3645e4ca0033bb6365f41ef710111780c139370f Add missing newline in util_ChainMerge test (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This was causing a lot of test cases not not be very meaningful because
multiple configuration options were combined into one line.
The changes in test output with this fix make sense and look like:
```diff
- testnet=1 regtest=1 || test
+ testnet=1 regtest=1 || error: Invalid combination of -regtest, -testnet and -chain. Can use at most one.
```
Issue was reported and debugged by
Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@protonmail.com> in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17385#issuecomment-550033222
<!--
*** Please remove the following help text before submitting: ***
Pull requests without a rationale and clear improvement may be closed
immediately.
-->
<!--
Please provide clear motivation for your patch and explain how it improves
Bitcoin Core user experience or Bitcoin Core developer experience
significantly:
* Any test improvements or new tests that improve coverage are always welcome.
* All other changes should have accompanying unit tests (see `src/test/`) or
functional tests (see `test/`). Contributors should note which tests cover
modified code. If no tests exist for a region of modified code, new tests
should accompany the change.
* Bug fixes are most welcome when they come with steps to reproduce or an
explanation of the potential issue as well as reasoning for the way the bug
was fixed.
* Features are welcome, but might be rejected due to design or scope issues.
If a feature is based on a lot of dependencies, contributors should first
consider building the system outside of Bitcoin Core, if possible.
* Refactoring changes are only accepted if they are required for a feature or
bug fix or otherwise improve developer experience significantly. For example,
most "code style" refactoring changes require a thorough explanation why they
are useful, what downsides they have and why they *significantly* improve
developer experience or avoid serious programming bugs. Note that code style
is often a subjective matter. Unless they are explicitly mentioned to be
preferred in the [developer notes](/doc/developer-notes.md), stylistic code
changes are usually rejected.
-->
<!--
Bitcoin Core has a thorough review process and even the most trivial change
needs to pass a lot of eyes and requires non-zero or even substantial time
effort to review. There is a huge lack of active reviewers on the project, so
patches often sit for a long time.
-->
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 3645e4ca0033bb6365f41ef710111780c139370f
practicalswift:
ACK 3645e4ca0033bb6365f41ef710111780c139370f -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: ca5bde9b9f553811d4827113f4880d15d7b8f4f1455b95bbf34c9a1512fdd53062f1a2133c50d9b54f94160a1ee77a54bc82681a5f3bf25d2b0d01f8a8e95165
4671fc3d9e669da8b8781f0cbefee43cb9acd527 Expand on wallet_balance.py comment from https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16766\#issuecomment-527563982 (Jeremy Rubin)
91f3073f08aff395dd813296bf99fd8ccc81bb27 Update release notes to mention changes to IsTrusted and impact on wallet (Jeremy Rubin)
8f174ef112199aa4e98d756039855cc561687c2e Systematize style of IsTrusted single line if (Jeremy Rubin)
b49dcbedf79613f0e0f61bfd742ed265213ed280 update variable naming conventions for IsTrusted (Jeremy Rubin)
5ffe0d144923f365cb1c2fad181eca15d1668692 Update comment in test/functional/wallet_balance.py (Jeremy Rubin)
a550c58267f50c59c2eea1d46edaa5019a8ad5d8 Update wallet_balance.py test to reflect new behavior (Jeremy Rubin)
5dd7da4ccd1354f09e2d00bab29288db0d5665d0 Reuse trustedParents in looped calls to IsTrusted (Jeremy Rubin)
595f09d6de7f1b94428cdd1310777aa6a4c584e5 Cache tx Trust per-call to avoid DoS (Jeremy Rubin)
dce032ce294fe0d531770f540b1de00dc1d13f4b Make IsTrusted scan parents recursively (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
This slightly modifies the behavior of IsTrusted to recursively check the parents of a transaction. Otherwise, it's possible that a parent is not IsTrusted but a child is. If a parent is not trusted, then a child should not be either.
This recursive scan can be a little expensive, so ~it might be beneficial to have a way of caching IsTrusted state, but this is a little complex because various conditions can change between calls to IsTrusted (e.g., re-org).~ I added a cache which works per call/across calls, but does not store the results semi-permanently. Which reduces DoS risk of this change. There is no risk of untrusted parents causing a resource exploitation, as we immediately return once that is detected.
This is a change that came up as a bug-fix esque change while working on OP_SECURETHEBAG. You can see the branch where this change is important here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/master...JeremyRubin:stb-with-rpc?expand=1. Essentially, without this change, we can be tricked into accepting an OP_SECURETHEBAG output because we don't properly check the parents. As this was a change which, on its own, was not dependent on OP_SECURETHEBAG, I broke it out as I felt the change stands on its own by fixing a long standing wallet bug.
The test wallet_balance.py has been corrected to meet the new behavior. The below comment, reproduced, explains what the issue is and the edge cases that can arise before this change.
# Before `test_balance()`, we have had two nodes with a balance of 50
# each and then we:
#
# 1) Sent 40 from node A to node B with fee 0.01
# 2) Sent 60 from node B to node A with fee 0.01
#
# Then we check the balances:
#
# 1) As is
# 2) With transaction 2 from above with 2x the fee
#
# Prior to #16766, in this situation, the node would immediately report
# a balance of 30 on node B as unconfirmed and trusted.
#
# After #16766, we show that balance as unconfirmed.
#
# The balance is indeed "trusted" and "confirmed" insofar as removing
# the mempool transactions would return at least that much money. But
# the algorithm after #16766 marks it as unconfirmed because the 'taint'
# tracking of transaction trust for summing balances doesn't consider
# which inputs belong to a user. In this case, the change output in
# question could be "destroyed" by replace the 1st transaction above.
#
# The post #16766 behavior is correct; we shouldn't be treating those
# funds as confirmed. If you want to rely on that specific UTXO existing
# which has given you that balance, you cannot, as a third party
# spending the other input would destroy that unconfirmed.
#
# For example, if the test transactions were:
#
# 1) Sent 40 from node A to node B with fee 0.01
# 2) Sent 10 from node B to node A with fee 0.01
#
# Then our node would report a confirmed balance of 40 + 50 - 10 = 80
# BTC, which is more than would be available if transaction 1 were
# replaced.
The release notes have been updated to note the new behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
Code Review ACK 4671fc3, maybe extend DoS protection in a follow-up PR.
fjahr:
Code review ACK 4671fc3d9e669da8b8781f0cbefee43cb9acd527
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 4671fc3d9e669da8b8781f0cbefee43cb9acd527. Changes since last review: 2 new commits adding suggested release note and python test comment, also a clean rebase with no changes to the earlier commits. The PR description is more comprehensive now, too. Looks good!
promag:
Code review ACK 4671fc3d9e669da8b8781f0cbefee43cb9acd527.
Tree-SHA512: 6b183ff425304fef49724290053514cb2770f4a2350dcb83660ef24af5c54f7c4c2c345b0f62bba60eb2d2f70625ee61a7fab76a7f491bb5a84be5c4cc86b92f
fac22fd36b2d9f55dada31cc0da55520431b972a log: Remove GetAdjustedTime from IBD header progress estimation (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is a "refactor" that shouldn't change behaviour, because the two times are most likely equal. A minimum of 5 outbound peers are needed to adjust the time. And if the time is adjusted, it will be by at most 70 minutes (`DEFAULT_MAX_TIME_ADJUSTMENT`). Thus, the progress estimate should differ by at most 7 blocks.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fac22fd36b2d9f55dada31cc0da55520431b972a
vincenzopalazzo:
ACK fac22fd36b
Tree-SHA512: bf9f5eef66db0110dd268cf6dbfab64b9c11ba776924f5b386ceae3f2d005272cceb87ebcc96e0c8b854c051514854a2a5af39ae43bad008fac685b5aafaabd0
2e42050b7fc61201f202438e8cd4383a06eb98d5 doc: fix undo data filename (s/undo???.dat/rev???.dat/) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This typo was discovered in the course of a review club to #20827, see https://bitcoincore.reviews/20827#l-31.
ACKs for top commit:
shaavan:
ACK 2e42050b7fc61201f202438e8cd4383a06eb98d5
Tree-SHA512: 0c7a00dce24c03bee6d37265d5b4bc97e976c3f3910af1113f967f6298940f892d6fb517f7b154f32ccedb365060314d4d78d5eb2a9c68b25f0859a628209cd3
fa37e798b2660d8e44e31c944a257b55aeef5de2 wallet: Replace confusing getAdjustedTime() with GetTime() (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Setting `nTimeReceived` to the adjusted time has several issues:
* `m_best_block_time` is set to the "unadjusted" time, thus a comparison of the two times is like comparing apples to oranges. In the worst case this opens up an attack vector where remote peers can force a premature re-broadcast of wallet txs.
* The RPC documentation for `"timereceived"` doesn't mention that the network adjusted time is used, possibly confusing users when the time reported by RPC is off by a few seconds compared to their local timestamp.
Fix all issues by replacing the call with `GetTime()`. Also a style fix: Use non-narrowing integer conversion in the RPC method.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa37e798b2660d8e44e31c944a257b55aeef5de2
shaavan:
crACK fa37e798b2660d8e44e31c944a257b55aeef5de2
Tree-SHA512: 8d020ba400521246b7aed4b6c41319fc70552e8c69e929a5994500375466a9edac02a0ae64b803dbc6695df22276489561a23bd6e030c44c97d288f7b9b2b3fa
a989f98d240a84b5c798252acaa4a316ac711189 refactor: net: subnet lookup: use single-result LookupHost() (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
plus describe single IP subnet case for more clarity
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
utACK a989f98d240a84b5c798252acaa4a316ac711189 the patch rebases cleanly to master, the debug build is green, and it is essentially the same patch as c8991f0251dd2a modulo local variable naming, braced initialization, and a comment
vasild:
ACK a989f98d240a84b5c798252acaa4a316ac711189
Tree-SHA512: 082d3481b1fa5e5f3267b7c4a812954b67b36d1f94c5296fe20110699f053e5042dfa13f728ae20249e9b8d71e930c3b119410125d0faeccdfbdc259223ee3a6
fa165e954579436fe4b636e4222d8ce0c1269786 Replace stoul with ToIntegral in dbwrapper (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The string is created with `%llu`. See: 7fcf53f7b4/src/leveldb/db/db_impl.cc (L1436-L1437)
So it seems odd to silently accept when parsing: whitespace, a sign character, trailing chars, overflow, ....
Fix that by using the stricter ToIntegral.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa165e954579436fe4b636e4222d8ce0c1269786
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa165e954579436fe4b636e4222d8ce0c1269786
theStack:
Code-review ACK fa165e954579436fe4b636e4222d8ce0c1269786
Tree-SHA512: b87f01431ca0b971ff84610022da8679d3c33470b88cfc3f4a337e6e176a0455715588aefd40e8e2bbe7459d902dc89d7bfe34e7fd66755f631cc18dc039fa2f
5b44a75493a1a098404d5e21dc384e74eae1892e refactor: Remove unused CExt{Pub,}Key (de)serialization methods (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
As pointed out in issue #17130, the serialization/deserialization methods for the classes `CExtKey` and
`CExtPubKey` are only used in the BIP32 unit tests and hence can be removed (see comments https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17130#issuecomment-543750290, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17130#issuecomment-543794408 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/17130#issuecomment-543814727).
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 5b44a75493a1a098404d5e21dc384e74eae1892e -- -60 LOC diff looks correct :)
promag:
ACK 5b44a75493a1a098404d5e21dc384e74eae1892e.
MarcoFalke:
unsigned ACK 5b44a75493a1a098404d5e21dc384e74eae1892e
fjahr:
ACK 5b44a75
jonatack:
Light ACK 5b44a75493a1a098404d5e21dc384e74eae1892e. Built, ran tests and bitcoind. `git blame` shows most of the last changes are from commit 90604f16af in 2015 to add bip32 pubkey serialization.
Tree-SHA512: 6887573b76b9e54e117a076557407b6f7908719b2202fb9eea498522baf9f30198b3f78b87a62efcd17ad1ab0886196f099239992ce7cbbaee79979ffe9e5f2c
73b96c94cb6c2afdee7f151768a96944ecaf9d9b net: Fix uninitialized read in ProcessMessage(...) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Fix an uninitialized read in `ProcessMessage(…, "tx", …)` when receiving a transaction we already have.
The uninitialized value is read and used on [L2526 in the case of `AlreadyHave(inv) == true`](d8a66626d6/src/net_processing.cpp (L2494-L2526)).
Proof of concept being run against a `bitcoind` built with MemorySanitizer (`-fsanitize=memory`):
```
$ ./p2p-uninit-read-in-conditional-poc.py
Usage: ./p2p-uninit-read-in-conditional-poc.py <dstaddr> <dstport> <net>
$ bitcoind -regtest &
$ ./p2p-uninit-read-in-conditional-poc.py 127.0.0.1 18444 regtest
SUMMARY: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value
[1]+ Exit 77 bitcoind -regtest
$
```
Proof of concept being run against a `bitcoind` running under Valgrind (`valgrind --exit-on-first-error`):
```
$ valgrind -q --exit-on-first-error=yes --error-exitcode=1 bitcoind -regtest &
$ ./p2p-uninit-read-in-conditional-poc.py 127.0.0.1 18444 regtest
==27351== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
[1]+ Exit 1 valgrind -q --exit-on-first-error=yes --error-exitcode=1 bitcoind -regtest
$
```
Proof of concept script:
```
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import sys
from test_framework.mininode import NetworkThread
from test_framework.mininode import P2PDataStore
from test_framework.messages import CTransaction, CTxIn, CTxOut, msg_tx
def send_duplicate_tx(dstaddr="127.0.0.1", dstport=18444, net="regtest"):
network_thread = NetworkThread()
network_thread.start()
node = P2PDataStore()
node.peer_connect(dstaddr=dstaddr, dstport=dstport, net=net)()
node.wait_for_verack()
tx = CTransaction()
tx.vin.append(CTxIn())
tx.vout.append(CTxOut())
node.send_message(msg_tx(tx))
node.send_message(msg_tx(tx))
node.peer_disconnect()
network_thread.close()
if __name__ == "__main__":
if len(sys.argv) != 4:
print("Usage: {} <dstaddr> <dstport> <net>".format(sys.argv[0]))
sys.exit(0)
send_duplicate_tx(sys.argv[1], int(sys.argv[2]), sys.argv[3])
```
Note that the transaction in the proof of concept is the simplest possible, but really any transaction can be used. It does not have to be a valid transaction.
This bug was introduced in #15921 ("validation: Tidy up ValidationState interface") which was merged in to `master` 28 days ago.
Luckily this bug was caught before being part of any Bitcoin Core release :)
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 73b96c94cb6c2afdee7f151768a96944ecaf9d9b
laanwj:
ACK 73b96c94cb6c2afdee7f151768a96944ecaf9d9b, thanks for discovering and reporting this before it ended up in a release.
Tree-SHA512: 7ce6b8f260bcdd9b2ec4ff4b941a891bbef578acf4456df33b7a8d42b248237ec4949e65e2445b24851d1639b10681c701ad500b1c0b776ff050ef8c3812c795
3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf [validation] Remove fMissingInputs from AcceptToMemoryPool() (John Newbery)
c428622a5bb1e37b2e6ab2c52791ac05d9271238 [validation] Remove unused first_invalid parameter from ProcessNewBlockHeaders() (John Newbery)
7204c6434b944f6ad51b3c895837729d3aa56eea [validation] Remove useless ret parameter from Invalid() (John Newbery)
1a37de4b3174d19a6d8691ae07e92b32fdfaef11 [validation] Remove error() calls from Invalid() calls (John Newbery)
067981e49246822421a7bcc720491427e1dba8a3 [validation] Tidy Up ValidationResult class (John Newbery)
a27a2957ed9afbe5a96caa5f0f4cbec730d27460 [validation] Add CValidationState subclasses (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Carries out some remaining tidy-ups remaining after PR 15141:
- split ValidationState into TxValidationState and BlockValidationState (commit from ajtowns)
- various minor code style tidy-ups to the ValidationState class
- remove the useless `ret` parameter from `ValidationState::Invalid()`
- remove the now unused `first_invalid` parameter from `ProcessNewBlockHeaders()`
- remove the `fMissingInputs` parameter from `AcceptToMemoryPool()`, and deal with missing inputs the same way as other errors by using the `TxValidationState` object.
Tip for reviewers (thanks ryanofsky!): The first commit ("[validation] Add CValidationState subclasses" ) is huge and can be easier to start reviewing if you revert the rote, mechanical changes:
Substitute the commit hash of commit "[validation] Add CValidationState subclasses" for <CommitHash> in the commands below.
```sh
git checkout <CommitHash>
git grep -l ValidationState | xargs sed -i 's/BlockValidationState\|TxValidationState/CValidationState/g'
git grep -l ValidationResult | xargs sed -i 's/BlockValidationResult\|TxValidationResult/ValidationInvalidReason/g'
git grep -l MaybePunish | xargs sed -i 's/MaybePunishNode\(ForBlock\|ForTx\)/MaybePunishNode/g'
git diff HEAD^
```
After that it's possible to easily see the mechanical changes with:
```sh
git log -p -n1 -U0 --word-diff-regex=. <CommitHash>
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf. Also built & ran tests locally.
fjahr:
Code review ACK 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf . Only nit style change and pure virtual destructor added since my last review.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 3004d5a12d09d94bfc4dee2a8e8f2291996a4aaf. Just whitespace change and pure virtual destructor added since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 511de1fb380a18bec1944ea82b513b6192df632ee08bb16344a2df3c40811a88f3872f04df24bc93a41643c96c48f376a04551840fd804a961490d6c702c3d36
9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82 [docs] Add release notes for removal of REJECT reasons (John Newbery)
04a2f326ec0f06fb4fce1c4f93500752f05dede8 [validation] Fix REJECT message comments (John Newbery)
e9d5a59e34ff2d538d8f5315efd9908bf24d0fdc [validation] Remove REJECT code from CValidationState (John Newbery)
0053e16714323c1694c834fdca74f064a1a33529 [logging] Don't log REJECT code when transaction is rejected (John Newbery)
a1a07cfe99fc8cee30ba5976dc36b47b1f6532ab [validation] Fix peer punishment for bad blocks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
We no longer send BIP 61 REJECT messages, so there's no need to set
a REJECT code in the CValidationState object.
Note that there is a minor bug fix in p2p behaviour here. Because the
call to `MaybePunishNode()` in `PeerLogicValidation::BlockChecked()` only
previously happened if the REJECT code was > 0 and < `REJECT_INTERNAL`,
then there are cases were `MaybePunishNode()` can get called where it
wasn't previously:
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `CACHED_INVALID`.
- when `AcceptBlockHeader()` fails with `BLOCK_MISSING_PREV`.
Note that `BlockChecked()` cannot fail with an 'internal' reject code. The
only internal reject code was `REJECT_HIGHFEE`, which was only set in
ATMP.
This reverts a minor bug introduced in 5d08c9c579.
ACKs for top commit:
ariard:
ACK 9075d13, changes since last reviewed are splitting them in separate commits to ease understanding and fix nits
fjahr:
ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82, confirmed diff to last review was fixing nits in docs/comments.
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9075d13153ce06cd59a45644831ecc43126e1e82. Only changes since last review are splitting the main commit and updating comments
Tree-SHA512: 58e8a1a4d4e6f156da5d29fb6ad6a62fc9c594bbfc6432b3252e962d0e9e10149bf3035185dc5320c46c09f3e49662bc2973ec759679c0f3412232087cb8a3a7
cd68594dcdadc195bd2ea9394fa04edfdbdf1149 Only check the hash of transactions loaded from disk (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
It feels unnecessary to do a full `CheckTransaction` for every transaction saved in the wallet. It should not be possible for an invalid transaction to get into the wallet in the first place, and if there is any disk corruption, the hash check will catch it.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK cd68594dcdadc195bd2ea9394fa04edfdbdf1149
laanwj:
ACK cd68594dcdadc195bd2ea9394fa04edfdbdf1149
promag:
ACK cd68594dcdadc195bd2ea9394fa04edfdbdf1149, AFAICT the check is not needed, hash comparison gives data integrity.
Tree-SHA512: 5b2e719f76097cfbf125392db6cc6c764355c81f0b7a5b60aee4b06af1afcca80cfd38a3cf5307fd9e2c1afc405f8321929a4552943099a8161e6762965451fb
57e2edea0bfea664e3f12dad2508139eb7f461bc Send amount shows minimum amount placeholder (JeremyCrookshank)
Pull request description:
Noticed that there wasn't a default value for the send amount. However if you put a value in or click the up and down arrows you're unable to get it blank again, so it makes sense that it has a default value. I hope this also makes it more clear that users can send less than 1 BTC if it shows the 8 decimal places
PR:
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 57e2edea0bfea664e3f12dad2508139eb7f461bc.
GChuf:
ACK 57e2edea0bfea664e3f12dad2508139eb7f461bc
laanwj:
ACK 57e2edea0bfea664e3f12dad2508139eb7f461bc, this is a surprisingly compact solution too
Tree-SHA512: 354590d2a88231b8649f7ae985c8a7864d74ca0e1f8603cb1730ba46747084de90ee6285ce4d39ee04b054fb9cd2d78ebc71146f3af694c37a8a3aff7f051800
7d8d3e6a2ad827fa916e3909a18dedb9f7fdce43 Add tests for util/vector.h's Cat and Vector (Pieter Wuille)
e65e61c812df90a56e3ce4a8e76c4b746766f387 Add some general std::vector utility functions (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is another general improvement extracted from #16800 .
Two functions are added are:
* Vector(arg1,arg2,arg3,...) constructs a vector with the specified arguments as elements. The vector's type is derived from the arguments. If some of the arguments are rvalue references, they will be moved into place rather than copied (which can't be achieved using list initialization).
* Cat(vector1,vector2) returns a concatenation of the two vectors, efficiently moving elements when relevant.
Vector generalizes (and replaces) the `Singleton` function in src/descriptor.cpp, and `Cat` replaces the function in bech32.cpp
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7d8d3e6a2ad827fa916e3909a18dedb9f7fdce43
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7d8d3e6a2ad827fa916e3909a18dedb9f7fdce43 (enjoyed reading the tests, but did not compile)
Tree-SHA512: 92325f14e90d7e7d9d920421979aec22bb0d730e0291362b4326cccc76f9c2d865bec33a797c5c0201773468c3773cb50ce52c8eee4c1ec1a4d10db5cf2b9d2a
ea4cc3a7b36a9c77dbf0aff439da3ef0ea58e6e4 Truly decouple wallet from chainparams for -fallbackfee (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
Before it was 0 by default for main and 20000 for test and regtest.
Now it is 0 by default for all chains, thus there's no need to call Params().
Also now the default for main is properly documented.
Suggestion for release notes:
-fallbackfee was 0 (disabled) by default for the main chain, but 20000 by default for the test chains. Now it is 0 by default for all chains. Testnet and regtest users will have to add fallbackfee=20000 to their configuration if they weren't setting it and they want it to keep working like before.
Should I propose them to the wiki for the release notes or only after merge?
For more context, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16402#issuecomment-515701042
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK ea4cc3a7b36a9c77dbf0aff439da3ef0ea58e6e4
Tree-SHA512: fdfaba5d813da4221e405e0988bef44f3856d10f897a94f9614386d14b7716f4326ab8a6646e26d41ef3f4fa61b936191e216b1b605e9ab0520b0657fc162e6c
----
Co-Authored-By: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
eb7b78165966f2c79da71b993c4c4d793e37297f modify p2p_feefilter test to catch rounding error (Gregory Sanders)
6a51f7951716d6d6fc0f9b56028f3a0dd02b61c8 Disallow implicit conversion for CFeeRate constructor (Gregory Sanders)
8e59af55aaf1b196575084bce2448af02d97d745 feefilter: Compute the absolute fee rather than stored rate to match mempool acceptance logic (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
This means we will use the rounding-down behavior in `GetFee` to match both mempool acceptance and wallet logic, with minimal changes.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16499
Replacement PR for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16500
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK eb7b78165966f2c79da71b993c4c4d793e37297f code review only
naumenkogs:
utACK eb7b78165966f2c79da71b993c4c4d793e37297f
achow101:
re ACK eb7b78165966f2c79da71b993c4c4d793e37297f
promag:
ACK eb7b78165966f2c79da71b993c4c4d793e37297f.
Tree-SHA512: 484a11c8f0e825f0c983b1f7e71cf6252b1bba6858194abfe4c088da3bae8a418ec539ef6c4181bf30940e277a95c08d493595d59dfcc6ddf77c65b05563dd7e
5c5d0b62648e1b144b7b93c199f45265dac100e5 Add FoundBlock.found member (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change lets IPC serialization code handle FoundBlock arguments more simply and efficiently. Without this change there was no way to determine from a FoundBlock object whether a block was found or not. So in order to correctly implement behavior of leaving FoundBlock output variables unmodified when a block was not found, IPC code would have to read preexisting output variable values from the local process, send them to the remote process, receive output values back from the remote process, and save them to output variables unconditionally. With FoundBlock.found method, the process is simpler. There's no need to read or send preexisting local output variable values, just to read final output values from the remote process and set them conditionally if the block was found.
---
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10). The commit was first part of larger PR #10102.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
Code review ACK 5c5d0b62648e1b144b7b93c199f45265dac100e5
theStack:
Concept and code review ACK 5c5d0b62648e1b144b7b93c199f45265dac100e5
jamesob:
ACK 5c5d0b62648e1b144b7b93c199f45265dac100e5 ([`jamesob/ackr/22215.1.ryanofsky.refactor_add_foundblock`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/22215.1.ryanofsky.refactor_add_foundblock))
Zero-1729:
crACK 5c5d0b6
Tree-SHA512: d906e1b7100ff72c3aa06d80bd77673887b2db670ebd52dce7c4f6f557a23a1744c6109308228a37fda6c6ea74f05ba0efecff0ef235ab06ea8acd861fbb8675
faa86b71acefc8f2e366746a1c251888e6e686dd fuzz: Use ConsumeUInt256 helper to simplify rolling_bloom_filter fuzz test (MarcoFalke)
aaaa61fd306e25379e6222e31bf160a6eb04f74e fuzz: Speed up rolling_bloom_filter fuzz test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without a size limit on the input data, the runtime is unbounded. Fix this by picking an upper bound on the maximum number of fuzz operations.
Reproducer from OSS-Fuzz (without bug report):
[clusterfuzz-testcase-rolling_bloom_filter-5980807721254912.log](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/files/6822159/clusterfuzz-testcase-rolling_bloom_filter-5980807721254912.log)
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faa86b71acefc8f2e366746a1c251888e6e686dd
theStack:
Concept and code review ACK faa86b71acefc8f2e366746a1c251888e6e686dd
Tree-SHA512: eace588509dfddb2ba97baf86379fa713fa6eb758184abff676cb95807ff8ff36905eeaddeba05665b8464c35c57e2138f88caec71cbfb255e546bbe76558da0
faafda232e1d4f79ee64dbfee699a8018f25b0bc fuzz: Speed up prevector fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Without a size limit on the input data, the runtime is unbounded. Fix this by picking an upper bound on the maximum number of fuzz operations.
Should fix https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35981
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faafda232e1d4f79ee64dbfee699a8018f25b0bc
Tree-SHA512: 1bf166c4a99a8ce88bdc030cd6a32ce1da5251b73873772e0e9c001ec2bacafebb183f7c8c88806d0ab633aada2cff8b78791f5c9c0c6f2cc8ef5f0875c4b2ef
aaaa9c6019790a1a21a7b4ef01693ac9390ae6d0 fuzz: Extend addrman fuzz test with deserialize (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Requested on IRC:
```
[18:01] <vasild> => I think there is a good chance fuzzing addrman unserialize will find more bugs
[18:04] <sipa> definitely
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK aaaa9c6019790a1a21a7b4ef01693ac9390ae6d0 per `git diff fa74025 aaaa9c6`
vasild:
ACK aaaa9c6019790a1a21a7b4ef01693ac9390ae6d0
Tree-SHA512: f57d0aecf22a933e48d3181d7398218949588dd0de31218d1d28c825649e55fd60b0de6fbc92d2497cf5639a4adc2061c9bf8216546a2be916feac4f03f16e8f
fb7be92b094477131140b58a4e3ae98366b93e76 Mark print-% target as phony. (Dmitry Goncharov)
Pull request description:
.PHONY does not take patterns (such as print-%) as prerequisites.
Have print-% depend on force and mark force as phony.
This change ensures print-% rule works even when there is a file that matches the target.
```
$ # on master
$ make print-host
host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
$ touch print-host
$ make print-host
make: 'print-host' is up to date.
$
$ git co mark_print_as_phony
Switched to branch 'mark_print_as_phony'
$ make print-host
host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
$ touch force
$ make print-host
host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK fb7be92b094477131140b58a4e3ae98366b93e76, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (x86_64).
Tree-SHA512: b89ae66aa8c7aa6a7ab5f0956f9eb3b3ef9d56994b60dc2a97d498d4c1bba537845c190723e8a10310280b1b35df2cd935cc30aeb76735cac2dc621ad7823772
906d7913117c8f10934b37afa27ae8ac565da042 fuzz: add missing ECCVerifyHandle to base_encode_decode (Andrew Poelstra)
Pull request description:
It is possible to trigger a fuzztest failure in the `base_encode_decode` by asking it to decode any PSBT that has HD keypaths in it. For example, this one
```
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
```
which I took straight from the PSBT test vectors. The reason is that in src/psbt.h we call `DeserializeHDKeypaths`, which in turn calls `CPubKey::IsFullyValid`, which in turn asserts that a secp context has been created.
The error appears to be masked on many systems by the definition of `instance_of_eccryptoclosure` in src/script/bitcoinconsensus.cpp, which defines a static object which contains an `ECCVerifyHandle`. If you just comment out that line you can reliably trigger the fuzz test failure, e.g. by creating a file `crash` with the above PSBT, and runnnig
```
ASAN_OPTIONS=symbolize=0:detect_stack_use_after_return=1:check_initialization_order=1:strict_init_order=1 UBSAN_OPTIONS=suppressions=./test/sanitizer_suppressions/ubsan:print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=1:report_error_type=1 FUZZ=base_encode_decode ./src/test/fuzz/fuzz -seed_inputs=crash
```
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 906d7913117c8f10934b37afa27ae8ac565da042
Tree-SHA512: b98b60573c21efe28503fe351883c6f0d9ac99d0dd6f100537b16ac53476617b8a3f899faf0c23d893d34a01b3bbe4a784499ec6f9c7000292e850bed449bd85
9550dffa0c61df6d1591c62d09629b4c5731e1b7 fuzz: Assert roundtrip equality for `CPubKey` (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR is a (quite late) follow-up to #19237 (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19237#issuecomment-642203251). Looking at `CPubKey::Serialize` and `CPubKey::Unserialize` I can't think of a scenario where the roundtrip (serialization/deserialization) equality wouldn't hold.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
crACK 9550dffa0c pending CI
Tree-SHA512: 640fb9e777d249769b22ee52c0b15a68ff0645b16c986e1c0bce9742155d14f1be601e591833e1dc8dcffebf271966c6b861b90888a44aae1feae2e0248e2c55
fa483e9f68b8b4171dabb25cc88dc2eada454a99 fuzz: Speed up crypto fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
May fix https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34962
Similar solution to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22005
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa483e9f68b8b4171dabb25cc88dc2eada454a99: patch looks correct and rationale makes sense
Tree-SHA512: 3788cf9f6ba0f7a0a217cd3a6a825839689425e99e4d6d657981d291a001b0da7c5abb50a68b4ee1c2a8300b87fb92e4e3ccc1171907792b40251e467c33bd53
d44a261acff40c1c8727d3cc0106bde65a6416d0 Fix issues when `walletdir` is root directory (unknown)
Pull request description:
+ Remove one character less from wallet path
+ After testing lot of random strings with special chars in `wallet_name`, I found that the issue was not related to special characters in the name. Reviewing PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21907 helped me resolve the issue.
**Real issue**: If the path mentioned in `walletdir` is a root directory, first character of the wallet name or path is removed
**Solution**: `if` statement to check `walletdir` is a root directory
Fixes: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21510https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21501
Related PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/20080
Consider the wallet directories `w1` and `w2` saved in `D:\`. Run `bitcoind.exe -walletdir=D:\`, Results for `bitcoin-cli.exe listwalletdir`:
Before this PR:
```
{
"wallets": [
{
"name": "1"
},
{
"name": "2"
}
]
}
```
After this PR:
```
"wallets": [
{
"name": "w1"
},
{
"name": "w2"
}
]
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK d44a261acff40c1c8727d3cc0106bde65a6416d0
meshcollider:
utACK d44a261acff40c1c8727d3cc0106bde65a6416d0
Tree-SHA512: b09b00f727407e3771c8694861dae1bfd29d97a0d51ddcb5d9c0111dc618b3fff2f75829cbb4361c54457ee564e94fcefd9e2928262a1c918a2b6bbad724eb55
1be6267ce1ee142c3b90baed1925a82eab6514aa fuzz: don't try and use fopencookie when building for Android (fanquake)
Pull request description:
When building for Android, `_GNU_SOURCE` will be defined:
```bash
/home/ubuntu/android-sdk/ndk/22.1.7171670/toolchains/llvm/prebuilt/linux-x86_64/bin/aarch64-linux-android30-clang++ -dM -E -x c++ - < /dev/null
#define _GNU_SOURCE 1
#define _LP64 1
#define __AARCH64EL__ 1
#define __AARCH64_CMODEL_SMALL__ 1
#define __ANDROID_API__ 30
#define __ANDROID__ 1
#define __ARM_64BIT_STATE 1
.....
```
but it doesn't have the [`fopencookie()` function](https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Streams-and-Cookies.html), or define the `cookie_io_functions_t` type, which results in compile failures:
```bash
In file included from test/fuzz/addition_overflow.cpp:7:
./test/fuzz/util.h:388:15: error: unknown type name 'cookie_io_functions_t'
const cookie_io_functions_t io_hooks = {
^
15 warnings and 1 error generated.
```
Just skip trying to use it if we are building for Android. Should fix#22062.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1be6267ce1ee142c3b90baed1925a82eab6514aa
Tree-SHA512: d62f63d0624af04b76c7e07b0332c71eca2bf9cd9e096a60aea9e212b7bbc1548e9fa9a76d065ec719bb345fe8726619c3bd2d0631f54d877c82972b7b289321
5e146022daa4336de94447e5b8e5418296286927 wallet: fix scanning progress calculation for single block range (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
If the blockchain is rescanned for a single block (i.e. start and stop hashes are equal, and with that also the estimated start/stop verification progress values) the progress calculation could lead to a NaN value caused by a division by zero (0.0/0.0), resulting in an invalid JSON result for the `getwalletinfo` RPC. This PR fixes this behaviour by setting the progress to zero in that special case. Fixes#20297.
The behaviour can easily be reproduced by continuously running single block rescans in an endless loop, e.g. via
```bash
#!/bin/bash
while true
do
bitcoin-cli rescanblockchain $(bitcoin-cli getblockcount)
done
```
and at the same time perform some `getwalletinfo` RPCs.
On the master branch, this leads to frequent invalid responses (tested on mainchain):
```
$ bitcoin-cli getwalletinfo
error: couldn't parse reply from server
$ curl --user `cat ~/.bitcoin/.cookie` --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id": "curltest", "method": "getwalletinfo", "params": []}' -H 'content-type: text/plain;' http://127.0.0.1:8332/
{"result":{"walletname":"","walletversion":169900,"format":"bdb","balance":0.00000000,"unconfirmed_balance":0.00000000,"immature_balance":0.00000000,"txcount":0,"keypoololdest":1603677276,"keypoolsize":1000,"hdseedid":"3196e33ecb47c7130e6ca60f2f895f9259860dca","keypoolsize_hd_internal":1000,"paytxfee":0.00000000,"private_keys_enabled":true,"avoid_reuse":false,"scanning":{"duration":0,"progress":},"descriptors":false},"error":null,"id":"curltest"}
```
(note that missing value for "progress" in the JSON result).
On the PR branch, the behaviour doesn't occur anymore.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 5e146022daa4336de94447e5b8e5418296286927
promag:
Core review ACK 5e146022daa4336de94447e5b8e5418296286927.
Tree-SHA512: f0e6aad5a6cd08b36c5fe820fff0ef26663229b39169a4dbe757f3c795a41cf5c69c9dc90efe7515675ae1059307f8971123781a0514d10704123a6f28b125ab
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Bad coding in governance code
## What was done?
Use Enums where possible
## How Has This Been Tested?
Make check
## Breaking Changes
none
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Upgraded version of cppcheck
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
Ran cppcheck
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Develop doesn't build: ./autogen.sh fails
## What was done?
remove newline
## How Has This Been Tested?
./autogen.sh
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Converts some CCriticalSections with Mutexes; other minor refactoring
in
0fce09d1f0
see before
<img width="771" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6443210/225969163-bb4cee62-3e6a-4224-980a-11b2e0024a60.png">
and after
<img width="766" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6443210/225969245-e8afcbf6-c112-40c4-9504-82830b005a53.png">
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
fa18553d382a7d8c447cd6698b36e293fb7ecf1f fuzz: Remove addrdb fuzz target (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The target has several issues:
* It is named incorrectly (`addrdb`, but it constructs a `CBanEntry`)
* It doesn't do anything meaningful, other than consuming one integer and passing it to a constructor
* It consumes CPU time that can be used for the other targets
* It is redundant with the banman fuzz target
Fix all by removing it.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
ACK fa18553d382a7d8c447cd6698b36e293fb7ecf1f, thanks for the cleanup
Tree-SHA512: 3f8944d3f80913bf466c03062fed070e96073fb72d0938b2bc9a2586960c86879d6f251e16fd81cfeb4e6685ff9eef6bccb25cd3901b218a100c90f25a3c9240
14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee [consensus] MOVEONLY: Move single-sig checking EvalScript code to EvalChecksig (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is another small refactor pulled out of the Schnorr/Taproot PR #17977.
This is in preparation for adding different signature verification rules,
specifically tapscript (BIP 342), which interprets opcode 0xac and 0xad
as Schnorr signature verifications.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee, verified move-only.
MarcoFalke:
ACK 14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee, reviewed with "git show 14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee --color-moved=dimmed-zebra --color-moved-ws=ignore-all-space -W" 👆
fjahr:
Code-review ACK 14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee, verified that it's move-only.
instagibbs:
code review ACK 14e8cf974a, verified move-only
theStack:
Code-Review ACK 14e8cf974a
jonatack:
ACK 14e8cf974a7a317796ef8e97e5cf9c355ceff0ee
Tree-SHA512: af2efce9ae39d5ec01db5b9ef0ff383fe252ef5f33b3483927308ae17d91a619266cb45951f32ea1ce54807a4c0f052bcdefb47e244465d3a726393221c227b1
13076867981ab36b3549ab4c29583ae8ed12a709 refactor: Use Mutex type for g_cs_recent_confirmed_transactions (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
No need the `RecursiveMutex` type for the `g_cs_recent_confirmed_transactions`.
Related to #19303.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 13076867981ab36b3549ab4c29583ae8ed12a709
vasild:
ACK 13076867
Tree-SHA512: 67f1be10c80ec18d0f80b9f5036e5a20986314da9b9364ef4e193ad1d9f3f4c8e4c2e16253ca79d649ff602d5b8c2aff58d7dd1085841afb760479a4875cffbe
37ae687f95c82f2d64ed880533d158060d4fc3de Add tests for CPubKey serialization/unserialization (Elichai Turkel)
9b8907faded8e4ec312c0dd4b4b15e1793876acd Check size after Unserializing CPubKey (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
Found by practicalswift, closes#19235
Currently all the public API(except the pointer-like API) in CPubKey that sets/constructs a pubkey goes through `CPubKey::Set` which checks if that the length and size match and if not invalidates the key.
This adds the same check to `CPubKey::Unserialize`, sadly I don't see an easy way to just push this to the existing checks in `CPubKey::Set` but it's only a simple condition.
The problem with not invalidating is that if you write a pubkey like: `{0x02,0x00}` it will think the actual length is 33(because of `size()`) and will access uninitialized memory if you call any of the functions on CPubKey.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
re-ACK 37ae687f95c82f2d64ed880533d158060d4fc3de
jonatack:
Code review re-ACK 37ae687 per `git diff eab8ee3 37ae687` only change since last review at eab8ee3 is passing the `pubkey` param by reference to const instead of by value in `src/test/key_tests.cpp::CmpSerializationPubkey`
MarcoFalke:
ACK 37ae687f95c82f2d64ed880533d158060d4fc3de
Tree-SHA512: 30173755555dfc76d6263fb6a59f41be36049ffae7b4e1b92b922d668f5e5e2331f7374d5fa10d5d59fc53020d2966156905ffcfa8b8129c1f6d0ca062174ff1
29c9e2c2d2015ade47ed4497926363dea3f9c59b wallet: Do not iterate a directory if having an error while accessing it (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
On Windows when `ListDatabases` tries to iterate any system folder, e.g., "System Volume Information", it falls into an infinite loop.
This PR fixes this bug. Now the `debug.log` contains:
```
2021-05-12T09:07:53Z ListDatabases: Access is denied D:/System Volume Information -- skipping.
```
An easy way to reproduce the bug and test this PR is to pass the `-walletdir=D:\` command-line option, and run the `listwalletdir` RPC, or File -> Open Wallet in the GUI menu.
Fixes#20081.
Fixes#21136.
Fixes#21904.
Also https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/99243/listwalletdir-access-is-denied-d-system-volume-information
ACKs for top commit:
prayank23:
ACK 29c9e2c2d2
promag:
Code review ACK 29c9e2c2d2015ade47ed4497926363dea3f9c59b.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 29c9e2c2d2015ade47ed4497926363dea3f9c59b
Tree-SHA512: b851c88e6d09626f4cb81acc2fa59a563b2aee64582963285715bf785c64b872e8bf738aa6b27bdbaf4c3e5c8565c2dc2c802135f9aa1f48b4b913435bc5d793
9c891b64ffd14bc8216dbd5eb60816043af265b6 net: initialize nMessageSize to max uint32_t instead of -1 (eugene)
Pull request description:
nMessageSize is uint32_t and is set to -1. This will warn with `-fsanitize=implicit-integer-sign-change` when V1TransportDeserializer calls into the ctor. This pull initializes nMessageSize to `numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max()` instead and removes the ubsan suppression.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 9c891b64ffd14bc8216dbd5eb60816043af265b6
promag:
Code review ACK 9c891b64ffd14bc8216dbd5eb60816043af265b6.
Tree-SHA512: f05173d9553a01d207a5a7f8ff113d9e11354c50b494a67d44d3931c151581599a9da4e28f40edd113f4698ea9115e6092b2a5b7329c841426726772076c1493
fa95555a491dc01952703f476836e607ac34eab4 fuzz: Limit max insertions in timedata fuzz test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is debatable whether a size of the median filter other than `200` (the only size used in production) should be fuzzed. For now add a minimal patch to cap the max insertions. Otherwise the complexity is N^2 log(N), where N is the size of the fuzz input.
Hopefully fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34167
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa95555a491dc01952703f476836e607ac34eab4: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: be7737e9f4c906053e355641de84dde31fed37ed6be4c5e92e602ca7675dffdaf06b7063b9235ef541b05d3d5fd689c99479317473bb15cb5271b8baabffd0f2
facfc0f65dd0a7d54c0f6d56bff793e57b12ee12 fuzz: Remove strprintf test cases that are known to fail (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
They are still waiting to be fixed (see https://github.com/c42f/tinyformat/issues/70 ), so no need for us to carry them around in our source code. They can be added back once upstream is fixed.
Hopefully fixes https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34082
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK facfc0f65dd0a7d54c0f6d56bff793e57b12ee12
Tree-SHA512: d9d3d35555b6d58740a041ae45797ca85149f60990e2ed632c5dadf363e1d2362d2447681d7ceaa1fbffcd6e7bc8da5bc15d3923b68829a86c25b364a599afc8
83a425d25af033086744c1c8c892015014ed46bd compressor: use a prevector in compressed script serialization (William Casarin)
Pull request description:
This function was doing millions of unnecessary heap allocations during IBD.
I'm start to catalog unnecessary heap allocations as a pet project of mine: as-zero-as-possible-alloc IBD. This is one small step.
before:
after:
~should I type alias this?~ *I type aliased it*
This is a part of the Zero Allocations Project #18849 (ZAP1). This code came up as a place where many allocations occur.
ACKs for top commit:
Empact:
ACK 83a425d25a
elichai:
tACK 83a425d25af033086744c1c8c892015014ed46bd
sipa:
utACK 83a425d25af033086744c1c8c892015014ed46bd
Tree-SHA512: f0ffa6ab0ea1632715b0b76362753f9f6935f05cdcc80d85566774401155a3c57ad45a687942a1806d3503858f0bb698da9243746c8e2edb8fdf13611235b0e0
804ac106313eb52d3a86f42c681b42acf90974c8 remove unnecessary newline from initWarning() argument (Larry Ruane)
Pull request description:
Run: `src/bitcoind -wallet=nosuchfile`
Without this patch, `debug.log` contains:
```
2021-03-23T21:19:16Z init message: Verifying wallet(s)...
2021-03-23T21:19:16Z Warning: Skipping -wallet path that doesn't exist. Failed to load database path '/home/larry/.bitcoin/wallets/nosuchfile'. Path does not exist.
2021-03-23T21:19:16Z init message: Loading banlist...
```
With this patch, the empty line isn't present. This PR fixes a similar problem with `src/bitcoind -conf=nosuchfile`
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 804ac106313eb52d3a86f42c681b42acf90974c8: patch looks correct!
jarolrod:
tACK 804ac106313eb52d3a86f42c681b42acf90974c8, nice catch!
theStack:
Code-review ACK 804ac106313eb52d3a86f42c681b42acf90974c8
Tree-SHA512: dfcbaaa72ca24ac40233ac56840cfba8827853711d3df6e229ce940686f2ebf8bf0560bafcaa73a4d82d179a5050af0d3cabdc47b3b1dfd6aaadf718a6635f11
5294f0d5a94cc7beaf692131fba0cad8beec9f13 refactor: return std::nullopt instead of {} (fanquake)
Pull request description:
In #21415 [we decided](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21415#issuecomment-800236640) to return `std::optional` rather than `{}` for
uninitialized values. This PR replaces the two remaining usages of `{}`
with `std::nullopt`.
As a side-effect, this also quells the spurious GCC 10.2.x warning that
we've had reported quite a few times. i.e #21318, #21248, #20797.
```bash
txmempool.cpp: In member function ‘CTxMemPool::setEntries CTxMemPool::GetIterSet(const std::set<uint256>&) const’:
txmempool.cpp:898:13: warning: ‘<anonymous>’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
898 | return {};
| ^
```
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 5294f0d5a94cc7beaf692131fba0cad8beec9f13, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 5b776be79ab26e5a3a5fc2b463b394ea5ce6797ed5558424873fa4ecee2898170eff76d6da9d69394d28f8f98974117fc63b922a3e19c52f5294c83073e79bb0
3d086f42ab58f0f5984101d5285d5a707e3dc8e7 test: add ParseUInt16() test coverage (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
`ParseUInt16()` was just added in #21328.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 3d086f42ab58f0f5984101d5285d5a707e3dc8e7: patch looks correct & more coverage is better than less coverage
Tree-SHA512: bf7f96deb7c1531419565907f0ea8a8e32b368d4b823a3e80928b2c118edbf643ea06e357b4b5504a89f855caeed289daa9f823c740231ed6ad1b8ed00285ce8
8dd5946c0b7aa8f3976b14a5de4ce84b80a9c32a add functional test (Larry Ruane)
b5a80fa7e487c37b7ac0e3874a2fabade41b9ca8 util: Handle HTTP_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE in bitcoin-cli (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
If `bitcoind` is processing 16 RPC requests, attempting to submit another request using `bitcoin-cli` produces this less-than-helpful error message: `error: couldn't parse reply from server`. This PR changes the error to: `error: server response: Work queue depth exceeded`.
ACKs for top commit:
fjahr:
tACK 8dd5946c0b7aa8f3976b14a5de4ce84b80a9c32a
luke-jr:
utACK 8dd5946c0b7aa8f3976b14a5de4ce84b80a9c32a (no changes since previous utACK)
hebasto:
re-ACK 8dd5946c0b7aa8f3976b14a5de4ce84b80a9c32a, only suggested changes since my [previous](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18335#pullrequestreview-460621350) review.
darosior:
ACK 8dd5946c0b7aa8f3976b14a5de4ce84b80a9c32a
Tree-SHA512: 33e25f6ff05d9b56fae2bdb68b132557bb8e995f5438ac4fbbc53c304c5152a98aa43c43600c31d8a6a2830cbd48bf8ec7d89dce50190b29ec00a43830126913
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Added v20 BIP9 style fork structure along with utility functions.
Since several features coming depending on that fork status, we needed
to group them into one
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This was reported/requested by @HashEngineering:
> Older versions of our App won't sync due to if (obj.nVersion ==
BASIC_BLS_VERSION) . Older versions don't know what version a SML Entry
is. As such, they will never read the type field. On the android client
this causes an offset problem when reading the mnlistdiff and it will
throw an exception that bans the peer that supplied it. Soon enough, no
peers will be left to connect to because they will all give the android
client bad data.
## What was done?
With this PR, SML will serialise the new v19 fields (`nType`,
`platformHTTPPort`, `platformNodeID`) if the client's version is at
least equal to `70227`.
Note: Serialisation for hashing skips the above rule.
Also, functional test mininode protocol version is set to `70227`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
During reviewing TODO were found some TODOes that can be done now.
## What was done?
- fix: follow-up dash#3467 - replaced commented code to disabled code
- follow-up bitcoin#16394 - uncommented code related to `watchonly`
feature
- removed out-dated TODO in `rpc/masternode.cpp` (already done)
- fix: renamed name of clean up test_unittests: removed TODO and updated
name of variable TRAVIS
- rewritten todo inside `.travis.yml`
- fix: adds a missing description for result of rpc `mnsync`
Last commit (`mnsync`) is an only candidate for backport to v19, other
changes are non significant.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run functional/unit tests
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5294
## What was done?
Bumped defaultAssumeValid, nMinimumChainWork, chainTxData,
checkPointsData
## How Has This Been Tested?
Called rpcs `getblockhash N`, `getblock HASH`, `getchaintxstats 17280
HASH`
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
9cc8e30125df14fe47e21e55ab3bf26f4d416565 test: fix sign comparison warning in socket tests (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This fixes:
```bash
In file included from test/sock_tests.cpp:10:
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/test/unit_test.hpp:18:
In file included from /usr/local/include/boost/test/test_tools.hpp:46:
/usr/local/include/boost/test/tools/old/impl.hpp:107:17: warning: comparison of integers of different signs: 'const long' and 'const unsigned long' [-Wsign-compare]
return left == right;
~~~~ ^ ~~~~~
```
which was introduced in #20788.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 9cc8e30125df14fe47e21e55ab3bf26f4d416565
vasild:
ACK 9cc8e30125df14fe47e21e55ab3bf26f4d416565
Tree-SHA512: 7069a4fde5cec01be03f8477fe396e53658f170efbf1d9ef3339d553bb90a2be9f4acd6b348127b14cd2f91426e0cd1fc35d2d3c9f201cf748c0cf50f47e46a5
b6aadcd5b4350a6ebcd57e88e7a0853cedf7c2fb build: Add -Werror=mismatched-tags (Hennadii Stepanov)
1485124291368c4a2ca8ea09c18e813f1dbabf5c Fix -Wmismatched-tags warnings (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Warnings were introduced in #20749:
```
./validation.h:43:1: warning: class 'CCheckpointData' was previously declared as a struct; this is valid, but may result in linker errors under the Microsoft C++ ABI [-Wmismatched-tags]
class CCheckpointData;
^
./chainparams.h:24:8: note: previous use is here
struct CCheckpointData {
^
./validation.h:43:1: note: did you mean struct here?
class CCheckpointData;
^~~~~
struct
1 warning generated.
```
This change fixes AppVeyor build: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/builds/37547435
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK b6aadcd5b4🚗
practicalswift:
cr ACK b6aadcd5b4350a6ebcd57e88e7a0853cedf7c2fb: patch looks correct
Tree-SHA512: 3ac887ebdbf9a1ae33c1fd5381b3b8d83388ad557ddeb55013acd42bb9752a5bd009e3a0eed52644a023a7a0dda1c159277981af82f58fb0abfe60b84e01bf29
ad57fb756b1c2df625790bd9c296ec28daa93740 wallet: Add BerkeleyDB version sanity check at init time (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Detect version conflicts between the run-time BerkeleyDB library and the one used during compilation.
This is very unsafe (can result in anything from crashes to corruption) so shut down when one is detected.
ACKs for top commit:
decryp2kanon:
utACK ad57fb7
achow101:
ACK ad57fb756b1c2df625790bd9c296ec28daa93740
theStack:
utACK ad57fb756b1c2df625790bd9c296ec28daa93740
meshcollider:
Code review ACK ad57fb756b1c2df625790bd9c296ec28daa93740
Tree-SHA512: 99cd7d836bffbdeb3d4e14053f7139cc85a6d42e631a3f9a3058a848042446b364faee127500f5acb374616e6a61ab2bedebfac1ba9bc993b4d6227114c2a6c2
faccf8b1e1af293dfe9158d732718e7798a2fd89 refactor: Enable -Wswitch for FeeEstimateHorizon (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This enables the `-Wswitch` compiler warning for `FeeEstimateHorizon` by removing the `default` case in `switch` statements.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK faccf8b1e1af293dfe9158d732718e7798a2fd89
jonatack:
ACK faccf8b1e1af293dfe9158d732718e7798a2fd89
hebasto:
ACK faccf8b1e1af293dfe9158d732718e7798a2fd89, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 63a8dff6e8dead149ec2fa8319e7ff41022c9534d423d3086fd8f22be073dc4915f74c7fe9139ee681a8204730cf58c80ef40c93fb33032d586e68b4f78f557d
fa0d8359b351fd179a0a2f458671a4d7828c9a80 log: Clarify that failure to read fee_estimates.dat is non-fatal (MarcoFalke)
faefa5db5f1d95b772873f4429e8a8fbb4e71cf3 log: Clarify that failure to write fee_estimates.dat is non-fatal (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
two minor logging fixups
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa0d8359b351fd179a0a2f458671a4d7828c9a80: patch looks correct
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa0d8359b351fd179a0a2f458671a4d7828c9a80
Tree-SHA512: d1e7e595d3b4a5e497ee7ab70f3be5783dafec2726ef8e012db836c15e8e622022859a4472d6b516fe19d327737b25fdfb509cd9aeb022ca847b13c54e55800a
675e55e01392971aa56bda56cb09498b466d0902 Ignore unknown messages before VERACK (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
This allows for feature negotiation to take place with messages between VERSION and VERACK in the future, without requiring additional software changes to specifically ignore messages for features that are unimplemented by our software.
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK 675e55e01392971aa56bda56cb09498b466d0902
practicalswift:
ACK 675e55e01392971aa56bda56cb09498b466d0902: patch looks correct
MarcoFalke:
ACK 675e55e01392971aa56bda56cb09498b466d0902
hebasto:
ACK 675e55e01392971aa56bda56cb09498b466d0902, the offender peer will be eventually disconnected due to the timeout.
Tree-SHA512: 8d2b1d8b9843f2ee26b2c30f7c5ff0bfcfbe3f46b32cd0369c48ece26624151091237e83ce3f18c6da004099026602cfab1642ac916db777f047d170b365c007
e1e1442f3eadc1d139380e71c1b60b86d8d6bdee Activate no-privkey -> ISMINE_WATCH_ONLY behavior for LegacySPKM only (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
Slight cleanup following https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16944
This should allow future scriptpubkeymans to transparently work, since the current plan is to have ismine always be spendable.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e1e1442f3eadc1d139380e71c1b60b86d8d6bdee
Sjors:
Code review ACK e1e1442f3eadc1d139380e71c1b60b86d8d6bdee
meshcollider:
Code review ACK e1e1442f3eadc1d139380e71c1b60b86d8d6bdee
Tree-SHA512: c0a86587d33b8b1646494a5cb0bf8681ee4a88e6913918157746943a0996b501903e0e6ee954cf04154c1e0faee0cbb375c74ca789f46ba9244eb5296632b042
This backports also includes extra changes that were missing from bitcoin#14711
They are required, otherwise impossible to remove validaion.h dependency as it meant in #17138
b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002 [wallet] Remove pruning check for -rescan option (John Newbery)
eea462de9c652dca556ad241d2126b10790f67f8 [wallet] Remove package limit config access from wallet (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Removes wallet access to `-limitancestorcount`, `-limitdescendantcount` and `-prune`:
- `-limitancestorcount` and `-limitdescendantcount` are now accessed with a method `getPackageLimits` in the `Chain` interface.
- `-prune` is not required. It was only used in wallet component initiation to prevent running `-rescan` when pruning was enabled. This check is not required.
Partially addresses #17137.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
Tested ACK b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002
promag:
Code review ACK b96ed0396294fc4fa89d83ceab6bc169dd09f002.
ariard:
ACK b96ed03, check there isn't left anymore wallet access to node arguments.
Tree-SHA512: 90c8e3e083acbd37724f1bccf63dab642cf9ae95cc5e684872a67443ae048b4fdbf57b52ea47c5a1da6489fd277278fe2d9bbe95e17f3d4965a1a0fbdeb815bf
- updated data file with dash addresses
- removed witness/bench32 support from rpc_createmultisig.py
- other specific changes, such as wallet balances after N mined blocks
- updated descriptors for multisort sign (fixes for bitcoin#17056)
19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046 Output a descriptor in createmultisig and addmultisigaddress (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Give a descriptor from `createmultisig` and `addmultisigaddress`.
Extracted from #16528 with `addmultisgaddress` and tests added.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
tACK 19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046
MarcoFalke:
ACK 19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046
promag:
Code review ACK 19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046.
meshcollider:
utACK 19a354b11f85a3c6c81ff83bf702bf7a40cf5046
Tree-SHA512: e813125fbbc358ea8d45b1748de16a29a94efd83175b748fb8fa3b0bfc8e783ed36b6c554d84f5d4ead1ba252a83a3e937b6c3f75da7b8d3b4e55f94d6013771
4bb660be90a2811b53855bf1fd33a8dd9ba3db47 Add release note (Andrew Chow)
ed96b295d747738334459490c79b7360ab85aaf7 Update descriptors.md to include sortedmulti (Andrew Chow)
80be78ea75ac9833ee3db3d468ed09fc4fe6274c Test sortedmulti descriptor using BIP 67 tests (Andrew Chow)
6f588fd2276e5b713c6d36e3b01288484ddb59c0 Add sortedmulti descriptor and unit tests (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds a `sortedmulti()` descriptor as mentioned in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/17023#issuecomment-537596416.
`sortedmulti()` works in the same way as `multi` does but sorts the pubkeys in the resulting scripts in lexicographic order as described in [BIP67](https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0067.mediawiki). Note that this does not add support for BIP67 nor is BIP67 fully supported by this descriptor (which is why it is not named `multi67()`) as it does not require compressed pubkeys.
Tests from BIP67 were added and documentation was updated.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
re-ACK 4bb660be90
Sjors:
re-ACK 4bb660be90a2811b53855bf1fd33a8dd9ba3db47
Tree-SHA512: 93b21112a74ebe0bf316d8f3e0291f69fd975cf0a29332f9728e7b880cad312b8b14007e86adcd7899f117b9303cbcf4cb35f3bb2f2f648d1a446f83f75a70a5
1b41c2c8a126ef4be183e1d800a17d85cab8837b test: improve gettransaction test coverage (Jon Atack)
0f34f54888f680bfbe7a29ac278636d7178a99bb rpc: fix regression in gettransaction (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Closes#16872.
PR #16866 renamed the `decode` argument in gettransaction to `verbose` to make it more consistent with other RPC calls like getrawtransaction. However, it inadvertently overloaded the "details" field when `verbose` is passed. The result is that the original "details" field is no longer returned correctly, which seems to be a breaking API change.
This PR:
- takes the simplest path to restoring the "details" field by renaming the decoded one back to "decoded" while leaving the `verbose` argument for API consistency, which was the main intent of #16866,
- addresses [this comment](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16185#discussion_r320740413) by mentioning in the RPC help that the new decoded field is equivalent to decoderawtransaction, and
- updates the help, functional test, and release note.
Reviewers, to test this manually, build and run `bitcoin-cli help gettransaction` and `bitcoin-cli gettransaction <wallet txid> false true`, and verify that the command returns both `details` and `decoded` fields.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
tACK 1b41c2c8a126ef4be183e1d800a17d85cab8837b
Tree-SHA512: 287edd5db7ed58fe8b548975aba58628bd45ed708b28f40174f10a35a455d89f796fbf27430aa881fc376f47aabda8803f74d4d100683bd86577a02279091cf3
7dee8f48088c75ab0e51be60679505f8ce570919 [wallet] Rename 'decode' argument in gettransaction method to 'verbose' (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This makes the RPC method consistent with other RPC methods that have a
'verbose' option.
Change the name of the return object from 'decoded' to details.
Update help text.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 7dee8f48088c75ab0e51be60679505f8ce570919.
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 7dee8f48088c75ab0e51be60679505f8ce570919
0xB10C:
ACK 7dee8f48088c75ab0e51be60679505f8ce570919: reviewed code
Tree-SHA512: a3a62265c8e6e914591f3b3b9f9dd4f42240dc8dab9cbac6ed8d8b8319b6cc847db2ad1689d5440c162e0698f31e39fc6b868ed918b2f62879d61b9865cae66b
9965940e35c445ccded55510348af228ff22f0e9 doc: Add release note for the new gettransaction argument (darosior)
b8b3f0435a2837d3897e9e232ef6ca839ce74eb8 tests: Add a new functional test for gettransaction (darosior)
7f3bb247a811582d1aa4805d8e601c19808dc7ba gettransaction: add an argument to decode the transaction (darosior)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a new parameter to the `gettransaction` call : `decode`. If set to `true`, it will add a new `decoded` field to the response. This mimics the behavior of `getrawtransaction`'s `verbose` argument to avoid using 2 calls if we want to decode a wallet transaction (`gettransaction` then `decoderawtransaction`).
Fix#16181 .
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
re-utACK 9965940e35c445ccded55510348af228ff22f0e9
Tree-SHA512: bcb6b4bd252b3488d6afc77659c499c2ad99fd58661eb24b6a2e17014c74f22e47fde70e00fedb4f4754915786622ad02483b2cf2c4dea0ab0eb4ac8276dbeee
593ba696fb32da558091ac02ad87c4893db4ce97 Add warning messages to the debug window (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Fix: #11016
This PR adds warning messages to the debug window in `-disablewallet` mode.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 593ba696fb32da558091ac02ad87c4893db4ce97
promag:
ACK 593ba696fb32da558091ac02ad87c4893db4ce97, agree with @Sjors https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14879#pullrequestreview-196433092 above.
ryanofsky:
utACK 593ba696fb32da558091ac02ad87c4893db4ce97
Tree-SHA512: a8ca78529bb16813ba7bfaf5ccd4349189979f08e78ea857746a6fb00fd9d7ed98d8f06f384830acba21dac57070060af23f6be8249398feb32a6efff1333de8
14879 followup: move label_alerts css styling into css files and align it with the style of labelAlerts on OverviewPage
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
0fb2e69815 CreateTransaction: Assume minimum p2sh-p2wpkh spend size for unknown change (Gregory Sanders)
b06483c96a Remove stale comment in CalculateMaximumSignedInputSize (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
This is triggered anytime a fundraw type call(psbt or legacy) is used with a change output address that the wallet doesn't know how to sign for.
This regression was added in 6a34ff5335 since BnB coin selection actually cares about this.
The fix is to assume the smallest typical spend, a P2SH-P2WPKH, which is calculated using a "prototype" dummy signature flow. Future work could generalize this infrastructure to get estimated sizes of inputs for a variety of types.
I also removed a comment which I believe is stale and misleading.
Tree-SHA512: c7e2be189e524f81a7aa4454ad9370cefba715e3781f1e462c8bab77e4d27540191419029e3ebda11e3744c0703271e479dcd560d05e4d470048d9633e34da16
5eb20f81d9 Consistently use ParseHashV to validate hash inputs in rpc (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
ParseHashV validates the length and encoding of the string and throws
an informative RPC error on failure, which is as good or better than
these alternative calls.
Note I switched ParseHashV to check string length first, because
IsHex tests that the length is even, and an error like:
"must be of length 64 (not 63, for X)" is much more informative than
"must be hexadecimal string (not X)" in that case.
Split from #13420
Tree-SHA512: f0786b41c0d7793ff76e4b2bb35547873070bbf7561d510029e8edb93f59176277efcd4d183b3185532ea69fc0bbbf3dbe9e19362e8017007ae9d51266cd78ae
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Mainnet activation start time is set to: `Tuesday, April 25, 2023
0:00:00`,
and timeout to: `Thursday, April 25, 2024 0:00:00`
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Added a new label showing the number of total and enabled HPMN.
The existing label was updated to show the number of total and enabled
regular MNs instead.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Not having them in the list is 1. wrong 2. creates empty entries in
results (nullptr-s)
Should fix crashes like
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5287#issuecomment-1498518599
## What was done?
Add missing entries
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run dash-qt on testnet, wait when a HPMN is the payee. develop - crash,
this PR - no crash.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
vote thresholds were counted incorrectly
## What was done?
switch from `GetValidMNsCount()` to `GetValidWeightedMNsCount()`
## How Has This Been Tested?
...
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Added BLS threshold signature unit tests.
Similar test is already present in bls_signatures but it won't hurt us
to have it Dash repo as well.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
The `<stdexcept>` include is needed for `std::runtime_error` definition.
The `<cstdint>` include is needed for `uint8_t` and `uint32_t`
definition.
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Compilation failure with GCC 13.
GCC 13 is more strict about missing includes that were included
indirectly by previous versions of GCC.
## What was done?
Added missing includes.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Successful compilation on Fedora 38 with GCC 13. All tests passed
successfully.
## Breaking Changes
None.
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
Signed-off-by: Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
Co-authored-by: Oleg Girko <ol@infoserver.lv>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Masternodes tab was showing UNKNOWN next payment for some enabled MNs
reported by @kxcd aka xkcd
## What was done?
ask for the maximum data available, let GetProjectedMNPayees crop it
## How Has This Been Tested?
run dash-qt, check the list on Masternodes tab
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
2455aa5d7f54befeade05795ed8f5dd89d01042a [rpc] changed MineBlocksOnDemand to IsMockableChain (Gloria Zhao)
Pull request description:
Change: Update the if statement in `setmocktime` to use `IsMockableChain` chainparams function (aka `m_is_mockable_chain`) instead of `MineBlocksOnDemand`
Rationale: It's a more appropriate check for whether or not chain is in RegTest, as [discussed](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18037#discussion_r376509388) in #18037
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 2455aa5d7f54befeade05795ed8f5dd89d01042a 🙇
jonatack:
ACK 2455aa5d7f54befeade05795ed8f5dd89d01042a
Tree-SHA512: 1d8c8b7ff0b3c1bcbf5755194969b6664fe05a35003375ad08d18e34bcefd2df4f64d0e60078a10bbef3c8f469a9b9d07db467089b55c14cf532304bc965bffc
7bf4ce4f644bb7dac9b63172c656b5d599eedea3 refactor: test/bench: dedup SetupDummyInputs() (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The only difference between `SetupDummyInputs()` in `test/transaction_tests.cpp` and the one in `bench/ccoins_caching.cpp` was the nValue amounts of the outputs, so we allow to pass those in an extra (fixed-size) array parameter.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 7bf4ce4f64, only change is schuffling includes 🚶
Empact:
ACK 7bf4ce4f64
Tree-SHA512: e13643b2470f6b6ab429da0c0a8eebd4cb41e2ff2e421ef36f85fa4847bf4ea8aab88d59a01e94cac4c4eb85edb561463f02215b174c50b573ac6bbcc2bf98a3
faebf6271467048dc8a9a0c526a0f8565023a966 rpc: Use Join helper in rpc/util (MarcoFalke)
fa8cd6f9c13319baca467864661982a3dfb2320c util: Add Join helper to join a list of strings (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
We have a lot of enumerations in the code and sometimes those enumerations need to be mentioned in the RPC or command line documentation. Previously, each caller would have a couple of lines inline to join the strings or the joined string is hardcoded in the documentation. A helper to join strings would make code such as https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16629#discussion_r315852446 less verbose and easier to read.
Also, warnings commonly accumulate in complex RPCs, since a warning doesn't lead to an early return. A helper to join those warnings would make code such as https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16394/files#r309324997 less verbose and easier to read.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK faebf6271467048dc8a9a0c526a0f8565023a966
Tree-SHA512: 80f2db86a05c63b686f510585c1c631250271a8958fd71fafaac91559ffd2ec25d609bf7d53412ba27f87eff5893ac9dd9c2f296fc0c73581556e1d6a734a36f
b7b9f6e4cee262004643e2fe03d56cb47fdbf5c2 Remove p2pEnabled from Chain interface (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
RPC server starts in warmup mode, it can't process yet calls, then follows connection manager initialization and finally RPC server get out of warmup mode. RPC calls shouldn't be able to get P2P disabled errors because once we initialize g_connman it's not unset until shutdown, after RPC server has been stopped.
@mzumsande comment in #15713 let me thought that `p2pEnabled` was maybe useless, `g_connman` is always initialized before RPC server is getting out of warmup. These checks against P2P state were introduced in 5b446dd5b1.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK b7b9f6e4cee262004643e2fe03d56cb47fdbf5c2
jnewbery:
ACK b7b9f6e4cee262004643e2fe03d56cb47fdbf5c2
Tree-SHA512: 4de2b9fc496bf8347ff5cc645848a5a44c8ca7596cd134f17f3088f5f8262d1d88b8e2a052df93e309ec9a81956a808df17a9eb9f10d4f4d693c95d607fe3561
80ba4241a6773590f6b2c18dae758097b5adc02e extract min & max depth onto coin control (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
- Refactor `AvailableCoins` to pull min & max depths from coin control.
- Add `m_max_depth` to coin control to support this.
- Addresses issue https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15823, see thread for further details.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 80ba4241a6773590f6b2c18dae758097b5adc02e
Tree-SHA512: 8f7c0aa90b3bc3667baf6741b1da2829f3919e1df92ae097d86c6b239f0c024eb410d7100e6251ea8fc49d022fb5a1214bf79b0f8b0014945b7784b2311647d1
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix typos in getrawtransaction and decoderawtransaction help texts
## What was done?
tweak field name to match
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/src/core_write.cpp#L192
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
should fix "qdata: Already received" discouraging issue
the root of the issue is that we remove expired requests on
UpdatedBlockTip which is too late sometimes.
## What was done?
replacing expired requests with a new one in RequestQuorumData kind of
does the same (drops the expired request) but without waiting for
UpdatedBlockTip
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
ca185cf5a14b16d61814d7172284bc8efcd28b69 doc: Document differences in bitcoind and bitcoin-qt locale handling (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Document differences in `bitcoind` and `bitcoin-qt` locale handling.
Since this seems to be the root cause to the locale dependency issues we've seen over the years I thought it was worth documenting :)
Note that 1.) `QLocale` (used by Qt), 2.) C locale (used by locale-sensitive C standard library functions/POSIX functions and some parts of the C++ standard library such as `std::to_string`) and 3.) C++ locale (used by the C++ input/output library) are three separate things. This comment is about the perhaps surprising interference with the C locale (2) that takes place as part of the Qt initialization.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK ca185cf5a14b16d61814d7172284bc8efcd28b69
Tree-SHA512: e51c32f3072c506b0029a001d8b108125e1acb4f2b6a48a6be721ddadda9da0ae77a9b39ff33f9d9eebabe2244c1db09e8502e3e7012d7a5d40d98e96da0dc44
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
add a bias to IsExpired to avoid potential timing issues where nodeA thinks it's been 300 seconds but nodeB only thinks it's been 295 for some reason
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`GetProjectedMNPayees` wasn't projecting MN payees correctly.
## What was done?
HPMNs are now added 4 times before sorting the return list.
In addition, the case of last payee being HPMN and having still pending
payments is handled.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Tested on Masternodes / Next Payment tab on Qt client on Testnet.
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Currently, we store internally the nodes that already requested
`QGETDATA` for the same Quorum.
If data for the same Quorum is requested twice from the same `proRegTx`,
then the requester is P2P misbehaved.
## What was done?
Some data like `VerificationVector` and `EncryptedContributions` are not
instantly available.
This PR does not misbehave nodes for requesting data that weren't
available when asked.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
RPC help has a wrongly generated RPC help output in CLI and online help:
https://dashcore.readme.io/docs/core-api-ref-remote-procedure-calls-wallet#getwalletinfo
New version:
```
...
"hdaccounts" : [ (json array)
{ (json object)
"hdaccountindex" : n, (numeric) the index of the account
"hdexternalkeyindex" : n, (numeric) current external childkey index
"hdinternalkeyindex" : n (numeric) current internal childkey index
},
...
],
...
```
against old version:
```
...
"" : [ (json array)
{ (json object)
"hdaccountindex" : n, (numeric) the index of the account
"hdexternalkeyindex" : n, (numeric) current external childkey index
"hdinternalkeyindex" : n (numeric) current internal childkey index
},
...
],
...
```
## What was done?
Add a missing name `hdaccounts` for that key for `getwalletinfo` RPC
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run a command `help getwalletinfo` for old and for new versions.
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes. It doesn't change rpc, only change text description
(help).
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
914923d125f5d17b39b4dc05f666d130e80a68b2 Add setting as known type (Peter Bushnell)
Pull request description:
When loading old wallets I get "Unknown wallet records" showing up in the log file. The key that is adding to the unknown record count is "setting", this is a known key removed in the 0.6 release of Bitcoin in the commit linked below. The "setting" key is not known to the wallet anymore, like "acentry" which is not added as an unknown record, but the "setting" key was used in previous versions of Bitcoin.
972060ce0e (diff-8094838580e1bb7a3bb8fc78dcebc733)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 914923d125f5d17b39b4dc05f666d130e80a68b2, this code change is straightforward enough and I don't think it makes sense to warn about this key being present.
meshcollider:
ACK 914923d125f5d17b39b4dc05f666d130e80a68b2
Tree-SHA512: 6346690c05cebae2dcd868512322bf5250f6fbd07abb5e747065444185d3f69e19e1a99e3f38d6e34535ffd6979b2297100ba9c7da8e45ca792598eded5ae0d3
fab0c820fa4c0c3227eec85c64310a3bf938a149 rpc: Clarify that block count means height excl genesis (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There is a common misconception that the block count returned by the blockchain rpcs includes the genesis block. See for example the discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16292#issuecomment-506303256.
However, it really returns the height, which is `0` for the genesis block.
So clarify that and also remove the misleading "longest blockchain" comment.
Finally, fix the wallet test that incorrectly used this rpc.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK fab0c820fa
promag:
ACK fab0c82, sorry for the misconception.
Tree-SHA512: 0d087cbb628d3866352bca6420402f392e6a997e579941701a408a7fca355d84645045661f39b022e4479cc07f85a6cddaa9095b6fd9911b245692482420a5e4
0f459d868d85053f1cc066ea9099793f88cbd655 fix an undefined behavior in uint::SetHex (Kaz Wesley)
Pull request description:
Decrementing psz beyond the beginning of the string is UB, even though
the out-of-bounds pointer is never dereferenced.
I don't think any clang sanitizer covers this, so I don't see any way a test could catch the original behavior.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
utACK 0f459d8.
l2a5b1:
utACK 0f459d868d85053f1cc066ea9099793f88cbd655
Tree-SHA512: 388223254ea6e955f643d2ebdf74d15a3d494e9f0597d9f05987ebb708d7a1cc06ce64bd25d447d75b5f5561bdae9630dcf25adb7bd75f7a382298b95d127162
01174596e69568c434198a86f54cb9ea6740e6c2 signrawtransactionwithkey: report error when missing redeemScript/witnessScript param (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Adding support for "witnessScript" as an alternative to "redeemScript" when using "signrawtransactionwithkey" meant that the `RPCTypeCheckObj()` call in `SignTransaction` can't error out just because either parameter is missing -- it's only a problem if both are missing, which isn't a state `RPCTypeCheckObj()` tests for. This results in the regression described in #16249. This patch adds some code to test for this case and give a similar error, namely:
error code: -8
error message:
Missing redeemScript/witnessScript
Fixes: #16249
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK 01174596e6
promag:
ACK 01174596e. Could also write test without `dict`/`del`:
Tree-SHA512: cf51346b7dea551b7f18f2a93c2a336a293b2535c62c03a5263cd2be8c58cf0cc302891da659c167e88ad1a68a756472c3c07e99f71627c61d32886fc5a3a353
303372c41a8d5c58a46cf9ed595e30e67bd0bc99 docs: Improve netaddress comments (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Improves comments for `netaddress`, making them available to Doxygen.
I think this is worthwhile because a lot of the code require some context (e.g., A lot of the things that we do to fit hostnames and tor addresses into `CNetAddr` is non-obvious, and documenting it is beneficial).
ACKs for commit 303372:
Tree-SHA512: 2a35784a01ed8ec5fdbe111a540192d31bde16afa96e4be97b0385daf290fc7469a66d7cb8905a70b920fad6a0e7400ca4e5da082d6e4af1d1aaccc0e8297720
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Indentation was wrong
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Added RPC `cleardiscouraged` which clears internally the list of
discouraged peers.
Note: Implementation of a `listdiscouraged` RPC is not possible because
the internal data structure used for discouraged peers is a Bloom
filter.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Added logs with requested parameters (`llmqType`, `quorumHash`,
`proRegTx`) when sending `qgetdata` for better troubleshooting.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We are seeing lots of "invalid mnauth" on testnet.. We should be logging
this anyhow
## What was done?
Add some logging the the mnauth sig isn't valid
## How Has This Been Tested?
make check
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
867a5e172a23899a4a70eca4a396c64f1951745e guix: Register garbage collector root for containers (Carl Dong)
8f8b96fb542701b7717683caa3848390b24f77ab guix: Update hint messages to mention guix-clean (Carl Dong)
44f6d4f56b16e1dc5e8a23318b8e7aad0665f178 guix: Record precious directories and add guix-clean (Carl Dong)
84912d4b24382ae022da3a863bd6caa2b8948d94 build: Remove spaces from variable-printing rules (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
guix: Record precious directories and add guix-clean
Many users have reported problems that stem from having an unclean
working tree. To that end, I've written a guix-clean script which should
help reset the working tree while respecting user-specified precious
directories.
Precious directories, such as:
- SOURCES_PATH
- BASE_CACHE
- SDK_PATH
- OUTDIR
Should be preserved when cleaning the working tree, and are thus
recorded in ./contrib/guix/var/precious_dirs.
The ./contrib/guix/guix-clean script is able to parse that file and make
sure to avoid them when cleaning out the working tree.
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 867a5e172a23899a4a70eca4a396c64f1951745e
Tree-SHA512: c498fad781ff5e6406639df2b91b687fc528273fdf266bcdba8f6eec3b3b37ecce544b6da0252f0b9c6717f9d88e844e4c7b72d1877bdbabfc6871ddd0172af5
5200929bfe26c549d7da92c0adf8adf61e143416 depends: Include GUIX_ENVIRONMENT in id string (Carl Dong)
4c7d41858821e4fecf7cb0cec3fcad002365e6c9 depends: Improve id string robustness (Carl Dong)
b3bdff42b5a7b4b956da700b187a7254daac54ae build: Proper quoting for var printing targets (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
```
Environment variables and search paths can drastically effect the
operation of build tools.
Include these in our id string to mitigate against false cache hits.
```
Note to builders: This will invalidate all depends output caches in `BASE_CACHE`
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK 5200929bfe26c549d7da92c0adf8adf61e143416
Tree-SHA512: e70c98da89cde90dc54bc3be89b925787cf94bbf246e27cc9345816b312073d78a02215448f731f21d8cf033c455234a2377ff1d66c00e1f3db69c9c9687d027
f1694757ddbcb3635213b085e864851e285c8c12 guix: Fix typo (Carl Dong)
771c4b98a8693eee642f2b118b3193fe6e022291 guix: README: Add darwin HOSTS entry (Carl Dong)
8dbf18cb1d3260d34ba822ceb12e67b1f124ea13 guix: Check for macOS SDK before building anything (Carl Dong)
34b23f597ec52efb795d72e9e5620712d0010edd guix: Set ZERO_AR_DATE for darwin build determinism (Carl Dong)
f3835dc6a3732dcd4afbb5987f84dc27f2bf55af build: Make xorrisofs reproducible with -volume_date (Carl Dong)
c9eb4cf3a0f81bfd72f06fd43b5610f0a4f5e804 guix: Add support for darwin builds (Carl Dong)
37fe73a092b08fe9d7ce636a1021429de6cda757 build: Add var printing target to src/Makefile.am (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
This PR brings our Guix builds on par with Gitian in terms of supported architectures.
Reviewers: if you run a build, please submit:
```
find output/ -type f -print0 | env LC_ALL=C sort -z | xargs -r0 sha256sum
```
So that we can compare hashes and ensure reproducibility!
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK f1694757ddbcb3635213b085e864851e285c8c12 - I think we can make some small usability improvements, but this is ok to merge now.
Tree-SHA512: 4af2b71654a9736467dcc681d10601c6eee37800d7847011a50585455b67b55d61742ca5604585f310a2fd75335b674e5e27dfb5169cb2f26e112aa4c411d8be
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Keeping too many triggers on testnet and syncing them can result in p2p
bans because some of these triggers might be invalid already. Limiting
their lifetime should help.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We reset operator info on revocation; but then on replacement via new
register we try to "RemoveMN", which tries to remove platformNodeID but
that's already been cleared
## What was done?
Only try to delete platformNodeID if it's non-null
## How Has This Been Tested?
Mined with it on testnet; mining works
## Breaking Changes
This will fork off other testnet nodes, as this fixes the logic
## Checklist:
<!--- Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes
that apply. -->
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**For repository code-owners and collaborators only**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: Odysseas Gabrielides <odysseas.gabrielides@gmail.com>
