* Merge #11308: [qa] zapwallettxes: Wait up to 3s for mempool reload
fadd0c16b [qa] zapwallettxes: Wait up to 3s for mempool reload (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There had been intermittent test failures on zapwallettxes, as no time was allotted to reload the mempool.
Tree-SHA512: 993254d2aaca6ea42fceefffed0cf90bdda91c64150179ef2a11337c3fe2cc6bf42b83ea9d9a1a575204fbde2676d7203443b00d053e8c2ed43e017c09d3ab11
* Fix import
3f8fa7f Make sure to clean up mapBlockSource if we've already seen the block (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Otherwise we may leave them dangling.
Credit TheBlueMatt.
Tree-SHA512: 8be77e08ebfc4f5b206d5ee7cfbe87f92c1eb5bc2b412471993658fe210306789aaf0f3d1454c635508a7d8effede2cf5ac144d622b0157b872733d9661d65c3
e93ff71 Add instructions for multi-processor gitian builds (Charlie Lee)
Pull request description:
This makes builds much faster if you have a multi-core machine.
Tree-SHA512: edb64c691a31a8a2e6c45f87886912d429a3fd600ebc0de2b16d44efd9d38bb92fea33c5fed207ad684b75d3247218912cab67661466a5538d534845e0808c9f
c5ebddd11 Tests: address placement should be deterministic by default (René Nyffenegger)
Pull request description:
Better version of wrong and closed pull request https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10764
Tree-SHA512: dfda6ea4a9dd0f4c8b96212ad43a716ff1dddf115cd2712a2a7e42c97fc9494079c746906b39d880a9827c05d2b75c728afd4ca4519ce4d365f0dae0c4aec24c
faa76d1b7 qa: Fix inv race in example_test (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There have been intermittent test failures on this script.
```py
File "./test/functional/example_test.py", line 216, in run_test
assert_equal(block, 1)
AssertionError: not(2 == 1)
```
Probably the simplest way to fix them is overriding the `on_inv` method, so that no "colliding" getdata for the blocks are sent out.
Additionally, all getdata are now sent in a single message.
Tree-SHA512: 809c2bbfa90a67fc97905769fcbe90ba9abe1aac1f145530934f56a364835973b94d3302b6be68f4f2987acf333bce146bcc4c878c283301871ba5bb1a9bedb6
fd05132e5 Restore default format state of cout after printing with std::fixed/setprecision (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Restore default format state of `std::cout` after printing with `std::fixed`/`std::setprecision`.
Tree-SHA512: 445b5b42aff58e2350939e8febc9b4a6fff478616abfe831aec42bee906cefac7a153c93d506407fb213d04dae9c7afbb5bfd344be63ca0f40ae39b331a4144f
13b1e9a16 Capitalize bullet points in CONTRIBUTING guide (Evan Klitzke)
Pull request description:
English grammar dictates that these bullet points should be capitalized.
This also makes the capitalization style consistent with the rest of the
document, e.g. the "Decision Making Process" section.
Tree-SHA512: 59f5a8941180ff3862ba63d364c27fd83d2e144299a71b2e784d58f806e8a02d7951dcc80fcc7152d0c78c2d1f5a22db1236af7ea6b9abece8dbe93533e4b65c
ce07638 doc: Add comment to use ValueFromAmount/AmountFromValue for JSON, not utilmoneystr (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
ec05c50 rpc: Use ValueFromAmount instead of FormatMoney in TxToUniv (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
46347ad rpc: Move ValueFromAmount to core_write (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
dac3782 doc: Correct AmountFromValue/ValueFromAmount names (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
With this, the amounts returned in `decoderawtransaction` will be padded to 8 digits like anywhere else in the API.
This is accomplished by using `ValueFromAmount` in `TxToUniv`, instead of `FormatMoney` which it currently (mistakingly) uses. The `FormatMoney` function is only for debugging/logging use!
To avoid dependency issues, `ValueFromAmount` is moved to `core_write.cpp`, where it also fits better. I don't move `AmountFromValue` to `core_read.cpp` at the same time, as this would have more impact due to the RPCError dependency there.
(n.b.: large number of changed files is solely due to the util_tests JSONs needing update)
Tree-SHA512: 10fc2d27d33a77dbcb57aa7eccd4f53110c05d38eb7df6d40f10f14c08fad4274472e93af75aa59fe68ad0720fdf0930f0108124abef518e0dd162b3d2b2b292
11dd29b [net] Fix use of uninitialized value in getnetworkinfo(const JSONRPCRequest& request) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
When running `test_bitcoin` under Valgrind I found the following issue:
```
$ valgrind src/test/test_bitcoin
...
==10465== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
==10465== at 0x6D09B61: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
==10465== by 0x6D0B1BB: std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > std::num_put<char, std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > >::_M_insert_int<unsigned long>(std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::ios_base&, char, unsigned long) const (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
==10465== by 0x6D0B36C: std::num_put<char, std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> > >::do_put(std::ostreambuf_iterator<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::ios_base&, char, unsigned long) const (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
==10465== by 0x6D17699: std::ostream& std::ostream::_M_insert<unsigned long>(unsigned long) (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.21)
==10465== by 0x4CAAD7: operator<< (ostream:171)
==10465== by 0x4CAAD7: formatValue<ServiceFlags> (tinyformat.h:345)
==10465== by 0x4CAAD7: void tinyformat::detail::FormatArg::formatImpl<ServiceFlags>(std::ostream&, char const*, char const*, int, void const*) (tinyformat.h:523)
==10465== by 0x1924D4: format (tinyformat.h:510)
==10465== by 0x1924D4: tinyformat::detail::formatImpl(std::ostream&, char const*, tinyformat::detail::FormatArg const*, int) (tinyformat.h:803)
==10465== by 0x553A55: vformat (tinyformat.h:947)
==10465== by 0x553A55: format<ServiceFlags> (tinyformat.h:957)
==10465== by 0x553A55: std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > tinyformat::format<ServiceFlags>(char const*, ServiceFlags const&) (tinyformat.h:966)
==10465== by 0x54C952: getnetworkinfo(JSONRPCRequest const&) (net.cpp:462)
==10465== by 0x28EDB5: CallRPC(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >) (rpc_tests.cpp:31)
==10465== by 0x293947: rpc_tests::rpc_togglenetwork::test_method() (rpc_tests.cpp:88)
==10465== by 0x2950E5: rpc_tests::rpc_togglenetwork_invoker() (rpc_tests.cpp:84)
==10465== by 0x182496: invoke<void (*)()> (callback.hpp:56)
==10465== by 0x182496: boost::unit_test::ut_detail::callback0_impl_t<boost::unit_test::ut_detail::unused, void (*)()>::invoke() (callback.hpp:89)
...
```
The read of the uninitialized variable `nLocalServices` is triggered by `g_connman->GetLocalServices()` in `getnetworkinfo(const JSONRPCRequest& request)` (`net.cpp:462`):
```c++
UniValue getnetworkinfo(const JSONRPCRequest& request)
{
...
if(g_connman)
obj.push_back(Pair("localservices", strprintf("%016x", g_connman->GetLocalServices())));
...
}
```
The reason for the uninitialized `nLocalServices` is that `CConnman::Start(...)` is not called
by the tests, and hence the initialization normally performed by `CConnman::Start(...)` is
not done.
This commit adds a method `Init(const Options& connOptions)` which is called by both the
constructor and `CConnman::Start(...)`. This method initializes `nLocalServices` and the other
relevant values from the supplied `Options` object.
Tree-SHA512: d8742363acffd03b2ee081cc56840275569e17edc6fa4bb1dee4a5971ffe4b8ab1d2fe7b68f98a086bf133b7ec46f4e471243ca08b45bf82356e8c831a5a5f21
9baca41 build: always attempt to enable targeted sse42 cxxflags (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
For depends builds without this, configure thinks that the user has overridden CXXFLAGS manually, when really they've just been set by the config.site.
The effect is that warnings and extra cxxflags (sse4.2 for example) were not being added.
Tree-SHA512: 9fd615ad0e926bd9d6b541ffcf7fc555e2147e8761f57ff3b5fb5d196c9cef0f26aa99681ff72db8c83c0f9a7ed91f4253f46bab09f2c835044b68047358fa47
49d903e Eliminate fee overpaying edge case when subtracting fee from recipients (Alex Morcos)
Pull request description:
I'm not sure if this is the cause of the issue in #10034 , but this was a known edge case. I just didn't realize how simple the fix is.
Could use a couple more eyes to make sure nothing silly can go wrong here, but if we all agree it's this simple, we can add this as another 0.15 bug fix.
Tree-SHA512: db1dd1e83363a3c231267b626d3a388893ee70ba1972056fe2c339c5c9e4fbfd30f7fe837c30cc7be884d454797fd4c619b9d631a8d5eeb55cdb07402a83acb3
d84e78e [wallet] Specify wallet name in wallet loading errors (John Newbery)
a6da027 Reject invalid wallet files (João Barbosa)
3ef77a0 Reject duplicate wallet filenames (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR prevents loading the same wallet more than once in a multi wallet scenario. It also prevents loading with invalid files: non regular files or symlinks.
Tree-SHA512: 45bf814096bb788db1c76ff334e679a10686cee7d9c8cd48fe5d924031353ace271f6fb0d4af49a34246d336945515c176920a552be7b9fbe07ab8e00e5f6e5e
df389bc Change wallet method disabled error text (Russell Yanofsky)
e526b3d Fix misleading "Method not found" multiwallet errors (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Raise RPC_WALLET_NOT_SPECIFIED instead of RPC_METHOD_NOT_FOUND when a required
wallet filename was not specified in an RPC call.
Also raise more specific RPC_WALLET_NOT_FOUND error instead of
RPC_INVALID_PARAMETER in case an invalid wallet was specified, for consistency.
Tree-SHA512: 6a8d885283f69bcfc28f2e08ac03eff02f9f8160a312ce2a90d868aa52533434fc0b4c4ab86547c2f09392338956df915637eaf7136a4fc105e6c8179f2d0ac8
05e023f Move CloseSocket out of SetSocketNonBlocking and pass SOCKET by const reference in SetSocket* functions (Dag Robole)
Pull request description:
Rationale:
Readability, SetSocketNonBlocking does what it says on the tin.
Consistency, More consistent with the rest of the API in this unit.
Reusability, SetSocketNonBlocking can also be used by clients that may not want to close the socket on failure.
This also moves the responsibility of closing the socket back to the caller that opened it, which in general should know better how and when to close it.
Tree-SHA512: 85027137f1b626e2b636549ee38cc757a587adcf464c84be6e65ca16e3b75d7ed1a1b21dd70dbe34c7c5d599af39e53b89932dfe3c74f91a22341ff3af5ea80a
876e92b Testing: listsinceblock should display all transactions that were affected since the given block, including transactions that were removed due to a reorg. (Karl-Johan Alm)
f999c46 listsinceblock: optionally find and list any transactions that were undone due to reorg when requesting a non-main chain block in a new 'removed' array. (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
The following scenario will not notify the caller of the fact `tx0` has been dropped:
1. User 1 receives BTC in tx0 from utxo1 in block aa1.
2. User 2 receives BTC in tx1 from utxo1 (same) in block bb1
3. User 1 sees 2 confirmations at block aa3.
4. Reorg into bb chain.
5. User 1 asks `listsinceblock aa3` and does not see that tx0 is now invalidated.
See `listsinceblock.py` commit for related test.
The proposed fix is to iterate from the given block down to the fork point, and to check each transaction in the blocks against the wallet, in addition to including all transactions from the fork point to the active chain tip (the current behavior). Any transactions that were present will now also be listed in the `listsinceblock` output in a new `replaced` array. This operation may be a bit heavy but the circumstances (and perceived frequency of occurrence) warrant it, I believe.
Example output:
```Python
{
'transactions': [],
'replaced': [
{
'walletconflicts': [],
'vout': 1,
'account': '',
'timereceived': 1485234857,
'time': 1485234857,
'amount': '1.00000000',
'bip125-replaceable': 'unknown',
'trusted': False,
'category': 'receive',
'txid': 'ce673859a30dee1d2ebdb3c05f2eea7b1da54baf68f93bb8bfe37c5f09ed22ff',
'address': 'miqEt4kWp9zSizwGGuUWLAmxEcTW9bFUnQ',
'label': '',
'confirmations': -7
}
],
'lastblock': '7a388f27d09e3699102a4ebf81597d974fc4c72093eeaa02adffbbf7527f6715'
}
```
I believe this addresses the comment by @luke-jr in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9516#issuecomment-274190081 but I could be wrong..
Tree-SHA512: 607b5dcaeccb9dc0d963d3de138c40490f3e923050b29821e6bd513d26beb587bddc748fbb194503fe618cfe34a6ed65d95e8d9c5764a882b6c5f976520cff35
44eb9d4 [QA] Avoid running multiwallet.py twice (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
It's already on L92.
Second script execution was introduced in #106043707fcd94e (probably rebase issue)
Reported by @MarcoFalke
Tree-SHA512: cd2873df08e31cbf5b7a43b5e6713b643b758496d4357dcc99d1c3ad2da07e55f6d69996654d17d3f5484219cb5fd4e32da3bfd94701d1137bc955241d285e57
d9d1bd3 nCheckDepth chain height fix (romanornr)
Pull request description:
````
if (nCheckDepth <= 0)
nCheckDepth = 1000000000; // suffices until the year 19000
if (nCheckDepth > chainActive.Height())
nCheckDepth = chainActive.Height();
````
These lines confuse me.
Correct me if I am wrong, but we can't check any more blocks than we have right?
If someone requests <= 0 it get set it into some huge number and then immediately limit it to the chain height in the following statement.
````
if (nCheckDepth > chainActive.Height())
nCheckDepth = chainActive.Height();
````
when using ````--checkblocks=Z```` When Z is ````0```` or any other negative number, it will check all blocks.
I think it should be changed to this maybe.
````
if (nCheckDepth <= 0 || nCheckDepth > chainActive.Height())
nCheckDepth = chainActive.Height();
````
Which gets rid of that huge number which is confusing for any other altcoins that have a different block time.
Tree-SHA512: 8ee0ae5f33b399fa74dc16926709694ccfe1fc8a043cba2f5d00884220ac1b9b13f2df4588041f4133be634e5c7b14f4eebe24294028dafe91581a97dbe627f3
0f402b9 Fix rare edge case of paying too many fees when transaction has no change. (Alex Morcos)
253cd7e Only reserve key for scriptChange once in CreateTransaction (Alex Morcos)
Pull request description:
This is an alternative to #10333
See commit messages.
The first commit is mostly code move, it just moves the change creation code out of the loop.
@instagibbs
Tree-SHA512: f16287ae0f0c6f09cf8b1f0db5880bb567ffa74a50898e3d1ef549ba592c6309ae1a9b251739f63a8bb622d48f03ce2dff9e7a57a6bac4afb4b95b0a86613ea8
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
