## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Let GUI users control all CJ params (on the fly) without the need to
edit `dash.conf`.
<img width="643" alt="Screenshot 2023-08-27 at 12 29 07"
src="https://github.com/dashpay/dash/assets/1935069/2d90db0d-c7b2-43a9-9f7f-1c4ad9517408">
## What was done?
Add 3 corresponding spin boxes in Options (with a simple sanity check).
I tried my best to come up with the least confusing labels/tooltips for
these, not sure if I'm 100% happy with the result though.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run qt wallet, play with values and make sure they are saved/loaded/used
in mixing correctly.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
In case MNs didn't submit their own trigger, should vote for funding yes
when receiving triggers from other nodes.
## What was done?
Check if already submitted theirs and vote accordingly.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## What was done?
- remove dependency of Asset Lock txes on CCreditPool
- new case for functional tests of Asset Locks - more than one output
for Asset Lock tx.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
Slightly changes behaviour of TxMempool. Tx can be accepted in mempool
even if Asset Unlock transaction with same index is already mined. But
final consensus rules are same.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Since #5525, MNs during the maturity window, will propose new triggers.
In `CGovernanceManager::CreateSuperblockCandidate`, SuperBlock creation
is skipped when the bellow check is true:
`if (nHeight % Params().GetConsensus().nSuperblockCycle <
Params().GetConsensus().nSuperblockCycle -
Params().GetConsensus().nSuperblockMaturityWindow) return std::nullopt;
`
Hence, the value of `nSuperblockMaturityWindow` must be less than
`nSuperblockCycle` and greater than 0.
## What was done?
Changed `nSuperblockMaturityWindow` for devnet and Testnet chain
parameters to the following values:
`nSuperblockCycle` = 24
`nSuperblockMaturityWindow` = 8
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
With #5525 , MNs shouldn't use Sentinel anymore.
## What was done?
In order to force them to remove Sentinel:
- `gobject submit` RPC won't accept triggers anymore.
- `gobject vote-conf` RPC isn't available anymore.
## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_governance.py` and `feature_governance_object.py`
## Breaking Changes
Normally, only Sentinel should be broken.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
a1d5b12ec07d2f7aa9fa955a6dd99e8a2be5cb25 Merge getreceivedby tally into GetReceived function (Andrew Toth)
Pull request description:
This PR merges the tally code of `getreceivedbyaddress` and `getreceivedbylabel` into a single function `GetReceived`. This reduces repeated code and makes it similar to `listreceivedbyaddress` and `listreceivedbylabel`, which use the function `ListReceived`. It will also make the change in #14707 simpler and easier to review.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
re-ACK a1d5b12ec0
meshcollider:
utACK a1d5b12ec07d2f7aa9fa955a6dd99e8a2be5cb25
Tree-SHA512: 43d9cd92f7c2c6a8b9c7509aa85a9b9233a6cfec1c43a9062e3bdfb83515413d1feafa8938c828351278ba22bd31c47e62ab5341e4bddc2493103b094d73b047
6f8b498d186df5aa08dbb9ca8fdeab6652f1db5e fuzz: http_request workaround for libevent < 2.1.1 (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The fuzz test `http_request` calls the following two internal libevent functions:
* `evhttp_parse_firstline_`
* `evhttp_parse_headers_`
Before libevent 2.1.1 however, internal functions names didn't end with an underscore (see libevent commit 8ac3c4c25b and [Changelog for 2.1.1.-alpha](https://github.com/libevent/libevent/blob/master/ChangeLog#L1830) when the change was first mentioned) hence the build fails with a linking error.
This PR adds a preprocessor workaround to the test that checks for the libevent version (via ~`_EVENT_NUMERIC_VERSION`~ `LIBEVENT_VERSION_NUMBER`) and creates wrapper functions mapping to naming scheme without underscore in case the version is older than 2.1.1.
Tested with Ubuntu Xenial 16.04.6 LTS and clang-8.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 6f8b498d186df5aa08dbb9ca8fdeab6652f1db5e, tested on xenial:
Tree-SHA512: 3b9e0147b8aea22e417d418e3b6d4905f5be131c2b0ae4b0f8b9411c5606d2e22f1b23e1ecc6980ecab907c61404de09e588aae1ac43cf70cf9e8d006bbdee73
fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef test: Move boost/stdlib includes last (MarcoFalke)
fa488f131fd4f5bab0d01376c5a5013306f1abcd scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers (MarcoFalke)
fac5c373006a9e4bcbb56843bb85f1aca4d87599 scripted-diff: Sort test includes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When writing tests, often includes need to be added or removed. Currently the list of includes is not sorted, so developers that write tests and have `clang-format` installed will either have an unrelated change (sorting) included in their commit or they will have to manually undo the sort.
This pull preempts both issues by just sorting all includes in one commit.
Please be aware that this is **NOT** a change to policy to enforce clang-format or any other developer guideline or process. Developers are free to use whatever tool they want, see also #18651.
Edit: Also includes a commit to bump the copyright headers, so that the touched files don't need to be touched again for that.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fa4632c41714dfaa699bacc6a947d72668a4deef
jonatack:
ACK fa4632c41714dfaa, light review and sanity checks with gcc build and clang fuzz build
Tree-SHA512: 130a8d073a379ba556b1e64104d37c46b671425c0aef0ed725fd60156a95e8dc83fb6f0b5330b2f8152cf5daaf3983b4aca5e75812598f2626c39fd12b88b180
01a3392b1b778fa4fcf568013326d6ea1de4fb3b Drop bitcoin-wallet dependency on libevent (Russell Yanofsky)
0660119ac372c2863d14060ac1bc9bc243771f94 Drop unintended bitcoin-tx dependency on libevent (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This fixes compile errors trying to build bitcoin-tx and bitcoin-wallet without libevent, which were reported by Luke Dashjr in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18465
The fix avoiding `bitcoin-tx` dependency on libevent just adds a conditional build rule. This is implemented in the first commit (more details in commit description).
The fix avoiding `bitcoin-wallet` dependency on libevent requires minor code changes, because `bitcoin-wallet` (unlike `bitcoin-tx`) links against code that calls `urlDecode` / `evhttp_uridecode`. This fix is implemented in the second commit (again details in the commit description).
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 01a3392b1b778fa4fcf568013326d6ea1de4fb3b.
Tree-SHA512: d2245e912ab494cccceeb427a1eca8e55b01a0006ff93eebcfb5461ae7cecd1083ac2de443d9db036b18bdc6f0fb615546caaa20c585046f66d234937f74870a
ef712298c3f8bc2afdad783f05080443b72b3f77 util: Check for file being NULL in DirectoryCommit (Luke Dashjr)
457490403853321d308c6ca6aaa90d6f8f29b4cf Fix possible data race when committing block files (Evan Klitzke)
220bb16cbee5b91d0bc0fcc6c71560d631295fa5 util: Introduce DirectoryCommit commit function to sync a directory (Evan Klitzke)
ce5cbaea63ad4ea78e533bdb14f47f414061ae7f util.h: Document FileCommit function (Evan Klitzke)
844d650eea3bd809884cc5dd996a388bdc58314e util: Prefer Mac-specific F_FULLSYNC over fdatasync in FileCommit (Evan Klitzke)
f6cec0bcaf560fa310853ad3fe17022602b63d5f util: Refactor FileCommit from an #if sequence nested in #else, to a sequence of #elif (Evan Klitzke)
Pull request description:
Reviving #12696
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK ef712298c3f8bc2afdad783f05080443b72b3f77
Tree-SHA512: 07d650990ef4c18d645dee3f9a199a940683ad17557d79d93979a76c4e710d8d70e6eae01d1a5991494a24a7654eb7db868be0c34a31e70b2509945d95bc9cce
31b136e5802e1b1e5f9a9589736afe0652f34da2 Don't declare de facto const reference variables as non-const (practicalswift)
1c65c075ee4c7f98d9c1fac5ed7576b96374d4e9 Don't declare de facto const member functions as non-const (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
_Meta: This is the second and final part of the `const` refactoring series (part one: #20581). **I promise: no more refactoring PRs from me in a while! :)** I'll now go back to focusing on fuzzing/hardening!_
Changes in this PR:
* Don't declare de facto const member functions as non-const
* Don't declare de facto const reference variables as non-const
Awards for finding candidates for the above changes go to:
* `clang-tidy`'s [`readability-make-member-function-const`](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/readability-make-member-function-const.html) check ([list of `clang-tidy` checks](https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/list.html))
* `cppcheck`'s `constVariable` check ([list of `cppcheck` checks](https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/wiki/ListOfChecks/))
See #18920 for instructions on how to analyse Bitcoin Core using Clang Static Analysis, `clang-tidy` and `cppcheck`.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK 31b136e5802e1b1e5f9a9589736afe0652f34da2
jonatack:
ACK 31b136e5802e1b1e5f9a9589736afe0652f34da2
theStack:
ACK 31b136e5802e1b1e5f9a9589736afe0652f34da2 ❄️
Tree-SHA512: f58f8f00744219426874379e9f3e9331132b9b48e954d24f3a85cbb858fdcc98009ed42ef7e7b4619ae8af9fc240a6d8bfc1c438db2e97b0ecd722a80dcfeffe
faec0638872798b58b9882ee079014555bc8393e log: Use Join() helper when listing log categories (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This removes the global `ListLogCategories` and replaces it with a one-line member function `LogCategoriesString`, which just calls `Join`.
Should be a straightforward refactor to get rid of a few LOC.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK faec0638872798b58b9882ee079014555bc8393e
promag:
ACK faec0638872798b58b9882ee079014555bc8393e, I also think it's fine as it is (re https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18669#discussion_r412944724).
Tree-SHA512: 2f51f9ce1246eda5630015f3a869e36953c7eb34f311baad576b92d7829e4e88051c6189436271cd0a13732a49698506345b446b98fd28e58edfb5b62169f1c9
378aedc45248cea82d9a3e6dc1038d6828008a76 [net] Add cs_vSend lock annotations (John Newbery)
673254515a2f97e53dd8c7335c836b083ba7e31a [net] Move RecordBytesSent() call out of cs_vSend lock (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
RecordBytesSent() does not require cs_vSend to be locked, so reduce the scope of cs_vSend.
Also correctly annotate the CNode data members that are guarded by cs_vSend.
This is a simpler alternative to #19673.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ok, reverting to commit 378aedc which has two ACKs already. Any style issues can be fixed up in future PRs.
troygiorshev:
ACK 378aedc45248cea82d9a3e6dc1038d6828008a76
theStack:
re-ACK 378aedc45248cea82d9a3e6dc1038d6828008a76
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 378aedc45248cea82d9a3e6dc1038d6828008a76 🔌
Tree-SHA512: e9cd6c472b7e1479120c1bf2d1c640cf6d18c7d589a5f9b7dfc4875e5790adaab403a7a1b945a47e79e7249a614b8583270e4549f89b22e8a9edb2e4818b0d07
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
When building with `-Wreorder-ctor` capture, the build fails with
`error: field 'lastMNListForVotingKeys' will be initialized after field
'votedFundingYesTriggerHash'`
## What was done?
Moved down `votedFundingYesTriggerHash` to last position in
`CGovernanceManager`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
no
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Implementation of issue https://github.com/dashpay/dash-issues/issues/43
## What was done?
Masternode will try to create, sign and submit a Superblock (GovTrigger)
during the `nSuperblockMaturityWindow`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <6443210+PastaPastaPasta@users.noreply.github.com>
0000a0c7e9e4e7c1afafe6ef75b7624f4c573190 Remove confusing and almost useless "unexpected version" warning (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It is useless because it isn't displayed for most users:
* It isn't displayed in normal operation (because the validation debug category is disabled by default)
* It isn't displayed for users that sync up their nodes intermittently, e.g. once a day or once a week (because it is disabled for IBD)
* It is only displayed in the debug log (as opposed to the versionbits warning, which is displayed more prominently)
It is confusing because it doesn't have a use case:
Despite the above, if a user *did* see the warning, it would most likely be a false positive (like it has been in the past). Even if it wasn't, there is nothing they can do about it. The only thing they could do is to check for updates and hope that a fixed version is available. But why would the user be so scrupulously precise in enabling the warning and reading the log, but then fail to regularly check update channels for updated software?
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 0000a0c7e9e4e7c1afafe6ef75b7624f4c573190
decryp2kanon:
ACK 0000a0c
LarryRuane:
ACK 0000a0c7e9e4e7c1afafe6ef75b7624f4c573190
Tree-SHA512: 16e069c84be6ab6034baeefdc515d0e5cdf560b2005d2faec5f989d45494bd16cfcb4ffca6a17211d9556ae44f9737a60a476c08b5c2bb5e1bd29724ecd6d5c1
e5faec65bd06a3b14175aca3040290f343bd6e9c doc: Fix doxygen comment silent merge conflict in descriptor.cpp (W. J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
It looks like #21238 introduced a silent merge conflict in the documentation, which fails with `-Wdocumentation` in the CI.
(please merge only if CI passes)
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK e5faec65bd06a3b14175aca3040290f343bd6e9c -- fixed it for me
meshcollider:
ACK e5faec65bd06a3b14175aca3040290f343bd6e9c modulo CI
Tree-SHA512: b07d50fd12aa7c239a92aad8ef29f4e88583c3ce701ebedba7c426aac4981c79113adc4670b7d055ab9535a28bdc3f9a30e6ca1b1ed0d7b9a333a3d9c4b40d8a
4eca20d6f7d850492d331d89d1cdd77abb3c70c1 [doc] correct comment about ATMPW (glozow)
8fa74aeb5b96419c7d40b40f8e1e1269509278e2 [doc] correct comment in chainparams (glozow)
2f8272c2a4b6fa84c04dfeb4d751bb218f2d4c78 [doc] GetBestBlock() doesn't do nothing (gzhao408)
Pull request description:
Came across a few misleading comments, wanted to fix them
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 4eca20d6f7
MarcoFalke:
ACK 4eca20d6f7d850492d331d89d1cdd77abb3c70c1
laanwj:
Code review ACK 4eca20d6f7d850492d331d89d1cdd77abb3c70c1
Tree-SHA512: 5bef1f1e7703f304128cf0eb8945e139e031580c99062bbbe15bf4db8443c2ba5a8c65844833132e6646c8980c678fc1d2ab0c63e17105585d583570ee350fd0
ebde946a527e50630df180c6565ea5bf8d2ab5aa [doc] Improve comment about protected peers (Amiti Uttarwar)
Pull request description:
The comment currently suggests a long-standing node would infrequently protect peers under normal circumstances. Clarify that we also protect peers that are synced to the same work as our chain tip. [Relevant check here](ee0dc02c6f/src/net_processing.cpp (L1997)).
ACKs for top commit:
Empact:
ACK ebde946a52
jnewbery:
ACK ebde946a527e50630df180c6565ea5bf8d2ab5aa
Tree-SHA512: 3692f4098e95f935d801e0ee6bbd3a7c9480e66ca070a7c68ba79c4fc2e62377f5d37080c7b6a7d15ab617aaf4d3df9b26abc4f1b090d572ba46fdd092a6a64a
6f2c4fd0775a9c45eacc4bab8f138528852fdf44 netinfo: add user help documentation (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This is the help doc commit of #20764 without the rest of the PR or anything new since the 0.21.0 branch-off in order to target giving users a -netinfo help doc for 0.21.
- to test the new help
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli -netinfo help
```
- to see the updated short help
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli -help | grep -A4 netinfo
```
<details><summary><code>-netinfo</code> help doc</summary><p>
```
$ ./src/bitcoin-cli -netinfo help
-netinfo level "help"
Returns a network peer connections dashboard with information from the remote server.
Under the hood, -netinfo fetches the data by calling getpeerinfo and getnetworkinfo.
An optional integer argument from 0 to 4 can be passed for different peers listings.
Pass "help" to see this detailed help documentation.
If more than one argument is passed, only the first one is read and parsed.
Suggestion: use with the Linux watch(1) command for a live dashboard; see example below.
Arguments:
1. level (integer 0-4, optional) Specify the info level of the peers dashboard (default 0):
0 - Connection counts and local addresses
1 - Like 0 but with a peers listing (without address or version columns)
2 - Like 1 but with an address column
3 - Like 1 but with a version column
4 - Like 1 but with both address and version columns
2. help (string "help", optional) Print this help documentation instead of the dashboard.
Result:
* The peers listing in levels 1-4 displays all of the peers sorted by direction and minimum ping time:
Column Description
------ -----------
<-> Direction
"in" - inbound connections are those initiated by the peer
"out" - outbound connections are those initiated by us
type Type of peer connection
"full" - full relay, the default
"block" - block relay; like full relay but does not relay transactions or addresses
net Network the peer connected through ("ipv4", "ipv6", "onion", "i2p", or "cjdns")
mping Minimum observed ping time, in milliseconds (ms)
ping Last observed ping time, in milliseconds (ms)
send Time since last message sent to the peer, in seconds
recv Time since last message received from the peer, in seconds
txn Time since last novel transaction received from the peer and accepted into our mempool, in minutes
blk Time since last novel block passing initial validity checks received from the peer, in minutes
age Duration of connection to the peer, in minutes
asmap Mapped AS (Autonomous System) number in the BGP route to the peer, used for diversifying
peer selection (only displayed if the -asmap config option is set)
id Peer index, in increasing order of peer connections since node startup
address IP address and port of the peer
version Peer version and subversion concatenated, e.g. "70016/Satoshi:21.0.0/"
* The connection counts table displays the number of peers by direction, network, and the totals
for each, as well as a column for block relay peers.
* The local addresses table lists each local address broadcast by the node, the port, and the score.
Examples:
Connection counts and local addresses only
> bitcoin-cli -netinfo
Compact peers listing
> bitcoin-cli -netinfo 1
Full dashboard
> bitcoin-cli -netinfo 4
Full live dashboard, adjust --interval or --no-title as needed (Linux)
> watch --interval 1 --no-title ./src/bitcoin-cli -netinfo 4
See this help
> bitcoin-cli -netinfo help
```
</p></details>
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 6f2c4fd0775a9c45eacc4bab8f138528852fdf44
Tree-SHA512: dd49b1ce65546dacfb8ba9f9d57de0eae55560fd05533cf26c0b5d6ec65bf1de789c3287e90a0e2f47707532fab2fe62919a4192a7ffd58ac8eec18293e9aaeb
e6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729 rpc: Improve avoidpartialspends and avoid_reuse documentation (Fabian Jahr)
8f073076b102b77897e5a025ae555baae3d1f671 wallet: Increase OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #17824.
This increases OUTPUT_GROUP_MAX_ENTRIES to 100 which means that OutputGroups will now be up to 100 outputs large, up from previously 10. The main motivation for this change is that during the PR review club on #17824 [several participants signaled](https://bitcoincore.reviews/17824.html#l-339) that 100 might be a better value here.
I think fees should be manageable for users but more importantly, users should know what they can expect when using the wallet with this configuration, so I also tried to clarify the documentation on `-avoidpartialspends` and `avoid_reuse` a bit. If there are other additional ways how or docs where users can be made aware of the potential consequences of using these parameters, please let me know. Another small upside is that [there seem to be a high number of batching transactions with 100 and 200 inputs](https://miro.medium.com/max/3628/1*sZ5eaBSbsJsHx-J9iztq2g.png)([source](https://medium.com/@hasufly/an-analysis-of-batching-in-bitcoin-9bdf81a394e0)) giving these transactions a bit of a larger anonymity set, although that is probably a very weak argument.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK e6fe1c37d0
Xekyo:
retACK e6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729
rajarshimaitra:
tACK `e6fe1c3`
achow101:
ACK e6fe1c37d0a2f8037996dd80619d6c23ec028729
glozow:
code review ACK e6fe1c37d0
Tree-SHA512: 79685c58bafa64ed8303b0ecd616fce50fc9a2b758aa79833e4ad9f15760e09ab60c007bc16ab4cbc4222e644cfd154f1fa494b0f3a5d86faede7af33a6f2826
3d552b0d788a7d3102396b32d0de08e57cbfd297 [doc] explain why CheckBlock() is called before AcceptBlock() (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Based on https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2019-February/016697.html and its PDF attachment.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 3d552b0d788a7d3102396b32d0de08e57cbfd297
Tree-SHA512: d1ef39855317853e0e7e051ec6015054d0d227fcdf20281c2c1921056537f1f79044aa1bdd35f46475edd17596fbcae79aeb338c4865b1269a01b158f6cb2ac4
8c09c0c1d18885ef94f79b3f2d073f43269bc95d fuzz: Avoid time-based "non-determinism" in fuzzing harnesses by using mocked GetTime() (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Avoid time-based "non-determinism" in fuzzing harnesses by using mocked `GetTime()`.
Prior to this commit the fuzzing harnesses `banman`, `connman`, `net` and `rbf` had time-based "non-determinism". `addrman` is fixed in #20425. `process_message` and `process_messages` are left to fix: simply using mock time is not enough for them due to interaction with `IsInitialBlockDownload()`.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8c09c0c1d18885ef94f79b3f2d073f43269bc95d
practicalswift:
> review ACK [8c09c0c](8c09c0c1d1)
Tree-SHA512: 32dfbead3dfd18cf4ff56dc2ea341aa977441b4e19a54879cf54fa5820c7e2b14b92c7e238d32fd785654f3b28cc82826ae66c03e94c292633c63c41196ba9a8
fabce459bb44e90dc7ae9c44eeedab707435af5b fuzz: version handshake (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Not fuzzing the version handshake will limit fuzz coverage
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fabce459bb44e90dc7ae9c44eeedab707435af5b: patch looks very much correct
Tree-SHA512: 4091d27d39edee781d033e471b352084bb54df250d0890e4821a325926a44dff9b26a2614d67dd0529f73bd366b075d7a0a1a570c2837de286a1b93a59a8fb91
ba7e17e073f833eccd4c7c111ae9058c3f123371 rpc, test: document {previous,next}blockhash as optional (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR updates the result help of the following RPCs w.r.t. the `previousblockhash` and `nextblockhash` fields:
- getblockheader
- getblock
Also adds trivial tests on genesis block (should not contain "previousblockhash") and best block (should not contain "nextblockhash").
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: ef42c5c773fc436e1b4a67be14e2532e800e1e30e45e54a57431c6abb714d2c069c70d40ea4012d549293b823a1973b3f569484b3273679683b28ed40abf46bb
5e531e6beb5381c0be5efaa24b7e423e593568e4 assumptions: check C++17 assumption with MSVC (fanquake)
c7b46489f8c4d880382248fb47266d81948bbce0 assumptions: assume a C++17 compiler (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This has been the case since #20413.
This should also enable the check for MSVC. From my reading of https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/zc-cplusplus?view=msvc-160 and https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/msvc-now-correctly-reports-__cplusplus/ if we set the `/Zc:__cplusplus` switch in additional options, MSVC will report the correct value for `__cplusplus`. However I have not tested this.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5e531e6beb5381c0be5efaa24b7e423e593568e4
hebasto:
ACK 5e531e6beb5381c0be5efaa24b7e423e593568e4, checked the MS docs, and AppVeyor build is green.
practicalswift:
ACK 5e531e6beb5381c0be5efaa24b7e423e593568e4
Tree-SHA512: a4fb525cf5c33abc944c614edb0313a39c8a39a1637a03c09342c15ba0925f4eb037062e65e51b42ade667506b7e554c7159acf86e6b8c35d0a87dd79a6f239b
ae98aec9c0521cdcec76459c8200bd45ff6a1485 refactor: Make CAddrMan::cs non-recursive (Hennadii Stepanov)
f5d1c7fac70f424114dae3be270fdc31589a8c34 Add AssertLockHeld to CAddrMan private functions (Hennadii Stepanov)
5ef1d0b6982f05f70ff2164ab9af1ac1d2f97f5d Add thread safety annotations to CAddrMan public functions (Hennadii Stepanov)
b138973a8b4bbe061ad97011f278a21e08ea79e6 refactor: Avoid recursive locking in CAddrMan::Clear (Hennadii Stepanov)
f79a664314b88941c1a2796623e846d0a5916c06 refactor: Apply consistent pattern for CAddrMan::Check usage (Hennadii Stepanov)
187b7d2bb36e6de9cd960378021ebe690619a2ef refactor: Avoid recursive locking in CAddrMan::Check (Hennadii Stepanov)
f77d9c79aa41dab4285e95c9432cc6d853be67a3 refactor: Fix CAddrMan::Check style (Hennadii Stepanov)
06703973c758c2c5d0ff916993aa7055f609d2d7 Make CAddrMan::Check private (Hennadii Stepanov)
efc6fac951e75ba913350bb470c3d4e6a4e284b9 refactor: Avoid recursive locking in CAddrMan::size (Hennadii Stepanov)
2da95545ea42f925dbc7703e42e9356908a8c83e test: Drop excessive locking in CAddrManTest::SimConnFail (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
This PR replaces `RecursiveMutex CAddrMan::cs` with `Mutex CAddrMan::cs`.
All of the related code branches are covered by appropriate lock assertions to insure that the mutex locking policy has not been changed by accident.
Related to #19303.
Based on #22025, and first three commits belong to it.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK ae98aec9c0521cdcec76459c8200bd45ff6a1485
Tree-SHA512: c3a2d3d955a75befd7e497a802b8c10730e393be9111ca263ad0464d32fae6c7edf9bd173ffb6bc9bb61c4b39073a74eba12979d47f26b0b7b4a861d100942df
3e68efa615968e0c9d68a7f197c7852478f6be78 [net] Move checks from GetLocalAddrForPeer to caller (John Newbery)
d21d2b264cd77c027a06f68289cf4c3f177d1ed0 [net] Change AdvertiseLocal to GetLocalAddrForPeer (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This is the first part of #21186. It slightly disentangles addr handling in net/net_processing by making it explicit that net_processing is responsible for pushing addr records into `vAddrToSend`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 3e68efa615968e0c9d68a7f197c7852478f6be78 🍅
Tree-SHA512: 9af50c41f5a977e2e277f24a589db38e2980b353401def5e74b108ac5f493d9b5d6b1b8bf15323a4d66321495f04bc271450fcef7aa7d1c095f051a4f8e9b15f
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Unlike bitcoin we are using PREVIOUS block in `GetBlockSubsidy()`.
That creates special case for genesis block, because it doesn't have
previous block. In this special case instead of calling
`GetBlockSubsidy` should be used pre-calculated value. To avoid
confusion for new code and simplify implementation, there's introduced a
new method `GetBlockSubsidyPrev` that has other interface: it takes
pointer `CBlockIndex* prev` in agruments instead pair of height + nbits.
These changes are follow-up for #5501
## What was done?
Implemented new method `GetBlockSubsidyPrev()` and used instead of
`GetBlockSubsidy` when it is more convenient.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix buid errors like https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/4933232262
## What was done?
reorder initializations
## How Has This Been Tested?
local build with `-werror`
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
a9ecbdfcaa15499644d16e9c8ad2c63dfc45b37b test: add more inactive filter tests to p2p_filter.py (Sebastian Falbesoner)
5eae034996b340c19cebab9efb6c89d20fe051ef net: limit BIP37 filter lifespan (active between 'filterload' and 'filterclear') (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18483. On the master branch, there is currently _always_ a BIP37 filter set for every peer: if not a specific filter is set through a `filterload` message, a default match-everything filter is instanciated and pointed to via the `CBloomFilter` default constructor; that happens both initially, when the containing structure `TxRelay` is constructed:
c0b389b335/src/net.h (L812)
and after a loaded filter is removed again through a `filterclear` message:
c0b389b335/src/net_processing.cpp (L3201)
The behaviour was introduced by commit 37c6389c5a (an intentional covert fix for [CVE-2013-5700](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18515), according to gmaxwell).
This default match-everything filter leads to some unintended side-effects:
1. `getdata` request for filtered blocks (i.e. type `MSG_FILTERED_BLOCK`) are always responded to with `merkleblock`s, even if no filter was set by the peer, see issue #18483 (strictly speaking, this is a violation of BIP37) c0b389b335/src/net_processing.cpp (L1504-L1507)
2. if a peer sends a `filteradd` message without having loaded a filter via `filterload` before, the intended increasing of the banscore never happens (triggered if `bad` is set to true, a few lines below) c0b389b335/src/net_processing.cpp (L3182-L3186)
This PR basically activates the `else`-branch code paths for all checks of `pfilter` again (on the master branch, they are dead code) by limiting the pointer's lifespan: instead of always having a filter set, the `pfilter` is only pointing to a `CBloomFilter`-instance after receiving a `filterload` message and the instance is destroyed again (and the pointer nullified) after receiving a `filterclear` message.
Here is a before/after comparison in behaviour:
| code part / scenario | master branch | PR branch |
| --------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |
| `getdata` processing for `MSG_FILTERED_BLOCK` | always responds with `merkleblock` | only responds if filter was set via `filterload` |
| `filteradd` processing, no filter was loaded | nothing | peer's banscore increases by 100 (i.e. disconnect) |
On the other code parts where `pfilter` is checked there is no change in the logic behaviour (except that `CBloomFilter::IsRelevantAndUpdate()` is unnecessarily called and immediately returned in the master branch).
Note that the default constructor of `CBloomFilter` is only used for deserializing the received `filterload` message and nowhere else. The PR also contains a functional test checking that sending `getdata` for filtered blocks is ignored by the node if no bloom filter is set.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK a9ecbdfcaa, only change is in test code 🕙
Tree-SHA512: 1a656a6d74ccaf628e7fdca063ba63fbab2089e0b6d0a11be9bbd387c2ee6d3230706ff8ffc1a55711481df3d4547137dd7c9d9184d89eaa43ade4927792d0b6
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
The order of members in a class/struct definition and the order of their
initialization should match. This ensures that the code is more
error-proof in cases where the order of member initializations is
important, as they may depend on each other.
Instead manual checking of member initialization better let CI handle
it.
Last PR where it's noticed:
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5531#discussion_r1299404387
## What was done?
New flag "-Werror=reorder" for `configure.ac` and fixes existing code.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Build code with `--enable-werror`
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Should make debugging CoinJoin in multi-wallet use cases a bit easier
## What was done?
Borrowed the idea from `WalletLogPrintf`
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run local node, looks like this (for a wallet named `mixing`)
```
2023-08-08T15:11:06Z [mixing] CCoinJoinClientManager::CheckAutomaticBackup -- Keys left since latest backup: 882
```
etc.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We only lock them on node load atm.
Fixes#5535
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
close and open a wallet with a mn collateral
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`-1` will only mean `not initialized` from now
Should fix crashes like
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/4893359925
This fix applied on top of #5525https://gitlab.com/UdjinM6/dash/-/pipelines/972154075
## What was done?
Introduce and use `m_initial_snapshot_index` instead of re-using
`nHeight`. Added a couple of asserts to make sure:
1. we never create mn lists with `nHeight` set to `-1` _explicitly_ (but
it's ok for ctor with no params to do so)
2. we never set `nHeight` to `-1` for an existing mn list
3. we never try to get a height for a non-initialized list
4. `GetListForBlockInternal` never returns non-initialized mn lists
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests, run regtest/testnet wallets.
## Breaking Changes
We never stored snapshots with `nHeight == -1`, should be no breaking
changes I think.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
By design we can have more and more and more gaps in indexes list so far as
we can not re-sign expired transaction of asset-unlock. CRangesList is protected from this situation
This data structure provide efficient storage for numbers if amount of gaps between them is not too big
It works similarly to CSkipSet but amount of gaps now in unlimited
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
## What was done?
Renaming of all classes/variables/functions/rpcs from `hpmn` to `evo`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
All unit and func tests are passing.
Sync of Testnet.
## Breaking Changes
All protx RPCs ending with `_hpmn` were converted to `_evo`.
`_hpmn` RPCs are now deprecated.
Although, they can still be enabled by adding `-deprecatedrpc=hpmn`.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`JoinExistingQueue` was tweaked for regtest/devnets in #4394 but we have
"skipping winners" logic in `StartNewQueue` too. We should also use
weighted count when checking "skip winners" conditions.
## What was done?
Add a helper to calculate the number and use it in both methods. Adjust
logic.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Running a local mixing node on devnet ~- no "skipping winners" in logs
anymore.~ and testnet
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Execute command when the best chainlock changes (`%s` in cmd is replaced
by chainlocked block hash). Same as `-blocknotify` but for chainlocks.
Let `-instantsendnotify` replace `%w` with wallet name like
`-walletnotify` does.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
fa2630328687645fbc7dd1ea46aac32514025715 fuzz: Check that NULL_DATA is unspendable (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
* Every script of type NULL_DATA must be unspendable
* The only know types of unspendable scripts are NULL_DATA and certain NONSTANDARD scripts
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK fa2630328687645fbc7dd1ea46aac32514025715
Tree-SHA512: 8297fbacf32b4868b12accc1c052d352d02d96540a1fc883de9d04a3df8734116deecc33046495c9a3af6d79fec7f8d63afbfa5e401a2ca8d7c70f0f13735c0d
176325a5a47befe32d480b3dc206dd0e64e04b21 [net processing] Remove dropmessagestest (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
-dropmessagestest is a command line option that causes 1 in n received
messages to be dropped. The Bitcoin P2P protocol is stateful and in
general cannot handle messages being dropped. Dropped
version/verack/ping/pong messages will cause the connection to time out
and be torn down. Other dropped messages may also cause the peer to
believe that the peer has stalled and tear down the connection.
It seems difficult to uncover any actual issues with -dropmessagestest,
and any coverage that could be generated would probably be easier to
trigger with fuzz testing.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK 176325a5a47befe32d480b3dc206dd0e64e04b21
practicalswift:
cr ACK 176325a5a47befe32d480b3dc206dd0e64e04b21
dhruv:
cr ACK 176325a
amitiuttarwar:
ACK 176325a5a47befe32d480b3dc206dd0e64e04b21
Tree-SHA512: bd582e5e8c9eb272a5d8ec01ff07c36c0033fbb84c30d1c72c87a7a6c7290021dcaf7bf549179a8b95aeb4f7243158d5593bc7fcf1ec16213782e470fe36bb89
b23349b8804fb60c6b3d7d0e2a95927a0d1b49b9 rpc: Add missing description of vout in getrawtransaction help text (Ben Carman)
Pull request description:
In `getrawtransaction` the vout did not have a description. I gave it the same description as the one used in `decoderawtransaction`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK b23349b8804fb60c6b3d7d0e2a95927a0d1b49b9 🏯
Tree-SHA512: 3833b97c82a46dfeb7ac825d4b2514b4b05ce54ac41f2144a8e2f2093b3411fe1d090c1e5b0c3d09200a2ea164c8d17ece12cdb43bbaeaeccc51a9da6dd7b7a3
23d8f346896c806581189c9eb870c7833c09f5be fuzz: replace CNode code with fuzz/util.h::ConsumeNode() (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Noticed this while updating the CNode fuzzing in #20210.
- cc26fab48d76a813d798657b18ae1af08a301150 created `test/fuzz/net.cpp` in May 2020
- 79ef8324d4c85ed16a304e98805724b8a created a CNode factory utility `test/fuzz/util.h::ConsumeNode()` in October 2020
This PR updates `fuzz/net.cpp` from the first commit to use `ConsumeNode()` from the second commit.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 23d8f346896c806581189c9eb870c7833c09f5be
Tree-SHA512: 26f7685395b3d48fcf40dde0d479d5c2fb4e953ec9371940b19eee16bb30aee4840b081e1a918b924a9704c1bef484302ea3e8fe63819a3bba73e7eb805164f1
010eed3ce03cf4fc622a48f40fc4d589383f7a44 doc: warn that incoming conns are unlikely when not using default ports (Adam Jonas)
Pull request description:
Closes#5150.
This was mostly copied from #5285 by sulks, who has since quit GitHub.
The issue has remained open for 6 years, but the extra explanation still seems useful.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK 010eed3ce03cf4fc622a48f40fc4d589383f7a44
Tree-SHA512: d240fb06bba41ad8898ced59356c10adefc09f3abb33e277f8e2c5980b40678f2d237f286b476451bb29d2b94032a7dee2ada3b2efe004ed1c2509e70b48e40f
a33442fdc73eabd1c5596ab92954344edc9517e6 Remove m_is_manual_connection from CNodeState (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Currently, this member is only used to exclude MANUAL peers from discouragement
in MaybePunishNodeForBlock(). Manual connections are already protected in
MaybeDiscourageAndDisconnect(), independently from their network
processing behaviors.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
cr ACK a33442fdc73eabd1c5596ab92954344edc9517e6
promag:
Code review ACK a33442fdc73eabd1c5596ab92954344edc9517e6.
jnewbery:
utACK a33442fdc73eabd1c5596ab92954344edc9517e6
amitiuttarwar:
code review ACK a33442fdc73eabd1c5596ab92954344edc9517e6
Tree-SHA512: cfe3f3dfa131373e3299002d34ae9e22ca6e1a966831bab32fcf06ff1d08f06095b4ab020cc4d267f3ec05ae23fbdc22373382ab828b999c0db11b8c842a4f0c
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Bad naming is noticed in https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5026 by
thephez
## What was done?
Renamed `assetLockedAmount` in CbTx to `creditPoolBalance`
Renamed also some local variables and functions to make it matched also.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run functional/unit tests - succeed
Called python's rpc binding `node.getblock(block_hash)['cbTx']`:
Got this result:
```
{'version': 3, 'height': 1556, 'merkleRootMNList': '978b2b4d1b884de62799b9eaee75c7812fea59f98f80d5ff9c963b0f0f195e14', 'merkleRootQuorums': 'bc7a34eb114f4e4bf38a11080b5d8ac41bdb36dd41e17467bae23c94ba06b013', 'bestCLHeightDiff': 0, 'bestCLSignature': '000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000', 'creditPoolBalance': Decimal('7.00141421')}
```
## Breaking Changes
Renamed `assetLockedAmount` in CbTx to `creditPoolBalance`. @shumkov be
informed
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
NOTE: There is slight difference with original backport due to future changes
in bitcoin#19272, bitcoin#19763 - otherwise functional test p2p_addr_relay.py fails
fa1da3d4bfc0511a89f5b19d5a4d89e55ff7ccde test: Add basic addr relay test (MarcoFalke)
fa1793c1c44a3f75a09f9c636467b8274c541bdd net: Pass connman const when relaying address (MarcoFalke)
fa47a0b003f53708b6d5df1ed4e7f8a7c68aa3ac net: Make addr relay mockable (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
As usual:
* Switch to std::chrono time to be type-safe and mockable
* Add basic test that relies on mocktime to add code coverage
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK fa1da3d
promag:
ACK fa1da3d4bfc0511a89f5b19d5a4d89e55ff7ccde (fabe56e44b6f683e24e37246a7a8851190947cb3 before https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18454#issuecomment-607866453), fa5bf23d527a450e72c2bf13d013e5393b664ca3 was dropped since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 0552bf8fcbe375baa3cab62acd8c23b2994efa47daff818ad1116d0ffaa0b9e520dc1bca2bbc68369b25584e85e54861fe6fd0968de4f503b95439c099df9bd7
fixup - see #19272, #19763
13d2a33537a403ac47a989be92109d3214375b6a Fix unregister_all_during_call cleanup (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Use `TestingSetup` fixture to fix `unregister_all_during_call` test not calling `UnregisterBackgroundSignalScheduler`, which could trigger an assert in `RegisterBackgroundSignalScheduler` when called in later tests
Failure reported by fanquake https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18551#issuecomment-610974251
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 13d2a33537a403ac47a989be92109d3214375b6a if appveyor unit tests pass
Tree-SHA512: d2ec8ff14c54d97903af50031abfac1f38ec1c3aabc90371cfd5b79481fa69d3d77f339bfdf7d2178fd85e83402f72eda7cf4d339e5bbfa7e6e1a68836643b93
fa1a92224dd78de817d15bcda35a8310254e1a54 rpc: Avoid initialization-order-fiasco on static CRPCCommand tables (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently the fiasco is only theoretical because all content of the table are compile-time constants. However, the fiasco materializes should they ever become run-time constants (e.g. #18531).
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK fa1a92224dd78de817d15bcda35a8310254e1a54.
practicalswift:
ACK fa1a92224dd78de817d15bcda35a8310254e1a54 -- fiasco bad :)
Tree-SHA512: cccadb0ad56194599b74f04264d74c34fa865958580a850efc6474bbdc56f30cadce6b2e9a6ad5472ff46c3f4c793366acd8090fad409a45b25d961f2d89da19
7a2ecf16df938dd95d3130a46082def7a02338eb Wallet: Change IsMine check in CWallet::DelAddressBook from assert to failure (Luke Dashjr)
2952c46b923042f2de801f319e03ed5c4c4eb735 Wallet: Replace CAddressBookData.name with GetLabel() method (Luke Dashjr)
d7092c392e10889cd7a080b3d22ed6446a59b87a QA: Test that change doesn't turn into non-change when spent in an avoid-reuse wallet (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #18192, not strictly necessary for 0.20
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 7a2ecf16df, only change is adding an assert_equal in the test 🔰
jnewbery:
utACK 7a2ecf16df938dd95d3130a46082def7a02338eb
Tree-SHA512: e0933ee40f705b751697dc27249e1868ed4874254b174ebdd0a7150125d8c818402e66df2371718c7eeb90e67ee2317215fb260aa9b9d7b9b45ee436de2988ff
7b8e15728d1ad058a4b7d7569fd5d5ba6806ca28 rpc: Fix rpcRunLater race in walletpassphrase (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Release locks before calling `rpcRunLater`.
Quick explanation: `rpcRunLater` leads to `event_free` which calls `event_del` which can wait for the event callback to finish if it's already running and that callback will try to lock wallet mutex - which is already locked in http thread.
Fixes#14995 , fixes#18482. Best reviewed with whitespace changes hidden.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 7b8e15728d, only tested that this avoids the node freezing. Did not look at how libevent works or how the deadlock happens or if this breaks other stuff. 📞
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 7b8e15728d1ad058a4b7d7569fd5d5ba6806ca28. Just updated comment since last review
Tree-SHA512: 17874a2fa7b0e164fb0d7ee4cb7d59650275b8c03476fb291d60af8b758495457660d3912623fb26259fefe84aeba21c0a9e0c6467982ba511f19344ed5413ab
2276339a176f83ffe8ceefb3e41ecca8601aa13b Add test for UnregisterAllValidationInterfaces bug (Russell Yanofsky)
3c61abbbc847d725f30d169278d84655571407c1 Do not clear validationinterface entries being executed (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
The previous code for MainSignalsInstance::Clear would decrement the reference
count of every interface, including ones that were already Unregister()ed but
still being executed.
This fixes the issue pointed out here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18524/files#r404395685 . It's not currently observable.
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
utACK 2276339a176f83ffe8ceefb3e41ecca8601aa13b - reviewed code and test (thanks @ryanofsky for adding the test).
MarcoFalke:
ACK 2276339a176f83ffe8ceefb3e41ecca8601aa13b 🎎
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 2276339a176f83ffe8ceefb3e41ecca8601aa13b. No change to bugfix, just rebased and new test commit added since last review
Tree-SHA512: c1d68e7c681a45c6cadc84e407c2266bcb4b12d34264e1232a61c4eadb74b551231c5a3b1d041de39f507aef4dfa7d4589b8bfe1833f069c739c6270d2a05dbe
d6815a2313158862d448733954a73520f223deb6 refactor: drop boost::signals2 in validationinterface (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Stop using boost::signals2 internally in validationinterface. Replace with std::list and Add/Remove/Clear/Iterate helper functions.
Motivation for change is to reduce dependencies and avoid issues happening with boost versions before 1.59: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18517, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18471
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK d6815a2313158862d448733954a73520f223deb6
laanwj:
ACK d6815a2313158862d448733954a73520f223deb6
hebasto:
re-ACK d6815a2313158862d448733954a73520f223deb6
promag:
ACK d6815a2313158862d448733954a73520f223deb6.
Tree-SHA512: 4fc0f14a8446e8616cc142af6c3d36815f3254525d30348ba8e4d4bc74c249a5a8c9bc119bdd1be7ebd7abe0b784bc0c5551a3e156a766890cb2fdd891a95919
d3a56be77a9d112cde4baef4314882170b9f228f Revert "gui: Avoid Wallet::GetBalance in WalletModel::pollBalanceChanged" (Russell Yanofsky)
bf0a510981ddc28c754881ca21c50ab18e5f2b59 gui: Avoid wallet tryGetBalances calls before TransactionChanged or BlockTip notifications (Russell Yanofsky)
2bc9b92ed8b7736ad67876398a0bb8287f57e9b3 Cancel wallet balance timer when shutdown requested (Russell Yanofsky)
83f69fab3a1ae97c5cff8ba1e6fd191b0fa264bb Switch transaction table to use wallet height not node height (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Main commit `gui: Avoid wallet tryGetBalances calls` is one-line change to `WalletModel::pollBalanceChanged` that returns early if there hasn't been a new `TransactionChanged` or `BlockTip` notification since the previous poll call. This is the same behavior that was implemented in #18160, now implemented in a simpler way.
The other commits are a straight revert of #18160, and two tweaks to avoid relying on `WalletModel::m_client_model` lifetime which were causing travis failures with earlier versions of this PR.
Motivation for this change is to be able to revert #18160 and cut down on unnecessary cross-process calls that happen when #18160 is combined with #10102
This PR is part of the [process separation project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/10).# This is a combination of 2 commits.
0933a37078e1ce3a3d70983c3e7f4b3ac6c3fa37 gui: Avoid Wallet::GetBalance in WalletModel::pollBalanceChanged (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Each 250ms the slot `WalletModel::pollBalanceChanged` is called which, at worst case, calls `Wallet::GetBalance`. This is a waste of resources since most of the time there aren't new transactions or new blocks. Fix this by early checking if cache is dirty or not.
The actual balance computation can still hang the GUI thread but that is tracked in #16874 and should be fixed with a solution similar to #17135.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 0933a37078e1ce3a3d70983c3e7f4b3ac6c3fa37, I have not tested the code, but I have reviewed it and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
jonasschnelli:
utACK 0933a37078e1ce3a3d70983c3e7f4b3ac6c3fa37
instagibbs:
ACK 0933a37078e1ce3a3d70983c3e7f4b3ac6c3fa37
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 0933a37078e1ce3a3d70983c3e7f4b3ac6c3fa37, but I would prefer (not strongly) for #17905 to be merged first. This PR can be simpler if it is based on #17905, so tryGetBalances can just be left alone instead of changing into to a more complicated tryGetBalancesIfNeeded function, and then getting changed back later when we want to optimize it out.
jonatack:
ACK 0933a37078e based primarily on code review, despite a lot of manual testing with a large 177MB wallet.
Tree-SHA512: 18db35bf33a7577666658c8cb0b57308c8474baa5ea95bf1468cd8531a69857d8915584f6ac505874717aa6aabeb1b506ac77630f8acdb6651afab89275e38a1
Dash uses the height and difficulty of the previous block to calculate
the subsidy for the current block... which in the case of the genesis
block is block -1, which doesn't exist.
Attempting in reading `pprev` which is will evaluate to a `nullptr`, so
for any blocks <=0, we fetch the subsidy expected from block 0 from
CChainParams.
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
There's one type of output that potentially can be useful for bloom
filter.
It's follow-up for TODO for dashpay/dash#4857.
Asset Lock transactions have:
- standard inputs (covered by regular bloom filter implementation)
- standard outputs (covered by regular bloom filter implementation)
- special outputs that have public key to proof owing this credits on
platform and claiming it.
Asset Unlock transactions have:
- no inputs (no need bloom)
- standard outputs (covered by regular bloom filter implementation)
So far as there's only one special case, let's have this data in the
bloom filter because it can potentially help to show information such as
"Deposit to platform" on mobile clients.
## What was done?
- added special case for Asset Lock transactions for bloom filter
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests. Doesn't actually tested how bloom filter
works.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
1816327e533d359c237c53eb6440b2f3a7cbf4fa p2p: Put disconnecting logs into BCLog::NET category (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It's too noisy:
```
$ cat debug.log | wc -l
28529
$ cat debug.log | grep "Disconnecting and discouraging peer" | wc -l
10177
```
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
noban, addnode and local peers are still unconditionally logged (as they should), but this one can go into a category, so cr-ACK 1816327e533d359c237c53eb6440b2f3a7cbf4fa
practicalswift:
ACK 1816327e533d359c237c53eb6440b2f3a7cbf4fa for the reasons MarcoFalke gave above.
ajtowns:
ACK 1816327e533d359c237c53eb6440b2f3a7cbf4fa
Tree-SHA512: c312c1009090840659b2cb1364d8ad9b6ab8e742fc462aef169996d93c76c248507639a00257ed9d73a6916c01176b1793491b2305e92fdded5f9de0935b6ba6
fac7ab1d5b58fb9cfd80d5cf74ac4d2e5cb8eff2 refactor: Use C++17 std::array where possible (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Using the C++11 std::array with explicit template parameters is problematic because overshooting the size will fill the memory with default constructed types.
For example,
```cpp
#include <array>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
std::array<int, 3> a{1, 2};
for (const auto& i : a) {
std::cout << i << std::endl; // prints "1 2 0"
}
}
```
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Code Review ACK fac7ab1d5b58fb9cfd80d5cf74ac4d2e5cb8eff2
practicalswift:
cr ACK fac7ab1d5b58fb9cfd80d5cf74ac4d2e5cb8eff2
vasild:
ACK fac7ab1d
promag:
Code review ACK fac7ab1d5b58fb9cfd80d5cf74ac4d2e5cb8eff2.
Tree-SHA512: ef7e872340226e0d6160e6fd66c6ca78b2ef9c245fa0ab27fe4777aac9fba8d5aaa154da3d27b65dec39a6a63d07f1063c3a8ffb667a98ab137756a1a0af2656
cadb77a6ab8a3e6f56062cfaec4dd8168c71b39d net: Add compat.h header for htonl function (Hennadii Stepanov)
f796f0057bc7dad8e7065831b07f432fc0fb9f08 net: Drop unneeded headers when compat.h included (Hennadii Stepanov)
467c34644861a5267601255650e27c7aadab31dc net: Drop unneeded Windows headers in compat.h (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
It is the `compat.h` header's job to provide platform-agnostic interfaces for internet operations.
No need in `#include <arpa/inet.h>` scattered around.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
re-ACK cadb77a6ab8a3e6f56062cfaec4dd8168c71b39d: patch looks even better
laanwj:
Code review ACK cadb77a6ab8a3e6f56062cfaec4dd8168c71b39d
Tree-SHA512: 625ff90b2806310ab856a6ca1ddb6d9a85aa70f342b323e8525a711dd12219a1ecec8373ec1dca5a0653ffb11f9b421753887b25615d991ba3132c1cca6a3c6e
1e62350ca20898189904a88dfef9ea11ddcd8626 refactor: Improve use of explicit keyword (Fabian Jahr)
c502a6dbfb854ca827a5a3925394f9e09d29b898 lint: Use c++17 std in cppcheck linter (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
I found the `extended-lint-cppcheck` linter still uses `std=c++11` when reviewing #20471. The only difference in the output after this change is one line is missing:
```
src/script/descriptor.cpp:159:5: warning: Struct 'PubkeyProvider' has a constructor with 1 argument that is not explicit. [noExplicitConstructor]
```
After some digging, I am still not sure why this one is ignored with c++17 when 40 other`noExplicitConstructor` warnings were still appearing.
In the second commit, I fix these warnings, adding `explicit` where appropriate and adding fixes to ignore otherwise.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 1e62350ca20898189904a88dfef9ea11ddcd8626: patch looks correct!
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 1e62350ca20898189904a88dfef9ea11ddcd8626
Tree-SHA512: dff7b324429a57160e217cf38d9ddbb6e70c6cb3d3e3e0bd4013d88e07afc2292c3df94d0acf7122e9d486322821682ecf15c8f2724a78667764c05d47f89a12
fa40168ab3102b9ad850f967a0e7fa22dbfbd0c6 Remove unused bits from service flags enum (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Remove service bits that haven't been observed on the active network for years and won't ever be observed on the network with this meaning. Keeping this dead assignment in our source code forever doesn't add any value.
I somehow forgot to do this in commit fa0d0ff6e1bee60fde63724ae28a51aac5a94d4a.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa40168ab3102b9ad850f967a0e7fa22dbfbd0c6
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa40168ab3102b9ad850f967a0e7fa22dbfbd0c6
fanquake:
ACK fa40168ab3102b9ad850f967a0e7fa22dbfbd0c6
Tree-SHA512: 376e5ac05940493cf2209fea60515c843e978c4b476f2524f6bf7a37a646d237c3ddcf6c0fa23641f9ba550f625609703d9b51b4be631a7f2a90e1092b557232
fa8abdc9953e381715493b259908e246914793b0 rpc: Use FeeModes doc helper in estimatesmartfee (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Not sure why this doesn't use the doc helper, probably an oversight?
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa8abdc9953e381715493b259908e246914793b0
Tree-SHA512: 1f2dc8356e3476ddcf9cafafa7f9865ad95bed1e3067c0edab8e3c483e374bdbdbecc066167554b4a1b479e28f6a52c4ae6a75a70c67ee4e1ff4f3ba36b04001
6690adba08006739da0060eb4937126bdfa1181a Warn when binaries are built from a dirty branch. (Tyler Chambers)
Pull request description:
- Adjusted `--version` flag behavior in bitcoind and bitcoin-wallet to have the same behavior.
- Added `--version` flag to bitcoin-tx to match.
- Added functionality in gen-manpages.sh to error when attempting to generate man pages for binaries built from a dirty branch.
mitigates problem with issue #20412
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Tested ACK 6690adba08006739da0060eb4937126bdfa1181a
Tree-SHA512: b5ca509f1a57f66808c2bebc4b710ca00c6fec7b5ebd7eef58018e28e716f5f2358e36551b8a4df571bf3204baed565a297aeefb93990e7a99add502b97ee1b8
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Since v19, Evo nodes are paid 4x blocks in a row.
This needs to be reverted when MN Reward Reallocation activates.
## What was done?
Starting from MN Reward Reallocation activation, Evo nodes are paid one
block in a row (like regular masternodes).
In addition, `nConsecutivePayments` isn't incremented anymore for Evo
nodes.
## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_hpmn.py` with MN Reward Reallocation activation.
## Breaking Changes
no
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Akimov <knstqq@gmail.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
It partially resolves issue https://github.com/dashpay/dash/issues/5471
Better unit tests are needed to validate changes in ProTx implementation
such as this PR: https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5463
## What was done?
- Invalid ProTx transactions are checked more strictly. The flag "tx is
failed" is not enough now for test to succeed, but error code should
matched with expected error.
- Duplicated implementations of tests for "valid" and "invalid
transaction" are changed to more general code.
- Added extra log output with tx ID for easier debug - to see which
exactly tx is failed in test
- Supported more by 256 txes in one json file
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
LLMQContext uses RAII to initialize all members. Ensured that all
members always initialized correctly in proper order if LLMQContext
exists.
BlockAssembler, CChainState use too many agruments and they are making
wrong assumption that members of LLMQContext can be constructed and used
independently, but that's not true. Instead, let's pass LLMQContext
whenever possible.
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
https://github.com/dashpay/dash-issues/issues/52
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional test and introduce no breaking changes.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We have plenty of block space. Having `fallbackfee` disabled by default
is needlessly annoying.
## What was done?
Bump `DEFAULT_FALLBACK_FEE` to `1000`, same as it is on `master`
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/master/src/wallet/wallet.h#L68
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests, send txes on testnet
## Breaking Changes
should be none
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
RPC help for mempoolentry incorrectly called the "instantsend" field
"time". The "instantsend" and "unbroadcast" fields were also in a
different order than the actual response.
## What was done?
Changed "time" -> "instantsend" and flipped order of
"instantsend"/"unbroadcast"
## How Has This Been Tested?
Built and checked locally
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
624bab00dd2cc8e2ebd77dc0a669bc8d507c3721 test: add coverage for getwalletinfo format field (Jon Atack)
5e737a009234cbd7cf53748d3d28a2da5221192f rpc, wallet: Expose database format in getwalletinfo (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Support for sqlite based wallets was added in #19077. This PR adds the `format` key in `getwalletinfo` response, that can be `bdb` or `sqlite`.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Tested ACK 624bab00dd2cc8e2ebd77dc0a669bc8d507c3721
laanwj:
Code review ACK 624bab00dd2cc8e2ebd77dc0a669bc8d507c3721.
MarcoFalke:
doesn't hurt ACK 624bab00dd2cc8e2ebd77dc0a669bc8d507c3721
hebasto:
ACK 624bab00dd2cc8e2ebd77dc0a669bc8d507c3721, tested on Linux Mint 20 (x86_64).
meshcollider:
utACK 624bab00dd2cc8e2ebd77dc0a669bc8d507c3721
Tree-SHA512: a81f8530f040f6381d33e073a65f281993eccfa717424ab6e651c1203cbaf27794dcb7175570459e7fdaa211565bc060d0a3ecbe70d2b6f9c49b8d5071e4441c
9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91 refactor: Assert before dereference in CWallet::GetDatabase (João Barbosa)
021feb3187b207d511561c1f0ffd7f9e5e0c9c1d refactor: Drop redudant CWallet::GetDBHandle (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code Review ACK 9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91
meshcollider:
utACK 9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 9b74461fa293453a9eb0b1717b30b3f7fa778d91. Changes since last review: rebasing due to conflict, dropping wallet path commit c6a5cd7a64c78b162f545a3467d0fea7dcaadfcc as suggested in discussion, making GetDatabase() const in the earlier commit. Giving more descriptive title like
Tree-SHA512: 68cf3b5e9fe0acb3a5cd081086629989f213f1904cc344e5775767b56759a7d905b1e1c303afbe40f172ff81bf07f3719b59d8f6ec2de3fdd53cd0e2d220fb25
17a5f172fa9ec509b1c3f950ee8dfb6f025534d2 fuzz: Make addrman fuzzing harness deterministic (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Make `CAddrMan` fuzzing harness deterministic.
See [`doc/fuzzing.md`](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/fuzzing.md) for information on how to fuzz Bitcoin Core. Don't forget to contribute any coverage increasing inputs you find to the [Bitcoin Core fuzzing corpus repo](https://github.com/bitcoin-core/qa-assets).
Happy fuzzing :)
ACKs for top commit:
Crypt-iQ:
utACK 17a5f172fa9ec509b1c3f950ee8dfb6f025534d2
Tree-SHA512: 725f983745233e9b616782247fa18847e483c074ca4336a5beea8a9009128c3a74b4d50a12662d8ca2177c2e1fc5fc121834df6b459ac0af43c931d77ef7c4d8
e416cfc92bf51f6fd088ab61c2306c5e73877dd0 Add MAX_STANDARD_SCRIPTSIG_SIZE to policy (sanket1729)
Pull request description:
Bitcoin core has a standardness rule for max satisfaction script sig size.
This PR adds to the policy header file so that it is documented along with
along policy rules. The initial reasoning that 1650 is an implicit
limit(would not reach assuming all other policy rules are being
followed) is outdated.
As we now know, bitcoin transactions can have spend conditions are more than
just signatures and there may exist p2sh transactions involving 100 byte
preimages that maybe non-standard because of this rule. Because this
rule is no longer implicit, we should explicitly document it in policy
header file
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
utACK e416cfc92bf51f6fd088ab61c2306c5e73877dd0
practicalswift:
cr ACK e416cfc92bf51f6fd088ab61c2306c5e73877dd0
theStack:
Code Review ACK e416cfc92bf51f6fd088ab61c2306c5e73877dd0
Tree-SHA512: 1a91ee23dfb6085807e04dd0687d7a443e0f3e0f52d0a995a6599dff28533b0b599afba2724735d93948a64a3e25d0bc016ce3e771c0bd453eef78b22dc2369d
a6739cc86827759c543bf81f5532ec46e40549c3 rpc: Add specific error code for "wallet already loaded" (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Add a separate RPC error code for "wallet already loaded" to avoid having to match on message to detect this.
Requested by shesek for rust-bitcoinrpc.
If concept ACKed needs:
- [ ] Release note
- [x] A functional test (updated the existing test to make it pass, I think this is enough)
ACKs for top commit:
jonasschnelli:
Code Review ACK a6739cc86827759c543bf81f5532ec46e40549c3
promag:
Code review ACK a6739cc86827759c543bf81f5532ec46e40549c3.
Tree-SHA512: 9091872e6ea148aec733705d6af330f72a02f23b936b892ac28f9023da7430af6332418048adbee6014305b812316391812039e9180f7f3362d11f206c13b7d0
5021810650afc3073c2af6953ff046ad4d27a1fc Make CanFlushToDisk a const member function (practicalswift)
281cf995547f7683a9e9186bc6384a9fb6035d10 Do not run functions with necessary side-effects in assert() (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Do not run functions with necessary side-effects in `assert()`.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 5021810650afc3073c2af6953ff046ad4d27a1fc
sipa:
utACK 5021810650afc3073c2af6953ff046ad4d27a1fc
theStack:
Code Review ACK 5021810650afc3073c2af6953ff046ad4d27a1fc 🟢
Tree-SHA512: 38b7faccc2f16a499f9b7b1b962b49eb58580b2a2bbf63ea49dcc418a5ecc8f21a0972fa953f66db9509c7239af67cfa2f9266423fd220963d091034d7332b96
9a0653553a0ec403b4e7c6713466e0c7fa10ec94 Refactor ProcessNewBlock to reduce code duplication (R E Broadley)
Pull request description:
There are probably a few issues with this code (maybe there's even a reason this code is duplicated as it currently is), so apologies in advance that I'm still a little (maybe very) bad with C++
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 9a0653553a0ec403b4e7c6713466e0c7fa10ec94 💻
promag:
Code review ACK 9a0653553a0ec403b4e7c6713466e0c7fa10ec94.
theStack:
Code-review ACK 9a0653553a0ec403b4e7c6713466e0c7fa10ec94 🌴
Tree-SHA512: f8634ffad4b2370204d1a0945db4e27248b9e579d9912784da432b8ee3303cae424fa9f7500000dcfb31e6d29d04a8f7d322d17a6fe3d4adaddd10c539458a8c
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Current implementation of MnEhfTx is not matched with DIP-0023, this PR
fixes it. It is a prior work for
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5469
## What was done?
- requestID is fixed from `clsig{quorumHeight}` to `mnhf{versionBit}` +
fixes for signature validation properly
- v20 is minimal height to accept MnEHF special transactions
- versionBit is not BLS version - removed unrelated wrong code and
validations
- TxMempool will accept MnEHF transaction even if inputs/outputs are
zeroes and no fee
- implemented python's serialization/deserialization of MnEHF
transactions for future using in functional tests
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run functional/unit tests. Beside that there's new functional test in
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5469 that actually test format of
transaction and signature validation - to be merged later.
## Breaking Changes
Payload of MnEhf tx is changed, related consensus rules are changed.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
f827e151a2ce96e14aadb9e7d25045fe0a8afbd2 refactor: remove straggling boost::mutex usage (fanquake)
Pull request description:
After the merge of #18710, the linter is warning:
```bash
A new Boost dependency in the form of "boost/thread/mutex.hpp" appears to have been introduced:
src/sync.cpp:#include <boost/thread/mutex.hpp>
src/test/sync_tests.cpp:#include <boost/thread/mutex.hpp>
^---- failure generated from test/lint/lint-includes.sh
```
#18710 removed `boost/thread/mutex.hpp` from lint-includes, however in the interim #19337 was merged, which introduced more `boost::mutex` usage.
Given we no longer use `boost::mutex`, just remove the double lock test and remaining includes.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK f827e151a2ce96e14aadb9e7d25045fe0a8afbd2
hebasto:
ACK f827e151a2ce96e14aadb9e7d25045fe0a8afbd2
Tree-SHA512: f738b12189fe5b39db3e8f8231e9002714413a962eaf98adc84a6614fa474df5616358cfb1c89b92a2b0564efa9b704a774c49d4a25dca18a0ccc3cd9eabfc0a
89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Allow specifying wallet_name param matching RPC endpoint (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Allow specifying the `wallet_name` param to `unloadwallet` on RPC wallet endpoints, so long as it matches the endpoint wallet.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 89bdad5b25ae4ac03a486f729a5b58ae6f21946d
Tree-SHA512: efb399c33f7b5596870a26a8680f453ca47aa7a6db4e550f9435d13044f1c4bad0ae11e8f0205213409d08b75c4188c3be782e54aafab1f65b97eb8cf5c252a9
95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6 sync: detect double lock from the same thread (Vasil Dimov)
4df6567e4cbb4677e8048de2f8008612e1b860b9 sync: make EnterCritical() & push_lock() type safe (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Double lock of the same (non-recursive) mutex from the same thread would produce an undefined behavior. Detect this from `DEBUG_LOCKORDER` and react similarly to the deadlock detection.
This came up during discussion in another, related PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19238#discussion_r442394521.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6
hebasto:
re-ACK 95975dd08d8fdaaeaf28e0d06b861ce2748c17b6
Tree-SHA512: 375c62db7819e348bfaecc3bd82a7907fcd8f5af24f7d637ac82f3f16789da9fc127dbd0e37158a08e0dcbba01a55c6635caf1d8e9e827cf5a3747f7690a498e
fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c net: Treat raw message bytes as uint8_t (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Using `uint8_t` from the beginning when messages are `recv`ed has two style benefits:
* The signedness is clear from reading the code, as it does not depend on the architecture
* When passing the bytes on, the need for static signedness casts is dropped, making the code a bit less verbose and more coherent
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c
theStack:
Code Review ACK fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c
jonatack:
Tested ACK fabecce71909c984504c21fa05f91d5f1b471e8c
Tree-SHA512: e6d9803c78633fde3304faf592afa961ff9462a7912d1da97a24720265274aa10ab4168d71b6ec2756b7448dd42585321afee0e5c889e705be778ce9a330d145
fa5ed3b4ca609426b2622cad235e107d33db7b30 net: Use Span in ReceiveMsgBytes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Pass a data pointer and a size as span in `ReceiveMsgBytes` to get the benefits of a span
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK fa5ed3b4ca609426b2622cad235e107d33db7b30 code review, rebased to current master 12a1c3ad1a43634, debug build, unit tests, ran bitcoind/-netinfo/getpeerinfo
theStack:
ACK fa5ed3b4ca609426b2622cad235e107d33db7b30
Tree-SHA512: 89bf111323148d6e6e50185ad20ab39f73ab3a58a27e46319e3a08bcf5dcf9d6aa84faff0fd6afb90cb892ac2f557a237c144560986063bc736a69ace353ab9d
6927933782acb9b158787e6f35debb916793f6b1 [net processing] Add ChainSyncTimeoutState default initializers (John Newbery)
55966e0cc03f0e380d21a9434b048d4d515b6729 [net processing] Remove CNodeState ctor body (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This addresses the two outstanding review comments from #21370.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK 6927933782acb9b158787e6f35debb916793f6b1: patch looks correct
hebasto:
ACK 6927933782acb9b158787e6f35debb916793f6b1, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: b3ef5c8a096e447887df255406b3a760f01c73e2b942374595416b4b4031fc69b89cd93168c45040489d581f340b2a62d3fbabd207d4307f587c00a7a7daacd1
c92387232f750397da7d131f262c150a608408c2 refactor: Extract ParseOpCode from ParseScript (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Seems more natural to have `mapOpNames` "hidden" in `ParseOpCode` than in `ParseScript`.
A second lookup in `mapOpNames` is also removed.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK c92387232f750397da7d131f262c150a608408c2
theStack:
re-ACK c92387232f750397da7d131f262c150a608408c2
Tree-SHA512: d59d1964760622cf365479d44e3e676aa0bf46b60e77160140d967e012042df92121d3224c7551dc96eff5ff3294598cc6bade82adb3f60d28810e18e60e1257
33330778230961cfbf2a24de36b5877e395cc596 rpc: Adjust witness-tx deserialize error message (MarcoFalke)
cccc7525697e7b8d99b545e34f0f504c78ffdb94 rpc: Properly deserialize txs with witness before signing (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Signing a transaction can only happen when the transaction has inputs. A transaction with inputs can always be deserialized as witness-transaction. If `try_no_witness` decoding is attempted, this will lead to rare intermittent failures.
Fixes#18803
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 33330778230961cfbf2a24de36b5877e395cc596
ajtowns:
ACK 33330778230961cfbf2a24de36b5877e395cc596
Tree-SHA512: 73f8a5cdfe03fb0e68908d2fa09752c346406f455694a020ec0dd1267ef8f0a583b8e84063ea74aac127106dd193b72623ca6d81469a94b3f5b3c766ebf2c42b
9d09132be4ff99f98ca905c342347d5f35f13350 CConnman: initialise at declaration rather than in Start() (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Ensure nMaxOutboundTotalBytesSentInCycle and nMaxOutboundCycleStartTime are initialized even if CConnman::Start() is not called. Prevents failures in test/fuzz/connman when run under valgrind.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 9d09132be4ff99f98ca905c342347d5f35f13350: patch looks correct!
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 9d09132be4ff99f98ca905c342347d5f35f13350 , checked that we call Start only once and in the same scope where connman is constructed (AppInitMain) 💸
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 9d09132be4
Tree-SHA512: 1c6c893e8c616a91947a8cc295b0ba508af3ecfcdcd94cdc5f95d808cc93c6d1a71fd24dcc194dc583854e9889fb522ca8523043367fb0263370fbcab08c6aaa
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Fixes issue #5497.
## What was done?
Checks if settings file is empty, and deletes it if that's the case.
It will will be generated with default value `{}` afterwards.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Running Dash Qt on regtest masternode with `--nocleanup` and
`./src/qt/dash-qt --regtest --datadir=`
## Breaking Changes
No
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
The logic for additional indexes is incomplete, handling of P2PK on
block disconnect is broken (luckily no one is using P2PK and reorgs are
rare) and there are a few other small issues that would be nice to have
fixed.
## What was done?
Pls see individual commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run `feature_dbcrash.py`, it should succeed (NOTE: it takes ~30 minutes
to complete, that's normal).
Run `feature_addressindex.py`, `feature_timestampindex.py` and
`feature_spentindex.py` (and other tests) should still succeed too.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This is an implementation of DIP0027 "Credit Asset Locks".
It's a mechanism to fluidly exchange between Dash and credits.
## What was done?
This pull request includes:
- Asset Lock transaction
- Asset Unlock transaction (withdrawal)
- Credit Pool in coinbase
- Unit tests for Asset Lock/Unlock tx
- New functional test `feature_asset_locks.py`
RPC: currently locked amount (credit pool) is available through rpc call
`getblock`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
There added new unit tests for basic checks of transaction validity
(asset lock/unlock).
Also added new functional test "feature_asset_locks.py" that cover
typical cases, but not all corner cases yet.
## Breaking Changes
This feature should be activated as hard-fork because:
- It adds 2 new special transaction and one of them [asset unlock tx]
requires update consensus rulels
- It adds new data in coinbase tx (credit pool)
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
**To release DIP 0027**
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Refusing to process `dsq` will result in node not being able to process
`dstx`es later.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
V19 is active on mainnet/testnet now, no need to check activation bits
anymore. This PR also bumps `MinBIP9WarningHeight` to
post-v19-activation height which should stop `unknown new rules
activated (versionbit 8)` warning from appearing.
## What was done?
Bury v19, bump `MinBIP9WarningHeight`
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests, reindex on mainnet/testnet.
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
d76925478efd35e6fd835370639f2139b28381e4 [doc] Clarify semantic of peer's m_protect w.r.t to outbound eviction logics (Antoine Riard)
ac71fe936da290adf5a3155fe8db5f78b485f1f1 [doc] Clarify scope of eviction protection of outbound block-relay peers (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Block-relay-only peers were introduced by #15759. According to its
author, it was intented to make them only immune to outbound peer
rotation-based eviction and not from all eviction as modified comment
leans to think of.
Clearly indicate that outbound block-relay peers aren't protected
from eviction by the bad/lagging chain logic.
Fix#19863
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK d76925478efd35e6fd835370639f2139b28381e4
jonatack:
ACK d76925478efd35e6fd835370639f2139b28381e4
Tree-SHA512: 597fbd62838a6e39276024165b11514cad20a2e9d33cf9202d261cbadcb62b2df427c858e0cb57e585840d4c1d4600104aa53916bb868541f2580e4eed9b4b52
fab94534b64593be1620c989bf69eb02e1be9b1b doc: Document that wallet salvage is experimental (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
See #20151
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fab94534b64593be1620c989bf69eb02e1be9b1b: user safety first
hebasto:
ACK fab94534b64593be1620c989bf69eb02e1be9b1b, maybe capitalize into "WARNING"?
meshcollider:
Trivial ACK fab94534b64593be1620c989bf69eb02e1be9b1b
Tree-SHA512: 94912c491facc485293e4333066057933d706d84c7172f615296e7ba998c583c8bd07e751e6f00cd6576e7791007ace321f959181f7bf6a4e15e10d7ec8a1b7e
fc289b7898fb90d4800675b69c0bb9b42df5599f wallet: Refactor WalletRescanReserver to use wallet reference (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Simple refactor to `WalletRescanReserver` to use wallet reference instead of pointer.
Complements #18259.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK fc289b7898fb90d4800675b69c0bb9b42df5599f
Tree-SHA512: b03e33f2d9df2870436aa3284137fd022dd89ea96a1b170fa27f8685ad4f986e6c4ba5975a84966c30d18430a4014d7d8740a1dff2f985c9ef8226ed18e69db9
a2324e4d3f47f084b07a364c9a360a0bf31e86a0 test: Improve naming and logging of avoid_reuse tests (Fabian Jahr)
1abbdac6777bc5396d17a6772c8176a354730997 wallet: Prefer full destination groups in coin selection (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Fixes#17603 (together with #17843)
In the case of destination groups of >10 outputs existing in a wallet with `avoid_reuse` enabled, the grouping algorithm is adding left-over outputs as an "incomplete" group to the list of groups even when a full group has already been added. This leads to the strange behavior that if there are >10 outputs for a destination the transaction spending from that will effectively use `len(outputs) % 10` as inputs for that transaction.
From the original PR and the code comment I understand the correct behavior should be the usage of 10 outputs. I opted for minimal changes in the current code although there maybe optimizations possible for cases with >20 outputs on a destination this sounds like too much of an edge case right now.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
Re-ACK a2324e4
achow101:
ACK a2324e4d3f47f084b07a364c9a360a0bf31e86a0
kallewoof:
ACK a2324e4d3f47f084b07a364c9a360a0bf31e86a0
meshcollider:
Tested ACK a2324e4d3f47f084b07a364c9a360a0bf31e86a0 (verified the new test fails on master without this change)
Tree-SHA512: 4743779c5d469fcd16df5baf166024b1d3c8eaca151df1e8281b71df62b29541cf7bfee3f8ab48d83e3b34c9256e53fd38a7b146a54c79f9caa44cce3636971a
d67055e00dd90f504384e5c3f229fc95306d5aac Upgrade or rewrite encrypted key checksums (Andrew Chow)
c9a9ddb4142af0af5f7b1a5ccd13f8e585007089 Set fDecryptionThoroughlyChecked based on whether crypted key checksums are valid (Andrew Chow)
a8334f7ac39532528c5f8bd3b0eea05aa63e8794 Read and write a checksum for encrypted keys (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Adds a checksum to the encrypted key record in the wallet database so that encrypted keys can be checked for corruption on wallet loading, in the same way that unencrypted keys are. This allows for us to skip the full decryption of keys upon the first unlocking of the wallet in that session as any key corruption will have already been detected. The checksum is just the double SHA256 of the encrypted key and it is appended to the record after the encrypted key itself.
This is backwards compatible as old wallets will be able to read the encrypted key and ignore that there is more data in the stream. Additionally, old wallets will be upgraded upon their first unlocking (so that key decryption is checked before we commit to a checksum of the encrypted key) and a wallet flag set indicating that. The presence of the wallet flag lets us skip the full decryption as if `fDecryptionThoroughlyChecked` were true.
This does mean that the first time an old wallet is unlocked in a new version will take much longer, but subsequent unlocks will be instantaneous. Furthermore, corruption will be detected upon loading rather than on trying to send so wallet corruption will be detected sooner.
Fixes#12423
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK d67055e00dd90f504384e5c3f229fc95306d5aac
jonatack:
Code review ACK d67055e00dd90f504384e5c3f229fc95306d5aac
meshcollider:
Code review ACK d67055e00dd90f504384e5c3f229fc95306d5aac
Tree-SHA512: d5c1c10cfcb5db9e10dcf2326423565a9f499290b81f3155ec72254ed5bd7491e2ff5c50e98590eb07842c20d7797b4efa1c3475bae64971d500aad3b4e711d4
25dac9fa65243ca8db02df22f484039c08114401 doc: add release notes for explicit fee estimators and bumpfee change (Karl-Johan Alm)
05227a35545d7656450874b3668bf418c73813fb tests for bumpfee / estimate_modes (Karl-Johan Alm)
3404c1b753432c4859a4ca245f01c240610a00cb policy: optional FeeEstimateMode param to CFeeRate::ToString (Karl-Johan Alm)
6fcf4484302d13bd7739b617470d8c8e31974908 rpc/wallet: add two explicit modes to estimate_mode (Karl-Johan Alm)
b188d80c2de9ebb114da5ceea78baa46bde7dff6 MOVEONLY: Make FeeEstimateMode available to CFeeRate (Karl-Johan Alm)
5d1a411eb12fc700804ffe5d6e205234d30edd5f fees: add FeeModes doc helper function (Karl-Johan Alm)
91f6d2bc8ff4d4cd1b86daa370ec9d2d9662394d rpc/wallet: add conf_target as alias to confTarget in bumpfee (Karl-Johan Alm)
69158b41fc488e4f220559da17a475eff5923a95 added CURRENCY_ATOM to express minimum indivisible unit (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This lets users pick their own fees when using `sendtoaddress`/`sendmany` if they prefer this over the estimators.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
re-utACK 25dac9fa65: rebased, more fancy C++,
jonatack:
ACK 25dac9fa65243ca8db02df2 I think this should be merged after all this time, even though it looks to me like there are needed follow-ups, fixes and test coverage to be added (see further down), which I don't mind helping out with, if wanted.
fjahr:
Code review ACK 25dac9fa65243ca8db02df22f484039c08114401
Tree-SHA512: f31177e6cabf3187a43cdfe93477144f8e8385c7344613743cbbd16e8490d53ff5144aec7b9de6c9a65eb855b55e0f99d7f164dee4b6bf3cfea4dce51cf11d33
fab860aed4878b831dae463e1ee68029b66210f5 fuzz: Stop nodes in process_message* fuzzers (MarcoFalke)
6666c828e072a5e99ea0c16394ca3e5b9de07409 fuzz: Give CNode ownership to ConnmanTestMsg in process_message fuzz harness (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Background is that I saw an integer overflow in net_processing
```
#30629113 REDUCE cov: 25793 ft: 142917 corp: 3421/2417Kb lim: 4096 exec/s: 89 rss: 614Mb L: 1719/4096 MS: 1 EraseBytes-
net_processing.cpp:977:25: runtime error: signed integer overflow: 2147483624 + 100 cannot be represented in type 'int'
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior net_processing.cpp:977:25 in
net_processing.cpp:985:9: runtime error: signed integer overflow: -2147483572 - 100 cannot be represented in type 'int'
SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior net_processing.cpp:985:9 in
```
Telling from the line numbers, it looks like `nMisbehavior` wrapped around.
Fix that by calling `StopNodes` after each exec, which should clear the node state and thus `nMisbehavior`.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK fab860aed4878b831dae463e1ee68029b66210f5
Tree-SHA512: 891c081d5843565d891aec028b6c27ef3fa39bc40ae78238e81d8f784b4d4b49cb870998574725a5159dd03aeeb2e0b9bc3d3bb51d57d1231ef42e3394b2d639
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Here's TODO that seems out-dated
```
/// TODO: all 4 functions do not belong here really, they should be refactored/moved somewhere (main.cpp ?)
```
This changes are extracted from this PR:
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5342
## What was done?
This changes hides some methods from global namespace (making local
static function), hiding other functions to the namespace
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## What was done?
write in logs of TxMempool tx's hashes instead whole txes
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Legacy IS messages are gone long time ago, no need to keep them in code.
## What was done?
Drop `MSG_LEGACY_TXLOCK_REQUEST`/`LEGACYTXLOCKREQUEST`
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
5 minute profiling shows previous usage around ~7% and current usage
around ~2%
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Due to us rapidly receiving multiple duplicates of DSQueue's, we start
processing them before it's added the the vector of processed ones, we
probably at one point tried to minimize locked time, but that's not
productive here
## What was done?
Expand the locked scope to ensure we don't double process.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Ran full node for 5-10 minutes
## Breaking Changes
Should be none
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Implementation of Randomness Beacon Part 3.
Starting from v20 activation fork, members for quorums are sorted using
(if available) the best CL signature found in Coinbase.
If no CL signature is present yet, then the usual way is used (By using
Blockhash instead)
The actual new way to shuffle is already implemented in
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5366.
SPV clients also need to calculate members, but they only know block
headers.
Since Coinbase is in the actual block, then they lack the required
information to correctly calculate quorum members.
## What was done?
- Message `MNLISTIDFF` is enriched with a new field `quorumsCLSigs`.
This field holds the Chainlock Signature required for each set of
indexes corresponding to quorums in field `newQuorums`.
- Protocol version has been bumped to `70230`.
- Clients with protocol version greater or equal to `70230` will receive
the new field `quorumsCLSigs`.
- The same field is returned in `protx diff` RPC.
Note:
- Field `quorumsCLSigs` will populated only after v20 activation
- If for one or more quorums, no non-null CL sig was found in CbTx then
a null signature is returned in `quorumsCLSigs`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
- Functional test mininode's protocol version was bumped to `70230`.
- `feature_llmq_rotation.py` checks that `quorumsCLSigs` match in both
P2P and RPC messages.
## Breaking Changes
No
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: thephez <thephez@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: pasta <pasta@dashboost.org>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
It splits from https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5150/ by
@PastaPastaPasta request.
## What was done?
See commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16 RPC/Wallet: unloadwallet: Clarify docs/error when both the RPC endpoint and wallet_name parameter specify a wallet (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Just documentation clarifications from #20448
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16
jonatack:
re-ACK b1f59d55d920d2b35269b474762f94fec87bfb16 per `git diff e8303a0 b1f59d5`
Tree-SHA512: ac068b0aa7ceed49496367fdd9425b59dbba18b56e89b26afc22a6c8ece51f0b92a169cacd55740b1cadab2b32f4f8e8700e609066ab7e59d3b53c7891da585e
c91b241b48d7f97b3e6b39d84ec780f2a3e3a0a7 Updated outdated help command for getblocktemplate (fixes#19625) (Jake Leventhal)
Pull request description:
**Summary of Changes**
* Removed coinbasetxn from the help outputs
* Added the missing name for transactions in the help outputs
* Added help outputs for longpollid and default_witness_commitment
* Added more clarity to capabilities, rules, and coinbaseaux
**Rationale**
The outputs from the help command for `getblocktemplate` are outdated and don't reflect the actual results from `getblocktemplate` (see #19625 for more details)
Fixes#19625.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK c91b241b48d7f97b3e6b39d84ec780f2a3e3a0a7
fjahr:
utACK c91b241b48d7f97b3e6b39d84ec780f2a3e3a0a7
Tree-SHA512: ee443af4bc3b2838dfd92e2705f344256ee785ae720e505fffea9b0ec5b75930e3b1374bae59b36d5da57c85c9aefe4d62504b028b893d6f2914dccf1e34c658
f110b7c722eb150816a26cab161ac2b8c0f58609 rpc: document returned error fields as optional if applicable (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
The following RPCs return error fields (named `"error"` or `"errors"`) that are optional, but don't show up as optional in the help text yet:
* `analyzepsbt`
* `estimatesmartfee`
* `signrawtransactionwithkey`
* `signrawtransactionwithwallet`
The following RPC has the errors field already marked as optional, but doesn't match the usual format in the description (like `"if there are any"` in parantheses):
* `estimaterawfee`
This PR adds the missing optional flags and adapts the description strings. Inspired by a recent PR #19634 by justinmoon.
The instances were found via `git grep "RPCResult.*\"error"`. Note that there is one RPC so far where the return error is not optional (i.e. in case of no error, the field is included in the result, but is just empty), namely `bumpfee`.
ACKs for top commit:
adaminsky:
ACK `f110b7c`
laanwj:
ACK f110b7c722eb150816a26cab161ac2b8c0f58609, new documentation looks consistent with actual behavior
achow101:
ACK f110b7c722eb150816a26cab161ac2b8c0f58609
meshcollider:
utACK f110b7c722eb150816a26cab161ac2b8c0f58609
Tree-SHA512: 30c00f78a575b60e32b4536496af986d53a25f33e6ebbf553adcdcf825ad21a44f90267f3d1ea53326dac83bcfa9983fdb3dad6d3126e20f97f3c08ce286e188
f916847d2b56f2935c169e1b95b350a477c804cc rpc: Document getwalletinfo's unlocked_until field as optional (Justin Moon)
Pull request description:
The `getwalletinfo` RPC command's `unlocked_until` field is [optional in the code](f916847d2b/src/wallet/rpcwallet.cpp (L2397)), but wasn't marked as optional in the docs.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
ACK f916847d2b
achow101:
ACK f916847d2b56f2935c169e1b95b350a477c804cc
kristapsk:
ACK f916847d2b56f2935c169e1b95b350a477c804cc
Tree-SHA512: 8d82f0992fdaf8160000acf4a6e7e7f9ff289a90a983be2e078cf754f4b03601637e5f405afa66bd55adef9b347fa5eac5cc1822033b2ac08c587609cf3dfe0f
501e6ab4e778d8f4e95fdc807eeb8644df16203b doc: Add documentation for 'checklevel' argument in 'verifychain' RPC call (Calvin Kim)
Pull request description:
Rationale: When ```bitcoin-cli help verifychain``` is called, the user doesn't get any documentation about the ```checklevel``` argument, leading to issues like #18995.
This PR addresses that issue and adds documentation for what each level does, and that each level includes the checks of the previous levels.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 501e6ab4e778d8f4e95fdc807eeb8644df16203b `git diff 292ed3c 501e6ab` shows only change since last review is the verifychain RPCHelpMan edit; rebuild and retested manually anyway
MarcoFalke:
ACK 501e6ab4e778d8f4e95fdc807eeb8644df16203b 🚝
Tree-SHA512: 09239f79c25b5c3022b8eb1f76198ba681305d7e8775038e46becffe5f6a14c572e0c5d06b0723fe9d4a015ec42c9f7ca7b80a2a93df0b1b66f5a84a80eeeeb1
before 12%
<img width="1538" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/dashpay/dash/assets/6443210/fa5043fb-4e48-4728-bfaf-8636d5c20a8c">
after 10%
<img width="1544" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/dashpay/dash/assets/6443210/1df6aff4-2901-4af1-b421-3604f54df157">
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Redundant rehash
## What was done?
Avoid redundant rehash
## How Has This Been Tested?
Reindexed 0-500000 on testnet
## Breaking Changes
None
## Checklist:
_Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that
apply._
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`IsEnabled()` is checked inside anyway. Not starting the scheduler on
init results in no mixing on nodes with dynamically loaded wallets.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
During implementation #5469 (master node hard-fork) I noticed that some
parts of `CChainParams` are deprecated and can be removed.
## What was done?
1. removed methods from `CChainParams` that have no implementation at
all:
- UpdateSubsidyAndDiffParams
- UpdateLLMQChainLocks
- UpdateLLMQTestParams
- UpdateLLMQDevnetParams
2. removed method `BIP9CheckMasternodesUpgraded` from `CChainParams` and
a flag `check_mn_protocol` from `versionbitsinfo`.
(to follow-up dashpay/dash#2594)
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run functional/unit tests.
## Breaking Changes
N/A
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Current implementation of BLS wrapper has an unclear interface related
to `checkMalleable` flag.
There are 2 methods Unserialize, that has both default arguments:
```
template
inline void Unserialize(Stream& s, const bool specificLegacyScheme, bool checkMalleable = true);
template
inline void Unserialize(Stream& s, bool checkMalleable = true);
```
Let's assume that I am calling `Unserialize(s, true)` - it's very
non-obvious which one will be called and not error prune at all.
It should be re-implemented, and there should not be default argument.
Pasta noticed that this flag can be useful from performance point of
view - let's have better new method such as `UnserializeNoMalleable` or
similar and use it when reindexing/etc. It should be specified explicit.
Reverting this change and adding new interface in future won't be
difficult task so far as changes are quite trivial.
## What was done?
Removed flag checkMalleable to simplify code because it's always true.
It splits from https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5443
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit functional tests.
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes - flag is always true.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
There are useless debug logs "CDEF" in `wallet_tests` unit tests.
## What was done?
removes it
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Many usages of `CBLS{Signature,PrivateKey,PublicKey}` assume using
global variable, even if can be specified explicitly.
Some of these usages have been deglobalized in this PR.
Some prior improvements and fixes are here:
[#5403](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5403)
## What was done?
- Refactored the uses of global variable of `bls_legacy_scheme` from
`SetHex`, `SetByteVector`, some rpc calls.
- Removed flag `checkMalleable` to simplify code because it's always
`true`.
- Removed dependency from `txmempool.h` on `bls.h` to speed up
compilation.
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests.
## Breaking Changes
No breaking changes assumed. But in theory behaviour of some RPC can be
more explicit and predictable.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Allow `upgradetohd` in IBD, better errors, no GUI lock-up
## What was done?
Pls see individual commits. Most of it is changes in whitespaces, might
want to use ?w=1 to review i.e.
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5455/files?w=1
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests, try `upgradetohd` on testnet
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
`GetVersion` expects `is_basic_scheme_active`, not
`is_bls_legacy_scheme`
## What was done?
see commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
`make check`
## Breaking Changes
luckily only tests are affected
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
As reported by @kittywhiskers, GCC version 8 complains with `error:
'this' was not captured for this lambda function`
In order to support old GCC compilers, `this` should be captured
explicitly.
## What was done?
Captured `this` explicitly in affected functions: `GetValidMNsCount`,
`GetAllHPMNsCount`, `GetValidHPMNsCount` and `GetValidWeightedMNsCount`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_hpmn.py` checks MNs count
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Allow generating 12, 18, 24 words mnemonics. Default to 12 words as it's
the most popular option/de-facto a standard now imo.
## What was done?
Add `-mnemonicbits` option, add tests
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests, play with wallets on regtest
## Breaking Changes
n/a, old wallets should not be affected
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
- make progress calculations sane
- show progress in GUI but only when you need 100+ new keys
- make it stop on shutdown request
- spam less in debug.log
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests, run `keypoolrefill` with `1100` (add 100 keys, no gui popup)
and `10000` (100+ keys, progress bar) on testnet wallet, check logs,
verify it can be interrupted on shutdown
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
TL;DR: Should hopefully fix crashes like
https://gitlab.com/dashpay/dash/-/jobs/4522256293
In dashd we flush all callbacks first and then destroy `g_txindex`. In
tests we had to move `g_txindex` to `TestChainSetup` and its dtor is
executed first, so the order is broken. It also explains why this crash
happens so rare. In most cases tx index is up to date and you need some
kind of a hiccup for scheduler to lag behind a bit. Basically, between
`g_txindex.reset()` and `FlushBackgroundCallbacks`
`BaseIndex::BlockConnected` finally arrives. But it’s processed on a
(now) null instance hence a crash. If it’s earlier - it’s processed
normally, if it’s later - it’s flushed without execution, so there is a
tiny window to catch this crash.
## What was done?
Give tx index a bit of time to process everything
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests (but this crash is rare 🤷♂️ )
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
It's super slow for wallets with 100.000s of txes to process lots of
notifications produced by rescan. Skip them all and simply refresh the
whole wallet instead. In my case (500k+ txes testnet wallet) gui update
after `rescanblockchain` time is down from _forever_ to ~30 seconds.
Same for `wipewallettxes true` (#5451 ). Gui update after
`wipewallettxes`/`wipewallettxes false` is instant (cause there are no
txes anymore) vs _forever_ before the patch.
## What was done?
refresh the whole wallet when notification queue is above 10K operations
actual changes (ignoring whitespaces):
d013cb4f5c
## How Has This Been Tested?
running on top of #5451 and #5452 , wiping and rescanning w/ and w/out
this patch.
## Breaking Changes
should be none
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
It's super slow for wallets with 100.000s of keys and txes to reindex
and to rescan. Batching multiple operations fixes it. In my case (300K+
keys and 500k+ txes testnet wallet) `rescanblockchain` time is down from
6+ hours to ~10 minutes.
Re-calculating `block_time` over and over again inside of the loop in
`AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe` is wasteful, move it out.
## What was done?
batch what's possible, optimize `AddToWalletIfInvolvingMe`
## How Has This Been Tested?
running on top of #5451 , wiping and rescanning w/ and w/out this patch.
## Breaking Changes
should be none
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Given the hard fork that happened on testnet, there is now lots of the
transactions that were made on the fork that is no longer valid. Some
transactions could be relayed and mined again but some like coinjoin
mixing won't be relayed because of 0 fee and transactions spending
coinbases from the forked branch are no longer valid at all.
## What was done?
Introduce `wipewallettxes` RPC and `wipetxes` command for `dash-wallet`
tool to be able to get rid of some/all txes in the wallet.
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests, use rpc/command on testnet wallet
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Version field should always be the first field of a message for better
readibility.
## What was done?
- Introduced new protocol version `MNLISTDIFF_VERSION_ORDER` (`70229`).
- `nVersion` serialisation order is changed for clients with protocol
version greater than or equal to `70229`.
- For clients with protocol version >= `70225` and < `70229` the old
order is used: can be deprecated in the future.
- Increased functional test P2P mininode's protocol version to `70229`.
## How Has This Been Tested?
`feature_llmq_rotation.py` with new protocol version.
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Added the filter `hpmn` for both `masternodelist` and `protx list` rpcs.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
Calling this RPC on Testnet.
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
---------
Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <UdjinM6@users.noreply.github.com>
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Disabled or non-enforced Chainlocks does not mean you can safely mine
non-locked txes, you could end up mining a block that is going to be
rejected by everyone else if a conflicting tx (missing on your node)
would be IS-locked. I can't find any reason why we have this besides "if
Chainlocks are disabled then smth is wrong so let them all be mined" but
we have spork_2 and spork_3 to control IS behaviour and we check them in
`IsTxSafeForMining` already, that would be a much more straightforward
way to deal with a potential issue.
Noticed this while reviewing #5150 and also while testing v19.2 during
recent testnet v19 re-fork.
## What was done?
Drop this check, adjust tests
## How Has This Been Tested?
Run tests locally
## Breaking Changes
Not quote breaking changes but a change in behaviour: with CLs disabled
it will now take 10 minutes for non-locked txes to be mined, same as
when CLs are enabled.
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Mining blocks with a specific version can be useful on testnet and
devnets too
## What was done?
lift restrictions for `-blockversion`
## How Has This Been Tested?
it should just work :)
## Breaking Changes
n//a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
bump chainparams to some post failed-v19-fork block on mainnet and post
recent-v19-fork block on testnet
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Should fix
https://github.com/dashpay/dash/pull/5424#discussion_r1228654939 and
make `CSimplifiedMNListEntry`'s json a bit more human-friendly (imo) by
having `nVersion` and `nType` at the top of it.
Move `nVersion` up for `CSimplifiedMNListDiff` too.
NOTE: `nVersion` wasn't actually duplicated in rpc results, it was
simply assigned twice inside. still not nice though.
Thanks @thephez ! 👍
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
fix a couple of issues in help texts
develop:
```
protx register "collateralHash" collateralIndex "ipAndPort" "ownerAddress" "operatorPubKey_register" "votingAddress_register" "operatorReward" "payoutAddress_register" ( "feeSourceAddress" submit )
...
3. ipAndPort (string, required) IP and port in the form "IP:PORT".
Must be unique on the network. Can be set to 0, which will require a ProUpServTx afterwards.
...
5. operatorPubKey_register (string, required) The operator BLS public key. The BLS private key does not have to be known.
It has to match the BLS private key which is later used when operating the masternode.
6. votingAddress_register (string, required) The voting key address. The private key does not have to be known by your wallet.
It has to match the private key which is later used when voting on proposals.
If set to an empty string, ownerAddress will be used.
7. operatorReward (string, required) The fraction in %% to share with the operator. The value must be
between 0.00 and 100.00.
8. payoutAddress_register (string, required) The dash address to use for masternode reward payments.
...
```
```
protx update_service "proTxHash" "ipAndPort" "operatorKey" ( "operatorPayoutAddress" "feeSourceAddress" )
...
2. ipAndPort (string, required) IP and port in the form "IP:PORT".
Must be unique on the network. Can be set to 0, which will require a ProUpServTx afterwards.
...
```
fe95dfdd7a97ae5150d8e28ea908f619c6080008:
```
protx register "collateralHash" collateralIndex "ipAndPort" "ownerAddress" "operatorPubKey" "votingAddress" "operatorReward" "payoutAddress" ( "feeSourceAddress" submit )
...
3. ipAndPort (string, required) IP and port in the form "IP:PORT". Must be unique on the network.
Can be set to an empty string, which will require a ProUpServTx afterwards.
...
5. operatorPubKey (string, required) The operator BLS public key. The BLS private key does not have to be known.
It has to match the BLS private key which is later used when operating the masternode.
6. votingAddress (string, required) The voting key address. The private key does not have to be known by your wallet.
It has to match the private key which is later used when voting on proposals.
If set to an empty string, ownerAddress will be used.
7. operatorReward (string, required) The fraction in %% to share with the operator.
The value must be between 0 and 10000.
8. payoutAddress (string, required) The dash address to use for masternode reward payments.
...
```
```
protx update_service "proTxHash" "ipAndPort" "operatorKey" ( "operatorPayoutAddress" "feeSourceAddress" )
...
2. ipAndPort (string, required) IP and port in the form "IP:PORT". Must be unique on the network.
...
```
## What was done?
pls see individual commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
run `dash-qt`, check `help <cmd>` response
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Removed collateral amount from help text for `protx register_fund_hpmn`
RPC.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Some conditions won't trigger when reorging exactly from the forkpoint
## What was done?
pls see individual commits, tl;dr: you can't get correct results with
`GetAncestor` cause the answer is in the future
## How Has This Been Tested?
reorg to 850000 and back on testnet
```
invalidateblock 0000003eddb94218e7a3f41b2ac6e26143f8a748b50cd26e86bdbbab9ebe50aa
reconsiderblock 0000003eddb94218e7a3f41b2ac6e26143f8a748b50cd26e86bdbbab9ebe50aa
```
this fails on develop and work with this patch
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Same as #5428 but with a lower block number this time. This should let
us simply reorg testnet with 18.2.2 at deeper blocks instead of bumping
v19 testnet activation params for 19.2.
## What was done?
## How Has This Been Tested?
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Having these above v19 forkpoint (850100) would result in v19.2 nodes
forking at the wrong height (864000) when reindexing without
`--assumevalid=<0 or some pre-v19 block height>`
## What was done?
Go back to pre-v19 block (850000) in chainparams
## How Has This Been Tested?
reindex
## Breaking Changes
n/a
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Mobile wallets would have to convert 4k+ pubkeys at the V19 fork point
and it's a pretty hard job for them that can easily take 10-15 seconds
if not more. Also after the HF, if a masternode list is requested from
before the HF, the operator keys come in basic scheme, but the
merkelroot was calculated with legacy. From mobile team work it wasn't
possible to convert all operator keys to legacy and then calculate the
correct merkleroot.
~This PR builds on top of ~#5392~ #5403 (changes that belong to this PR:
26f7e966500bdea4c604f1d16716b40b366fc707 and
4b42dc8fcee3354afd82ce7e3a72ebe1659f5f22) and aims to solve both of
these issues.~
cc @hashengineering @QuantumExplorer
## What was done?
Introduce `nVersion` on p2p level for every CSimplifiedMNListEntry. Set
`nVersion` to the same value we have it in CDeterministicMNState i.e.
pubkey serialization would not be via basic scheme only after the V19
fork, it would match the way it’s serialized on-chain/in
CDeterministicMNState for that specific MN.
## How Has This Been Tested?
run tests
## Breaking Changes
NOTE: `testnet` is going to re-fork at v19 forkpoint because
`merkleRootMNList` is not going to match
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
- CBLSLazyWrapper is doing to much and not enough at the same time
- nVersion assignment in CDeterministicMNState(Diff) is incomplete
- pubKeyOperator deserialization needs nVersion but nVersion is deser-ed
much later
- protx rpcs are implicitly converting pubKeyOperator (by forcing
nVersion=2), they shouldn't do that
## What was done?
pls see individual commits
## How Has This Been Tested?
- [x] run tests locally
- [x] reindex on testnet:
- [x] with and without `--assumevalid=0` to the tip
- [x] with 19.1 almost to the forkpoint, then with this version
- [x] reindex on mainnet:
- [x] with and without `--assumevalid=0` to the tip
- [x] with 19.1 to height 1100000+, then with this version
## Breaking Changes
might need reindexing if you were running develop on testnet already
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
tip: it was originally designed to be called for every block but 4743 changed that so the old logic no longer applies.
the second condition: well, it's just wrong.
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Should fix#5401 with minimal potential coinjoin service interruption
(~1 minute around v19 fork point) for up to date clients. Fully
backwards compatible prior to v19 activation. Old clients won't be able
to mix after v19 activation though until they implement similar changes.
_EDIT: Actually, this is already the case cause bls sigs are going to
change too._ And I think we should also be able to finally drop
`masternodeOutpoint` from `CCoinJoinQueue` and `CCoinJoinBroadcastTx`
once v19 is active because of that which would be a nice bonus.
cc @HashEngineering
## What was done?
re-use v19 activation to switch `GetSignatureHash` logic
## How Has This Been Tested?
mixing on mainnet
## Breaking Changes
mixing won't work on current testnet until MNs are updated
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
2f97c1180b7eba2c48683a553ca166eba84e14c6 doc: Remove TODO 'exclude peers with download permission' (Douglas Chimento)
Pull request description:
Following from PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23109
The [TODO](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/net.cpp#L2872) is no longer necessary.
Removing it to prevent future confusion.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: c2f4c3eae951d13d623e1b4bd9315804ec33473e501367f89edae80fa446674edc71549e145f058fe7126b8588790dc895d6ea3dfb4347ceeca61f5e5f2f95cc
036d7eadf5dd0e06e0734a5d78dbe28f4bfaa07f doc: Correct description of CAddrMan::Create() (Amiti Uttarwar)
318176aff1ded36d1fbc5977f288ac3bac1d8712 doc: Update high-level addrman description (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
The high-level description of `addrman` has outdated information with respect to the eviction behavior, both for the New and Tried tables (at least since #5941) - this has confused me in the past.
This PR corrects this and also adds basic info about the bucket size and position.
ACKs for top commit:
amitiuttarwar:
reACK 036d7eadf5dd0e06e0734a5d78dbe28f4bfaa07f
jnewbery:
ACK 036d7eadf5dd0e06e0734a5d78dbe28f4bfaa07f
Tree-SHA512: 3f0635d765f5e580a1fae31187742a833cef66ef2286d40eeb28f2253521260038e16e5f1a65741464a2ddfdbeb5c0f1bc38bf73841e600639033d59c3c534e4
fa73ce6e653d00824eb68f772fd29b7f8fb93d84 Fix assumeutxo crash due to truncated file (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK fa73ce6e653d00824eb68f772fd29b7f8fb93d84
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK fa73ce6e653d00824eb68f772fd29b7f8fb93d84. Easy fix. It seems like this could have been caught in review, though.
Tree-SHA512: 3a98687c386e3995114ddf0ad7194fadd9520989290681ef703b578e3ca21aee51eadfb83aa38a489bac13d12709ea137b9b184b08e5bfa2919cca177aab90be
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
current develop fails to reindex whenever there is an issue at node
start (prints `should not be overwriting a chainstate` in `debug.log`)
## What was done?
reset chainman to allow it re-initialize chainstate
## How Has This Been Tested?
simulated an issue with
```
if (!fReset) {
strLoadError = _("DEBUG");
break;
}
```
## Breaking Changes
should not be any but pls test
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository
code-owners and collaborators only)_
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Member obj.keyIDOwner is read & write twice
## What was done?
Fixed: it is serialized once
## How Has This Been Tested?
Unit/functional tests in CI
## Breaking Changes
Data format in database changed in incompatible way
## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone
