are re-used (MarcoFalke)
b55fdf8e68 Merge #21235: p2p: Clarify disconnect log message in ProcessGetBlockData, remove send bool (MarcoFalke)
ddc6fca7f3 Merge #21343: doc: revamp macOS build doc (fanquake)
709652bff7 Merge #21141: wallet: Add new format string placeholders for walletnotify (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
a3bee9c8ec Merge #21424: Net processing: Tidy up CNodeState ctor (MarcoFalke)
aab2a665c3 Merge #20556: rpc: Properly document return values (submitblock, gettxout, getblocktemplate, scantxoutset) (fanquake)
c26722fc0e Merge #21331: rpc: replace wallet raw pointers with references (#18592 rebased) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
## What was done?
Backports from bitcoin v22:
- bitcoin/bitcoin#21331
- bitcoin/bitcoin#20556
- bitcoin/bitcoin#21424
- bitcoin/bitcoin#21141
- bitcoin/bitcoin#21343
- bitcoin/bitcoin#21235
- bitcoin/bitcoin#21691
- bitcoin/bitcoin#19801
- bitcoin/bitcoin#21777
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit and functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 4731f7045f
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 4731f7045f
Tree-SHA512: dcee684563e4e07e838e96df0bf5e49d59e8c85aea6beca3239782e7d90a24f13d828b1201073585b888b0b154b4ba8bb90f88a36e3f923ac03b46f595d75500
121c032e41 fix: avoid calling functions that change wallet state inside of `assert(...)` (UdjinM6)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Functions that change the state should not be called inside `assert`s
kudos to @kwvg for noticing https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/6116#discussion_r1681163803
## What was done?
Move them out
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
kwvg:
LGTM, utACK 121c032e41
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 121c032e41
Tree-SHA512: 42b6f55a62b05e3e632febf92f9d5ac63f32a7754fdd9dffa816d71cb0f72a32ac8315fba5ed96d8bc652728e768f2eb399e5ebb4aa39afe1546fa16e1046347
5943c93bdd feat: introduce `coinjoinsalt` RPC to allow manipulating per-wallet salt (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
4fa3d396f4 wallet: refactor `InitCoinJoinSalt()` to allow for setting a custom salt (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
Pull request description:
## Motivation
CoinJoin utilizes a salt to randomize the number of rounds used in a mixing session (introduced in [dash#3661](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/3661)). This was done to frustrate attempts at deobfuscating CoinJoin mixing transactions but also has the effect of deciding the mixing threshold at which a denomination is considered "sufficiently mixed", which in turn is tied this salt, that is in turn, tied to the wallet.
With wallets that utilized keypool generation, this was perfectly acceptable as each key was unrelated to the other and any meaningful attempts to backup/restore a wallet would entail backing up the entire wallet database, which includes the salt. Meaning, on restore, the wallet would show CoinJoin balances as reported earlier.
With the default activation of HD wallets in legacy wallets (and the introduction of descriptor wallets that construct HD wallets by default), addresses are deterministically generated and backups no longer _require_ a backup of the wallet database wholesale.
Users who export their mnemonic and import them into a new wallet will find themselves with a different reported CoinJoin balance (see below).
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/assets/63189531/dccf1b17-55af-423d-8c36-adea6163e060
## Demo
**Based on [`c00a3665`](c00a366578)**
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/assets/63189531/c60c10e3-e414-46af-a64e-60605a4e6d07
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
ACK 5943c93bdd
Tree-SHA512: 8e5bdd18ecce4c14683fbeb1812b0b683a5a5b38405653655c3a14b1ab32a22b244b198087876cd53ca12447c2027432afe4259ef3043be7fddf640911d998f0
e65984e173 refactor: remove unused includes from unit tests (Konstantin Akimov)
Pull request description:
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Noticed there were some not used includes in Unit tests and removed them.
It's not exhaustive list of unused headers, just something that was easy to spot.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Just build and see that there's no build error.
This PR also slightly reduced compilation time of project, it's measurable big changes to6-8 seconds of one CPU core faster. Tested by compiling only files that changed in single-thread:
```
$ rm src/test/test_dash-blockfilter_index_tests.o src/test/test_dash-block_reward_reallocation_tests.o src/test/test_dash-denialofservice_tests.o src/test/test_dash-dynamic_activation_thresholds_tests.o src/test/test_dash-validation_block_tests.o src/test/test_dash-validation_chainstate_tests.o src/test/test_dash-validation_flush_tests.o src/test/util/libtest_util_a-mining.o src/test/util/libtest_util_a-setup_common.o
$ cd src/test ; time make -j1
```
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK e65984e173
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK e65984e173
Tree-SHA512: 445c1515aee09e946eb73f12ca9c8064d26cd6148d2286fa079bf54806ea77af9eda890a36c8f34450791e868fbe933183bc7e507dd6e667304ccd92790bb009
252ffee815 fix: adjust doxygen for dash codebase for -Wdocumentation (Konstantin Akimov)
4f260cd4b1 fix: ignore warnings for dashbls/ (Konstantin Akimov)
0afffcccc4 Merge #21613: build: enable -Wdocumentation (fanquake)
Pull request description:
## What was done?
Backport bitcoin#21613 to enable -Wdocumentation and related fixes for dash code
## How Has This Been Tested?
Build with clang compiler and see no failures anymore with `--enable-werror`
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ACKs for top commit:
UdjinM6:
utACK 252ffee815
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK 252ffee815
Tree-SHA512: 1670076665e26228567042ed33ce149780c3992aaa78cdeafeefdc5609b1d1590034a3a2ddc056b69120b2b4e8b0dffaff729b8178043aebe19b1c5880a10d0d
Bitcoin uses underscore in util/translation.h for translatable strings
but underscores are also a placeholder used in multiple languages, incl.
C++. The next commit will be introducing backports, one of them will be
placing util/translation.h into validation.h, which is a header used by
Dash-specific code.
This causes a conflict between the normal usage of underscore as a
placeholder and Bitcoin's usage of it as a function name, which is
reported by the Dash-specific linter. We need to exclude shadowing
warnings from the linter to account for this.
b01cd9471f435bb36b8ed5211a56baad51111ad2 test: check that _all_ invalid-CLTV txs are rejected after BIP65 activation (Sebastian Falbesoner)
dbc19814743cb12960a99793197c811e2750a06b test: check that _all_ invalid-CLTV txs are allowed in a block pre-BIP65 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
8d0ce50c4826529a2d30ffc850bce4d44da6019b test: prepare cltv_invalidate to test all failure reasons in feature_cltv.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
ce994e1202c4820b1ad5c375d3d671fd0a18e092 test: add tx modfication helper function in feature_cltv.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The functional test for [BIP65](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0065.mediawiki) / `OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` (`feature_cltv.py`) currently only tests one out of five conditions that lead to failure of the op-code -- by prepending the script `OP_1NEGATE OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to a tx's first input's scriptSig, the case of "_the top item on the stack is less than 0_" is checked:
f8462a6d27/test/functional/feature_cltv.py (L26-L35)
This PR adds the other cases (5 in total) by taking an integer argument to the function `cltv_invalidate` that is called in a loop instead of only once per testing scenario. Here is the full list of failure conditions and how they are tested (note that the scriptSig should still be valid before activation of BIP65, when `OP_CLTV` is simply a no-op):
* _the stack is empty_
➡️ prepending `OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY` to scriptSig
* _the top item on the stack is less than 0_
➡️ prepending `OP_1NEGATE OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to scriptSig
* _the lock-time type (height vs. timestamp) of the top stack item and the nLockTime field are not the same_
➡️ prepending `OPNum(1000) OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to scriptSig
➡️ setting tx.vin[0].nSequence=0 and tx.nCheckTimeLock=1296688602 (genesis block timestamp)
* _the top stack item is greater than the transaction's nLockTime field_
➡️ prepending `OPNum(1000) OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to scriptSig
➡️ setting tx.vin[0].nSequence=0 and tx.nCheckTimeLock=500
* _the nSequence field of the txin is 0xffffffff_
➡️ prepending `OPNum(500) OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP` to scriptSig
➡️ setting tx.vin[0].nSequence=0xffffffff and tx.nCheckTimeLock=500
The first commit creates a helper function for the tx modification and also includes some tidying up like turning single-line to multi-line Python imports where necessary and cleaning up some PEP8 warnings. The second commit prepares the invalidation function `cltv_invalidate` and the third and the fourth use it and check for the expected reject reason strings ("Operation not valid with the current stack size", "Negative locktime" and "Locktime requirement not satisfied").
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK b01cd9471f435bb36b8ed5211a56baad51111ad2 🐣
Tree-SHA512: dd82ae86e2bc4f3ab9bb1cfc9f04e4431b2b59c8aaf2a9f4b28654a1577e003fb43c500f99d76ff57e96262168e1cad7c1a0d71158e4b01063737e8f4be1e07d
fa8eaee6a8531db970cc84436bf2ae8150a58642 test: Run versionbits_sanity for all chains (MarcoFalke)
faec1e9ee1f12612831ad5b0f0a767d87bd2d024 test: Address outstanding versionbits_test feedback (MarcoFalke)
fad4167871c3c9fde462e64e3ef3be937e585084 test: Check that no versionbits are re-used (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK fa8eaee6a8531db970cc84436bf2ae8150a58642
ajtowns:
ACK fa8eaee6a8531db970cc84436bf2ae8150a58642 code review only
Tree-SHA512: e99ffcca8970921fd07fa9e04cf1ea2515a317409865d34ddfd70be0f0b0616b29d1fad58262d96a3c3418c0cf7018a6a955802a178b8f78f6ecfaa30a37d91c
fa8177324392c923c6ce39056cfd870af55ab673 style-only: Remove whitespace (MarcoFalke)
fae77b9e6dc9e59b355d56df49c4d9685b6f40a4 net: Simplify ProcessGetBlockData execution by removing send flag. (Patrick Strateman)
fae7c0429f96e08bcac944f6fa30264636dfda8c log: Clarify that block request below NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED_MIN_BLOCKS disconnects (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
* Clarify that "ignoring" really means "disconnect" in the log
* Revive a refactor I took from #13670
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK fa8177324392c923c6ce39056cfd870af55ab673
sipa:
utACK fa8177324392c923c6ce39056cfd870af55ab673
Tree-SHA512: 0a4fcb979cb82c4e26012881eeaf903c38dfbb85d461476c01e35294760744746a79c48ffad827fe31c1b830f40c6e4240529c71e375146e4d0313c3b7d784ca
c180c911b88b2bd2baf2c9c2b24e276787ffb69b doc: revamp macOS build doc (Jarol Rodriguez)
Pull request description:
This PR makes the macOS build-docs more informative and adds in the following information:
- Proper descriptions and delineation of required/optional dependencies
- walk-through of optional dependencies
- configuration walk-through
- various other tidbits of information
This is a part of the efforts done in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20601 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20610 to update the docs and introduce some consistency between them.
This update does not add instructions for arm-based M1 Macbooks as I do not have one to test with. It would be nice to have someone follow up with an update containing instructions for arm-based Macs.
**Before/Master:** [render](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/build-osx.md)
**After/PR:** [render](c180c911b8/doc/build-osx.md)
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK c180c911b88b2bd2baf2c9c2b24e276787ffb69b - I still think these are getting too verbose and we're duplicating information all over the place; dependencies, configure options, combinations of options etc. However if people are happy to maintain them, I guess it's fine for now, and this revamping has already happened for some of the other build READMEs.
Tree-SHA512: 1440046c723fe80d4158e4a429e3aa8bd93570acb84ad202d5d24c749ab9a89a3aca8b61b49e75e042a4bf4317acd632d3906e1b5808a9052e74209256528b45
06e1fb0b170a69996a7ce1ef5203785a7bc6b278 Add new format string placeholders for walletnotify to include relevant block information for transactions (Maayan Keshet)
Pull request description:
This patch includes two new format placeholders for walletnotify:
%b - the hash of the block containting the transaction (zeroed if a mempool transaction)
%h - the height of the block containing the transaction (zero if a mempool transaction)
I've included test suite changes to check and validate the above functional requirements as well as doc/help description changes.
**Motivation**
The walletnotify option is used to be notified of new transactions relevant to the wallet of the node.
A common usage pattern is to perform afterwards additional RPC calls to determine:
1. If this is a mempool transaction or not (i.e. are there any confirmations?)
2. What block was it included in?
3. Did this transaction was seen before and is now seen again because of a fork?
All of these questions can be answered with the current features, but the resulting RPC calls may be expensive in a heavily used node. As this information is readily available when calling the walletnotify callback, it makes sense to save expensive round trips by optionally sending this information at that point in time. I can definitely say we would like to use it in Fireblocks, my employer.
Please let me know of any questions and suggestions.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 06e1fb0b170a69996a7ce1ef5203785a7bc6b278
Tree-SHA512: d2744e2a7a883f9c3a9fd32237110e048c4b6b11fea8221c33d10b74157f65bbc4351211f441e8c1a4af5d5d38e2ba6b1943a7673dc18860c0553d7b41e00775
