<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
adds release notes
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5123#issuecomment-1367737056
## What was done?
run `gen-manpages.sh` for 18.2.0 (on top of #5127 to include correct
assumevalid values)
## How Has This Been Tested?
n/a
## Breaking Changes
none
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
Added the fields `numValidMembers` and `healthRatio` in `quorum
listextended` RPC reply, as we need a quick way to see the health of all
quorums with a single command.
`healthRatio` range is `[0.0 - 1.0]`
Note: The decision to include both fields was taken because we need
cover the case where a quorum was created with `minSize` members but all
of them were valid.
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Provide a general summary of your changes in the Title above
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it
improves
Dash Core user experience or Dash Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always
welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see
`src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests
cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new
tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or
an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the
bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope
issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should
first
consider building the system outside of Dash Core, if possible.
-->
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
- At the request of Platform team, this RPC should accept `height`
instead of `count`. RPC replies with the signing quorums active at
requested `height`. If `height` isn't specified, then tip is used for
the construction of the reply.
- Corrections were made on the description of reply model.
## What was done?
<!--- Describe your changes in detail -->
## How Has This Been Tested?
<!--- Please describe in detail how you tested your changes. -->
<!--- Include details of your testing environment, and the tests you ran
to -->
<!--- see how your change affects other areas of the code, etc. -->
## Breaking Changes
<!--- Please describe any breaking changes your code introduces -->
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
should fix#5090
## What was done?
calculate `nStartHeight` only when it's really needed and using only a
subset of cache that matters for such caclulations
## How Has This Been Tested?
`time dash-cli getblockchaininfo`
before: `real 0m9.211s`
after: `real 0m0.164s`
## Breaking Changes
hopefully none
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
kudos to @nmarley for noticing the issue, @thephez for
testing/confirming/documenting it and to @knst for finding the exact
piece of slow code 👍
This array contains 119 items and all of them are used.
But during test created one extra block that also need `blockinfo`.
It is UB and trigger address sanitizer.
* Added quorum listextended
* Indentation fix
* Added release notes
* Added quorum listextended func test
* Refactored reply into map
* fix: change type from ARR to OBJ_DYN to properly print out the placeholder
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* llmq: move initialization logic to 'LLMQContext', add unique pointer to NodeContext
* llmq: add aliases to LLMQ globals, expose them to RPC via LLMQContext
* rpc: replace most global invocations with LLMQContext aliases
* rpc: replace quorum RPC global invocations with LLMQContext aliases
* llmq: replace individual global member arguments with context pointer
* llmq: pass aliased context pointer instead of individual globals in tests
* llmq: move BLS worker to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq: move DKG debug manager to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq: move DKG session manager to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq: move quorum share manager to LLMQContext, remove global
* llmq: move quorum signing manager to LLMQContext, remove global
d71e29e3e828bcb7b702fad728546351b8db5c01 qa: Correct epoll_ctl data race suppression (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Fixup of #20218. Comments must start from the beginning of the line.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK d71e29e3e828bcb7b702fad728546351b8db5c01
Tree-SHA512: 4d8663ab505c347bcb62c2f118656e3343d5179825be0d1b86761ffdfdae1e7462002bf226a54dfc94be5885ce7f2633abaf70421ea35bf06eddad8e99fb9683
02ac445b2fec60e028d2cc93bbf74a35e3d0f48e bump libevent to 2.1.11 in depends (stefanwouldgo)
Pull request description:
this doesn't need patches on Android anymore like 2.1.8 did.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 02ac445b2fec60e028d2cc93bbf74a35e3d0f48e
Tree-SHA512: 1fbfe342ee15fa4c5cb417979bd6c443f7c7aa40a489accf8ccd7c919e5b08e859b3da6edeee3de484f6f156b35dd4e97c7e2c7971b59fc31029865585ccb296
880d4aaf81f3d5d7fbb915905c2e61b816a6a747 build: use BOOST_NO_CXX98_FUNCTION_BASE to suppress warnings (fanquake)
1bdbbbdc46c4e50bf07bc362e7e391ea1a53ea2f build: suppress array-bounds errors in libxkbcommon (fanquake)
Pull request description:
2 changes to better support building with GCC 12, which out of the box, is currently broken if you want to build using depends.
Prevent `-Warray-bounds` errors when building libxkbcommon. i.e:
```bash
src/xkbcomp/ast-build.c:82:27: error: array subscript 'ExprDef[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'unsigned char[32]' [-Werror=array-bounds]
82 | expr->expr.value_type = type;
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
src/xkbcomp/ast-build.c:75:21: note: object of size 32 allocated by 'malloc'
75 | ExprDef *expr = malloc(size);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
```
It might be the case that these would be fixed by updating the
package, but that would also require installing new build tools (meson),
as well as potentially more dependencies (wayland), and it'd need
testing with Qt. For now, just turn the errors into wanrings.
Define `BOOST_NO_CXX98_FUNCTION_BASE` to prevent GCC warning about the use of `std::unary_function`. i.e:
```bash
/bitcoin/depends/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/include/boost/container_hash/hash.hpp:131:33:
warning: 'template<class _Arg, class _Result> struct std::unary_function' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
131 | struct hash_base : std::unary_function<T, std::size_t> {};
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /usr/include/c++/12/bits/unique_ptr.h:37,
from /usr/include/c++/12/memory:76,
from ./init.h:10,
from init.cpp:10:
/usr/include/c++/12/bits/stl_function.h:117:12: note: declared here
117 | struct unary_function
```
Boost `container_hash` (included via functional -> multi_index) uses
[`std::unary_function`, which was deprecated in C++11](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/utility/functional/unary_function), and "removed" in
C++17. It's use causes warnings with newer compilers, i.e GCC 12.1.
Use the MACRO outlined in https://github.com/boostorg/container_hash/issues/22, and added to Boost Config for GCC 12 in https://github.com/boostorg/config/pull/430, to prevent it's use.
[BOOST_NO_CXX98_FUNCTION_BASE](https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/master/libs/config/doc/html/boost_config/boost_macro_reference.html):
> The standard library no longer supports std::unary_function and std::binary_function.
> They were deprecated in C++11 and is removed from C++14.
Guix Build (x86_64):
```bash
```
Guix Build (arm64):
```bash
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 880d4aaf81f3d5d7fbb915905c2e61b816a6a747
Tree-SHA512: 10c4679c3eb788e9279acc4960731c55ae1568bd3df525d3c46f97d8b0319e7d8450b1638b6777d98111b5991dba5c787e95d80b1ac932e0b4779d4b8e74875e
