## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Masternodes tab was showing UNKNOWN next payment for some enabled MNs
reported by @kxcd aka xkcd
## What was done?
ask for the maximum data available, let GetProjectedMNPayees crop it
## How Has This Been Tested?
run dash-qt, check the list on Masternodes tab
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
cbf2d75d8f49b7b1e32acb5373b312b484f3fa6a qa: Add getdescriptorinfo functional test (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
The `getdescriptorinfo` RPC was added in #15368, this PR adds some tests.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 5bf3fb5842b975089821c7ac52202ecb23df255f655862646eb532e38e335ff963f8973bcf5b8bba386183281dc9bfe7279ba1cf25fd518c9a45fb45a9243e4d
d484279a46fe2cd5e133b6c18a1e00f802084772 test: add logging to wallet_listsinceblock.py (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is the first commit from #17535.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: bb4f527a41bca3ffbf69e910311ce7f85dcc7a2be41350b3c653a27f4044f392b7e528f330e9691f497212469f6b16ce263230bb7a919548dd4e3e21cc72142f
2455aa5d7f54befeade05795ed8f5dd89d01042a [rpc] changed MineBlocksOnDemand to IsMockableChain (Gloria Zhao)
Pull request description:
Change: Update the if statement in `setmocktime` to use `IsMockableChain` chainparams function (aka `m_is_mockable_chain`) instead of `MineBlocksOnDemand`
Rationale: It's a more appropriate check for whether or not chain is in RegTest, as [discussed](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18037#discussion_r376509388) in #18037
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 2455aa5d7f54befeade05795ed8f5dd89d01042a 🙇
jonatack:
ACK 2455aa5d7f54befeade05795ed8f5dd89d01042a
Tree-SHA512: 1d8c8b7ff0b3c1bcbf5755194969b6664fe05a35003375ad08d18e34bcefd2df4f64d0e60078a10bbef3c8f469a9b9d07db467089b55c14cf532304bc965bffc
9b0e16226e6c1fb6a3550d635339f1bbb49a852f doc: Correct spelling errors in comments (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
And ci script output.
Identified via test/lint/lint-spelling
Before:
```
$ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh
ci/test/05_before_script.sh:29: explicitely ==> explicitly
src/compressor.h:43: Ser ==> Set
src/compressor.h:78: Ser ==> Set
src/logging/timer.h:88: outputing ==> outputting
src/node/psbt.cpp:87: minumum ==> minimum
src/qt/coincontroldialog.cpp:372: UnSelect ==> deselect
src/qt/coincontroldialog.cpp:443: unselect ==> deselect
src/qt/coincontroldialog.cpp:448: UnSelect ==> deselect
src/qt/coincontroldialog.cpp:699: UnSelect ==> deselect
src/serialize.h:211: Ser ==> Set
src/serialize.h:213: Ser ==> Set
src/serialize.h:228: Ser ==> Set
src/serialize.h:246: Ser ==> Set
src/serialize.h:484: Ser ==> Set
src/serialize.h:490: Ser ==> Set
src/serialize.h:510: Ser ==> Set
src/serialize.h:622: Ser ==> Set
src/serialize.h:740: Ser ==> Set
src/test/base32_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for
src/test/base64_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for
src/txmempool.h:756: incomaptible ==> incompatible
src/undo.h:26: Ser ==> Set
src/wallet/coincontrol.h:74: UnSelect ==> deselect
test/functional/feature_backwards_compatibility.py:116: Abondon ==> Abandon
test/functional/rpc_getaddressinfo_label_deprecation.py:7: superceded ==> superseded
test/lint/lint-shell.sh:44: desriptor ==> descriptor
^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt
```
After:
```
$ test/lint/lint-spelling.sh
src/test/base32_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for
src/test/base64_tests.cpp:14: fo ==> of, for
test/functional/rpc_getaddressinfo_label_deprecation.py:7: superceded ==> superseded
^ Warning: codespell identified likely spelling errors. Any false positives? Add them to the list of ignored words in test/lint/lint-spelling.ignore-words.txt
```
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 9b0e16226e6c1fb6a3550d635339f1bbb49a852f
MarcoFalke:
ACK 9b0e16226e6c1fb6a3550d635339f1bbb49a852f
Tree-SHA512: 9ce203700b11596e4b920b3c5b04f59bc7784fe5b495868d43423608180a9a553ec7efcc5ad70384f3ce462b036c2a682260efebce493c5e6a3d48716b268179
7bf4ce4f644bb7dac9b63172c656b5d599eedea3 refactor: test/bench: dedup SetupDummyInputs() (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The only difference between `SetupDummyInputs()` in `test/transaction_tests.cpp` and the one in `bench/ccoins_caching.cpp` was the nValue amounts of the outputs, so we allow to pass those in an extra (fixed-size) array parameter.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 7bf4ce4f64, only change is schuffling includes 🚶
Empact:
ACK 7bf4ce4f64
Tree-SHA512: e13643b2470f6b6ab429da0c0a8eebd4cb41e2ff2e421ef36f85fa4847bf4ea8aab88d59a01e94cac4c4eb85edb561463f02215b174c50b573ac6bbcc2bf98a3
54be4e71d898de8f14e3269550d56097c023d1cc test: check specific reject reasons in feature_csv_activation.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This is kind of a prequel to #17921: increases the general quality of the functional test `feature_csv_activation.py` by checking for the specific reject reasons whenever the sending of a block fails. To get the reason, we have to limit the script threads to 1 via the parameter `-par=1`, like it is also done in `feature_cltv.py`:
a654626f07/test/functional/feature_cltv.py (L57-L61)
The commit also fixes a bug that was uncovered with this checks: for the BIP112 version 1 tx tests, txs from `bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v1` have been add twice to the list `failed_txs`:
a654626f07/test/functional/feature_csv_activation.py (L396-L397)
leading also to a block rejection as expected but for the wrong reason. It seems one of those two tx lists was meant to be `bip112txs_vary_OP_CSV_v1` (without the `_9`) and it was a typo.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 54be4e71d898de8f14e3269550d56097c023d1cc 📶
Tree-SHA512: 9aac11aee3f53f1ae95ddb346a2f268872038f4d118c8dcf81b8201dee869774c9f3c3f1c326e370b8fd4eaf8e0673371689a96d9b1cb91be4286c88824725c3
e4f4ea47ebf7774fb6f445adde7bf7ea71fa05a1 lint: Catch use of [] or {} as default parameter values in Python functions (practicalswift)
25dd86715039586d92176eee16e9c6644d2547f0 Avoid using mutable default parameter values (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Avoid common Python default parameter gotcha when mutable `dict`/`list`:s are used as default parameter values.
Examples of this gotcha caught during review:
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16673#discussion_r317415261
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14565#discussion_r241942304
Perhaps surprisingly this is how mutable list and dictionary default parameter values behave in Python:
```
>>> def f(i, j=[], k={}):
... j.append(i)
... k[i] = True
... return j, k
...
>>> f(1)
([1], {1: True})
>>> f(1)
([1, 1], {1: True})
>>> f(2)
([1, 1, 2], {1: True, 2: True})
```
In contrast to:
```
>>> def f(i, j=None, k=None):
... if j is None:
... j = []
... if k is None:
... k = {}
... j.append(i)
... k[i] = True
... return j, k
...
>>> f(1)
([1], {1: True})
>>> f(1)
([1], {1: True})
>>> f(2)
([2], {2: True})
```
The latter is typically the intended behaviour.
This PR fixes two instances of this and adds a check guarding against this gotcha going forward :-)
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Oh Python... ACK e4f4ea47ebf7774fb6f445adde7bf7ea71fa05a1. Testing tip: swap the two commits.
Tree-SHA512: 56e14d24fc866211a20185c9fdb274ed046c3aed2dc0e07699e58b6f9fa3b79f6d0c880fb02d72b7fe5cc5eb7c0ff6da0ead33123344e1a872209370c2e49e3f
403e372407db1d020eedede4d322ee79d4a85dfc qa: Relax so that the subscriber is ready before publishing zmq messages (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Prevents the syndrome "slow joiner" - see http://zguide.zeromq.org/py:all#sockets-and-patterns - by relaxing before publishing messages.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
unsigned ACK 403e372407db1d020eedede4d322ee79d4a85dfc
Tree-SHA512: 0e856accbc450a9b09160bdce5112b2103dc9436cc317d31fb1c9634ebd76823a300a2e727818057fb4d0a615271772ff23e80553a13e9aa1935500de5eeec5f
2483266c591f7b2e62df68ee2d13740a706415ec packages.md: document depends build targets (Russell Yanofsky)
be27161ee4bb7cb63346f1e79fc36ce33103a635 Clarify need to specify --prefix with depends (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
There seems to be some confusion about exactly how to use depends, when to pass a prefix to `./configure` etc (see #16367, #16654).
I've cherry-picked two of russ's commits out of #16367, as they are clear stand-alone improvements and we don't have to wait for #16367 to improve the depends documentation.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK 2483266
hebasto:
ACK 2483266c591f7b2e62df68ee2d13740a706415ec, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
jonasschnelli:
ACK 2483266c591f7b2e62df68ee2d13740a706415ec
Tree-SHA512: a198c288248f573519a3b0ef384626b61cc803803280af9a448c28466e3d9949bed0332af6618dac19e81c5a6e9694afa83d976b176fd13c32a6c2c3fea3fc1f
faebf6271467048dc8a9a0c526a0f8565023a966 rpc: Use Join helper in rpc/util (MarcoFalke)
fa8cd6f9c13319baca467864661982a3dfb2320c util: Add Join helper to join a list of strings (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
We have a lot of enumerations in the code and sometimes those enumerations need to be mentioned in the RPC or command line documentation. Previously, each caller would have a couple of lines inline to join the strings or the joined string is hardcoded in the documentation. A helper to join strings would make code such as https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16629#discussion_r315852446 less verbose and easier to read.
Also, warnings commonly accumulate in complex RPCs, since a warning doesn't lead to an early return. A helper to join those warnings would make code such as https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16394/files#r309324997 less verbose and easier to read.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK faebf6271467048dc8a9a0c526a0f8565023a966
Tree-SHA512: 80f2db86a05c63b686f510585c1c631250271a8958fd71fafaac91559ffd2ec25d609bf7d53412ba27f87eff5893ac9dd9c2f296fc0c73581556e1d6a734a36f
dc1bc1c503233c42850819b544578b756299e071 doc: Add ZMQ dependencies to Fedora build (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Without `zeromq-devel` package on Fedora 30:
```
$ ./configure | grep zmq
configure: WARNING: libzmq version 4.x or greater not found, disabling
with zmq = no
```
With installed `zeromq-devel`:
```
$ ./configure | grep zmq
with zmq = yes
```
Also this PR improves style in the `miniupnpc` related paragraphs.
ACKs for top commit:
emilengler:
Concept ACK dc1bc1c
practicalswift:
ACK dc1bc1c503233c42850819b544578b756299e071 -- diff looks correct
fanquake:
ACK dc1bc1c503233c42850819b544578b756299e071 - tested in a Fedora 30 Docker container. Other changes match the Ubuntu & Debian docs above.
Tree-SHA512: 89b083a6256e8d0bcb9f0b193af84bc680843fdbb4a3e8871086477875250ad0ae214ce08797fc70c0cb04a2969632840c805a2a10a433763ee31cd1aa793bac
37f2784952cb6f598f82922f9ce71d40c9d74e26 tests: Use colors and dots in test_runner.py output only if standard output is a terminal -- allows for using the test runner output as input to other programs (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Use colors and dots in `test_runner.py` output only if standard output is a terminal -- allows for using the test runner output as input to other programs.
I found the need for this when parsing `test_runner.py` output while investigating intermittent functional test failures.
Before:
```
$ test/functional/test_runner.py wallet_hd.py > output 2>&1
$ less output
Temporary test directory at /tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20190807_074115
ESC[1mWARNING!ESC[0m There is already a bitcoind process running on this system. Tests may fail unexpectedly due to resource contention!
Remaining jobs: [wallet_hd.py]
.......................................^M ^M1/1 - ESC[1mwallet_hd.pyESC[0m passed, Duration: 20 s
ESC[1mTEST | STATUS | DURATION
ESC[0mESC[0;32mwallet_hd.py | ✓ Passed | 20 s
ESC[0mESC[1m
ALL | ✓ Passed | 20 s (accumulated)
ESC[0mRuntime: 20 s
```
After:
```
$ test/functional/test_runner.py wallet_hd.py > output 2>&1
$ less output
Temporary test directory at /tmp/test_runner_₿_🏃_20190807_074244
1/1 - wallet_hd.py passed, Duration: 20 s
WARNING! There is already a bitcoind process running on this system. Tests may fail unexpectedly due to resource contention!
Remaining jobs: [wallet_hd.py]
TEST | STATUS | DURATION
wallet_hd.py | ✓ Passed | 20 s
ALL | ✓ Passed | 20 s (accumulated)
Runtime: 20 s
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 37f2784952cb6f598f82922f9ce71d40c9d74e26
Tree-SHA512: f15d95f9e07de2954c326d63d7a4bcd2971faeaa00386600dec2fb915ec89475aeef1dbc968b2c12aa5e988d4b3ed1974d6da0b6a3f1e1a105cfd90e8cb97cf6
afc0966d725aeeb8842dc264bd48f0e9c41f6a34 Moved and renamed hash256 from util.py to zmq_interface.py (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
Right now there are two `hash256(bytes)` in the test framework:
first: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/util.py#L186
second: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/test_framework/messages.py#L60
While they have the same name they're actually doing different things, one just does a sha256d and the other sha256d and reverses the bytes.
so I renamed the second one to be `hash256r` to signify that it's hash256 reversed.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
unsigned ACK afc0966d725aeeb8842dc264bd48f0e9c41f6a34
fanquake:
ACK afc0966d725aeeb8842dc264bd48f0e9c41f6a34
Tree-SHA512: fb0e2db6f09c0248d92f2fd72d05a78cec1bebb44449239dbeecefa62cf4bd01d180b2e6dbcee48a8a9cea79a909e224256cabdd0739f334c2943647fe0c5fe4
b7b9f6e4cee262004643e2fe03d56cb47fdbf5c2 Remove p2pEnabled from Chain interface (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
RPC server starts in warmup mode, it can't process yet calls, then follows connection manager initialization and finally RPC server get out of warmup mode. RPC calls shouldn't be able to get P2P disabled errors because once we initialize g_connman it's not unset until shutdown, after RPC server has been stopped.
@mzumsande comment in #15713 let me thought that `p2pEnabled` was maybe useless, `g_connman` is always initialized before RPC server is getting out of warmup. These checks against P2P state were introduced in 5b446dd5b1.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK b7b9f6e4cee262004643e2fe03d56cb47fdbf5c2
jnewbery:
ACK b7b9f6e4cee262004643e2fe03d56cb47fdbf5c2
Tree-SHA512: 4de2b9fc496bf8347ff5cc645848a5a44c8ca7596cd134f17f3088f5f8262d1d88b8e2a052df93e309ec9a81956a808df17a9eb9f10d4f4d693c95d607fe3561
fa76285fddac613c518e73b35a7486ad2ab4b992 test: Explain why -whitelist is used in feature_fee_estimation (MarcoFalke)
faff85a69a5eb0fdfd8d9a24bc27d1812e49a152 test: Format feature_fee_estimation with pep8 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa76285fddac613c518e73b35a7486ad2ab4b992 -- diff looks correct
Sjors:
ACK fa76285, every bit of clarification helps. It's clear that without `-whitelist` the test becomes extremely slow (it does pass).
Tree-SHA512: 13ec7e4cd0409e7bb76cbcd344e31c0f612c8ce4a1f1ec6ceaedf345f634bc09786ed38d38920c3469b2862c856ee3e5e42534ef90f531bd8dc83c3db3c06417
80ba4241a6773590f6b2c18dae758097b5adc02e extract min & max depth onto coin control (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
- Refactor `AvailableCoins` to pull min & max depths from coin control.
- Add `m_max_depth` to coin control to support this.
- Addresses issue https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15823, see thread for further details.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 80ba4241a6773590f6b2c18dae758097b5adc02e
Tree-SHA512: 8f7c0aa90b3bc3667baf6741b1da2829f3919e1df92ae097d86c6b239f0c024eb410d7100e6251ea8fc49d022fb5a1214bf79b0f8b0014945b7784b2311647d1
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix typos in getrawtransaction and decoderawtransaction help texts
## What was done?
tweak field name to match
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/src/core_write.cpp#L192
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
should fix "qdata: Already received" discouraging issue
the root of the issue is that we remove expired requests on
UpdatedBlockTip which is too late sometimes.
## What was done?
replacing expired requests with a new one in RequestQuorumData kind of
does the same (drops the expired request) but without waiting for
UpdatedBlockTip
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
8a22fd01140bd957036fc00419b147e4268ae9b1 avoided os-dependant path (Ferdinando M. Ametrano)
Pull request description:
The current code fails on windows because of the forward slashes; using os.path.join solves the problem and it is in general more robust
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 8a22fd01140bd957036fc00419b147e4268ae9b1
Tree-SHA512: 813f27aea33f97c8afac52e716a55fc5d7fb69621023aba99d40df7e1d145e0ec8d1eee49ddd403b219bf0e0e168e0e987b05c78eaef611f744d99bf2fc8bc91
ca185cf5a14b16d61814d7172284bc8efcd28b69 doc: Document differences in bitcoind and bitcoin-qt locale handling (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Document differences in `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-qt` locale handling.
Since this seems to be the root cause to the locale dependency issues we've seen over the years I thought it was worth documenting :)
Note that 1.) `QLocale` (used by Qt), 2.) C locale (used by locale-sensitive C standard library functions/POSIX functions and some parts of the C++ standard library such as `std::to_string`) and 3.) C++ locale (used by the C++ input/output library) are three separate things. This comment is about the perhaps surprising interference with the C locale (2) that takes place as part of the Qt initialization.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK ca185cf5a14b16d61814d7172284bc8efcd28b69
Tree-SHA512: e51c32f3072c506b0029a001d8b108125e1acb4f2b6a48a6be721ddadda9da0ae77a9b39ff33f9d9eebabe2244c1db09e8502e3e7012d7a5d40d98e96da0dc44
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
RPC help has a wrongly generated RPC help output in CLI and online help:
https://dashcore.readme.io/docs/core-api-ref-remote-procedure-calls-wallet#getwalletinfo
New version:
```
...
"hdaccounts" : [ (json array)
{ (json object)
"hdaccountindex" : n, (numeric) the index of the account
"hdexternalkeyindex" : n, (numeric) current external childkey index
"hdinternalkeyindex" : n (numeric) current internal childkey index
},
...
],
...
```
against old version:
```
...
"" : [ (json array)
{ (json object)
"hdaccountindex" : n, (numeric) the index of the account
"hdexternalkeyindex" : n, (numeric) current external childkey index
"hdinternalkeyindex" : n (numeric) current internal childkey index
},
...
],
...
```
## What was done?
Add a missing name `hdaccounts` for that key for `getwalletinfo` RPC
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run a command `help getwalletinfo` for old and for new versions.
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes. It doesn't change rpc, only change text description
(help).
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
add a bias to IsExpired to avoid potential timing issues where nodeA thinks it's been 300 seconds but nodeB only thinks it's been 295 for some reason
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix `p2p_quorum_data.py` test broken by #5276
## What was done?
adjust data request expiration timeout in tests
## How Has This Been Tested?
`./test/functional/test_runner.py p2p_quorum_data.py`
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix `p2p_quorum_data.py` test broken by #5276
## What was done?
adjust data request expiration timeout in tests
## How Has This Been Tested?
`./test/functional/test_runner.py p2p_quorum_data.py`
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Added logs with requested parameters (`llmqType`, `quorumHash`,
`proRegTx`) when sending `qgetdata` for better troubleshooting.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`GetProjectedMNPayees` wasn't projecting MN payees correctly.
## What was done?
HPMNs are now added 4 times before sorting the return list.
In addition, the case of last payee being HPMN and having still pending
payments is handled.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested on Masternodes / Next Payment tab on Qt client on Testnet.
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Added RPC `cleardiscouraged` which clears internally the list of
discouraged peers.
Note: Implementation of a `listdiscouraged` RPC is not possible because
the internal data structure used for discouraged peers is a Bloom
filter.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Currently, we store internally the nodes that already requested
`QGETDATA` for the same Quorum.
If data for the same Quorum is requested twice from the same `proRegTx`,
then the requester is P2P misbehaved.
## What was done?
Some data like `VerificationVector` and `EncryptedContributions` are not
instantly available.
This PR does not misbehave nodes for requesting data that weren't
available when asked.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
