084e17cebd424b8e8ced674bc810eef4e6ee5d3b Remove unused includes (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
As requested by MarcoFalke in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16273#issuecomment-521332089:
This PR removes unused includes.
Please note that in contrast to #16273 I'm limiting the scope to the trivial cases of pure removals (i.e. no includes added) to make reviewing easier.
I'm seeking "Concept ACK":s for this obviously non-urgent minor cleanup.
Rationale:
* Avoids unnecessary re-compiles in case of header changes.
* Makes reasoning about code dependencies easier.
* Reduces compile-time memory usage.
* Reduces compilation time.
* Warm fuzzy feeling of being lean :-)
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 084e17cebd424b8e8ced674bc810eef4e6ee5d3b. PR only removes include lines and it still compiles. In the worst case someone might have to explicitly add an include later for something now included implicitly. But maybe some effort was taken to avoid this, and it wouldn't be a tragedy anyway.
Tree-SHA512: 89de56edc6ceea4696e9579bccff10c80080821685b9fb4e8c5ef593b6e43cf662f358788701bb09f84867693f66b2e4db035b92b522a0a775f50b7ecffd6a6d
984d72ec659361d8c1a6f3c6864e839a807817a7 Return the script type from Solver (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
Because false is synonymous with TX_NONSTANDARD, this conveys the same
information and makes the handling explicitly based on script type,
simplifying each call site.
Prior to this change it was common for the return value to be ignored, or for the
return value and TX_NONSTANDARD to be redundantly handled.
Tree-SHA512: 31864f856b8cb75f4b782d12678070e8b1cfe9665c6f57cfb25e7ac8bcea8a22f9a78d7c8cf0101c841f2a612400666fb91798bffe88de856e98b873703b0965
# Conflicts:
# src/bloom.cpp
# src/policy/policy.cpp
# src/rpc/rawtransaction.cpp
# src/script/sign.cpp
# src/script/standard.cpp
# src/test/script_standard_tests.cpp
# src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp
Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
4c825792dd9f4eaf4936c3e376ac7a5c177528e2 Remove outdated comment about DER encoding (Elichai Turkel)
Pull request description:
This comment got me confused about the status of BIP66 (Thanks jnewbery for explaining)
The comment was added in: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3843
But in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/5713 strict DER encoding was enforced in consensus,
and is now it's buried and enforced by the height of the block here: 4af01b37d4/src/validation.cpp (L1889)
P.S. This is also quite confusing: 4af01b37d4/src/validation.cpp (L1560-L1563) But seems to be intentional: 4af01b37d4/src/validation.cpp (L1510-L1511)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 4c825792dd9f4eaf4936c3e376ac7a5c177528e2
Tree-SHA512: 7afbbae84ed4ecfaa0a273ae024b14f2b7ffe65307f078086fe0b5b645c57722bc2952fb15d167d9e4fa5b052d1d0ac6e5e33f57e8fc881c0ea611d352bccc1e
7d0f80b Use anonymous namespace instead of static functions (Pieter Wuille)
b61fb71 Mention removal of bare multisig IsMine in release notes (Pieter Wuille)
9c2a8b8 Do not treat bare multisig as IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
08f3228 Optimization: only test for witness scripts at top level (Pieter Wuille)
3619735 Track difference between scriptPubKey and P2SH execution in IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
ac6ec62 Switch to a private version of SigVersion inside IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
19fc973 Do not expose SigVersion argument to IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
fb1dfbb Remove unused IsMine overload (Pieter Wuille)
952d821 Make CScript -> CScriptID conversion explicit (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Currently our wallet code will treat bare multisig outputs (meaning scriptPubKeys with multiple public keys + `OP_CHECKMULTISIG` operator in it) as ours without the user asking for it, as long as all private keys in it are in our wallet.
This is a pointless feature. As it only works when all private keys are in one place, it's useless compared to single key outputs (P2PK, P2PKH, P2WPKH, P2SH-P2WPKH), and worse in terms of space, cost, UTXO size, and ability to test (due to lack of address format for them).
Furthermore, they are problematic in that producing a list of all `scriptPubKeys` we accept is not tractable (it involves all combinations of all public keys that are ours). In further wallet changes I'd like to move to a model where all scriptPubKeys that are treated as ours are explicit, rather than defined by whatever keys we have. The current behavior of the wallet is very hard to model in such a design, so I'd like to get rid of it.
I think there are two options:
* Remove it entirely (do not ever accept bare multisig outputs as ours, unless watched)
* Only accept bare multisig outputs in situations where the P2SH version of that output would also be acceptable
This PR implements the first option. The second option was explored in #12874.
Tree-SHA512: 917ed45b3cac864cee53e27f9a3e900390c576277fbd6751b1250becea04d692b3b426fa09065a3399931013bd579c4f3dbeeb29d51d19ed0c64da75d430ad9a
* scripted-diff: Replace #include "" with #include <> (ryanofsky)
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
for f in \
src/*.cpp \
src/*.h \
src/bench/*.cpp \
src/bench/*.h \
src/compat/*.cpp \
src/compat/*.h \
src/consensus/*.cpp \
src/consensus/*.h \
src/crypto/*.cpp \
src/crypto/*.h \
src/crypto/ctaes/*.h \
src/policy/*.cpp \
src/policy/*.h \
src/primitives/*.cpp \
src/primitives/*.h \
src/qt/*.cpp \
src/qt/*.h \
src/qt/test/*.cpp \
src/qt/test/*.h \
src/rpc/*.cpp \
src/rpc/*.h \
src/script/*.cpp \
src/script/*.h \
src/support/*.cpp \
src/support/*.h \
src/support/allocators/*.h \
src/test/*.cpp \
src/test/*.h \
src/wallet/*.cpp \
src/wallet/*.h \
src/wallet/test/*.cpp \
src/wallet/test/*.h \
src/zmq/*.cpp \
src/zmq/*.h
do
base=${f%/*}/ relbase=${base#src/} sed -i "s:#include \"\(.*\)\"\(.*\):if test -e \$base'\\1'; then echo \"#include <\"\$relbase\"\\1>\\2\"; else echo \"#include <\\1>\\2\"; fi:e" $f
done
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* scripted-diff: Replace #include "" with #include <> (Dash Specific)
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
for f in \
src/bls/*.cpp \
src/bls/*.h \
src/evo/*.cpp \
src/evo/*.h \
src/governance/*.cpp \
src/governance/*.h \
src/llmq/*.cpp \
src/llmq/*.h \
src/masternode/*.cpp \
src/masternode/*.h \
src/privatesend/*.cpp \
src/privatesend/*.h
do
base=${f%/*}/ relbase=${base#src/} sed -i "s:#include \"\(.*\)\"\(.*\):if test -e \$base'\\1'; then echo \"#include <\"\$relbase\"\\1>\\2\"; else echo \"#include <\\1>\\2\"; fi:e" $f
done
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* build: Remove -I for everything but project root
Remove -I from build system for everything but the project root,
and built-in dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
# Conflicts:
# src/Makefile.test.include
* qt: refactor: Use absolute include paths in .ui files
* qt: refactor: Changes to make include paths absolute
This makes all include paths in the GUI absolute.
Many changes are involved as every single source file in
src/qt/ assumes to be able to use relative includes.
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
# Conflicts:
# src/qt/dash.cpp
# src/qt/optionsmodel.cpp
# src/qt/test/rpcnestedtests.cpp
* test: refactor: Use absolute include paths for test data files
* Recommend #include<> syntax in developer notes
* refactor: Include obj/build.h instead of build.h
* END BACKPORT #11651 Remove trailing whitespace causing travis failure
* fix backport 11651
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* More of 11651
* fix blockchain.cpp
Signed-off-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* Add missing "qt/" in includes
* Add missing "test/" in includes
* Fix trailing whitespaces
Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
Co-authored-by: MeshCollider <dobsonsa68@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
* Merge #11117: Prepare for non-Base58 addresses
864cd2787 Move CBitcoinAddress to base58.cpp (Pieter Wuille)
5c8ff0d44 Introduce wrappers around CBitcoinAddress (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This patch removes the need for the intermediary Base58 type `CBitcoinAddress`, by providing {`Encode`,`Decode`,`IsValid`}`Destination` functions that directly operate on the conversion between `std::string`s and `CTxDestination`.
As a side, it also fixes a number of indentation issues, and removes probably several unnecessary implicit `CTxDestination`<->`CBitcoinAddress` conversions.
This change is far from complete. In follow-ups I'd like to:
* Split off the specific address and key encoding logic from base58.h, and move it to a address.h or so.
* Replace `CTxDestination` with a non-`boost::variant` version (which can be more efficient as `boost::variant` allocates everything on the heap, and remove the need for `boost::get<...>` and `IsValidDestination` calls everywhere).
* Do the same for `CBitcoinSecret`, `CBitcoinExtKey`, and `CBitcoinExtPubKey`.
However, I've tried to keep this patch to be minimally invasive, but still enough to support non-Base58 addresses. Perhaps a smaller patch is possible to hack Bech32 support into `CBitcoinAddress`, but I would consider that a move in the wrong direction.
Tree-SHA512: c2c77ffb57caeadf2429b1c2562ce60e8c7be8aa9f8e51b591f354b6b441162625b2efe14c023a1ae485cf2ed417263afa35c892891dfaa7844e7fbabccab85e
* CBitcoinAddress -> EncodeDestination in providertx.h
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* more CBitcoinAddress -> EncodeDestination in providertx.h
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* more CBitcoinAddress -> EncodeDestination in providertx.h
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* more CBitcoinAddress -> EncodeDestination in providertx.h
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* fix CBitcoinAddress GetKeyID check
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* fix providertx.cpp
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* hopefully fix governance-classes.cpp
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* partially fix governance-validators.cpp, unable to resolve "address.IsScript()"
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* partially fix governance-classes.cpp, unable to resolve "address.IsScript()"
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* fix governance-classes.h
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* DecodeTransaction -> DecodeDestination, fix governance-validators.cpp
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
* More fixes for 3294
* Move GetIndexKey into rpc/misc.cpp near getAddressesFromParams
No need to have it in base58.cpp anymore as this is only used in getAddressesFromParams
Co-authored-by: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander Block <ablock84@gmail.com>
360b464 Comments: More comments on functions/globals in standard.h. (Jim Posen)
Pull request description:
I was confused about what "data carrier" meant, so I wanted to comment the `fAcceptDatacarrier` and `nMaxDatacarrierBytes` fields specifically. Then I figured I'd add docs for the rest of the functions.
Tree-SHA512: e6d0cfe6f4a2ab52ae76f984b1f5d8de371ae938e7832be8b02517d868f1caea62fec8888c917a2bd3d8ef74025de7f00dc96923fa56436dc6b190626652bf29
remove witness
Signed-off-by: Pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
Previously only one PUSHDATA was allowed, needlessly limiting
applications such as matching OP_RETURN contents with bloom filters that
operate on a per-PUSHDATA level. Now any combination that passes
IsPushOnly() is allowed, so long as the total size of the scriptPubKey
is less than 42 bytes. (unchanged modulo non-minimal PUSHDATA encodings)
Also, this fixes the odd bug where previously the PUSHDATA could be
replaced by any single opcode, even sigops consuming opcodes such as
CHECKMULTISIG. (20 sigops!)
Transactions that fail CLTV verification will be rejected from the
mempool, making it easy to test the feature. However blocks containing
"invalid" CLTV-using transactions will still be accepted; this is *not*
the soft-fork required to actually enable CLTV for production use.
NOP1 to NOP10 are reserved for future soft-fork upgrades. In the event
of an upgrade such NOPs have *VERIFY behavior, meaning that if their
arguments are not correct the script fails. Discouraging these NOPs by
rejecting transactions containing them from the mempool ensures that
we'll never accept transactions, nor mine blocks, with scripts that are
now invalid according to the majority of hashing power even if we're not
yet upgraded. Previously this wasn't an issue as the IsStandard() rules
didn't allow upgradable NOPs anyway, but 7f3b4e95 relaxed the
IsStandard() rules for P2SH redemptions allowing any redeemScript to be
spent.
We *do* allow upgradable NOPs in scripts so long as they are not
executed. This is harmless as there is no opportunity for the script to
be invalid post-upgrade.
This allows for a reversal of the current behavior.
This:
CScript foo;
CScriptID bar(foo.GetID());
Becomes:
CScript foo;
CScriptID bar(foo);
This way, CScript is no longer dependent on CScriptID or Hash();
